`U.S. Patent No. 10,129,825
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC,
`Petitioners,
`v.
`THETA IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2023-00697
`U.S. Patent No. 10,129,825
`
`DECLARATION OF COREY JOHANNINGMEIER IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`IPR2023-00697
`Theta EX2001
`
`
`
`I, Corey Johanningmeier, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to
`
`IPR2023-00697
`U.S. Patent No. 10,129,825
`
`
`
`the following:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of California.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been denied an application for admission to practice
`
`before any court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has ever been imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in Part 42 of Title 37,
`
`Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`In the last three (3) years, I have appeared pro hac vice before the
`
`Office in unrelated matters IPR2020-00122, IPR2020-00123, IPR2022-00575,
`
`IPR2022-00576, IPR2022-01283, IPR2021-00076, IPR2021-00077, and IPR2022-
`
`00792, wherein the Board granted my pro hac vice application. I also filed a pro
`
`hac vice application in another related proceeding, IPR2020-00484, which was
`
`IPR2023-00697
`Theta EX2001
`
`
`
`
`terminated before a ruling on my application was made, and submitted an
`
`IPR2023-00697
`U.S. Patent No. 10,129,825
`
`
`application in an ex parte reexamination Appeal, 2022-004880, which was not
`
`granted for technical reasons.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney having familiarity with the
`
`subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I have been practicing law since 2007
`
`and have extensive experience litigating patent infringement cases in many
`
`different District Courts across the country and in the Federal Circuit, including
`
`participation in multiple trials, Markman hearings, summary judgment
`
`proceedings, and other patent-related hearings and pleadings concerning, inter alia,
`
`patent validity and/or infringement. I have presented and cross-examined
`
`inventors and expert witnesses in patent trials. I have also received professional
`
`recognition in the field of patent litigation, such as invitations to speak and publish
`
`on patent litigation matters, and have been recognized as a “Super Lawyers Rising
`
`Star,” a “Super Lawyer,” and a Managing Intellectual Property “IP STAR.”
`
`9.
`
`I am very familiar with the ’825 Patent and the subject matter at issue
`
`in this inter partes review proceeding. I am one of the primary attorneys in the
`
`pending District Court litigations in Theta IP, LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC, et
`
`al., Case No. 1:22-cv-03441 (N.D. Ill.) and Theta IP, LLC v. Apple Inc., Case No.
`
`6:23-cv-00314-ADA (W.D. Tex.), in which the ’825 Patent is asserted. I have
`
`represented Patent Owner against Petitioner in those pending District Court
`
`
`
`2
`
`IPR2023-00697
`Theta EX2001
`
`
`
`
`litigations since their commencement. As counsel in the District Court litigations,
`
`IPR2023-00697
`U.S. Patent No. 10,129,825
`
`
`I have, among other things, been extensively involved with analysis of the ’825
`
`Patent, including with respect to validity issues.
`
`10.
`
`In addition, I was one of the primary attorneys representing Theta in
`
`the District Court litigation Theta IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Case
`
`No. WA:20-cv-00160-AD (W.D. Tex.) in which the ’825 Patent was asserted.
`
` declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
` I
`
`Executed this 23rd day of May, 2023, in Oakland, California.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Corey Johanningmeier
`Corey Johanningmeier
`
`
`
`3
`
`IPR2023-00697
`Theta EX2001
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
