throbber
Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`DOI 10.1007/s13300-014-0089-4
`
`REVIEW
`
`Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors:
`A Review of Their Basic and Clinical Pharmacology
`
`Sanjay Kalra
`
`To view enhanced content go to www.diabetestherapy-open.com
`Received: August 21, 2014 / Published online: November 26, 2014
`Ó The Author(s) 2014. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`(SGLT2)
`co-transporter-2
`Sodium-glucose
`inhibitors are a newly developed class of oral
`anti-diabetic drugs
`(OADs) with a unique
`mechanism of action. This review describes
`the biochemistry and physiology underlying
`the use of SGLT2 inhibitors, and their clinical
`pharmacology, including mechanism of action
`and posology. The pragmatic placement of
`these molecules in the existing OAD arena is
`also discussed.
`
`Keywords: Anti-diabetic drugs; Cardiovascular
`safety;
`Canagliflozin;
`Dapagliflozin;
`Empagliflozin;
`Perineal hygiene;
`Sodium-
`glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`
`Electronic supplementary material The online
`version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-014-0089-4)
`contains supplementary material, which is available to
`authorized users.
`
`S. Kalra (&)
`Bharti Hospital and B.R.I.D.E., Karnal, India
`e-mail: brideknl@gmail.com
`
`Healthy individuals are able to maintain tight
`glucose homeostasis by closely regulating
`glucose
`production,
`reabsorption,
`and
`utilization.
`The
`importance
`of
`this
`homeostatic mechanism is evident from the
`fact that,
`in spite of extreme variations in
`glucose intake, relatively few people develop
`either diabetes or hypoglycemia [1].
`In people without diabetes, about 180 g of
`glucose is filtered daily by the renal glomeruli,
`and is
`then reabsorbed in the proximal
`convoluted tubule (PCT). This is achieved by
`passive transporters, namely, facilitated glucose
`transporters
`(GLUTs),
`and
`active
`co-
`transporters,
`namely,
`sodium-glucose
`co-
`transporters (SGLTs). There are six identified
`SGLTs, of which two (SGLT1 and SGLT2) are
`considered most important [1]. These SGLTs are
`described in Table 1 [2].
`This review describes the biochemistry and
`physiology underlying the use of
`SGLT2
`inhibitors
`(SGLT2i),
`and
`their
`clinical
`pharmacology, including mechanism of action
`and posology, and discusses the pragmatic
`placement of these molecules in the existing
`oral anti-diabetic drug arena. The article is based
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`356
`
`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`Table 1 Comparison of SGLT1 and SGLT2
`
`Characteristic
`
`Location
`
`Capacity
`
`Affinity
`
`Contribution to glucose reabsorption
`
`SGLT1
`
`SGLT2
`
`Small intestine; later part of PCT
`(segment 3)
`
`Early PCT (segment 1, 2)
`
`Low
`
`High
`
`10%
`
`High
`
`Low
`
`90%
`
`Disease state if mutation/deficiency occurs
`
`Glucose-galactose malabsorption
`
`Familial renal glucosuria
`
`Physical manifestations of disease state
`
`Diarrhea at few days age
`
`Course
`
`Fatal without glucose free/galactose
`free diet
`
`None
`
`Benign
`
`Currently available SGLT2i
`Phlorizin
`Inhibitors
`PCT proximal convoluted tubule, SGLT sodium-glucose co-transporter, SGLT2i sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`
`on previously conducted studies, and does not
`involve any new studies of human or animal
`subjects performed by the author.
`
`Table 2 Sodium glucose
`co-transporters
`development or already approved
`
`in advanced
`
`Molecule
`
`Approval/development status
`
`HISTORY
`
`The first SGLT2i discovered was phlorizin, a
`naturally occurring compound derived from
`apple tree bark. Because of its non-selective
`nature,
`it
`caused
`severe
`gastrointestinal
`symptoms. Due to this and to its poor oral
`bioavailability, work on its development could
`not continue [3]. Drugs which specifically
`inhibit
`SGLT2,
`and
`thereby
`avoid
`gastrointestinal
`effects
`related
`to
`SGLT1
`inhibition, have now been developed, some of
`which are listed in Table 2.
`
`RATIONALE
`
`the excretion of glucose
`Glucosuria (i.e.,
`through the kidneys) only occurs
`if
`the
`maximal
`capacity
`of
`various
`glucose
`transporter proteins (350 mg glucose/min) is
`exceeded [2, 4]. Earlier, glucosuria was thought
`
`Canagliflozin
`
`Dapagliflozin
`
`40 countries including EU, USA,
`China, Russia
`
`40 countries including EU, USA,
`Japan,
`
`Empagliflozin
`
`Phase 3 [37]
`
`Ipragliflozin
`
`Japan
`
`Luseogliflozin
`
`Under review for approval in Japan
`
`Tofogliflozin
`
`Phase 3 [43, 44]
`
`to be a pathological mechanism, or a marker of
`illness. However, one may approach this
`condition from a different view point. Persons
`with ambient hyperglycemia are at risk of
`endothelial
`dysfunction
`and
`resultant
`complications, due to the high levels of
`glucose in circulation. Kidneys try to prevent
`an excessive rise in blood glucose levels by
`glucuresis,
`thereby mitigating the adverse
`effects associated with high glucose levels.
`Theoretically,
`compounds which promote
`glucuresis should help to reduce circulating
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00002
`
`

`

`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`357
`
`glycemia, manage diabetes, and prevent long-
`term complications.
`
`MECHANISM OF ACTION
`
`inhibitors
`co-transporter-2
`Sodium-glucose
`work by inhibiting SGLT2 in the PCT,
`to
`prevent reabsorption of glucose and facilitate
`its excretion in urine. As glucose is excreted, its
`plasma levels fall leading to an improvement in
`all glycemic parameters [4–6].
`This mechanism of action is dependent on
`blood glucose levels and, unlike the actions of
`thiazolidinediones (mediated through GLUTs),
`is independent of the actions of insulin. Thus,
`there is minimal potential for hypoglycemia,
`and no risk of overstimulation or fatigue of the
`beta cells [7]. Because their mode of action relies
`upon
`normal
`renal
`glomerular-tubular
`function, SGLT2i efficacy is reduced in persons
`with renal impairment.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Dapagliflozin is rapidly absorbed after oral
`administration,
`reaching
`peak
`plasma
`concentration in 2 h, and exhibiting oral
`bioavailability of 78% [8]. Dapagliflozin is
`metabolized
`by
`uridine
`diphosphate-
`glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A9 in both the
`liver and kidneys [8]. Canagliflozin achieves
`maximal plasma concentration 1–2 h after oral
`administration (oral bioavailability 65%) and
`steady state after 4–5 days. It is metabolized by
`glucuronidation by UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 [9].
`Empagliflozin
`reaches
`peak
`plasma
`concentration
`1.33–3.0 h
`after
`oral
`administration, before declining in a biphasic
`manner. The
`terminal half-life has been
`calculated to be 10.3–18.8 h in multiple dose
`studies, with steady state being achieved by day
`
`6 [10]. No dosage adjustments are required in
`renal or hepatic impairment. A summary of the
`clinical pharmacology of SGLT2i is presented in
`Table 3.
`Dapagliflozin and canagliflozin have proven
`efficacy in improving glycemic parameters,
`both as monotherapy and in combination
`[11].
`A
`52-week
`comparison
`between
`canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg showed non-
`inferiority, and canagliflozin 300 mg showed
`statistical superiority to sitagliptin in lowering
`glycated
`hemoglobin
`(HbA1c)
`[12].
`Canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg reduced
`bodyweight versus placebo at week 26 and
`sitagliptin at week 52. The published results
`are summarized in Table 4. Four-year (208-
`week) use of dapagliflozin with metformin
`produced a sustained and durable reduction in
`blood glucose levels with significantly less
`frequent adverse reactions as compared to
`glimepiride with metformin. After 4 years, the
`difference in HbA1c reduction between two
`groups was -0.3% [95% confidence interval
`(CI) -0.51, -0.09]. The trend over a period of
`time showed further increase in the difference
`with more prolonged use [13].
`and safety of
`The
`long-term efficacy
`empagliflozin have also been investigated as
`add-on therapy to basal insulin. Patients with
`type
`2
`diabetes mellitus
`(T2DM) were
`randomized to receive empagliflozin 10 or
`25 mg once daily or placebo; the basal insulin
`regimen was kept
`constant
`for
`the first
`18 weeks, after which the treating investigator
`could adjust the regimen at their discretion for
`the
`following 60 weeks
`[14]. As well
`as
`significant improvements in HbA1c, patients
`in both of
`the empagliflozin groups had
`significant reductions in their insulin doses at
`week 78, and also registered weight loss versus a
`small weight gain in those receiving placebo
`[14]. The decrease in insulin requirements in
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00003
`
`

