`
`2178 Sirah Ct., Livermore CA 94550
`miguel@rockslideanalytics.com
`ph. 415.793.4103
`
`Mr. Gomez has thirty five years of experience in the design and development of hardware and software
`technology used in telecommunications, data communications, networking and storage infrastructure. He
`also is highly skilled in the use of microelectronics simulation software, ASIC & FPGA coding and
`Verilog. Mr. Gomez has designed and coded digital switching, optical encoders, and semiconductor
`memory hardware and software.
`
`Expertise
`
`§ ASIC & FPGA Design
`§ Computer Architecture
`§ Computer Buses, Cache, and I/O
`§ Hardware Emulators
`§ Hardware Programming Languages
`§ Hardware Verification & Test
`§
`Software Programming Languages
`§ Network Protocols
`§ Telecom Protocols
`§
`Storage, Raid Controllers
`§ Digital Switching Technology
`
`Consulting Areas
`
`Computer Architectures
`§ Data General
`§
`IBM PC
`§ MIP 3000, 4000
`§
`Intel 8051, x86, Pentium II
`§ Motorola 68000
`§ TI TMS320Cxx (DSP)
`§
`PowerPC
`
`§
`
`Computer Buses:
`§ USB
`§
`I2C
`PCI
`§
`ISA
`§ EISA
`§
`PCMCIA
`§
`SBUS
`§ VME
`§
`S100
`
`§ Modems
`§
`Security in place, security in motion
`§ Compression Algorithms,
`§ Optical Encoders
`§ Video Capture and Display Systems
`§
`Semiconductor Memories
`Power supply design
`§
`Power Inverter design.
`§ Computer Vision
`
`§
`
`Hardware Programming Languages:
`§
`PALASM
`§ ABEL
`§ AHDL
`§ VHDL
`§ Verilog
`
`Hardware Simulation and Compilation
`§
`Synopsys VCD
`§
`Synplicity
`§ ModelSim
`§ VerilogNC
`§
`Spice, Hspice
`
`ASIC and FPGA Design:
`§ Actel
`§ Altera
`§ Xilinx
`
`Page 1 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 1 of 25
`
`
`
`CAD Tools
`§ Max+Plus II, Quartus (Altera)
`§ XACT, ISE (Xilinx)
`§ Mentor
`§ Orcad
`§ Allegro
`§ Viewlogic
`
`§
`
`§
`
`Schema
`P-Cad
`
`Hardware Emulators
`§ Quickturn
`§
`Ikos
`§ Zycad
`
`Computer Memories
`§
`SDRAM
`§ Rambus
`§ DDR I,II
`§
`SDR
`
`Compression:
`§ ADPCM
`
`§ H.264
`
`Networking Protocols:
`§ ATM
`§ TCP/IP
`§ Ethernet
`§ VOIP
`§ HTTP/HTML
`§
`SIP/SDP
`
`Software Programming Languages:
`§ C,C++
`§ BASIC, VISUAL BASIC
`§ Assembly and Machine Languages
`§
`FORTRAN
`Java
`Pascal
`Python/Django/bootstrap
`
`§
`
`§
`
`§
`
`Operating Systems:
`§ MSDOS
`§ Windows 3.1/NT/9x/2000/XP/CE
`§ UNIX
`
`Communications
`§
`Spread Spectrum (802.11a,b,g,n)
`§ LTE
`§ ODFM
`§ RF Transmission and reception
`§ CDMA/GSM
`
`Power Electronics
`§
`Solar Inverters
`3-phase motors
`
`§
`
`Education
`
`College or University
`Year
` 1983 Yale University
`
`Degree
`BSEE
`
`Page 2 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 2 of 25
`
`
`
`Engineering Experience
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`April 2013
`Present
`Rockslide Analytics, LLC.
`CEO
`Mr. Gomez founded Rockslide Analytics in order to develop and eventually sell a
`depth sensing camera. A depth sensing camera can image a scene in three
`dimensions. Currently Rockslide Analytics is also used to promote Mr. Gomez's
`consulting and expert work.
`
`August 2006
`March 30, 2009
`ActSolar Inc.
`VP Engineering and System Architect
`Mr. Gomez has designed and built a 400 watt power inverter which takes an input
`voltage of 30 volts DC and converts it to 240 VAC. Included in the design is an
`energy compensation circuit that recovers up to 40% of power normally lost due to
`power factor correction issues. Included as part of the inverter system was rooftop
`data collection for power and temperature with wireless connections to cloud
`management services.
`
`ActSolar was sold to National Semiconductor Corp. on March 19, 2009.
`
`September 2004
`August 2005
`BridgeWave Inc.
`Consultant
`Mr. Gomez built a 10 gig Ethernet test platform to facilitate manufacturing tests of
`Bridgewave’s high speed wireless network system. This system replaced the Smart
`Bits Ethernet test analyzer in the manufacturing test environment.
`• Built test generator: Ethernet packet generator which generated packets of
`various sizes, address spaces, payload and checksums.
`• Built test receiver and analyzer which detected various failure mechanisms,
`maintained statistics and reported them to a user interface written in Lab
`View.
`• Used the Xilinx Vertex II in the 2003 version. Used Xilinx Spartan 3e in
`2004 version.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`
`September 2004
`September 2004
`PA Consulting Group
`Consultant
`
`Page 3 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 3 of 25
`
`
`
`Summary:
`
`Miguel Gomez has provided hardware evaluation services for corporate mergers and
`acquisitions. These services include systems and hardware reviews in the following
`areas:
`• Analysis of system performance to cost of the hardware implementation.
`Costs include development time, flexibility of the system for future growth
`and final product costs.
`• Review of the VHDL and Verilog code implementations, documentation and
`development strategies.
`• VHDL and Verilog code management including compilation processes,
`simulation, test coverage, bug tracking and source code control.
`FPGA and ASIC tool chain management.
`• Circuit board design and layout for production environments
`• Circuit board certification testing for FCC, UL, and Environmental tests
`• Review of production line management including assembly and test
`processes.
`
`•
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`Jan 2003
`May 2003
`Santel Networks
`Consultant
`Mr. Gomez Developed an optical duo-binary (ODB) encoder. At 10.7 Giga bits per
`second (GBps) ODB reduces the spectral spread to ½ of the ordinary NRZ format.
`This format allows high spectral efficiency over long distances by reducing nonlinear
`penalties due to narrower channel spacing and allows a higher bit rate or increases
`transmission distances. The project was implemented in a Xilinx FPGA running at
`667 Mbs with a 10.7 GHz Mux/Demux feeding 16 LVDS streams to the FPGA. The
`ODB behavior was simulated in a C-coded simulation. The circuit board’s highest
`clock speed was 10.7 Gigahertz and was modeled in HSPICE. Board level simulation
`was performed using NCVerilog. Several Patents were applied for and the board was
`shown at the Optical Fiber Communication Conference & Exposition in March of
`2003.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`March 2001
`December 2002
`Extreme Networks, Inc.
`Director of Hardware, Content Networking Division
`Mr. Gomez managed a team of Hardware and Software engineers, which developed
`and maintained a Layer 5 Content Addressable Switch. The switch is capable of L2,
`L3, L4 switching as well as L5 switching which uses HTTP headers to make routing
`decisions. All routing decisions were made in real time (1 GBPs) by hardware in
`FPGAs while a Power PC provided a user interface, configuration management and
`housekeeping diagnostics. Communications between the hardware elements and the
`PowerPC CPU was via a PCI bus.
`
`January 2000
`From:
`March 2001
`To:
`Organization: Webstacks, Inc. (Now Extreme Networks, Inc.)
`
`Page 4 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 4 of 25
`
`
`
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`Director of Hardware
`Extreme Networks and several venture founding partners commissioned Webstacks to
`build a Content Addressable Switch. As the number four employee Mr. Gomez was
`hired to be the system architect and to in-turn to hire the hardware team which would
`implement it. He hired 13 ASIC, FPGA and software engineers into his department
`and managed them for the duration of the project. Time to development was one year
`and at that time functionality was proven to Extreme, which then bought Webstacks for
`$68MM cash and stock.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`February 1997
`December 1999
`Philips Semiconductor
`Consultant
`§ Developed the certification environment which was used by Philips
`Semiconductor and Microsoft to verify operation of Philips’ Poseidon handheld
`chipset running Windows CE. This included board development, FPGA coding
`and simulation as well as porting Windows CE.
`Supported development of Philip’s version of the Mips 4000 along with several
`of the peripheral devices that made up the system on a chip and the bus
`interconnect.
`§ Miguel Gomez also developed the ASIC logic and board level hardware for a
`56Kbs software modem while at Philips.
`
`§
`
`September 1994
`From:
`January 1997
`To:
`Organization: Minden Group, Inc.
`Title:
`President & Founder
`Summary:
`After founding The Minden Group, Miguel Gomez developed several types of
`memory adapters used to adapt various sizes and types of memory sticks into Personal
`Computers. These were sold through retail stores throughout the nation. Over
`250,000 memory adapters were sold at stores such as Fry’s, CompUSA, Computer
`City and Future Shop. Miguel Gomez also designed a video conferencing system
`including a low cost video capture board and modified drivers. This system was also
`sold through the retail channels.
`After developing these products he organized and managed a small team of 10 to 15
`product managers and sales personal. Manufacturing was done in Taiwan with final
`assembly and distribution in the United States.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`April 1989
`August 1994
`Spectrum Analysis, Inc.
`Founder & President
`Consulting services company which Mr. Gomez founded specializing in computing,
`telephony and data systems. The company was a full service design firm capable of
`electrical circuit design with emphasis on ASIC, FPGA and ASIC emulation as well as
`complex PCB level designs. Responsibilities as founder were to identify specific
`business opportunities as well as to manage and implement portions of the technical
`projects.
`
`Page 5 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 5 of 25
`
`
`
`August 1987
`From:
`March 1989
`To:
`Organization: Quickturn Systems, Inc.
`Title:
`Applications Manager
`Summary:
`Quickturn developed an ASIC emulator using Xilinx FPGAs. Mr. Gomez was hired as
`Quickturn's first applications engineer, and was initially responsible for developing the
`training and demonstration systems for Quickturn's initial customers. Later as the
`company matured, he managed the customer support team. Since this ASIC emulator
`worked at a fraction of clock speed, he developed a methodology of slowing board
`designs to 100s of KHz while maintaining clock and memory (DRAM) integrity.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`July 1987
`September 1988
`Telestream Corporation
`Applications Engineer
`Applications engineer responsible for demonstration system development, training and
`sales support of the Telestream programmable voice and data management system.
`
`From:
`To:
`Organization:
`Title:
`Summary:
`
`March 1985
`April 1987
`Stratacom, Inc.
`Design Engineer
`Responsible for development and maintenance of an Adaptive Differential Pulse Code
`Modulation (ADPCM) voice compression board. This system allowed twice as many
`calls to be placed on Tl transmission lines. Also developed Stratacom’s digital data
`over T1 lines which was used in Stratacom's network management system, a precursor
`to frame-relay.
`
`June 1983
`From:
`March 1985
`To:
`Organization: ROLM Corporation
`Title:
`Design Engineer
`Summary:
`Responsible for the development of a multiplex/demultiplex hardware board used in
`the ROLM BUS 295 telephone switch. A novel elastic buffer was used to
`automatically determine the length of an inter-cabinet data bus, whose length varied
`based on the customer's requirements. This eliminated the need for manufacturing
`technicians to manually adjust clock skew.
`
`Page 6 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 6 of 25
`
`
`
`Litigation Support Experience
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fabricant LLP
`Rampart v. NXP Semiconductors
`6:21-CV-01294-ADA
`
`Supported Rampart
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated DDR SDRAM memory systems
`
`Dates
`
`December 2022 - September 2023
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Winston Strawn LLP
`Flypsi Inc. v. Google LLC
`6:22-cv-00031
`
`Supported Flypsi
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated Voice over IP software code.
`
`Dates
`
`February 2023 - Present
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Sheridan Ross LLC
`K.Mizra v. Cisco Systems
`6:20-cv-01031
`
`Supported K.Mizra
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to contagion detection, isolation and
`repair.
`
`Dates
`
`February 2023 - Present
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`
`Page 7 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 7 of 25
`
`
`
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
`RICMIC LLC v. Teldata Enterprise Networks
`3:21-cv-1334-CAB-MDD
`
`Supported Teldata
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Wrote invalidity report to a health care and safety alerting system patent.
`Investigated prior art source code.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2022 - May 2023
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Hoge Fenton LLP
`Michael Joseph Costabile v. Ustopit, LLC
`7:21-cv-00155-BO
`
`Supported Michael Constablile
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of timing systems in sports events. Wrote
`claim construction report and defended opinions at deposition.
`
`Dates
`
`August 2022 - March 2023
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fabricant LLP
`RFCyber v. Apple Inc.
`IPR2022-00412, IPR2022-00413
`
`Supported RFCyber
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Wrote and defended a response to invalidity contentions concerning security
`used in financial transactions.
`
`Dates
`
`November 2022 - February 2023
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fabricant LLP
`Rampart Asset Management v. NXP, Renesas, Texas Instruments,
`Huawei and Silicon Motion.
`6:20-cv-01031
`
`Supported Rampart Asset Management
`
`Page 8 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 8 of 25
`
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to PCIe equalization circuits.
`
`Dates
`
`January 2022 - February 2022
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Fish and Richards
`Ikorongo v. Bumble Trading LLC
`6:20-cv-00256
`
`Supported Bumble Trading LLC
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to collecting geographic location data
`from cell phones.
`
`Dates
`
`October 2021 - November 2021
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Folio Law PLLC
`K.Mizra v. Cisco Systems
`6:20-cv-01031
`
`Supported K.Mizra
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to contagion detection, isolation and
`repair.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2021 - October 2021
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Mintz
`Philips v. MediaTek, RealTek
`337-TA-1222
`
`Supported Philips
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to securing digital video.
`
`Dates
`
`January 2021 - July 2021
`
`Expert Engagement:
`
`Page 9 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 9 of 25
`
`
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`EcoFactor v. Google, ecobee, Alarm, Vivent
`337-TA-1185
`
`Supported EcoFactor
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to smart thermostat devices.
`
`Dates
`
`February 2020 - September 2020
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`Pavo Technologies v. Kingston
`8:14-cv-1352-JLS
`
`Supported Pavo
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`Investigated infringement related to USB Flash Drives. I provided a
`written opinion, defended my opinions in a deposition and testified at
`trial.
`
`February 2019 - February 2020
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick
`Infinity Computer Products Inc. v. Toshiba America Business Solutions’
`2:12-cv-06796-NIQA
`
`Supported Konica Minolta Business Solutions (Defendant).
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement related to fax/business copy solutions
`
`Dates
`
`April 2019 - June 2019
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Contracts Dispute
`HorizonIP
`Smith v. ORBCOMM
`
`Supported ORBCOMM
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated geolocation services for asset tracking.
`
`Dates
`
`March 2019 - July 2019
`
`Page 10 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 10 of 25
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Russ August & Kabat
`SPEX Technologies v. Kingston
`
`Supported SPEX
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Dates
`
`Investigated infringement related to secure disk drives. I provided a
`written opinion, defended my opinions in three depositions and testified
`at trial.
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`January 2017 - July 2020
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics
`Inv.
`
`Supported Synopsys
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed FPGA based hardware emulators relative to patent infringement
`allegations. Provided written statements.
`
`Dates
`
`December 2014 – September 2017
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Inter Partes Review
`Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts
`NA
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Researched prior art related to video conferencing systems.
`
`Dates
`
`May 2016 – March 2017
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement and Trade Secret Cases
`Russ August & Kabat
`VIA Technologies, Inc., et al. v. ASUS Computer International, Inc.Case No.
`5:14-cv-03586-BLF
`
`Supported VIA Technologies.
`
`Page 11 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 11 of 25
`
`
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed hardware infringement of USB and PCIE drivers. Analyzed trade
`secrets theft of the same hardware. Provided written statements and oral
`testimony. I provided a written opinion, defended my opinions in three
`depositions and presented our positions at an arbitration hearing.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2015 – August 2017
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY P.C.
`Smartflash LLC, et al. v Google Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 6:14-cv-435- KNM
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed Google in-app purchase client-server software.
`
`Dates
`
`January 2015 – November 2015
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Certain Consumer Electronics and Display Devices with Graphics
`Processing and Graphics Processing Units Therein
`
`Nvidia v. Qualcomm, Samsung, Imagination
`Inv. No. 337-TA-932
`
`Supported Nvidia
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed thread execution and video processing in graphics integrated
`circuits.
`
`Dates
`
`December 2014 – May 2015
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`CALDWELL CASSADY CURRY P.C.
`Smartflash LLC, et al. v Apple Inc., et al.,
`Case No. 6:13-cv-447-MHS-KNM
`
`Supported Smartflash
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed Apple in-app purchase client-server software.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2014 – August 2014
`
`Page 12 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 12 of 25
`
`
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane P.C.
`Durie Tangri
`Narada Systems, LLC v. Tabula Inc.
`Case No. 6:13-cv-336-LED
`
`Supported Tabula Inc.
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed prior art related to FPGA switch and routing fabrics.
`
`Dates
`
`February 2014 – April 2014
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison Foerster
`Intellectual Ventures I & II, LLC et al. v. Altera Corporation et al.
`Case No. 10cv 01065-LPS
`
`Supported Altera and Xilinx
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Analyzed prior art related to systems on a chip.
`
`Dates
`
`September 2012 – May 2014
`
`Expert Engagement:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`ParkerVision Inc. Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated.
`
`Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-719-J-37-TEM
`
`Supported ParkerVision
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Reviewed schematics related to the down conversion of a radio
`frequency signal to a base band signal.
`
`Dates
`
`September 2012 – May 2013
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`WI-LAN INC., v. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., and
`EXEDEA, INC.
`
`Page 13 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 13 of 25
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-68
`Supported WiLAN
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated patent infringement related to the decoding and encoding of
`broadband transmission. I investigated VHDL, Verilog, C, and C++
`source code related to Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing and
`SC-OFDMA
`
`Dates
`
`September 2012 – August 2013
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe
`Lantiq Deutschland GmbH v. Ralink Technology Corp., et al.
`
`Civil Action No. 11-cv-00234-EJD
`Supported Ralink
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated patent infringement related to fractional phase lock loops and
`integer phase lock loops embedded in Ethernet and DSL circuits.
`
`May 2012 – September 2012
`
`Dates
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison and Foerster
`Sonic v. Arteris
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 11-CV-05311 MEJ
`
`Supporting Sonic
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigating infringement of hardware patents related to integrated
`circuit interconnections.
`
`Dates
`
`March 2012 – February 2013
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`
`Page 14 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 14 of 25
`
`
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Quinn Emanuel
`MotionPoint v. Transperfect
`
`Supported MotionPoint
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to language
`translation. Offered an opinion regarding MotionPoint’s product
`infringement on the asserted patent and invalidity thereof. Testified at
`trial in the United States District Court, Northern District of California
`Oakland Division.
`
`Dates:
`
`August 2012 – July 1 2013
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Faegre Baker Daniels
`Honeywell International, Inc, v. Nest Labs Inc., and Best Buy Co. Inc.
`Case No. 12-cv-299 (SRN/JSM)
`
`Supporting Honeywell International
`
`Services Provided: Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to power stealing.
`
`Dates:
`
`July 2012 – August 2012
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`DLAPiper
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP.
`v. TIVO Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`Civil Action No. 5:11-00053-DF
`
`Supported Motorola
`
`Services Provided: Investigated infringement of software patents related to Personal Video
`Recording devices.
`
`Page 15 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 15 of 25
`
`
`
`Dates:
`
`February 2012 – August 2012
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington
`D.C.
`TiVo Inc. v Verizon Communications Inc. et al.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
`Case No. 2:09-cv-257-DF (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to digital video
`recording.
`
`Dates:
`
`April 2012 – June 2012
`
`Expert
`Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McDermott Will & Emery
`MotionPoint v. Transperfect
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 4:10-cv-02590-CW (JCS)
`
`Supported MotionPoint
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to language
`translation.
`
`Dates:
`
`January 2012 – June 2012
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`DLA Piper LLP
`Freescale Semiconductor v. Funai Electric, MediaTek Inc., Zoran Corporation
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`Case No. ITC 337-TA-786
`Supporting Funai, MediaTek, Zoran.
`
`Page 16 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 16 of 25
`
`
`
`Supported Zoran
`
`Services Provided:
`
`None
`
`Dates:
`
`October 2011 – June 2012
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Morrison and Foerster
`Altera v. LSI
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`Case No. 11-cv-03139 CW
`Supported Altera
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to integrated circuit power
`management, clock recovery and high-speed bus implementations.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2011 – September 2011
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Jones Day
`Nielsen. v comScore Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
`Case No. 1:11-cv-290-LMB-TRJ
`Supported Nielsen
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to the collection of
`demographic information from survey panels and automated user identification.
`I investigated C, C++, C#, Java and SQL code residing on servers and personal
`computers.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2011 – September 2011
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`Active Video Networks Inc. v Verizon Communications Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
`Case No. 2:10-cv-248-RAJ-FBS
`
`Page 17 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 17 of 25
`
`
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to communications
`between the set-top box and content providing servers at the communications
`head-end.
`
`Dates
`
`December 2010 – March 2011
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`HTC v. Apple Computers in the matter of Certain Portable Electronic Devices
`and Related Software.
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON D.C.
`Case 337-TA-721
`
`Supported HTC
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to power management in
`smart phones.
`
`Dates
`
`November 2010 – January 2011.
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. P.L.L.C. Washington D.C.
`Verizon Communications Inc. in the matter of Certain Digital Set-Top Boxes
`UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`WASHINGTON D.C.
`Case 337-TA-712
`Case 337-TA-717
`
`Supported Verizon
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to communications
`between the set-top box and content providing servers at the communications
`head-end.
`
`Dates
`
`June 2010 – September 2010
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`McKool Smith, Dallas Texas
`WiLAN Inc. v. Acer, et. al.
`
`Page 18 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 18 of 25
`
`
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`Civil Action No. 2-07CV-473 (E.D. Tex.)
`WiLAN Inc. v. Acer, et. al.
`
`Civil Action No. 2-07CV-473 (E.D. Tex.)
`WiLAN Inc. v. Westell Technologies Inc.
`
`Civil Action No. 2:08-CV-247 (TJW)
`WiLAN Inc. v. RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION,
`RESEARCH IN MOTION LTD.,
`MOTOROLA, INC., UTSTARCOM, INC.,
`LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM
`U.S.A., AND LG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`
`Case No. 5:08-CV-04555-JW
`WiLan v. Intel
`
`Supported WiLAN
`
`Services Provided:
`
`These cases consisted of 802.11a,b,g,n and Bluetooth investigations. In
`as much I investigated infringement of hardware patents related to the
`decoding and encoding of broadband transmission. Investigated Verilog,
`C, and C++ source code related to Bluetooth piconets, Orthogonal
`Frequency Division Multiplexing and Complementary Code Key
`incorporated in various integrated circuits. In addition to the above
`investigations, I was deposed and was asked to testify. This case settled
`before trial.
`
`Dates
`
`May 2009 – March 2011
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Jones Day, Palo Alto CA.
`Agere Systems Inc. and LSI Corp. vs. Xilinx, Inc.
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN D1STR[CT OF NEW YORK
`Case 09 Civ. 9717 (JSR)
`Case 09 Civ. 9719 (JSR)
`
`Supported Xilinx
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware patents related to the
`implementation of Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs).
`
`Dates
`
`February 2010 – April 2010
`
`Expert Engagement:
`
`Page 19 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 19 of 25
`
`
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Goodwin Procter LLP
`MedioStream, Inc. v. Acer, et al.
`Consolidated Case No. 2:08-CV-369-CE, Eastern District of Texas
`
`Supported MedioStream
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of software patents related to the decoding and
`encoding of video in Apple Computer products. Investigated C, C++ and
`Objective C source code in various video transcoding applications.
`
`Dates
`
`July 2009 – October 2010
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice.
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs. AOL LLC, et. al.
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division
`C.A. No. 1:08-cv-01009-GBL-IDD
`
`Supported Rembrandt Data Technologies.
`
`Services Provided:
`
`Investigated infringement of hardware and software patents related to the
`transmission of data, voice and video over cable networks.
`
`Miguel Gomez performed the following tasks:
`§
`Investigated assembly level source code for a V.34 modem physical layer
`modulation and de-modulation circuit.
`§ Gave testimony at deposition.
`
`Dates
`
`April 2009 – June 2009
`
`Expert Engagement:
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Names:
`
`Patent Infringement Case
`Kellogg, Huber, Todd, Evans & Figel Washington D.C.
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs. Comcast, et. al.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`2:06-cv-00047-TJW-CE
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
`SHARP CORPORATION and
`SHARP ELECTRONICS CORP.
`
`Page 20 of 25 Pages
`
`Orckit Exhibit 2026
`Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Orckit Corp.
`IPR2023-00554, Page 20 of 25
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:06CV507 (LED)
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., )
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS )
`OPERATING, LLC, and COXCOM, INC.
`
`2:06-cv-00223-TJW-CE
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
`CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC,
`CHARIER COMMUNICATIONS
`OPERATING, LLC, COX
`COMMUNICATIONS, INC, COXCOM,
`INC, COX ENTERPRISES, INC., CSC
`HOLDINGS, INC, and CABLEVISION
`SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
`
`THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
`
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`Case No. 02-41729 (REG)
`Rembrandt Data Technologies vs.
`Adelphia Communications Corporation; )
`Century-TCI California, LP; )
`Century-TCI California Communications, LP; )
`Century-TCI Distribution Company, LLC; )
`Century-TCI Holdings, LLC; )
`Parnassos, LP; )
`Parnassos Communications, LP; )
`Parnassos Distribution Company I, LLC; )
`Parnassos Distribution Company II, LLC; )
`Parna