`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________
`
`SAMSUNG BIOEPIS CO., LTD.
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`Patent No. 11,253,572
`
`_______________
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2023-00884
`____________________________________________________________
`
`JOINT NOTICE OF STIPULATION TO MODIFY DUE DATES 1-3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`Further to the Scheduling Order (Paper 14), entered November 24, 2023,
`
`Petitioner, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., and Patent Owner, Regeneron
`
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “the Parties”) have met and conferred and reached
`
`an agreement regarding certain dates set forth in the Scheduling Order. Accordingly,
`
`the Parties agree and hereby jointly stipulate to modify DUE DATES 1-31 as follows:
`
`Due Date
`
`Original Due Date
`
`New Agreed Due Date
`
`DUE DATE 1
`
`Patent Owner’s Response
`
`DUE DATE 2
`
`Petitioner’s Reply
`
`DUE DATE 3
`
`Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply
`
`February 9, 2024
`
`February 23, 2024
`
`May 3, 2024
`
`May 17, 2024
`
`June 14, 2024
`
`June 28, 2024
`
`1 The Scheduling Order (Paper 14) recites that the Parties may only stipulate to
`
`different dates for portions of DUE DATES 1-3. The stipulated changes to the
`
`Scheduling Order, therefore, apply only to the portion of DUE DATE 1 related to
`
`Patent Owner’s Response, DUE DATE 2 related to Petitioner’s Reply, and DUE
`
`DATE 3 related to Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply.
`
`(cid:20)
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`A marked-up copy of the Scheduling Order is enclosed. As further agreed
`
`upon, Patent Owner files this Joint Notice of Stipulation to Modify Due Dates 1-3 on
`
`behalf of both Parties.
`
`Dated: 1/16/2024
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Adam R. Brausa/
`Adam R. Brausa, Reg. No. 60,287
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`425 Market Street
`San Francisco, California 94105
`Tel: (415) 268-6053
`ABrausa@mofo.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`(cid:21)
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`
`Certificate of Service (37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(4))
`
`I hereby certify that the attached JOINT NOTICE OF STIPULATION TO
`
`MODIFY DUE DATES 1-3 was served as of the below date via e-mail (by
`
`agreement) to the following counsel of record for the Petitioner:
`
`Raymond N. Nimrod (Reg. No. 31,987)
`Matthew A. Traupman (Reg. No. 50,832)
`Elliot Choi (pro hac vice to be applied for)
`Zachariah Summers (pro hac vice to be applied for)
`Sarah Cork (pro hac vice to be applied for)
`Landon Andrew Smith (Reg. No. 79,248)
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`51 Madison Ave., 22nd Floor
`New York, NY 10010
`raynimrod@quinnemanuel.com
`matthewtraupman@quinnemanuel.com
`elliotchoi@quinnemanuel.com
`zachsummers@quinnemanuel.com
`landonsmith@quinnemanuel.com
`qe-samsungbioepis@quinnemanuel.com
`
`Dated: 1/16/2024
`
`/Adam R. Brausa/
`Adam R. Brausa, Reg. No. 60,287
`
`(cid:22)
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00884
`Patent 11,253,572 B2
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`February 23, 2024
`
`DUE DATE 1 ............................................................. February 9, 2024
`
`Patent Owner’s response to the petition
`
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`May 17, 2024
`DUE DATE 2 ................................................................... May 3, 2024
`
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
`
`June 28, 2024
`
`DUE DATE 3 ................................................................. June 14, 2024
`
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)5
`
`DUE DATE 4 .................................................................... July 8, 2024
`
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`DUE DATE 5 .................................................................. July 26, 2024
`
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................... August 2, 2024
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................... August 9, 2024
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`DUE DATE 8 .............................................................. August 16, 2024
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`5 If Patent Owner files neither a reply to Petitioner’s opposition to the MTA
`nor a revised MTA, the parties are directed to Section III(C) above.
`
`12
`
`