throbber
Pharmaceutical Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1998
`
`Research Paper
`
`Effects of Non-Covalent Self-
`Association on the Subcutaneous
`Absorption of a Therapeutic Peptide
`
`Dean K.Clodfelter,! Allen H. Pekar,! Dawn M.
`Rebhun,' Kevin A. Destrampe,! Henry A. Havel,
`Sharon R. Myers,” and Mark L. Brader!*
`
`Received July 31, 1997; accepted November 7, 1997
`
`Purpose. To utilize an acylated peptide as a model system to investi-
`gate the relationships among solution peptide conformation, non-
`covalent self-association, subcutaneous absorption and bioavailability
`under pharmaceutically relevant solution formulation conditions.
`Methods. CD spectroscopy, FTIR spectroscopy, equilibrium sedimen-
`tation, dynamic light scattering, and size exclusion chromatography
`were employedto characterize the effects of octanoylation on confor-
`mation and self-association of the 31 amino acid peptide derivative
`des-amino-histidine(7) arginine(26) human glucagon-like peptide
`(7-37)-OH (IP(7)R(26)GLP-1). Hyperglycemic clamp studies were
`performed to comparethe bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and phar-
`macodynamics of solution formulations of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`administered subcutaneously to normal dogs.
`Results. Octanoylation of IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 was shown to confer the
`propensity for a major solvent-induced conformational transition with an
`accompanying solvent- and temperature-dependent self-association
`behavior. Formulations were characterized that give rise to remarkably dif-
`ferent pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics that correlate with dis-
`tinct peptide conformational and self-association states. These states
`correspondto:(i) a minimally associated a-helical form (apparent molec-
`ular weight = 14 kDa),(ii) a highly associated, predominantly §-sheet form
`(effective molecular diameter 20 nm), and (iii) an unusually large, micelle-
`like soluble B-sheet aggregate (effective molecular diameter 50 nm).
`Conclusions. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of a self-associating
`peptide can be influenced by aggregatesize and the ease of disruption of
`the non-covalent intermolecular interactions at the subcutaneoussite.
`
`Hydrophobic aggregation mediated by seemingly innocuous solution
`formulation conditions can have a dramatic effect on the subcutaneous
`
`bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of a therapeutic peptide and in the
`extreme, can totally preclude its absorption. A size exclusion chromato-
`graphic methodis identified that distinguishes subcutaneously bioavail-
`able aggregated oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 from non-bioavailable aggregated
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1.
`
`KEY WORDS: peptide; aggregation; subcutaneous absorption;
`glucagon-like peptide-1.
`
` Biopharmaceutical Development, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli
`Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
`? Diabetes Research, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and
`Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
`> To whom correspondence should be addressed. (E-mail: brader_m_I
`@lilly.com)
`ABBREVIATIONS: Glucagon-like peptide-1(7-37)-OH (GLP-1);
`imidazopropionyl(7) arginine(26) lysine(34)-human glucagon-like
`peptide-1 (IP(7)R(26)GLP-1); imidazopropionyl(7) arginine(26) N°-
`octanoyl-lysine(34)-human glucagon-like peptide-1 (oct-IP(7)R(26)
`GLP-1); circular dichroism, CD; size exclusion chromatography,
`SEC; Fourier transform infrared, FTIR; phosphate buffered saline,
`PBS.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The efficacy of subcutaneously administered therapeutic
`proteins and peptides is critically dependent upon the absorp-
`tion and subsequent delivery of the biologically active form of
`the drugto thesite of action. The task of the formulation scien-
`tist includes conferring the appropriate shelf-life and in-use sta-
`bility as well as stabilizing the molecule in a form thatfacilitates
`optimal bioavailability and biopotency. The formulation design
`mayalso play the principal role in mediating drug absorption
`thus providing a means totailor appropriate pharmacokinetics
`for the drug. Currently, most biopharmaceuticals are adminis-
`tered via subcutaneousinjection or intravenous infusion. While
`the importance of chemical and physical stability are obvious,
`the potential pharmacological consequences of non-covalent
`solution structural phenomena suchas alternative molecular
`conformations and/or self-association may be a poorly appreci-
`ated but critical aspect of the overall therapeutic success of the
`drug. This is particularly relevant to discovery and early stage
`drug development where a large-scale screening strategy or
`an emphasis on speed-to-first-efficacy-dose may preclude a
`detailed solution characterization of the molecule prior to dos-
`ing (1). The non-covalent aggregation of protein pharmaceuti-
`cals is a well recognized problem that has been studied largely
`in the context of insoluble forms, including precipitates, fibrils,
`and gels (2,3). These insoluble products have been attributed to
`the formation of partially unfolded intermediates with an
`exposed hydrophobic region that drives the aggregation
`towards the pharmaceutically undesirable form (2-4). Previous
`studies of this mechanism have been performed by introducing
`a denaturant to generate the partially unfolded intermediate
`(4,5). By studying an acylated peptide we haveeffectively
`introducedan artificial hydrophobic regionto the surface of the
`peptide in the absence of a denaturant. This approach hasfacil-
`itated an investigation of the relationship between hydrophobic
`aggregation and subcutaneous bioavailability under pharma-
`ceutically relevant solution conditions.
`Glucagon-like peptide-1(7-37)-OH (GLP-1) is a 31 amino
`acid hormoneliberated by the proteolytic processing of the
`160 amino acid precursor protein, preproglucagon. GLP-1
`stimulates the secretion of insulin and thus has the ability to
`normalize blood glucose levels (6). Interest in GLP-1 and its
`analogshas intensified recently as the attractiveness of GLP-1
`as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatmentof type II dia-
`betes has been recognized (6-8). The structure of the analog we
`have studied is shown in Figure 1 and will be abbreviated as
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1. This molecule exhibits three changes
`from the native GLP-1(7-37)-OH structure: the amino group
`has been removed from the His(7) residue (becoming des-
`amino-histidine, or imidazopropionyl and is abbreviated herein
`as IP), Lys(26) has been replaced by Arg, and Lys(34) has been
`acylated with the straight chain fatty acid octanoic acid (abbre-
`viated as oct). The present study characterizes the effect of the
`octanoyl acylation on the structure, conformation and self-
`association of this GLP-1 analog and demonstrates that these
`properties are highly solvent dependent. This molecule thus
`affords an opportunity to investigate the relationships among
`peptide secondary structure, non-covalent molecular associa-
`tion, subcutaneous bioavailability and the pharmacodynamics
`
`0724-874 1/98/0200-0254$15.00/0 © 1998 Plenum Publishing Corporation
`
`254
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 1
`
`

`

`Effects of Peptide Aggregation on Subcutaneous Absorption
`
`of a single therapeutic peptide formulated under different, phar-
`maceutically typical solution conditions. Of additional signifi-
`cance to this study is the fact that the acylation of proteins in
`vivo is a recently recognized covalent modification involved in
`intracellular signaling pathways (9). The way in whichthe acy-
`lation mediates these processes is poorly understood. The
`IP(7)R(26) GLP-1 moiety thus represents a useful model system
`to investigate the effects of acylation on peptide conformational
`and associative behavior.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials
`
`Oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 and IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 were pro-
`vided by Eli Lilly and Companyas highly purified lyophilized
`powders. All other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.
`Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline without Ca and Mg
`(PBS) was obtained from ICN Biomedical Inc. Solution con-
`centrations of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 and IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`were calculated based on the respective extinction coefficients
`of 1.95 (mg/ml)! + cm! and 2.01 (mg/ml)! - cm7! at 279 nm.
`
`Size Exclusion Chromatography
`
`Based oncriteria of selectivity and resolution, a 25 cm x
`9.4 mm Zorbax GF-250 special column was chosenfor the pre-
`sent studies with a mobile phase comprising 14 mM sodium
`phosphate dibasic adjusted to pH 7.4 with 85% phosphoric
`acid. The flow rate was 1 ml/min andthe injection volume was
`50 yl of a 1 mg/mlsolution. The eluent was detected using UV
`absorbanceat 214 nm. (Detailed studies to investigate the chro-
`matographic properties of several SEC columns under various
`mobile phase conditions were undertaken and will be reported
`elsewhere (10)).
`
`Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
`
`Circular dichroism spectra were recorded using an AVIV
`Model 62A DSspectrometer calibrated with (1S)-(+)-10-cam-
`phorsulfonic acid. Circular dichroism is reported as mean
`residueelipticity, [6],, having units of degrees + cm? + dmoi™!.
`Secondary structural analyses were performed using the pro-
`gram CONTIN (11-12).
`
`Analytical Ultracentrifugation
`
`Sedimentation equilibrium experiments were carried out
`at 4 °C in a Beckman XLAanalytical ultracentrifuge using
`absorbance optics. Cells with quartz windows and either 3 mm
`or 12 mm centerpieces were used. The apparent weight-average
`molecular weights, Myapp, were calculated from equation (1).
`
`Mwapp = (RT/((1- vp)@*rC)}-dC/dr
`
`(1)
`
`whereR is the gas constant, T is temperature, v is the partial spe-
`cific volume, p is the solvent density,r is radius, @ is the angular
`velocity and C is the total protein concentration in mg/ml. A par-
`tial specific volume of 0.726 ml/gram wascalculated from the
`amino acid composition (13). It was assumedthat the addition of
`the acyl group did not change the value of v. The solventdensity
`
`255
`
`was measured using a Paar DMA48densitometer. Data analyses
`to model the self-association and determine equilibrium con-
`stants (14) were carried out using the program NONLIN,avail-
`able through the National Analytical Ultracentrifuge Facility at
`the University of Connecticut. NONLINgives values of equilib-
`rium constants k,,, on (a mg/ml concentration scale) which refer
`to the reversible formation of an n-mer from n monomeric units,
`as described by equation (2). (Thus the tetramer constant k, 4 cor-
`respondsto the reaction of four monomersto give a tetramer; kj g
`corresponds to the reaction of eight monomers to give an
`octamer; k,s correspondsto the reaction of two tetramers to give
`an octamer). The corresponding molar equilibrium constant K; ,
`is given by equation (3).
`
`k,, =[n- mer]/[monomer]"
`
`Ky. = kj, ‘(monomer molecular weight)"/n
`
`(2)
`
`GB)
`
`Infrared Spectroscopy
`
`Infrared spectra were recorded on a Nicolet Magna 750
`Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer equipped with a
`Nicolet Nic-Plan infrared microscope. Data were acquired for
`128 scans at 4 cm’. Data acquisition and second derivative
`analysis were performed with Omnic 3.1 software.
`
`Dynamic Light Scattering
`
`Measurements were performed using a Brookhaven
`Instruments 9000 autocorrelator and goniometer. All measure-
`ments were made with a 400 um pinhole at a 90° scattering
`angle using a Lexel Model 3500 argonion laser set at 488 nm
`as the scattering source. Sample temperature was maintained
`at 25°C or 5°C by a Neslab RTE-110 temperature bath.
`Brookhaven Instruments software was used to calculate the
`diffusion coefficients of the scattering species from the mea-
`sured autocorrelation function using the method of cumulants.
`Diffusion coefficients were converted to mean diameters using
`the Stokes-Einstein relationship. Values for solution viscosi-
`ties and refractive indices were assumedto be equal to those of
`pure water.
`
`In Vivo Testing
`
`Study Design and Animals
`
`GLP-1 is an incretin peptide hormonethat stimulates
`insulin secretion from the B-cell in a glucose dependent manner
`(6). Hyperglycemic clamp experiments (150 mg/dl) were con-
`ducted using chronically cannulated, overnight-fasted, conscious
`male and female beagle dogs weighing 8-15 kg. Pharmaco-
`dynamics were evaluated from the plasmainsulin data and phar-
`macokinetics were determined from blood drug levels. The
`insulin change and drug level areas under the curve were calcu-
`lated using the trapezoidal rule. Values are reported as the mean
`+ the standard error of the mean.Prior to initiation of the study
`the animals were judged to be healthy by physical examination
`and laboratory tests. Research adhered to the Principles of
`Laboratory Animal Care of the NIH.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 2
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 2
`
`

`

`(deg.cm2.dmol"} 190
`
`Clodfelter et al.
`
`[9],
`
`300
`
`320
`
`210
`
`230
`
`250-260
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`280
`
`
`
`{@],deg.cm2.dmol"!
`
`256
`
`
`
`Fig. 1. The structure of imidazopropionyl(7) arginine(26) N®-octanoyl-
`lysine(34)-human glucagon-like peptide-1(7-37)-OH (oct-IP(7)R(26)
`GLP-1).
`
`Formulation Preparation and Administration
`
`Formulations were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal
`aspect of the neck at a dose of 3 nmol/kg. Four formulations
`stabilizing distinct conformational and self-association states
`(vide infra) of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 were evaluated. These
`formulations were prepared by dissolving lyophilized oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 under the following conditions: (i) 5 mM
`phosphate buffer, pH = 7.5 prepared at room temperature
`immediately prior to administration (Myapp approximately
`14 kDa by equilibrium sedimentation) (ii) PBS, pH = 7.5 pre-
`pared at room temperature immediately prior to administration
`(quadratic diameter approximately 10 nm by dynamic light scat-
`tering at time of dosing) (iii) PBS, pH = 7.5 prepared and stored
`at 5 °C for 24 hoursprior to dosing (quadratic diameter approx-
`imately 20 nm by dynamiclight scattering at time of dosing),
`and (iv) PBS, pH =7.5 prepared and stored at room temperature
`for 24 hours prior to dosing (quadratic diameter approximately
`50 nm by dynamiclight scattering at time of dosing).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Circular Dichroism Studies
`
`The far-UVcircular dichroism (CD) spectra of IP(7)R(26)
`GLP-1 and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 recorded under monomeric
`conditions in 5 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5 are presented in
`Figure 2A (a) and (b) respectively. These spectra show that
`octanoylation causes a slight perturbation in the far-UV CD of
`the IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 peptide (Table I). Figure 2A (a) and
`(b) appear very similar to that reported for native GLP-1 (15)
`and were found to exhibit analogous concentration dependencies
`
`Fig. 2. Panel A: Far-UV CDspectra of IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (a) and oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (b) prepared and recorded at 5 °C in 5 mM phos-
`phate buffer, pH 7.5. Oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 prepared and recorded at
`5 °C (c) and 22 °C (d) in PBS, pH 7.5. Spectra (a) and (b) were recorded
`on 0.1 mg/ml and 0.02 mg/ml solutions, respectively. IP(7)R(26)GLP-
`1 and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 are monomeric under these conditions.
`Spectra (c) and (d) were recorded on 0.5 mg/ml solutions. Only minor
`differences in the CD spectrum ofoct-IP(7)R(26) GLP-1 in PBS were
`apparent over the concentration range 0.1-0.5 mg/ml. Panel B: Near-
`UV CDspectra of IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (a) and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`(b) prepared and recorded at 5 °C in 5 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5.
`Oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 prepared and recorded at 5 °C (c) and 22 °C
`(d) in PBS, pH 7.5. Spectra were recorded on 0.5 mg/ml solutions.
`
`(an intensification with increasing concentration). A compari-
`son of the CD characteristics of each molecule in 5 mM phos-
`phate buffer pH 7.5 and in PBS showed that the IP(7)R(26)
`GLP-1 molecule possesses closely similar CD spectra in these
`two solvents, whereas the octanoylated peptide exhibits dra-
`matically different CD spectra. The CD spectrum of Figure 2A
`(c) corresponds to an oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 solution prepared
`in PBS at 5 °C. Comparisonof this spectrum with Figure 2A (b)
`showsthat a major conformational rearrangementhas occurred.
`The CD spectrum of Figure 2A (d) corresponds to an oct-IP(7)R
`(26)GLP-1 solution in PBS prepared and recorded at 22 °C. The
`data of Table I show that under these solution conditions, an
`almost complete loss of o-helical structure has occurred.
`The corresponding near-UV CD spectra are presented in
`Figure 2B. These data show that under the higher ionic strength
`conditions (PBS), oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 is characterized byrel-
`atively intense CD features with positive maximain the range
`265-295 nm. These results show that the changes in secondary
`structure evident from Figure 2A are accompanied by major
`changes in the chromophoric environments of the aromatic
`residues.
`
`Table I. Secondary Structural Analyses of the CD Spectra of Figure 2AASSSSSSAS
`
`Peptide
`
`Solvent
`
`Temp/°C %a-helix
`
`%B-sheet
`
` %remainder
`
`43
`40
`16
`5
`5 mM PB
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`42
`31
`28
`5
`5 mM PB
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`61
`16
`23
`5
`PBS
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`62
`36
`2
`22
`PBS
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`
`
`Note: Analyses were performed on 190-240 nm datausing the program CONTIN(11,12). PB refersto
`phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and PBS refers to 10 mM phosphatebuffered saline pH 7.5.
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 3
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 3
`
`

`

`257
`
`8.18 x 107” and Ky, = 1.97 x 10*, where K,4 and Ky corre-
`spond respectively to the formation of tetramers and octamers
`from monomers and Ky, corresponds to the formation of
`octamers from tetramers. For oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 the values
`were K, 4=7.29 x 10!4, K,g = 4.00 x 10° and Kys = 7.53 x 10°.
`These models generated good fits to the experimental data
`(Figure 3), although we note that they may not necessarily rep-
`resent unique fits. The larger value of K,, for the acylated
`derivative is consistent with the greater concentration depen-
`dence of weight average molecular weight over the 0-0.5 mg/ml
`concentration range. However, the subsequent formation of
`octamers from tetramers is somewhat smaller for the acylated
`compoundthan for the non-acylated compound.
`
`Dynamic Light Scattering
`
`In view of the extreme degree of aggregation of oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in PBS, dynamic light scattering was
`selected as the most appropriate technique to characterizeself-
`association under these solution conditions. The time-depen-
`dence of the aggregation of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in PBS at
`25 °C and 5 °C as‘monitored by dynamic light scattering is
`shown in Figure 4 (a) and (b) respectively. These data show
`that upon initial reconstitution of the lyophilized powder in
`PBS at 5 °C, the quadratic diameter is approximately 10 nm.
`This value increases to about 20 nm over a period of 24 hours.
`In contrast, for the reconstitution in PBS at 25 °C, theinitial
`quadratic diameter is approximately 20 nm. This value increases
`to about 50 nm overa period of 24 hours.
`
`Size Exclusion Chromatography
`
`The solvent-dependent CD spectral characteristics of oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 were found to be accompaniedbya distinc-
`tive size exclusion chromatographic (SEC) signature. The SEC
`
`(nm)
`
`QuadraticDiameter
`

`
`a (
`
`b)
`0,000e00 0 0900%o
`fogeoee?”?
`ee
`Mo90o%— 00070090
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`
`Time (hours)
`Fig. 4. Dynamic light scattering data for a 0.5 mg/mi solution of oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 formulated in PBS at 25 °C (a) and 5 °C (b). These
`data show the time dependence of
`the aggregation of oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 under these solution conditions. The aggregation
`states shownby dataset(a) at t= 0 and t = 24 hours correspondto those
`of the samples administered in the dog studies of Figure 7 A and B (b)
`and Figure 7 C and D (c), respectively. The aggregation state shown by
`dataset (b) at t = 24 hours corresponds to that of the PBS sample
`administered in the dog study of Figure 7 C and D (b).
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 4
`
`Effects of Peptide Aggregation on Subcutaneous Absorption
`
`Equilibrium Sedimentation Studies
`
`Detailed analytical ultracentrifugation experiments were
`performed on IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`under low ionic strength conditions. In 5 mM phosphate buffer
`pH 7.5 at 4 °C, the non-acylated compound reached equilib-
`rium in about 25 hours. For the acylated derivative, it was noted
`that a very slight loss of material occurred with time, possibly
`due to the slow formation of a small fraction of highly aggre-
`gated species. On the assumption that the acylated molecule
`wasclose to equilibrium, the apparent weight average molecu-
`lar weights were calculated and plotted against concentration
`(Figure 3). Each curve was constructed using data from three
`cells having different loading concentrations. Overlap of these
`data was good for each molecule, consistent with self-associa-
`tion. Since native GLP-1(7-37) has been reported to self-asso-
`ciate to tetramers (16), an ideal monomer-tetramer-octamer
`self-association model was chosen. A goodfit of concentration
`versus radius was achieved with this model for all three cells
`for IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 and is shownin Figure 3. For the acylated
`derivative, the monomer-tetramer-octamer model fit the data
`well in the lower concentration region butnot at higher concen-
`trations. However, by including a non-ideality term in the mod-
`eling, it was possible to achieve a good fit of these data to a
`monomer-tetramer-octamer association mechanism. The molar
`equilibrium constants obtained from the curve fit
`to the
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 data of Figure 3 were K, 4= 6.44 x 10"!, K, g=
`
`2
`
`1.5
`1
`[peptide] (mg/ml)
`Fig. 3. Equilibrium sedimentation data for IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (open
`symbols) and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (solid symbols) in 5 mM phos-
`phate buffer pH = 7.5, 4 °C. The solid curves were calculated for a
`monomer-tetramer-octamerself-association mechanism using the pro-
`gram NONLIN. M,/M, represents the weight average molecular
`weight obtained from ultracentrifugation divided by the molecular
`weight of monomer.
`
`Mw/Mi
`
`0
`
`0.5
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 4
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 4
`
`

`

`258
`
`Clodfelter et al.
`
`profiles of IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 pre-
`pared in 5 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5 are presentedin Figure 5
`(a) and (b) respectively. SEC profiles (c) and (d) correspondto
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 solutions prepared in PBS at 5 °C and
`22 °C respectively, and aged at these temperatures for 24 hours
`prior to analysis. These data show that the SEC retention times
`of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 solutions prepared in 5 mM phosphate
`buffer at 5 °C and in PBS at 5 °C are equivalent. However,in
`PBSat 22 °C the SECretention time of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 is
`dramatically different and indicative of a much higher apparent
`molecular weight. It was determined that this aggregated
`species could be disaggregated in solution by incorporating
`30% acetonitrile into the PBS solvent. SEC analysis of this
`sample (Figure 5 (e)) produced an SECretention time equalto
`that of Figure 5 (b). This result indicates that the species corre-
`sponding to the SEC peak in Figure 5 (d) is a hydrophobically
`associated soluble aggregate. The broadnessof the oct-IP(7)R
`(26)GLP-1 peak in (b)}-(e) is probably due to enhanced hydro-
`phobic interactions between the peptide and the column pack-
`ing in addition to on-column equilibria involving a range of
`aggregationstates (17). The chromatogramsof Figure 5 (b) and
`(c) exhibit the sameretention time, however, the dynamiclight
`scattering and equilibrium sedimentation data presented herein
`show that these samples correspond to different states of self-
`association. The difference between these two aggregation
`States is not evident by this SEC method, thus it is inferred
`that the SEC column conditions disrupt the non covalent self-
`association that occurs in PBS at 5 °C. In contrast, the SEC
`characteristics suggest a different entity in PBS at 22 °C, an
`interpretation in accord with the dynamic light scattering data
`of Figure 4 and the distinctive CD spectroscopic characteris-
`tics. Evidently, the peptide molecules are more strongly self-
`associated in PBS at 22 °C than underthe solution conditions of
`Figure 5 (a)-(c). It is speculated that this aggregate corresponds
`to a micellar species for which the different CD and SEC char-
`acteristics in PBS at 5 °C versus 22 °C, correspond to tempera-
`tures that bracketthecritical micelle temperature.
`
`Infrared Spectroscopy
`
`Infrared spectroscopy provides a convenient method to
`probe protein conformation andstructure in the solid state. The
`infrared spectral profiles of the amide region of oct-IP(7)R
`(26)GLP-1 are presented in Figure 6. Spectrum (A) corre-
`spondsto oct-IP(7)R(@6)GLP-1, lyophilized from 5 mM phos-
`phate buffer pH 7.5. This spectrum exhibits amide I and amide
`Ii bands at 1659 cm™! and 1542 cm" respectively, values con-
`sistent with an appreciable a-helical secondary structure con-
`tent (18). Spectra (B) and (C) correspond to samples of
`oct-IP(7)R (26)GLP-1 each lyophilized from PBS, pH 7.5, that
`had been aged 24 hours at 5 °C and 22 °C respectively. Spectra
`(B) and (C) both exhibit features at 1695 cm™! (shoulder) 1660
`cm7! (main) and 1625 cm“! (shoulder), resolved in the second
`derivative spectra (not shown). By comparison to spectrum (A)
`these spectra show that a major conformational change has
`taken place as a result of dissolving oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in
`PBS prior to lyophilization. The IR spectral profiles of (B) and
`(C) are consistent with a significant increase in B-sheet content
`(18). The data of Figure 6 establish that in the solid state the
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 species can adopt a secondary structure
`that is either predominantly a-helical or predominantly B-sheet
`depending upon the solution conditions from which it was
`lyophilized. These infrared results on the solid state are in con-
`formity with the CD data for oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in solution.
`
`In Vivo Testing
`
`The data of Figure 7 compare the plasmainsulin responses
`(A and C) and the plasma drug levels (B and D) for oct-
`
`arn
`
`Abs
`214nm
`
`Absorbance
`
`ioe
`
`0
`
`240
`
`480
`
`720
`
`960
`
`1200
`
`Time (seconds)
`Fig. 5. Size exclusion chromatograms recorded on IP(7)R(26)GLP- 1
`(a) and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 (b) solutions prepared at 5 °C in 5 mM
`phosphate buffer, pH = 7.5. Chromatograms(c) and (d) were recorded
`on oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 solutions prepared in PBS at 5 °C and 22 °C
`respectively, and aged at these temperatures for 24 hoursprior to
`analysis. Chromatogram (e) corresponds to a solution of oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 prepared in an identical mannerto (d) that had 30%
`acetonitrile incorporated into the sample solvent immediately prior to
`SEC analysis. All samples were prepared at a peptide concentration of
`1 mg/ml.
`
`1800
`
`1700
`
`1400
`1500
`1600
`Wavenumber (cm-1)
`Fig. 6. FTIR spectra recorded on solid samples of oct-IP(7)R
`(26)GLP-1 prepared by lyophilization from the following solutions;
`(A) 5 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, T = 5 °C (B) PBS, pH 7.5, T=5
`°C (C) PBS, pH 7.5, T = 22°C.
`
`1300
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 5
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 5
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 5
`
`

`

`Effects of Peptide Aggregation on Subcutaneous Absorption
`
`anQo2om)
`
`nN>2Oo Plasma[oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1](pM) SSs
`Plasma[Insulin](ng/ml)
`
`
`
`
`2000 Plasma[Oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1](pM)
`
`
`Plasma[Insulin](ng/ml)
`
`
`
`259
`
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 administered underfour different formulation
`conditions. The data labeled (a) correspondto a vehicle control in
`which PBS was administered. In Figure 7 A and B, the curves
`labeled (c) correspond to oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 formulated in
`5 mM phosphate buffer, and the curves labeled (b) correspondto
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 formulated in PBS at room temperature
`and administered immediately upon dissolution of
`the
`lyophilized oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in these solvents. In this exper-
`iment, the quadratic diameter of the peptide in the formulation
`corresponding to (b) was determined by dynamic lightscattering
`to be 20 nm (Figure 4). The apparent molecular weight ofthe for-
`mulation corresponding to (c) was determined by equilibrium
`sedimentation to be about 14 kDa. The data of Figure 7 A and B
`show that oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 formulated in 5 mM phosphate
`buffer, pH 7.5 elicits a more rapid onset of action and is more
`rapidly absorbed from the subcutaneoussite than the PBS for-
`mulation. The areas under the curves A(b) and A(c) are 190+ 50
`and 340 + 140 ng/ml: min respectively. The areas under the
`curves B(b) and B(c) are 240,000 + 20,000 and 400,000 + 90,000
`pM-minrespectively. This comparison suggeststhat the bioavail-
`ability of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 is greater for the 5 mM phos-
`phate buffer formulation than for the PBS formulation.
`The data of Figure 7 C and D compare the plasmainsulin
`response and the plasma drug levels for oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`formulated in PBS and aged 24 hours at 5 °C (b) and at room
`temperature (c) prior to administration. The dynamiclight scat-
`tering data of Figure 4 showsthat these formulation conditions
`correspond to quadratic diameters of 20 nm and 50 nm forthe
`5 °C and room temperature formulations respectively. The data
`of Figure 7 C and D showthat the plasma insulin response of
`the PBS formulation aged at room temperature is negligible and
`that the plasmalevels of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 are dramatically
`reduced. The areas under the curves C(b) and C(c) are 330 + 90
`and 10 + 100 ng/ml- min respectively.
`The areas under the curves D(b) and D(c) are 250,000 +
`40,000 and 50,000 + 10,000 pM min respectively. These data
`establish that the effect of aging the oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 PBS
`formulation at room temperature has been to diminish its
`absorption from the subcutaneoussite so severely that its phar-
`macodynamiceffect has been totally abolished.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The biophysical studies herein identify three distinct con-
`formational and self-association states of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 6
`
`200
`
`6000_—COO.v’lOD™DUU”
`
`Fig. 7. Comparison of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics
`of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 formulated under four different solution con-
`ditions. Plasma insulin response and oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 concentra-
`tions were measured in normal, overnight-fasted dogs after
`subcutaneousinjection of 3 nmol/kg of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1. Vehicle
`controls (n = 5) correspond to a subcutaneous injection of PBS (a).
`Panels A and B: Pharmacodynamics (A) and pharmacokinetics (B) of
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 in PBS (n = 6) (b) versus 5 mM phosphate
`buffer pH 7.5 (n = 4) (c). The formulations were prepared at room tem-
`perature and administered immediately upon reconstitution of
`lyophilized peptide. Panels C and D: Pharmacodynamics (C) and
`pharmacokinetics (D) of a solution of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 prepared
`in PBS andstored at 5 °C, (n = 2) (b) and ambient room temperature
`(n = 2) (c) for 24 hoursprior to administration.
`
`4000
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`50
`
`0
`.
`Time from Injection (min)
`
`100
`
`150
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 6
`
`MPI EXHIBIT 1015 PAGE 6
`
`

`

`260
`
`Clodfelteret al.
`
`that are each stabilized by different, but pharmaceutically typical
`solution conditions. In 5 mM phosphate buffer pH = 7.5, oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 possesses significant o-helical structure and
`exhibits an apparent molecular weight consistent with a predom-
`inantly tetrameric self-association state. In PBS, the secondary
`structure is predominantly B-sheet, andthe self-association state
`is temperature dependent. At 5 °C in PBS, oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1
`possesses a quadratic diameter of about 20 nm, whereasat 22 °C
`in PBS it is 50 nm andthis peptide exhibits a unique SEC reten-
`tion time. The biological data herein show that, in comparison to
`the o-helical formulation, the highly associated B-sheet form of
`oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 retains a high level of subcutaneous
`bioavailability when formulated and stored at 5 °C. Evidently,
`under these formulation conditions the non-covalent B-sheet-B-
`sheet interactions are weak enough to be disrupted by dilution
`within the subcutaneousspace,thusfacilitating drug transporta-
`tion and absorption. However, these additional non-covalent
`interactionsgive rise to perturbed pharmacokinetics, presumably
`due to altered dissociation and absorption properties at the sub-
`cutaneoussite. In addition, differences in the relative transport
`properties via the lymphatic and capillary vessels of the two
`physicochemical states may also contribute to the different phar-
`macokinetics of these formulations (19). In contrast, the PBS for-
`mulation of oct-IP(7)R(26)GLP-1i at room temperature is
`biologically inactive. Our experiments suggest that under these
`solution conditions, the formation of this micelle-like form is
`essentially irreversible and dilution within the subcutaneous
`space is not sufficient to dissociate this aggregate into readily
`absorbed units. The conformation(s) of GLP-1 relevant to recep-
`tor binding is not known; however, it is noteworthy that oct-
`IP(7)R(26)GLP-1 represents an exampleofa peptide that may be
`administered in two distinctly different secondary structural
`states, both of which elicit biological responses. Evidently this
`peptide adopts the biologically active conformation upon post-
`administration equilibration or alternatively, the population of a
`unique se

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket