throbber
Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent 10,652,111
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ORCKIT CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2023-005541
`U.S. Patent No. 10,652,111
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED LIST OF EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`1 IPR2024-0037 (Juniper Networks, Inc. has been joined with this
`proceeding).
`
`

`

`Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent 10,652,111
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`2001 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 46 (E.D. Tex., Jan. 15, 2023), First Amended Docket Control Order
`(“First Amended Docket Control Order”)
`2002 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 28 (E.D. Tex., Nov. 4, 2022), Notice of Compliance (“11-4-2022
`Notice of Compliance”)
`2003 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 47 (E.D. Tex., Jan. 19, 2023), Notice of Compliance (“1-19-2023
`Notice of Compliance”)
`2004 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 55 (E.D. Tex., Mar. 23, 2023), Defendant’s Motion To Stay
`2005 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 56 (E.D. Tex., Mar. 29, 2023), Order Denying Motion to Stay
`2006 United States District Courts National Judicial Caseload Profile For the
`12 Months Ending March 31, 2023 (available at
`https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/data_tables/fcms_na_distprof
`ile0331.2023.pdf) (“Judicial Caseload Statistics”)
`2007 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 50 (E.D. Tex., Feb. 3, 2023), Notice of Compliance (“2-3-2023
`Notice of Compliance”)
`2008 Reserved
`
`2010
`
`2009 December 11, 2008 Final Rejection (U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,801) (“’801
`Application Final Rejection”)
`July 28, 2008 Claim Amendments (U.S. Appl. No. 11/123,801) (“’801
`Application Pending Claims”)
`2011 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 59 (E.D. Tex., Mar. 30, 2023), Order Granting Motion To Amend
`Invalidity Contentions
`2012 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, Dkt.
`No. 61 (E.D. Tex., April 13, 2023), Order Granting Motion To Amend
`Invalidity Contentions
`“About Orckit-Corrigent: Executive Summary,” 2011
`
`2013
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent 10,652,111
`
`2014 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Cover Pleading)
`2015 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Exhibit A - ’904 Patent Charts)
`2016 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Exhibit B - ’821 Patent Charts)
`2017 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Exhibit C - ’740 Patent Charts)
`2018 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Exhibit D - ’111 Patent Charts)
`2019 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(Exhibit E - Combination Charts)
`2020 Orckit Corporation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-00276, (E.D.
`Tex., April 13, 2023), Defendant’s First Amended Invalidity Contentions
`(SME Contentions)
`2021 United States District Courts National Judicial Caseload Profile For the
`12 Months Ending December 31, 2022 (available at
`https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/data_tables/fcms_na_distprof
`ile1231.2022.pdf) (“December 22 Judicial Caseload Statistics”)
`2022 Declaration of George Stamatopoulos in support of Patent Owner’s
`Motion for Pro Hac Vic Admission
`2023 Declaration of Michael Ng in support of Patent Owner’s Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission
`2024 Stipulation of Dismissal
`
`2025 Declaration of Miguel Gomez
`
`2026 CV of Miguel Gomez
`
`2027
`
`“DPI & DFI: A Malicious Behavior Detection Method Combining Deep
`Packet Inspection and Deep Flow Inspection” by Guo et al., Procedia
`Engineering 174, 1309-1314 (2017)
`2028 Patent Owner Demonstratives
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent 10,652,111
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 3, 2024 Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Minghui Yang/
`Minghui Yang
`Reg. No. 71,989
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`CARMICHAEL IP, PLLC
`8607 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 270
`Tysons, VA 22182
`Email: mitch@carmichaelip.com
`Telephone: (703) 646-9248
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Case IPR2023-00554
`Patent 10,652,111
`
`
`I hereby certify that on July 3, 2024, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED LIST OF EXHIBITS to be served
`
`on the following counsel of record for Petitioner by electronic mail to the following
`
`addresses:
`
`Jeffrey D. Blake
`
`
`
`jblake@merchantgould.com
`
`OrckitIPR@merchantgould.com
`
`
`
`Kyle K. Tsui
`
`
`
`kyle.tsui@fischllp.com
`
`Andrew L. Ramos
`
`Andrew.ramos@fischllp.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Minghui Yang/
`
`
`
`Date: July 3, 2024
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket