Petitioner’s Demonstratives
`
`Netflix, Inc. v. GoTV Streaming, LLC
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,989,715 & 8,478,245
`IPR2023-00757 & -00758
`
`August 6, 2024
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`
`
`Netflix, Inc. v. GoTV Streaming, LLC
`U.S. Patent Nos. 8,989,715 & 8,478,245
`IPR2023-00757 & -00758
`
`August 6, 2024
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`
`
`Instituted Grounds
`
`Challenged Claims
`1-20
`
`Challenged Claims
`1-33
`
`’715 Patent
`Basis
`§ 103(a)
`
`’245 Patent
`Basis
`§ 103(a)
`
`References
`Hariki, Harris
`
`References
`Hariki, Harris
`
`’715: Pet. at 2; ID at 19, 106.
`’245: Pet. at 2; ID at 19, 106.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`2
`
`
`
`Disputed Issues
`
`Hariki’s UI content package is associated with the web server application and is applied
`to render content in a manner customized to that application
`
`“Application” should not be narrowed to “Remote Application”
`
`HTML is generated in part from execution of Hariki/Harris’ web browser
`
`Hariki’s UI content package is applicable to HTML within the web browser
`
`Hariki’s web server application resides with a UI Authoring Tool on a server as a library
`
`Harris’s MCF is a layout solver that generates and transmits HTML files
`
`No objective indicia of non-obviousness
`
`Hariki’s engines read HTML files sent to a wireless device
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent. No. 8,989,715
`
`’715
`
`’715: EX1001 at (10), (54), (63); Pet. at 18; POPR at 2.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`4
`
`POPR at 2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent. No. 8,478,245
`
`’245
`
`’245: EX1001 at (10), (22), (54); Pet. at 17; POPR at 2.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`5
`
`POPR at 2
`
`
`
`’715/’245 Patents – Problem to be Solved
`
`’715
`
`Diverse wireless device platforms required
`multiple, tailored versions of an application
`
`’715: EX1001 at 2:18-32; Pet. at 12-17.
`’245: EX1001 at 2:21-35; Pet. at 12-16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`6
`
`’715 Patent at 2:18-32
`
`
`
`Patents’ Solution – Generic Application & Custom Configuration
`
`’715
`
`Content compiled by a generic application is
`used at the client to render a tailored display
`
`’715: EX1001 at 3:4-23; Pet. at 12-17.
`’245: EX1001 at 3:7-25; Pet. at 12-16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`7
`
`’715 Patent at 3:4-23
`
`
`
`Patents’ Solution – Generic Application & Custom Configuration
`
`’715: EX1001 at Fig. 1B; Pet. at 12-17.
`’245: EX1001 at Fig. 1B; Pet. at 12-16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`8
`
`’715 Patent at Fig. 1B
`
`
`
`The Patents Claim Well-Known Technology
`
`Bederson
`Petitioner’s Expert
`
`Bederson Decl. at ¶ 56
`
`EX1002 at ¶¶ 56-57; Pet. at 8-9.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`9
`
`Bederson Decl. at ¶ 57
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0150617 (“Hariki”)
`
`“Hariki”
`
`’715: EX1006 at (10), (43), (54), (60).
`’245: EX1005 at (10), (43), (54), (60).
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`10
`
`
`
`Overview of Hariki
`
` Hariki discloses a user interface authoring
`tool 104 and a resource application
`programming interface (API) on a mobile
`device
`
` Server 102 “can be a World-Wide Web
`(WWW) server that stores data in the
`form of web pages and transmits these
`pages as Hypertext Markup Language
`(HTML) files over the Internet 110.”
`
`Hariki at ¶¶ 20, 21, 24
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶¶ 20, 21, 24; Pet. at 19-21.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶¶ 20, 21, 24; Pet. at 18-20.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`11
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0023755 (“Harris”)
`
`“Harris”
`
`’715: EX1007 at (10), (43), (54), (60).
`’245: EX1006 at (10), (43), (54), (60).
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`12
`
`
`
`Overview of Harris
`
` Harris discloses delivery of content
`to multiple mobile devices using
`different device protocols
`
` MCF content is “tailored to take
`into account the limited resources
`of certain devices such as mobile
`devices”
`
` “Content is first translated into
`WAX from the original language of
`the content provider, … and then
`converted into a device appropriate
`language for a requesting mobile
`device,” such as HTML
`
`Harris at ¶¶ 7, 14-15
`
`’715: EX1007 at ¶¶ 7, 14-15; Pet. at 21-24.
`’245: EX1006 at ¶¶ 7, 14-15; Pet. at 20-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`13
`
`
`
`Custom Configuration Associated with an Application
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`14
`
`
`
`1
`
`Hariki Discloses the Claimed “Application” in Two Ways
`
`Web server as “application”
`
`Web browser as “application”
`
`“application”
`(web server)
`
`“application”
`(web browser)
`
`’715: EX1006 at Fig. 1; Pet. at 35-37.
`’245: EX1005 at Fig. 1; Pet. at 35-37.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`15
`
`
`
`1
`
`Hariki/Harris Discloses the Application on the Server
`
`Hariki/Harris teaches a web server running on server 102
`to provide web pages, such as Harris’s translated WAX, to a client
`
`* * *
`
`Hariki at ¶ 21
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶ 21; EX1007 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 38-40.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶ 21; EX1006 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 37-38.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`16
`
`Harris at ¶ 24
`
`
`
`1
`
`Custom Configuration Is Applied to the Content, Not the Application
`
`Claims require that the custom configuration customizes
`the compiled content but not the application itself
`
`’715: EX1001 at cl. 1; ID at 66; Reply at 15-16.
`’245: EX1001 at cl. 1; ID at 65-66; Reply at 16.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`17
`
`
`
`1
`
`Custom Configuration Is Applied to the Content, Not the Application
`
`custom configuration
`
`compiled content
`
`Server Computer
`
`Client Device
`
`Rendering Blocks
`
`’715: Pet. at 12-17; Reply at 2-5.
`’245: Pet. at 12-16; Reply at 2-5.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`18
`
`
`
`1
`
`Custom Configuration Is Applied to the Content through Rendering Blocks
`
`Experts agree that the custom configuration arrives separately
`on the client device to support customization of the compiled content
`
`“in order to practice the claim as it’s written, the custom configuration needs
`to be there before the application starts sending content to the rendering
`blocks.”
`
`Lipoff Dep. at 23:12-16
`
`“[Content provider] would understand [] that the UI skin would be sent to a
`client along with content such as HTML content from a server, and those
`things together would support the customization of that HTML content.”
`
`Bederson Dep. at 63:11-16
`
`Lipoff
`PO’s Expert
`
`Bederson
`Petitioner’s Expert
`
`’715: EX1025 at 23:12-16; EX2031 at 63:11-16; ID at 66; Reply at 17.
`’245: EX1029 at 23:12-16, EX2029 at 63:11-16; ID at 65-66; Reply at 17.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`19
`
`
`
`1
`
`Custom Configuration is Related to the Application
`
`Compiled content and a custom configuration from the server
`are used by the client device to generate renderable content
`
`’715 Patent at 18:56-61
`
`’715 Patent at 18:62-19:3
`
`’715: EX1001 at 18:56-19:3; Pet. at 48-49.
`’245: EX1001 at 18:57-19:4, Pet. at 42.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`20
`
`
`
`1
`
`Hariki Teaches a UI Skin “Associated with” the Web Server Application
`
`Association is commonsense conclusion when the same provider
`provides both the web application content and the configuration
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 30-35; Reply at 15-16.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 31-35; Reply at 16-17.
`
`Hariki at ¶ 24
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`21
`
`
`
`1
`
`’715 Patent and Hariki Share the Same Objective
`
`’715 Patent at 7:56-63
`
`’715 Patent at 18:40-42
`
`Hariki at ¶¶ 8-9
`
`’715: EX1001 at 7:56-63, 18:40-42; EX1006 at ¶¶ 8-9; Pet. at 15; Reply at 16-17.
`’245: EX1001 at 7:59-66, 18:41-43; EX1005 at ¶¶ 8-9; Pet. at 15; Reply at 17.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`22
`
`
`
`1
`
`Customization Is Defined by the Association with the Application
`
`PO improperly and unnecessarily seeks to add the limitation that the
`custom configuration is “created for” each requested application
`
`’715: Reply at 2-5.
`’245: Reply at 2-5.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`23
`
`’715 Reply at 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`Claims Already Dictate the Nature and Role of the Custom Configuration
`
`PO’s “created for” construction has no basis in the claims
`
`What it is:
`
`What it does:
`
`wherein said custom configuration is associated with an application
`and
`configures said plurality of rendering blocks to render content in a manner
`customized to said application
`
`What it is:
`
`What it does:
`
`… receive a custom configuration that is associated with an application,
`...
`wherein said custom configuration is operable to configure said plurality of
`rendering blocks to render content in a manner customized to said
`application
`
`’715 patent, claims 1, 9; ’245 patent, claims 1,12, 23
`
`’715: EX1001 at cls. 1, 9; Reply at 2-5.
`’245: EX1001 at cls. 1, 12, 23; Reply at 2-5.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`24
`
`
`
`1
`
`Custom Configuration Need Not Be “Created for” the Application
`
`Specification does not teach a mandatory one-to-one relationship –
`there would be no optionality, no selection, and no versions
`
`’715 Patent at 2:51-54
`
`’715 Patent at 3:9-14
`
`’715: EX1001 at 2:51-54, 3:9-14, 11:62-64; Reply at 2-5.
`’245: EX1001 at 2:54-57, 3:12-17, 11:64-66; Reply at 2-5.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`25
`
`’715 Patent at 11:62-64
`
`
`
`Prior Art Application Need Not Be Remote from the Client
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`26
`
`
`
`2
`
`’715 (claims 1 and 9) and ’245 Do Not Limit the Transmitting Element
`
`These claims do not specify what element transmits,
`and are certainly not limited to the application transmitting
`
`1. A method of generating content that is renderable by a
`wireless device, said method comprising:
`
`transmitting, to said wireless device, an identification of a
`custom configuration …; and
`
`transmitting, to said wireless device, compiled content …
`
`? ?
`
`PO seeks to require the “application” transmitting without any basis,
`despite the claims being conspicuously open-ended
`
`’715 patent, claim 1
`
`’715: EX1001 at cls. 1, 9; Reply at 5-11.
`’245: EX1001 at cls. 1, 12, 23; Reply at 5-11.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`27
`
`
`
`2
`
`’715 (claims 1 and 9) and ’245 Do Not Limit the Transmitting Element
`
`PO’s “construction” is result driven
`to overcome Hariki’s web browser as the claimed application
`
`1. A method of rendering content on a wireless device, said method
`comprising:
`
`receiving
`
`from ?
`
`an identification of a custom configuration …;
`
`receiving
`
`from ?
`
`compiled content …;
`
`PO seeks to add the “application” transmitting without any basis,
`despite the claims being conspicuously open-ended
`
`’245 patent, claim 1
`
`’715: EX1001 at cls. 1, 9; Reply at 5-11.
`’245: EX1001 at cls. 1, 12, 23; Reply at 5-11.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`28
`
`
`
`2
`
`Claims Do Not Limit the Transmitting Element
`
`PO’s testimony does not preclude the
`web server as transmitter and web browser as application
`
`In both cases the compiled content needs to be something
`that’s external to the wireless device, the wireless client, the wireless
`device, wireless client running and the wireless device, it needs to
`come from a source that’s external in order for it to be transmitted to
`in the case of ’715, or received by in the case of the ’245.
`
`Lipoff Dep., 48:20-49:4
`
`Lipoff
`PO’s Expert
`
`’715: EX1025 at 48:20-49:4; Reply at 5-11.
`’245: EX1029 at 48:20-49:4; Reply at 5-11.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`29
`
`
`
`2
`
`Hariki/Harris Discloses HTML from the Server to the Device
`
`The identity of the “claimed application” is immaterial
`to the transmitting/receiving limitations
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶ 21; Reply at 14-21.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶ 21; Reply at 15-21.
`
`Hariki at ¶ 21
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`30
`
`
`
`2
`
`Claim Differentiation Undermines PO’s Position
`
`Claims 3 and 11 of the ’715 patent first introduce the limitation
`that the application resides on a remote server
`
`“[T]he presence of a dependent claim that adds a particular
`limitation gives rise to a presumption that the limitation in
`question is not present in the independent claim.”
`
`Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1315 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
`
`’715: EX1001 at cls. 1, 3, 9, 11; Reply at 5-11.
`’245: EX1001 at cls. 1, 4, 12, 15, 23, 26; Reply at 5-11.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`31
`
`
`
`Compiled Content Is Generated in Part
`from Browser Execution
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`32
`
`
`
`3
`
`PO’s Proposal Reads “Execution” Out of the Plain Language
`
`PO’s result-driven construction makes the application the
`source of content rather than specifying an event for its creation
`
`generated how?
`
`Claim:
`
`compiled content is generated in part from execution of said application
`
`upon execution
`
`PO:
`
`said application produces/outputs some part of the compiled content during its execution
`
`by the application
`
`surplusage since an application
`would not output unless executing
`
`’715: EX1001 at cls. 1, 9; Reply at 11-14.
`’245: EX1001 at cls. 1, 12, 23; Reply at 12-14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`33
`
`
`
`3
`
`Compiled Content Is Generated Upon Execution of a Web Browser
`
`Consistent with the claim language, a web browser request for HTML
`triggers a web server to generate HTML files
`
`’715: EX1001 at 6:22-31, cls. 1, 9; Reply at 11-14.
`’245: EX1001 at 6:26-35, cls. 1, 12, 23; Reply at 12-14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`34
`
`’715 Patent at 20:48-57
`
`
`
`3
`
`PO’s Expert Supports the Plain Language Reading
`
`Mr. Lipoff acknowledges that a well-known meaning of
`“generated” includes the side effect of execution
`
`Lipoff
`PO’s Expert
`
`’715: EX2022 at ¶ 100; Reply at 11-14.
`’245: EX2022 at ¶ 94; Reply at 12-14.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`35
`
`’715 Lipoff Decl. at ¶ 100
`
`
`
`3
`
`Harris/Hariki Discloses Generation Upon Execution of a Browser
`
`Hariki
`
`Harris
`
`* * *
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶ 21; EX1007 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 43-44; ID at 78-80; Reply at 19-20.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶ 21; EX1006 at ¶ 24; Pet. at 37-38; ID at 69-71; Reply at 19-20.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`36
`
`Harris at ¶ 24
`
`Hariki at ¶ 21
`
`
`
`Hariki’s UI Skin Is Applicable to the Received HTML
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`37
`
`
`
`4
`
`Hariki Teaches Application-Level Customization
`
`UI skin allows the web browser to access resources
`for application-level customization of received HTML
`
`Hariki at ¶ 9
`
`Hariki at ¶ 19
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶¶ 9, 19; ID at 62-63; Reply at 21-22.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶¶ 9, 19; ID at 62; Reply at 21-22.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`38
`
`
`
`4
`
`Hariki’s UI Skin Is Applicable to the Received HTML
`
`The resources are accessed by applications, such as a web browser,
`to configure rendering blocks to render content
`
`Hariki at ¶ 24
`
`Hariki at ¶ 42
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶¶ 24, 42; ID at 62-63; Reply at 21-22.
`’245: EX1005 at ¶¶ 24, 42; ID at 62; Reply at 21-22.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`39
`
`
`
`Prior Art Discloses a Library and Layout Solver
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`40
`
`
`
`5
`
`PO Misunderstands the Petition Regarding ’715/17[a] and [b]
`
`Hariki teaches
`multiple applications
`through the UI
`authoring tool,
`including the web
`server
`
`UI authoring tool
`supports creation of
`multiple UI skins
`
`At least one UI skin is
`customized to the web
`server application as in
`claim 1[b]
`
`’715 patent, claim 17
`
`’715: EX1001 at cl. 17; Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`41
`
`
`
`5
`
`Hariki Discloses a Library of Applications
`
`In cited ¶ 27, Hariki teaches that the
`UI authoring tool hosts:
` UI content objects, such as “…data or
`applications” and
` Processing units in server 102
`o “…application programs, …, program
`components, or any other content or executable
`objects” (¶ 21)
`o “a web server process to serve web pages over
`network 110 (¶ 21)
`
`The UI authoring tool can include other web
`applications hosted through the web server
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶¶ 21, 27; Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`42
`
`Hariki at ¶ 27
`
`
`
`5
`
`Hariki Discloses a Library of Custom Configurations
`
`There is no apparent dispute about availability of multiple UI skins
`
`Hariki at ¶ 28
`
`’715: EX1006 at ¶¶ 28, 31-32; Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`43
`
`Hariki at ¶ 31-32
`
`
`
`6
`
`Harris’s MCF Reads on the Layout Solver of ’715/17[c]
`
`The ’715 patent teaches that the layout solver translates the template and
`claim 17[c] requires that the layout solver transmit compiled content
`
`’715 Patent at 3:54-57
`
`’715 Patent at 17:56-59
`
`’715: EX1001 at 3:54-57, 17:56-59; Pet. at 69-72; Reply at 23-24.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`44
`
`
`
`6
`
`Harris’s MCF Reads on the Layout Solver of ’715/17[c]
`
`MCF translates WAX and responds to page requests in HTML
`
`* * *
`
`* * *
`
`’715: EX1002 at ¶ 137; EX1007 at ¶¶ 24, 27; Pet. at 67-69; Reply at 23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`45
`
`Harris at ¶ 24
`
`Harris at ¶ 27
`
`
`
`No Objective Indicia of Non-Obviousness
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`46
`
`
`
`7
`
`PO Has No Evidence for Vast Majority of Claims at Issue
`
`Verdict (on appeal) only involved claims 1 and 4 of the ’715 patent
`
`’715: EX3003 at 3.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`47
`
`Verdict Form at 3
`
`
`
`7
`
`Nexus Requires More Than Just Use of an Invention
`
`“Commercial success is relevant to obviousness only if there
`is a ‘nexus ... between the sales and the merits of the claimed
`invention.’ There must be ‘proof that the sales were a direct
`result of the unique characteristics of the claimed invention—
`as opposed to other economic and commercial factors
`unrelated to the quality of the patented subject matter.’”
`
`In re Applied Materials, Inc., 692 F.3d 1289, 1299-1300 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (citations omitted)
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`48
`
`
`
`7
`
`PO Admits Commercial Success Is Only Partially Attributable
`
`PO concedes that delivery is only part of Netflix’s business and
`fails to explain the value of content to a content delivery service
`
`’715 POR at 57
`
`’715: POR at 57; Reply at 25-26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`49
`
`
`
`7
`
`PO Fails to Make a Prima Facie Case of Objective Indicia
`
`Even if commercial success could be attributable solely to claim 4
`of the ’715 patent (it is not), PO ignores content in content delivery
`
`’715: POR at 58; Reply at 25-26.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`50
`
`’715 POR at 58
`
`
`
`Hariki’s Engines Read the Received HTML
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`51
`
`
`
`8
`
`Hariki/Harris Teaches the Engine of ’245 Patent Claim 23(g)
`
`Hariki discloses engine processing of linked resources in compiled content
`
`Bederson | Petitioner’s Expert
`
`Hariki at ¶ 43
`
`Bederson Dep. at 75:1-6
`
`’245: EX1002 at ¶ 140-43; EX1005 at ¶ 43; EX2029 at 75:1-6; Pet. at 42-46; Reply at 22-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`52
`
`
`
`8
`
`Hariki/Harris Teaches the Engine of ’245 Patent Claim 23(g)
`
`“an engine for reading” should not be limited to parsing the base HTML file
`
`Bederson
`Petitioner’s Expert
`
`* * *
`
`’245: EX1002 at ¶ 140-43; EX1005 at ¶ 43; EX2029 at 75:22-76:17;
`Pet. at 42-46; Reply at 22-23.
`
`Bederson Dep. at 75:22-76:4,76:10-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`53
`
`
`
`8
`
`Hariki/Harris Teaches an Engine for Reading Compiled Content
`
`PO misapprehends the interaction between the web browser and engines
`
`Harris’s HTML
`including JPEG
`links
`
`Browser would
`send at least the
`link if not the
`retrieved image
`data for JPEG
`processing
`
`’245: EX1005 at Fig. 5; Pet. at 54-55; ID at 101; Reply at 22-23.
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`54
`
`Hariki at Fig. 5
`
`
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`55
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`56
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`57
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`58
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`59
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`60
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`61
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`62
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`63
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`64
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`65
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`66
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`67
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`68
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`69
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`70
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`71
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`72
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`73
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`74
`
`
`
`’715 Patent, Claim 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`75
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`76
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`77
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`78
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 4
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`79
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 5
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`80
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 6
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`81
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 7
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`82
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 8
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`83
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`84
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`85
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 11
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`86
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 12
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`87
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 13
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`88
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`89
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 15
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`90
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 16
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`91
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`92
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 18
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`93
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 19
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`94
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 20
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`95
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 21
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`96
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`97
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 23
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`98
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 24
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`99
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`100
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 26
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`101
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`102
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 28
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`103
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 29
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`104
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 30
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`105
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 31
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`106
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 32
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`107
`
`
`
`’245 Patent, Claim 33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT – NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1030
`
`108
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
