throbber
Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`O RIG IN AL R ES EA RC H
`Mini-PEG spacering of VAP-1-targeting
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 peptide improves PET imaging
`of inflammation
`Anu Autio1, Tiina Henttinen2, Henri J Sipilä1, Sirpa Jalkanen3 and Anne Roivainen1,4*
`
`Open Access
`
`Abstract
`
`Background: Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is an adhesion molecule that plays a key role in recruiting
`leucocytes into sites of inflammation. We have previously shown that 68Gallium-labelled VAP-1-targeting peptide
`(68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1) is a positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agent, capable of visualising inflammation in
`rats, but disadvantaged by its short metabolic half-life and rapid clearance. We hypothesised that prolonging the
`metabolic half-life of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 could further improve its imaging characteristics. In this study, we
`evaluated a new analogue of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 modified with a mini-polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacer (68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-PEG-P1) for in vivo imaging of inflammation.
`Methods: Whole-body distribution kinetics and visualisation of inflammation in a rat model by the peptides 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were evaluated in vivo by dynamic PET imaging and ex vivo by measuring
`the radioactivity of excised tissues. In addition, plasma samples were analysed by radio-HPLC for the in vivo stability
`of the peptides.
`Results: The peptide with the mini-PEG spacer showed slower renal excretion but similar liver uptake as the
`original peptide. At 60 min after injection, the standardised uptake value of the inflammation site was 0.33 ± 0.07
`for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 0.53 ± 0.01 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 by PET. In addition, inflammation-to-muscle ratios
`were 6.7 ± 1.3 and 7.3 ± 2.1 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1, respectively. The proportion of
`unchanged peptide in circulation at 60 min after injection was significantly higher for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 (76%)
`than for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 (19%).
`Conclusion: The eight-carbon mini-PEG spacer prolonged the metabolic half-life of the 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 peptide,
`leading to higher target-to-background ratios and improved in vivo PET imaging of inflammation.
`Keywords: gallium-68, inflammation imaging, mini-PEG spacer, positron emission tomography, vascular adhesion
`protein-1
`
`Background
`In vivo imaging of inflammation is a demanding task,
`and novel molecular imaging targets are called for. The
`gold standard in nuclear medicine is the radiolabelling
`of white blood cells, which is both time consuming and
`potentially hazardous for the technical personnel.
`Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) is an inflamma-
`tion-inducible endothelial adhesion protein involved in
`
`* Correspondence: anne.roivainen@utu.fi
`1Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku,
`Finland
`Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
`
`the leucocyte trafficking from the blood stream into the
`tissues. VAP-1 is stored in intracellular granules within
`endothelial cells. However, upon inflammation, it is
`rapidly translocated to the endothelial cell surface, for
`example, in the synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis
`and at the site of ischemic reperfusion injury [1,2].
`Therefore, VAP-1 is both an optimal candidate for anti-
`inflammatory therapy and a potential target for in vivo
`imaging of inflammation. This approach may open new
`opportunities for diagnosing, therapy planning and mon-
`itoring of the treatment efficacy, as well as for the drug
`discovery and development processes [3-6].
`
`© 2011 Autio et al; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
`License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
`provided the original work is properly cited.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 2 of 7
`
`Peptide-based imaging agents are small molecules that
`possess favourable properties such as rapid diffusion in
`target tissue, rapid clearance from the blood circulation
`and non-target tissues, easy and low-cost synthesis, and
`low toxicity and immunogenicity. We are particularly
`interested in developing radiolabelled peptides for VAP-
`1 targeting for the purposes of in vivo imaging of leuco-
`cyte trafficking. The linear peptide, VAP-P1, has been
`characterised by Yegutkin et al. and proven to bind the
`enzymatic groove of VAP-1 and dose-dependently inhi-
`bit VAP-1-dependent lymphocyte rolling and firm adhe-
`sion to primary endothelial cells [7]. We have previously
`shown that 68Ga-labelled DOTA-conjugated VAP-P1
`peptide (68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1) is able to delineate
`inflammation in rats by a VAP-1-specific way using
`positron emission tomography (PET) [8-10]. Disadvanta-
`geously, the 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 peptide has relatively
`short plasma half-life and very rapid clearance by the
`kidneys to the urine.
`PEGylation, the process by which polyethylene glycol
`(PEG) chains or its derivatives, e.g., mini-PEGs are
`attached to a peptide, has been used for modifying the
`properties of radiolabelled compounds, such as antibo-
`dies and peptides, in order to improve their imaging
`characteristics. The goal of PEGylation is mainly to
`improve the tracer’s kinetics and distribution pattern by
`increasing its metabolic half-life and by lowering its
`non-specific binding. By increasing the molecular mass
`of the peptide and by shielding it from proteolytic
`enzymes, PEGylation may modify its biodistribution and
`pharmacokinetics [11]. Thus, the method could over-
`come the above mentioned shortcomings. However,
`because PEGylation may also have unfavourable effects,
`such as inhibition of receptor binding and reduction of
`target-to-background ratio, its impact must be carefully
`evaluated for a new peptide.
`We hypothesised that prolonging the metabolic half-
`life of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 would further improve its
`potential for in vivo imaging of inflammation. In this
`study, we evaluated a new mini-PEG spacered analogue
`of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 (68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1) for
`in vivo PET imaging of inflammation.
`
`Methods
`68Ga-DOTA-peptides
`The DOTA-conjugated peptides were purchased from
`Almac Sciences (By Gladsmuir, Scotland, UK), ABX
`advanced biochemical compounds GmbH (Radeberg,
`Germany) and NeoMPS (Strasbourg, France).
`Linear 9-amino acid DOTA-chelated peptide
`(GGGGKGGGG) with and without a PEG linker (8-
`amino-3,6-diooxaoctanoyl, PEG derivative, MW 145.16
`Da) between the DOTA and the N terminal amino acid
`was labelled with 68Ga as previously described [8], and
`
`named as 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`PEG-P1. Briefly, 68Ga was obtained in the form of
`68GaCl3 from a 68Ge/68Ga generator (Cyclotron Co.,
`Obninsk, Russia) by elution with 0.1 M HCl. The
`68GaCl3 eluate (500 μl) was mixed with sodium acetate
`(18 mg; Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany) to give a pH
`of approximately 5.5. Then, DOTA-peptide (35 nmol)
`was added and the mixture was incubated at 100°C for
`20 min. No further purification was needed.
`The radiochemical purity was determined by reversed-
`phase HPLC (μBondapak C18, 7.8 × 300 mm2, 125 Å,
`10 μm; Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The
`HPLC conditions for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 have been
`described previously [9]. The HPLC conditions for 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were slightly different and as fol-
`lows: flow rate = 4 ml/min, l = 215 nm, A = 2.5 mM
`trifluoroacetic acid, B = acetonitrile and C = 50 mM
`phosphoric acid. Linear A/B/C gradient was 100/0/0 for
`0 to 3 min, 40/60/0 for 3 to 9 min, and 0/0/100 for 9 to
`16 min. The radio-HPLC system consisted of LaChrom
`instruments (Hitachi; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany):
`pump L7100, UV detector L-7400 and interface D-7000;
`an on-line radioisotope detector (Radiomatic 150 TR,
`Packard, Meriden, CT, USA); and a computerised data
`acquisition system.
`
`In vitro stability and solubility
`The in vitro stability of the 68Ga-labelled peptides was
`evaluated in human and rat plasma. Several samples
`were taken during the 4-h incubation period at 37°C.
`Proteins from plasma samples were precipitated with
`10% sulphosalicylic acid (1:1 v/v), centrifuged at 3,900 ×
`g for 3 min at 4°C, and filtered through 0.45-μm Minis-
`pike filter (Waters Corporation). The filtrate was ana-
`lysed by radio-HPLC.
`The octanol-water distribution coefficient, logD, of
`the 68Ga-DOTA-peptides was determined using the
`following procedure. Approximately 5 kBq of 68Ga-
`labelled peptide in 500 μl of phosphate-buffered saline
`(PBS, pH 7.4) was added to 500 μl of 1-octanol. After
`the mixture had been vortexed for 3 min, it was centri-
`fuged at 12,000 × g for 6 min, and 100-μl aliquots of
`both layers were counted in a gamma counter (1480
`Wizard 3″ Gamma Counter; EG&G Wallac, Turku,
`Finland). The test was repeated three times. The logD
`was calculated as = log10 (counts in octanol/counts in
`PBS).
`
`Animals
`All animal experiments were approved by the Lab-Ani-
`mal Care & Use Committee of the State Provincial
`Office of Southern Finland and carried out in compli-
`ance with the Finnish laws relating to the conduct of
`animal experimentation.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 3 of 7
`
`Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 14) were purchased
`from Harlan, Horst, The Netherlands. Twenty-four
`hours before the PET studies, turpentine oil (Sigma-
`Aldrich; 0.05 ml per rat) was injected subcutaneously
`into their neck area in order to induce a sterile inflam-
`mation [10]. Six rats were PET imaged and additional
`eight animals were used for in vivo metabolite analyses.
`
`PET imaging and ex vivo biodistribution
`The whole-body distribution and kinetics of 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1 (n = 3) and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 (n
`= 3) in rats harbouring a sterile inflammation were stu-
`died with a high-resolution research tomograph (Sie-
`mens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). The rats
`were anaesthetised with isoflurane (induction 3%, main-
`tenance 2.2%). Two rats were imaged at the same time,
`and they were kept on a warm pallet during the imaging
`procedure. Following a 6-min transmission for attenua-
`tion correction, the rats were intravenously (i.v.) injected
`with 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 (15.8 ± 3.0 MBq, 19.4 ± 0.0
`μg, 19.6 ± 0.0 nmol) or with 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1
`(17.7 ± 1.6 MBq, 21.0 ± 1.3 μg, 18.5 ± 1.1 nmol) as a
`bolus via a tail vein using a 24-gauge cannula (BD Neo-
`flon, Becton Dickinson Infusion Therapy AB, Helsing-
`borg, Sweden). Dynamic imaging lasting for 60 min
`started at the time of injection. The data acquired in list
`mode were iteratively reconstructed with a 3-D ordered
`subsets expectation maximisation algorithm with 8 itera-
`tions, 16 subsets and a 2-mm full-width at half-maxi-
`mum post-filter into 5 × 60 s and 11 × 300 s frames.
`Quantitative analyses were performed by drawing
`regions of interest (ROI) on the inflammatory foci, mus-
`cle (hind leg), heart, kidney, liver and urinary bladder.
`Time-activity curves (TACs) were extracted from the
`corresponding dynamic images (Vinci software, version
`2.37; Max Planck Institute for Neurological Research,
`Cologne, Germany). The average radioactivity concen-
`trations in the ROIs (kilobecquerels per millilitre) were
`used for further analyses. The uptake was reported as
`standardised uptake value (SUV), which was calculated
`as the radioactivity of the ROI divided by the relative
`injected radioactivity expressed per animal body weight.
`The radioactivity remaining in the tail was compensated.
`After the PET imaging, the animals were sacrificed.
`Samples of blood, urine and various organs were col-
`lected, weighed and measured for radioactivity using the
`gamma counter (Wizard, EG&G Wallac). The results
`were expressed as SUVs.
`
`Blood analyses
`Blood samples (0.2 ml of each) were drawn at 5, 10, 15,
`30, 45, 60 and 120 min after injection of 68Ga-DOTA-
`peptides into heparinised tubes (Microvette 100; Sar-
`stedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Radioactivity of whole
`
`blood was measured with the gamma counter (Wizard,
`EG&G Wallac). Plasma was separated by centrifugation
`(2,200 × g for 5 min at 4°C), and plasma radioactivity
`was measured. The ratio of radioactivity in blood versus
`plasma was calculated. To determine plasma protein
`binding, proteins were precipitated with 10% sulphosa-
`licylic acid, and the radioactivity in protein precipitate
`and supernatant was measured. The plasma supernatant
`was further analysed by radio-HPLC in order to evaluate
`the in vivo stability of the 68Ga-labelled peptides.
`In vivo stability data were used in order to generate
`metabolite-corrected plasma TACs for 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1, which were
`further used for the calculation of pharmacokinetic
`parameters. The area under curve (AUC) of the plasma
`TAC from 0 to infinity was calculated using a non-com-
`partmental analysis employing the trapezoidal rule. The
`clearance (CL) of the 68Ga-labelled peptides after a sin-
`gle intravenous bolus dose was calculated by dividing
`the injected dose by the AUC. The plot of the natural
`logarithm of parent tracer concentration against time
`after bolus injection became linear in the end phase, as
`the tracer was eliminated according to the laws of first-
`order reaction kinetics. The elimination rate constant
`(kel) was calculated as the negative slope of the linear
`part of the plot. The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2)
`was calculated as t1/2 = ln(2)/kel. The metabolic half-
`lives of the 68Ga-DOTA-peptides were calculated
`according to the results of radio-HPLC, i.e. the time
`point when 50% of the total radioactivity is still bound
`to the intact peptide.
`
`Statistical analyses
`All the results are expressed as means ± standard devia-
`tion (SD) and range. The correlations between PET ima-
`ging and ex vivo measurement values were evaluated
`using linear regression analysis. Inter-group comparisons
`were made using an unpaired t test. Statistical analyses
`were conducted using Origin 7.5 software (Microcal,
`Northampton, MA, USA). A P value less than 0.05 was
`considered as statistically significant.
`
`Results
`In vitro studies
`The radiochemical purities of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were 97 ± 1% and 99 ± 1%,
`and specific radioactivities 2.27 ± 0.47 and 2.55 ± 0.45
`MBq/nmol, respectively. The retention times for 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were 6.6
`± 0.1 and 6.7 ± 0.1 min, respectively. The retention time
`for free gallium was approximately 12 min, and it eluted
`only with phosphoric acid. The in vitro stabilities of
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were
`very similar. The amounts of unchanged peptide after
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 4 of 7
`
`the 4-h incubation in human or rat plasma were 88 ±
`3% and 82 ± 11% for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 89 ± 8%
`and 90 ± 6% for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1, respectively.
`Both peptides were highly hydrophilic; logD was -3.30
`for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and -3.50 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`PEG-P1.
`
`PET studies with rat model of inflammation
`Both peptides were capable of visualising inflammatory
`foci from surrounding tissues by PET imaging (Figure
`1a). The inflammation uptakes expressed as SUVs were
`0.33 ± 0.07 (range, 0.26 to 0.40) and 0.53 ± 0.01 (range,
`0.42 to 0.60) for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-PEG-P1, respectively, at 60 min after injection.
`Inflammation-to-muscle ratios at 60 min after injection
`were 6.7 ± 1.3 (range, 5.2 to 7.5) and 7.3 ± 2.1 (range,
`5.6 to 9.7) for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-PEG-P1, respectively. The kinetics of 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 in inflammatory
`foci were quite fast, and the peak radioactivity was
`reached within 20 min for both peptides. On the aver-
`age, the inflammation uptake of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-
`P1 was 59% higher than that of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1,
`and the difference was statistically significant (P =
`0.047). According to the whole-body dynamic PET ima-
`ging, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 showed slower renal
`excretion to urine but otherwise rather
`similar
`
`distribution kinetics as the original peptide 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-P1 (Figure 1b, c, d, e).
`The PET imaging results were verified by ex vivo mea-
`surements (Figure 2). Linear regression analysis showed
`reasonable correlation between in vivo PET and ex vivo
`tissue samples (R = 0.58, P = 0.023 for 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-P1 and R = 0.80, P < 0.001 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`PEG-P1). When the tissue uptakes of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 were compared, the
`inflammation, lung, small intestine, skin and urinary
`bladder radioactivities were significantly different.
`Although the PET and ex vivo methods correlate well,
`there are some discrepancies between the results. For
`example, in the PET image analysis, the urine and blood
`of kidney are included in the “kidney” ROI, whereas for
`ex vivo measurement, the excised tissue samples are
`dotted dry on a paper. Since the radioactivity of urine is
`extremely high, the in vivo kidney SUV is higher than
`that of ex vivo.
`The blood-plasma ratios and the plasma free fractions
`(fp), i.e. the fraction of total radioactivity in plasma that
`is unbound to plasma proteins, were 1.3 ± 0.1 and 0.84
`± 0.04 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 1.3 ± 0.1 and 0.86 ±
`0.02 for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1, respectively. The in
`vivo stability of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 was better
`than that of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1. The proportions of
`unchanged peptides in rat plasma at 60 and 120 min
`
`Figure 1 PET images and time-activity curves. (a) Representative coronal PET images of Sprague-Dawley rats with sterile turpentine oil-
`induced inflammation as a sum image of 10 to 60 min after i.v. injection of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 (13.8 MBq) or 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 (17.5 MBq).
`Time-activity curves of (b) inflammation and muscle, (c) kidney, (d) liver and (e) urinary bladder for 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-
`P1.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 5 of 7
`
`Figure 2 Biodistribution of the 68Ga-DOTA-peptides at 60 min after injection. Results are given as the mean ± SD of three experiments.
`Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the peptides. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
`
`after injection were 19 ± 4% and 4 ± 1% for 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1 and 76 ± 18% and 49 ± 6% for 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-PEG-P1, respectively (Figure 3). The meta-
`bolic half-lives of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 and 68Ga-DOTA-
`VAP-PEG-P1 were 24 and 125 min, respectively. Based
`on in vivo plasma measurements, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`PEG-P1 showed significantly slower kel and total CL and
`larger AUC values. In addition, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-
`P1 had a longer elimination t1/2 than the original 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1, although the difference was not statisti-
`cally significant (Table 1).
`
`Figure 3 In vivo stability of the i.v. administered 68Ga-DOTA-
`peptides in blood circulation of the rat. Results are given as the
`means of three to seven experiments. NS, not significant; **P < 0.01;
`***P < 0.001.
`
`Discussion
`Previously, we have reported the feasibility of the VAP-
`1-targeting peptide, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1, for PET ima-
`ging of inflammation in different rat models [8-10].
`However, as a limitation, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 is cleared
`very rapidly from circulation and its in vivo stability
`against degradation by enzymes is only moderate. In
`this study, we showed that the incorporation of a mini-
`PEG spacer in 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 enhanced its in vivo
`stability
`and
`improved
`the PET imaging
`of
`inflammation.
`The animal model used in our experiments involves
`turpentine oil injection-induced subcutaneous inflamma-
`tion as described previously [10]. In that study, we were
`able to show that the H & E staining of the inflamed
`site demonstrated infiltration of leucocytes and macro-
`phages at the site of inflammation. The abscess centre
`with few cells, including residual injected oil, exudates
`and cell debris, was surrounded by an abscess wall. The
`dermis also appeared to be inflamed. In the present
`study, inflammation was evaluated in every animal by
`visually observing the pale colour of inflamed subcuta-
`neous tissue. We performed in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo
`experiments to evaluate the VAP-1 targeting, inflamma-
`tion imaging efficacy and pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 in comparison to the original 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-P1. The incorporation of a mini-PEG spacer
`had no apparent effect on the in vitro properties of the
`VAP-1 binding peptide; both peptides were stable in
`plasma incubations and their solubility was very similar.
`However, when i.v. administered, 68Ga-DOTAVAP-
`PEG-P1 showed significantly longer metabolic and
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 5
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 6 of 7
`
`Table 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters of the VAP-1-targeting 68Ga-DOTA-peptides
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1
`Elimination t1/2 (min)
`13.4 ± 1.8
`28.0 ± 10.7
`0.05 ± 0.01
`0.02 ± 0.01
`kel (1/min)
`950 ± 170
`2,400 ± 68
`AUC (min*kBq/ml)
`0.017 ± 0.001
`0.008 ± 0.002
`CL (ml/min)
`kel, elimination rate constant; AUC, area under curve; CL, clearance; NS, not significant.
`
`P value
`NS (0.079)
`0.018
`0.022
`0.006
`
`elimination half-lives and slower total clearance com-
`pared to 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1. Furthermore, our results
`revealed that while both peptides were able to visualise
`experimental inflammation by PET imaging, 68Ga-
`DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 showed a higher inflammation-to-
`muscle ratio than the original 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1. As
`regards 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1, the results of this study
`are in line with our previous publications [8-10]. The
`renal excretion of 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1 was slower,
`resulting in a significantly lower urinary bladder radioac-
`tivity in comparison to 68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1. The liver
`uptake was rather high for both peptides, which is, at
`least in part, due to the high number of VAP-1 recep-
`tors in the sinusoidal endothelial cells in the liver [12].
`Some degradation products of 68Ga-DOTA-peptides,
`such as free 68Ga, also tend to accumulate in the liver
`[13]. Although modification with a mini-PEG spacer
`generally decreases liver uptake, the two peptides
`behaved quite similarly in our study, suggesting a VAP-
`1-specific binding in this tissue.
`PEGylation has widely been used for improving the in
`vivo kinetics of pharmaceuticals. However, the results of
`such modifications depend much on the nature of the lead
`compound and the choice of PEG linker [14-20]. In most
`cases, PEGylation of radiopeptides has advantageous
`effects, such as increased metabolic half-life, decreased
`kidney uptake, and improved targeting and subsequent
`improved targeting for high-quality imaging. However, dis-
`advantageous results have also been reported, e.g. the
`insertion of a long PEG chain may induce a higher liver
`uptake and reduce receptor binding [16].
`In this study, we incorporated an eight-carbon mini-
`PEG spacer between the DOTA and the VAP-P1 pep-
`tide in order to prolong its biological activity. The 8-
`amino-3,6-dioxaoctanoic acid contains the shortest ether
`structure possible of PEG with two ethylene oxide units.
`A similar spacer has previously been used in imaging
`agents by Burtea et al. [21], Ke et al. [22] and Silvola et
`al. [23].
`Modification with a mini-PEG spacer increased meta-
`bolic stability of VAP-1-targeting DOTA-peptide. In
`addition, it also improved in vivo imaging of inflamma-
`tion suggesting that PEGylation had other highly pro-
`nounced in vivo effects beyond modification of
`pharmacokinetics. Although the modification with a
`
`mini-PEG spacer increased the target-to-background
`ratio, the SUV values in the inflamed area were still very
`low. Thus,
`further improvement of
`the tracer is
`warranted.
`
`Conclusion
`The incorporation of a mini-PEG spacer enhanced the
`in vivo stability and pharmacokinetics of the VAP-1-tar-
`geting peptide, thus leading to higher target-to-back-
`ground ratios and improved in vivo PET imaging of
`experimental inflammation. 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P1
`warrants further investigations for its feasibility in PET
`imaging of inflammation.
`
`Abbreviations
`HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography; H & E, haematoxylin and
`eosin; MW, molecular weight; PEG, polyethylene glycol; PET, positron
`emission tomography; VAP-1, vascular adhesion protein-1.
`
`Acknowledgements
`The study was conducted within the Finnish Centre of Excellence in
`Molecular Imaging in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research supported by
`the Academy of Finland, the University of Turku, the Turku University
`Hospital and the Åbo Akademi University. The study was further supported
`by grants from the Turku University Hospital (EVO grants, A.R. and A.A) and
`from the Academy of Finland (grant no. 119048, A.R). Anu Autio is a PhD
`student supported by the Drug Discovery Graduate School. Erja Mäntysalo is
`thanked for excellent assistance with animal experiments.
`
`Author details
`1Turku PET Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku,
`Finland 2Department of Biology, Division of Genetics and Physiology,
`University of Turku, Turku, Finland 3MediCity Research Laboratory, University
`of Turku, Turku, Finland 4Turku Center for Disease Modeling, University of
`Turku, Turku, Finland
`
`Authors’ contributions
`AA participated in the design of the study, carried out the in vitro and in
`vivo PET studies and drafted the manuscript. TH participated in the design
`of the study and drafted the manuscript. HJS performed the labelling
`chemistry and participated in in vitro studies. AR and SJ conceived the study,
`participated in its design and coordination and critically revised the
`manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
`
`Competing interests
`The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
`
`Received: 11 May 2011 Accepted: 26 July 2011 Published: 26 July 2011
`
`References
`Salmi M, Jalkanen S: A 90-kilodalton endothelial cell molecule mediating
`1.
`lymphocyte binding in humans. Science 1992, 257:1407-1409.
`Jaakkola K, Jalkanen S, Kaunismäki K, Vänttinen E, Saukko P, Alanen K,
`Kallajoki M, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Salmi M: Vascular adhesion protein-1,
`
`2.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 6
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`Autio et al. EJNMMI Research 2011, 1:10
`http://www.ejnmmires.com/content/1/1/10
`
`Page 7 of 7
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`12.
`
`intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and P-selectin mediate leukocyte
`binding to ischemic heart in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 36:122-129.
`Smith DJ, Salmi M, Bono P, Hellman J, Leu T, Jalkanen S: Cloning of
`vascular adhesion protein 1 reveals a novel multifunctional adhesion
`molecule. J Exp Med 1998, 188:17-27.
`Salmi M, Jalkanen S: VAP-1: an adhesin and an enzyme. Trends Immunol
`2001, 22:211-216.
`Tohka S, Laukkanen M-L, Jalkanen S, Salmi M: Vascular adhesion protein 1
`(VAP-1) functions as a molecular brake during granulocyte rolling and
`mediates recruitment in vivo. FASEB J 2001, 15:373-382.
`Jalkanen S, Salmi M: VAP-1 and CD73, endothelial cell surface enzymes in
`leukocyte extravasation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008, 28:18-26.
`Yegutkin GG, Salminen T, Koskinen K, Kurtis C, McPherson MJ, Jalkanen S,
`Salmi M: A peptide inhibitor of vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1)
`blocks leukocyte-endothelium interactions under shear stress. Eur J
`Immunol 2004, 34:2276-2285.
`Lankinen P, Mäkinen TJ, Pöyhönen TA, Virsu P, Salomäki S, Hakanen AJ,
`Jalkanen S, Aro HT, Roivainen A: (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 PET imaging
`capable of demonstrating the phase of inflammation in healing bones
`and the progress of infection in osteomyelitic bones. Eur J Nucl Med Mol
`Imaging 2008, 35:352-364.
`Ujula T, Salomäki S, Virsu P, Lankinen P, Mäkinen TJ, Autio A, Yegutkin GG,
`Knuuti J, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A: Synthesis, 68Ga labeling and
`preliminary evaluation of DOTA peptide binding vascular adhesion
`protein-1: a potential PET imaging agent for diagnosing. osteomyelitis.
`Nucl Med Biol 2009, 36:631-641.
`10. Autio A, Ujula T, Luoto P, Salomäki S, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A: PET imaging
`of inflammation and adenocarcinoma xenografts using vascular
`adhesion protein 1 targeting peptide (68)Ga-DOTAVAP-P1: comparison
`with (18)F-FDG. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010, 37:1918-1925.
`11. Harris JM, Chess RB: Effect of pegylation on pharmaceuticals. Nat Rev
`Drug Discov 2002, 3:214-221.
`Lalor PF, Edwards S, McNab G, Salmi M, Jalkanen S, Adams D: Vascular
`adhesion protein-1 mediates adhesion and transmigration of
`lymphocytes on human hepatic endothelial cells. J Immunol 2002,
`169:983-992.
`13. Ujula T, Salomäki S, Autio A, Luoto P, Tolvanen T, Lehikoinen P, Viljanen T,
`Sipilä H, Härkönen P, Roivainen A: 68Ga-chloride PET reveals human
`pancreatic adenocarcinoma xenografts in rats–comparison with FDG.
`Mol Imaging Biol 2010, 12:259-268.
`14. Chen X, Hou Y, Tohme M, Park R, Khankaldyyan V, Gonzales-Gomez I,
`Bading JR, Laug WE, Conti PS: Pegylated Arg-Gly-Asp peptide: 64Cu
`labeling and PET imaging of brain tumor alphavbeta3-integrin
`expression. J Nucl Med 2004, 45:1776-1783.
`15. Wen X, Wu Q, Ke S, Ellis L, Charnsangavej C, Delpassand AS, Wallace S, Li C:
`Conjugation with (111)In-DTPA-poly(ethylene glycol) improves imaging
`of anti-EGF receptor antibody C225. J Nucl Med 2001, 42:1530-1537.
`16. DeNardo SJ, Liu R, Albrecht H, Natarajan A, Sutcliffe JL, Anderson C, Peng L,
`Ferdani R, Cherry SR, Lam KS: 111In-LLP2A-DOTA polyethylene glycol-
`targeting a4b1 integrin: comparative pharmacokinetics for imaging and
`therapy of lymphoid malignancies. J Nucl Med 2009, 50:625-634.
`17. Wu Z, Li ZB, Cai W, He L, Chin FT, Li F, Chen X: 18F-labeled mini-PEG
`spacered RGD dimer (18F-FPRGD2): synthesis and microPET imaging of
`αvβ3 integrin expression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007, 34:1823-1831.
`Liu Z, Niu G, Shi J, Liu S, Wang F, Liu S, Chen X: 68Ga-labeled cyclic RGD
`dimers with Gly3 and PEG4 linkers: promising agents for tumor integrin
`αvβ3 PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009, 36:947-957.
`Liu Z, Liu S, Wang F, Liu S, Chen X: Noninvasive imaging of tumor
`integrin expression using 18F-labeled RGD dimer peptide with PEG4
`linkers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009, 36:1296-1307.
`Ke S, Wen X, Wu QP, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C, Stachowiak AM,
`Stephens CL, Abbruzzese JL, Podoloff DA, Li C: Imaging taxane-induced
`tumor apoptosis using PEGylated, 111In-labeled annexin V. J Nucl Med
`2004, 45:108-115.
`21. Burtea C, Laurent S, Lancelot E, Ballet S, Murariu O, Rousseaux O, Port M,
`Vander Elst L, Corot C, Muller RN: Peptidic targeting of phosphatidylserine
`for the MRI detection of apoptosis in atherosclerotic plaques. Mol Pharm
`2009, 6:1903-1919.
`Ke T, Jeong EK, Wang X, Feng Y, Parker DL, Lu ZR: RGD targeted poly(l-
`glutamic acid)-cystamine-(Gd-DO3A) conjugate for detecting
`
`18.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`angiogenesis biomarker αvβ3 integrin with MRTI mapping. Int J
`Nanomedicine 2007, 2:191-199.
`Silvola J, Autio A, Luoto P, Jalkanen S, Roivainen A: Preliminary evaluation
`of novel 68Ga-DOTAVAP-PEG-P2 peptide targeting vascular adhesion
`protein-1. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2010, 30:75-78.
`
`doi:10.1186/2191-219X-1-10
`Cite this article as: Autio et al.: Mini-PEG spacering of VAP-1-targeting
`68Ga-DOTAVAP-P1 peptide improves PET imaging of inflammation.
`EJNMMI Research 2011 1:10.
`
`Submit your manuscript to a
`journal and benefi t from:
`7 Convenient online submission
`7 Rigorous peer review
`7 Immediate publication on acceptance
`7 Open access: articles freely available online
`7 High visibility within the fi eld
`7 Retaining the copyright to your article
`
` Submit your next manuscript at 7 springeropen.com
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 7
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1095 PAGE 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket