throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 1 of 90 PageID #:
`28043
`

`

`

`

`

`

`
`Exhibit 10
`
`
`
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 2 of 90 PageID #:
`28044
`
`Page 1
`
` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
` FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
`
` WEST VIRGINIA
`
` Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00061-TSK
`
` ------------------------------------x
`
` REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` -against-
`
` MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
` Defendant.
`
` ------------------------------------x
`
` 650 Fifth Avenue
`
` New York, New York
`
` December 16, 2022
`
` 9:12 a.m.
`
` VIDEOTAPED HYBRID DEPOSITION of
`
` KAREN CHU, a witness in the
`
` above-entitled action, held at the above
`
` time and place, taken before Dawn Matera,
`
` a Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public of
`
` the State of New York.
`
` * * *
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 2
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 3 of 90 PageID #:
`28045
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 4
`1 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning.
`2 We are going on the record at
`3 a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Please
`4 note that the microphones are
`5 sensitive and may pick up whispering
`6 and private conversations. Please
`7 mute your phones at this time. Audio
`8 and video recording will continue to
`9 take place unless all parties agree to
`10 go off the record.
`11 This is media unit 1 of the
`12 video-recorded deposition of Karen Chu
`13 taken by counsel in the matter of
`14 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. versus
`15 Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., filed in
`16 the United States District Court for
`17 the Northern District of West
`18 Virginia, civil action number
`19 1:22-CV-00061-TSK.
`20 The location of this deposition
`21 is in the offices of Williams &
`22 Connolly, 650 Fifth Avenue, New York,
`23 New York. My name is Zef Cota and I
`24 am the videographer. The court
`25 reporter is Dawn Matera, from the firm
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 5
`
`1 of Veritext.
`2 I am not authorized to
`3 administer an oath. I am not related
`4 to any party in this action nor am I
`5 financially interested in the outcome.
`6 Counsel and all present in the
`7 room have been noted for the
`8 stenographic record.
`9 Will the court reporter please
`10 swear in the witness and then counsel
`11 may proceed.
`12 K A R E N C H U, the Witness herein,
`13 having first been duly sworn by the
`14 Notary Public, was examined and testified
`15 as follows:
`16 EXAMINATION BY MS. MAZZOCHI:
`17 Q. Thank you. Good morning,
`18 Ms. Chu, my name is Deanne Mazzochi.
`19 Can you please state your full
`20 name and address for the record.
`21 A. Yes, Karen Chu, and my home
`22 address is 73 Richbell Road, White
`23 Plains, New York 10605.
`24 Q. Is this your first time given
`25 testimony under oath?
`
`1 A P P E A R A N C E S : (Continued)
`
`2 3
`
` WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
` Attorneys for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals,
`4 Inc.
` 680 Maine Ave S.W.
`5 Washington, D.C. 20024
`6 By: ELLEN E. OBERWETTER, ESQ.
` eoberwetter@wc.com
`7 KATHRYN S. KAYALI, ESQ.
` kkayali@wc.com
`
`8 9
`
` RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`10 Attorneys for Mylan Pharmaceuticals
` 6 W. Hubbard Street
`11 Suite 500
` Chicago, Illinois 60654
`
`12
`
` By: DEANNE M. MAZZOCHI, ESQ.
`13 dmazzochi@rmmslegal.com
` (Remote Attendance)
`14 JEFFREY A. MARX, ESQ.
` jmarx@rmmslegal.com
`15 HEINZ J. SALMEN, ESQ.
` hsalmen@rmmslegal.com
`16 (Remote Attendance)
`17
`18 CAREY DOUGLAS KESSLER & RUBY PLLC
` Local Counsel for Regeneron
`19 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
` 707 Virginia Street East
`20 901 Chase Tower
` Charleston, West Virginia 25301
`
`21
`
` By: DAVID POGUE, ESQ.
`22 drpogue@cdkrlaw.com
` (Remote Attendance.)
`
`23
`24
`25
`
`1 A P P E A R A N C E S : (Continued)
`
`23
`
` STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC
` Local Counsel for Mylan
`4 707 Virginia Street East
` Chase Tower, 17th Floor
`5 Charleston, West Virginia 25301
`6 By: JOHN PIZZO, ESQ.
` john.pizzo@steptoe-johnson.com
`7 (Remote Attendance)
`
`89
`
`10 Also Present:
`11 ADAM BERNSTEIN, Regeneron
`12 PETRA SCAMBOROVA, Regeneron
`13 ZEF COTA, Videographer
`14 ~oOo~
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`2 (Pages 2 - 5)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 3
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 4 of 90 PageID #:
`28046
`
`Page 6
`
`Page 8
`
`1 A. I previously gave testimony
`2 under oath in a different case many, many
`3 years ago.
`4 Q. Okay. Do you recall -- did
`5 that case involve Regeneron?
`6 A. It did not.
`7 Q. Did it involve any VEGF
`8 inhibitors?
`9 A. It did not. It involved a
`10 personal liability suit against the
`11 summer camp I went to.
`12 Q. Have you participated at all in
`13 any FTC proceedings prior to being
`14 deposed in this case?
`15 A. No, I have not.
`16 Q. Have you been asked to provide
`17 documents or records in connection with
`18 any matter involving the United States
`19 government and Regeneron?
`20 A. I have not.
`21 Q. How about any claims involving
`22 a state government?
`23 A. No, not that I am aware.
`24 Q. How about any litigation
`25 involving Regeneron and an insurer or an
`
`1 company here on the East Coast, Purdue
`2 Pharma. And then worked for them for
`3 approximately a little over two years
`4 before moving to a small contract
`5 research organization called Barton &
`6 Polansky, located here in New York City.
`7 After that, I joined a company
`8 that was headquartered in Gaithersburg,
`9 Maryland called GenVec. They were a gene
`10 therapy company. And after I left -- I
`11 was with GenVec for four years before
`12 joining Regeneron.
`13 Q. How did you get involved in or
`14 what training did you receive in
`15 connection with clinical -- human
`16 clinical trials?
`17 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`18 form.
`19 You can answer it.
`20 A. Okay. Just a clarification,
`21 are you asking about training I received
`22 throughout my career or specific to
`23 Regeneron?
`24 Q. Right, throughout your career,
`25 because with an MS in nutrition, jumping
`
`Page 7
`
`Page 9
`
`1 HMO?
`2 A. Not that I am aware of.
`3 Q. Have you received any subpoenas
`4 to appear before a state or federal grand
`5 jury?
`6 A. I have not received any
`7 subpoenas.
`8 Q. Can you please state for the
`9 record your educational background post
`10 high school?
`11 A. Sure. I have a bachelor's of
`12 science degree in biology from Cal Poly
`13 San Luis Obispo and a master's in human
`14 nutrition from Columbia University.
`15 Q. And can you please describe
`16 your employment history after you
`17 graduated from Columbia University with
`18 you are your MS in human nutrition?
`19 A. Sure. After graduation and
`20 completion of my degree, I joined a small
`21 biotech company located in the San
`22 Francisco Bay area called Seqirus
`23 Pharmaceuticals.
`24 After working at that company
`25 for a little over a year, I moved to a
`
`1 into quality assurance roles and clinical
`2 research roles such as at GenVec, you
`3 know, how did you -- what type of
`4 training did you get in order to --
`5 either in connection with those roles?
`6 A. Sure. So the very first
`7 position I had in clinical research was
`8 as a clinical trial assistant. And as
`9 part of my role I helped with the
`10 operations of clinical trials and
`11 received good clinical practice training
`12 as part of my role.
`13 So GCP training was provided
`14 both by in-house individuals as well as
`15 I've attended external courses on both
`16 good clinical practice, as well as
`17 international conference on harmonization
`18 practices.
`19 Q. Do you have any certifications
`20 in connection with either clinical
`21 practice work or the international
`22 harmonization standards?
`23 A. I do not hold any current
`24 certifications.
`25 Q. Have you previously?
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`3 (Pages 6 - 9)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 4
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 5 of 90 PageID #:
`28047
`
`Page 10
`
`Page 12
`
`1 A. Previously I did have a
`2 certified contract research associate
`3 certification.
`4 Q. And how did you get that?
`5 A. That required a certain number
`6 of hours as well as taking an exam
`7 through the Association of Clinical
`8 Research Professionals.
`9 Q. Is there a reason why you
`10 allowed your certification on that to
`11 lapse?
`12 A. So in my over 25 years of
`13 experience in clinical development, it
`14 was not critical to the role I have now
`15 and felt that it was not necessary to
`16 keep that certification.
`17 Q. All right. Tell me how you
`18 came to be employed at Regeneron?
`19 A. So the company I worked for
`20 just prior to Regeneron, GenVec, was a
`21 small biotechnology firm, and they were
`22 having some, as many biotechnology
`23 companies do, some troubles with funding
`24 as well as some hiccups in terms of being
`25 able to move products forward in their
`
`1 for a lot of small companies, in that
`2 role wore several different hats and had
`3 a broad range of responsibilities as it
`4 related to clinical development. And
`5 over the years moved into more of a
`6 clinical project management role and then
`7 finally into my current role.
`8 Q. Okay. And was your initial
`9 title, what was it, director of
`10 therapeutic area, project management?
`11 A. So that was not my first title
`12 at Regeneron.
`13 Q. Okay. What was your first
`14 title?
`15 A. My recollection is that my
`16 first title was senior clinical trial
`17 manager. But the director of therapeutic
`18 area project management was a promotion
`19 into a broader clinical project
`20 management role.
`21 Q. And then did you ever have any
`22 individuals who reported to you in those
`23 roles?
`24 A. At the time that I was a
`25 clinical trial manager I had a group of
`
`Page 11
`
`1 pipeline. And at the time I was working
`2 both on a product they had in development
`3 for oncology as well as ophthalmology.
`4 And when the company conducted a round of
`5 layoffs I personally was not laid off,
`6 but it certainly signaled some
`7 uncertainty in the company's future. I
`8 made a decision to start looking
`9 potentially for another position.
`10 At the time I was already
`11 living in the New York area and Regeneron
`12 was very much in the news because of
`13 their -- because of the VEGF-Trap
`14 molecule and their work in oncology. And
`15 so I networked with a friend of mine and
`16 contacted a few people in the company to
`17 see if they had a need for somebody with
`18 my background. Dr. Jesse Cedarbaum was
`19 the person who hired me first at
`20 Regeneron.
`21 Q. And then what was your initial
`22 role and responsibilities at Regeneron?
`23 A. So when I joined the company I
`24 joined as a senior clinical trial
`25 manager. And then as is true, I think,
`
`Page 13
`1 people that reported to me who, who were
`2 more junior clinical trial managers and
`3 involved in the operations of the
`4 clinical trials.
`5 Q. Okay. How do you differentiate
`6 what your role was versus what you call
`7 the operations of the clinical trials?
`8 A. So within clinical research,
`9 there are several people who contribute
`10 to any aspect of conducting a clinical
`11 trial. So the actual operations of the
`12 clinical trial, which includes everything
`13 from ensuring that clinical study sites
`14 are identified and trained appropriately
`15 to providing supplies for the clinical
`16 study sites, to deciding which
`17 laboratories to use or how labs will be
`18 collected. That typically is considered
`19 part of the operations role. So they're
`20 really, that, you know, they really
`21 oversee the actual execution of the
`22 clinical trials.
`23 Q. Okay. And then who -- when you
`24 were at Regeneron, say, in the -- when
`25 you first joined Regeneron, who was
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`4 (Pages 10 - 13)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 5
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 6 of 90 PageID #:
`28048
`
`Page 14
`
`Page 16
`
`1 responsible for the actual design of
`2 clinical trials?
`3 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`4 form.
`5 You can answer.
`6 A. Could you be more specific? Do
`7 you mean broadly all clinical trials at
`8 Regeneron or are you asking specifically
`9 about trials with VEGF-Trap.
`10 Q. Let's focus on VEGF-Trap. If I
`11 call VEGF-Trap aflibercept, is that all
`12 right as well?
`13 A. That's all right. I understand
`14 it to be the same molecule.
`15 Q. Okay. Got it. So we can focus
`16 on aflibercept?
`17 A. At the time I joined Regeneron,
`18 Dr. Jesse Cedarbaum was the vice
`19 president responsible for designing
`20 clinical trials, but all clinical trial
`21 designs were also vetted with senior
`22 management including individuals like Len
`23 Schleifer and George Yancopoulos.
`24 Q. Okay. And Len at the time was
`25 the CEO?
`
`1 seen this document in the context of my
`2 preparation for my deposition and this
`3 does appear to be the '601 patent.
`4 MS. MAZZOCHI: Great. Let me
`5 put in front of you a document that
`6 we'll mark as Defendant's Exhibit 5,
`7 U.S. Patent Number is 11,253,572, and
`8 can you confirm that Exhibit 5 placed
`9 before you is the '572 patent?
`10 (Defendant's Exhibit 5, U.S.
`11 Patent Number 11,253,572, was so
`12 marked for identification, as of this
`13 date.)
`14 MS. OBERWETTER: Can I just ask
`15 by way of exhibit numbering, are these
`16 sequential of what happened yesterday?
`17 MS. MAZZOCHI: Ellen, because we
`18 have so many depositions going on,
`19 several of the exhibits that we know
`20 are likely to get used over and over
`21 again, we've premarked them. So we're
`22 not marking the same one over and
`23 over.
`24 MS. OBERWETTER: That's fine.
`25 MS. MAZZOCHI: With different
`
`Page 15
`
`Page 17
`
`1 A. Yes, Dr. Schleifer was the CEO
`2 then as he is now.
`3 Q. And George Yancopoulos was the
`4 senior, I think, chief scientific
`5 officer?
`6 A. I actually don't remember what
`7 his title was when I joined the company,
`8 but his current title is chief scientific
`9 officer.
`10 MS. MAZZOCHI: That's fine. I
`11 would like to put in front of you a
`12 document I will mark as Defendant's
`13 Exhibit 4, which is United States
`14 patent number 10,888,601B2. If you
`15 can just confirm that's a document
`16 that was put in front of you.
`17 (Defendant's Exhibit 4, United
`18 States Patent Number 10,888,601 B2,
`19 was so marked for identification, as
`20 of this date.)
`21 Q. Have you confirmed that you
`22 have seen that document before and that
`23 Exhibit 4 is the '601 patent?
`24 (Witness reviews document.)
`25 A. I can confirm that yes I have
`
`1 numbers.
`2 MS. OBERWETTER: Okay. Makes
`3 sense.
`4 A. So, sorry, Deanne, can you ask
`5 your question again?
`6 Q. Sure. Ms. Chu, can you just
`7 confirm Exhibit 5 placed before you is
`8 the '572 patent?
`9 A. Yes, this appears to be the
`10 '572 patent.
`11 Q. And you have seen this document
`12 before?
`13 A. I have seen this document in
`14 preparation for this deposition.
`15 MS. MAZZOCHI: Okay. And let me
`16 provide you with a document that I
`17 will mark as DX 200, which is titled
`18 "Plaintiff's Rule 26(a) Initial
`19 Disclosures."
`20 (Defendant's Exhibit 200,
`21 Plaintiff's Rule 26(a) Initial
`22 Disclosures, was so marked for
`23 identification, as of this date.)
`24 Q. And can you confirm the
`25 document before you marked as DX 200 is
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`5 (Pages 14 - 17)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 6
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 7 of 90 PageID #:
`28049
`
`Page 18
`
`1 titled "Plaintiff's Rule 26(a) Initial
`2 Disclosures"?
`3 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`4 foundation.
`5 You can answer.
`6 A. So I can confirm that the
`7 document says Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)
`8 Initial Disclosures.
`9 Q. Okay. If you can take a look
`10 at the third page of the exhibit, there
`11 is a table there and the second entry in
`12 the table says Karen Chu. Let me know
`13 when you've gotten to that entry?
`14 A. I see that entry.
`15 Q. Okay. Now it states, for you,
`16 Karen Chu, that one of the subject
`17 matters that you have knowledge of is the
`18 conception and reduction of practice of
`19 the inventions disclosed and/or claimed
`20 in the '879, '338, '069, '681, '205, '601
`21 and '572 patents and the clinical
`22 properties of aflibercept.
`23 Do you see that?
`24 A. I do see that.
`25 Q. Do you know if that's a true
`
`Page 20
`1 mind, the term "conception" when it comes
`2 to any inventions disclosed?
`3 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`4 form.
`5 A. I mean, I understand the word
`6 and what it could mean.
`7 Q. Okay. What's your
`8 understanding?
`9 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`10 form.
`11 You can answer it.
`12 A. Okay. Obviously, the
`13 conception would be certainly the idea or
`14 the decision to move forward with any
`15 specific aspect of a clinical study
`16 design or development for a product.
`17 Q. And what's your understanding
`18 of the term "reduction to practice" when
`19 it comes to the inventions disclosed in
`20 the patents listed here in association
`21 with you?
`22 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`23 form and foundation.
`24 You can answer.
`25 A. I don't think I can adequately
`
`Page 19
`
`Page 21
`
`1 statement, that you have knowledge on
`2 those issues?
`3 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`4 foundation with this witness.
`5 You can answer.
`6 A. So it's difficult for me to
`7 answer this question because I don't know
`8 precisely the content of the listed
`9 patents, as well as the legal concept of
`10 conception and reduction of practice are
`11 not terms I am familiar with.
`12 Q. Okay. Well, do you have a
`13 layperson's understanding of conception
`14 and reduction to practice?
`15 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`16 form.
`17 A. I don't know what the
`18 layperson's understanding of those would
`19 be. However, I can say that my entire
`20 almost 20-year career at Regeneron was in
`21 clinical development of aflibercept.
`22 Q. Okay. All right. Well, maybe
`23 we can get at it this way.
`24 Do you have an understanding as
`25 to what it means, you know, in your own
`
`1 speak to the meaning of that phrase.
`2 Q. Right. I am just asking for
`3 your understanding. Do you have any
`4 understanding as to what that term means?
`5 MS. OBERWETTER: Same objection.
`6 A. I have a very rudimentary
`7 understanding of what that means --
`8 Q. Okay.
`9 A. -- in the context of the
`10 patent.
`11 Q. What's your understanding?
`12 MS. OBERWETTER: Same objection.
`13 A. Just that the reduction to
`14 practice of the inventions would mean how
`15 exactly the patent translates to the
`16 products used.
`17 Q. Do you have an understanding of
`18 whether you will be called to testify at
`19 trial in this case?
`20 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`21 form and foundation.
`22 A. My understanding is that I am
`23 on the witness list but I am not aware
`24 that it's been confirmed that I would be
`25 called to testify.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`6 (Pages 18 - 21)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 7
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 8 of 90 PageID #:
`28050
`
`Page 22
`
`Page 24
`
`1 Q. Okay. Do you have any
`2 understanding as to what types of issues
`3 we can expect you to offer testimony on
`4 when it comes to trial in this case?
`5 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`6 form and foundation.
`7 To the extent your answer would
`8 reveal any discussions with counsel,
`9 calls for attorney/client privileged
`10 information and work product.
`11 Q. You can answer.
`12 A. Sorry, could you ask your
`13 question again?
`14 Q. Sure. Do you have any
`15 understanding of what types of issues you
`16 will be offering -- you will be offering
`17 testimony on during trial in this case?
`18 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`19 foundation. Same objection I just
`20 made.
`21 To the extent your answer would
`22 reveal any discussions with counsel,
`23 instruct the witness not to answer.
`24 Q. You can answer.
`25 A. My understanding is that I
`
`1 exactly this witness is going to be
`2 offering factual testimony on at
`3 trial. So if she has an understanding
`4 as to why and what facts she's going
`5 to be, or what issues she's going to
`6 be discussing at trial, we have a
`7 right to know and that doesn't -- that
`8 doesn't invade any of your
`9 conversations that you may have had
`10 with her.
`11 MS. OBERWETTER: That's
`12 completely incorrect. So please reask
`13 your question and I will make the
`14 appropriate instruction.
`15 MS. MAZZOCHI: Sure.
`16 Q. Outside of any conversations
`17 that you had with counsel, do you have
`18 any understanding as to what types of
`19 issues you might be discussing at trial
`20 in this case?
`21 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`22 foundation.
`23 Q. You can answer.
`24 A. My only understanding of my
`25 role is that I would be offering --
`
`Page 23
`
`Page 25
`
`1 would be asked questions --
`2 MS. OBERWETTER: You are
`3 instructed not to answer if it
`4 would -- if it would reveal any
`5 discussions with counsel.
`6 THE WITNESS: Okay.
`7 MS. MAZZOCHI: Fine.
`8 Q. Separate and apart from your
`9 discussions with counsel, do you have any
`10 understanding as to what knowledge you
`11 are going to be offering at trial in this
`12 case?
`13 MS. OBERWETTER: Deanne, you
`14 know this is improper.
`15 MS. MAZZOCHI: Actually, Ellen,
`16 I don't know that it's improper
`17 because we, you know, she just
`18 indicated that you identified her as
`19 someone who had knowledge on
`20 conception and reduction to practice
`21 issues and she doesn't necessarily
`22 know what that means.
`23 We're in the discovery phase in
`24 a very expedited schedule. We are
`25 trying to get an understanding of what
`
`1 MS. OBERWETTER: To the
`2 extent -- Ms. Chu, to the extent your
`3 answer is informed by conversations
`4 with counsel, I will instruct you not
`5 to answer.
`6 THE WITNESS: Okay.
`7 A. I would prefer not to answer
`8 based on counsel instructions.
`9 Q. Well, are you saying that you
`10 have no information to give outside of
`11 any conversations you had with legal
`12 counsel?
`13 A. In regards to this specific
`14 topic, that is correct.
`15 Q. And just with regard to your
`16 role or experience with aflibercept, to
`17 the extent it might relate to any of
`18 these patents, you don't have any
`19 knowledge or understanding outside of
`20 your conversations with counsel as to
`21 what topics or issues you might have
`22 knowledge of to testify about at trial?
`23 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`24 form and foundation of the question.
`25 MS. MAZZOCHI: You can answer.
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`7 (Pages 22 - 25)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 8
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 9 of 90 PageID #:
`28051
`
`Page 26
`
`Page 28
`
`1 A. Can you ask the question again,
`2 please?
`3 MS. MAZZOCHI: Yeah, I will ask
`4 the court reporter to repeat it,
`5 please.
`6 (The record was read as follows:
`7 "Question: And just with regard
`8 to your role or experience with
`9 aflibercept, to the extent it might
`10 relate to any of these patents, you
`11 don't have any knowledge or
`12 understanding outside of your
`13 conversations with counsel as to what
`14 topics or issues you might have
`15 knowledge of to testify about at
`16 trial?")
`17 MS. OBERWETTER: Same objection.
`18 A. So outside of my conversations
`19 with counsel, I have spent almost 20
`20 years at Regeneron working on the
`21 development of aflibercept, most
`22 specifically in ophthalmology.
`23 Q. Okay. And, again, setting
`24 aside any conversations or knowledge that
`25 you gained from counsel, do you have any
`
`1 circumstances that lead to the invention
`2 of anything set forth in this '601 patent
`3 that you might testify to at trial.
`4 MS. OBERWETTER: Is there a
`5 question?
`6 MS. MAZZOCHI: Yeah, I am asking
`7 her to identify what knowledge she
`8 might have relating -- that she could
`9 potentially testify to at trial
`10 relating to the circumstances
`11 involving the inventions set forth in
`12 the '601 patent, DX 4.
`13 MS. OBERWETTER: May I suggest,
`14 do you want to just ask her what she
`15 knows instead of asking her about what
`16 she might testify to at trial?
`17 MS. MAZZOCHI: No, because,
`18 Ellen, our concern is that we don't
`19 necessarily know why this witness
`20 would be the person called to testify
`21 on various issues in connection with
`22 these patents at trial because she's
`23 not listed as the named inventor. So
`24 we want to get an understanding so
`25 we're not surprised at trial, as to,
`
`Page 27
`
`1 understanding as to what issues or topics
`2 you might be testifying about with regard
`3 to the aflibercept molecule that would be
`4 relevant to any of these patents?
`5 MS. OBERWETTER: Again, outside
`6 of any conversations with counsel, to
`7 the extent you can answer.
`8 A. Yeah, I do not have any
`9 knowledge outside of conversations with
`10 counsel.
`11 Q. Okay. Do you have any
`12 knowledge relating to the circumstances
`13 leading to the invention of what's
`14 described in the '601 patent that's
`15 before you, DX 4?
`16 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`17 form and foundation.
`18 You can answer.
`19 A. Could you be more specific
`20 about what aspect of the patent you're
`21 referring to?
`22 Q. Well, I think that's part of
`23 the problem. You know, I'm trying to get
`24 an understanding as to where you might
`25 actually have knowledge relating to the
`
`Page 29
`1 you know, what knowledge or facts she
`2 may have relating to the circumstances
`3 involving the invention of the '601
`4 patent, inventions set forth in the
`5 '601 patent.
`6 MS. OBERWETTER: There are ways
`7 that do that don't involve asking her
`8 what she would testify about at trial.
`9 I have no interest in disrupting
`10 your examination. There are ways to
`11 do it where I don't have to object
`12 every time, because you're asking her
`13 what she's going to testify about at
`14 trial, which is not something this
`15 witness possibly could know. She
`16 knows what she knows. You can ask her
`17 about what she knows.
`18 MS. MAZZOCHI: Well, I like
`19 the -- the frame of my questions
`20 stand.
`21 MS. OBERWETTER: All right.
`22 Q. You can answer.
`23 MS. OBERWETTER: What's the
`24 pending question?
`25 MS. MAZZOCHI: I'll ask the
`
`www.veritext.com
`
`Veritext Legal Solutions
`
`8 (Pages 26 - 29)
`
`888-391-3376
`
`Samsung Bioepis Exhibit 1075
`Page 9
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00061-TSK-JPM Document 432-12 Filed 04/25/23 Page 10 of 90 PageID #:
`28052
`
`Page 30
`
`Page 32
`
`1 court reporter to read it back.
`2 (The record was read as follows:
`3 "Question: I'm trying to get an
`4 understanding as to where you might
`5 actually have knowledge relating to
`6 the circumstances that lead to the
`7 invention of anything set forth in
`8 this '601 patent that you might
`9 testify to at trial.")
`10 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`11 form and foundation.
`12 A. So the claims in the '601
`13 patent cover methods and treatment for
`14 age-related macular degeneration,
`15 diabetic macular edema and
`16 diabetic retinopathy with aflibercept.
`17 And in my role at Regeneron, I was part
`18 of the team that designed the studies and
`19 conducted the studies related to these
`20 claims in the patent.
`21 Q. Okay. Do you have any
`22 understanding as to what part of that
`23 design process was inventive?
`24 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`25 form and foundation.
`
`1 potential advantages and designed the
`2 trial in a way that we felt we could
`3 demonstrate those unique properties to
`4 the best extent possible.
`5 Q. Do you recall any unusual
`6 obstacles or anything that you had to
`7 overcome when designing the clinical
`8 trials for aflibercept particularly with
`9 regard to uses in the eye?
`10 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`11 form. Compound. And it appears to
`12 sweep in every trial for aflibercept.
`13 Q. You can answer.
`14 A. Sorry, can you just repeat your
`15 question one more time?
`16 Q. Sure. Do you recall there
`17 being any particular obstacles or
`18 challenges that you encountered when
`19 designing any clinical trials for
`20 aflibercept in the eye?
`21 MS. OBERWETTER: Object to the
`22 form.
`23 A. So that's a very broad
`24 question. I'm not sure I can answer it
`25 adequately. Just to say that in
`
`Page 31
`
`Page 33
`
`1 A. I'm not sure I completely
`2 understand the use of the word
`3 "inventive" in your question. Could you
`4 be more specific?
`5 Q. Sure. Again, I'm just trying
`6 to get at what are identified as alleged
`7 inventions in Defendant's Exhibit 4, the
`8 '601 patent. You said that in your role
`9 you participated in the design of the
`10 studies,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket