`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 64
`Date: June 18, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., DR. REDDY’S
`LABORATORIES, INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD., SUN
`PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., AND SUN
`PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`NOVO NORDISK A/S,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2023-007241
`Patent 10,335,462 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2024-00009 (Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories) and IPR2024-00107 (Sun
`Pharmaceutical Industries) have been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00724
`Patent 10,335,462 B2
`
`Novo Nordisk, A/S, requested a conference call to discuss a one-
`month extension of all due dates, including the oral hearing date, to
`accommodate the scheduling of depositions of Petitioner’s six declarants
`that filed declarations in support of Petitioner’s Reply. See Ex. 3004.
`Petitioner did not take a position on Patent Owner’s request. Id.
`
`A conference call was held on June 6, 2024, to discuss the proposed
`changes to the schedule for this proceeding. During the conference, we
`authorized the parties to file a joint stipulation concerning the proposed due
`dates for Due Dates 3 through 7, but took under advisement the change in
`the oral hearing due date to confirm availability for an oral hearing during
`the week of August 26, 2024. Counsel confirmed that each would be
`available for an oral hearing during that week.
`
`On June 7, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation to modify Due
`Dates 3 through 7 as follows (omitting events related to a motion to amend
`that Patent Owner has agreed not to file in this proceeding). See Paper 56, 1,
`1 n.1 (“Joint Stipulation”).
`
`Due Date
`DUE DATE 3: Patent Owner’s
`sur-reply to reply
`DUE DATE 4: Request for oral
`argument
`DUE DATE 5: Motion to
`exclude evidence
`DUE DATE 6: Opposition to
`motion to exclude and Request
`for prehearing conference
`DUE DATE 7: Reply to
`opposition to motion to exclude
`DUE DATE 8: Oral argument
`
`Current Date
`July 3, 2024
`
`Proposed Due Date
`August 5, 2024
`
`June 12, 2024
`
`July 12, 2024
`
`July 8, 2024
`
`August 8, 2024
`
`July 15, 2024
`
`August 15, 2024
`
`July 18, 2024
`
`July 30, 2024
`
`August 19, 2024
`To be specified by
`the Board
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00724
`Patent 10,335,462 B2
`We have since confirmed the morning of Tuesday, August 27, 2024,
`as the date and time for oral argument should it be requested by the parties.
`We have confirmed that a requested in-person hearing will be held at the
`USPTO headquarters in Alexandria in our largest courtroom, Hearing
`Room A.
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that DUE DATE 8 for Oral Argument is set for the
`morning of Tuesday, August 27, 2024;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the the due dates set forth in the Joint
`Stipulation by the parties filed for Due Dates 3 through 7 filed on June 7,
`2024, remain in effect.
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00724
`Patent 10,335,462 B2
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Brandon M. White
`Emily J. Greb
`Courtney Prochnow
`Christopher D. Jones
`Jonathan I. Tietz
`Matthew A. Lembo
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`white-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`greb-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`prochnow-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`jones-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`tietz-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`lembo-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`Semaglutide-Ozempic@perkinscoie.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Megan Raymond
`GROOMBRIDGE, WU, BAUGHMAN & STONE LLP
`steve.baughman@groombridgewu.com
`megan.raymond@groombridgewu.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
