throbber
6/26/24, 2:59 PM
`
`CNN - Windows 95 Y2K fix was kept from users - May 3, 1999
`
`I
`
`sci-tech > computing> story page
`
`.com.
`
`~
`MAIN PAGE
`WORLD
`ASIANOW
`U.S.
`LOCAL
`POLITICS
`WEATHER
`BUSINESS
`SPORTS
`TECHNOLOGY
`
`£2!!!!;!Utlng,
`i;iersonal technologv.
`irnace
`NATURE
`ENTERTAINMENT
`BOOKS
`TRAVEL
`FOOD
`HEALTH
`STYLE
`IN-DEPTH
`
`custom news
`Headline News brief
`dailY. almanac
`CNN networks
`CNN P.rQ9@!!1§
`on-air transcri[!ls
`news guiz
`
`ENliSPAA'O
`em DOllllauie
`SVtE .• S KA
`NCJPHi
`daftmal'II:
`TIME INC. SITES:
`Go To ... v
`MORE SERVICES:
`video on demand
`video archive
`audio on demand
`news email services
`free email accounts
`desktoP. headlines
`P.Ointcast
`P.sgenet
`
`DISCUSSION:
`~
`geboards
`chat
`feedback
`
`SITE GUIDES:
`helP.
`contents
`search
`
`Windows 95 Y2K fix was kept
`from users
`
`May 3, 1999
`Web posted at: 11 :28 a.m . EDT (1528 GMT)
`
`r'\. .2k
`i,,;.,y
`
`by Julia King
`
`(IDG) -- For almost a year,
`Microsoft Corp. withheld from its
`125 million corporate users of
`Windows 95 the information that a
`software patch was in the works to
`make the desktop operating system
`fully year 2000-compliant, a
`Microsoft official confirmed last
`week.
`
`ALSO
`fil9.!l.Y.P. for the ComP.uter Connection
`email service
`
`"I don't want people taking action
`For more com(!uting stories
`based on Microsoft thinking about doing something," said Don Jones,
`year 2000 product manager at Microsoft. "Until I'm 100% sure that
`we're going to provide an update or fix, I don't want to tell anybody,"
`Jones added. "People will spend millions of dollars, [implementing
`strategies based on such information], and the last thing I want to do is
`spread fear, uncertainty and doubt in their minds."
`
`One company now gearing up to spend millions on an upgrade from
`Windows 95 to 98 -- based at least partly on year 2000 concerns -- is
`Electronic Data Systems Corp. Until mid-March, EDS officials
`believed -- like all Windows 95 users -- that Microsoft wouldn't make
`Windows 95 fully year 2000-compliant. At best, they were told,
`Windows 95 would be "compliant, with minor issues."
`
`Jones' comments are the latest in a series
`of clarifications, memos and statements to
`emerge from Microsoft since March 29,
`when Computerworld ran a front-page
`story about EDS's about-face plan to
`migrate 100,000-plus desktops from
`Windows 95 to 98.
`
`Previously, EDS planned to stick with
`Windows 95, but it changed course on
`Microsoft's advice to the company,
`according to an internal memo by former
`CIO Gary Rudin, who abruptly resigned
`from EDS on March 31.
`
`MORE COMPUTING INTELLIGENCE
`
`I~ I IDG.net home PJ!.9!
`
`Com12uterworld's home P.sgg
`
`Com12uterworld Year 2000 resource
`center
`
`Com[!uterworld's online subscriP.tion
`center
`
`Reviews & in-depth info at IDG.net
`
`IDG.net's P.ersonal news P.agg
`
`Year 2000 World
`
`Questions about com[!uters? Let
`IDG.net's editors help you
`
`Subscribe to IDG.net's free dailY.
`newsletter for IT leaders
`
`Search IDG.net in 12 languages
`
`News Radio
`
`Comi;iuterworld Minute
`
`FASTER ACCESS:
`
`fil!.[Q[!l!
`
`Microsoft denies
`
`www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9905/03/fix.y2k.idg/
`
`1/3
`
`

`

`6/26/24, 2:59 PM
`
`WEB SERVICES:
`
`CNN - Windows 95 Y2K fix was kept from users - May 3, 1999
`But then and now, Microsoft officials
`insist they never advised EDS or any other
`corporate customer to remain on Windows
`95 or to upgrade to Windows 98 for year 2000- readiness reasons.
`
`Fusion audio P.rlmers
`
`So why would the CIO of EDS send out a memo saying as much?
`
`"You'll have to ask Gary [Rudin]," Jones said. "It's certainly not our
`policy. We do recommend that people go to the latest versions of our
`operating system, but not for year 2000 reasons."
`
`Rudin didn't return telephone calls last week.
`
`Also, following the March 29 story about EDS, Microsoft issued an
`internal market bulletin to its sales staff to eliminate what it described
`as "confusion" generated by the Computerworld story.
`
`Among other things, the bulletin told salespeople that "the
`Computerworld article is very misleading," and despite the article's
`suggestions, "Microsoft's position on Windows 95 Year 2000
`compliance has not changed."
`
`Yet under a section titled "Facts Regarding ... Year 2000 Compliance,"
`the company tells its salespeople that "Microsoft is providing a
`software update for Windows 95 to resolve the outstanding minor
`issues."
`
`When questioned by Computerworld reporters, Microsoft officials
`couldn't specify any incorrect or misleading information in the March
`29 story.
`
`SPECIAL SECTION:
`
`Looking at the Y2K Bug_
`
`RELATED STORIES:
`
`Test v.our sv.stems for Y2K
`~P.Ot & fix Y2K 12roblems in Windows 9x & NT
`Y2K niP.S NT users
`
`RELATED IDG.net STORIES:
`
`Look closelv. at Y2K-readiness
`( Computerworld)
`Medicare's Y2K-readiness in doubt
`(FCW)
`Old switches, routers 12ose Y2K threat
`(Network World Fusion)
`What's the deal with Y2K cards?
`(PC World Online)
`Microsoft releases Y2K tools
`(PC World Online)
`Norton 2000 stam12s out elusive Y2K bull§.
`(FCW)
`Download the Windows 95 Y2K 12atch from FileWorld
`(PC World Online)
`IDG.net's Year 2000 World
`(IDG.net)
`
`Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
`External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
`
`RELATED SITES:
`
`Microsoft Cor12.
`Electronic Data Sv.stems Cor12.
`
`Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
`External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
`
`LATEST HEADLINES:
`
`SEARCH CNN.com
`
`Enter keyword(s)
`
`www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9905/03/fix.y2k.idg/
`
`2/3
`
`

`

`6/26/24, 2:59 PM
`
`Back to the toP-
`
`CNN - Windows 95 Y2K fix was kept from users - May 3, 1999
`
`© 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved .
`Terms under which this service is provided to you .
`Read our P.rivacy_guidelines.
`
`www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9905/03/fix.y2k.idg/
`
`3/3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket