throbber
Encouraging adherence to
`long-term medication
`
`SUMMARY
`Non-adherence to medicines is common in patients with chronic disease and in those prescribed
`preventive medication. It can be intentional, unintentional, or both.
`
`Non-adherence reduces the effectiveness of prescribed medicines and may lead the prescriber to
`escalate treatment unnecessarily and potentially dangerously.
`
`Patient education, shared decision making, pharmacist support and motivational interviewing
`reduce intentional non-adherence.
`
`Interventions to reduce unintentional non-adherence address patient factors including
`misunderstanding, confusion or forgetfulness, and factors beyond the patient’s control such as cost.
`
`Patients should be asked about adherence at every consultation. A collaborative communication
`style is effective, using the patient’s own expressions and responding to their cues. Normalising
`non-adherence, and starting with open questions then following up with more specific probes,
`can also help.
`
`Electronic reminders, such as text messaging, have been shown to increase medication adherence.
`
`Tim Usherwood
`Professor of General
`Practice
`University of Sydney
`Honorary Professorial
`Fellow
`The George Institute for
`Global Health
`Sydney
`
`Keywords
`dose administration aids,
`medication reviews, patient
`adherence, polypharmacy
`
`Aust Prescr 2017;40:147–50
`https://doi.org/10.18773/
`austprescr.2017.050
`
`Introduction
`In developed countries approximately 50% of
`patients living with chronic disease do not adhere to
`treatment recommendations.1 A similar proportion
`do not take preventive medicines as prescribed.2
`Some patients do not start their prescribed drugs. Of
`those who do, many subsequently discontinue. Non-
`adherence is a major reason why treatments shown
`to be efficacious in trials are often less effective in
`clinical practice.
`Non-adherence can be classified as intentional or
`unintentional.3 Both reasons may contribute to non-
`adherence in an individual.
`
`Intentional non‑adherence
`Intentional non-adherence is when a patient actively
`decides not to take a drug or follow treatment
`recommendations. It is likely to reflect the patient’s
`attitudes to medicines in general, and their
`specific beliefs and concerns about the treatment
`recommended and the disease being treated.4 A
`study of 99 adults and young people living with
`asthma identified several themes that predicted
`adherence to preventer medication. These included
`the perceived necessity of treatment, safety concerns,
`acceptance of disease chronicity, beliefs about
`treatment effectiveness, ease of use and satisfaction
`with asthma management.5 The opinions of friends
`and family, concerns about adverse effects, and
`
`experience of adverse effects were particularly
`salient. Studies of intentional non-adherence to
`other types of medication for a wide range of
`diseases have shown similar results.6 These findings
`illustrate the importance of patients’ own experiences
`and the views of significant others in informing the
`decision to take medicines.
`
`Unintentional non‑adherence
`Unintentional non-adherence is unplanned by
`the patient. Causes include misunderstanding or
`forgetfulness, and factors beyond the patient’s
`control such as an inability to access prescribed
`treatment. Multiple studies have shown that
`treatment complexity, cognitive impairment,
`cost and other practical difficulties (e.g. opening
`medicine bottles or difficulty swallowing pills) may
`reduce adherence.1
`
`Detecting non‑adherence
`Non-adherence reduces the patient’s potential
`to benefit from treatment. It may also lead to
`unnecessary and potentially dangerous escalation
`of medicines.
`Clinicians are poor at detecting non-adherence. In a
`study of 1169 patients being treated for hypertension,
`their doctors recognised non-adherence in fewer
`than half of those whose pharmacy records indicated
`significant gaps in dispensing. Prescribers often
`
`Full text free online at nps.org.au/australianprescriber
`
`147
`
`VOLUME 40 : NUMBER 4 : AUGUST 2017
`
`ARTICLE
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2390
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Encouraging adherence to long-term medication
`
`Patients should
`be asked about
`adherence at
`every consultation
`
`intensified treatment even when they suspected
`significant non-adherence.7 Patients should be asked
`about adherence at every consultation, and a poor
`response to treatment should always prompt detailed
`enquiry. A number of standardised questionnaires have
`been developed to measure adherence but they are not
`readily incorporated into routine clinical use and their
`psychometric properties are limited in that setting.8
`A small number of studies have
`examined different styles of
`questioning by prescribers for
`detecting non-adherence.9-11 Effective
`strategies include a collaborative
`style, using the patient’s own
`expressions in responding to their
`utterances and cues, normalising
`non-adherence, and starting with
`open questions then following up
`with more specific probes (see Box).
`In one study, questions that asked directly about
`missed doses were almost four times more likely to
`elicit disclosure of non-adherence than other question
`types.11 Disclosure can be followed up with a more
`detailed enquiry and discussion of ways to promote
`adherence and overcome barriers.
`
`Addressing intentional
`non‑adherence
`A systematic review explored patient-centred
`interventions to improve adherence, including patient
`education, shared decision making and pharmacist
`support.12 Many educational interventions resulted
`in better adherence and greater patient knowledge.
`However, their impact on adherence typically
`decreased over time. Shared decision making
`(including the use of decision aids) increased patient
`
`Box Asking about adherence to medicines during
`a consultation
`
`Doctor: How are you going with taking your pills?
`
`[Open question using the patient’s usual name for their tablets]
`Patient: Yes, good
`
`Doctor: Remembering to take them regularly?
`
`[Gentle probe question]
`Patient: Yes, usually
`
`Doctor: Many people forget to take their pills occasionally
`
`[Normalising statement responding to patient’s answer to the probe question]
`Patient: Hmm
`
`Doctor: Just thinking about the last couple of weeks – have you missed taking your pills on
`any occasion?
`[Specific probe asking directly about missed doses]
`
`
`
`148
`
`Full text free online at nps.org.au/australianprescriber
`
`knowledge, but adherence improved in only two
`out of four studies.12 Adherence also improved with
`interventions by pharmacy staff, when they were
`tailored to patient needs, often involving both face-to-
`face and telephone encounters.
`Motivational interviewing is a patient-centred
`counselling technique that aims to encourage
`behaviour change by reinforcing positive intentions
`and challenging negative ideas. It has been shown to
`improve adherence in a variety of settings.13,14 However,
`not all studies show benefit and the time pressures of
`routine clinical practice can limit applicability.15
`
`Reducing unintentional
`non‑adherence
`Interventions that address unintentional non-
`adherence seek to reduce barriers and improve the
`patient’s ability to take medicines as prescribed.
`A wide range of strategies has been studied.
`
`Cost
`Out-of-pocket cost is a well-recognised barrier
`to accessing medicines.16 In a recent survey, the
`Australian Bureau of Statistics reported that
`7.6% of patients who had received a prescription
`delayed getting the medicine, or did not get it at
`all, due to cost. The proportion was even higher
`in areas of disadvantage.17 Prescribers may be
`able to reduce the impact of cost by, for example,
`prescribing generic or lower cost medicines when
`appropriate. Pharmacists may also assist patients by
`recommending lower cost brands.
`
`Drug regimen
`Patients can be confused by the number and variety
`of medicines they need to take. Adherence has long
`been known to be inversely associated with the
`complexity of the regimen.18 Prescribers should aim
`to simplify this as much as possible. Discussion with
`a pharmacist may assist, particularly with tailoring
`appropriate preparations, formulations and packaging
`for the individual (e.g. people with an inability to
`swallow).19 These consultations may be rebatable in
`Australia using the Medicare medication management
`review items. It may be possible to reduce the
`frequency of administration, introduce combination
`medicines, or even deprescribe in some instances.20
`It is good practice to provide patients with a printed
`list of their medicines and the times of day when they
`should be administered. Alternatively, the patient
`may be encouraged to use a smartphone app such
`as the NPS MedicineWise MedicineList+. The patient’s
`understanding of their regimen should be checked.
`For patients with cognitive impairment, the support
`of a carer to encourage or assist with administration
`is essential.
`
`ARTICLE
`
`VOLUME 40 : NUMBER 4 : AUGUST 2017
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2390
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`Brand swapping when medicines are dispensed may
`cause confusion and impair adherence. Pharmacists
`have a responsibility to educate patients if they swap
`brands, and prescribers should explain to patients and
`carers when they may be offered a choice.
`Fixed-dose combinations can be helpful for patients
`on multiple medicines, and have been shown to
`improve adherence in some circumstances.21 Starting
`treatment with combination medicines has a strong
`evidence base in the management of HIV and other
`infections. For conditions such as hypertension, the
`evidence for starting with more than one medicine is
`mixed, but the strategy should be considered.22
`
`Patient reminders
`Reminder packaging, which incorporates a date or
`time for a medicine to be taken, is an effective way
`of promoting adherence and has been shown to
`improve biological outcomes in type 2 diabetes and
`hypertension.23 Drug administration aids are a form of
`reminder packaging and may be particularly helpful for
`patients prescribed multiple medicines. However, they
`are not suitable in all circumstances.24 The stability of
`some drugs may be compromised by repackaging.25
`Patients with impaired cognition, eyesight or dexterity
`often have difficulty using them. Repackaging by the
`pharmacist may increase the cost to the patient and
`filling a compartmentalised box at home can lead to
`errors. Also, such boxes are rarely childproof.26
`There is strong evidence that regular reminders are
`an effective strategy for increasing adherence.27
`Electronic devices can assist with this. In a
`randomised controlled trial, 143 adults with asthma
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Sabaté E, editor. Adherence to long-term therapies:
`evidence for action. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
`Organization; 2003.
`2. Naderi SH, Bestwick JP, Wald DS. Adherence to drugs that
`prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162
`patients. Am J Med 2012;125:882-7.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/
`j.amjmed.2011.12.013
`3. Hugtenburg JG, Timmers L, Elders PJM, Vervloet M,
`van Dijk L. Definitions, variants, and causes of nonadherence
`with medication: a challenge for tailored interventions.
`Patient Prefer Adherence 2013;7:675–82. https://doi.org/
`10.2147/PPA.S29549
`4. Horne R, Weinman J, Hankins M. The beliefs about
`medicines questionnaire: the development and evaluation of
`a new method for assessing the cognitive representation of
`medication. Psychol Health 1999;14:1-24. https://doi.org/
`10.1080/08870449908407311
`5. Foster JM, Smith L, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Usherwood T,
`Sawyer SM, Rand CS, et al. Identifying patient-specific
`beliefs and behaviours for conversations about adherence
`in asthma. Intern Med J 2012;42:e136-44. https://doi.org/
`10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02541.x
`6. Laba TL, Essue B, Kimman M, Jan S. Understanding patient
`preferences in medication nonadherence: a review of stated
`preference data. Patient 2015;8:385-95. https://doi.org/
`10.1007/s40271-014-0099-3
`
`used combination fluticasone propionate/salmeterol
`inhalers with attached electronic monitoring devices.
`The device recorded inhaler activation and provided
`twice-daily reminders for missed doses to those in the
`intervention group. Over six months, adherence was
`over 50% higher in the intervention group than in the
`control group.28
`A meta-analysis evaluating the use of text messaging
`in adults with chronic disease found it doubled the
`odds of adherence across 16 randomised controlled
`trials. The effect was not dependent on message
`characteristics such as personalisation, two-way
`communication or daily frequency.29
`As new information and communication technologies
`develop, new strategies for promoting and monitoring
`adherence are emerging. An example is ‘smart pills’
`which send a signal to an external monitor when a
`tablet has been ingested. The signal can be linked to
`automated adherence reminders and to a medication
`reconciliation system.30
`
`Conclusion
`
`Medicines do not work if they are not administered.
`Non-adherence, whether by intent or due to cost,
`complexity, or forgetfulness, is a major cause of
`reduced effectiveness and hence of preventable
`morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based strategies
`are available to address both intentional and
`unintentional non-adherence.
`
`Tim Usherwood is a member of the Editorial Executive
`Committee of Australian Prescriber.
`
`7. Meddings J, Kerr EA, Heisler M, Hofer TP. Physician
`assessments of medication adherence and decisions to
`intensify medications for patients with uncontrolled blood
`pressure: still no better than a coin toss. BMC Health Serv Res
`2012;12:270. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-270
`8. Lam WY, Fresco P. Medication adherence measures: an
`overview. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:217047. https://doi.org/
`10.1155/2015/217047
`9. Steele DJ, Jackson TC, Gutmann MC. Have you been taking
`your pills? The adherence-monitoring sequence in the
`medical interview. J Fam Pract 1990;30:294-9.
`10. Bokhour BG, Berlowitz DR, Long JA, Kressin NR. How do
`providers assess antihypertensive medication adherence
`in medical encounters? J Gen Intern Med 2006;21:577-83.
`https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00397.x
`11. Callon W, Saha S, Korthuis PT, Wilson IB, Moore RD, Cohn J,
`et al. Which clinician questions elicit accurate disclosure
`of antiretroviral non-adherence when talking to patients?
`AIDS Behavior 2016;20:1108-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/
`s10461-015-1231-7
`12. Kuntz JL, Safford MM, Singh JA, Phansalkar S, Slight SP,
`Her QL, et al. Patient-centered interventions to improve
`medication management and adherence: a qualitative review
`of research findings. Patient Educ Couns 2014;97:310-26.
`https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.021
`
`Full text free online at nps.org.au/australianprescriber
`
`149
`
`ARTICLE
`
`VOLUME 40 : NUMBER 4 : AUGUST 2017
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2390
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`Encouraging adherence to long-term medication
`
`13. VanBuskirk KA, Wetherell JL. Motivational interviewing used
`in primary care. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
`J Behav Med 2014;37:768–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/
`s10865-013-9527-4
`14. Hill S, Kavookjian J. Motivational interviewing as a
`behavioral intervention to increase HAART adherence in
`patients who are HIV-positive: a systematic review of the
`literature. AIDS Care 2012;24:583-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/
`09540121.2011.630354
`15. Foster JM, Smith L, Usherwood T, Sawyer SM, Reddel HK.
`General practitioner-delivered adherence counseling in
`asthma: feasibility and usefulness of skills, training and
`support tools. J Asthma 2016;53:311-20. https://doi.org/
`10.3109/02770903.2015.1091473
`16. Sinnott SJ, Buckley C, O’Riordan D, Bradley C, Whelton H.
`The effect of copayments for prescriptions on adherence
`to prescription medicines in publicly insured populations;
`a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One
`2013;8:e64914. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064914
`17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 4839.0 - Patient experiences
`in Australia: summary of findings, 2015-16. 15 November 2016.
`www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4839.0 [cited 2017
`Jul 1]
`18. Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, Denekens J.
`Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research.
`A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther 2001;26:331-42.
`https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00363.x
`19. Cooper JA, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, Kerse N,
`Bradley MC, Ryan C, et al. Interventions to improve the
`appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a
`Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open 2015;5:e009235.
`https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009235
`20. Le Couteur D, Gnjidic D, McLachlan A. Deprescribing.
`Aust Prescr 2011;34:182-5. https://doi.org/10.18773/
`austprescr.2011.095
`21. Webster R, Patel A, Selak V, Billot L, Bots M, Brown A,
`et al. Effectiveness of fixed dose combination medication
`(‘polypills’) compared with usual care in patients with
`cardiovascular disease or at high risk: a prospective,
`individual patient data meta-analysis of 3140 patients in six
`countries. Intern J Cardiol 2016;205:147-56. https://doi.org/
`10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.12.015
`
`22. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Guideline for the
`diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults - 2016.
`Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2016.
`www.heartfoundation.org.au/images/uploads/publications/
`PRO-167_Hypertension-guideline-2016_WEB.pdf [cited 2017
`Jul 1]
`23. Mahtani KR, Heneghan CJ, Glasziou PP, Perera R. Reminder
`packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-
`term medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011:CD005025.
`https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005025.pub3
`24. Elliott RA. Appropriate use of dose administration aids.
`Aust Presc 2014;37:46-50. https://doi.org/10.18773/
`austprescr.2014.020
`25. Haaywood A, Llewelyn V, Robertson S, Mylrea M, Glass B.
`Dose administration aids: pharmacists’ role in improving
`patient care. Australas Med J 2011;4:183–9. https://doi.org/
`10.4066/AMJ.2011.693
`26. Barker R. When is child-resistant packaging not child
`resistant? Aust Prescr 2013;36:194. https://doi.org/10.18773/
`austprescr.2013.084
`27. Schedlbauer A, Davies P, Fahey T. Interventions to improve
`adherence to lipid lowering medication. Cochrane Database
`Syst Rev 2010:CD004371. https://doi.org/10.1002/
`14651858.CD004371.pub3
`28. Foster JM, Usherwood T, Smith L, Sawyer SM, Xuan W,
`Rand CS, et al. Inhaler reminders improve adherence with
`controller treatment in primary care patients with asthma.
`J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;134:1260-8.e3. https://doi.org/
`10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.041
`29. Thakkar J, Kurup R, Laba TL, Santo K, Thiagalingam A,
`Rodgers A, et al. Mobile telephone text messaging for
`medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis.
`JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:340-349. https://doi.org/10.1001/
`jamainternmed.2015.7667
`30. Granger BB, Bosworth H. Medication adherence: emerging
`use of technology. Curr Opin Cardiol 2011;26:279–87.
`https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0b013e328347c150
`
`150
`
`Full text free online at nps.org.au/australianprescriber
`
`ARTICLE
`
`VOLUME 40 : NUMBER 4 : AUGUST 2017
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2390
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket