throbber
[CANCER RESEARCH 36, 1453-1461 , April 1976)
`
`The Disposition and Pharmacokinetics in Humans of 5-Azacytidine
`Administered Intravenously as a Bolus or by Continuous Infusion1
`
`Zafar H. lsraili,2 William R. Vogler, Elizabeth S. Mingioli, James L. Pirkle, Robert W. Smithwick, and Jacob H.
`Goldstein
`
`Departments of Medicine (Clinical Pharmacology, Hematology, and Medical Oncology; Z. H. I., W. A. V., E. S. M.Jand Chemistry(J
`Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
`
`L P A. W. 5., J. H. GJ,
`
`SUMMARY
`
`The disposition of 5-[4-4C]azacytidine, administered i.v.
`as a bolus or continuous
`infusion, was studied in cancer
`patients. After bolus, plasma ‘4Clevels exhibited a multi
`phasic disappearance pattern; half-life (t1,2, /3 phase) =
`3.4 to 6.2 hr. Of ‘4Cin plasma, <2% was associated with 5-
`[4-'4C]azacytidine 30 mm after dose. The ratios of ‘4Clevels
`were:
`red cells/plasma,
`—0.8;leukocytes/plasma,
`1.1 to
`2.3; nucleic acids/leukocytes,
`0.2 to 0.43; sputum/plasma,
`0.05 to 0.17. Urinary excretion (3 days) accounted for 73
`to 98% of ‘@C,<1% in feces. The relative concentration of
`5-azacytidine in plasma with continuous
`infusion stayed
`higher than with bolus; urinary excretion was similar. Fewer
`side effects were observed with continuous
`infusion than
`with bolus. The stability of 5-azacytidine was determined
`in various media at several temperatures by thin layer
`chromatography
`and nuclear magnetic resonance. At 20°
`in Ringer's lactate (pH 6.2), the t1,2was 94 to 100 hr. Stability
`increased with lowering of temperature and pH. From our
`data we conclude that 5-azacytidine should be given by
`continuous infusion rather than as a bolus.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`5-AC,3 a pynimidine analog of cytidine (Chart 1) synthe
`sized4 in 1964 (25), was shown to possess marked antibacte
`nial (7, 24, 29) and cancerostatic properties (29). In mice, 5-
`AC decreased the number of circulating lymphocytes and
`mature bone marrow myeloid cells (30). The compound
`possesses remarkable inhibitory properties against rapidly
`proliferating
`tissues includ ing various experimental neo
`plastic growths (17, 33, 34). 5-AC inhibits the synthesis of
`DNA (17, 27) and RNA (5, 13). The mechanism of action
`probably
`involves phosphorylation,â€(cid:157)
`incorporation
`into
`
`in part by NIH Grants GM14270, GM 10848, and RR00039 and
`I Supported
`USPHS Research Grant CA-03227. Part of this work was presented
`at the Fall
`1974 Meeting of the American Society for Pharmacology
`and Experimental
`Therapeutics, Montreal, Canada (12).
`
`2 To
`whom
`reprint
`requests
`should
`be
`addressed,
`at
`The
`Department
`of
`Medicine, 152 Woodruff Memorial Building, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
`30322.
`3 The
`abbreviations
`used
`are:
`5-AC,
`5-azacytidine
`(4-amino-1-f3-D-ribofu
`ranosyl-s-triazin-2-(lH)-one; NSC- 102816); 5-[â€(cid:157)C)AC,5-[4-'4C)azacytidine;
`TLC, thin-layer chromatography;
`NMR, nuclear magnetic
`resonance.
`4 Cultures
`of
`Streptoverticillium
`ladakanus
`can
`produce
`5-AC
`(2,
`
`9).
`
`S The
`phosphorylation
`of
`5-AC
`is
`catalyzed
`is blocked by cytidine and uridine (16).
`Received August 26, 1975; accepted December 19, 1975.
`
`uridine-cytidine
`
`by
`
`kinase
`
`and
`
`newly synthesized nucleic acids followed by fission of the
`triazine ring (26). It was found that 5-['4C]AC was phospho
`rylated in all leukemic tissues studied (17). Further, the drug
`has been shown to exhibit profound
`antitumor
`activity
`against munine L-1210 leukemiain vitro (17) and in vivo (30),
`against Walker 256 carcinoma (3), and against acute lym
`phoblastic leukemia in AK mice (30).
`it
`Studies of the phase specificity of 5-AC revealed that
`acted predominantly in the S phase of the mitotic cycle (17)
`and was lethal to L-1210 cells grown in tissue culture (17).
`Lloyd et a!. (18) noted that continuous exposure to low
`doses of 5-AC was more effective than was short exposure
`to larger doses and that the drug was relatively inactive in L
`1210 cells maintained in nonproliferating
`state. However,
`there are some suggestions that the drug may not be purely
`cell cycle-phase specific and may impair cell structures
`even in the resting state (23).
`5-AC has been found to be promising in the treatment of
`acute leukemia (1, 11, 14, 15, 35). The apparent
`instability of
`5-AC (26) in solution has necessitated administration
`by
`rapid iv.
`injection.
`In clinical
`trials (6, 15, 20, 21, 31, 32, 35,
`37), this has resulted in severe nausea and vomiting. Kanon
`et a!. (15) found that,
`in children,
`if the drug was infused
`over a period of 10 to 15 mm or given in divided doses,
`gastrointestinal
`toxicity was reduced. Moertel et a!. (21)
`found that, by dividing the dose,
`less nausea and vomiting
`occurred.
`Thus, the in vitro data suggesting that continuous expo
`sure was more effective and the clinical data indicating that
`intolerable gastrointestinal
`toxicity was a frequent side ef
`fect with bolus doses prompted us to neexplore the stability
`of 5-AC in solution. Furthermore, we compared the phanma
`cokinetic data obtained with continuous infusion and single
`injections using 5-['4C]AC in patients with metastatic cancer
`and leukemia.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Patients, whose prior written informed consent was ob
`tamed, were selected for study on the basis of metastatic
`cancer or
`leukemia,
`life expectancy of at
`least 6 weeks,
`normal bone marrow and blood counts (except for leukemic
`patients), normal
`renal
`function, stable hepatic function,
`and no other existing disorder. Liven function tests included
`serum glutamate-oxalacetate transaminase, alkaline phos
`phatase, pnothrombin time, and serum protein. Renal func
`
`APRIL 1976
`
`1453
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0001
`
`

`

`z.H.Israilieta!.
`
`@
`
`NH2
`1*
`N
`
`N
`
`0
`
`N
`
`HOC@@@
`
`HO OH
`
`Chart 1. 5-AC (NSC-102816),*, position of “C.
`
`tion tests included blood urea nitrogen and cneatinine clear
`ance. The details of the patients and the doses administered
`(mg/sq m and pCi) are given in Table 1. After admission,
`each patient was observed during a control period of 1 to 6
`days. This was followed either by a treatment period of 1 day
`(for single bolus injection studies) or 6 days (for continuous
`infusion studies) and a follow-up period of 1 to 3 days. The
`diet was normal except
`that
`the patients were fasted from
`midnight until
`the morning of the treatment period.
`The single i.v. dose of 5-[14C]ACwas given at 8:00 am. For
`continuous
`infusion,
`the dose of 5-['4C]AC was started at
`8:00 a.m. and continued over a 12-hr period. This treatment
`was then followed with 5-AC every 12 hr for 9 doses; other
`medications were allowed after the 1st 12-hr period. After a
`single i.v. dose, 10-mI samples of hepaninized blood (with
`1000 units of bovine lung hepanin; Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo,
`Mich.) were obtained at predetermined intervals and imme
`diately chilled in ice. Plasma was separated by centnifuga
`tion (500 x g, 30 mm, 0-4°).Urine collections were made
`every 4 hr on the 1st day and every 24 hr on the 2nd and 3rd
`day. Daily collections of feces were made for several days.
`Vomitus,
`if any, was collected; specimens of sputum were
`obtained at specified times.
`In 1 case, leukocytes were also
`isolated (see below). With the continuous infusion protocol,
`20-mI blood samples (hepaninized) were collected at various
`time intervals after the beginning of
`infusion of 5-[14C]AC.
`Urine collections were made every 2 hr for the 1st 12 hr and
`then every 3 hr for the next 12 hn; thereafter, 24-hr collec
`tions were obtained for the next 3 days. Feces collections
`were made for 0 to 24 and 24 to 48 hr. In 1 case, a sample of
`cerebrospinal
`fluid was also obtained. All biological sam
`pIes were stored below 0°and analyzed as soon as possible.
`
`Dose Formulation
`
`5-AC was obtained in a dosage form consisting either of
`(a) 50 mg of the drug and 100 mg of polyvinylpyrrolidone
`(plasdone-C-1 5), or (b) a 1:1 mixture of the drug with manni
`tol for iv. use (Division of Cancer Treatment, National Can
`cer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Md.). The labeled compound
`(5-['4C]AC)6 was dissolved in distilled water, and the solu
`tion was sterilized by passing through a disposable sterile
`filter
`(Swinnex 0.22 @m;Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.)
`
`I 5-(â€(cid:157)CJAC
`(Lot
`No.
`219-3C,
`49.1
`mCi/mmole)
`was
`synthesized
`by
`Mon
`santo Research Corp., Dayton, Ohio, and was supplied by the Drug Research
`and Development Chemotherapy
`Branch, National Cancer
`Institute, NIH,
`Bethesda, Md. The radiochemical purity (>95%) was shown by the manufac
`turer by descending
`paper chromatography
`in 1-butanol
`saturated with water
`(RF0.22). The labeled material as well as carrier were stored at —20°.
`
`and added to carrier 5-AC dissolved in sterile distilled water.
`This final solution was either injected immediately (in 8 to 10
`mm) as a bolus or added to 500 to 1000 ml of Ringer's
`lactate (Hartmann ‘sMcGaw Laboratories, Glendale, Calif.)
`for continuous
`infusion. The 1st 100 ml of solution were
`injected over a 20-mm period and the remainder
`in the next
`11 hrand40min.
`An aliquot of the dose solution was tested in rats for the
`absence of pyrogens (19). Male Wistar rats (197 to 217 g, 4 in
`each group) were given s.c. injections (20 mI/kg) of either:
`Group A, sterile distilled water; Group B, a 20% suspension
`of brewers' yeast in sterile water; or Group C, 1.4 x 10@M 5-
`[14C]AC (0.3 pCi/animal)
`in sterile water passed through a
`sterile Swinnex filter. Rectal temperatures were measured
`by a thermocouple at 0, 4, and 24 hr after injections. The
`average temperatures for Groups A, B, and C for 0, 4, and 24
`hr were as follows: Group A, 37.1°,37.5°,36.9°;Group B,
`36.6°,38.1°,37.6°;and Group C, 37.1°,37.8°,369°. The
`stability of
`the solution of 5-AC in Ringer's lactate was
`determined prior to infusion (see below).
`
`TLC
`
`TLC was carried out on: (a) Silica Gel G-coated glass
`plates without
`fluorescent
`indicator
`(Analtech Uniplate,
`Newark, Del.), and (b) Silca Gel G-coated plastic sheets with
`fluorescent
`indicator
`(Eastman Chromagram 6060). The
`plates were
`developed
`in
`System 1
`(1-butanol:-
`ethanol:waten, 49:11:19, v/v/v) at room temperature. Radi
`ochromatography was carried out on glass plates and 1-cm
`segments of silica gel were scraped and transferred into
`counting vials; 0.5 ml of methanol was added prior to count
`ing fluid. 5-AC and related compounds
`(1 p1 of 3.5 mM
`aqueous solutions) were spotted on fluorescent
`plates
`(6060) and, after development, the spots were visualized by
`quenching of fluorescence under UV light (254 nm), The RF
`values for 5-AC, 5-azacytosine, and 5-azauracil were 0.35,
`0.24, and 0.22, respectively.
`
`Measurement of Radioactivity in Biological Materials and
`Extracts
`
`Aliquots (up to 2 ml) of plasma or urine were mixed with
`18 ml of counting fluid (prepared by mixing 7 g of PPO, 0.36
`g of POPOP,
`200 ml of Beckman
`Biosolv BBS-3,
`and 1 liter
`of toluene). They were counted alone or in the presence of
`known amounts of 5-['4C]AC in a Beckman LS-255 liquid
`scintillation spectrometer
`(Beckman Instruments,
`Inc. , Ful
`lerton, Calif.) (counting efficiency, 90%). Similarly, ‘4Cwas
`measured in vomitus, sputum, WBC, and spinal
`fluid;
`for
`ABC, 0.3-mI aliquots were oxidized in a Beckman-Harvey
`combustion instrument, and the resulting ‘4C02was trapped
`in “Harveycanbon-14 cocktailâ€(cid:157)(A. J. Harvey Instrument
`Corp., Hillsdale, N.J.) (15 ml; counting efficiency, 70 to 75%).
`Recoveries (85 to 90%) of ‘4Cafter combustion were deter
`mined by oxidizing known amounts of 5-['4C]AC added to
`sucrose.Feces were homogenized with 100 to 500 ml of
`95% ethanol. Ten-mi aliquots were centrifuged and 1 to 2 ml
`of the clear supernatant were counted. This procedure was
`found to be satisfactory since practically no radioactivity
`was detected in the residue upon oxidation.
`
`1454
`
`CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 36
`
`
`
`cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from
`
`on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancer
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0002
`
`

`

`Disposition of 5-AC in Humans
`
`5-('@CJACPa
`
`Table 1
`Description of patients anddoses of
`
`tient°Age(yr)Wt
`m)Diagnosis1
`
`area(sq
`
`(kg)Surfacem)Dose
`
`(mgi
`sq
`
`Adenocarcinomaof lung
`200
`Adenocarcinomaof lung
`200
`Acute myeloblastic leukemia
`250
`150Mesothelioma
`
`103
`66
`56
`67186
`
`2.27
`1.70
`1.67
`190150
`
`23 45
`
`49
`44
`27
`Melanoma6
`2173
`44
`
`cell carcinoma of lung
`Acute myeloblastic leukemia
`50
`Adenocarcinomaof colon
`75Squamous
`
`64
`2459
`
`46
`521.80
`
`1.50
`1.5025
`
`78
`
`50
`
`a Patients
`
`1 to
`
`5 received
`
`5-['4C]AC
`
`as
`
`a single
`
`iv.
`
`bolus;
`
`the
`
`total
`
`dose
`
`of
`
`5-AC
`
`per
`
`week
`
`was twice the indicated value. For Patients6 to 8, who received5-['4C]ACby continuous
`infusion overa 12-hrperiod,the 24-hrdoseof 5-ACwastwice the indicated value;the total
`dose of 5-AC administered in 1 week was 10 times the 12-hr dose. Patients 1 and 2
`received25 j.@Ci;all others were given 50 @Ciof the labeleddrug. Patients3, 4, and 8 were
`females.The creatinine clearancesin patients 1 to 5 and 7 were 80, 124,119,90, 73, and
`101 mlimin,
`respectively.
`
`Measurement of 5-[4C]AC in Plasma
`
`Fresh plasma (3 ml) obtained from patients receiving 5-
`[‘4C]ACwas diluted with 5 ml of 10@ M Tnis buffer, pH 6.5.
`Then, 3 drops of 10% w/v oxalic acid were added (final pH, 6
`to 6.5). After shaking,
`the mixtures were immediately shell
`frozen and lyophilized (VirTis Co., Gandiner, N.Y.). The resi
`due was tnitunated with 10 ml of methanol, sonically ex
`tracted for 5 mm, and centrifuged for 10 mm at room tem
`perature. The precipitate was reextracted with 10 ml of
`methanol. The final residue was discarded, since essentially
`no ‘4Cwas found in it. The methanol extracts were pooled
`and evaporated to dryness in a vacuum at room tempera
`tune, and the resulting residue was redissolved in 1 ml of
`methanol. Aliquots of this solution were chromatographed
`(Silica Gel G-coated plates, without
`fluorescent
`indicator;
`AnaltechUniplate)usingSystem 1.
`
`Isolation of Leukocytes and Nucleic Acids
`
`Leukocytes were isolated by the method of Hirsch (10),
`Aliquots ofblood samples (10 mI)from Patient 4were mixed
`with 10 ml of
`ice-cold 3% w/v dextran (Phanmacia Fine
`Chemicals,
`Inc., Piscataway, N.J.; MW. 400,000) in 0.85%
`NaCI containing 100 units of hepanin per ml, The mixture
`was kept at 0°,and the ABC were allowed to sediment
`for 20
`to 30 mm. The leukocyte-nich suspension was aspirated and
`centrifuged (10 mm, 2000 x g, 4°),The resulting pellet was
`washed with 10 ml of 0.85% NaCI as above, Contaminating
`ABC were lysed for 10 mm at 0°(in 5-mI
`lyse solution
`consisting of 1 g sodium citrate dihydrate and 2.5 g NaCI in
`1 liter of distilled water; final pH adjusted to 5 with HCI). An
`equal volume of neutralizing solution (7 g of sodium citrate
`dihydrate and 15 g of NaCI in 1 liter of distilled water) was
`added, and the WBC were centrifuged as above and washed
`twice with 2 ml of 0.85% NaCI solution. The pellet was then
`suspended in 1 ml of 0.85% NaCI solution and weighed. An
`aliquot of this suspension was counted and was found to
`have 98% leukemic blast cells, and another aliquot
`(0.3 ml)
`
`was mixed with 0.3 ml of 0.8 M perchlonic acid at 0°.After
`standing for 10 mm the mixture was centrifuged (27,000 x g
`for 10 mm at 0°).The supennatant was decanted and ali
`quots were counted. The precipitate was washed twice with
`0.2 M perchlonic acid (5 ml) at 0°and resuspended in 1 ml of
`0.8 M penchloric acid. After heating (100°for 20 mm) and
`centnifugation, aliquots of the resulting supernatants were
`counted.
`
`Isolation and Measurement of [‘4C]Ureafrom the Urine of
`a Patient Receiving 5-['4C]AC
`
`To 2 ml of urine (Patient 1) were added 2 ml of an aqueous
`solution of urea (100 mg/mI)
`followed by 1.5 ml of 95%
`ethanol. The mixture was heated (100°for 5 mm) and then
`quickly filtered while hot. The filtrate was cooled to room
`temperature and again filtered. The remaining precipitate
`was washed 4 times with 1 ml of hot ethanol. The combined
`filtrate and washings were evaporated to dryness in a vac
`uum at 60°.The residue was tniturated with hot ethanol and
`filtered. The filtrate was cooled to —20°,and the resulting
`crystals of urea were collected by filtration. After 2 recnystal
`lizations from ethanol, urea was dried in a vacuum at 80°.An
`aliquot of the product
`from each crystallization was sub
`jected to TLC on Silica Gel G glass plates and developed in
`System 1. Segments of silica gel (4 mm) were scraped and
`counted. For visualization,
`the plates were dried overnight,
`sprayed with a solution of 0.05% bromcnesol green (in 95%
`ethanol, adjusted to pH 6.5 with dilute NaOH), followed by
`exposure of the plates to HCI vapors. A blue spot (RF0.46)
`corresponding to urea could be briefly seen against a yellow
`background.
`The presence of ‘4Cassociated with urea was specifically
`determined by treating urea samples isolated from urine
`with unease and measuring the evolved ‘4C02(8). A twin
`armed Warbung flask was charged as follows: body, 3 ml of
`urea solution (1.9 mg/mI)
`in 5 mM phosphate, pH 6.5, con
`taming 0.5 mM disodium EDTA; 1st side arm, unease (pne
`pared from Jack Bean meal) on water for control; 2nd side
`
`APRIL 1976
`
`1455
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0003
`
`

`

`z. H.Israi!ieta!.
`
`arm, 0.5 ml 1 N HCI; center well, paper wick plus 0.5 ml 1 N
`NaOH. The flask was tightly stoppered and the contents of
`the 1st side arm were tipped and mixed with the urea solu
`tion. After a 2-hr incubation at 37°,HCI was added to the
`reaction mixture to release ‘@CO2.After 24 hn, the contents
`of the central well were transferred into a scintillation vial.
`The well was washed with several small aliquots of water
`and the washings were also transferred into the scintillation
`vial and mixed with counting fluid, and ‘4Cwas measured.
`
`Measurement of Partition Coefficient and Binding of 5-
`[‘@C]AC
`
`The partition coefficient of 5-['4C]AC was measured at
`room temperature between M/15 SOrensen buffer, pH 7.4
`(28), and various organic solvents (chloroform, n-heptane,
`and peanut oil). An aqueous solution of 5-[14C]AC(10 ml, 10
`i.&g, 0.01 MCi) was shaken with buffer-saturated
`organic
`solvents (20 ml) for 40 mm. After the phases were separated
`by centnifugation, ‘4Cwas measured in 2 ml of the buffer
`phase, 1 ml of peanut oil, and 2 ml of chloroform on n
`heptane (after evaporation).
`The binding of 5-[14C]AC to human albumin was meas
`ured at 37°and pH 7.4 by 2 methods: (a) equilibrium
`dialysis, and (b) molecular sieve (22).
`Equilibrium Dialysis. Visking dialysis tubing (VWR Scien
`tific, Atlanta, Ga.; 5/8 inch, size 20) was washed twice and
`then kept in distilled water for at least 24 hr and blotted dry.
`In 1 set of experiments, 2 ml of 5% w/v human serum albu
`mm (crystallized , Pentex; Miles Laboratories, Kankakee,
`Ill.) were placed inside the dialysis bags. These were then
`placed in test
`tubes containing 10 ml of Sorensen buffer
`containing 100 @g,0.01 @tCiof 5-['4C]AC (freshly prepared).
`In another set of experiments, 200 @g(0.02 pCi) of 5-['4C]AC
`were added to 2 ml of albumin solution, which was then
`placed in the dialysis bag and dialyzed in 10 ml of Sorensen
`buffer.
`In these experiments, equilibration was achieved by
`shaking in air (100 cycles/mm; Metabolyte Bath, New Bruns
`wick, N. J.) at 37°for 4 hr. Leakage of protein through
`the dialysis tubing was tested with 40% w/v aqueous tn
`chloroacetic acid. Radioactivity in the inside and outside
`phases was determined and the binding was calculated.
`Molecular Sieve Method. Since 5-AC is not very stable in
`solutions at 37°,the binding of the drug to human serum
`albumin (5% w/v in Sorensen buffer, pH7.4) at 37°was also
`measured by the molecular sieve method (which consumes
`much less time). The procedure used was essentially that
`described by Mu et a!. (22).
`
`Stability Studies
`
`The stability of 5-AC in various media at several tempera
`tunes was studied by 2 methods:
`(a) TLC using 5-['4C]AC,
`and (b) NMR using 5-AC. For Method a, the compound was
`dissolved in water on buffer at various pH's and stoned at
`appropriate temperatures (0-37°)for specific times. Aliquots
`were analyzed by quantitative TLC (silica gel plates, System
`1) as described above. Radioactivity
`in the zone come
`sponding to 5-['4C]AC was determined. These values (as
`percentages) were plotted versus time and half-lives (t112's)
`were calculated.
`
`For Method b, 5-AC was dissolved in the appropriate
`medium and NMR studies were carried out at 9-37°on a
`Bruker Scientific HFX-90 spectrometer
`(Bruker Scientific,
`Inc., Elmsfond, N. Y.). The spectra were taken at a width of
`120 Hz and were time averaged over multiple scans (Nicolet
`1074 computer). Tetramethylsilane and benzaldehyde in a 5-
`mm coaxial capillary served as external references. The rate
`of decrease (relative to the reference peak) in the height of
`the C-6 ring proton resonance of 5-AC was taken to be the
`rate of decomposition. The relative height of
`resonance
`peak for C-6 proton was calculated (sample peak height/
`reference peak height). Multiple regression analysis of the
`data was performed using 1st-order
`rate kinetics, and t112's
`at a 95% confidence level were determined.
`NMR spectra at 40°were taken on a Vanian A-60A spec
`trometer
`(Vanian Associates, Palo Alto, Calif.). The rate of
`decrease of the area under the C-6 ring proton resonance of
`5-AC (relative to the reference resonance) was assumed to
`be the rate of decomposition of 5-AC. The t112'swere deter
`mined as described above.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Studies In Patients
`
`Single i.v. Dose. Five patients received- 5-['4C]AC as a
`single bolus dose; plasma levels of ‘4C(expressed as @g
`equivalents of 5-[14C]AC pen ml of plasma) are shown in
`Table 2. The data were analyzed by computer, using a
`program developed by Dr. William Olson (Department of
`Medicine, Emory University). The plasma ‘4Clevels (Cu, 0 to
`12 hn) fit the expression:
`cp= Ae@°'+ Be_k@@
`
`where A and B are the intercepts and k0 and k8 are the
`slopes. The calculated values forA and B, the t12 of a and f3
`phases, and the apparent volumes of distribution (V,@)are
`given in Table 2. The t112of distribution
`phase (a) ranged
`from 16 to 33 mm, the t112of fJ phase ranged from 3.4 to 6.2
`hm,and Vd ranged from 0.58 to 1.15 liters/kg.
`Preliminary studies indicate that
`the concentration of 5-
`[‘4C]ACin plasma declined much fasten than total ‘4C;thus
`in 1 patient (Patient 1), at 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm after dose,
`the levels of 5-['4C]AC were 40, 37, 27, and 7%, respectively,
`of
`the total ‘4Cin plasma. After 30 mm the values for 5-
`[‘4C]ACwere <2% of ‘4Cin plasma. At least 2 metabolites
`and/or decomposition
`products of 5-AC were found in
`plasma by TLC.
`The ratio of ‘@Clevels in ABC to plasma was about 0.8
`(ABC/plasma ‘@Cconcentration ratios for Patient 3 at 5, 15,
`and 30 mm and 1 hr were 0.81, 0.82, 0.85, and 0.80, nespec
`tively). The ratio of concentration
`of ‘4Cin leukocytes to
`plasma ranged from 1.1 to 2.3, while ‘4Cassociated with
`nucleic acids of WBC was 20 to 43% of ‘4Cin leukocyte
`(Table 3).
`The level of 14Csecreted into the sputum was from 5 to
`17% of plasma concentrations;
`the vomitus
`contained
`<0.1% of the dose (Table 2). The patients vomited about 6
`times (range, 2 to 11) starting 1 hr after the dose (until 14 hr
`in some cases). The vomitus varied in colon from light yellow
`
`1456
`
`CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 36
`
`Downloaded from
`
`on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0004
`
`

`

`Table2
`
`Plasma levels of 4Cin patients after administration of5-('@CJACConcentration
`
`pg/mI).
`
`of ‘4C(5-AC equivalent,
`
`fusionTimeâ€(cid:157)Patient
`
`After single iv. doseb
`
`.
`
`During
`
`and
`
`after
`
`continuous
`
`iv.
`
`in
`
`85
`
`1Patient
`
`2
`
`Patient 3
`
`Patient 4
`
`Patient 5
`
`Patient 6
`
`Patient 7
`
`Patient
`
`Disposition of 5-AC in Humans
`
`mm11.910.6
`13.910mm9.39.715
`
`mm8.99.3
`0.3230
`0.3845
`mm8.08.6
`mm7.07.8
`8.01
`hr6.57.2
`0.442
`hr4.66.1
`0.793
`hr3.75.1
`4.74
`hr2.84.3
`0.785
`hr2.53.86
`hr2.23.2
`0.768
`hr1.5
`0.6212
`hr1.01.7
`1.33@l6hr0.4
`1.220
`hr0.224
`0.1232hr0.1148
`hr0.440.44
`
`hr0.46
`
`15.7
`
`12.1
`9.8
`
`7.1
`5.0
`4.2
`3.8
`
`2.3
`
`0.7
`
`10.2
`
`7.5
`
`6.3
`5.2
`
`3.9
`
`2.8
`
`1.7
`
`0.11
`
`0.2
`
`0.89
`
`0.61
`
`8.5
`
`6.1
`4.4
`
`3.0
`
`2.0
`1.2
`0.61
`
`0.07
`
`0.23
`0.22
`
`0.22
`0.28
`
`039
`
`0.38
`0.44
`0,61e
`
`0.13
`
`0.45
`0.39
`
`0.39
`
`0.50
`0.44
`0.93'
`
`0.14
`
`continuous
`
`infusion,
`
`it
`
`is
`
`from
`
`start
`
`of
`
`‘5For
`infusion.
`
`time
`the
`dose,
`iv.
`single
`For doses, see Table 1.
`
`indicated
`
`is after
`
`drug
`
`administration;
`
`for
`
`6 Computer
`
`analysis
`
`of
`
`the
`
`0-
`
`to
`
`12-hr
`
`data
`
`of
`
`Patients
`
`distributionphase(a)forthese patientswere:Patient1,33 mm;Patient2,28 mm;Patient3, 16mm;Patient4, 22 mm;
`and Patient5, 17mm.Thet2's for /3phasewere: 4.7,5.5,3.4,6.2,and 3.5 hr, respectively.Thecorrespondingapparent
`volumesof distribution were 0.62,0.58,0.60, 1.15,and 0.58 liters/kg, respectively.The vomitus contained 0.01,0.09,
`0.03, and 0.02% of dose of ‘4Cin Patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; ‘@C(5-AC equivalent) in the sputum obtained at the
`indicatedtimewas as follows:Patient1, 1.5 hr, 0.27 jig/mI; Patient2, 0.5 hr, 0.8 @g/ml,and 1 hr, 0.55 @tg/mI;and
`Patient 3 1 hr, 1.22 @,tgiml.
`C Infusion
`stopped.
`
`1
`
`to
`
`5
`
`fits
`
`a
`
`2-compartment
`
`model
`
`(r
`
`>
`
`0.95).
`
`The
`
`t112's
`
`of
`
`Table 3
`Distribution of “Cin leukocytes°and nucleic acids isolatedfromthe
`
`
`blood of a leukemicpatient (Patient4)after administrationof5-(‘@CjAC‘4C
`
`(5-AC equivalent)
`
`levels
`
`Time after
`
`dose (hr)cytes1
`
`Plasma (@.Lg/
`ml)
`
`Leukocytes
`(/Lg/g)
`
`‘4Cin nucleic
`acids as % of
`‘4Cin leuko
`
`272
`314
`206
`3024
`
`43a
`
`6.3
`5.2
`3.9
`2.8
`0.9
`
`98%
`
`leukemic
`
`blast
`
`cells.
`
`7.0
`6.6
`4.3
`4.0
`2.1
`
`to green; pH ranged from 7.5 to 7.9. Nausea was pro
`nounced and was partially controlled by chlorpnomazine on
`prochlonpenazine.
`Most ofthe administered ‘4Cappeared in urine: 69 to 91%
`and 73 to 98% in 1 and 3 days, respectively, while less than
`1% of
`the dose was present
`in the feces (Table 4). The
`calculated amount of ‘4Cremaining in the body showed
`considerable individual variations in these patients;
`in 1
`case about 27% of the dose was apparently present even
`after3 days.
`for the 1st
`The renal clearance of ‘4C(drug + metabolite)
`12 hr after bolus dose varied from 74 to 210 mI/mm (Table
`4).
`
`Table 4
`5-Time
`Cumulatiye urinary excretion of ‘4Cin patients adminl
`(‘@C)ACas single iv. doseâ€(cid:157)‘stered
`inPatient
`of dose excreted
`
`50-4
`(hr)%
`
`1
`
`Patient
`2
`
`Patient
`3
`
`Patient
`4Patient
`
`22
`44
`38
`60
`50
`73
`58
`67
`0-8
`66
`58
`82
`71
`78
`0-12
`69
`0-24
`69
`91
`85
`90
`71
`77
`94
`93
`96
`0-48
`73
`8047
`95
`95
`98
`0-7244
`aPercentageof doseof ‘@Cexcretedin feceswasasfollows:
`Patient1, 0.01(0 to 2 days);Patient2, 0.36 (0 to 1 day);Patient3,
`0.98 (0 to 2 days); and Patient 4, <0.01 (0 to 2 days). The renal
`clearance(mlimin) of ‘4C(5-['4CJACand metabolites)for 0- to 4-, 4-
`to 8-, and8- to 12-hrintervalswereas follows:PatientI , 107,128,
`and 210; Patient2, 115,118,and 160; Patient 3, 125,178,and 127;
`Patient4, 74, 175,and 93; Patient 5, 127,77, and 79.
`
`Urea was isolated from the urine of Patient 1 and was
`crystallized twice from 95% ethanol. By TLC, this fraction
`was shown to be contaminated with materials cocrystallized
`with urea.
`[‘4C]Uneawas quantitatively measured by con
`verting it to ‘4C02by unease.Of the excreted ‘4Cin 0- to 4-, 4-
`to 8- to 12-, and 12- to 24-hr unines, 0.8, 1.6, 2.9, and 5.7%,
`respectively, was associated with urea.
`Continuous Infusion. Three patients received 5-['4CJAC
`
`APRIL 1976
`
`1457
`
`
`
`Downloaded from on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0005
`
`

`

`z. H.!srai!ieta!.
`by continuous infusion. Plasma levels and urinary excretion
`of ‘4Care presented in Tables 2 and 5. In 1 case (Patient 7, at
`6 hr after beginning of infusion)
`the spinal
`fluid to plasma
`concentration ratio of ‘4Cwas 0.08. At 15 and 30 mm and 1,
`2, 4, and 6 hr after beginning of infusion, plasma 5-['4C]AC
`levels were 70, 46, 42, 34, 15, and 13%, respectively, of the
`total ‘@Cconcentration in plasma. Urinary excretion of ‘4C(0
`to 24 hn) amounted to 85, 83, and 94% of the dose (Table 5)
`in the 3 patients, respectively.
`
`Partition Coefficient and Binding of 5-['4C]AC
`
`The partition coefficient of 5-['4C]AC (concentration in the
`organic phase/concentration
`in the aqueous phase) was
`found to be <0.005 for all 3 systems studied.
`The binding of 5-['4C]AC to 5% w/v human albumin in
`Sorensen buffer at pH 7.4, 37°,was found to be <1% both by
`equilibrium dialysis and molecular sieve procedures.
`
`StabIlIty of 5-AC in Solutions
`
`Freshly prepared solutions of 5-['4C}AC were incubated in
`various media at several temperatures and analyzed by TLC.
`For NMR the solutions of 5-AC were allowed to remain in the
`probe for the duration of the experiment.
`TLC Method. Almost all of the spotted radioactivity at time
`0 was found to be in the zone corresponding to 5-AC. This
`
`value was assumed to be 100%. The radioactivity (as per
`centage of control) associated with zones corresponding to
`5-[14C]ACwas measured at 1/2,1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 hr after
`incubations at 0°,25°,and 37°in various media. The decom
`position of 5-['4C]AC followed 1st-order kinetics;
`the t12's of
`decay are given in Table 6. 5-AC was more stable in Tnis
`
`Table 5
`Cumulative urinary excretion of @Cin patients during and after
`5-('4CJACTimeâ€(cid:157)
`continuous
`infusion
`of
`of dose excreted inâ€(cid:157)
`
`(hr)%
`80-2
`
`% of dose
`infused
`
`0-4
`0-6
`0-8
`
`0-122351.60-24
`
`39
`54
`69
`100
`
`Patient6
`3.1
`10.9
`20.8
`30.2
`50.7
`
`Patient 7
`5.0
`11.0
`13.0
`27.6
`46.4
`
`0-48
`0-72
`0-96
`0-12085.4
`
`82.7
`91.7
`94.7
`96.2
`96.9
`
`Patient
`21.8
`36.6
`42.4
`42.7
`
`93.5
`97.2
`98.4
`99.0
`99.5
`
`a Time
`
`from
`
`beginning
`
`of
`
`infusion
`
`(lasting
`
`12
`
`hr).
`
`1@The
`
`renal
`
`clearances
`
`(mlimin)
`
`of
`
`‘4C (5-['4C]AC
`
`plus
`
`metabo
`
`lites)for 0-to 4-and 4-to 8-hr intervalswereasfollows: Patient6, 73
`and 96; Patient7, 88 and 103;Patient8, 84 and 92, respectively.
`
`Table6
`Stability studies of 5-AC
`Tern
`
`Mediumâ€(cid:157)Methodpera
`pointsDistilled
`waterNMR40°6.54.4
`0.6'@15EDTA
`(10â€(cid:157)M)/N2â€(cid:157)NMR406.38.5
`2.0'19Tris
`buffer(102 M)-EDTA(10@NMR406.36.3
`1.211M)Ringer's
`
`lactateNMR406.25.6
`1.3@13Ringer's
`lactate-EDTA(10â€(cid:157)M)iNMR406.25.8
`1.09N2Human
`
`turepHt@,2
`
`plasma(fresh)'NMR377.4°5.2
`0.814Human
`plasma(fresh)'TLC377,4°1
`.45Human
`plasma(stored)'NMR377,405,4
`0.812Human
`
`plasma(stored@TLC377.4â€(cid:157)2.05SOrensen
`buffer(Mi15)TLC377.45.05Sorensen
`
`
`buffer(M/15)TLC257.4175Tnis
`
`buffer (102M)TLC256.3686Ringer's
`lactateTLC256.2657Human
`plasma(fresh)'TLC257.4°7.05Human
`
`urineTLC256.5°707Ringer's
`lactateNMR206.294
`532Ringer's
`lactateNMR206.2100
`774Tris
`lactateNMR96.2170
`
`buffer(102M)TLC06.35287Human
`plasma(fresh)'TLC07.4â€(cid:157)537Human
`
`urineTLC06.5°2887
`
`625Ringer's
`
`of
`
`of decomposi
`tion of 5-AC(hr)â€(cid:157)No.
`±
`±
`±
`
`±
`±
`
`±
`
`±
`
`±
`
`±
`
`±
`
`a Concentration
`
`of
`
`5-AC
`
`=
`
`30
`
`mM
`
`(NMR)
`
`and
`
`5-['4C]AC
`
`=
`
`3.5
`
`m@i
`
`(TLC).
`
`S Each
`
`t112 determination
`
`carried out for 170to 190mm (0.5to 2.0 half-lives).Forthe TLC, incubationswere carried out up to
`48 hr.
`
`represents
`
`a single
`
`experiment.
`
`In
`
`the
`
`NMR
`
`studies,
`
`experiments
`
`were
`
`C p112
`
`±
`
`95%
`
`confidence
`
`level.
`
`EDTA.
`disodium
`aqueous
`d EDTA,
`e The R2 values for these 2 determinations
`I Fresh
`plasma
`for
`each
`experiment
`was
`stored
`at 0°for 1 to 10 weeks.
`U pH
`was
`not
`controlled.
`
`were between
`obtained
`from
`
`(NMR).
`>0.96
`for others,
`0.90 and 0.93;
`different
`individuals.
`Stored
`plasma
`was
`
`1458
`
`CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 36
`
`Downloaded from
`
`on October 5, 2021. © 1976 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org
`
`
`Research.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1043-0006
`
`

`

`buffer (pH 6.3, 102 M) or Ringer's lactate at pH 6.2 and least
`stable in fresh hepaninized plasma.
`NMR Method. The resonance due to the proton at C-6 of
`5-AC occurred at 8.7 ppm (singlet) in D2Osolution at 20°;the
`aldehyde proton of benzaldehyde resonated at 9.8 ppm
`relative to the reference,
`tetramethylsilane in the capillary.
`In Ringer's lactate at 20°,the resonances due to C-6 and
`benzaldehyde protons occurred at 9.0 and 9.9 ppm, respec
`tively. These chemical shifts varied slightly with temperature
`and the composition of the medium. The decomposition of
`5-AC (in D2O)is accompanied by the progressive disappear
`ance of the resonance at 8.7 ppm and the appearance of a
`new peak of 8.5 ppm (Chart 2). The addition of formic acid
`to the partially decomposed solution of 5-AC increased the
`intens

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket