`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`COOLER MASTER CO., LTD.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`ASETEK DANMARK A/S,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`Patent No. 8,240,362
`Title: COOLING SYSTEM FOR A COMPUTER SYSTEM
`
`IPR Case No.: IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`INITIAL STATEMENT ................................................................................. 1
`
`I.
`
`A.
`B.
`
`Patent Owner Did Not Invent the “All-in-One” Cooler. ...................... 1
`The ’362 Patent Claims Are Similar to Those This Board Has
`Already Invalidated. ............................................................................. 1
`IDENTIFICATION OF CHALLENGE UNDER 37 C.F.R.
`§42.104(B) AND RELIEF REQUESTED ..................................................... 2
`III. OVERVIEW OF THE ’362 PATENT ........................................................... 2
`Embodiments Claimed in Challenged Claims ..................................... 4
`Priority Date ......................................................................................... 5
`The Challenged Claims ........................................................................ 5
`
`II.
`
`IV.
`
`V.
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART (“POSITA”) .................... 5
`
`CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................... 6
`
`“reservoir” ............................................................................................ 6
`“chamber” ............................................................................................. 7
`“impeller” ............................................................................................. 7
`“radiator” .............................................................................................. 7
`Other Terms .......................................................................................... 8
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`D.
`E.
`VI. OVERVIEW OF PRIOR ART ....................................................................... 8
`Batchelder (Ex-1006) ........................................................................... 8
`Shin (Ex-1007) ..................................................................................... 8
`Nakano (Ex-1008) ................................................................................ 9
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`VII. CLAIM ELEMENT NUMBERING KEY ..................................................... 9
`VIII. SPECIFIC GROUNDS FOR PETITION ..................................................... 24
`GROUND 1: Claims 1, 3-11, 13, and 17-19 are rendered
`obvious over the combination of Batchelder and Shin. ..................... 24
`Batchelder in view of Shin discloses or teaches each
`limitation of claim 1. ................................................................ 25
`
`A.
`
`
`
`ii
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`B.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Batchelder in view of Shin discloses or teaches each
`limitation of claims 3-11 and 13. ............................................. 56
`Batchelder in view of Shin discloses or teaches each
`limitation of claim 17. .............................................................. 69
`Batchelder in view of Shin discloses or teaches each
`limitation of claims 18 and 19. ................................................ 71
`GROUND 2: Claims 12 and 14 to 16 are rendered obvious over
`the combination of Batchelder and Shin in view of Nakano. ............ 73
`Batchelder in view of Shin and further in view of Nakano
`discloses or teaches each limitation of claim 12. ..................... 73
`The motivation to combine Nakano with Batchelder
`and Shin. ................................................................................... 76
`Batchelder in view of Shin and further in view of Nakano
`discloses or teaches each limitation of claim 14. ..................... 78
`Batchelder in view of Shin and further in view of Nakano
`discloses or teaches each limitation of claims 15 and 16. ....... 82
`SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................... 83
`
`X.
`XI. REQUIREMENTS FOR IPR UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.104 .......................... 83
`Grounds for Standing Under 37 C.F.R. §42.104(a) ........................... 83
`Identification of Challenge Under 37 C.F.R. §42.104(b) and
`Relief Requested ................................................................................. 84
`XII. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 84
`XIII. MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.8(a)(1) FOR
`INTER PARTES REVIEW ............................................................................ 85
`Real Party in Interest Under 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1) ........................... 85
`Related Matters Under 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2) ................................... 86
`Lead and Backup Counsel Under 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3) and
`Service Information under 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(4) .............................. 86
`
`
`IX.
`
`
`
`PAYMENT OF FEES UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.15 ....................................... 83
`
`A.
`B.
`
`A.
`B.
`C.
`
`iii
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
` Page(s)
`
`Cases
`Asetek Danmark A/S v. CMI USA, Inc.,
`Case No. 4:13-cv-00457-JST (N.D. Cal.) .......................................................... 85
`Asetek Danmark A/S v. Shenzhen Apaltek Co.,
`Case No. 3:22-cv-06179-WHO (N.D. Cal.) ....................................................... 86
`Cooler Master Co., Ltd. et al v. Asetek Danmark A/S,
`Case No. 5:21-cv-04627-EJD (N.D. Cal.) .................................................... 85, 86
`In re Ethicon, Inc.,
`844 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2017) .......................................................................... 41
`Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Apotex Inc.,
`748 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2014) .................................................................... 65, 66
`KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.,
`550 U.S. 398 (2007) ................................................................................ 24, 77, 83
`In re Mouttet,
`686 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2012) .................................................................... 24, 25
`PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.,
`522 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2008) ............................................................................ 5
`Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enters., Inc.,
`632 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2011) .......................................................................... 83
`Statutes
`35 U.S.C. §102(a) ...................................................................................................... 8
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e) ..................................................................................................... 9
`35 U.S.C. §103 ........................................................................................................... 2
`35 U.S.C. §315(c) .................................................................................................... 84
`Other Authorities
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(a)(1) ............................................................................................... 85
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1) ............................................................................................... 85
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2) ............................................................................................... 86
`
`iv
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3) ............................................................................................... 86
`37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(4) ............................................................................................... 86
`37 C.F.R. §42.15 ...................................................................................................... 83
`37 C.F.R. § 42.15(a) ................................................................................................. 83
`37 C.F.R. §42.24(a)(1)(i) ......................................................................................... 88
`37 C.F.R. §42.24(D)................................................................................................. 88
`37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b) ................................................................................................ 6
`37 C.F.R. §42.104 .................................................................................................... 83
`37 C.F.R. §42.104(a) ................................................................................................ 83
`37 C.F.R. §42.122 .................................................................................................... 84
`August 2021, IPR2021-01195 ................................................................................. 86
`IPR2020-00522, IPR2020-00523 ............................................................................ 86
`U.S. Patent No. 6,019,165 .......................................................................................... 8
`U.S. Patent No. 6,915,653 .......................................................................................... 9
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362 .................................................................................passim
`U.S. Patent No. 10,078,354 .................................................................................... 1, 2
`U.S. Patent No. 10,599,196 ...................................................................................... 86
`U.S. Patent No. 10,613,601 ...................................................................................... 86
`
`
`
`
`
`v
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`TABLE OF EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362 (“’362 patent”)
`
`File history of U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362 (“’362-FH”)
`
`Declaration of Georgios Karamanis, Ph.D. Regarding Invalidity of
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362 (“Karamanis Dec.”)
`
`(Reserved)
`
`Defendants’ Reply Claim Construction Brief filed on April 12,
`2022 in Asetek Danmark A/S v. Shenzhen Apaltek Co., Ltd., Case
`No. 6:21-cv-501-ADA (W.D. Tex.) (Doc. 61)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,019,165 to Batchelder (“Batchelder”)
`
`Certified Translation of Japanese Unexamined Patent App. Pub.
`No. 2002-151638 to Takayuki Shin (“Shin”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,915,653 to Nakano et al. (“Nakano”)
`
`Patent Owner’s Response, Paper No. 21 in IPR2020-00523 (Nov.
`30 2020) (“’354-POR”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,078,354 (the “’354 patent”)
`
`Final Written Decision in IPR2020-00523, Paper No. 36 (Aug. 19,
`2021) (“’354-FWD”)
`
`vi
`
`
`
`Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`Cooler Master Co., Ltd. (“CMC” or “Petitioner”) hereby seeks inter partes
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`review of Claims 1 and 3-19 (“the Challenged Claims”) of U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,240,362. (Ex-1001 (the “’362 patent”)) of Asetek Danmark A/S (“Patent Owner.”)
`
`I.
`
`INITIAL STATEMENT
`A.
`Patent Owner Did Not Invent the “All-in-One” Cooler.
` The ’362 patent discloses a liquid cooling system used in a computer system.
`
`The use of liquid cooling to cool semiconductor chips in computer systems was
`
`generally known to a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA”) long before the
`
`claimed November 7, 2003 priority date of the ’362 patent claims. (Ex-1003, 26¶.)
`
`The use of closed liquid cooling loops that utilize what is sometimes referred to in
`
`the industry as an “all-in-one” cooler (i.e., a modular pumping mechanism, what
`
`Patent Owner calls a “reservoir” in the ’362 patent, that pumps the liquid through
`
`the loop) was also generally known to a POSITA long before the claimed priority
`
`date of the ’362 patent. (Id.; see also Ex-1006-Batchelder; Ex-1007-Shin.) The ’362
`
`patent only discloses and claims a specific embodiment of such an “all-in-one”
`
`cooler. (Ex-1003, ¶26.)
`
`B. The ’362 Patent Claims Are Similar to Those This Board Has
`Already Invalidated.
`The ’362 patent is a parent of Application No. 15/626,393, which issued as
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,078,354 (the “’354 patent”). (Ex-1001, 1:4-5; Ex-1010 (’354
`
`patent, issued from “(21) Appl. No.: 15/626,393”).) Claims 1, 4, 8, 14, 15, and 19
`
`1
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`of the ’354 patent have been found unpatentable by a Final Written Decision in
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`IPR2020-00523. (Ex-1011, 354-FWD). The IPR relating to the ’354 patent is
`
`instructive, given that the Challenged Claims here are similar to those in the ’354
`
`patent the Board has invalidated. (See id. at 30-31).
`
`II.
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF CHALLENGE UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.104(B)
`AND RELIEF REQUESTED
`Petitioner respectfully requests that the Challenged Claims of the ’362 patent
`
`be cancelled based on the following grounds of unpatentability:
`
`Ground of
`Unpatentability
`
`’362 Patent Claim(s)
`
`Basis for Rejection under 35
`U.S.C. §103
`
`Ground 1
`
`1, 3-11, 13, 17-19
`
`Ground 2
`
`12, 14-16
`
`Rendered obvious over Batchelder
`in view of Shin
`
`Rendered obvious over Batchelder
`in view of Shin and further in view
`of Nakano
`
`III. OVERVIEW OF THE ’362 PATENT
`The ’362 patent relates to a liquid-cooling system for a central processing unit
`
`(CPU) or other processing unit of a computer system. (Ex-1001, 1:12-14; Ex-1003,
`
`¶25.) The specification purports to disclose embodiments of a small and compact
`
`liquid-cooling solution that is more efficient than existing air-cooling arrangements
`
`and
`
`that can be produced
`
`in high volume and at
`
`low cost.
`
` (Id.,
`
`2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`1:53-56.) The ’362 patent further states (and subsequently claims) that these
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`improvements may be obtained by:
`
`a cooling system for a computer system, said computer system
`comprising: at least one unit such as a central processing unit (CPU)
`generating thermal energy and said cooling system intended for cooling
`the at least one processing unit, a reservoir having an amount of cooling
`liquid, said cooling liquid intended for accumulating and transferring
`of thermal energy dissipated from the processing unit to the cooling
`liquid, a heat exchanging interface for providing thermal contact
`between the processing unit and the cooling liquid for dissipating heat
`from the processing unit to the cooling liquid, a pump being provided
`as part of an integrate element, said integrate element comprising the
`heat exchanging interface, the reservoir and the pump, said pump
`intended for pumping the cooling liquid into the reservoir, through the
`reservoir and from the reservoir to a heat radiating means, said heat
`radiating means intended for radiating thermal energy from the cooling
`liquid, dissipated to the cooling liquid, to surroundings of the heat
`radiating means.
`(Id., 1:63-2:17; see also id. claims 1-16.)
`As shown in detail in this Petition, however, the Challenged Claims of
`
`the ’362 patent are not inventive.
`
`3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`A.