`

`358
`
`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`Table 3 Clinical pharmacology of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`
`Molecule
`
`Dose range Oral
`bioavailability
`(%)
`
`Elimination pathway
`
`Dose modifications
`
`Dapagliflozin 5–10 mg
`once daily
`
`78
`
`Hepatic and renal
`UGT1A9
`
`Canagliflozin
`
`100–300 mg
`once daily
`
`65
`
`UGT1A9 and 2B4
`
`Empagliflozin 10–25 mg
`once daily
`
`N/a
`
`UGT1A3, UGT1A8,
`UGT1A9, and
`UGT2B7
`
`Should not be initiated in patients with
`eGFR\60 ml/mt/1.73 m2
`No dose adjustment in patients with
`eGFR[60 ml/min/1.73 m2
`Dose limited to 100 mg once daily in patients
`with eGFR[45\60 ml/min/1.73 m2
`Stopped in patients with eGFR\45 ml/min/
`1.73 m2
`
`Dose adjustment in patients with creatinine
`clearance\60 ml/min
`Contraindicated in patients with creatinine
`clearance\45 ml/min
`No adjustment in hepatic failure
`
`Ipragliflozin
`
`100–300 mg
`once daily
`
`65
`
`Dose limited to 100 mg once daily in patients
`with eGFR[45\60 ml/min/1.73 m2
`Not recommended in patients with
`eGFR\45 ml/min/1.73 m2
`eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, N/a not available, UGT uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase
`
`UGT1A9 and
`UGT2B4
`
`patients on dapagliflozin has been evaluated in
`a
`study on insulin-mediated whole-body
`glucose uptake
`and endogenous
`glucose
`production using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic
`clamp technique. Dapagliflozin treatment for
`2 weeks
`increased
`insulin-mediated
`tissue
`glucose disposal by 18% and resulted in an
`increase in endogenous glucose production
`(with increased fasting glucagon levels) [15].
`
`PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS
`
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors use
`leads to a reduction in body weight, ranging
`from about 1 to 5 kg [16]. A greater fall is seen in
`patients with long-standing diabetes and in
`those with a higher baseline weight. This
`
`weight loss is sustained after up to 2 years of
`use of dapagliflozin, and may be linked to a
`reduction in insulin dose requirements of
`patients with long-standing diabetes
`[16].
`Analysis
`of
`208-week
`data
`comparing
`dapagliflozin in combination with metformin
`versus
`glimepiride
`in combination with
`metformin showed 4.38 kg (95% CI -5.31,
`-3.46) difference between two groups. Patients
`in the glimepiride group gained a mean of
`0.73 kg while those in dapagliflozin group lost
`3.65 kg [13].
`While it may be argued that weight loss is
`because of volume depletion, it has been shown
`that two-thirds of the decreased weight is lost
`from fat mass (especially visceral abnormal fat),
`as compared to lean mass [14]. An initially rapid
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00004
`
`

`

`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`Table 4 Glucose-lowering efficacy of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`
`Parameter
`
`Monotherapy Combination with other oral anti-diabetic drugs
`
`Initial
`combination
`with Met
`
`With
`Met
`
`With
`SU
`
`With
`Met 1 SU
`
`With
`Met 1 TZD
`
`Molecule
`(duration of
`study)
`
`Canagliflozin
`300 mg
`(26-week study)
`
`Dapagliflozin
`10 mg
`(24-week study)
`
`HbA1c (%) -1.03
`FPG (mg/dl) -35
`PPG (mg/dl) -59
`HbA1c (%) -0.9
`FPG (mg/dl) -28.8
`
`PPG (mg/dl) –
`HbA1c (%) -1.29
`FPG (mg/dl) -39.4
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`-2.0
`-60.4
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`
`359
`
`As add-
`on to
`insulin
`
`-0.72
`-25
`
`–
`-0.9
`-21.7
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`
`-0.94 -0.79 -1.06
`-27
`-31
`-48
`–
`–
`-0.8 -0.8 -1.0
`-23.5 -28.5 -29.6
`-60.6 -67.5
`–
`-0.48 -1.14 -0.88
`-38
`-41
`
`-1.03
`-33
`
`–
`-0.4
`-24.1
`
`–
`
`–
`
`–
`
`Ipragliflozin
`300 mg
`(24 week study)
`FPG fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, Met metformin, MetXR metformin extended release, PPG post-
`prandial plasma glucose, SU sulfonylurea, TZD thiazolidinedione
`
`decline in weight is followed by a slower rate of
`weight loss, and is also marked by a reduction in
`weight circumference. Concomitant use of
`SGLT2i can attenuate or neutralize weight gain
`due to insulin, if given in combination with
`insulin [16].
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`also cause significant
`reductions
`in both
`systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP).
`These changes are relatively more prominent
`for systolic BP, are not dose dependent, and are
`not characterized by concomitant tachycardia
`or symptoms of hypotension/syncope in most
`of the cases. The effects on BP seem to be
`independent of glycemic or body weight
`reduction, and are greater in patients with
`high baseline systolic BP [17]. BP reduction
`with SGLT2i occurs due to osmotic diuresis
`initially, and to local rennin-angiotensin system
`inhibition later on [18]. Some studies have
`reported reduction of up to 13.4–17 mmHg in
`systolic BP with empagliflozin, a magnitude
`similar
`to that observed with many anti-
`hypersensitive drugs
`[19, 20]. A recently
`
`of
`study
`outcome
`104-week
`published
`canagliflozin showed that the 100 and 300 mg
`dose reduced systolic and diastolic BP compared
`with glimepiride, with no notable changes in
`pulse rate [20]. Analysis of 208-week data
`comparing dapagliflozin in combination with
`metformin versus glimepiride with metformin
`showed an increase of 0.2 mmHg (95% CI
`-1.66, 1.61) in the glimepiride group while
`those on dapagliflozin showed a reduction of
`3.69 mmHg (95% CI -5.24, -2.14) [13].
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`are either lipid-friendly or lipid-neutral drugs.
`Canagliflozin,
`for example,
`increases high-
`density lipoprotein (HDL) by 7.1–10.6%, low-
`density lipoprotein (LDL) by 7.1%, and reduces
`triglycerides by 2.3% [21, 22]. Treatment with
`canagliflozin for 104 weeks was also associated
`with increases in HDL-C and LDL-C, which is
`consistent with findings at week 52. However,
`the proportion of patients who started or
`modified therapy with lipid-modifying agents
`were
`13%,
`11.5%,
`and
`13.3% in the
`canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin 300 mg,
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00005
`
`

`

`360
`
`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`and glimepiride groups, respectively [23]. After
`4 years of use, sustained and stable weight loss
`was observed with dapagliflozin versus weight
`gain with glimepiride (-3.95 vs. ?1.12 kg).
`Mean
`systolic
`BP was
`reduced with
`dapagliflozin but not with glimepiride [24].
`Data from 21 clinical studies, including 2
`that exclusively enrolled patients with a history
`of cardiovascular disease (CVD), were included
`in a prespecified meta-analysis (n = 9,339) to
`assess
`the
`cardiovascular
`(CV)
`safety of
`to[10 mg/day;
`dapagliflozin
`(2.5 mg
`n = 5,936) versus
`comparators
`(placebo or
`active n = 3,403) [25]. The prespecified primary
`end point was a composite of time to CV death,
`myocardial
`infarction
`(MI),
`stroke,
`or
`hospitalization for unstable
`angina. The
`secondary end point included the primary end
`point
`plus
`unplanned
`coronary
`revascularization and hospitalization for heart
`failure. The estimated hazard ratio (HR) using a
`Cox proportional hazards method was 0.787
`(95% CI 0.579, 1.070). Analyses of
`the
`secondary end point (HR 0.758; 95% CI 0.581,
`0.988) and of an ad-hoc major adverse CV
`events composite end point of CV death, MI,
`and stroke (HR 0.772; 95% CI 0.543, 1.097) were
`consistent with the primary end point results.
`These findings suggest that there is no increase
`in CV risk associated with dapagliflozin in an
`updated CV risk analysis that includes more
`patients and a substantial proportion of older
`patients ([20%) and patients with established
`CVD ([30%). Although these
`results are
`encouraging, presently the evidence is lacking
`regarding
`macro
`and
`micro-vascular
`complications of T2DM in patients managed
`with this
`class of drugs. A randomized-
`controlled clinical trial is already underway to
`explore the long-term CV outcomes in patients
`on treatment with SGLT2i as primary end point
`[26].
`
`Uric acid levels, a marker of metabolic
`dysfunction, are markedly reduced (5.9–17.8%)
`by SGLT2i, with the effect sustained for 2 years
`[27]. The drugs may affect uric acid excretion
`directly, by acting on its transport system, or
`indirectly, but reducing sodium reabsorption in
`the PCT. The beneficial impact of SGLT2i on
`uric acid is attenuated if insulin is co-prescribed.
`Renal hyperfiltration has been found to be
`closely associated with the development of
`diabetic nephropathy (DN) [28]. Pooled data
`from 2 randomized clinical trials including 600
`patients with normo- or microalbuminuria
`followed up for 4 years which demonstrated
`that hyperfiltration has
`central
`role
`in
`pathogenesis of DN [28]. SGLT2 is one of the
`main
`determinants
`of
`glomerular
`hyperfiltration and blockade of SGLT2 has
`potential nephroprotective action.
`
`POSOLOGY
`
`Dapagliflozin is approved as 10 mg once-daily
`drug,
`as monotherapy, or as
`add-on to
`metformin,
`sulfonylurea
`(SU),
`dipeptidyl
`peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and/or insulin.
`It can be prescribed alone to persons who do
`not tolerate or cannot take metformin safely. A
`5-mg dose is available for persons with hepatic
`insufficiency.
`In mild to moderate hepatic
`impairment, no dosage adjustment is required.
`However, in severe hepatic impairment, 5 mg
`starting dose is recommended [29].
`Canagliflozin has a two-stage dosage regime.
`The starting dose approved is 100 mg once
`daily, before the first meal of the day. In those
`who do not respond adequately, the dose can be
`increased to 300 mg, provided renal function is
`normal [10].
`Empagliflozin is being studied in daily doses
`of 10 and 25 mg. Trials have revealed dose-
`dependent
`HbA1c
`reductions
`with
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00006
`
`

`

`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`361
`
`empagliflozin monotherapy, which are greater
`as compared to those observed with sitagliptin,
`but
`similar
`to
`those
`experienced with
`metformin. Empagliflozin can be administered
`without relation to meal timings, in a once-
`daily frequency [30].
`Ipragliflozin has Japanese approval for the
`treatment of T2DM,
`either
`alone or
`in
`combination with metformin, pioglitazone,
`SU, a-glucosidase inhibitor, DPP-4 inhibitor, or
`with nateglinide [30].
`
`ADVERSE EVENTS
`
`The incidence of adverse events in clinical trials
`of SGLT2i is similar to that observed with other
`anti-diabetic drugs. The overall
`incidence of
`adverse events has ranged from 57.3 to 83.0%,
`while that of serious adverse events have varied
`between 1.0% and 12.6% [31].
`Uro-genital tract infections are the most
`frequently noticed adverse events in subjects
`on SGLT2i [32], especially in women and in
`uncircumcised men. Pooled data from 12
`placebo-controlled
`clinical
`trials
`of
`dapagliflozin reveal that when used in dose
`2.5, 5, and 10 mg per day, the incidence of
`clinically diagnosed uro-genital tract infection
`was 4.1%, 5.7% and 4.8%, respectively, while it
`was 0.9% in the placebo group [33]. Common
`infections include vulvitis and vulvo-vaginitis
`in women,
`as well
`as
`balanitis
`and
`balanoposthitis
`in men.
`These
`can be
`prevented by maintaining adequate perineal
`hygiene,
`and
`through
`treatment with
`antifungal
`therapy. Genital
`infections
`are
`thought to be caused by an increased glucose
`load in the urinary tract, which encourages
`fungal growth. The incidence of urinary tract
`infections does not
`increase with SGLT2i
`therapy [34].
`
`The osmotic diuresis associated with SGLT2i
`use also has the potential to cause volume
`depletion and orthostatic hypotension.
`In
`randomized-controlled trials, however,
`the
`incidence of these adverse events has been
`minimal (\3%) [25]. All such events have been
`mild to moderate in severity. The extra diuresis
`experienced per day is 350–450 ml (one extra
`void per day) [34], and does not cause nocturia.
`The diuresis seen with SGLT2i may result in
`slight transient increase in serum creatinine and
`blood urea, with a corresponding fall
`in
`glomerular filtration rate (GFR).
`The risk of hypoglycemia is minimal with
`SGLT2i, as
`they have a non-insulin-based
`mechanism of action. However, hypoglycemia
`may occur when these molecules are used in
`complication with other anti-diabetic drugs,
`including metformin. Four-year comparison
`between dapagliflozin plus metformin and
`glipizide plus metformin showed a tenfold
`decrease in the incidence of hypoglycemic
`episodes (5.4% and 51.5%, respectively) [13].
`In this 208-week study, patients treated with
`dapagliflozin
`plus metformin
`had
`35
`hypoglycemic events as compared to 1,191
`events
`in glipizide plus metformin group.
`Dose-down titration during first year was
`required in 2.7% patients in the dapagliflozin-
`treated group compared with 15.8% in the
`glipizide-treated group. This finding is very
`significant
`in
`light
`of
`the
`long-term
`consequences of hypoglycemic episodes on the
`physiology of patients and their compliance to
`treatment.
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`use leads
`to a slight
`reduction in bone
`formation, and a rise in bone resorption
`markers, although there are no major changes
`on bone mineral density. A 102-week study
`with dapagliflozin did not identify any changes
`in markers of bone turnover as compared to
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00007
`
`

`

`362
`
`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`placebo when added to metformin [27]. Other
`long-term studies have not demonstrated any
`significant increase in adverse drug reactions
`related with skeletal system with any of the
`SGLT2i [35, 36].
`
`USE IN RENAL IMPAIRMENT
`
`In patients with reduced GFR, the amount of
`glucose reaching the PCT falls and the efficacy
`of SGLT2 may be suboptimal. Canagliflozin is
`prescribed in a full dose of 300 mg daily if GFR is
`above 60 ml/min and as 100 mg once daily if
`GFR is 45–60 ml/min [10]. Dapagliflozin can be
`prescribed as 5 or 10 mg once daily, depending
`upon the regulatory label
`in the country
`concerned [29]. A pooled analysis of 13
`clinical trials exploring the long-term renal
`safety of dapagliflozin 10 mg as compared to
`placebo or other oral hypoglycemic agents
`showed no change in renal functions over a
`period varying from 12 to 104 weeks [25].
`Similarly, empagliflozin is being studied in
`doses of 10 and 25 mg per day [37].
`
`DRUG–DRUG INTERACTIONS
`
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors do
`not exhibit any clinically relevant drug–drug
`interactions, including with other anti-diabetic
`drugs and diuretics. They can be combined with
`metformin, SU, pioglitazone, sitagliptin, and
`voglibose. Concomitant prescription of loop
`diuretics
`and SGLT2i
`should be
`avoided
`because of
`the potential
`risk for volume
`depletion. Co-administration of canagliflozin
`with UGT-inducer
`drugs,
`for
`example,
`rifampicin, phenytoin, phenobarbitone, and
`ritonavir, should prompt an increase in dose
`from 100 to 300 mg, if otherwise tolerated [10].
`UGT enzyme-inducing agents
`increase the
`
`metabolism of canagliflozin thus leading to a
`decrease in peak plasma levels and reduced
`efficacy [32].
`
`CLINICAL USE
`
`is
`diabetes
`of
`Current management
`characterized by opportunities, options, and
`obstacles. In spite of the availability of a wide
`array of oral and injectable options, it remains
`difficult
`to achieve good glycemic control,
`while avoiding hypoglycemia and weight gain,
`and ensuring CV safety. These adverse effects
`are
`obstacles
`to
`the
`optimal
`use
`of
`pharmaceuticals options currently available.
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`are a novel class of drugs with a novel
`mechanism of action, which can be useful in
`almost every stage of the natural history of
`diabetes, and represent a means of achieving
`better and safer glycemic control.
`Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors
`can be used as initial monotherapy in persons
`in whom metformin is not indicated, or not
`tolerated. Examples include those with hepatic
`impairment and gastrointestinal
`intolerance.
`SGLT2i can also be used as second-line drugs,
`and third-line drugs, in persons inadequately
`controlled on a single or dual glucose-lowering
`therapy. Their glucose-lowering effect may help
`some people with diabetes delay insulin
`injections. Additionally, a significantly low risk
`of hypoglycemia with these agents can improve
`outcomes and compliance considerably.
`The pleiotropic effects of SGLT2i—weight
`loss, BP reduction, and uricosuria—make them
`especially attractive for use in persons with
`metabolic syndrome, and in those with mild
`fluid
`overload.
`Their
`oral mode
`of
`administration may favor their use over the
`injectable
`glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
`agonists.
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00008
`
`

`

`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`363
`
`This class of drugs can also be used in
`combination with insulin, and its
`insulin-
`sparing effect allows for more effective, well-
`tolerated glycemic control, without weight
`gain. A 24-week clinical
`trial
`comparing
`dapagliflozin versus placebo in patients taking
`a high dose of insulin demonstrated a decrease
`in insulin requirement of 0.79% and 0.39%,
`respectively [38]. Additionally,
`there was a
`significant decrease in insulin dose required by
`patients treated with dapagliflozin as compared
`to an increase in placebo group. A statistically
`significant decrease in body weight of up to
`2.4 kg in the dapagliflozin 10 mg group as
`compared to an increase of 0.43 kg in the
`placebo group was also seen [38].
`The ability to prescribe SGLT2i to persons
`with renal [39] and hepatic impairment, an easy
`two-step or one-step dose titration, a lack of
`relevant drug–drug interactions, and safety in
`combination with all routinely used CV and
`anti-diabetic drugs, are all points which will
`encourage their use.
`Counseling regarding potential side effects
`and ways
`to prevent
`them,
`for example,
`perineal hygiene and avoidance of volume
`depletion,
`must
`accompany
`SGLT2i
`prescription.
`A recent pilot study explored the potential
`role of SGLT2i
`in managing hyperglycemia
`associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus
`(T1DM) [40]. This 2-week exploratory study of
`dapagliflozin in doses ranging from 1 to 10 mg
`per day in addition to insulin, established its
`safety and pharmacokinetics, and explored the
`pharmacodynamics of a new class of drug for
`managing T1DM. Glucosuria increased by
`88 mg/day in the dapagliflozin group while it
`decreased by 21.5 mg/day in the placebo group.
`Additionally, a fall of 16.2% in the dapagliflozin
`group and an increase of 1.7% in the placebo
`group for total daily insulin dose were seen
`
`during this period [40]. More proof-of-concept
`studies
`are
`available
`documenting
`reno-
`protection provided by these agents in T1DM.
`Renal hyperfiltration which is
`an early
`hemodynamic abnormality preceding frank
`nephropathy in T1DM was improved with
`short-term use of these agents [41, 42]. Newer
`SGLT2i, still in pre-clinical and clinical phases
`of development, are expected to have a safer
`profile in view of their highly selective action
`[43, 44].
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`The SGLT2i represent a novel class of drugs
`which will certainly help a large number of
`people with diabetes achieve target control in a
`safe and well-tolerated manner. Their unique
`mechanism of action, coupled with pleiotropic
`benefits on weight and blood pressure, should
`make them attractive choices
`for add-on
`therapy to persons not controlled on other
`medications.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
`
`No funding or sponsorship was received for this
`study or publication of this article. Sanjay Kalra
`meets the ICMJE criteria for authorship for this
`manuscript, takes responsibility for the integrity
`of the work as a whole, and has given final
`approval for the version to be published.
`
`of
`
`Conflict
`
`interest. Sanjay Kalra has
`speakership
`honoraria
`from
`received
`AstraZeneca for speaking on topics not related
`to the subject matter of this review.
`
`Compliance with ethics guidelines. This
`review article is based on previously conducted
`studies, and does not involve any new studies of
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00009
`
`

`

`364
`
`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`human or animal subjects performed by the
`author.
`
`Open Access. This article is distributed
`under the terms of the Creative Commons
`Attribution Noncommercial License which
`permits any noncommercial use, distribution,
`and reproduction in any medium, provided the
`original author(s) and the source are credited.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`the
`Abdul GM, DeFronzo R. Dapagliflozin for
`treatment of
`type 2 diabetes. Expert Opin
`Pharmacother. 2013;14:1695–703.
`
`Bailey CJ. Renal glucose reabsorption inhibitors to
`treat
`diabetes.
`Trends
`Pharmacol
`Sci.
`2011;32:63–71.
`
`Ehrenkranz J, Lewis N, Ronald KC, Roth J. Phlorizin:
`a review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;21:31–8.
`
`4. Wright EM. Renal Na?-glucose cotransporters. Am J
`Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;280(1):F10–8.
`
`5.
`
`Lee YJ, Lee YJ, Han HJ. Regulatory mechanisms of
`Na(?)/glucose cotransporters in renal proximal
`tubule cells. Kidney Int Suppl. 2007;(106):S27–35.
`
`6. Hummel CS, Lu C, Loo DD, Hirayama BA, Voss AA,
`Wright EM. Glucose transport by human renal
`NA?/D-glucose cotransporters SGLT1 and SGLT2.
`Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2011;300:C721.
`
`7. Nauck MA. Update on developments with SGLT2
`inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes.
`Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014;8:1335–80.
`
`8. Mudaliar S, Henry R, Boden G, et al. Changes in
`insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion with the
`sodium glucose
`cotransporter
`2
`inhibitor
`dapagliflozin.
`Diabetes
`Technol
`Ther.
`2014;16:137–44.
`
`9.
`
`Kasichayanula S, Liu X, LaCreta F, Griffen S,
`Boulton D. Clinical
`pharmacokinetics
`and
`pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin, a selective
`inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2.
`Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53:17–27.
`
`Janssen
`10. Canagliflozin prescribing information,
`Pharmaceuticals. 2014. https://www.invokanahcp.
`com/prescribing-information.pdf.
`
`J, et al. Dapagliflozin
`11. Zhang L, Feng Y, List
`treatment in patients with different stages of type
`2 diabetes mellitus: effects on glycaemic control
`and
`body weight. Diabetes Obes Metab.
`2010;12:510–6.
`
`12. Lavalle-Gonza´lez FJ, Januszewicz A, Davidson J,
`et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared
`with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2
`diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a
`randomised trial. Diabetologia. 2013;56:2582–92.
`
`13. Rohwedder K, Johnsson E, Parikh S. Reduced risk of
`hypoglycemic
`events with dapagliflozin vs.
`glipizide as add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes
`mellitus: 4-year data from a phase 3 study. In:
`Poster presented at 50th Annual meeting of the
`European Association for the Study of Diabetes.
`Vienna; 2014.
`
`14. Rosenstock J, Jelaska A, Wang F, et al. Empagliflozin
`as add- on to basal insulin for 78 weeks improves
`glycemic control with weight loss in insulin-treated
`type
`2 diabetes
`(T2DM). Can J Diabetes.
`2013;37:S32.
`
`15. Merovci A, Solis-Herrera C, Daniele G, et al.
`Dapagliflozin improves muscle insulin sensitivity
`but enhances endogenous glucose production.
`J Clin Invest. 2014;124:509–14.
`
`16. Scheen A. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
`profile of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-
`transporter 2 inhibitor. Clin Pharmacokinet.
`2014;53(3):213–25.
`
`17. Vasilakou D, Karagiannis T, Athanasiadou E, et al.
`Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for type
`2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
`Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:262–74.
`
`18. Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D, Wie L, Leslie B,
`List J. Dapagliflozin a glucose-regulating drug with
`diuretic properties in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
`Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:853–62.
`
`19. Tikkanen I, Narko K, Zeller C, et al. Empagliflozin
`improves blood pressure in patients with type 2
`diabetes (T2DM) and hypertension. In: Abstract 942
`presented at the 49th European Association for the
`Study of Diabetes Annual Meeting, September
`23–27,
`Barcelona,
`Spain.
`Diabetologia
`2013;56:S377.
`
`Januszewicz A, Gilbert RE, Lavalle
`20. Weir MR,
`Gonzalez FJ, Meininger G. Lower blood pressure
`(BP) with canagliflozin (cana) in subjects with type
`2
`diabetes
`mellitus
`(T2DM).
`Diabetes.
`2013;62(Suppl 1):Abstract 1077-P.
`
`21. Leiter LA, Yoon KH, Arias P, et al. Canagliflozin
`provides durable glycemic improvements and body
`
`Novo Nordisk Exhibit 2376
`Mylan Pharms. Inc. v. Novo Nordisk A/S
`IPR2023-00724
`Page 00010
`
`

`

`Diabetes Ther (2014) 5:355–366
`
`365
`
`weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride
`in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a
`randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study diabetes
`care. 2014. (pii: DC_132762). [Epub ahead of print].
`
`al.
`et
`A,
`S, Devineni D, Ghosh
`22. Sha
`a
`Pharmacodynamic
`effects of
`canagliflozin,
`sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, from a
`randomized study in patients with type 2 diabetes.
`PLoS One. 2014;9:e105638.
`
`23. Hach T, Gerich J, Salsali A et al. Empagliflozin
`improves glycaemic parameters and cardiovascular
`risk factors in patients with type 2 di

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket