`571.272.7822
`
`
`Paper 38
`Date: March 11, 2024
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD., CELLTRION, INC., and
`BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-008841
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, ROBERT A. POLLOCK, and
`RYAN H. FLAX, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FLAX, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`SECOND MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2024-00260 and IPR2024-00298 were joined with IPR2023-00884.
`See Papers 31 and 33.
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`
`
`Further to the original Scheduling Order entered November 24, 2023
`(Paper 14), this Order sets modified due dates for the parties to act after
`institution of the proceeding. Modified due dates are shown underlined in
`the following Appendix. The modified due dates include those provided in
`the parties’ stipulated changes to schedule (Paper 28) and a change in Due
`Date 8 (Oral Argument, if requested) to August 23, 2024. No other changes
`to the original Scheduling Order are ordered.
`
`
`It is hereby
`ORDERED that the schedule of the proceeding is modified as shown
`in the Appendix to this Order.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`DUE DATE 1 ..................................................................... February 23, 2024
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`DUE DATE 2 ............................................................................ May 17, 2024
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`DUE DATE 3 ............................................................................ June 28, 2024
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)2
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................... July 8, 2024
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`DUE DATE 5 ............................................................................. July 26, 2024
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`Motion to exclude evidence
`DUE DATE 6 .......................................................................... August 2, 2024
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for prehearing conference
`DUE DATE 7 .......................................................................... August 9, 2024
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 8 ........................................................................ August 23, 2024
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`2 If Patent Owner files neither a reply to Petitioner’s opposition to the MTA
`nor a revised MTA, see Section III(C) of the Original Scheduling Order.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`
`For PETITIONER SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD.:
`
`Raymond N. Nimrod
`Matthew A. Traupman
`Landon Andrew Smith
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`matthewtraupman@quinnemanuel.com
`landonsmith@quinnemanuel.com
`qe-samsungbioepis@quinnemanuel.com.
`
`
`For PETITOINER CELLTRION, INC.:
`
`Lora Green
`Yahn Lin Chu
`GEMINI LAW LLP
`lgreen@geminilaw.com
`fchu@geminilaw.com
`
`
`For PETITIONER BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC.:
`
`Paul Molino
`Jeffrey Marx
`Neil McLaughlin
`Steven Birkos
`Deanne Mazzochi
`Thomas Ehrich
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`paul@rmmslegal.com
`jmarx@rmmslegal.com
`nmclaughlin@rmmslegal.com
`sbirkos@rmmslegal.com
`dmazzochi@rmmslegal.com
`tehrich@rmmslegal.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Adam R. Brausa
`Rebecca Weires
`Kira Davis
`Daralyn Durie
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`ABrausa@mofo.com
`RWeires@mofo.com
`kiradavis@mofo.com
`ddurie@mofo.com
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
