Judge Lee Yeakel
`
`Judge Lee Yeakel
`
`3
`
`JURY TRIALS
`
`By the Numbers
`
`Accusations
`Asserted Patents
`Cases
`Claim Constructions
`Filings
`Parties
`
`1
`
`BENCH TRIALS
`
`Determinations
`Infringed
`Invalid
`Not infringed
`Not invalid
`Not unenforceable
`Unenforceable
`Non-Stipulated
`Stipulated
`
`2,643
`596
`404
`796
`23,563
`1,392
`
`Patent Cases by Technology Center
`12
`1600 Biotechnology and Organi..
`11
`1700 Chemical and Materials E..
`2400 Networking, Multiplexing, ..
`2800 Semiconductors/Memory, ..
`2900 Design
`3600 Transportation, Constructi..
`3700 Mechanical Engineering, ..
`Computers, Communication, an..
`Unclassified/Unknown
`
`4
`
`80
`
`60
`
`41
`
`21
`
`205
`
`17
`
`Clicking a technology center will filter charts on the page to show only cases involving patents of that technology. Summary
`figures at the top will be unaffected.
`
`Outcomes
`
`Show Outcomes
`Non-Merits Dismissal
`Patent Challenger Won
`Patentee Won
`Settled/Voluntarily Dismissed
`
`Lee Yeakel
`Patentee Won
`10.53% (2)
`
`All values
`
`77
`
`RULE 12 DISMISSALS
`
`35
`
`GRANTED TRANSFERS
`
`11
`33
`16
`43
`13
`3
`
`Remedies
`
`Aggregate damages $ a..
`
`Largest damages award
`
`Permanent injunctions
`
`Non-Stipulated
`Stipulated
`
`349,061,570
`
`174,530,785
`
`16
`
`46
`
`48
`
`38
`
`25
`
`28
`
`26
`
`28
`
`24
`
`24
`
`20
`
`18
`
`13
`
`Patent Cases
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`8
`
`4
`
`4
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`2022
`
`US District Courts
`Mixed
`6.57% (230)
`Patentee Won
`20.84% (730)
`
`19
`Cases
`
`Patent Challenger Won
`89.47% (17)
`
`3,503
`Cases
`
`Patent Challenger Won
`72.59% (2,543)
`
`47
`
`34
`
`21
`21
`21
`20
`
`17
`16
`
`13
`11
`10
`
`99
`
`888
`
`7
`
`666
`
`Patentee Firms
`DiNovo Price
`Rabicoff Law
`Prince Lobel Tye
`Nelson Bumgardner Conr..
`Kizzia Johnson
`Bracewell
`Taylor Dunham and Rodr..
`Sand Sebolt & Wernow
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulb..
`Winstead
`Kowert Hood Munyon Ra..
`OhanianIP
`Bayko Prebeg Faucett & ..
`Wong Cabello Lutsch Rut..
`Watts Guerra
`Edmonds & Schlather
`Wittliff Cutter
`Whiteford Taylor Preston
`Weltchek Mallahan & We..
`Toler Law Group
`All
`
`12
`12
`
`11
`11
`
`10
`10
`10
`
`9
`
`8
`
`7777
`
`6666
`
`6
`
`5
`
`Patentees
`Uniloc USA, Inc.
`Uniloc Luxembourg SA
`Freescale Semiconductor..
`DDB Technologies, LLC
`Uniloc 2017 LLC
`Symbology Innovations L..
`Lucio Development LLC
`Bandspeed, LLC
`Bandspeed, Inc.
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`Launchip LLC
`David Byrd
`Andrew Katrinecz
`Via Vadis, LLC
`Shipping and Transit, LLC
`Dynamic 3D Geosolution..
`AC Technologies, SA
`A PTY Ltd.
`VOIT Technologies, LLC
`All
`
`Termination Year
`
`Patent Challenger Won
`Patentee Won
`
`Parties & Firms
`These charts show the total number
`of cases parties or firms appeared in
`Patent Cases assigned to the
`selected judge.
`
`Party Role
`Patentee
`Patent Challenger
`
`Filter Parties
`HAE
`Non-HAE
`
`HAE
`Non-HAE
`
`Local Counsel
`National Firm
`
`To learn more about how Docket Navigator determines which parties should be classified as Highly Assertive Entities or local counsel visit: https://search.docketnavigator.com/help/glossary.html/
`
`Milestones
`
`Choose a Milestone
`Trials
`
`Milestone Subcategories
`Bench Trial
`Jury Trial
`
`Time to Trials in the Lee Yeakel
`
`Median: 959.0 days
`Mean: 1,021 days
`
`0
`
`50
`
`100
`
`150
`
`200
`
`250
`
`300
`
`350
`
`400
`
`450
`
`500
`
`550
`
`600
`
`650
`
`700
`
`750
`
`800
`
`850
`
`900
`
`950
`
`1000
`
`1050
`
`1100
`
`1150
`
`1200
`
`1250
`
`1300
`
`The chart displays the number of days from the case filing date to Trials. After applying all relevant filters, cases shown in this chart were filed from 2014 to 2022. The stripe in the middle of the box plot represents the
`median, while the "Upper Hinge" and "Lower Hinge" (the "sides" of the box) are roughly equivalent to the 25th and 75th percentiles.
`
`Motion Pendency
`
`None
`
`Time to None
`
`Median: None days
`Mean: None days
`
`The chart displays the number of days for None to rule on None. The stripe in the middle of the box plot represents the median, while the "Upper Hinge" and "Lower Hinge" (the "sides" of the box) are roughly equivalent to the 25th and 75th percentiles. After
`applying all relevant filters, cases displayed in this chart were filed from None. The median number of days from motion filing to the selected milestones is None.
`Technology Centers: All
`
`Cisco Exhibit 1017
`Cisco et al. v. LS Cloud Storage Technologies
`IPR2023-00733, Page 1 of 1
`
`