`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner
`v.
`DODOTS LICENSING SOLUTIONS LLC,
`Patent Owner
`Case IPR2023-00701
`U.S. Patent No. 8,510,407 B1
`__________________________________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR
`ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 316(a)(10), 37.CFR § 42.70(a), and the Scheduling
`
`Order (Paper 11), Patent Owner DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC (“Patent
`
`Owner”) respectfully requests oral argument on the following issues raised in this
`
`proceeding:
`
`1.
`
`The validity of claims 1-4, 7-11, 13-16, 19-23 over Brown (Ground
`
`1A of the Petition).
`
`2.
`
`The validity of claims 1-4, 7-16, 19-24 over Brown and Wecker
`
`(Ground 1B of the Petition).
`
`3.
`
`The validity of claims 5-6, 17-18 over Brown and Beer, and/or Brown,
`
`Wecker, and Beer.
`
`4.
`
`The validity of claim 1-24 over Shimada and Buchholz (Ground 2 of
`
`the Petition).
`
`5.
`
`Any other issue raised in any paper of record in this proceeding.
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the oral hearing be held in-person
`
`and that each party have 45 minutes of argument time for a total of one and a half
`
`hours for the session.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner also requests that its attorneys be allowed to use computers at
`
`the hearing (in addition to the counsel making the argument using his or her
`
`computer to show the demonstratives) to avoid the need for the parties to bring
`
`entire paper copies of the record into the hearing room and to facilitate efficient
`
`
`
`answering of panel questions. Patent Owner further requests the use of audio-
`
`visual equipment suitable to display papers of record and demonstrative exhibits,
`
`including a computer-connectable projector, an ELMO, and a screen.
`
`Patent Owner further requests the services of a court reporter to transcribe
`
`the proceeding.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 29, 2024
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /Jason S. Charkow/
`Jason S. Charkow (USPTO Reg. No. 46,418)*
`Richard Juang (USPTO Reg. No. 71,478)*
`Chandran B. Iyer (USPTO Reg. No. 48,434)
`Ronald M Daignault*
`jcharkow@dagignaultiyer.com
`richard.juang@gmail.com
`cbiyer@dagignaultiyer.com
`rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`*Not admitted in Virginia
`
`Attorneys for DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing PATENT OWNER’S
`
`REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) was
`
`served electronically via email on May 29, 2024, on the following counsel of
`
`record for Petitioner:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`Jeremy J. Monaldo
`Hyun Jin In
`Michael Ballanco
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`60 South Sixth Street, Suite 3200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`IPR39843-0149IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`jjm@fr.com
`in@fr.com
`ballanco@fr.com
`
`
`Dated: May 29, 2024
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`By: / Jason S. Charkow /
`
`Jason S. Charkow
` USPTO Reg. No. 46,418
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
