throbber
Carl Sechen
`
`Professor
`Dept. of Electrical Engineering
`University of Texas at Dallas
`carl.sechen@utdallas.edu
`972-835-1611
`
`Research Interests
`My research interests center primarily on the design and computer-aided design of digital and
`analog integrated circuits. Ongoing projects include fast, accurate simulation-based timing
`analysis. Also, the design of secure ICs that cannot be reverse engineered. One aspect of this is
`the design of novel types of embeddable field-programmable circuits for design obfuscation. We
`are also working on reverse engineering of PCBs that are damaged and/or discarded.
`
`Education
`Ph.D., Electrical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1986
`Thesis: Placement and Global Routing of Integrated Circuits Using Simulated
`Annealing
`Advisor: Prof. Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli
`M.S., Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1977
`Advisor: Prof. Stephen Senturia
`B.E.E., Electrical Engineering, University of Minnesota, 1975
`
`Employment history
`Professor, University of Texas at Dallas August 15, 2005 – present
`Professor, University of Washington July 1999 – August 14, 2005
`Associate Professor, University of Washington July 1992 – June 1999
`Associate Professor, Yale University July 1990 – June 1992
`Assistant Professor, Yale University July 1986 – June 1990
`
`University Administrative Positions
`Director of ECS Tech Support Services, UTD, June 2012 – February 2014
`
`Honors and Awards
` Best Paper Award at the 2017 IEEE PhD Research in Microelectronics and Electronics Con-
`ference (PRIME), for the paper “Improved Lagrangian Relaxation-based Gate Size and VT
`Assignment for Very Large Circuits”, Bariloche, Argentina, February 2017.
` Nominated for a Best Paper Award for: “A Field Programmable Transistor Array Featuring
`Single-Cycle Partial/Full Dynamic Reconfiguration”, Proc. of Design Automation and Test in
`Europe (DATE) Conference, March 27-31, 2017, Lausanne, Switzerland.
` Nominated for UTD’s President's Teaching Excellence Award for Graduate/Professional In-
`struction, 2020.
` Received the Distinguished Teaching Award for the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and
`Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, 2014.
` Received the Distinguished Teacher of the Year Award, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Erik
`Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, 2008.
` Elected IEEE Fellow in 2002
` Received the Outstanding Research Advisor Award, Department of Electrical Engineering,
`University of Washington, 2002.
`
`INTEL-1004
`8,010,740
`
`

`

` Received the Best Project Award, NSF Center for the Design of Digital and Analog ICs
`(CDADIC), July 2002.
` Received the Semiconductor Research Corporation’s 2001 SRC Inventor’s Recognition Award
` Received the Semiconductor Research Corporation’s 1994 SRC Technical Excellence Award
` Received the Semiconductor Research Corporation’s 1988 SRC Inventor's Recognition Award
`
`
`Litigation Support Experience
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Patent litigation
`Latham Watkins
`Cannot disclose
`
`pending
`Started August 2021
`
`Patent litigation
`Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe
`Cannot disclose
`
`pending
`Started August 2020
`
`Patent litigation
`Anova Law Group, PLLC
`Cannot disclose
`
`pending
`Started August 2021
`
`Patent litigation
`Perkins Coie
`Cannot disclose
`
`pending
`Started October 2021
`
`Patent ligitation
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (“WilmerHale”)
`Civil Action No. 6:19-cv-404-ADA FLASH-CONTROL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. IN-
`TEL CORPORATION; IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
`Expert consultation on behalf of Intel
`pending
`Started January 2020
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`

`

`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent litigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`Arigna Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG et al.,
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00054-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation and testimony
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent litigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`Arigna Technology Limited v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al.,
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00172-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent litigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`Arigna Technology Limited v. Porsche AG, et al.,
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00173-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent litigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`Arigna Technology Limited v. General Motors Company, et al.,
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00174-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent litigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`Arigna Technology Limited v. Daimler AG, et al.,
`Case No. 2:21-cv-00175-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`
`
`

`

`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`ITC Investigation
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`In The Matter of Certain Power Inverters and Converters,
`Vehicles Containing the Same and Components Thereof,
`Inv. No. 337-TA-1267 (ITC)
`Services Provided: Expert consultation and testimony
`Disposition:
`Pending
`Date:
`Started 12/06/2020
`
`IPR filing
`Kirkland & Ellis LLP
`Case 1:19-cv-01006-UNA IPR PACT XPP Schweiz AG v. Intel Corporation
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
`DELAWARE
`Expert consultation toward the filing of an IPR on behalf of Intel
`pending
`Started December 2019
`
`IPR filing
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (WilmerHale)
`VLSI Technology, LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 3:17-cv-05671-BLF (N.D.
`Cal.),
`VLSI Technology, LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 1:18-cv-00966-CFC-CJB (D.
`Del.) VLSI Technology, LLC v. Intel Corporation, No. 6:19-cv-00256-ADA
`(W.D. Tex.)
`Two declarations in support of an Intel IPR and two depositions
`pending
`Started May 1, 2019, ended July 30, 2020
`
`Patent infringement and associated IPR filing
`Baker Botts (DC case) and Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. (IPR case)
`Case No. 1:18-cv-555-LY
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS, LTD., an
`Ireland limited company,
`Plaintiff,
`v.
`ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC
`Filing a declaration in support of the IPR and planning for the district court case
`Case dissolved
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`
`

`

`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Started Febrary 2019; ended May 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trade secret case before an Arbitration Panel
`Anova Law Group
`TVL International LLC v. Zhejiang Shenghui Lighting Co., Ltd.
`
`Case No. 01-17-0004-7802
`AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
`CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
`
`
`
`In the matter of arbitration between
`
`
`TVL INTERNATIONAL LLC,
`
`
`Claimant,
`
`
`
`
`
`v .
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZHEJIANG SHENGHUI
`
`
`
`LIGHTING CO., LTD. and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SENGLED USA, INC.
`
`Three expert reports completed, and testimony before the Arbitration Panel
`Ended with TVL declared the winner
`April 9, 2018 through August 31, 2018.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Challenge of Patent Validity
`Weil, Gotshal and Manges; but in the future: Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`North Star Innovations, Inc. v Micron Technology, Inc., et al., Case 17-cv-506-
`LPS-CJB,
`D. Del.
`Research in support of an IPR regarding Patent 5,943,274 on behalf of Micron
`In progress but no work performed to date
`March 5, 2018 through present
`
`Challenge of Patent Validity
`Baker Botts
`Advanced Micro Devices v. Broadcom
`One declaration in support of an IPR regarding Patent 7,472,151
`Case No. Unassigned
`Patent 7,472,151
`____________
`DECLARATION OF DR. CARL SECHEN IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR
`INTER PARTES REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,472,151
`Settled not long after the IPR was filed
`December 3, 2016 through March 27, 2017
`
`Trade Secret Misappropriation
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`
`

`

`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`
`GSI Technology, Inc. v. United Memories, Inc. and Integrated Silicon Solution,
`Inc.;
`Case No. 5:13-cv-1081-PSG in the United States District Court for the Northern
`District of California, San Jose Division
`One declaration on behalf of ISSI, one deposition and one trial testimony before
`a jury
`ISSI was victorious at trial and upon appeal
`May 2014 through November 2015
`
`Patent validity – PTO re-examination proceedings
`Bruce Itchkawitz, Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear; Rich Kim, Mehran Arjomand,
`and David Kim, Morrison & Foerster LLP
`Netlist, Inc. vs. Google, Inphi Corp., and Smart Modular Technologies
`Individual cases in the last 5 years:
`1. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00667
`2. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00549
`3. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00692
`4. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00562
`5. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00561
`6. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00587
`7. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2017-00560
`8. Appeal No. 2015-006849
`9. Appeal No. 2015-007761
`10. Inter Partes Review No. 2015-01021
`11. Reexamination Control No.: 95/001,337
`12. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-0097
`13. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-00970
`14. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-01011
`15. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-00883
`16. Inter Partes Review No. IPR2014-00883
`17. Appeal No. 2013-009044
`
`
`
`25 declarations, 5 depositions on behalf of Netlist, Inc., filed July 2011 through
`May 2015 supporting patent validity challenges before the PTO
`Worked on 6 separate IPR's, each involved writing an expert report and giving a
`deposition.
`Pending
`June 28, 2011 through March 2018
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent invalidity and patent non-infringement
`Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati (representing the defendant)
`HSM Portfolio, LLC, Technology Properties Limited, LLC v.
` Advanced Micro Devices (defendant)
`Case: 1:11-cv-00770-RGA (D. Del.)
`Services Provided: Work toward declaration on patent non-infringement
`Disposition:
`Settled in defendant’s favor
`Date:
`April 2013 through December 2013
`
`

`

`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Patent non-infringement
`Jones Day (representing the defendant)
`Intellectual Ventures v. Xilinx (defendant)
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Plaintiffs,
`v.
`ALTERA CORPORATION, MICROSEMI
`CORPORATION, LATTICE
`SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and
`XILINX, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 10-1065 (LPS)
`(CONSOLIDATED)
`One declaration on patent non-infringement; one deposition
`Settled in defendants’ favor
`February 2013 through April 2014
`
`Patent non-infringement
`Morrison Foerster (representing the defendant)
`Intellectual Ventures v. Altera (defendant)
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Plaintiffs,
`v.
`ALTERA CORPORATION, MICROSEMI
`CORPORATION, LATTICE
`SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and
`XILINX, INC.,
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 10-1065 (LPS)
`(CONSOLIDATED)
`One declaration on patent non-infringement; one deposition
`Settled in defendant’s favor
`February 2013 through December 2013
`
`Patent validity and patent infringement
`Antonelli, Harrington & Thompson LLP
`Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd., Plaintiff, v. Acer America Corp, et al., De-
`fendants.
`
`

`

`Cases:
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10-CV-597-LED
`Case No. 2:13-CV-08369 PSG (PLAx)
`
`
`
`One declaration on patent validity and two declarations on patent infringement
`Settled in Plaintiff’s favor
`February 2013 through March 2015
`
`Services Provided:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Patent infringement
`Type of Matter:
`Winston & Strawn (Nanya)
`Law Firm:
`On Technologies vs. Nanya
`Case Name:
`Services Provided: Work on claim term definitions
`Disposition:
`Case was transferred from East. Dis. Texas to No. Calif. in late 2010; then set-
`tled
`March 2010 through October 2010
`
`Date:
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`
`Patent infringement
`White and Case (Panasonic)
`Freescale Semiconductor vs. Panasonic
`Invalidity and non-infringement expert reports filed November 2010; deposition
`December 2, 2010
`ITC case settled January 2011
`April 2010 through January 2011
`
`Patent infringement
`Weil, Gotshal and Manges (Samsung)
`Rambus vs. Samsung
`One Declaration, One Deposition, and one trial testimony for Samsung
`
`Declaration:
`This report overviewed Rambus technology and patents, their alleged “steering”
`of patent claims, and Samsung’s subsequent DDR products.
`Deposition:
`Dr. Sechen was asked to consider whether Samsung’s subsequent DDR products,
`DDR2, DDR3, GDDR, GDDR2, GDDR3, and GDDR4 fell within the scope of
`their 2000 license agreement with Rambus. Representing attorney: Matt An-
`tonelli.
`Trial Testimony:
`Dr. Sechen testified before Judge Ronald Whyte, San Jose, CA, that Samsung’s
`subsequent DDR products, DDR2, DDR3, GDDR, GDDR2, GDDR3, and
`GDDR4 fell within the scope of their 2000 license agreement with Rambus.
`Representing attorney: Matt Antonelli.
`
`Dr. Sechen’s involvement completed on 30 September 2008 with the conclusion
`of the trial.
`
`

`

`Date:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`May 2008 through September 2008
`
`Patent infringement
`O’Melveny & Myers (Magma)
`Synopsys vs. Magma Design Automation
`Two Declarations, One Supplemental Declaration and Two Depositions for
`Magma
`
`Declaration:
`June 10, 2005: Dr. Sechen illustrated that the material in the Synopsys patents
`(originally patented by Magma, but awarded to Synospys by the court) were put
`into the public domain by Magma. In addition, he illustrated that the material in
`the Synopsys patents were generally in the public domain prior to the patents.
`
`Declaration:
`Dr. Sechen wrote a declaration supporting Magma’s proposed claim construc-
`tions for the two patents involved on July 21, 2005.
`
`Supplemental Declaration:
`July 13, 2005 Dr. Sechen had a supplemental declaration showing that Synop-
`sys’ expert report in fact was consistent and in agreement with his first declara-
`tion.
`
`Deposition:
`Aug. 10, 2005: Dr. Sechen was deposed on the July 21, 2005 declaration. Rep-
`resenting attorney: Mark Miller.
`
`Deposition:
`Dec. 16, 2005: Dr. Sechen was deposed on the June 10, 2005 declaration and on
`the supplemental declaration of July 13, 2005. Representing attorney: Mark Mil-
`ler.
`
`
`Settled after court made several rulings in Magma’s favor
`Started January 2005; Ended January 2006
`
`Trade Secret Misappropriation and Patent Enforcement
`Susman Godfrey
`UniRAM Technology vs. Monolithic System Technology and TSMC
`3 Expert Reports, 1 Declaration and 2 Depositions, and 2 trial testimonies for
`UniRAM.
`
`Expert Report:
`May 19, 2005: Expert report covered claim construction issues
`
`Declaration:
`
`

`

`May 19, 2005: Declaration in support of plaintiff UniRAM’s response to
`TSMC’s motion for summary judgment of inequitable conduct. (Subject of the
`2nd trial testimony.)
`
`Expert Report:
`May 31, 2007: Expert report that concluded that the UniRAM trade secrets were
`not and are not generally known, and that the UniRAM trade secrets created sig-
`nificant value for the defendants.
`
`Expert Rebuttal Report:
`Expert rebuttal report filed on June 13, 2007.
`
`Deposition:
`June 21, 2005: Deposition concerning expert report of May 19, 2005. Repre-
`senting attorney: Russ Chorush.
`
`Deposition:
`June 28, 2007: Deposition regarding expert report of May 31, 2007 and to a
`lesser degree the May 19, 2005 declaration. Representing attorney: Russ Cho-
`rush.
`
`Trial Testimony:
`September 2007 trial concerning Dr. Sechen’s expert report of May 31, 2007.
`Representing attorneys: Russ Chorush (Heim, Payne and Chorush) and Joseph
`Grinstein (Susman Godfrey).
`
`Trial Testimony:
`January 2008 regarding my declaration of May 19, 2005. Representing attorneys:
`Russ Chorush (Heim, Payne and Chorush) and Joseph Grinstein (Susman God-
`frey). The presiding judge specifically commented on Dr. Sechen’s credibility in
`his final judgment.
`
`
`
`$32 million judgment for UniRAM
`Started February 2005; Ended January 15, 2008
`
`Patent validity and infringement (both to PTO and trial)
`Squire, Sanders and Dempsey (Hitachi)
`Translogic vs. Hitachi
`4 expert reports, 2 declarations, 1 deposition and trial testimony for Hitachi
`
`Expert Disclosure Statement:
`Expert disclosure statement of July 25, 2003.
`Dr. Sechen was retained by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP, counsel for de-
`fendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and Renesas Technology America,
`Inc. (collectively “Hitachi”) to compare claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,162,666
`(“the ‘666 Patent”) with certain technical references which were prior art to the
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`
`

`

`‘666 Patent. Plaintiff Translogic Technology, Inc. (“Translogic”) asserted claims
`of the ‘666 Patent against Hitachi.
`
`Supplemental Expert Disclosure:
`Supplemental expert disclosure statement of September 19, 2003.
`Dr. Sechen was retained by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP, counsel for de-
`fendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and Renesas Technology America,
`Inc. (collectively “Hitachi”) to compare claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,162,666
`with certain technical references which were prior art. Dr. Sechen supplemented
`the Expert Disclosure Statement he previously submitted in this case based on
`his review of the Report and Recommendation of Special Master Regarding
`Claim Construction.
`
`Expert Disclosure Statement:
`Expert disclosure statement of February 9, 2004.
`Dr. Sechen was retained by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP, counsel for de-
`fendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and Renesas Technology America,
`Inc. (collectively “Hitachi”) to analyze certain circuits in Hitachi microproces-
`sors that Translogic Technology, Inc. (“TTI”) accuses of infringing Patent No.
`5,162,666 (“the ‘666 Patent”). Dr. Sechen was also asked to review aspects of
`the design and design process for these Hitachi products.
`
`Supplemental and Restated Expert Disclosure Statement:
`Supplemental and restated expert disclosure statement of September 20, 2004.
`Dr. Sechen was retained by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP, counsel for de-
`fendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and Renesas Technology America,
`Inc. (collectively “Hitachi”) to analyze certain circuits in Hitachi microproces-
`sors that Translogic Technology, Inc. (“TTI”) accuses of infringing Patent No.
`5,162,666 (“the ‘666 Patent”). Dr. Sechen was also asked to review aspects of
`the design and design process for these Hitachi products. This report supple-
`ments my earlier expert disclosure statement, however, it is written as a substi-
`tute for that earlier report. This revision now uses the multiplexer drawing con-
`vention used by Hitachi, which is different from the standard U.S. convention.
`
`Declaration in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment:
`Declaration in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, April
`2004. Dr. Sechen was asked to analyze certain circuits in Hitachi microproces-
`sors that Translogic Technology accused of infringing their patent No.
`5,162,666. Dr. Sechen was also asked to review aspects of the design and design
`process for these Hitachi products.
`
`Second Declaration in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judg-
`ment:
`Second declaration in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,
`September 20, 2004. Dr. Sechen was asked to analyze certain circuits in Hitachi
`microprocessors that Translogic Technology accused of infringing their patent
`No. 5,162,666. Dr. Sechen was also asked to review aspects of the design and
`design process for these Hitachi products.
`
`Deposition:
`
`

`

`Aug. 18, 2003: Dr. Sechen was deposed on all of the above-mentioned expert
`disclosures and declarations. Representing attorneys: Nathan Lane and David
`Elkins of Squire, Sanders and Dempsey, as well as Alan Loudermilk of
`Loudermilk Associates.
`
`Trial Testimony:
`January 2004: Representing attorneys: Nathan Lane and David Elkins of Squire,
`Sanders and Dempsey, as well as Alan Loudermilk of Loudermilk Associates.
`
`
`Concluded, PTO ruled in favor of Hitachi but court ruled in favor of Translogic.
`July 2003 to September 2004
`
`Trade Secret Theft
`Keker and Van Ness (Cadence)
`Cadence vs. Avanti
`Two Declarations and One Deposition for Cadence
`
`Declaration:
`Short declaration that verified and substantiated the findings of other Cadence
`experts.
`
`Declaration:
`Dr. Sechen submitted a very long reply declaration that compared an Avanti
`software product to a Cadence software product, and showing that the products
`were not in the public domain.
`
`Deposition:
`Deposition focused primarily on the reply declaration. Representing attorney:
`Michael Page.
`
`Concluded
`July 1995 to July 1996
`
`
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services Provided:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Graduated Ph.D. Students
`1. Kai-Win Lee (Yale May 1990) “Global Routing of Row-Based Integrated Circuits”.
`2. Dahe Chen (Yale May 1992) “Mickey: A Graph-Based Macro-Cell Global Router”.
`3. Mark Chiang (Yale May 1992) “A Perturbation Approach to the Symbolic Analysis of An-
`alog Circuits”.
`4. William Swartz (Yale May 1993) “Automatic Layout of Analog and Digital Mixed
`Macro/Standard Cell Integrated Circuits”.
`5. Ted Stanion (Yale May 1994) “Boolean Algorithms for Combinational Synthesis and Test
`Generation”.
`6. Kalapi Roy (University of Washington June 1994) “A Timing-Driven Multi-Way Partition-
`ing System for Integrated Circuits and Multi-Chip Systems”.
`7. Jer-Jaw Hsu (University of Washington December 1994) “Fully Symbolic Analysis of Large
`Analog Integrated Circuits”.
`8. Wern-Jieh Sun (University of Washington December 1994) “Effective and Efficient Place-
`ment for Very Large Integrated Circuits”.
`9. Qicheng Yu (University of Washington March 1995) “Approximate Symbolic Analysis of
`Large Analog Integrated Circuits”.
`10. Bingzhong David Guan (University of Washington August 1996) “Automatic Layout Gen-
`eration of Static CMOS Combinational Cells and Blocks”.
`11. Eugene Liu (University of Washington, December 1997) “Global Routing and Pin Assign-
`ment for Multi-layer Chip-level Layout”.
`12. Hsiao-Ping Tseng (University of Washington, December 1997) “Detailed Routing Algo-
`rithms for VLSI Circuits”.
`13. Gin Yee (University of Washington, June 1999) “Dynamic Logic Design and Synthesis Us-
`ing Clock-Delayed Domino”.
`14. Tyler Thorp (University of Washington, December 1999), “Design and Synthesis of Dy-
`namic Circuits”.
`15. Tatjana Serdar (University of Washington, December 2000), “Automatic Datapath Tile
`Placement and Routing”.
`16. Jovanka Ciric (University of Washington, August 2001), “Boolean Matching and Level-
`Based Technology Mapping”.
`17. Yi Han (University of Washington, December 2004), “A High-Performance CMOS Pro-
`grammable Logic Core for System-on-Chip Applications”.
`18. Hiran Tennakoon (University of Washington, August 2005), “Efficient and Accurate Gate
`Sizing With Piecewise Convex Delay Models”.
`19. Miodrag Vujkovic (University of Washington, March 2006), “Efficient Fully-Automated,
`Refinement-Based Power-Delay Optimization Design Flow for Standard Cell Designs”.
`20. Kian Hour (Alfred) Chong (University of Washington, June 2006), “Self-Calibrating Differ-
`ential Output Prediction Logic”.
`21. Xinyu (Sunny) Guo (University of Washington, June 2006), “ A High-Throughput Divider
`Based on Output Prediction Logic”.
`22. Sheng Sun (University of Washington, August 2006), “High Performance and Energy Effi-
`cient Adder Design”.
`23. Mohammad Rahman (UT-Dallas, December 2011), “Power and Leakage Minimization for
`Digital ICs”.
`24. Chiu-Wei Pan (UT-Dallas, August 2012), “High Speed and Power Efficient Compression of
`Partial Products”.
`25. Zhao Wang (UT-Dallas, October 2012), “Accurate Wire Endpoint Delay Estimation”.
`26. Akshay Sridharan (UT-Dallas, October 2015), “STARK: Synchronous to Asynchronous Re-
`design Kit”.
`27. Anitha Yella (UT-Dallas, January 2016), “Power Optimization in ICs”.
`
`

`

`28. Meisam Roshan (UT-Dallas, September 2016), “A MEMS-Assisted Dual-Resonator Tem-
`perature-to-Digital Converter”.
`29. Huihua (Helen) Huang (UT-Dallas, May 2018), “A 0.1ps Resolution Coarse-Fine Time-to-
`Digital Converter with 2.21ps Single-Shot Precision”.
`30. Jingxiang (Amelie) Tian (UT-Dallas, December 2019), “Transistor-level Programmable
`Fabric”.
`31. Bo Hu (UT-Dallas, March 2021), “Thermal-Aware Placement and High Level Synthesis For
`Hardware Security”.
`32. Lubaba Nahar, (UT-Dallas, July 2022), “CAD Tools for PCB Reverse Engineering and IC
`Interconnect”.
`33. Qiongdan (Olivia) Huang, (UT-Dallas, July 2022), “Toward Accurate Timing Analysis of
`Transistor-Level Programmable Fabric”.
`34. Xiangyu Xu, (UT-Dallas December 2022), “Routing Methods for Transistor-level Program-
`mable Fabrics”.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Current Ph.D. Students
`1. Vibhav Kumarswami Salimath, Ph.D. expected 12/23
`2. Apurva Jain, Ph.D. expected 12/23
`3. Thomas Broadfoot, Ph.D. expected 12/23
`4. Jinkun Feng, Ph.D. expected 06/26
`5. Amir Hossein Torabi, Ph.D. expected 05/27
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Teaching Activities
` Yr
`Qtr
`Course
`1992 Aut
`EE538
`1993 Win
`EE356
`1993 Spr
`EE535
`1993 Sum EE332
`1993 Aut
`EE538
`1993 Aut
`EE332
`1994 Win
`EE433
`1994 Spr
`EE476
`1994 Aut
`EE538
`1994 Aut
`EE433
`1995 Win
`EE476
`1995 Spr
`EE473
`1995 Aut
`EE476
`1996 Win
`EE535
`1996 Spr
`EE538
`1996 Aut
`EE476
`1997 Win
`EE477
`1997 Win
`EE541
`
`Brief Title, Credits, #students
`Auto Layout, 4 credits, 20 students
`Analog ICs, 4 credits, 55 students
`VLSI Design, 4 credits, 25 students
`Analog ICs, 5 credits, 35 students
`Auto Layout, 4 credits, 15 students
`Analog ICs, 5 credits, 40 students
`Analog MOS ICs, 4 credits, 65 students
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 55 students
`Auto Layout, 4 credits, 15 students
`Analog MOS ICs, 4 credits, 55 students
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 85 students
`Adv. Analog MOS, 5 credits, 45 students
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 85 students
`VLSI Design, 4 credits, 55 students
`Auto Layout, 4 credits, 15 students
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 125 students
`Custom Dig ICs, 4 credits, 45 students
`Auto Layout, 4 credits, 20 students
`
`Stud. Opin. Survey
`4.38/4.08
`3.21/3.00
`4.27/4.47
`3.57/3.48
`3.60/3.50
`3.93/3.90
`3.96/4.08
`3.89/3.89
`3.63/3.63
`4.32/4.30
`3.75/3.85
`3.53/3.59
`4.40/4.20
`4.10/4.00
`4.30/4.50
`3.40/3.40
`4.30/4.10
`4.70/4.70
`
`

`

`VLSI Design, 4 credits, 20 students
`EE535
`1997 Spr
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 60 students
`EE476
`1997 Aut
`Custom Dig ICs, 4 credits, 60 students
`1998 Win EE477
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 60 students
`1998 Spr
` EE476
`Digital VLSI Design, 4 credits, 35 stud.
`1998 Spr
` EE535
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 35 students
`1998 Aut
` EE476
`Custom Dig ICs, 4 credits, 55 students
`1999 Win EE477
`Digital VLSI Design, 4 credits, 35 stud.
`1999 Spr
` EE535
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 50 students
`1999 Aut
` EE476
`Custom Dig ICs, 4 credits, 55 students
`2000 Win EE477
`Digital VLSI Design, 4 credits, 35 stud.
`2000 Spr
` EE535
`Digital ICs, 5 credits, 125 students
`2000 Aut
` EE476
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 75 students
`2001 Win EE477
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 25 students
`2001 Win EE525
`VLSI III, 4 credits, 50 students
`2001 Spr
` EE526
`VLSI I, 5 credits, 150 students
`2001 Aut
` EE476
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 75 students
`2002 Win EE477
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 25 students
`2002 Win EE525
`VLSI III, 4 credits, 50 students
`2002 Spr
` EE526
`VLSI I, 5 credits, 150 students
`2002 Aut
` EE476
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 55 students
`2003 Win EE477
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 25 students
`2003 Win EE525
`VLSI III, 4 credits, 32 students
`2003 Spr
` EE526
`VLSI I, 5 credits, 30 students
`2003 Aut
` EE476
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 12 students
`2004 Win EE477
`VLSI II, 5 credits, 7 students
`2004 Win EE525
`VLSI III, 4 credits, 12 students
`2004 Spr
` EE526
`VLSI I, 5 credits, 65 students
`2004 Aut
` EE476
`2005 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 42 students
`2006 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 20 students
`2006 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 66 students
`2007 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 15 students
`2007 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 40 students
`2008 Spr
` EE4325
`Introduction to VLSI Design, 40 students
`2008 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 19 students
`2008 Sum EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 36 students
`2008 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 40 students
`2009 Spr
` EE4325
`Introduction to VLSI Design, 22 students
`2009 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 37 students
`2009 Sum EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 17 students
`2009 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 67 students
`2010 Spr
` EE4325
`Introduction to VLSI Design, 25 students
`2010 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 35 students
`2010 Sum EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 17 students
`2010 Sum EE3320 Digital Circuits, 3 units, 17 students
`2010 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 77 students
`2011 Spr
` EE4325
`Introduction to VLSI Design, 37 students
`2011 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 17 students
`2011 Sum EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 16 students
`2011 Sum EE3320 Digital Circuits, 3 units, 26 students
`2011 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 91 students
`
`3.83/4.00
`3.88/3.89
`3.66/3.61
`3.39/3.50
`3.57/3.94
`4.15/4.50
`4.00/3.94
`3.79/4.13
`4.70/4.70
`4.53/4.27
`4.35/4.44
`4.20/4.19
`4.30/4.37
`4.25/4.50
`4.35/4.50
`4.1/4.2
`4.1/4.1
`4.1/4.1
`3.6/3.3
`3.7/3.6
`3.4/3.8
`3.6/3.3
`3.3/3.5
`4.5/4.6
`3.2/3.7
`2.2/2.2
`3.2/3.2
`3.8/3.9
`4.4/4.6
`4.5/4.3
`4.4/4.2
`4.5/4.2
`4.8/4.6
`3.5/3.4
`4.6/4.4
`4.0/3.7
`4.1/4.1
`4.2/3.9
`3.7/3.6
`4.1/4.0
`4.3/4.0
`4.6/4.5
`4.4/4.4
`4.7/4.5
`4.1/3.8
`4.4/4.2
`4.0/4.1
`4.2/4.2
`4.14
`4.13
`4.73
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Introduction to VLSI Design, 27 students
` EE4325
`2012 Spr
` EE7325 Advanced VLSI Design, 3 units, 17 students
`2012 Spr
`2012 Sum EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 35 students
`2012 Sum EE3311
`Electronic Circuits, 3 units, 22 students
`2012 Fall
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 144 students
`2013 Spr
` EE6325 VLSI Design, 3 units, 41 students
`2013 Spr
` EE4325
`Introduction to VLSI Design, 7 students
`2013 S

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket