`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, INC.,
`
`and DR. REDDY’S LABORATORIES, LTD.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NOVO NORDISK A/S,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2023-007241
`
`Patent No. 10,335,462
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 IPR2024-00009 (Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories) has been joined with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. Sections 42.14 and 42.54, Petitioner Mylan
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Petitioner”) hereby moves to seal its Petitioner Reply and
`
`certain exhibits submitted with its Petitioner Reply as described herein. Patent
`
`Owner has advised Petitioner that it does not oppose this motion to seal.
`
`II. Good Cause Exists to Seal the Petitioner Reply Response and Supporting
`Exhibits
`
`Pursuant to the Protective Order proposed by Patent Owner as Exhibit 2079,
`
`Petitioner moves to seal (i) its Petitioner Reply submitted concurrently with this
`
`motion; and (ii) the following exhibits:
`
` EX1308
`
` EX1311
`
` EX1312
`
` EX1314
`
` EX1323
`
`Patent Owner has previously moved to file certain documents under seal.
`
`Paper 28. Petitioner’s Reply and the above-listed exhibits address information filed
`
`under seal by Patent Owner. Accordingly, it is necessary for Petitioner to file these
`
`documents under seal.
`
`Petitioner has concurrently filed its Petitioner Reply and the above-listed
`
`exhibits and served confidential versions on Patent Owner. Petitioner will file
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`redacted versions of the Petitioner Reply and the above-listed exhibits upon
`
`receiving any redactions Patent Owner believes are necessary.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Board grant
`
`this motion to seal.
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2024
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`700 Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
`202.654.6200 (phone)
`202.654.6211 (fax)
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Brandon M. White/
`Lead Counsel
`Brandon M. White, Reg No. 52,354
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served a true and
`
`correct copy of the foregoing: PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SEAL by email to
`
`the electronic service addresses for Patent Owner and Petitioner in IPR2024-
`
`00009:
`
`J. Steven Baughman
`Megan Raymond
`Jenny C. Wu
`Michael Milea
`Philip S. May
`Joshua Reich
`GROOMBRIDGE, WU, BAUGHMAN &
`STONE LLP
`steve.baughman@groombridgewu.com
`megan.raymond@groombridgewu.com
`jenny.wu@groombridgewu.com
`mike.milea@groombridgewu.com
`philip.may@groombridgewu.com
`Joshua.reich@groombridgewu.com
`Novo-Semaglutide-
`IPR@groombridgewu.com
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 22, 2024
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`700 Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 800
`Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
`202.654.6200 (phone)
`202.654.6211 (fax)
`
`
`
`
`
`Jovial Wong
`Scott Border
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLC
`jwong@winston.com
`sborder@winston.com
`
`
`
`
`/Brandon M. White/
`Lead Counsel
`Brandon M. White, Reg No. 52,354
`
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
