throbber
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 54 (2002) 453–456
`
`www.elsevier.com / locate / drugdeliv
`
`Preface
`I ntroduction and overview of peptide and protein pegylation
`
`I ntroduction
`
`It has long been a dream in medicine and phar-
`macy to use peptides and proteins as drugs. The
`driving force for this interest is the ability of these
`compounds to eliminate toxic or overproduced com-
`pounds in the body and to mimic endogenous
`hormones, cytokines and antibodies. Two major
`hurdles were apparent. First, there was the difficulty
`in obtaining sufficient quantities of the materials.
`Small peptides could be made by chemical synthesis,
`but
`larger molecules could only be obtained by
`laborious extraction and purification from natural
`sources. This problem has been overcome by the
`development of genetic engineering, so that now it is
`routine to prepare kilogram quantities of pure pro-
`teins. The second major hurdle, and one that remains
`a serious challenge, is to deliver the molecules to the
`desired bodily target. Oral delivery of proteins
`remains unavailable because proteins are routinely
`destroyed by the digestive system. Even injected
`proteins generally have poor pharmacokinetics be-
`cause of rapid renal excretion and proteolytic diges-
`tion. There can also be significant immunological
`reactions. Finally, proteins are difficult to formulate
`because of their intrinsic instability.
`Many approaches to enhancing protein delivery
`have been examined, including protein entrapment in
`insoluble matrices [1] and liposomes [2] and im-
`mobilization onto polymer resins for use with ex-
`tracorporeal shunts through which blood could flow
`[3]. By far the most successful approach has been to
`mask the protein surface by covalent coupling of
`soluble poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) or, as it has
`become known, ‘‘pegylation’’.
`
`literature is available on
`A large amount of
`pegylation, including several books and reviews [1–
`10]. The prime purpose of the present volume is to
`present, for the first time, a review of the extensive
`human and animal data that have recently become
`available on pegylated proteins and peptides. Previ-
`ous reviews have focused on chemistry for pegyla-
`tion and on in vitro examination of pegylated
`molecules. Until recently only two proteins, PEG-
`asparaginase and PEG-adenosine deaminase, had
`been approved for human use, and little clinical
`information was available on other pegylated mole-
`cules. However,
`the past few years have seen a
`dramatic expansion of clinical trials, and applications
`for approval as drugs have been filed for two PEG-
`proteins (PEG-granulocyte colony stimulating factor
`from Amgen and PEG-human growth hormone
`antagonist
`from Pharmacia). Also two pegylated
`molecules with major commercial potential have
`been approved (PEG-alpha interferon 2b, Schering
`Plough’s PEG-Intron , and PEG-alpha-interferon 2a,
`Hoffman-La Roche’s Pegasys ). Results from these
`studies have revealed tremendously valuable infor-
`mation on strengths and weaknesses of pegylation,
`and it is clear that pegylation is well on its way to
`becoming a standard component of the pharmaceu-
`tical tool box.
`
`H istorical background
`
`The pioneering first steps in pegylation were taken
`in late 1970s in the laboratory of Professor Frank
`Davis of Rutgers University, and the Commentary in
`this volume is a reminiscence of these early days
`
`0169-409X / 02 / $ – see front matter
`P I I : S 0 1 6 9 - 4 0 9 X ( 0 2 ) 0 0 0 2 0 - 0
`
`2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 1
`
`(cid:210)
`(cid:210)
`(cid:211)
`

`

`454
`
`Preface
`
`written by Davis. It is important to remember that
`the technique of coupling polymers to proteins was
`originated in the 1950s and 1960s with investigations
`of protein structure and function by site-directed
`chemical modification. These studies led to so-called
`‘‘gentle chemistry’’ for protein manipulation. Im-
`portant also were discoveries made in the 1970s that
`enzymes could be covalently linked to insoluble
`matrices for biocatalytic applications. From such
`studies we came to understand that the delicate and
`complex protein molecules, under appropriate con-
`ditions, could be treated as a common chemical
`entity.
`Other soluble polymers, including polysaccharides
`[11] and albumin [12], have been used for protein
`conjugation, primarily to stabilize proteins toward
`proteolysis and to increase residence time in the
`body. One product, dextran-streptokinase, has been
`marketed in Russia for thrombolytic therapy [13].
`However, it was the development of pegylation that
`provided the real breakthrough in enhancing the
`pharmaceutical properties of proteins and peptides.
`PEG possesses a unique set of properties, including
`absence of toxicity, immunogenicity and antigenici-
`ty; low, mass-dependent elimination via the kidney;
`high flexibility and high solubility in water and
`certain organic media. In turn, PEG-proteins possess
`reduced toxicity, immunogenicity and antigenicity,
`reduced rates of kidney clearance and proteolysis,
`and enhanced solubility and stability. Valuable im-
`provements in various pharmacokinetic kinetics pa-
`rameters (e.g., absorption rate and volume of dis-
`tribution) are also seen. Details of these various
`properties are provided in the reviews we have
`referenced and in the following sections.
`It is interesting that it has taken over 20 years for
`protein pegylation to approach becoming a standard
`technique. In part this was due to the time required
`to improve protein manufacturing, but also it has
`been necessary for the organic and polymer chemis-
`try of PEG activation to mature. Of course there has
`been tremendous advancement as well in understand-
`ing of protein structure and properties and of the
`effects of pegylation. Quite probably, various market
`forces have also played a role in slow adoption of the
`technology, as with any revolutionary new technolo-
`gy.
`
`A rticles in this issue (Parts One and Two)
`
`The seventeen chapters of these two issues of
`ADDR will review many major achievements of
`pegylation. As mentioned above, the Commentary in
`this first volume is a review by Davis of
`the
`discovery of pegylation and its benefits. It is indeed
`fascinating to read this first-hand accounting of the
`creative and the mundane forces that led to such an
`important invention. We see the professor’s eternal
`pursuit for funding, the delight and value of old-
`fashioned library detective work, the light-bulb flash
`of a good idea, the juxtaposition of the idea with
`protein availability and just
`the right polymer
`catalogue, and finally appreciation of unexpected
`laboratory results. We suspect it is just this type of
`experience that keeps most of us in science. Admit-
`tedly, however, Davis’ work has had far greater
`impact than most.
`The first chapter by Roberts and co-workers
`reviews the contributions from many different re-
`search groups on improving conjugation chemistry,
`analytical methods for conjugate characterization,
`and the influence of mass and shape of the polymer
`on conjugate properties.
`The second chapter by Kinstler and co-workers
`teaches how PEG may be specifically linked to the
`amine terminus of a protein. As noted here, site-
`specific conjugation chemistries are a critical need in
`protein pegylation because of the many isomers that
`can result from non-specific chemistries. Two im-
`portant applications of this chemistry to therapeu-
`tically useful proteins are reported also. The problem
`of specificity of conjugation is also faced by Sato in
`Chapter 3 where conjugation to glutamine residues is
`described.
`Hinds and Kim report specific conjugation of PEG
`to two of the three amino groups of insulin in
`Chapter 4. PEGs of low mass were shown in this
`work not to alter the conformation or activity of the
`hormone, but
`they did eliminate immunogenicity,
`antigenicity and allergenicity and lengthen circula-
`tion lifetime.
`In Chapter 5 Chapman and co-workers discuss
`results obtained in the pegylation of antibody frag-
`ments. Antibodies have remarkable potential as
`drugs, but their high production cost is a serious
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Preface
`
`455
`
`barrier to commercial application. Antibody frag-
`ments are much less costly to manufacture, but their
`circulation life times in the body are quite short. The
`half-life problem can be solved by pegylation. Chap-
`man and co-workers describe this approach and show
`that PEG–antibody fragment conjugates have great
`therapeutic potential.
`The next two chapters present pivotal papers from
`groups at Schering-Plough and Hoffman-La Roche
`and Shearwater on pegylation of alpha-interferon.
`The scientific community is fortunate to receive
`these important papers on two very important com-
`(cid:210) (cid:210)
`mercial products (Pegasys
`and PEG-Intron ). This
`kind of
`information is frequently not published.
`These papers reveal chemical and clinical results for
`pegylated proteins
`in unprecedented detail. We
`believe the information will be used for years to
`design new PEG-protein pharmaceuticals. The
`pegylated alpha-interferons have been approved for
`treatment of hepatitis-C, a disease of great societal
`importance, and they are under investigation for
`other important indications.
`The last chapter by Veronese and colleagues
`reviews
`the hundreds of
`laboratory studies of
`superoxide dismutase pegylation. This enzyme is
`involved in many pathological states, and it would
`seem reasonable to expect commercial development,
`but this has not occurred, and one is left to wonder
`why. Nonetheless these works have served as a
`proving ground for new chemical methods of PEG
`coupling and new analytical procedures for conjugate
`characterization, and they illustrate the influence of
`PEG molecular weight on clearance and activity.
`The ADDR issue following this one will report
`nine additional reviews regarding other products,
`including pegylated asparaginase, growth hormone
`releasing factor, growth hormone antagonist, tumor
`necrosis factor, a TPO-mimetic and staphylokinase,
`and a chapter on pharmacokinetic and immunologi-
`cal properties of conjugates.
`
`C onclusions
`
`In summary, protein pegylation has come a long
`way toward becoming a standard tool for the phar-
`maceutical sciences. We believe these volumes will
`
`the scientific community in applying the
`assist
`knowledge that is now available.
`
`Francesco M. Veronese
`(Theme Editor)
`
`Department of Pharmaceutical Science
`University of Padova
`Via Marzoilo 5
`Padova 35128, Italy
`E-mail: francesco.veronese@unipd.it
`
`J. Milton Harris
`(Theme Editor)
`
`Shearwater Corporation
`490 Discovery Drive
`Huntsville, AL 35806, USA
`E-mail: jmharris@shearwatercorp.com
`
`R eferences
`
`(Ed.), Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Chemistry,
`[1] J.M. Harris
`Biotechnical and Biomedical Applications, Plenum Press,
`New York, 1992.
`[2] J.M. Harris, S. Zalipsky (Eds.), Poly(Ethylene Glycol)
`Chemistry and Biological Applications, ACS Symposium
`Series No. 680, American Chemical Society, Washington,
`DC, 1997.
`[3] F.F. Davis, G.M. Kazo, M.L. Nucci, A. Abuchowski,
`Reduction of immunogenicity and extension of circulating
`half-life of peptide and protein, in: V.H.L. Lee (Ed.), Peptide
`and Protein Drug Delivery, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1990.
`[4] M.L. Nucci, R. Schorr, A. Abuchowski, The therapeutic
`value of poly(ethylene glycol) modified protein, Adv. Drug
`Deliv. Rev. 6 (1991) 133–151.
`[5] C. Delgado, G.E. Francis, D. Fisher, The uses and properties
`of PEG-linked proteins, Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier
`Systems 9 (1992) 249–304.
`[6] N.V. Katre, The conjugation of proteins with poly(ethylene
`glycol)and other polymers. Altering properties of proteins to
`enhance their therapeutic potential, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
`10 (1993) 91–114.
`[7] Y. Inada, M. Furukawa, H. Sasaki, Y. Kodera, M. Hiroto, H.
`Nischimura, A. Matsushima, Biomedical and biotechnologi-
`cal application of PEG and PEG-modified proteins, Tibtech
`13 (1995) 86–91.
`[8] C. Monfardini, F.M. Veronese, Stabilization of substances in
`the circulation, Bioconj. Chem. 9 (1998) 418–450.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`456
`
`Preface
`
`[9] P. Bailon, W. Berthold, Polyethylene glycol-conjugated phar-
`maceutical proteins, Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today (PSTT)
`(1998) 352–356.
`[10] F.M. Veronese, Peptide and protein PEGylation: a review of
`problems and solutions, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 405–417.
`[11] R.G. Melton, C.N. Wiblin, R.F. Sherwood, Covalent linkage
`of carboxypeptidase to soluble dextran. Properties of conju-
`gates and effects on plasma persistence in mice, Biochem.
`Pharmacol. 36 (1987) 105–112.
`
`[12] K. Wong, L.G. Cleland, M.J. Poznanski, Enhanced anti-
`inflammatory effects and reduced immunogenicity of bovine
`liver superoxide dismutase by conjugation with homologous
`albumin, Agent Action 10 (1980) 231–239.
`[13] V.P. Torchilin, J.I. Voronkov, A.V. Mazoev, The use of
`immobilised streptokinase (Strptodekaza) for the therapy of
`thromboses, Ther. Arch. 54 (1982) 21–28.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1029 PAGE 4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket