throbber
3GPP TSG-RAN2#99bis
`Pargue, Czech Republic, 9th – 13th, October 2017
`
`10.4.1.6.4
`Agenda Item:
`OPPO
`Source:
`Discussion on NR SI Modification
`Title:
`Document for: Discussion and Decision
`
` R2-1710181
`
`1 Introduction
`In NR system, the SI messages are divided into two groups, one is named as Minimum SI which is
`periodically broadcast and comprises of basic information required for initial access and information for ther SI
`scheduling. The other one is named as Other SI which includes everything not broadcast in the Minimum SI
`and may either be broadcast or triggered upon network or the request from the UE [1].
`However, in previous meeting, what’s the behavior of network and UE has not been discussed when the SI is
`changed. Therefore, in this contribution, we discuss both Minimums SI modification and Other SI modification
`respectively, and subsequently provide our proposals.
`
`2 Discussion
`2.1 Modification Period
`In LTE, when the network changes (some of the) system information, it first notifies the UEs about this
`change, i.e. this may be done throughout a modification period. In the next modification period, the network
`transmits the updated system information as indicated in Figure 1. This general principle is applied to almost
`all SI message in LTE.
`
`Change notification
`
`Updated information
`
`BCCH modification period (n)
`
`BCCH modification period (n+1)
`
`
`
`Figure 1. Change of System Information
`In NR, the SI message including both Minimum SI and Other SI can still follow the same LTE principle, which
`is that the change notification will be sent through modification period n, while the new system information will
`be updated in modification period n+1, because both types of SI require the UE who are interested in the
`information getting the notification before the system information really changes.
`Proposal 1 NR can take the modification period concept in LTE as the baseline for NR SI Change.
`2.2 Change Notification
`In LTE, the systemInfoModification included in the Paging message is used to notify the UE in RRC_IDLE and
`UEs in RRC_CONNECTED about the system information change. When the UE gets the change notification
`i.e. systemInfoModification in Paging message, it will understand that there is some modification on the stored
`system information without knowing exactly which one is changed. In this case, the UE has to either update all
`the system information, or at least acquire the MIB information to determine whether to update the system
`information accordingly if the UE is eMTC or NB-IoT UE. Obviously, this is not efficient from UE power
`consumption perspective.
`
`R2-170xxxx
`
`1/3
`
`
`
` Ex. 1015
`APPLE INC. / Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`In NR, the Minimum SI will be defined as two parts, i.e. Minimum SI transmitted in PBCH (i.e. MSI defined in
`RAN1, and similar like MIB in LTE) as well as Minimum SI transmitted via PDSCH (i.e. RMSI defined in
`RAN1, and similar like SIB1 and SIB2 in LTE).
`The Minimum SI contained in PBCH will be always transmitted with using specific resource defined by
`physical layer, and based on previous discussions and agreements about the contents of PBCH in RAN1 [2],
`the information contained in PBCH including the configuration of RMSI scheduling information may be quite
`static, therefore, there is no change notification needed for the Minimum SI contained in PBCH.
`Proposal 2 No need to add change notification in Paging message for Minimum SI contained in
`PBCH.
`The Minimum SI contained in PDSCH i.e. SIB1 (and SIB2 if defined) discussed in RAN2 will contain rest of
`the Minimum SI related to initial access and Other SI scheduling. The information here will change more
`frequent than that contained in PBCH. If UE could know exactly whether the Minimum SI contained in PDSCH
`is changed or not, the UE power as well as the SI acquisition time could be optimized, therefore,
`Proposal 3 The change notification for the Minimum SI contained in PDSCH i.e. SIB1 (and SIB2 if
`defined) should be added in Paging message.
`For Other SI message, since they are interested by specific UEs, it’s better for the UE to understand well
`which Other SI is changed, in this case, those UEs who are not interested in the SI message could skip the SI
`update, therefore, the UE power consumption could be saved.
`Proposal 4 For Other SI, the SI specific/per-SIB change notification should be introduced in Paging
`message.
`2.3 Value Tag
`In current LTE system, in addition to the change notification provided in Paging, a value tag i.e.
`systemInfoValueTag is also included in SIB1 to indicate if a change has occurred in the SI messages. UEs
`may use systemInfoValueTag, e.g. upon return from out of coverage, to verify if the previously stored SI
`messages are still valid. And in LTE enhancements for eMTC and NB-IoT, the value tag has been enhanced
`to identify specific SI changed. Moreover, in LTE, the SIBs other than MIB,SIB1, SIB10/11/12/14 share the
`same SystemInfoValueTag. We think this may not be suitable for NR because Other SIs may be
`independently broadcasted. If all the SIs in Other SI shares just one SystemInfoValueTag, then each SIB
`change will cause the UE to acquire all the SIBs. Considering all the above aspects, we propose that in
`stage-3 work, RAN2 could define SystemInfoValueTag per SIB, or per SI message or per SIB group. Here,
`SIB group means certain SIBs which may appear together which may be relevant for one function like cell
`selection reselection or one service like V2X, D2D etc.
`Proposal 5 For NR, RAN2 should discuss whether value tag can be per-SIB or per-SI message or
`per-SIB group.
`For per-SIB value tag, as the change notification discussed in Section 2.2, the per-SIB value tag for RMSI and
`Other SI should be supported.
`Proposal 6 The per-SIB value tag for RMSI (at least SIB2 is RAN2 agrees RMSI contains SIB1 and
`SIB2) and Other SI can be supported.
`In the last meeting discussion, it was agreed that no value tag/area related info will be included in MIB.
`Therefore, the value tag will be included in SIB1 which is aligned with LTE.
`Proposal 7 The value tag should be included in SIB1.
`2.4 Behavior of Network and UE when SI is changed
`When the one SI is changed, including the Minimum SI contained in PDSCH and Other SI, the UE will receive
`the paging message with change notification for that SI. After the reception of the notification, the UE will
`understand which SI is changed. If the UE is interested in that SI, the UE will update the SI with the
`
`R2-170xxxx
`
`2/3
`
`
`
` Ex. 1015
`APPLE INC. / Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`scheduling information stored; while if the UE is not interested in that SI, the UE will just skip the change
`notification.
`No matter the updated SI belongs to Minimum SI or Other SI, no request is supposed to be transmitted from
`UE. The network should transmitted the updated SI message after the modification boundary at least for a
`defined period.
`Proposal 8 When the SI is changed, no SI request needs to be sent from UE, and network will send
`the updated SI after the modification boundary at least for a period defined.
`
`3 Conclusions:
`In this contribution, we discuss both Minimums SI modification and Other SI modification respectively, and
`subsequently provide our proposals as follows:
`Proposal 1 NR can take the modification period concept in LTE as the baseline for NR SI Change.
`Proposal 2 No need to add change notification in Paging message for Minimum SI contained in
`PBCH.
`Proposal 3 The change notification for the Minimum SI contained in PDSCH i.e. SIB1 (and SIB2 if
`defined) should be added in Paging message.
`Proposal 4 For Other SI, the SI specific change notification should be introduced in Paging
`message.
`Proposal 5 For NR, RAN2 should discuss whether SystemValueTag can be per-SIB or per-SI
`message or per-SIB group.
`Proposal 6 The per-SIB value tag for RMSI (at least SIB2 is RAN2 agrees RMSI contains SIB1 and
`SIB2) and Other SI can be supported.
`Proposal 7 The value tag should be included in SIB1.
`Proposal 8 When the SI is changed, no SI request needs to be sent from UE, and network will send
`the updated SI after the modification boundary at least for a period defined.
`
`4 References:
`[1]. TS 38.300, NR and NG-RAN Overall Description, Stage 2;
`[2]. R2-1706304, LS on NR-PBCH content (R1-1709789; contact: Ericsson), RAN1.
`
`R2-170xxxx
`
`3/3
`
`
`
` Ex. 1015
`APPLE INC. / Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket