throbber
Trials
`Matthew Traupman; Trials
`Brausa, Adam R.; Durie, Daralyn J.; "kiradavis@mofo.com"; Weires, Rebecca; Regeneron-MoFo-IPR; Ray
`Nimrod; Laura Fairneny; Zach Summers; Elliot Choi; Landon Smith; QE - Samsung Bioepis;
`MYL_REG_IPR@rmmslegal.com; lgreen@geminilaw.com; fchu@geminilaw.com; Robert Cerwinski;
`azalcenstein@geminilaw.com; bmorris@geminilaw.com
`RE: IPR2023-00884: Request for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery
`Tuesday, May 7, 2024 3:47:54 PM
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Counsel,
`
`From the Board –
`
`Per Petitioner Samsung Bioepis’s request by email on May 3, 2024, we authorize the filing of the
`requested motion for additional discovery. Petitioner may file a 5-page motion by May 14, 2024.
`Patent Owner may file a 5-page opposition to the motion within 7 days of the filing of Petitioner’s
`motion. The parties should consider and address desired conditions for additional discovery, if
`granted, and, if relevant, whether some or all of the information listed in Petitioner’s email as
`desired discovery is required, routinely discoverable subject matter under 37 C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(1)(i)
`and (iii).
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Matthew Traupman <matthewtraupman@quinnemanuel.com>
`Sent: Friday, May 3, 2024 6:24 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: Brausa, Adam R. <ABrausa@mofo.com>; Durie, Daralyn J. <DDurie@mofo.com>;
`'kiradavis@mofo.com' <kiradavis@mofo.com>; Weires, Rebecca <RWeires@mofo.com>;
`Regeneron-MoFo-IPR <Regeneron-MoFo-IPR@mofo.com>; Ray Nimrod
`<raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com>; Laura Fairneny <laurafairneny@quinnemanuel.com>; Zach
`Summers <zachsummers@quinnemanuel.com>; Elliot Choi <elliotchoi@quinnemanuel.com>;
`Landon Smith <landonsmith@quinnemanuel.com>; QE - Samsung Bioepis <qe-
`samsungbioepis@quinnemanuel.com>; MYL_REG_IPR@rmmslegal.com; lgreen@geminilaw.com;
`fchu@geminilaw.com; Robert Cerwinski <rcerwinski@geminilaw.com>;
`azalcenstein@geminilaw.com; bmorris@geminilaw.com
`Subject: IPR2023-00884: Request for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Honorable Board,
`
`Exhibit 3003
`
`

`

`Petitioner Samsung Bioepis requests leave to file a motion for additional discovery pursuant to 37
`C.F.R. § 42.51(b)(2).
`
`In its Response, Patent Owner Regeneron submitted declarations from two fact witnesses: named
`inventor Dr. George Yancopoulos and Regeneron employee Ms. Karen Chu. Based on publicly
`available court filings in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Case No.
`22-cv-61-TSK (N.D. W. Va.) (“Mylan Litigation”), Dr. Yancopoulos and Ms. Chu appeared to have
`previously provided deposition and trial testimony on subject matter that is substantially similar to
`their declarations and subsequent depositions in this IPR. Indeed, the Mylan Litigation involved the
`same ’572 patent challenged in this IPR proceeding. See Paper 55 (Joint Summary of Related
`Proceedings). Petitioner therefore seeks:
`
`1. The deposition transcript of Karen Chu from the Mylan Litigation and all exhibits thereto;
`2. The deposition transcript of George Yancopoulos from the Mylan Litigation and all exhibits
`thereto;
`3. The trial exhibits from the Mylan Litigation cited in the trial testimony of Karen Chu and/or
`George Yancopoulos;
`4. The following trial exhibits from the Mylan Litigation cited in the court’s Memorandum
`Opinion and Order Following Bench Trial (ECF No. 692 in the Mylan Litigation) related to
`Regeneron’s clinical development of aflibercept: DTX 0213, DTX 0220, DTX 0222, DTX 0226,
`DTX 0229, DTX 0230, DTX 0232, DTX 0234.
`Petitioner first raised this issue with Patent Owner on April 16, and following several attempts at
`resolving the issue, Patent Owner only today indicated that it will oppose Petitioner’s request.
`
`If a conference call would be helpful to the Board, counsel for both parties are available on Tuesday
`May 7 from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET or Thursday May 9 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. ET, or at the Board’s
`convenience.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Matthew Traupman
`Backup Counsel for Petitioner Samsung Bioepis
`
`Matthew Traupman
`Partner
`Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
`
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`212-849-7322 Direct
`212-849-7000 Main Office Number
`212-849-7100 FAX
`matthewtraupman@quinnemanuel.com
`www.quinnemanuel.com
`
`NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
`named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If
`the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
`notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
`strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original
`message.
`
`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket