throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`-vs-
`
`ORCKIT CORPORATION,
`
`Patent Owner
`____________________________
`
`Case No. IPR2023-00554
`U.S. Patent No. 10,652,111
`
`PETITIONER'S DEMONSTRATIVES
`PTAB ORAL ARGUMENT
`July 9, 2024
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`

`

`The ’111 Patent Relates to Deep
`Packet Inspection (DPI) in Software
`Defined Networks (SDN)
`
`EX1001, Col. 1:14-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`2
`
`

`

`Figure 1 of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`3
`
`EX1001, Figure 1
`
`

`

`Figure 2 of the ’111 Patent
`
`EX1001, Figure 2
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`4
`
`

`

`Figure 3 of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, Figure 3
`
`5
`
`

`

`Figure 4 of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, Figure 4
`
`6
`
`

`

`Figure 6 of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, Figure 6
`
`7
`
`

`

`Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)
`Was Known
`
`EX1001, Col. 1:20-25
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`8
`
`

`

`Software Defined Networking
`(SDN) Was Known
`
`EX1001, Col. 1:30-33
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`9
`
`

`

`Background on SDN and
`Open Flow Protocol
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`10
`
`EX1001, Col. 1:39-67
`
`

`

`Embodiments of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, Col. 2:27-47
`
`11
`
`

`

`The Central Controller Performs
`Deep Packet Inspection
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`12
`
`EX1001, Col. 4:5-19
`
`

`

`The Operation of the
`Probe Flow Module
`
`EX1001, Col. 5:50-59
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`13
`
`

`

`Claim 1 of the ’111 Patent
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1001, Cols. 10:51-11:4
`
`14
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses SDN
`
`EX1005, Col. 1:8-9
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`15
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Flow of Packets
`Through The SDN Switch
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`16
`
`EX1004, ¶76
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Flow of Packets
`Through The SDN Switch
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`17
`
`EX1004, ¶76
`
`

`

`The Packets Travel From The Sender
`Through The SDN Switch To The Next Hop
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1004, ¶102
`
`18
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Claimed Network Node
`And First And Second Entities
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1004, ¶77
`
`19
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Claimed Controller
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`20
`
`EX1004, ¶78
`
`

`

`Lin Teaches That SDN “Separates The
`Control Plane From The Data Plane”
`
`EX1005, Col. 1:10-17
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`21
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Use Of The
`OpenFlow Protocol
`
`EX1005, Col. 1:18-22
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`22
`
`

`

`Lin’s Controller And Switch Can
`Utilize The OpenFlow Protocol
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`23
`
`EX1004, ¶186
`
`

`

`Lin’s Controller Determines Flow
`Policies That Contain “A Condition And
`Corresponding Action To Be Performed”
`
`EX1005, Col. 1:39-43
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`24
`
`

`

`Lin Utilizes An SDN Controller To
`Insert Flow Rules In A Flow Table Of
`The SDN Switch
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, Col. 1:57-2:4
`
`25
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses The Use Of DPI
`
`EX1005, Col. 3:11-14
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`26
`
`

`

`Lin Discloses Packets Sent
`To A Security Service
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`27
`
`EX1005, Col. 3:25-33
`
`

`

`Lin’s Controller And Switch Can Use
`The OpenFlow Protocol
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`28
`
`EX1005, Col. 3:44-52
`
`

`

`Lin’s SDN Controller Controls
`Network Behavior
`
`EX1005, Col. 4:8-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`29
`
`

`

`Lin’s Flow Policies Are Enforced
`Through Flow Rules
`
`EX1005, Col. 4:21-27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`30
`
`

`

`Lin’s Flow Rules Are
`Located In Flow Tables
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`31
`
`EX1005, Col. 4:53-65
`
`

`

`The Structure Of Lin’s Flow Tables
`
`EX1005, Col. 5:8-10
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`32
`
`

`

`Lin Utilizes The IP Source And
`Destination Addresses
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`33
`
`EX1005, Col. 5:15-25
`
`

`

`Lin Forms An SDN Pipe Between
`The Sender Component And The
`Security Service
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, Col. 5:26-36
`
`34
`
`

`

`Lin’s Security Service Inspects Packets
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`35
`
`EX1005, Col. 5:45-55
`
`

`

`Lin’s Security Service Is
`Connected To The SDN Switch
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`36
`
`EX1005, Col. 5:56-67
`
`

`

`Lin’s Flow Rules Allow Redirection
`Of Packets To The Security Service
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, Col. 6:1-12
`
`37
`
`

`

`Lin’s Security Service May Drop Packets
`Or Perform Other Security Services
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`38
`
`EX1005, Col. 6:49-57
`
`

`

`Lin May Mirror Packets To
`The Security Service
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`39
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:9-19
`
`

`

`Lin Allows Packets To Pass Through The
`SDN Switch If They Do Not Need
`Inspection
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:23-27
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`40
`
`

`

`Table 2 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`41
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:30-37
`
`

`

`Lin’s Bypass Rules
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`42
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:39-50
`
`

`

`Lin Chooses Which Packets To
`Redirect To The Security Service
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`43
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:51-63
`
`

`

`Lin Inspects Certain Packets While
`Allowing Other Packets To Bypass
`Inspection
`
`EX1005, Col. 7:64-67
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`44
`
`

`

`Table 3 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`45
`
`EX1005, Col. 8:1-8
`EX1004, ¶92
`
`

`

`The Operation Of Table 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`46
`
`EX1005, Col. 8:10-18
`
`

`

`Lin’s Bypass Flow Rules
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`47
`
`EX1005, Col. 9:10-21
`
`

`

`Figure 2 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`48
`
`EX1005, Figure 2
`
`

`

`Figure 3 of Lin
`
`EX1005, Figure 3
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`49
`
`

`

`Figure 4 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`50
`
`EX1005, Figure 4
`
`

`

`Figure 7 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, Figure 7
`
`51
`
`

`

`Figure 8 of Lin
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1005, Figure 8
`
`52
`
`

`

`Shieh Relates To Network Security
`
`EX1006, ¶[0002]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`53
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses A Client And A Server
`Communicating Through The
`Network Access Device
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`54
`
`EX1004, ¶234
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses Packets Flowing
`Through A Network Access Device
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`55
`
`EX1004, ¶209
`
`

`

`Shieh’s Network Access Devices Are
`The Claimed Network Nodes
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`56
`
`EX1004, ¶210
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses The Claimed Controller
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`57
`
`EX1004, ¶211, ¶216
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses A Flexible Security System
`That Optimizes The Use Of Resources
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`58
`
`EX1006, ¶[0003]
`
`

`

`Shieh Performs Dynamic Security
`Inspection On Network Packets
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`59
`
`EX1006, ¶[0017]
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses That A Command From An
`Administrator Can Control How Packets
`Are Forwarded
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`60
`
`EX1006, ¶[0017]
`
`

`

`Shieh’s Controller Configures A Network
`Access Device To Set Up Filtering Rules
`
`EX1006, ¶[0018]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`61
`
`

`

`Shieh’s Network Access Device Can Forward
`Certain Packets To A Security Device
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`62
`
`EX1006, ¶[0018]
`
`

`

`Shieh’s System Operates On
`Switches Or Routers
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`63
`
`EX1006, ¶[0019]
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses DPI
`
`EX1006, ¶[0021]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`64
`
`

`

`Shieh Can Utilize A Session Table To Store
`Rules Used To Decide What Packets Are
`Sent To A Security Processing Function
`
`EX1006, ¶[0023]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`65
`
`

`

`Shieh Can Utilize A Session Table To Store
`Rules Used To Decide What Packets Are
`Sent To A Security Processing Function
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`66
`
`EX1006, ¶[0023]
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses A Persistent Connection
`Between Its Controllers And Its Network
`Access Devices
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, ¶[0025]
`
`67
`
`

`

`Shieh Can Utilize OpenFlow Technology
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, ¶[0026]
`
`68
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses That An Administrator
`Configures The Network Access Devices
`Via A Controller
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, ¶[0029]
`
`69
`
`

`

`Shieh Discloses That Security Inspection
`Can Be Bypassed For Certain Packets
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, ¶[0035]
`
`70
`
`

`

`The Use Of Shieh’s Bypass Flag
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, ¶[0037]
`
`71
`
`

`

`Shieh’s Disclosure Of Load Balancing
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`72
`
`EX1006, ¶[0039]
`
`

`

`Shieh’s Controller Has “Central Control
`And Monitoring Functionality”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`73
`
`EX1006, ¶[0043]
`
`

`

`Shieh – Claim 1
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, Claim 1
`
`74
`
`

`

`Figure 2B of Shieh
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, Figure 2B
`
`75
`
`

`

`Figure 3 of Shieh
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, Figure 3
`
`76
`
`

`

`Figure 5 of Shieh
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1006, Figure 5
`
`77
`
`

`

`Figure 8 of Shieh
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`78
`
`EX1006, Figure 8
`
`

`

`Swenson Teaches “Real-Time Traffic
`Monitoring” Using A Network Controller
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`79
`
`EX1007, ¶[0023]
`
`

`

`Swenson Discloses A System That
`Maximizes Available Bandwidth
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`80
`
`EX1007, ¶[0018]
`
`

`

`Figure 1 of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`81
`
`EX1007, Figure 1
`
`

`

`Figure 3 of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`82
`
`EX1007, Figure 3
`
`

`

`Figure 4A of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`83
`
`EX1007, Figure 4A
`
`

`

`Figure 4B of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1007, Figure 4B
`
`84
`
`

`

`Figure 5 of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`85
`
`EX1007, Figure 5
`
`

`

`Figure 7 of Swenson
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1007, Figure 7
`
`86
`
`

`

`Swenson Categorizes Network Traffic,
`Including HTTP Traffic Flows
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1007, ¶[0026]
`
`87
`
`

`

`Swenson’s Controller Is Out-Of-Band And
`Inspects Network Packets For Traffic
`Monitoring And Optimization
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`88
`
`EX1007, ¶[0028]
`
`

`

`Swenson Teaches That Network Packets
`Are Sent To The Controller For
`“Inspection”
`
`EX1007, ¶[0029]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`89
`
`

`

`Swenson Discloses That Its System
`Performs “Security Functions”
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`90
`
`EX1007, ¶[0039]
`
`

`

`Swenson Provides “On-Demand Real-
`Time Network Monitoring”
`
`EX1007, ¶[0056]
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`91
`
`

`

`Swenson Performs DPI
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1007, ¶[0059]
`
`92
`
`

`

`Swenson Discloses That Its System
`Performs Inspection Of Network Packets
`
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT - NOT EVIDENCE
`
`EX1007, ¶[0060]
`
`93
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket