throbber
Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 2510-2513, May 1980
`Biochemistry
`Functional incorporation of synthetic glycolipids into cells
`(concanavalin A/agglutination/erythrocytes/liposome exchange/hydrophilic spacer arm)
`R. R. RANDO, J. SLAMA*, AND F. W. BANGERTER
`Department of Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
`Communicated by E. R. Blout, February 4,1980
`
`Synthetic glycolipids containing an a-man-
`ABSTRACT
`noside group linked by a hydrophilic spacer arm to cholesterol
`were incorporated into bovine erythrocytes by exchange from
`glycolipid-containing liposomes. When the distance between
`the sugar and the cholesterol moieties was approximately 26 A,
`functional incorporation of these glycolipids could be easily
`detected, as revealed by the concanavalin A-mediated aggluti-
`nation of these cells. Bovine erythrocytes are not themselves
`susceptible to concanavalin A-mediated agglutination. The
`minimal concentration of concanavalin A required for a lu-
`tination of modified erythrocytes, containing 9.15 X lO1gly-
`colipid molecules per cell, was 4 Ag/ml. Under these conditions,
`only approximately 4% of the membrane-bound cholesterol had
`been exchanged for the synthetic glycolipid. The observed
`aggregation was reversible in the presence of a-methyl man-
`noside and did not occur when ,-galactosyl-containing gly-
`colipids were used in place of their a-mannoside isomers. These
`studies demonstrate a technique of sugar incorporation into cell
`membranes which should be of great advantage in studies on
`the roles of cell surface sugars in biological recognition. Fur-
`thermore, they demonstrate that the sugars need only be a short
`distance (26 A) from the membrane in order to functionally bind
`concanavalin A.
`Cell surface sugars have been implicated in various cellular
`recognition phenomena. On the surface of mammalian cells
`they function as virus, bacterial, and toxin receptors and are
`implicated as mediators in cell-cell adhesion (1). An approach
`to understanding the roles that cell surface sugars play in these
`phenomena involves the incorporation of chemically defined
`sugars onto the cell surface. The reconstitution or modulation
`of a recognition response as a consequence of the incorporation
`of a specific sugar or sequence of sugars can be taken as evi-
`
`the liberated aldehyde groups (2, 3). This method can be less
`than optimal because of the required chemical alteration of the
`membrane and the fact that the sugars are introduced in a
`random, nonuniform array. A second possible method that
`could potentially circumvent these difficulties, and hence po-
`tentially generate more information, is one involving the non-
`covalent incorporation of amphipathic sugar-containing
`compounds into the cell membrane. Synthetic glycolipids
`containing cholesterol as an anchor, linked by a spacer group
`to a sugar (structure I), can be incorporated into small unila-
`mellar liposomes, and these derivatized liposomes are rendered
`susceptible to aggregation by the appropriate lectins (4). The
`cholesterol-containing synthetic glycolipids distribute evenly
`on both sides of the bilayer and exhibit a condensing effect
`above the phase transition of both lipids (5). By these and other
`criteria the cholesterol analogs appear to be bound in the
`membrane much like cholesterol itself, with the polar oxygen
`being near the phosphate head group (6).
`Synthetic glycolipids analogous to structure I cannot im-
`mediately be applied to cells because of the hydrophobic nature
`of the spacer groups. It could be anticipated that due to the cell
`surface glycoproteins, relatively large distances between the
`sugar residue and cholesterol anchor would have to be achieved
`before the sugar could functionally interact with a binding
`protein. Simply polymerizing hydrophobic spacers of the am-
`inocaproyl type would not be expected to yield fruitful results.
`The hydrophobic chains would either "ball up" and interact
`with themselves in the aqueous environment or they would
`dissolve in the lipid bilayer. Neither situation would be fruitful
`for functional incorporation studies because the sugar residue
`
`of-Mannoside
`
`I
`
`HO
`
`CH20H
`
`OH
`o0
`
`0
`0
`HO ~~ --(CH2)2-NH-(C--(CH2-0O-CH2)2-CH2-NH),,-C,-0
`II
`a-Mannoside
`would remain sequestered too close to the membrane to interact
`dence for the functional role(s) of these sugars in the response.
`with binding proteins. In order to circumvent this problem we
`A crucial step here is to devise specific ways to introduce sugars
`have developed a hydrophilic spacer group that combines the
`onto the cellular membrane. A chemical method has been
`water solubility of ethers with the ease of polymerization of
`formulated which involves the periodate oxidation of the sialic
`amino acids. In this communication we show that synthetic
`acid side chain of membrane-bound glycoproteins, followed
`glycolipids containing 3,6-dioxa-8-aminooctanoic acid-based
`by the condensation of sugar-containing acyl hydrazides with
`spacer groups can be functionally incorporated into cells.
`Abbreviation: Con A, concanavalin A.
`* Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Chicago,
`Chicago, IL 60637.
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page
`charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "ad-
`vertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate
`this fact.
`
`2510
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Biochemistry: Rando et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 (1980)
`
`2511
`
`glycolipids and the hydrophilic spacer groups will be published
`in detail dsewhere. The [6-3H]galactosyl-containing glycolipid
`used here was synthesized by treating the galactosyl-containing
`glycolipid with galactose oxidase followed by NaB3H4 reduction
`according to a published procedure (5).
`The concentrations of the sugar cholesterol compounds were
`determined by enzymatic assay of the free mannose after
`mercuric ion-catalyzed hydrolysis of the 1-thioglycoside linkage
`(9). To a solution of the cholesterol-mannose derivative (0.1-2
`jumol) in ethanol (1 ml) was added 0.2 M mercuric acetate in
`0.1 M acetic acid (0.1 ml). After 2 hr at 600C, the incubation
`mixture was treated with 2-mercaptoethanol (10,Ml) and the
`solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was
`suspended in H20 (0.5 ml), shaken vigorously, and centrifuged
`in a clinical centrifuge. The liberated mannose was assayed by
`coupling the ADP produced by the hexokinase/ATP-catalyzed
`phosphorylation of the hexose to the enzyme system of pyruvate
`kinase/phosphoenolpyruvate and lactate dehydrogenase/
`NADH (4).
`The liposomes containing the synthetic glycolipids were
`prepared as described (4, 10). After sonication, the glycoli-
`pid-bearing liposomes were centrifuged at 12,000 X g to re-
`move insoluble material. The clear supernatant containing the
`unilamellar and multilamellar liposomes was then used in the
`exchange reactions with bovine erythrocytes. The erythrocytes
`were collected in heparin/phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4)
`from a local slaughterhouse on the day that they were to be
`used. The erythrocytes were repeatedly washed with ice-cold
`phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and centrifuged (2000 X
`g) three or more times. The buffy coat was removed by aspi-
`ration. The cells were continuously washed until no more white
`layer appeared. The cells were then incubated with the gly-
`colipid-containing liposomes at 370C for varying periods of
`time. The cells were centrifuged at 5000 X g and washed three
`times with phosphate-buffered saline. These cells were then
`used in the aggregation studies.
`
`3000
`
`V2000
`(D
`0.'
`
`1000 _
`
`00C E o
`
`20
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`15
`% glycolipid
`FIG. 2.
`Incorporation of glycolipids at varying concentrations
`into bovine erythrocytes. Liposomes were prepared containing 2, 5,
`8, and 15% of the [6-3H]galactosyl-containing glycolipid. The con-
`centration of phospholipid was adjusted to 10 ,umol/ml in each case.
`One milliliter of washed erythrocytes (6 X 108 cells) in phosphate-
`buffered saline was incubated with 40 M1 of each of the above stock
`solutions. After a 2-hr incubation, the samples were washed and lysed
`and radioactivity was measured.
`
`600_
`
`0)
`
`o
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Time, hr
`Incorporation of glycolipids into bovine erythrocytes.
`FIG. 1.
`Liposomes were prepared containing 5 mol % [6-3H]galactosyl-con-
`taining glycolipid (M, = 796), #B-[6_3HjGal-S-(CH2)2-NH-C0-
`(CH2-0CH2)2-CH2-NH-CO2Cho1 (specific activity, 2.35 X 105
`cpm/,umnol). The stock solution of the liposomes was 10,umiol of
`phospholipid per ml as determined by phosphate assay. To test tubes
`containing 6.9 X 108 cells in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline was
`added 40 ul (4770 cpm) of the transparent liposomal preparation. The
`erythrocytes were incubated for various periods of time at 37°C with
`shaking in a Dubinoff shaking bath. At the indicated times the cells
`were centrifuged at 3000 X g and washed three times with 10 ml of
`phosphate-buffered saline. The final pellet was lysed in 10 ml of 10
`mM potassium phosphate (pHI 7.5). The membrane pellet was cen-
`trifuged at 27,000 X g for 10 min and washed twice with 10 ml of the
`phosphate buffer. The final pellet was dissolved in Aquasol (New
`England Nuclear) and radioactivity was measured.
`Specifically, we show that bovine erythrocytes, which cannot
`be agglutinated by the c-mannosyl binding lectin concanavalin
`A (Con A), can be rendered so as a consequence of the incor-
`poration of synthetic glycolipids of the type shown in structure
`II. Furthermore, we show that the distance requirement from
`the cholesterol anchor to the sugar in order for Con A-mediated
`aggregation to occur is relatively modest (n = 2).
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Con A (three times recrystallized) was purchased from Miles.
`Solutions of Con A in 50 mM Tris-HCl/140 mM CaC12 were
`centrifuged at 5000 x g for 5 min before use. The concentra-
`tions of Con A solutions were determined by absorbance
`readings at 280 nm (Alcmg/ml = 1.3). Egg phosphatidylcholine
`was prepared and purified by the method of Litman (7). The
`phospholipid concentrations were determined as inorganic
`phosphate after ashing and acid hydrolysis (8). The phospho-
`lipid was dissolved in benzene at a concentration of 40 ,umol/ml
`and stored at -70°C under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The
`purity of the preparation was checked routinely by thin-layer
`chromatography (silicic acid; CHC13/CE[30H/H20, 65:25:4).
`The glycolipids were prepared by a procedure similar to that
`already published (4, 5). The main differences were that the
`thiosugar was alkylated with N-trifluoroacetamido iodo-
`ethane instead of with N-trifluoroacetamido iodohexane and
`the coupling reaction was done with N-trifluoro-31,6-dioxaoc-
`tanoic acid instead of with N-trifluoroacetyl aminocaproic acid.
`These changes eliminated the hydrophobicity of the earlier
`spacer groups. All of the compounds used here gave satisfactory
`elemental analyses, and their NMR and infrared spectra were
`entirely consistent with the assigned structures. Full details of
`the synthesis of a-D-mannosyl- and fl-Dgalactosyl-containing
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`ezj0512
`
`Biochemistry: Rando et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 (1980)
`
`shown. Rough linearity was observed in both cases at low
`phospholipid concentrations.
`The a-D-mannosyl-containing synthetic glycolipids of the
`type shown in Structure II were prepared, incorporated into
`liposomes, and exchanged into the bovine erythrocytes. The
`modified erythrocytes were then treated with varying con-
`centrations of Con A and the extent of agglutination was as-
`sessed with microtiter plates (2). The results of these experi-
`ments are shown in Table 1. These experiments show that
`functional incorporation of the synthetic glycolipids into the
`bovine erythrocytes was achieved. The effect was specific for
`the a-mannosyl residue because f3-galactosyl-containing gly-
`colipids were not agglutinable and the agglutination response
`in the presence of II was specifically blocked by added
`a-mannosides but not by f3-galactosides. In addition, cells
`treated with pure phosphatidylcholine-based liposomes were
`also not rendered agglutinable by Con A. Furthermore, the
`incorporation was reversible. Bovine erythrocytes containing
`II (n = 2 or 4) were rendered nonagglutinable by Con A by
`simply incubating them with cholesterol-containing liposomes.
`The synthetic glycolipids exchanged out of the cells as the
`cholesterol exchanged in. By microscopic reversibility, then,
`the synthetic glycolipid must have been incorporated into the
`erythrocyte by an exchange process rather than by another
`process such as fusion. The synthetic glycolipids are, however,
`bound in the erythrocyte membrane in a stable form in the
`absence of exchange-mediating liposomes. It is of interest to
`compare the effects of the spacer group length on the suscep-
`tibility of the modified erythrocytes to aggregate. When n =
`0 or 1 (II), aggregation either did not proceed or it proceeded
`poorly, requiring relatively large amounts of Con A. When n
`= 2 or 4 (II), aggregation proceeded rapidly at 4 jig of Con A
`per ml. The distance from the sulfur group to the carbamate
`carboxyl group is approximately 16 A in II (n = 1) and 26 A in
`II (n = 2). We have shown that within experimental error gly-
`colipids with one or two spacer groups are incorporated to the
`
`Table 1.
`
`Glycolipid
`
`Lowest lectin concentration that causes agglutination of
`native and modified bovine erythrocytes
`Concen-
`a-Methyl
`mannoside,
`tration,
`mM
`%
`
`ConA,
`Ug ml-l*
`>500
`>500
`>500
`>500
`50
`4
`>500
`4
`>500
`
`t
`10
`10
`5
`15
`5
`5
`5
`5
`
`40
`-
`40
`
`I
`II (n =0)
`II (monomeric spacer, n = 1)
`II (monomeric spacer, n = 1)
`II (dimeric spacer, n = 2)
`II (dimeric spacer, n = 2)
`II (tetrameric spacer, n = 4)
`II (tetrameric spacer, n = 4)
`III (fl-Gal-dimeric spacer,
`n = 2)
`>500
`10
`To 1 ml of washed erythrocytes in phosphate-buffered saline (5 X
`108 cells) was added 0.1 ml of liposome (10 ,umol/phospholipid mol-
`ecule per ml of phosphate-buffered saline) containing the synthetic
`glycolipid at the indicated concentrations. The samples were incu-
`bated with shaking at 37°C for 2 hr; the cells were then thoroughly
`washed and resuspended in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. Fifty
`microliters of the prepared cells was placed in microtiter wells along
`with 50,ul of various concentrations of Con A in phosphate-buffered
`saline. The cells were allowed to remain at room temperature for 2 hr
`and then agglutination was scored. In the absence of liposomes, no
`agglutination occurred. In the presence of a-methyl mannoside at the
`indicated concentration, agglutination did not occur. When aggluti-
`nation was positive by this assay, the results were checked by micro-
`scopic examination. In all instances, the results from both determi-
`nations concurred.
`* Lowest concentration to cause agglutination.
`t Liposomes were used without glycolipid in this experiment.
`
`~0
`
`00 1000A
`
`0.0
`
`C E
`
`0
`
`2
`
`6
`8
`10
`1 2
`4
`Phospholipid, uM X 10-2
`
`1 4
`
`16
`
`FIG. 3.
`Incorporation of glycolipids at varying liposome con-
`centrations into bovine erythrocytes. Liposomes containing 10%o of
`the [3Hlgalactosyl-containing glycolipid at a final phospholipid
`concentration of 10 imol/ml were made. To 1 ml of 7 X 108 cells in
`phosphate-buffered saline was added 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 ,1 of the
`liposomal preparation. The total volumes were kept constant by ad-
`dition of the appropriate amount of buffer to each sample. The cells
`were incubated at 370C with shaking for 2 hr and then washed and
`lysed. Radioactivity was then measured.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`The synthetic glycolipids were incorporated into the bovine
`erythrocytes by a liposome-exchange technique used for cho-
`lesterol exchange (11). Briefly, egg yolk phosphatidylcholine-
`based liposomes were prepared containing the synthetic gly-
`colipids. Simply incubating these liposomes with bovine
`erythrocytes allows an exchange process to occur between the
`synthetic glycolipids in the liposomes and the cholesterol in the
`erythrocytes. In Fig. 1 a time course for the incorporation of
`radioactive glycolipids into erythrocytes is shown under defined
`conditions. After about 1-2 hr, the exchange appeared to reach
`equilibrium. Under these conditions, the erythrocytes contained
`3.05 X 106 synthetic glycolipid molecules per cell. Given the
`average surface area of a bovine erythrocyte to be 109 ,um2, the
`average density of sites can be calculated to be 2.79 X 104
`sites/jm2, assuming that the synthetic glycolipids do not
`transverse the bilayer. The glycolipids used here cannot be
`incorporated into the erythrocytes by direct addition. Incu-
`bation of the erythrocytes with a dispersion of glycolipid gives
`approximately 5% of the amount bound to cells relative to the
`exchange technique. Under the conditions of the liposomal
`exchange technique, 17.2% of the total glycolipid incorporated
`in the liposomes exchanges with the erythrocytes.
`If a one-to-one exchange process is assumed, only approxi-
`mately 1-2% of the total cholesterol in the bovine erythrocyte
`has been exchanged with the synthetic glycolipids. In Fig. 2,
`the relationship between the percentage of glycolipid in the
`liposomes and the amount incorporated in the erythrocytes is
`shown. The total phospholipid concentration and time of in-
`cubation (2 hr) were kept constant in these experiments. In Fig.
`3, the relationship between the amount of phospholipid added
`(at a fixed percentage of glycolipid) and the amount incorpo-
`rated in the erythrocytes after a fixed incubation time (2 hr) is
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Biochemistry: Rando et al.
`
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 (1980)
`
`2513
`
`porated into the bovine erythrocytes by the periodate/
`a-mannosyl hydrazide method, the cells were agglutinated at
`a minimum concentration of 7.5 tug of Con A per ml (2).
`Therefore, both techniques give roughly equivalent results.
`In order to be certain that the aggregates formed upon the
`Con A-mediated agglutination of the modified erythrocytes
`were typical of agglutinated cells, photomicrographs were taken
`of control cells, modified and agglutinated cells, and modified
`and agglutinated cells with a-methyl mannoside. As can be
`judged from Fig. 4, the agglutinated cells look typical of ag-
`gregating cells and can be easily dispersed by added a-methyl
`mannoside. The latter results show that the aggregates were not
`the result of an irreversible process such as cell-cell fusion.
`When the sugar was added before the lectin, agglutination was
`prevented; when the sugar was added after, it was reversed.
`In this communication we have shown that synthetic cho-
`lesterol-containing glycolipids can be exchanged from liposomes
`into bovine erythrocytes. These cells, which normally cannot
`be agglutinated by Con A, can be rendered so by incorporating
`a-thiomannosyl-containing glycolipids into their outer mem-
`brane. One of the more surprising aspects of this work was the
`relatively modest distance requirement between the cholesterol
`anchor and the sugar needed for agglutination. This distance
`requirement is not dissimilar to that seen with these synthetic
`glycolipids in small unilamellar liposomes (4). Assuming that
`the cholesterol anchor is bound in the erythrocyte membrane
`in a way similar to the way it is bound in liposomes, this suggests
`that the glycoprotein coat of the erythrocyte does not prevent
`access of so large a protein as Con A close to the bilayer. This
`technique of sugar incorporation is, of course, not limited to
`erythrocytes. We have recently found that synthetic glycolipids
`of the kind discussed here can be functionally incorporated into
`such diverse cells as embryonic skeletal muscle cells and liver
`hepatocytes. Furthermore, the use of water-soluble spacer
`groups should allow the determination of the minimal distance
`a sugar (or other receptor) must be from the membrane before
`it becomes a functional receptor. This dimension of the mem-
`brane is not obtainable by electron microscopy, and its deter'
`mination should be of interest for a molecular understanding
`of what terms such as crypticity mean when applied to recep-
`tors.
`
`This work was supported by Department of Energy Contract DE-
`AC02-79EV10268 and partially by National Science Foundation Grant
`PCM 77-23588. R.R.R. is the recipient of National Institutes of Health
`Research Career Development Award GM 00014; J.S. is the recipient
`of National Institutes of Health Postdoctoral Fellowship Al 05752.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`Hughes, R. C. (1976) Membrane Glycoproteins (Butterworth,
`London).
`Orr, G. A. & Rando, R. R. (1978) Nature (London) 272, 722-
`725.
`Rando, R. R., Orr, G. A. & Bangerter, F. W. (1979) J. Biol. Chem.
`254,8318-8323.
`Orr, G. A., Rando, R. R. & Bangerter, F. W. (1979) J. Biol. Chem.
`254,4721-4725.
`Rando, R. R. & Bangerter, F. W. (1979) J. Supramol. Struct. 11,
`295-309.
`Huang, C., Charlton, J. P., Shyr, C. I. & Thompson, T. E. (1970)
`Biochemistry 9, 3422-3426.
`Litman, B. J. (1973) Biochemistry 12, 2545-2554.
`Ames, B. M. & Dubin, D. T. (1960) J. Biol. Chem. 235, 769-
`775.
`Krantz, M. J. & Lee, Y. C. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 71, 318-
`321.
`Barenholz, Y., Gibbes, D., Litman, B. J., Goll, J., Thompson, T.
`E. & Carlson, F. D. (1977) Biochemistry 16,2806-2810.
`Bruckdorfer, K. R. & Graham, J. M. (1976) in Biological Mem-
`branes, eds. Chapman, D. & Wallach, D. F. H. (Academic, New
`York), Vol. 3, pp. 103-152.
`
`B
`
`**.
`
`gQv
`
`Aggregating cells: 1 ml of bovine erythrocytes (5 X 108
`FIG. 4.
`cells) in phosphate-buffered saline was modified with liposomes
`containing 5% II (n = 2) as in Table 1. Aliquots (0.1 ml) of the cells
`were placed in three test tubes: (A) control; (B) Con A (50,g/ml) was
`added; (C) 40 mM a-methyl mannoside was added followed by Con
`A (50,ug/ml). The cells were incubated for 10 min at room tempera-
`ture; aliquots were removed and examined by light microscopy with
`bright-field objectives at a magnification of X125. When a-methyl
`mannoside was added to agglutinated cells, the aggregates were dis-
`persed (not shown).
`
`same extent into the erythrocyte. Therefore, the differences
`observed here cannot be due to differential incorporation of the
`glycolipid. Further increases beyond 26 A do not appear to
`enhance the aggregation response. When the hydrophobic
`spacer groups were used (I), no aggregation of the cells occurred
`in the presence of Con A, supporting our contention that hy-
`drophilic spacer groups are- required. Under conditions where
`cells modified with II (n = 2) were aggregated with 4 ,ug of Con
`A per ml, 9.15 X 106 sites per cell were introduced and the av-
`erage density of sites equaled 8.4 X 104 sites per 'm2. Com-
`paring this value with that obtained by the chemical method
`for the incorporation of sugar residues onto the cell surface, we
`found that when 7.1 X 106 a-mannosyl residues were incor-
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1043 PAGE 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket