throbber
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 6:22-cv-00077-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`SPEIR TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`PLAINTIFF’S PRELIMINARY DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS TO DEFENDANT APPLE INC.
`
`Speir Technologies Ltd. (“Plaintiff” or “Speir”) submits the following Preliminary
`
`Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions to Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`(“Defendant” or “Apple”). This disclosure is based on the information available to Speir as of the
`
`date of this disclosure, and Speir reserves the right to amend this disclosure to the full extent
`
`consistent with the Court’s Rules and Orders.
`
`I.
`
`Asserted Claims
`
`Speir asserts that Apple has infringed and continue to infringe at least the following claims
`
`of Speir’s patents (collectively, the “Asserted Claims”):
`
`A. U.S. Patent No. 8,345,780 (“the ’780 Patent”): Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
`
`13, and 14.
`
`B. U.S. Patent No. 7,110,779 (“the ’779 Patent”): Claims 18, 19, 20, 21, and 23.
`
`C. U.S. Patent No. 7,321,777 (“the ’777 Patent”): Claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 13, 14, 16, 20,
`
`and 21.
`
`D. U.S. Patent No. 7,765,399 (“the ’399 Patent”): Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9.
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1033
`
`

`

`Speir reserves the right to seek leave of court to add, delete, substitute, or otherwise amend
`
`this list of asserted claims should further discovery, the Court’s claim construction, or other
`
`circumstances so merit.
`
`II.
`
`Accused Products
`
`Speir contends that the Asserted Claims are infringed by the various apparatuses used,
`
`made, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the United States by Apple (the “Accused Products”).
`
`The Accused Products include at least the following, as well as products with reasonably similar
`
`functionality:
`
`•
`
`’780 Patent: iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone
`
`SE (3rd Generation), iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max,
`
`iPad Pro (5th Generation), iPad Air (5th Generation), iPad Mini (6th Generation), and
`
`any other products with 5G functionality.
`
`•
`
`’777 and ’779 Patents: iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro, iPhone 11 Pro Max, iPhone 12,
`
`iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone
`
`13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, AirTags, and any other products with ultra-wideband
`
`(“UWB”) functionality.
`
`•
`
`’399 Patent: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone
`
`SE, iPhone 7, iPhone 7 Plus, iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X, iPhone XR, iPhone
`
`XS, iPhone XS Max, iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro, iPhone 11 Pro Max, iPhone SE (2nd
`
`Generation), iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone 12 Pro Max, iPhone
`
`13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, iPhone SE (3rd Generation),
`
`iPad (5th – 9th Generation with TouchID and/or FaceID), iPad Air (2nd – 5th
`
`Generation with TouchID and/or FaceID), iPad Pro (1st – 5th Generation with TouchID
`
`2
`
`

`

`and/or FaceID), iPad Mini (3rd – 6th Generation with TouchID and/or FaceID),
`
`MacBook Air (all models from 2018 – 2020 with TouchID), and MacBook Pro (all
`
`models from 2016 – present with TouchID).
`
`Speir reserves the right to amend this list of Accused Products, as well as other information
`
`contained in this document and the exhibits hereto, to incorporate new information learned during
`
`the course of discovery, including, but not limited to, the inclusion of newly released products,
`
`versions, or any other equivalent devices ascertained through discovery. Further, to the extent any
`
`accused infringing products have gone through or will go through name changes, but were or will
`
`be used or sold with the same accused features, earlier corresponding products under different
`
`names also are accused.
`
`III. Claim Charts
`
`Claim charts identifying a location of every element of every asserted claim of the asserted
`
`Speir Patents within accused products are attached hereto as Exhibits A-D. Speir’s analysis of the
`
`Accused Products is based on limited publicly available information and based on Speir’s own
`
`investigation prior to any discovery in this action. In an effort to focus the issues, Speir identifies
`
`exemplary evidence for each claim limitation. The evidence cited for a particular limitation should
`
`be considered in light of the additional evidence cited for the other claim limitations. Speir
`
`reserves the right to rely on evidence cited for any particular limitation of an asserted claim for
`
`any other limitation asserted for that claim. Unless otherwise indicated, the information provided
`
`that corresponds to each claim element is considered to indicate that each claim element is found
`
`within each of the different variations of each respective Accused Products described above.
`
`These infringement contentions are prepared with public information and have not been
`
`prepared with the benefit of discovery. The references provided in the attached charts may cite
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`particular versions of a given IEEE or 3GPP or other technical specification. It should be
`
`understood that references and citations are exemplary in nature and do not limit infringement
`
`assertions to only those releases or versions. Speir’s citation of portions of the IEEE and 3GPP
`
`standards herein should not be interpreted to limit Speir’s infringement proof in expert reports or
`
`at trial in any way. Speir’s citation of portions of the IEEE and 3GPP standards herein provides
`
`detailed notice of Speir’s theory of infringement, but Speir intends to rely on additional evidence
`
`including, but not limited to, data sheets, design specifications, source code, testing information,
`
`reference designs, implementation and utilization information, and/or schematics as proof of
`
`infringement in expert reports and at trial.
`
`Speir reserves the right to amend these claim charts, as well as other information
`
`contained in this document and the exhibits hereto. Speir further reserves the right to amend these
`
`claim charts to incorporate new information learned during the course of discovery, including, but
`
`not limited to, information that is not publicly available or readily discernible without discovery
`
`or undue burden.
`
`IV.
`
`Literal Infringement / Doctrine of Equivalents
`
`Speir asserts that Apple infringes the Asserted Claims listed above under at least 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 271(a), (b), (c), and/or (f). Speir contends that Apple has directly infringed and continues to
`
`directly infringe the asserted claims by making, using, offering for sale, selling, and importing
`
`into the United States the Accused Products. Speir also contends that Apple (i) induces end users
`
`of the Accused Products to directly infringe the Asserted Claims and (ii) contributes to end users’
`
`direct infringement of the Asserted Claims. Speir asserts that, under the proper construction of the
`
`Asserted Claims and their claim terms, the limitations of the asserted claims of the asserted Speir
`
`patents are literally present in the Accused Products, as set forth in the claim charts attached hereto
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`as Exhibits A-D. Speir contends that any and all elements found not to be literally infringed are
`
`infringed under the doctrine of equivalents because the differences between the claimed inventions
`
`and the Accused Products, if any, are insubstantial.
`
`Speir’s contention is that each limitation is literally met, and necessarily also would be met
`
`under the doctrine of equivalents because there are no substantial differences between the Accused
`
`Products and the claims, in function, way, or result. If Apple attempts to argue that there is no
`
`infringement literally and also no infringement under doctrine of equivalents and attempts to draw
`
`any distinction between the claimed functionality and the functionality in the Accused Products,
`
`then Speir reserves its right to rebut the alleged distinction as a matter of literal infringement and/or
`
`as to whether any such distinction is substantial under the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`Speir reserves the right to amend its Infringement Contentions as to literal infringement or
`
`infringement under the doctrine of equivalents in light of new information learned during the
`
`course of discovery and the Court’s claim construction.
`
`V.
`
`Priority Dates
`
`The Asserted Claims are entitled to a priority date of at least the following:
`
`A.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,345,780: Each asserted claim of the ’780 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of June 4, 2008.
`
`B.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,779: Each asserted claim of the ’779 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of January 29, 2004.
`
`C.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,321,777: Each asserted claim of the ’777 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of January 29, 2004.
`
`D.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,765,399: Each asserted claim of the ’399 Patent is entitled to at
`
`least a priority date of February 22, 2006.
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`VI.
`
`Identification of Instrumentalities Practicing the Claimed Inventions
`
`At this time, Speir is not relying on any assertion that any of its own instrumentalities
`
`practice the claims of the Asserted Patents.
`
`VII. Document Production Accompanying Disclosure
`
`Speir submits the following Document Production Accompanying Disclosure, along with
`
`an identification of the categories to which each of the documents corresponds.
`
`Speir is presently unaware of any documents sufficient to evidence any discussion with,
`
`disclosure to, or other manner of providing to a third party, or sale of or offer to sell, the inventions
`
`recited in the Asserted Claims of the asserted patents prior to the application date or priority date
`
`for the asserted patents. A diligent search continues for documents and Speir reserves the right to
`
`supplement this response.
`
`Speir is presently unaware of documents regarding the conception, reduction to practice,
`
`design, and development of each claimed invention of the asserted patents, which were created
`
`before the date of application for the asserted patent or the priority date identified above. A diligent
`
`search continues for documents and Speir reserves the right to supplement this response.
`
`Speir identifies the following documents as being the file histories for the Asserted Patents:
`
`SPEIR-APPLE-00000077 - SPEIR-APPLE-00000866.
`
`
`
`Dated: April 19, 2022
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Brett E. Cooper
`
`
`Brett E. Cooper (NY SBN 4011011)
`bcooper@raklaw.com
`Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN 246953)
`rmirzaie@raklaw.com
`Marc A. Fenster (CA SBN 181067)
`mfenster@raklaw.com
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Seth Hasenour (TX SBN 24059910)
`shasenour@raklaw.com
`Drew B. Hollander (NY SBN 5378096)
`dhollander@raklaw.com
`
`RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
`12424 Wilshire Blvd. 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Phone: (310) 826-7474
`Facsimile: (310) 826-6991
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Speir Technology
`Limited
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I certify that this document is being served upon counsel of record for Defendant via
`
`
`
`electronic service.
`
`
`
`/s/Drew B. Hollander
` Drew B. Hollander
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`8
`
`

