`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________
`
` IPR2023-008841
`U.S. Patent No. 11,253,572
`
`_______________
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2024-00260 and IPR2024-00298 are joined with IPR2023-00884.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Board’s Second Modified
`
`
`
`
`
`Scheduling Order (Paper 38) entered on March 11, 2024, Petitioner Samsung
`
`Bioepis Co., Ltd. (“Petitioner”) hereby respectfully requests oral argument in this
`
`proceeding. The oral hearing is currently scheduled for August 23, 2024. Paper
`
`38 at 3. Petitioner requests that the Board allot 60 minutes total for the oral
`
`argument, which would be divided equally between the parties (30 minutes per
`
`side). Patent Owner Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has indicated it is not in a
`
`position to join this request at this time.
`
`
`
`Petitioner would prefer an in-person hearing, assuming that is convenient for the
`
`Board. Petitioner further requests that in-house counsel and any other non-arguing
`
`attorneys be permitted to attend the oral argument remotely. Petitioner will advise the
`
`Board as to any audio/video request as soon as practicable.
`
`
`
`The issues to be argued include:
`
`1.
`
`The patentability of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Patent No. 11,253,572;
`
`2. Any other issues the Petitioner and Patent Owner properly raised in the
`
`Petition, Patent Owner Response, and Reply in the proceeding;
`
`3. Any other issues that the Board deems necessary for issuing a Final
`
`Written Decision.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`DATED: July 8, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`By /Raymond N. Nimrod/
`Raymond N. Nimrod (Reg. No. 31,987)
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`Matthew A. Traupman (Reg. No. 50,832)
`matthewtraupman@quinnemanuel.com
`Elliot Choi (admitted pro hac vice)
`elliotchoi@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
`& SULLIVAN LLP
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`
`Zachariah Summers (admitted pro hac vice)
`Sarah Cork (admitted pro hac vice)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90017
`General Tel: (213) 443-3000
`Fax: (213) 443-3100
`zachsummers@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`Landon Andrew Smith (Reg. No. 79,248)
`landonsmith@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`300 W. 6th Street
`Austin, TX 78701
`Tel: (737) 667-6100
`Fax: (737) 667-6110
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner Samsung Bioepis
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Certificate of Service (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4))
`
`I hereby certify that on July 8, 2024, a true and correct copy of the foregoing
`
`Joint Request for Oral Argument was served via electronic mail to counsel for
`
`Petitioner at Regeneron-MoFo-IPR@mofo.com; counsel for Biocon Biologics, Inc. at
`
`MYL_REG_IPR@rmmslegal.com;
`
`and
`
`counsel
`
`for Celltrion,
`
`Inc.
`
`at
`
`lgreen@geminilaw.com,
`
`fchu@geminilaw.com,
`
`rcerwinski@geminilaw.com,
`
`azalcenstein@geminilaw.com, and bmorris@geminilaw.com.
`
`
`
`DATED: July 8, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By /Raymond N. Nimrod/
`Raymond N. Nimrod (Reg. No. 31,987)
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`Tel: (212) 849-7000
`Fax: (212) 849-7100
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