`Embodiments Claimed in Challenged Claims
`Figure 8—annotated on
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`Tube outlet
`connection
`
`the right with red and blue
`
`arrows indicating the direction
`
`of coolant flow—captures the
`
`main characteristics of
`
`the
`
`purported invention claimed in
`
`the Challenged Claims. (Ex-
`
`1003, ¶27.) “FIG. 8 is a
`
`perspective view of the cooling
`
`system showing the reservoir
`
`housing 14 with
`
`the heat
`
`Tube inlet
`connection
`
`Heat exchanging
`interface (below
`the device, not
`shown)
`
`exchanging surface (not shown) and the pump (not shown) inside the reservoir. The
`
`tube inlet connection and the tube outlet connection are connected to a heat radiator
`
`by means of connecting tubes 24 and 25 through which the cooling liquid flows into
`
`and out of the reservoir and the heat radiator, respectively. Within the heat radiator
`
`11, the cooling liquid passes a number of channels for radiating the heat, which has
`
`been dissipated into the cooling liquid inside the reservoir, and to the surroundings
`
`of the heat exchanger. The air fan 10 blows air past the channels of the heat radiator
`
`in order to cool the radiator and thereby cooling the cooling liquid flowing inside the
`
`4
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`channels through the heat radiator and back into the reservoir.” (Ex-1001,
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`13:28-41.)
`
`B.
`Priority Date
`The ’362 patent issued on April 7, 2020 from Application No. 12/826,768
`
`filed on June 30, 2010, claiming a priority date of November 7, 2003. Petitioner
`
`does not concede that the ’362 patent is entitled to a priority date of
`
`November 7, 2003, and reserves the right to challenge such claim of priority, but
`
`assumes that this date applies for purposes of this Petition. See PowerOasis, Inc. v.
`
`T-Mobile USA, Inc., 522 F.3d 1299, 1303-06 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (burden on patent
`
`owner to prove entitlement to priority date).
`
`C.
`The Challenged Claims
`Claims 1 and 3-19 are the Challenged Claims of the ’362 patent. Claims 1,
`
`14 and 17 are independent claims. Claims 3-13 depend from claim 1, claims 15 and
`
`16 depend from claim 14, and claims 18 and 19 depend from claim 17.
`
`IV. PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART (“POSITA”)
`A POSITA in the field of the ’362 patent at the time of the effective filing date
`
`would have been knowledgeable regarding liquid cooling systems for computer
`
`systems, would have earned at least a bachelor’s degree, such as a B.S. (bachelor of
`
`science), or equivalent thereof, in electrical or mechanical engineering or a closely-
`
`related field, or would have possessed at least two or three years of experience in
`
`liquid cooling systems for computer systems or in similar systems. A person with
`
`5
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`less education but more relevant practical experience, depending on the nature of
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`that experience and degree of exposure to liquid cooling systems for computer
`
`systems, could also qualify as a POSITA in the field of the ’362 patent. (Ex-1003,
`
`¶¶14-19.)
`
`V. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`Per 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b):
`
`“[A] claim of a patent in an IPR shall be construed using the same claim
`construction standard that would be used to construe the claim in a civil
`action under 35 U.S.C. 282(b), including construing the claim in
`accordance with the ordinary and customary meaning of such claim as
`understood by one of ordinary skill in the art and the prosecution history
`pertaining to the patent. Any prior claim construction … that is timely
`made of record in the inter partes review proceeding will be
`considered.”
`
`A.
`“reservoir”
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have stipulated to construe the term “reservoir”
`
`in the ’362 patent to mean “single receptacle defining a fluid flow path.” (Ex-1005
`
`at 2.) Petitioner submits that the claimed “reservoir” be given such construction.
`
`(Ex-1003, ¶29.)
`
`6
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`B.
`“chamber”
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have stipulated to construe the term “chamber”
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`to mean “compartment within the reservoir.” (Ex-1005 at 2.) Petitioner submits that
`
`the claimed “chambers” be given such construction. (Ex-1003, ¶30.)
`
`C.
`“impeller”
`Petitioner submits that the term “impeller” should be given its plain and
`
`ordinary meaning. An impeller is a conventional and well-known component of
`
`rotary systems. (Ex-1003, ¶31.) An impeller may refer to a rotor (e.g., a blade,
`
`turbine, or rotating arm) that is used to create a pressure difference within a fluid.
`
`(Id.) The ’362 patent describes a “pumping means with an impeller for pumping the
`
`cooling liquid through a pumping housing.” (Ex-1001 at 6:30-31.) This is consistent
`
`with the plain and ordinary meaning of “impeller.” (Ex-1003, ¶31.)
`
`D.
`“radiator”
`Petitioner submits that the term “radiator” should be given its plain and
`
`ordinary meaning. A radiator is a conventional and well-known component included
`
`in systems that require cooling. (Ex-1003, ¶32.) In its plain meaning radiators are
`
`understood by a POSITA as a system that transfers thermal energy (e.g., heat) from
`
`one medium to another medium. (Id.) This is consistent with the ’362 patent, which
`
`states that a radiator may serve “as a means for removing the heat from the liquid by
`
`means of the air fan 10 blowing air through the heat radiator.” (Ex-1001 at 8:17-19
`
`7
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`and FIG. 3.) Radiators may include structures such as pipes or fins to transfer heat.
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`(Ex-1003, ¶32.)
`
`E. Other Terms
`Petitioner does not believe any additional constructions are required at this
`
`time. Accordingly, all other terms of the ’362 patent have been given their ordinary
`
`and customary meaning in this Petition. Petitioner reserves the right to respond to
`
`claim construction positions raised by the Board or Patent Owner. (Ex-1003, ¶33.)
`
`VI. OVERVIEW OF PRIOR ART
`A.
`Batchelder (Ex-1006)
`Batchelder issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,019,165 on February 1, 2000.
`
`(Ex-1006, [11], [45].) Thus, Batchelder is prior art to the ’362 patent under at least
`
`pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §102(a) for all Challenged Claims. Batchelder was identified in
`
`an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) at the time the ’362 patent was filed (Ex-
`
`1002, 764-FH at 333); however, it was not cited by the Examiner.
`
`B.
`Shin (Ex-1007)
`Shin was filed as Japanese Patent Application 2000-345470 on November 8,
`
`2000 and published on May 24, 2002 as Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
`
`Publication No. 2002-151638 to Takayuki Shin. (Ex-1007, (21), (22), (11), (43).)
`
`Thus, Shin is entitled to an effective filing date of at least May 24, 2002. Shin is
`
`therefore prior art to the ’362 patent under at least pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. §102(a). Shin
`
`8
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`was not disclosed or cited during the prosecution of the ’362 patent. (See generally
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`Ex-1002, 362-FH.)
`
`C. Nakano (Ex-1008)
`Nakano issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,915,653 on July 12, 2005. (Ex-1008, [10],
`
`[45].) Nakano, filed on April 8, 2004, published on December 16, 2004 as U.S.
`
`Patent Publication No. 2004/0250558, qualifies as prior art under at least pre-AIA
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102(e). Nakano was not disclosed or cited during prosecution of the
`
`’362 patent. (See generally Ex-1002, 764-FH.)
`
`VII. CLAIM ELEMENT NUMBERING KEY
`Because the Challenged Claims have similar claim elements, they are
`
`numbered as follows for the element-by-element invalidity analyses of the
`
`Challenged Claims in Section VIII infra.
`
`[1-PRE]
`1. A cooling system for a
`computer system
`processing unit,
`comprising:
`
`
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-PRE]
`14. A cooling system for a
`processing unit positioned
`on a motherboard of a
`computer, comprising:
`[14-a]
`a reservoir configured to
`be coupled to the
`processing unit positioned
`
`[17-PRE]
`17. A method of operating
`a liquid cooling system for
`an electronic component
`positioned on a
`motherboard of a
`computer system,
`comprising:
`[17-a]
`
`9
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[1-a]
`an integrated element
`including a heat
`exchanging interface, a
`reservoir, and a pump,
`(Claim 1)
`[1-b]
`wherein the reservoir is
`configured to receive a
`cooling liquid from
`outside the reservoir
`through an inlet and pass
`the cooling liquid to the
`outside through an outlet,
`(Claim 1)
`See [1-f] below
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`on the motherboard at a
`first location,
`[14-b]
`the reservoir being
`adapted to pass a cooling
`liquid therethrough,
`(Claim 14)
`
`separably thermally
`coupling a heat
`exchanging interface of a
`reservoir with the
`electronic component
`positioned at a first
`location on the
`motherboard,
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`[1-c]
`the reservoir including an
`upper chamber and a
`lower chamber, the upper
`chamber and the lower
`chamber being vertically
`displaced chambers
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-c]
`wherein the reservoir
`includes an upper chamber
`and a lower chamber, the
`upper chamber and the
`lower chamber being
`separate chambers
`containing cooling liquid
`that are
`(Claim 14)
`
`[17-b]
`the reservoir including an
`upper chamber and a
`lower chamber, the upper
`chamber and the lower
`chamber being separate
`chambers that are
`vertically spaced apart
`(Claim 17)
`
`11
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[17-c]
`[the upper chamber and
`the lower chamber being
`separate chambers that are
`vertically spaced apart
`and] separated by at least
`a horizontal wall, the
`upper chamber and the
`lower chamber being
`fluidly coupled by one or
`more passageways, at least
`one of the one or more
`passageways being
`positioned on the
`horizontal wall,
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`
`[1-d]
`[the upper chamber and
`the lower chamber being
`vertically displaced
`chambers that are]
`separated from each other
`by at least a horizontal
`wall and fluidly coupled
`together by a plurality of
`substantially circular
`passages, at least one of
`the plurality of
`substantially circular
`passages being positioned
`on the horizontal wall,
`(Claim 1)
`
`See [1-e] below
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-d]
`[the upper chamber and
`the lower chamber being
`separate chambers
`containing cooling liquid
`that are] separated by at
`least a horizontal wall and
`fluidly coupled together
`by one or more
`passageways, at least one
`of the one or more
`passageways being a
`substantially circular
`passageway positioned on
`the horizontal wall,
`
`(Claim 14)
`[14-e]
`the reservoir further
`including a heat
`exchanging interface
`(Claim 14)
`
`12
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`See [1-f] below
`
`See claim 6 below
`
`[1-e]
`a boundary wall of the
`lower chamber being
`formed by the heat
`exchanging interface;
`
`
`
`
`(Claim 1)
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`
`
`[17-d]
`the heat exchanging
`interface being removably
`coupled to the reservoir
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-f]
`[a heat exchanging
`interface] configured to be
`placed in separable
`thermal contact with the
`processing unit,
`(Claim 14)
`[14-g]
`the heat exchanging
`interface being removably
`attached to the reservoir
`(Claim 14)
`[14-h]
`[the heat exchanging
`interface being removably
`attached to the reservoir]
`such that the heat
`exchanging interface
`forms a boundary wall of
`the lower chamber of the
`reservoir;
`(Claim 14)
`
`13
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`See [14-f] above
`
`
`
`[1-f]
`the heat exchanging
`interface is adapted to
`provide separable thermal
`contact between the
`processing unit and the
`cooling liquid such that
`heat is dissipated from the
`processing unit to the
`cooling liquid as the
`cooling liquid passes
`through the lower
`chamber of the reservoir;
`and
`(Claim 1)
`
`14
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[1-g]
`the pump is adapted to
`direct the cooling liquid
`through the upper
`chamber and the lower
`chamber of the reservoir,
`the pump including a
`motor having a rotor, a
`stator and an impeller
`having a plurality of
`curved blades, the
`impeller being positioned
`within the reservoir;
`(Claim 1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`
`
`
`[17-e]
`[the heat exchanging
`interface being removably
`coupled to the reservoir
`such that] an inside
`surface of the heat
`exchanging interface is
`exposed to the lower
`chamber of the reservoir;
`(Claim 17)
`
`15
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[17-f]
`positioning a heat radiator
`at a second location
`horizontally spaced apart
`from the first location, the
`heat radiator and the
`reservoir being fluidly
`coupled together by tubing
`that extends from the first
`location to the second
`location;
`
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`[1-h]
`a heat radiator spaced
`apart from the integrated
`element, the heat radiator
`being fluidly coupled to
`the outlet and the inlet of
`the reservoir, the heat
`radiator being configured
`to circulate the cooling
`liquid therethrough and
`exhaust heat from the
`cooling liquid; and
`(Claim 1)
`[1-i]
`a fan configured to direct
`air through the heat
`radiator, the fan being
`driven by a motor separate
`from the motor of the
`pump.
`(Claim 1)
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-i]
`a heat radiator configured
`to be positioned at a
`second location
`horizontally spaced apart
`from the first location
`when the reservoir is
`coupled to the processing
`unit;
`
`
`
`(Claim 14)
`[14-j]
`a fan adapted to direct air
`to the heat radiator to
`dissipate heat from the
`cooling liquid to
`surrounding atmosphere;
`
`(Claim 14)
`
`16
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`See [1-g] above
`
`
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[17-g]
`activating a pump to a
`circulate a cooling liquid
`through the reservoir and
`the heat radiator, the pump
`including a motor and an
`impeller having curved
`blades, the impeller being
`positioned in the reservoir;
`and
`
`
`
`
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`[14-k]
`a pump configured to
`circulate the cooling liquid
`between the reservoir and
`the heat radiator, the pump
`including a motor having a
`rotor, a stator, and an
`impeller having curved
`blades, the impeller being
`mechanically coupled to
`the rotor and at least
`partially submerged in the
`cooling liquid in the
`reservoir,
`(Claim 14)
`[14-l]
`wherein a speed of the
`impeller is configured to
`be varied independent of
`the speed of the fan.
`(Claim 14)
`
`17
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`See [1-i] above
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`See [14-j] above
`
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`[17-h]
`activating a fan to direct
`air through the heat
`radiator, the fan being
`operated by a motor
`separate from the motor of
`the pump.
`(Claim 17)
`
`
`
`
`3. The cooling system of
`claim 1, further including
`a plurality of channels in
`the lower chamber of the
`reservoir.
`(Claim 3)
`
`4. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the pump
`is positioned in the upper
`chamber of the reservoir.
`(Claim 4)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`
`5. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the
`cooling liquid is
`transferred between the
`upper chamber and the
`lower chamber of the
`reservoir only through the
`plurality of passages that
`fluidly couple the upper
`chamber and the lower
`chamber.
`(Claim 5)
`
`6. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the heat
`exchanging interface is
`removably coupled to the
`reservoir.
`(Claim 6)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`
`7. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein a surface
`of the heat exchanging
`interface exposed to the
`lower chamber includes
`features to enhance heat
`dissipation.
`(Claim 7)
`
`8. The cooling system of
`claim 7, wherein the
`plurality of passages
`includes only two
`passages.
`(Claim 8)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,240,362
`IPR2023-00667
`
`
`
`Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review
`
`9. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the lower
`chamber of the reservoir
`includes one or more
`features that are
`configured to increase an
`amount of time the
`cooling liquid takes to
`flow through the lower
`chamber.
`(Claim 9)
`
`10. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the
`motor of the pump is an
`AC motor.
`(Claim 10)
`
`11. The cooling system of
`claim 1, wherein the
`motor of the pump is a DC
`motor.
`(Claim 11)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`’362 Claim Limitations
`15. The cooling system of
`claim 14, wherein the
`lower chamber of the
`reservoir includes one or
`more features that are
`configured to increase an
`amount of time the
`cooling liquid takes