throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 41436
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00061-TSK
`
` STIPULATION AND ORDER JOINING
`BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC. AS DEFENDANT
`
`WHEREAS, on or about October 29, 2021, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”)
`
`submitted Biologics License Application No 761274 (the “BLA”) to the U.S. Food and Drug
`
`Administration (the “FDA”), seeking licensure to market M710 (or YESAFILITM) for injection
`
`(the “BLA Product”), as a biosimilar version of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Regeneron”)
`
`EYLEA® product, before expiration of various patents owned by Regeneron;
`
`WHEREAS, on or about August 2, 2022, Regeneron filed this suit against Mylan, alleging
`
`that the submission of Mylan’s BLA and the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale
`
`and/or importation of the BLA Product are acts of infringement of certain patents (the “Asserted
`
`Patents”) owned by Regeneron;
`
`WHEREAS, Mylan denies infringement, and has filed counterclaims seeking judicial
`
`declarations that the Asserted Patents are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed;
`
`WHEREAS, Biocon Biologics Inc. (“BBI”) has represented that it is the successor in
`
`interest to all of Mylan’s rights, title, and interest in and to the BLA and BLA Product;
`
`1
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 1
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 41437
`
`WHEREAS, the FDA has accepted the transfer of ownership of the BLA from Mylan to
`
`BBI, effective as of March 17, 2023;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, including pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 25(c), and
`
`subject to the approval of the Court, that:
`
`1.
`
`BBI is hereby joined as a Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff to this suit for all
`
`purposes, and with respect to all claims, defenses and counterclaims, and rulings of the Court, as
`
`successor in interest to all of Mylan’s rights, title and interest in and to the BLA and BLA Product.
`
`BBI hereby adopts all representations, contentions, admissions, positions, and stipulations made
`
`by Mylan in this action to date and agrees to be bound by those representations, contentions,
`
`admissions, positions, and stipulations to the same extent as Mylan is or would be bound. Any
`
`evidence that supports a finding of infringement as to Mylan will support a finding of infringement
`
`as to BBI. Regeneron hereby acknowledges that any representations, contentions, admissions,
`
`positions, and stipulations made to Mylan by Regeneron in this action to date shall also apply
`
`equally to BBI. For clarity, neither Mylan nor BBI will allege that any finding or judgment as to
`
`infringement, validity, enforceability, remedies, or any finding subsidiary thereto, shall not issue
`
`or apply on the basis that BBI, rather than Mylan, has any interest in the BLA or BLA Product.
`
`For further clarity, any statutory protections afforded Mylan for the actions taken by Mylan and/or
`
`Regeneron during the pre-suit exchanges pursuant to Biologics Price Competition and Innovation
`
`Act (“BPCIA”) shall also equally apply to BBI.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`The current trial schedule shall be unaffected by this Stipulation and Order.
`
`Upon filing of this Stipulation, BBI shall be a party to the Stipulated Protective
`
`Order, and may provide a list of no more than three proposed In-House Counsel who it wishes to
`
`2
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 2
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 41438
`
`have access to Confidential information pursuant to ¶ 6(i) of the Protective Order, on the terms
`
`and conditions provided for by the Protective Order.
`
`4.
`
`BBI is prepared to produce, via electronic transfer, the entirety of its BLA and
`
`regulatory correspondence with the FDA concerning the BLA Product following transfer of
`
`ownership to BBI, including any documents reflecting, documenting, or summarizing oral
`
`communications with FDA concerning the BLA product, and will produce that material to
`
`Regeneron within 2 business days of the parties’ filing of this Stipulation with the Court. BBI
`
`accepts a continuing obligation to produce such material on an ongoing basis, consistent with FED.
`
`R. CIV. P. 26(e). BBI will produce such material in compliance with the terms of the parties’
`
`Stipulated Protective Order and will not argue that ¶ 1(m) or other provisions of the Protective
`
`Order permit BBI to designate its FDA correspondence “OCEO” on a theory that documents
`
`relevant to BBI’s prospective product necessarily merit OCEO protection.
`
`5.
`
`Neither BBI nor Mylan will use this Stipulation as an admission or basis to seek to
`
`have Mylan dismissed from this action. Similarly, nothing in this Stipulation prejudices
`
`Regeneron from opposing any request to have Mylan dismissed from this action, and this
`
`Stipulation does not constitute a statement by Regeneron that it no longer has claims against
`
`Mylan.
`
`6.
`
`Neither BBI nor Mylan will seek to dismiss or transfer any portion of this action
`
`based on any argument the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over BBI or Mylan or any argument
`
`that venue in the Northern District of West Virginia is improper or inconvenient.
`
`7.
`
`The Clerk is directed to amend the caption to add BBI as a Defendant-Counterclaim
`
`Plaintiff, as noted below.
`
`3
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 3
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 41439
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and
`BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00061-TSK
`
`4
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 4
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 41440
`
`Date: June 2, 2023
`
` CAREY DOUGLAS KESSLER & RUBY, PLLC
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`David I. Berl (admitted PHV)
`Ellen E. Oberwetter (admitted PHV)
`Thomas S. Fletcher (admitted PHV)
`Andrew V. Trask (admitted PHV)
`Teagan J. Gregory (admitted PHV)
`Shaun P. Mahaffy (admitted PHV)
`Sean M. Douglass (admitted PHV)
`Kathryn S. Kayali (admitted PHV)
`Arthur J. Argall III (admitted PHV)
`Adam Pan (admitted PHV)
`Nicholas Jordan (admitted PHV)
`Haylee Bernal Anderson (admitted PHV)
`Renee Griffin (admitted PHV)
`Rebecca Carter (admitted PHV)
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`680 Maine Avenue, SW
`Washington, DC 20024
`(202) 434-5000
`dberl@wc.com
`eoberwetter@wc.com
`tfletcher@wc.com
`atrask@wc.com
`tgregory@wc.com
`smahaffy@wc.com
`sdouglass@wc.com
`kkayali@wc.com
`aargall@wc.com
`apan@wc.com
`njordan@wc.com
`handerson@wc.com
`rgriffin@wc.com
`rebeccacarter@wc.com
`
` /s/ Steven R. Ruby
`Steven R. Ruby (WVSB No. 10752)
`David R. Pogue (WVSB No. 10806)
`707 Virginia Street East
`901 Chase Tower (25301)
`P.O. Box 913
`Charleston, West Virginia 25323
`(304) 345-1234
`sruby@cdkrlaw.com
`drpogue@cdkrlaw.com
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Andrew E. Goldsmith (admitted PHV)
`Evan T. Leo (admitted PHV)
`Jacob E. Hartman (admitted PHV)
`Mary Charlotte Y. Carroll (admitted PHV)
`Sven E. Henningson (admitted PHV)
`KELLOGG, HANSEN, TODD, FIGEL &
`FREDERICK, P.L.L.C.
`1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`TEL: (202) 326-7900
`agoldsmith@kellogghansen.com
`eleo@kellogghansen.com
`jhartman@kellogghansen.com
`mcarroll@kellogghansen.com
`shenningson@kellogghansen.com
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Regeneron
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`5
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 5
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 41441
`
`Dated: June 2, 2023
`
`STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC
`
`Of Counsel (admitted pro hac vice):
`William A. Rakoczy
`Deanne M. Mazzochi
`Heinz J. Salmen
`Eric R. Hunt
`Jeff A. Marx
`Neil B. McLaughlin
`Lauren M. Lesko
`L. Scott Beall
`Thomas H. Ehrich
`Steven J. Birkos
`Katie A. Boda
`Abraham J. Varon
`Jake R. Ritthamel
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`6 W. Hubbard St., Suite 500
`Chicago, IL 60654
`(312) 527-2157
`wrakoczy@rmmslegal.com
`dmazzochi@rmmslegal.com
`hsalmen@rmmslegal.com
`ehunt@rmmslegal.com
`jmarx@rmmslegal.com
`nmclaughlin@rmmslegal.com
`llesko@rmmslegal.com
`sbeall@rmmslegal.com
`tehrich@rmmslegal.com
`sbirkos@rmmslegal.com
`kboda@rmmslegal.com
`avaron@rmmslegal.com
`jritthamel@rmmslegal.com
`
` /s/ Gordon H. Copland
`Gordon H. Copland (WVSB #828)
`William J. O’Brien (WVSB #10549)
`400 White Oaks Boulevard
`Bridgeport, WV 26330
`(304) 933-8162
`gordon.copland@steptoe-johnson.com
`william.obrien@steptoe-johnson.com
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`6
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 6
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 41442
`
`Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation, the provisions thereof are APPROVED and
`
`it is SO ORDERED.
`
`June 5, 2023
`DATED: ____________________
`
`________________________________________
`THOMAS S. KLEEH, CHIEF JUDGE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
`
`7
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 7
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 523 Filed 06/05/23 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 41443
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that on the 2nd day of June, 2023, I served the foregoing " Stipulation and
`
`Order Joining Biocon Biologics Inc. as Defendant” by electronically filing the same with the Clerk
`
`using the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will send notification of the filing to all counsel of
`
`record.
`
` /s/ Gordon H. Copland
`Gordon H. Copland (WVSB #828)
`William J. O’Brien (WVSB #10549)
`400 White Oaks Boulevard
`Bridgeport, WV 26330
`(304) 933-8162
`gordon.copland@steptoe-johnson.com
`william.obrien@steptoe-johnson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`8
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2027 Page 8
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket