`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ORCKIT CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent No. 10,652,111
`
`DECLARATION OF GEORGE
`STAMATOPOULOS IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`VICE ADMISSION
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2022
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`I, George Stamatopoulos, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest
`
`to the following:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member of good standing with the State Bar of New York
`
`(2013).
`
`2.
`
`I am an attorney at Kobre & Kim LLP. I am an experienced patent
`
`litigation attorney with more than ten years of experience. In that time, I have
`
`served as counsel in numerous patent infringement suits before the U.S. District
`
`Courts for the Eastern District of Virginia, Eastern District of Texas, Central
`
`District of California and District of Delaware and am admitted to practice in the
`
`U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Texas, Eastern District of New
`
`York, and Southern District of New York.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed on
`
`me from any court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of title 37
`
`of the Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`7.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2022
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq., and disciplinary jurisdiction under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I have not applied to appear pro hac vice in any matter before the
`
`Board within the last three years.
`
`9.
`
`Orckit Corporation’s lead counsel in this proceeding, Mr. James
`
`T. Carmichael, is a Partner at Carmichael IP, PLLC, and is a registered
`
`practitioner experienced in proceedings before the USPTO.
`
`10.
`
`I have worked with lead counsel and am familiar with the subject
`
`matter at issue in this proceeding. As such, I have reviewed and am very
`
`familiar with (i) U.S. Patent No. 10,652,111 (the “’111 patent”), the patent-at-
`
`issue in this proceeding, (ii) the prior art relied upon in Petitioner’s Petition,
`
`(iii) the legal and factual arguments that have been addressed by Patent Owner,
`
`and (iv) the developments in this proceeding since the filing of Petitioner’s
`
`Petition. I was counsel for Orckit Corporation. in the related district court case,
`
`Orckit Corporation. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00276-JRG-RSP (E.D.
`
`Tex.) (dismissed without prejudice on September 22, 2023), in which Orckit
`
`Corporation. had asserted the ’111 patent against Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2022
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both. (See 18 U.S.C. §1001.)
`
`Dated: October 4, 2023
`
` /s/ George Stamatopoulos
` George Stamatopoulos
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2022
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 4 of 4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