`

`1
`
`
`
`least Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of the ’780 Patent.
`iPad Air (5th Generation), iPad Mini (6th Generation), and any other products with 5G functionality (“Accused Products”), infringe at
`12 Pro Max, iPhone SE (3rd Generation), iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Mini, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, iPad Pro (5th Generation),
`Apple products with 5G functionality, including without limitation the Apple iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Mini, iPhone 12 Pro, iPhone
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,345,780 (“the ’780 Patent”)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`technology.
`In particular, the Accused Products are configured to communicate with base stations using 5G cellular
`
`communication system.
`To the extent the preamble is limiting, each Accused Product is designed to be used as part of a wireless
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`system comprising:
`communication
`[1pre] A wireless
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`3
`
`See https://www.apple.com/iphone-12/specs/
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`€Laud!
`
`
`
`
`
`'9Z‘SZ‘LZ‘OZ‘GL‘SLZL‘VL‘EL‘ZL‘L
`
`
`
`(Sv‘9b‘Zr‘Lv‘Ov‘6E‘BE‘veSpueg)311-GL
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘008)VA8YyOG-AaWWGO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(L9zU‘O9TU'gSzUSpueg)aAeWWYNOS
`
`‘seu‘ogu‘6zu‘gzu‘GzuU‘OZU‘ZLU‘gu‘ZU‘Gu‘EU‘ZU‘LUSpueg)YNOS
`
`
`
`+L8vZVIePOWpuesejnyjaD
`
`(6ZU'8Z
`
`SSOAlIM
`
`
`
`puozuen=—AIIQ0Idi
`
`SIalUeD
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`.(@ABMWWpueZHX9-qns)9g
`
`sj@powjv
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘O08‘006‘0S8)3903/WS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOOLZ‘OO6L‘OOLZ/OOZL‘006‘0S8)VaGSH-90/+VdSH/SLWIN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘O08‘006‘0S8)3903/WS9
`
`‘OZ‘61
`
`‘BLZL‘VLEL‘ZL‘LL’
`
`
`
`
`
`(8v‘Ov‘Zr‘Lt‘Ov‘6E‘BE‘veSpueg)311-1
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘008)V‘AeOG-AaZVWGO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(L9ZU‘O9TU'BGzUSpueg)SAEYNOG
`
`
`
`su'LZu'ggu‘'gyu‘Lu‘oyu
`
`QUZu‘Su’cu‘Tu‘Luspueg)YN9S
`
`
`
`+Z807VISPOW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOOLZ‘OO6L‘OOLZ/O0ZL‘006‘0S8)WaGSH-9G/+VdSH/SLWN
`
`12
`
`

`

`5
`
`a transceiver designed for receiving and transmitting OFDM.
`5G uses OFDM in both the uplink and the downlink. Thus, the Accused Products and the base station must have
`
`The Accused Products and 5G base stations comprise OFDM transceivers.
`
`
`
`
`
`having at least one settable link characteristic.
`The Accused Products are configured to communicate with the base station via a wireless communications link
`
`See https://www.apple.com/iphone-13/specs/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`upon channel measurements and interference types and levels. See Claim [9c.4].
`5G NR compatible devices are able to set at least the following link characteristics: CQI, PMI, and RI based
`
`5G NR compatible devices are also able to set the best beam on which to receive. See Claim 10.
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`second controllers
`respective first and
`transceivers and
`(OFDM) wireless
`multiplexing
`division
`frequency-
`orthogonal
`and second
`respective first
`comprising
`devices
`communications
`wireless
`and second
`[1b.1] said first
`
`characteristic;
`one settable link
`link having at least
`communications
`via a wireless
`with one another
`to communicate
`devices configured
`communications
`second wireless
`[1a] first and
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`6
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.300 V15.13.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16)
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`interference;
`characteristics of
`term historical
`short term and long
`configured to store
`coupled thereto and
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`7
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.211 V15.9.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`For example, the iPhone 12 has a Qualcomm SDR865 5G / LTE transceiver.
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`8
`
`
`
`See https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+12+and+12+Pro+Teardown/137669
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`9
`
`over varying lengths of time.
`These SRS may be used by the base stations to perform Signal to Interference and Noise (SINR) measurements
`base stations can configure the Accused Products to transmit Sounding Reference Signals (SRS) in the UL.
`The base stations are configured to store short term and long term historical characteristics of interference. The
`
`
`
`
`
`See Claim [9b].
`The Accused Products are configured to store short term and long term historical characteristics of interference.
`
`
`
`See https://www.techinsights.com/blog/teardown/apple-iphone-13-pro-teardown
`
`
`
`
`
`and second
`respective first
`transceivers and
`(OFDM) wireless
`multiplexing
`frequency-division
`second orthogonal
`respective first and
`devices comprising
`communications
`second wireless
`[1b.2] said first and
`
`For example, the iPhone 13 has a Qualcomm SDR868 5G transceiver.
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`10
`
`
`
`See Chris Johnson, 5G New Radio in Bullets, Section 7.5.3 (2019).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`interference;
`characteristics of
`historical
`and long term
`store short term
`and configured to
`coupled thereto
`controllers
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`
`
`11
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`12
`
`
`
`The base station can configure the SRS to be periodic, semi-persistent or aperiodic.
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.211 V15.9.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`
`
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.3 (2d Ed. 2018).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`

`

`13
`
`
`
`See Chris Johnson, 5G New Radio in Bullets, Section 7.5.3 (2019).
`
`
`
`
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.3.3 (2d Ed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`21
`
`

`

`14
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`See Claim [9c.1].
`
`
`
`detect received
`configured to
`controller
`[1c] said first
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`22
`
`

`

`15
`
`See Claim [9c.3]
`
`See Claim [9c.2]
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`wideband
`types comprising
`of interference
`among a plurality
`interference from
`received
`type of the
`[1d.2] determine a
`interference, and
`characteristics of
`term historical
`short term and long
`signal with the
`current received
`characteristic of a
`least one
`upon comparing at
`interference based
`narrowband
`interference, and
`interference, self
`wideband
`types comprising
`of interference
`among a plurality
`interference from
`received
`type of the
`[1d.1] determine a
`
`
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`interference,
`
`
`
`
`
`23
`
`

`

`16
`
`
`
`transmit CSI reports to the base station containing CQI, PMI, and RI information. See Claim [9b].
`The Accused Products may be configured to repeatedly perform CSI-IM measurements and to repeatedly
`
`
`
`detecting, determining, and setting.
`The first controller of the wireless communication system according to claim 1 is configured to repeat the
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`See Claim [9c.4]
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`controller is configured
`wherein said first
`according to claim 1
`communication system
`[2] The wireless
`
`interference type.
`upon the
`interference based
`received
`compensate for the
`characteristic to
`one settable link
`[1e] set the at least
`interference, and
`characteristics of
`historical
`long term
`short term and
`signal with the
`current received
`characteristic of a
`at least one
`upon comparing
`interference based
`narrowband
`interference, and
`interference, self
`
`Claim 1
`
`
`
`Claim 2
`
`Claim 2
`
`
`
`
`
`24
`
`

`

`17
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`See Claim 11.
`
`
`
`
`wherein said first
`characteristic; and
`processing
`at least one transmit
`characteristic comprises
`settable link
`wherein the at least one
`according to claim 1
`communication system
`[4] The wireless
`
`See Claim 10.
`
`
`
`
`characteristic.
`processing
`at least one receive
`characteristic comprises
`settable link
`wherein the at least one
`according to claim 1
`communication system
`[3] The wireless
`
`
`
`Claim 4
`
`Claim 4
`
`
`
`Claim 3
`
`Claim 3
`
`
`
`
`determining, and setting.
`to repeat the detecting,
`
`
`
`Claim 2
`
`
`
`
`
`25
`
`

`

`18
`
`
`
`(FEC), channel bandwidth, and adaptive filtering.
`least one of transmission power, frequency diversity, time diversity, modulation, forward error correction
`The settable link characteristic of the wireless communication system according to claim 1 comprises at
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`For example, the settable link characteristic includes the CQI which indicates both the modulation and
`
`
`
`characteristics measurements.
`characteristics. For example, it is configured to determine the interference type based upon noise
`the interference type based upon at least one of fade characteristics, noise characteristics, and path
`The first controller of the wireless communication system according to claim 1 is configured to determine
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`See Claim [9b] and Claim [9c.1].
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`characteristic.
`processing
`the at least one transmit
`second controller to set
`to cooperate with said
`controller is configured
`
`
`
`Claim 4
`
`characteristics.
`characteristics, and path
`characteristics, noise
`upon at least one of fade
`interference type based
`to determine the
`controller is configured
`wherein said first
`according to claim 1
`communication system
`[7] The wireless
`
`
`
`settable link
`wherein the at least one
`according to claim 1
`communication system
`[8] The wireless
`Claim 8
`
`Claim 8
`
`
`
`Claim 7
`
`Claim 7
`
`
`
`
`
`26
`
`

`

`19
`
`
`
`having at least one settable link characteristic.
`operable to communicate with an an other wireless communications device via a wireless communications link
`To the extent the preamble is limiting, each Accused Product includes a wireless communications device
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`technology.
`In particular, the Accused Products are configured to communicate with base stations using 5G cellular
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`forward error correction.
`
`See Claim 11.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`adaptive filtering.
`channel bandwidth, and
`error correction (FEC),
`modulation, forward
`time diversity,
`frequency diversity,
`transmission power,
`at least one of
`characteristic comprises
`
`Claim 8
`
`
`
`device comprising:
`communications
`wireless
`characteristic, the
`one settable link
`link having at least
`communications
`wireless
`device via a
`communications
`an other wireless
`communicate with
`device operable to
`communications
`[9pre] A wireless
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`27
`
`

`

`20
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`28
`
`

`

`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`21
`
`See https://www.apple.com/iphone-12/specs/
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`29
`
`

`

`€Leuoud!
`
`
`
`
`3u‘Ogu‘6Zu'gzU‘Gzu‘OZU‘ZLU‘gu‘ZU‘Gu‘gu‘ZU‘LUSpueg)YN9S+Z780ZV[2POW
`
`/UOZLOAIIQOW@quudsLei—~SIaLUeD
`
`pu‘Zu‘gu‘Zu‘gu‘gu‘Zu‘Luspueg)YNOS+L80ZVIPPONpuesejnjaD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`,‘Ov‘Zr‘Lv‘Ov‘6E'8E‘veSpueg)311-GL
`
`ZE‘OE'6Z‘8Z
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L'008)V¥‘A8YOG-AZJVWGO
`
`
`
`
`
`‘LL‘8‘Z'S‘v'e'Z'Lspueg)311-GG4
`
`
`
`u'Lzu'ggu‘gu‘Lu‘pu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`O9ZU‘8SZUSpueg)sAeAAWWYNOG
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘OO8L‘006‘0S8)3DG3a/WSO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOOLZ‘OO6L‘O0LZ/00ZL‘006‘0S8)VaGSH-90/+VdSH/SLWN
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L008)V‘A®YyOG-AZVWGO
`
`
`
`‘Ov‘Zr‘Lv‘Ov'6>‘vespueg)311-GL
`
`
`
`ZUSpueg)sAeAAWWYNOS
`
`
`
` 99ZEOF62¢|spueg)311-004
`
`
`
`U'LZU'9QU‘gy‘LpU‘OvUSsojallM
`
`OTIQOW
`
`PURMON
`
`
`
`22
`
`
`
`
`
`cc
`
`.(@ABMWWpueZHX9-qns)9gsjepowjv
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOO6L‘O08‘006‘0S8)39G3/WS9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(ZHWOOLZ‘OO6L‘O0LZ/00ZL‘006‘0S8)VaGSH-9d/+VdSH/SLWN
`
`30
`
`

`

`23
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.300 V15.13.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`transceiver.
`In each Accused Product, the device includes an orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) wireless
`
`designed for receiving and transmitting OFDM.
`5G uses OFDM in both the uplink and the downlink. Thus, the Accused Products must have a transceiver
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`upon channel measurements and interference types and levels. See Claim [9c.4].
`5G NR compatible devices are able to set at least the following network characteristics: CQI, PMI, and RI based
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`
`
`See https://www.apple.com/iphone-13/specs/
`
`
`
`transceiver; and
`(OFDM) wireless
`multiplexing
`frequency-division
`[9a] an orthogonal
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`31
`
`

`

`24
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.211 V15.9.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`For example, the iPhone 12 has a Qualcomm SDR865 5G / LTE transceiver.
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`32
`
`

`

`25
`
`
`
`See https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+12+and+12+Pro+Teardown/137669
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`33
`
`

`

`26
`
`
`
`that is coupled to the transceiver.
`For example, the iPhone 12 contains a Qualcomm SDX55M 5G modem that contains one or more controllers
`
`
`
`term and long term historical characteristics of interference.
`Each Accused Product includes a controller coupled to said wireless transceiver and configured to store short
`
`See https://www.techinsights.com/blog/teardown/apple-iphone-13-pro-teardown
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`For example, the iPhone 13 has a Qualcomm SDR868 5G transceiver.
`
`interference;
`characteristics of
`term historical
`short term and long
`configured to store
`transceiver and
`wireless
`coupled to said
`[9b] a controller
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`34
`
`

`

`27
`
`For example, the iPhone 13 has a Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 5G modem that contains one or more controllers
`
`
`
`
`
`See https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+12+and+12+Pro+Teardown/137669
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`35
`
`

`

`28
`
`wideband / narrowband CQI, PMI, RI, and cri.
`(CSI-IM) resource sets. These are used to perform CSI measurements which result in the reporting of at least
`channel-state-information reference signals (CSI-RS) and channel-state-information interference measurement
`characteristics of interference. For example, 5G-NR compatible UE are configured in the downlink with
`The controllers in the Accused Products are configured to store short term and long term historical
`
`
`
`
`
`See https://www.techinsights.com/blog/teardown/apple-iphone-13-pro-teardown
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`that is coupled to the transceiver.
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`36
`
`

`

`29
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`37
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`30
`
`Id.
`
`Id.
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`38
`
`

`

`31
`
`
`
`The CSI-RS can also be used for interference measurement as well as for channel measurement.
`
`
`
`See Chris Johnson, 5G New Radio in Bullets, Section 3.7.4. (2019).
`
`
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Ch. 8 Abstract (2d Ed.
`
`
`
`
`
`The CSI-RS can be used for Channel State Information reporting.
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`39
`
`

`

`32
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.1.4 (2d Ed.
`
`CSI-RS and CSI-IM can be configured to have a periodicity (i.e. repetition rate).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The CSI-IM resources can be used for measuring self-interference.
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40
`
`

`

`33
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.1.3 (2d Ed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.1.4 (2d Ed.
`
`The reporting of the CSI information may also be configured to be periodic.
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`41
`
`

`

`34
`
`of the channel and interference measurements it should make.
`The Accused Products are configured to receive the CSI-ReportConfig parameter structure that informs the UE
`
`
`
`
`
`Each Accused Product includes a controller configured to detect received interference.
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`interference,
`detect received
`configured to
`controller
`[9c.1] said
`
`
`
`
`
`42
`
`

`

`35
`
`
`
`See Chris Johnson, 5G New Radio in Bullets, Section 3.7.4. (2019).
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`43
`
`

`

`36
`
`
`
`
`
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.2 (2d Ed. 2018).
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`44
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`37
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`45
`
`

`

`38
`
`
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.214 V15.14.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`46
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`39
`
`
`
`
`
`Id.
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`47
`
`

`

`40
`
`2018).
`See Erik Dahlman et al., 5G NR: The Next Generation Wireless Access Technology, Section 8.1.2 (2d Ed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`historical characteristics of interference.
`upon comparing at least one characteristic of a current received signal with the short term and long term
`interference types according to wideband interference, self interference, and narrowband interference based
`Each of the Accused Products determines a type of the received interference from among a plurality of
`
`part of the bandwidth that the UE is configured to receive.
`For example, the CSI-RS and CSI-IM resource sets may be specified across the entire bandwidth-part or just a
`
`
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.211 V15.9.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`
`
`interference, and
`characteristics of
`term historical
`short term and long
`signal with the
`current received
`characteristic of a
`least one
`upon comparing at
`interference based
`narrowband
`interference, and
`interference, self
`wideband
`types according to
`of interference
`among a plurality
`interference from
`received
`a type of the
`[9c.2] determine
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`48
`
`

`

`41
`
`
`
`See Chris Johnson, 5G New Radio in Bullets, Section 3.7.4. (2019).
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`49
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`42
`
`Id.
`
`
`
`See 3GPP TS 38.331 V 15.15.0 (and all versions of Release 15 and Release 16).
`
`
`
`
`
`Exemplary Evidence of Infringement
`
`
`
`Claim 9
`
`
`
`
`
`50
`
`

`

`SU1SOdZNLeecs
`
`
`
`
`but3(s)ed.QOHpure(s)sysosnosJOHFunesipuraywjyg-yDJ&0}aduesayesesuTEJUODSY-[SDIpoIayofiuy-j9b
`
`
`
`
`
`sadeyJaysryayyAqpayeotpurse(s)uoremBryUoJasaaInosaslSY-[SDTZN30WJoau0IMApamnFyuooaqwedFNeqL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dINOSETSY-[SDUy}YMpayuyssumesSutpodasayyyeuMpayersosseGuuonOjcodsusajawresedsakeyaysry
`
`SUISSEUEDFA)SYAYOYJOJpueJasVoINOsEISY-[SDBYApayeroossestJagaaumosay-SY-ISD-dZNUtofiey-saz
`
`
`
`
`
`APIVSWISOwarstssad-turas/a1porsadsoyyasjzoJo]spueAroiporadsy-ISOampseuyapsePOpupdisiporaed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JASB24NOSEY-SU-ISD-dZNpuesifuojasmosay-JS-D‘224n0say-SU-ISD-dZNJajowuesedJaAe]Jaystyayyerapesmnsyu0s
`
`
`
`
`UdSUISpue‘quasedpodgy-1s9yoreJoGrsuepAouanbeysy-[soseuyapSurddnpyaounosasurGisuap
`
`
`
`
`SSNETDUlUSATSSaNfeAsTQeMoTyeayyasayM‘usayedpuesanyeaJDseuyepSurddypyasmosasuradXy-mpoase
`
`
`
`
`
`ISOseauepFNweyFYdaSU-ISOdZN%JUdaHOSAdJoonespaumsseayystyoryaWQyoquojianod
`
`
`
`dZN[ZYJoSstsu0dJasBdINOSAISY-ISOdZNWeYWagsounosey-Su-[SD-dZNpue‘syuopsomosay-[¢pssajauresed
`
`
`
`
`ayyzoAosuednososarseognspueoquiAsPyIqjopue‘ad.Q-jyqg‘syodjosequinuayysauyepSurddypyaounosae
`
`
`HOdd'S§ueaqAegyeM‘uonersosseedA[-JOO,WMASyueo}souasayaseBILMpamMByuodstaw7g-7T
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ot}UTpayeoo]otporedsepamsyuoos0InoselSY-ISD8JO(MGId/DDWeseyipJoswessy}Ulpajyes0]YOoTq
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOaes3qWEDJasTTOJOTSaryapy“.Qrorporsadauresay]YIMpamnsyUo0dasejassuoUIWyLMs8dINOSaISY-ISD
`
`
`
`ayvayaATuopammZyUo0.oqWEDpUe“Z°[9"¢ASMEUTpaqisosapseJOUJOJa}UOTsstwsUeRUTeWOpjeNeds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`peyursSunesSunsodasamp[yeLMpayerosseGyuwnOjzoda.sajawesedJaAR]JaystyayVay.JopamnZyuoo
`
`
`UPDZp)JepAY.ASouppureJassdINOSAISY-[SDBUPApayeroossestjags2uosey-SY-[SD-dZNwiuouyadss
`
`
`
`-SY-ISD-TZNBpUtsaosmnosesSY-ISDdZNPenstyuooayyJoxepurpodawresaryyypodeuuayueampyey}
`
`
`
`
`
`UlUaATdasesanyeasTQemoyyeayyasaym‘spodgy-[sojoJequinuayyseuyepSurddypyaouosadUtSJ4OGfou
`
`joustSuryesSurpodaswaypasnsyUodaquedpUe[-["OTCSSNETDUTpaqrsosapseatesatyStJag¢aounosey
`
`
`
`YUUAMOPSUESSY]YIMPayrUsuesaseJagsDINOsaySY-ISOdZN2}VMsaosnosalSY-[SOeuyeuinsse
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aseaoINOsalSY-[SDJoyJomodworsstwsueNoO9Z-VOUsUINSsE[[EYSZAFy}YorJoyssajewesedSurmoyjoyayy
`
`
`
`WOUTTODayy0}padsasILMstQuswapUTpayeotpuruoTEIOTTeGywas/ppoayy*z/]Aysuapsoq[TITSe
`
`
`
`SL‘¢]JOCVPLa8NepOUTUaATsasesanyeaa]qemoryeayyazayM‘Z/]JOanyeaQisuapat]Joaseouryasyyjo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UOTeINSYWOSSY-[SDyoresozsomNoses
`
`
`
`‘(s)eomnosalSY-ISO
`
`
`
`43
`
`
`
`
`
`ey
`
`
`
`
`
`“QUOL,0}JasStJasBoINOseZSY-[SDem}TMA
`
`“QUOT,JOJYSY-Wd,0}Jasstjes
`
`
`
`“EMG10/99qasayip30aures
`
`
`
`
`
`“UFPAJEIO]SFSY-ISOpamsguosaigpedmprapuegyorseuyapSyuops2umosey-[SDWiPl-TME
`
`
`
`
`
`“FATF019HOG/SS03TUTSWISDdZNJoonespauunssearpstyorym-scrasPOsoquojismod
`
`
`
`
`
`-aztsdaysgp|warmgp[cy‘g-]soeBuexsa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket