throbber
DA VINCI: DME And VEGF Trap-Eye: INvestigation of Clinical Impact: Phase 2
`study in patients with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
`
`Author: David Brown, MD
`
`BACKGROUND
`VEGF Trap is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of VEGF binding domains of
`human VEGF receptors 1 and 2 fused to the Fc domain of human IgG1. VEGF Trap-Eye
`has demonstrated bioactivity and safety in a phase 1 study of diabetic macular edema.
`
`PURPOSE
`Present detailed efficacy and safety analyses of the primary 24-week endpoint from the
`Phase 2 study assessing VEGF Trap-Eye vs. laser photocoagulation in DME.
`
`METHODS
`DA VINCI is a multi-center, randomized, active-controlled Phase 2 clinical study,
`designed to assess safety and efficacy of 4 dose/dose intervals of VEGF Trap-Eye (VTE)
`in comparison to laser photocoagulation. 221 patients were randomized (219 treated) to 1
`of the following treatment groups: 0.5mg q4wks, 2mg q4wks, 2mg q8wks, 2mg prn or
`laser photocoagulation. The primary endpoint is the mean change from baseline in BCVA
`at week 24. Secondary endpoints include changes in retinal thickness (CRT) on OCT and
`central retinal sensitivity. Central retinal sensitivity was measured using the Nidek MP-1
`microperimeter with values corresponding to the OCT central subfield.
`
`RESULTS
`At 6 months, the mean change in BCVA for each VTE group ranged from +8.5 to +11.4
`letters and was statistically significantly better than the mean change in BCVA in the
`laser group (+2.5 letters; p<0.001), and no significant difference was noted among the
`VTE arms. Anatomical changes were significant as well. Mean change in CRT for each
`VTE group ranged from -127μm to -195μm and was statistically significantly greater
`than the mean change in CRT for the laser group (-68μm; p<0.01). VTE arms had a
`mean gain in central retinal sensitivity ranging from 1.5 to 4.1dB, while the laser arm had
`a mean decrease of -0.4dB. VEGF Trap-Eye was generally well-tolerated, and adverse
`events reported were those typically associated with intravitreal injections or underlying
`disease. The most frequent adverse events reported in the VTE arm included conjunctival
`hemorrhage, eye pain, floaters, ocular hyperemia, and increased IOP.
`
`CONCLUSION
`In this patient population, VTE was generally well tolerated and produced statistically
`significant improvements from baseline in visual acuity, retinal thickness and central
`retinal sensitivity as compared to laser photocoagulation.
`
`Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Exhibit 2022 Page 1
`Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. IPR2023-00884
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket