throbber
0021-972X/04/$15.00/0
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 89(6):3055–3061
`Copyright © 2004 by The Endocrine Society
`doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031403
`
`Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Induces Natriuresis in Healthy
`Subjects and in Insulin-Resistant Obese Men
`
`JEAN-PIERRE GUTZWILLER, STEFAN TSCHOPP, ANDREAS BOCK, CARLOS E. ZEHNDER,
`ANDREAS R. HUBER, MONIKA KREYENBUEHL, HEIKE GUTMANN, JU¨ RGEN DREWE,
`CHRISTOPH HENZEN, BURKHARD GOEKE, AND CHRISTOPH BEGLINGER
`Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Research (J.-P.G., S.T., C.B.), and Division of Clinical Pharmacology and
`Toxicology and Department of Research (H.G., J.D.), University Hospital, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland; Central Laboratory
`and Division of Nephrology (A.B., A.R.H., M.K.), Kantonsspital Aarau, CH-5001 Aarau, Switzerland; Division of Nephrology
`(C.E.Z.), Clinica las Condes, Santiago, Chile; Division of Endocrinology (C.H.), Kantonsspital Luzern, CH-6000 Luzern,
`Switzerland; and Division of Gastroenterology and Department of Internal Medicine (B.G.), Klinikum Grosshardern,
`University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, D-81377 Munich, Germany
`
`Glucagon-like peptide-1-(7–36)-amide (GLP-1) is involved in
`satiety control and glucose homeostasis. Animal studies sug-
`gest a physiological role for GLP-1 in water and salt homeosta-
`sis. This study’s aim was to define the effects of GLP-1 on water
`and sodium excretion in both healthy and obese men.
`Fifteen healthy subjects and 16 obese men (mean body mass
`index, 36 kg/m2) were examined in a double-blind, placebo-
`controlled, crossover study to demonstrate the effects of a 3-h
`infusion of GLP-1 on urinary sodium excretion, urinary out-
`put, and the glomerular filtration rate after an iv 9.9-g salt
`load.
`Infusion of GLP-1 evoked a dose-dependent increase in uri-
`
`nary sodium excretion in healthy subjects (from 74 ⴞ 8 to 143ⴞ
`18 mmol/180 min, P ⴝ 0.0013). In obese men, there was a sig-
`nificant increase in urinary sodium excretion (from 59 to 96
`mmol/180 min, P ⴝ 0.015), a decrease in urinary Hⴙ secretion
`(from 1.1 to 0.3 pmol/180 min, P ⴝ 0.013), and a 6% decrease in
`the glomerular filtration rate (from 151 ⴞ 8 to 142ⴞ 8 ml/min,
`P ⴝ 0.022).
`Intravenous infusions of GLP-1 enhance sodium excretion,
`reduce Hⴙ secretion, and reduce glomerular hyperfiltration
`in obese men. These findings suggest an action at the proximal
`renal tubule and a potential renoprotective effect. (J Clin
`Endocrinol Metab 89: 3055–3061, 2004)
`
`EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES INDICATE that the prev-
`
`alence of obesity in the United States and other Western
`countries has been steadily rising over the past two decades,
`a trend that has been linked to changing dietary habits and
`lifestyle (1–3). Obesity is associated with a high prevalence
`of hypertension, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular disease, dia-
`betes mellitus, and other chronic diseases (4). The annual
`number of deaths attributable to obesity in the United States
`has been estimated to be 280,000 –325,000 (5).
`One of the major factors responsible for obesity-associated
`morbidity and mortality is an elevated blood pressure. The
`pathogenesis of obesity-induced hypertension has not been
`elucidated. Glomerular hyperfiltration and increased so-
`dium reabsorption in the kidney have been demonstrated
`previously in obese patients and animals (6, 7). The authors
`of these studies suggest a putative factor in obese patients
`(e.g. hyperinsulinemia, the renin angiotensin system, the
`sympathetic nervous system, or an increase in renal inter-
`stitial pressure) as being responsible for an enhanced salt
`reabsorption in the proximal tubule and the loop of Henle.
`The consequence of enhanced salt reabsorption is an increase
`
`Abbreviations: AUC, Area under the curve; CH2O, free water clear-
`ance; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1-
`(7–36)-amide; HOMA, homeostasis model assessment; IR, insulin resis-
`tance; PRA, plasma renin activity; TcH2O, free water reabsorption.
`JCEM is published monthly by The Endocrine Society (http://www.
`endo-society.org), the foremost professional society serving the en-
`docrine community.
`
`in blood pressure due to extracellular volume expansion.
`Elevated salt reabsorption at a segment proximal to the mac-
`ula densa would reduce sodium chloride delivery to the
`macula densa and initiate a rise in the glomerular filtration
`rate (GFR) through tubulo-glomerular feedback. An elevated
`GFR would tend to return distal sodium delivery to normal.
`In fact, a few studies in humans have shown that obese
`patients have an increased GFR (8, 9). Another study has
`clearly demonstrated that nondiabetic, nonhypertensive
`obese people have an elevated GFR (10).
`The pro-glucagon-derived glucagon-like peptide-1-(7–36)
`amide (GLP-1) is a gastrointestinal hormone that is released
`in response to the presence of food in the distal small intes-
`tine (11, 12). Its physiological effects include a glucose-
`dependent insulinotropic action on pancreatic ␤-cells and
`inhibition of gastric emptying. The latter effect can be inter-
`preted as being part of the ileal brake mechanism, an endo-
`crine feedback loop that becomes activated when nutrients
`are present in the ileum (12, 13). Furthermore, it has been
`suggested that GLP-1 plays a physiological regulatory role in
`controlling appetite and energy intake in normal volunteers
`and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (14 –16). As a
`result of its biological effects, GLP-1 is currently being con-
`sidered as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of
`hyperglycemia associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus
`(17–19).
`In previous studies related to the role of GLP-1 in regu-
`lating food intake, we have observed a significant reduction
`of water intake after administration of GLP-1 (15). This ob-
`
`3055
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`3056 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061
`
`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`servation has been confirmed in moderately obese patients
`with type 2 diabetes mellitus (16). Also, preliminary data in
`rats suggest a role for GLP-1 in regulating water and salt
`homeostasis (20). On the basis of this information, the present
`study was designed to investigate, in a randomized, double-
`blind, crossover fashion, the effects of GLP-1 on urinary
`sodium and hydrogen ion excretion and on glomerular fil-
`tration in both healthy volunteers and obese patients.
`
`Subjects and Methods
`
`Subjects
`
`Healthy subjects. Fifteen healthy males aged 25.5 ⫾ 0.5 yr who had a
`normal body mass index of 22.1 ⫾ 0.5 were recruited for the study.
`Each volunteer provided written informed consent. The protocol had
`been previously approved by the Human Ethics Research Committees
`of the University Hospitals of Basel and Aarau, Switzerland. Before
`being enrolled in the study, participants were required to complete a
`medical interview, undergo a full physical examination, and participate
`in an initial laboratory screening. No subject was taking any medication
`or had a history of diabetes, hypertension, or kidney disease. Two
`subjects were excluded after the screening visit because of noncompli-
`ance with the study protocol.
`Obese subjects. Sixteen obese males aged 44.6 ⫾ 3.0 yr who had body mass
`index of 36.5 ⫾ 1.2 were recruited for the study (Table 1). Each patient
`provided written informed consent. The protocol had been previously
`approved by the local Human Ethics Research Committee. Before being
`enrolled in the study, participants were required to complete a medical
`interview, undergo a full physical examination, and participate in an
`initial laboratory screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus. The screening
`included a full physical examination and an initial laboratory screening
`including urinalysis. Patients suffering from any heart disease, mi-
`croalbuminuria, or proteinuria were excluded from the study. Two
`patients had previously diagnosed type two diabetes mellitus, one pa-
`
`TABLE 1. Demographic data at screening of 16 obese subjects
`
`Characteristic
`
`Value
`44.6 ⫾ 3.0
`Age (yr)
`36.5 ⫾ 1.2
`BMI (kg/m2)
`122.6 ⫾ 2.7
`Waist circumference (cm)
`132 ⫾ 3
`Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
`74 ⫾ 2
`Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
`5.4 ⫾ 0.2
`Cholesterol (mmol/liter)
`1.7 ⫾ 0.1
`Triglycerides (mmol/liter)
`BMI, Body mass index. Data are expressed as mean ⫾ SEM.
`
`tient suffered from hypertension, and six patients had elevated plasma
`cholesterol levels. One patient was subsequently diagnosed with hy-
`pertension, and one patient was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Patients
`were kept on their daily medication throughout the study protocol.
`
`Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)
`
`Insulin resistance (IR) was determined by the HOMA (21) as follows:
`HOMA-IR ⫽ fasting serum insulin ⴱ fasting serum glucose/22.5, where
`insulin is expressed in ␮U/ml and glucose is expressed in mmol/liter
`(21). IR, as determined by this method, closely correlates with more
`complex techniques, such as the euglycemic clamp method (22).
`The index of insulin secretion was calculated as follows: ␤-cell func-
`tion ⫽ (20 ⫻ insulin)/(glucose ⫺ 3.5), where insulin is expressed in
`␮U/ml and glucose is expressed in mmol/liter.
`
`Protocols
`
`Dose response to GLP-1 in healthy subjects. For the purpose of the study,
`placebo, GLP-1 0.375 pmol/kg䡠min, and GLP-1 1.5 pmol/kg䡠min were
`infused in a random order, with infusions being separated by at least
`7 d. All solutions were administered with a concomitant iv saline load
`(Fig. 1).
`On the day of each study, volunteers had fasted from 2400 h onward
`before coming to the research unit 8 h later. The fasting state was
`assessed in the morning by an ultrasound examination of the gallblad-
`der. At 0800 h, volunteers emptied their bladders, and this was con-
`firmed by ultrasound. Afterwards, subjects were maintained supine for
`the duration of the experiment to avoid activation of the renin-angio-
`tensin system with exercise. Teflon catheters were placed into each
`forearm, one for infusions and one for blood sampling.
`After the baseline blood sample was drawn, an iv infusion of hy-
`pertonic saline was started at a rate of 0.06 ml/kg䡠min for 2 h. Simul-
`taneously, a second infusion of 0.9% saline containing albumin 0.5%
`(placebo) or one of the synthetic GLP-1 doses dissolved in 0.9% saline
`and 0.5% albumin was started and continued for 3 h. The three solutions
`were indistinguishable in appearance and were prepared by a pharma-
`cist who was not directly involved in the study. The physician in charge
`was not aware of the respective treatment, thereby permitting a double-
`blind study design. During the first 2 h ofeach experiment, no fluid
`consumption was allowed; starting with the third hour, volunteers were
`allowed to drink water ad libitum. Food intake was not permitted. At the
`end of each 180-min investigation period, water intake and the quantity
`of urine (ml) were measured; bladder emptying was confirmed by
`ultrasound.
`After starting the hypertonic saline infusion, volunteers scored their
`subjective feelings of thirst on visual analog scales at 30-min intervals
`throughout the experiments, with values ranging from 0 –100 mm. A
`score near 0 mm (at the left) for thirst indicated the subject was not thirsty
`
`FIG. 1. Urine period: urine was collected over 180 min.
`Hypertonic saline: infusion with 2.5% saline was done at
`a rate of 0.03 ml/kg䡠min. Placebo or GLP-1: infusion of
`placebo or GLP-1 (0.375 and 1.5 pmol/kg䡠min in the
`group of healthy subjects; and only the 1.5-pmol/kg䡠min
`dose in the group of obese subjects). Drinking time: vol-
`unteers were allowed to drink during 1 h (after stopping
`hypertonic saline infusion between minutes 120 and
`180). Blood samples: time points of blood sampling dur-
`ing experiment. Visual analog scale for thirst (time point
`of measurement).
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061 3057
`
`at all, and a score near 100 mm (at the right) indicated he was maximally
`thirsty. This scale has been described and validated elsewhere (17).
`Adverse effects were assessed by the attending physician through close
`observation of the participants.
`
`Effect of GLP-1 in obese subjects. The experimental procedure was similar
`to the design depicted in Fig. 1 with the exception that only one dose of
`GLP-1 (1.5 pmol/kg䡠min) was infused. Treatments were given in ran-
`dom order, with infusions being separated by at least 7 d. All solutions
`were administered with a concomitant iv saline load (Fig. 1).
`On the day of each study, patients had fasted from 2400 h onward
`before coming to the research unit 8 h later. The fasting state was
`assessed in the morning by an ultrasound examination of the gallblad-
`der. At 0800 h, the patients emptied their bladders, which was confirmed
`by ultrasound. Afterwards, to avoid additional, nonstandardized acti-
`vation of the renin-angiotensin system, subjects were maintained supine
`for the duration of the experiment. Teflon catheters were placed into
`each forearm, one for infusions and one for blood sampling. After the
`baseline blood sample was taken, an iv infusion of hypertonic saline
`(2.5% NaCl) was started at a rate of 0.03 ml/kg䡠min for 2 h. The total salt
`load was 9.9 ⫾ 0.3 g, which represents the daily salt load in a liberal
`Western diet. Simultaneously, a second infusion of 0.9% saline contain-
`ing 0.5% albumin (placebo) or 0.9% saline plus synthetic GLP-1 (for an
`infusion rate of 1.5 pmol/kg䡠min) was started and continued for 3 h
`(infusion rate 50 ml/h). The additional salt load through the peptide/
`placebo infusion was equal for both treatments and was approximately
`1.35 g NaCl.
`During the whole experiment, free fluid consumption was allowed.
`Food intake was not permitted. At the end of each 180-min investigation
`period, water intake and the quantity of voided urine (ml) were mea-
`sured, and bladder emptying was again confirmed by ultrasound. Ad-
`verse effects were assessed by the attending physician through close
`observation of the participants and by questioning.
`
`mercially available kit (Schering Schweiz AG, Baar, Switzerland) with
`a detection limit of 2.0 ␮IU/ml. Plasma renin activity (PRA) was mea-
`sured by RIA (DSL-25100; Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Web-
`ster, TX). Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 3.0 and
`4.3%, respectively, with a detection limit of 1.8 pg/ml. Plasma concen-
`trations of aldosterone were determined using a commercially available,
`solid-phase RIA (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA).
`Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation at 140 pg/ml were 6.9 and
`5.5%, respectively, with a detection limit of 16 pg/ml.
`
`Laboratory analyses
`
`At the beginning of the study and at 30-min intervals, blood samples
`were drawn for glucose, sodium, osmolality, renin activity, angiotensin
`II, and aldosterone determinations (Fig. 1). Sodium excretion, osmola-
`lity, pH, and creatinine were measured in the urine collected at the end
`of 180 min.
`Glucose concentrations were measured with the hexokinase method.
`Sodium concentrations in plasma and in urine were measured on an
`automated analyzer (DADEBEHRING Corp.), following the manufac-
`turer’s instructions, using an ion-selective electrode method. Osmolality
`in plasma and urine were determined on an osmometer (OM802; Vogel
`Corp.) using the freezing point method.
`PRA was measured by RIA (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories). Inter-
`and intraassay coefficients of variation were 3.0 and 4.3%, respectively,
`with a detection limit of 1.8 pg/ml. Angiotensin II was measured by RIA
`(double-antibody RIA; Bu¨ hlmann Laboratories AG, Allschwil, Switzer-
`land) with a detection limit of 0.7 pg/ml and a coefficient of variation
`of 6%. Plasma concentrations of aldosterone were determined using a
`commercially available, solid-phase RIA (Diagnostic Products Corpo-
`ration). Inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation at 140 pg/ml were
`6.9 and 5.5%, respectively, with a detection limit of 16 pg/ml.
`
`Materials
`
`Calculations
`
`Synthetic human GLP-1 was obtained from Bachem (Bubendorf,
`Switzerland). The peptide content was used in the calculation of the
`doses infused. The infusions were prepared by the University of Basel
`Hospital Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) according to good manufac-
`turing practice criteria. The solutions were tested for sterility and
`pyrogenicity.
`
`Glucose, electrolyte, pH, osmolality, and renin analyses and
`measurement of glomerular filtration, solute clearance, and
`solute-free water reabsorption
`
`At the start of the study and subsequently in 30-min intervals, blood
`samples were drawn for glucose, sodium, osmolality, creatinine, vaso-
`pressin, renin activity, angiotensin II, and aldosterone determinations
`(Fig. 1). Sodium, chloride, H⫹, and calcium excretion, osmolality, and
`creatinine were measured in the urine collected during 180 min. Glo-
`merular filtration was assessed by creatinine clearance and solute clear-
`ance by the osmolal clearance.
`Creatinine clearance was calculated using the following formula:
`⫽ Ucr
`⫻ V/Pcr, where Ccr is creatinine clearance, Ucr is urine cre-
`Ccr
`atinine concentration, V is the urine volume collected during 180 min,
`and Pcr is plasma creatinine concentration.
`Using the same formula, osmolal clearance was calculated using urine
`and plasma osmolality.
`Free water reabsorption (TcH2O) was determined using the follow-
`ing formula, which considers plasma and urine osmolality: TcH2O ⫽
`V(Uosm/Posm ⫺ 1), where V is urine volume expressed in liters, Uosm
`is urine osmolality, and Posm is plasma osmolality.
`Glucose concentrations were measured with the hexokinase method.
`Electrolyte concentrations in heparin plasma and in urine were mea-
`sured on an automated analyser (Dimension RXL; DADE-BEHRING
`Corp, Wilmington, DE), following the manufacturer’s instructions, us-
`ing an ion-selective electrode method. pH was measured immediately
`from urine samples using an autoanalyzer (ABL 700; Radiometer,
`Copenhagen, Denmark). Plasma and urine osmolality were determined
`with an osmometer (OM802; Vogel Corp., Bern, Switzerland) using the
`freezing point method. Insulin was determined by RIA using a com-
`
`Solute-free or free water clearance (CH2O) was assessed according to
`the following: CH2O ⫽ V ⫻ (1 ⫺ Uosm/Posm), where V is urine volume,
`and Uosm and Posm are osmolality in urine and plasma, respectively.
`The TcH2O by the kidneys is inversely related to the CH2O and, there-
`fore, can be estimated as follows: TcH2O ⫽ ⫺CH2O.
`
`Statistical analysis
`
`Comparisons between the different infusion periods were made by
`ANOVA for repeated measurements or by paired t tests (two-tailed) as
`appropriate. Paired t tests were used when ANOVA was statistically
`significant using a Bonferroni correction. Otherwise, the Wilcoxon
`signed rank sum test was used. For all calculations, STATA software,
`version 6.0 for Windows 95/98 (Stata Corporation, College Station,
`Texas) was used. Unless otherwise noted, data are expressed as means ⫾
`sem. A significance level of 5% was used throughout.
`
`Results
`Effect of GLP-1 on blood glucose, water intake, and thirst in
`healthy subjects
`Figure 2A shows the physiological effect of GLP-1 on
`blood glucose. The graded doses of synthetic human GLP-1
`reduced glucose concentrations and the glucose/time area
`under the curve (AUC) in a dose-dependent manner. Vol-
`unteers reduced water consumption by 15% during the in-
`fusion of the higher GLP-1 dose; however, the difference was
`not statistically significant (P ⫽ 0.178, ANOVA). Water in-
`gestion was slightly reduced from 1405 ⫾ 110 ml (placebo)
`to 1327 ⫾ 95 ml (GLP-1 infusion rate of 0.375 pmol/kg䡠min)
`and, finally, to 1279 ⫾ 78 ml. GLP-1 infusions did not have
`an influence on the visual thirst analog scales (data not
`shown).
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`3058 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061
`
`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`FIG. 2. Data are means (⫾SEM) of plasma glu-
`cose during treatment with GLP-1 and placebo
`(0.9% saline) in (A) healthy subjects and (B)
`obese persons.
`
`Effects of GLP-1 on sodium, urine volume excretion, and
`water reabsorption in healthy subjects
`
`Renal handling of sodium and free water. Sodium excretion
`increased from 74 ⫾ 8 to 86⫾ 9 and 143 ⫾ 18 mmol (P ⫽
`0.0009, ANOVA), and fractional sodium excretion rose from
`1.6 ⫾ 0.2 to 1.7 ⫾ 0.2 and 2.7 ⫾ 0.3% (P ⫽ 0.0004, ANOVA)
`during the placebo, GLP-1 0.375 pmol/kg䡠min, and GLP-1 1.5
`pmol/kg䡠min infusion periods, respectively. According to
`this pattern, osmolal clearance increased from 4.45 ⫾ 0.42 to
`4.96 ⫾ 0.29 and 7.11 ⫾ 0.67 ml/min (P ⬍ 0.0086, ANOVA).
`Water reabsorption equalled 450 ⫾ 56, 573 ⫾ 34, and 747 ⫾
`70 ml (P ⫽ 0.0158) with the infusions of placebo, GLP-1 0.375
`pmol/kg䡠min, and GLP-1 1.5 pmol/kg䡠min, respectively.
`
`Urine volume increased from 360 ⫾ 38 to 400 ⫾ 28 and 639
`⫾ 68 ml/3 h (P ⫽ 0.0009). Urine volume and sodium excre-
`tion changes by infused GLP-1 were dose dependent. The
`creatinine clearance did not change in healthy subjects under
`the experimental conditions (data not shown). Table 2 sum-
`marizes the results on urinary volume and electrolyte
`outputs.
`
`Effects of GLP-1 on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis
`In healthy volunteers, increasing doses of GLP-1 did not
`affect the time course, the PRA, angiotensin II, or the aldo-
`sterone plasma concentrations. The AUCs are depicted in
`Table 3.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061 3059
`
`TABLE 2. Effect of GLP-1 on urine fluid and electrolyte output in healthy subjects
`
`Parameter
`
`Placebo
`
`0.375 pmol/kg 䡠 min
`400 ⫾ 28
`360 ⫾ 38
`Urine volume (ml/180 min)
`746 ⫾ 25
`701 ⫾ 59
`Urine osmolality (mosmol/liter)
`86 ⫾ 9
`74 ⫾ 8
`Sodium excretion (mmol/180 min)
`1.7 ⫾ 0.2
`1.6 ⫾ 0.2
`Fractional excretion of sodium (%)
`Data are mean values ⫾ SEM. P values calculated using ANOVA for repeated measurements.
`
`GLP-1
`
`1.5 pmol/kg 䡠 min
`639 ⫾ 68
`673 ⫾ 28
`143 ⫾ 18
`2.7 ⫾ 0.3
`
`P (ANOVA)
`
`0.0009
`0.2595
`0.0013
`0.0004
`
`TABLE 3. Effect of different doses of GLP-1 on hormone responses of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy volunteers
`
`Parameter
`
`Placebo
`
`GLP-1
`
`P (ANOVA)
`
`1.5 pmol/kg 䡠 min
`0.375 pmol/kg 䡠 min
`17,562 ⫾ 1,114
`17,700 ⫾ 1,302
`17,490 ⫾ 1,185
`0.928
`AUC aldosterone
`1,152 ⫾ 81
`1,319 ⫾ 155
`1,256 ⫾ 150
`0.316
`AUC renin
`729 ⫾ 71
`889 ⫾ 122
`860 ⫾ 92
`0.196
`AUC angiotensin II
`Data are mean values ⫾ SEM of AUCs of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. P values were calculated using ANOVA for repeated
`measurements. Units are expressed as pg*180 min.
`
`TABLE 4. Insulin resistance in 16 obese subjects
`
`Insulin resistance data
`Diabetes mellitus (%)
`IR-HOMA (mU䡠mmol/liter2)
`Index of insulin secretion (%)
`Plasma glucose (mmol/liter)
`Plasma insulin (mU/ml)
`Data are mean values ⫾ SEM at study entry.
`
`Obese subjects
`25
`8.2 ⫾ 0.9
`544 ⫾ 167
`5.5 ⫾ 0.3
`33.8 ⫾ 3.0
`
`Glucose tolerance and IR in the obese population
`The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus was made in 25%
`of the patients (n ⫽ 4) based on abnormalities in glucose
`tolerance (Table 4).b Of these patients, two were on diet
`therapy alone, one was using a combination of sulfonylureas
`and metformin, and one was on a combination of thiazo-
`lidindiones and metformin; none was on insulin therapy.
`There was a family history of diabetes in one subject, and 31%
`of patients had first-degree relatives with diabetes.
`IR data are presented in Table 4. IR as defined by HOMA
`was present in all nondiabetic patients (Table 4).
`
`Effect of GLP-1 on blood glucose and plasma insulin
`Figure 2B depicts the well-known effect of GLP-1 on blood
`glucose, an effect that is similar in both the obese and healthy
`volunteers. Synthetic human GLP-1 reduced glucose con-
`centrations and the glucose AUC (P ⫽ 0.0001). Insulin release
`was slightly stimulated during GLP-1 administration, as
`shown by an increase in the insulin/time AUC (data not
`shown; P ⫽ 0.006), thereby confirming the peptide’s well-
`known insulin-releasing property.
`
`Renal effects of GLP-1
`
`Glomerular filtration and urine volume. The effect of GLP-1 on
`creatinine clearance is shown in Fig. 3. GLP-1 decreased
`creatinine clearance from (mean ⫾ sd) 151 ⫾ 8 to 142⫾ 8
`ml/min (P ⫽ 0.022). In contrast to the decline in creatinine
`clearance, patients showed a higher urine output with GLP-1;
`urine volume increased from 343 ⫾ 35 to 454 ⫾ 62 ml (P ⫽
`0.028, paired t test) during the collection period of 180 min.
`
`FIG. 3. Data are presented with box-whisker plots. With GLP-1 in-
`fusion, the GFR decreased from 151 ml/min (placebo) to 142 ml/min
`(GLP-1; *, P ⫽ 0.022, paired t test) in obese persons.
`
`This improvement was achieved with enhanced solute ex-
`cretion as shown by an increase in the osmolal clearance, an
`increase in sodium, chloride, and calcium excretion, and an
`increase in tubular water reabsorption.
`Renal handling of solutes and water. Osmolal clearance rose
`from 3.8 ⫾ 0.3 to 4.8 ⫾ 0.5 ml/min (P ⫽ 0.023). Figure 4 shows
`the effects of the GLP-1 infusion on sodium and chloride
`excretion. Sodium excretion increased by 60% (P ⫽ 0.015),
`and fractional sodium excretion rose from 1.4 ⫾ 0.1 to 2.3 ⫾
`0.3% (P ⫽ 0.003). Similarly, chloride excretion improved by
`44% (P ⫽ 0.011). Calcium excretion increased by 60% (P ⫽
`0.011; Fig. 4C), whereas hydrogen excretion was dramatically
`reduced by 75% (P ⫽ 0.013; Fig. 4D). Potassium excretion, on
`the other hand, did not change under treatment with GLP-1
`compared with placebo; potassium excretion reached 23.4 ⫾
`1.4 mmol with GLP-1 and 21.6 ⫾ 1.7 mmol with placebo (P ⫽
`0.24).
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`3060 J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061
`
`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`FIG. 4. Effect of GLP-1 or placebo on
`kidney functions in obese subjects. Data
`are means (⫾ SEM) of sodium excretion
`(A) and chloride excretion (B) in milli-
`moles during treatment with GLP-1 (in-
`fusion rate of 1.5 pmol/kg䡠min) and pla-
`cebo (0.9% saline), respectively. The
`ratios GLP-1 and placebo in sodium and
`chloride excretion are approximately
`the same, and changes were statisti-
`cally significant (*, P ⬍ 0.05). Data are
`means (⫾SEM) for calcium excretion (C)
`and H⫹ excretion (D) in millimoles dur-
`ing treatment with GLP-1 and placebo,
`respectively. The differences were sta-
`tistically significant (*, P ⬍ 0.05). These
`changes implicate a mechanism of
`GLP-1 at the proximal tubular cells.
`
`TcH2O did not change; however, there was a trend toward
`an increase from 457 ⫾ 37 (placebo) to 551 ⫾ 41 (GLP-1)
`ml/180 min (P ⫽ 0.12).
`Effects on renin. During GLP-1 infusion, there was a reduction
`in PRA; the PRA/time AUC diminished from 1588 ⫾ 185 to
`1186 ⫾ 84 pg䡠min/ml (P ⫽ 0.044). The drop in PRA correlated
`slightly with the increase in urinary sodium (data not
`shown).
`
`Discussion
`This study demonstrates that the infusion of synthetic
`human GLP-1 significantly increased natriuresis in healthy
`male subjects and in obese, insulin-resistant men. The effects
`of GLP-1 on the kidney broaden the spectrum of the biolog-
`ical actions of the peptide, in addition to its well-known
`effects on blood glucose and insulin release. We have pre-
`viously reported that food and water intake were diminished
`with continuous GLP-1 infusion in patients suffering from
`type 2 diabetes mellitus (16). Here we have documented that
`GLP-1 infusion dose-dependently increases urinary sodium
`excretion in healthy male volunteers. The natriuretic effect of
`GLP-1 was confirmed in obese, insulin-resistant patients,
`
`25% of whom were suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus.
`The GLP-1-induced natriuresis was paralleled by enhanced
`chloride and urinary calcium excretion. After sodium, chlo-
`ride is the most prevalent ion in the filtrate, and the proximal
`reabsorption is linked to active sodium transport; likewise,
`a reduction of the proximal reabsorption process of sodium
`will affect chloride reabsorption in a similar manner. Most of
`the filtered calcium is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule and
`the medullary loop of Henle. This transport is almost passive
`and follows the gradients established by sodium, chloride,
`and water reabsorption. A decreased sodium and chloride
`reabsorption in the proximal tubule will lead to diminished
`calcium reabsorption in the same tubular segment. The in-
`crease in urinary calcium excretion in this setting reinforces
`the proximal inhibitory effect of GLP-1 on tubular sodium
`reabsorption. Furthermore, this study showed a diminished
`hydrogen excretion, suggesting a reduction in the sodium
`hydrogen exchange in the proximal tubule. These data im-
`plicate a direct effect of GLP-1 on the Na⫹/H⫹ exchange at
`the proximal tubular cells. Preliminary evidence suggests the
`possibility that GLP-1 receptors are present in human kid-
`neys (Gutmann, H., and J. Drewe, unpublished data).
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1149 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Gutzwiller et al. (cid:127) GLP-1 Reduces Glomerular Hyperfiltration
`
`J Clin Endocrinol Metab, June 2004, 89(6):3055–3061 3061
`
`Whereas GLP-1 infusion was followed by natriuresis, po-
`tassium excretion remained constant. The excretion of po-
`tassium is mainly determined by its secretion into the lumen
`of the cortical-collecting tubule under the influence of aldo-
`sterone. In this study, aldosterone release was not signifi-
`cantly altered during GLP-1 administration.
`Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus lead to a volume
`expansion caused by a high sodium resorption in the prox-
`imal renal tubules. These effects are linked to the develop-
`ment of hypertension in this group of patients. The mecha-
`nism leading to this phenomenon has not yet been
`elucidated. We propose that diminished GLP-1 release in
`obese individuals (23) and in patients suffering from type 2
`diabetes mellitus could, in part, be responsible for an in-
`creased tubular reabsorption of sodium and, as a conse-
`quence, for volume expansion with the potential risk of de-
`veloping hypertension (24, 25). GLP-1 may, therefore, be the
`peptide that protects the body from sodium excess that can
`occur during meals by enhancing sodium excretion, a con-
`clusion that is supported by our data.
`In conclusion, we have shown that a pharmacological dose
`of GLP-1 increases sodium excretion in the proximal renal
`tubule and decreases glomerular hyperfiltration in obese,
`insulin-resistant men. The reduction of the GFR is possibly
`related, via tubulo-glomerular feedback, to the improvement
`in sodium excretion shown during GLP-1 administration.
`This theory is strengthened by the fact that GLP-1 receptors
`have been proposed to be present in human kidney (Gut-
`mann, H., and J. Drewe, unpublished data). Therefore, we
`infer that this natriuretic effect is mediated directly by GLP-1
`receptors in the renal tissue by the incretin hormone. Our
`functional data suggest a GLP-1 action at the proximal renal
`tubulus cells.
`What are the clinical consequences of our results? GLP-1
`might protect obese patients with IR against volume expan-
`sion, glomerular hyperfiltration, and the development of
`arterial hypertension. Diabetes is associated with hypergly-
`cemia, and hyperglycemia produces hyperfiltration, which
`in the long run is associated with kidney damage. We spec-
`ulate that GLP-1 could reverse this vicious cycle. Several
`GLP-1 analogs are under clinical investigation, and consid-
`ering the data presented in this article, they represent a new
`treatment regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes. The
`renoprotective properties of GLP-1 may be an important
`aspect in the prevention of diabetic nephropathy. In addition
`to its blood glucose-lowering effects through stimulation of
`insulin secretion and its appetite-suppressing effects, GLP-1
`exerts additional beneficial effects outside the entero-insular
`axis. The renal effects of GLP-1 merit further investigation.
`
`Acknowledgments
`
`We express our special thanks to Dr. Rolf Graeni, Kantonales Spital
`Wolhusen, Switzerland, for logistical support, Kathleen Bucher for ed-
`iting the manuscript, and Gerdien Gamboni
`for expert
`technical
`assistance.
`
`Received August 11, 2003. Accepted February 20, 2004.
`Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Christoph
`Beglinger, M.D., Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital CH-
`4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: beglinger@tmr.ch.
`This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science
`Foundation (Nr. 3200-065588.01/1) and by a grant from the European
`Commission (Moebius-IST 1999-1159).
`
`References
`
`1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL 1998 Overweight and
`obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960 –1994. Int J Obes Relat
`Metab Disord 22:39 – 47
`2. Stamler J 1993 Epidemic obesity in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket