throbber
J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 2351-2358
`
`2351
`
`agent 1 h prior to the injection of carrageenan into one of the hind
`paws. The rats were sacrificed 4 h after administration of the
`drug, at which time both of the hind paws were excised and
`weighed separately. The potencies of the test agents relative to
`phenylbutazone were determined from dose-response plots of the
`the nonin-
`percent increase in weight of the inflamed paw over
`flamed paw. Usually at least three doses, using 6 rats/dose, were
`employed in constructing the plots.
`(c) Inhibition of Phenylquinone-Induced Writhing, The
`assay was performed according to the procedure described in a
`publication23 from these laboratories. Thus, 18-20-g male mice
`were given the test substance orally 20 min prior to an intra-
`peritoneal injection of phenylquinone. The mice were observed
`for the next 10 min for writhing, and the potencies, relative to
`aspirin, were determined as in (b) using 8-10 mice/dose.
`
`Acknowledgment. We thank W. H. Rooks II and A1
`Tomolonis for providing the antiinflammatory and anal-
`gesic data and D. M. Green for the synthesis of some of
`the intermediates.
`
`1 (Rj = OCH3, X = CH2, R2 = H, methyl ester),
`Registry No.
`104156-24-3; la, 54225-54-6; lb, 104156-09-4; lc, 72568-22-0; Id,
`104156-10-7; le, 104156-11-8; le (ethyl ester), 104156-27-6; le (Rj
`le (diazo ketone), 104156-26-5; If,
`= 7-OCH3), 104156-28-7;
`104156-12-9; lg, 55689-65-1; lh, 61220-69-7; li, 104156-13-0; 2a,
`58452-78-1; 2b, 58452-80-5; 2c, 72568-23-1; 2d, 104156-14-1; 3,
`104156-15-2; 5a, 104156-16-3; 5b, 104156-17-4; 6a, 104156-31-2;
`isomer 2),
`isomer 1), 104156-29-8; 6a (stilbene,
`6a (stilbene,
`104156-30-1; 6b, 104156-22-1; 6b (stilbene), 104156-20-9; 6b (R2
`= CH3), 104156-21-0; 6b (diacid chloride), 104156-23-2; 6c,
`2-
`104156-18-5; 3-0HCC6H4CH2C02H-Li, 104156-19-6;
`H3C02CC6H4CH2Br, 2417-73-4; 2-H3C02CC6H4CH2PPh3+Br,
`60494-73-7; 2-H0C6H4CH2C02CH2CH3, 41873-65-8;
`2-
`(2-carbomethoxy-3-methoxy ben-
`H3CC6H4C02CH3, 89-71-4;
`zyl)triphenylphosphonium bromide, 104172-27-2; methyl 2-
`methoxy-6-methylbenzoate, 79383-44-1; 7-methoxy-10,ll-di-
`hydro-5R-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-one-2-carboxylic acid,
`64717-08-4; 7-methoxy-10,ll-dihydro-5fi-dibenzo[a,d]cyclo-
`hepten-5-one-2-carboxylic acid, 104156-25-4; 8-methoxy-10,ll-
`dihydro-57f-dibenzo[o,d]cyclohepten-5-one-2-carboxylic acid,
`64453-89-0; aldose reductase, 9028-31-3.
`
`Furanose-Pyranose Isomerization of Reduced Pyrimidine and Cyclic Urea
`Ribosides
`
`HO
`
`OH
`
`James A. Kelley,* * John S. Driscoll,* John J. McCormack,* Jeri S. Roth,* and Victor E. Marquez**
`Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer
`Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, and Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine,
`and Vermont Regional Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401. Received December 11, 1985
`Tetrahydrouridine (THU, 2) and other fully reduced cyclic urea
`ribofuranosyl nucleosides undergo a rapid, acid-
`catalyzed isomerization to their more stable ribopyranosyl form. This isomerization is characterized by a change
`in spectral properties and by a greater than 10-fold decrease in potency for those nucleosides that act as potent
`inhibitors of cytidine deaminase in their ribofuranose form.
`l-(/3-D-Ribopyranosyl)hexahydropyrimidin-2-one (7)
`was synthesized and used in conjuction with its furanose isomer 6 as a model compound for more extensive  
`and
`13C NMR, mass spectral, and kinetic studies of this isomerization. The 0.4 & upfield shift and 4-Hz increase in the
`JV|2. coupling constant for the pyranose anomeric proton in the   NMR spectrum is indicative of a pyranose >3-0
`conformation in which the aglycon and C-2' and C-4' hydroxyls are equatorial. The mass spectra of trimethylsilylated
`pyranose nucleosides also show a characteristic large shift in the m/z 204-217 abundance and the appearance of
`two new rearrangement ions at M - 133 and M - 206. For furanose 6 the rate of isomerization is pH and temperature
`dependent with pyranose 7 predominating by a factor of 6-9 at equilibrium. At pH 1 and 37 °C, furanose 6 has
`an initial half-life of less than 12 min. Accordingly, this isomerization may explain the observed lack of enhanced
`ara-C levels in studies evaluating the oral administration of an ara-C and THU combination to species with an acidic
`stomach content.
`Efficient in vivo inhibition of cytidine deaminase (CDA)
`has long been sought as a means of improving the thera-
`peutic activity of the antitumor agent ara-C (la) by ov-
`ercoming its rapid deamination to inactive ara-U (lb).1
`The widespread distribution of CDA in many of the body’s
`tissues, among them the liver, kidney, small intestine, and
`this rapid catabolism of ara-C and other
`blood, ensures
`cytidine analogues.2 Moreover, significant CDA activity
`is encountered in human hematopoietic tissue as well as
`in acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.3,4
`One of the most potent and well-studied CDA inhibitors
`has been tetrahydrouridine (THU, 2).5 However, use of
`THU in combination with ara-C, both in animals and
`humans, has produced disappointing results for the most
`part. There has been little therapeutic advantage observed
`for this combination because of the parallel increase in
`toxicity associated with the resulting high plasma levels
`of ara-C.6,7
`Use of intraperitoneal (ip) combinations of THU and
`ara-C against several in vivo mouse
`tumors, which were
`selected for their high levels of CDA activity, produced a
`
`la, X = NH2
`b, X = OH
`significant increase in lifespan (ILS) against only the as-
`cites form of S180J cells.8 Results with other tumor lines
`
`2
`
`(1) For a recent review, see: Marquez, V. E. In Developments in
`Cancer Chemotherapy·, Glazer, R. I., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton,
`FL, 1984; pp 91-114.
`(2) Caminier, G. W.; Smith, C. G. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1965, 14,
`1405.
`(3) Ho, D. H. W. Cancer Res. 1973, 33, 2816.
`(4) Fanucchi, M.; Phillips, F.; Chou, T. C. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer
`* National Institutes of Health.
`Res. 1984, 25, 20.
`* University of Vermont.
`(5) Hanze, A. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6720.
`This article not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 1986 by the American Chemical Society
`
`Downloaded via FORDHAM UNIV on October 12, 2021 at 16:49:12 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0001
`
`

`

`2352 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 11
`
`Kelley et al.
`
`Table I. Anomeric Proton Signals of the Starting /3-D-Ribofuranosides (RF) and the Corresponding /3-D-Ribopyranosides (RP) Formed
`After Acid Catalysis
`
`B-R
`
`H-V
`
`Jl'2't Hz
`
`compd
`
`R
`
`RP
`
`RP
`
`RP
`
`RP
`
`H-V
`
`t/\'2'i Hz
`
`10.0
`
`10.0
`
`9.6
`
`10.5
`
`h-
`
`5.40
`
`5.00
`
`5.40
`
`5.10
`
`3
`
`5
`
`7
`
`9
`
`B
`
`compd
`
`OH
`\
`
`r
`
`r
`,— NHCx
`
` ^^  
`
`ML/
`HOi_(\h
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`8
`
`10
`
`R
`
`RF
`
`RF
`
`RF
`
`RF
`
`RF
`
`h
`
`5.80
`
`5.40
`
`5.80
`
`5.40
`
`5.40
`
`6.0
`
`6.0
`
`6.0
`
`7.0
`
`7.0
`
`possessing comparable or higher CDA levels were negative.8
`The only study that reported a therapeutic advantage for
`the above combination over ara-C alone was that of Neil
`et al., where both drugs were administered orally (po) to
`In the same study ip adminis-
`L1210 leukemic mice.9
`tration of both drugs produced no advantage over
`ip ara-C
`alone, possibly because L1210 cells lack CDA activity.
`Thus, it was hypothesized that the inhibition of intestinal
`and bacterial CDA in the lumen permitted a more regular
`and reproducible absorption of ara-C from the gastroin-
`testinal (GI) tract.9’10 A significant increase in therapeutic
`index was observed when the oral combination was given
`either as a single dose or on a daily X 5 schedule.9 These
`two schedules using the oral combination produced ILS
`values of 81% (31% with po ara-C alone) and 130% (50%
`it was
`with po ara-C alone), respectively.9 In some cases
`found that the therapeutic results with the po com-
`even
`bination were superior to those obtained with ip ora-C by
`itself.9 The unique feature of the oral combination was
`the maintenance of lower but effective therapeutic plasma
`levels of ara-C (1 pg/mL) for a longer period of time than
`with the administration of ip aro-C alone.9 Since ara-C
`is a cell-cycle phase-specific agent, the length of time to
`which tumor cells are exposed to a minimum effective drug
`level is of paramount importance. Also effective, but to
`a somewhat lesser degree, was the addition of THU to oral
`5-azacytidine therapy.11
`Despite such encouraging results with the oral combi-
`nation in mice, similar studies in monkeys and humans
`have been very discouraging.6·710 In monkeys, simulta-
`neous oral doses of THU up to 1 g/kg failed to increase
`levels of ara-C given orally at 50 mg/kg.6,10
`the serum
`
`(6) El Dareer, S. M.; Mulligan, L. T., Jr.; White, V.; Tillery, K.;
`Mellet, L. B.; Hill, D. L. Cancer Treat. Rep. 1977, 61, 395.
`(7) Wong, P. P.; Currie, V. E., Mackey, R. W.; Krakoff, I. H.; Tan,
`C. T. C.; Burchenal, J. H.; Young, C. W. Cancer Treat. Rep.
`1979, 63, 1245.
`(8) Kreis, W.; Hession, C.; Soricelli, A.; Scully, K. Cancer Treat.
`Rep. 1977, 61, 1355.
`(9) Neil, G. L.; Moxley, T. E.; Manak. R. C. Cancer Res. 1970, 30,
`2166.
`(10) Kreis, W.; Woodcock, T. M.; Gordon, C. S.; Krakoff, I. H.
`Cancer Treat. Rep. 1977, 61, 1347.
`(11) Neil, G. L.; Moxley, T. E.; Kuentzel, S. L.; Manak, R. C.;
`Hanka, L. J. Cancer Chemother. Rep. 1975, 59, 459.
`
`11
`
`RP
`
`5.10
`
`10.0
`
`Later, when more accurate measurements were made using
`orally administered [14C]THU in humans, the blood levels
`of the drug measured by an enzymatic assay indicated that
`only 23% of the radioactive species in plasma retained
`CDA inhibitory activity.12 No explanation was given to
`account for this result except for the formation of an in-
`active, but uncharacterized, THU dimeric species.10
`We report here the existence of an acid-catalyzed re-
`arrangement and inactivation of THU and several other
`nucleosides that are CDA inhibitors.
`It is possible that
`this pH-dependent rearrangement might account for the
`aforementioned disparate results and the inability of THU
`to enhance oral activity of ara-C in monkeys and humans.
`Chemistry. During the synthesis and evaluation of a
`series of saturated cyclic urea nucleosides (Table I, com-
`pounds 4, 6, 8, and 10), which functioned as very potent
`CDA inhibitors,13 unusual mass spectral and NMR results
`were observed whenever these compounds were exposed
`to acidic conditions or were kept as aqueous solutions for
`extended periods of time. Gas chromatography/mass
`spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis of these nucleosides as
`their per-trimethylsilyl (Me3Si) derivatives did not give the
`anticipated mass spectra,14 although the apparent molec-
`ular weight and degree of trimethylsilylation were as ex-
`pected. Fragment ions derived from the nucleoside sugar
`were not consistent with a ribofuranosyl sugar. The base
`peak was no longer m/z 217; m/z 204 was now a major
`peak, and the M - 103 and m/z 103 peaks, sometimes
`indicative of a 5'-silyloxy moiety,14 were of reduced in-
`In addition, two new peaks appeared at masses
`tensity.
`corresponding to M - 133 and M - 206.
`When D20 solutions of these ribofuranosyl nucleosides
`than 24 h, the
`were kept at room temperature for more
`NMR spectra also showed the progressive appearance of
`a second compound. This newly formed nucleoside ex-
`hibited a different anomeric proton as judged by a change
`in chemical shift as well as coupling constant. This slow
`
`(12) Ho, D. H. W.; Bodey, G. P., Sr.; Hall, S. W.; Benjamin, R. S.;
`Brown, N. S.; Freireich, E. J.; Loo, T. L. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
`1978 18 259
`(13) Liu, P. S.; Marquez, V. E.; Driscoll, J. S.; Fuller, R. W.;
`McCormack, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24, 662.
`(14) Pang, H.; Schram, K. H.; Smith, D. L.; Gupta, S. P.; Town-
`send, L. B.; McCloskey, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3923.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0002
`
`

`

`Furanose-Pyranose Isomerization
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 11
`
`2353
`
`M/Z
`Figure 1. Electron impact mass spectra of (a) per-silylated ribofuranoside 6 and (b) persilylated ribopyranoside 7. Mass spectra are
`the GC peak with background being computer subtracted.
`the weighted average of at least three scans
`over
`transformation in aqueous solution could be dramatically
`accelerated by trace amounts of acid either from a dilute
`HC1 solution or by a few beads of strongly acidic cation
`exchange resin. Under such conditions, NMR spectra
`indicated an equilibrium was established predominantly
`in favor of the newly formed nucleoside. This equilibrium
`mixture was maintained indefinitely and was only slightly
`changed by increased amounts of acid catalyst (vide infra).
`More importantly, when these samples were
`lyophilized
`and tested, CDA inhibitory potencies had dropped several
`orders of magnitude (i.e., K{ >   5 M) when compared to
`the parent compounds (JC¡ = 10'7 to 10*8 M).
`The above mass spectral and NMR observations are
`consistent with an acid-catalyzed ribofuranoside to ribo-
`pyranoside isomerization as depicted in Scheme I. The
`changes in chemical shift and coupling constants of several
`of the starting materials and their rearranged products are
`shown in Table I. These compounds, which include THU
`and other nucleosides with aglycons of varied ring size,
`were originally prepared as CDA inhibitors.13
`The pyranose anomeric proton exhibited an upfield shift
`of 0.3-0.4  , and its
`coupling constant increased by
`ca. 4 Hz relative to that of the furanose. Furthermore, as
`judged from these NMR spectral changes, all the com-
`pounds studied rearranged to the preferred /3-CI pyrano-
`
`side conformation where the glycosidic bond is in an
`equatorial position to allow the H-V and H-2' protons to
`be in the antiperiplanar relationship responsible for the
`large coupling constant observed.15 No other compounds
`were detected by NMR analysis.
`GC/MS analysis of the fully trimethylsilylated /3-d-
`ribofuranosides of Table I and their acid-treated products
`gave both chromatographic and mass spectral evidence of
`a change in molecular structure (Table II). The electron
`impact mass spectrum of the Me3Si derivative of the
`acid-rearranged product dramatically indicated that the
`sugar moiety of the nucleoside had been altered (e.g.,
`Figure lb). As mentioned above, the base peak was no
`longer m/z 217 as expected for a silylated ribofuranoside
`(Figure la), but now m/z 204 was several times more
`in-
`It is well-known that in a six-mem-
`tense than m/z 217.
`bered ring trimethylsilylated sugar, an intense m/z 204
`peak is indicative of multiple vicinal diols.16 Circum-
`
`(15) Townsend, L. B. Synth. Proced. Nucleic Acid Chem. 1973, 2,
`330.
`(16) DeJongh, D. C.; Radford, T.; Hribar, J. D.; Hanessian, S.;
`Bieber, M.; Dawson, G.; Sweeley, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
`1969, 91, 1728.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0003
`
`

`

`2354 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 11
`
`Kelley et al.
`
`Table II. Mass Spectral and Gas Chromatographic Data for Trimethylsilylated Ribofuranosyl (RF) and Ribopyranosyl (RP) Nucleosides
`%/“
`
`compd
`uridine
`5,6-dihydrouridine
`2
`3
`4

`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`“Percent relative intensity.
`
`MW
`no. Me3Si groups
`sugar
`RF
`532
`4
`RF
`534
`4
`RF
`608
`5
`RP
`608
`5
`RF
`506
`4
`RP
`506
`4
`RF
`520
`4
`RP
`520
`4
`RF
`534
`4
`RP
`534
`4
`RF
`622
`5
`RP

`622
`6 Isothermal retention index on an OV-17 liquid phase.
`
`m/z 204
`2.7
`1.1
`1.2
`80
`0.9
`66
`1.1
`76
`2.5
`64
`1.8
`79
`
`m/z 217
`100
`100
`100
`39
`100
`58
`100
`26
`100
`27
`100
`23
`
`RI (OV-17)6
`2610
`2539
`2504
`2581
`2364
`2427
`2413
`2459
`2410
`2471
`2521
`2615
`
`stantial evidence for a pyranose nucleoside also came from
`the reduced relative intensity of the peaks at m/z 103 and
`M - 103, which suggested some modification of the 5'-
`hydroxyl (Me3SiOCH2 after derivatization). That this new
`compound was an isomer was suggested by fragment ions
`indicating that the molecular weight, the degree of sily-
`lation, and the silylated nucleoside base (b) had not
`changed. Mass spectral peaks corresponding to M'+, M
`- CH3, M - Me3SiOH, b + H - CH3, and b + 30 were
`essentially identical to those expected for a trimethyl-
`silylated d-ribofuranosyl nucleoside.14 In addition, two
`new, very characteristic peaks of moderate intensity ap-
`peared at masses corresponding to M - 133 and M - 206.
`In order to verify that this rearrangement was unique
`ring system, uridine and
`for the fully reduced cyclic urea
`treated under the same acidic con-
`dihydrouridine were
`ditions. However, their NMR spectra remained unchanged
`indefinitely. This would suggest that the rearrangement
`through an open-chain Schiffs base, as depicted in Scheme
`I, is favored in the fully reduced compounds by the ability
`of the electrons on the N-l nitrogen to participate in the
`ring-opening process. The aromaticity of the uracil ring
`of uridine prevents this, while the partial double bond
`character between C-2 and N-3 in dihydrouridine must be
`able to provide sufficient conjugative interaction between
`the electron-withdrawing carbonyl at C-4 and N-l
`to ef-
`fectively prevent the ribofuranose to ribopyranose inter-
`conversion. This partial double bond character of amides
`has been recognized as an efficient transmitter of electronic
`and inductive effects.17
`In order to investigate this rearrangement in more detail,
`we selected a model compound on which to perform
`spectral and chromatographic studies. The compound
`chosen was
`l-(j3-D-ribofuranosyl)hexahydropyrimidin-2-one
`(6), which had been prepared previously and was known
`to act as a moderate inhibitor of CDA.5,13 The reason
`for
`selecting compound 6 rather than THU was the absence
`of the unstable carbinolamine moiety found in the latter
`compound. Thus, compound 6 permitted the study of the
`ribofuranose-ribopyranose rearrangement free of other
`possible carbinolamine-related reactions. The study was
`divided into three parts:
`first, chemical synthesis and
`characterization of the authentic rearranged product, 1-
`(/3-D-ribopyranosyl)hexahydropyrimidin-2-one (7); second,
`a detailed NMR and MS study of both starting and re-
`arranged products; and third, a preliminary kinetic in-
`vestigation of the pH and temperature dependence of this
`rearrangement.
`
`Scheme II
`
`Synthesis of Authentic Ribopyranoside.
`1-(/3-d-
`Ribopyranosyl)hexahydropyrimidin-2-one (7) was prepared
`by the Verbruggen modification of a method developed
`earlier by Holy et al.18,19 As shown in Scheme II, the
`2-trimethylsilyloxypyrimidine (13) was condensed with
`in the presence of
`tetra-O-acetyl-D-ribopyranose (12)
`SnCl4.20 The protected ribopyranoside 14 was obtained
`in 70% yield, and the correspondingly deblocked 15 proved
`to be identical in every respect to the compound previously
`reported by Holy et al.18 The remaining step was the facile
`reduction of
`the aglycon to the desired hexahydro-
`pyrimidin-2-one ribopyranoside (7). This compound was
`fully characterized by  
`and 13C NMR, IR, MS, and el-
`emental analysis. As expected, 7 proved to be identical
`to the material isolated from 6 after acid treatment. The
`identity of compound 7 with the isolated acid rearrange-
`ment product was also confirmed by HPLC analysis of a
`mixture of the two compounds.
`Spectral Studies.
`In the high-resolution (250 MHz)
`proton NMR spectrum of 7, the magnitude of the vicinal
`coupling constant of the anomeric proton indicated that
`this compound was the ß isomer.15 The anomeric coupling
`constant obtained for the starting ribofuranose 6 (Table
`I) was compatible with either a or ß configurations. An
`
`(17)
`
`Idoux, J. P.; Kiefer, G. E.; Baker, G. R.; Puckett, W. E.;
`Spence, F. J., Jr.; Simmons, K. S.; Constant, R. B.; Watlock,
`D. J.; Fuhrman, S. L. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 411.
`
`(18) Pischel, H.; Holy, A.; Wagner, G. Collect. Czech. Chem. Com-
`1972, 37, 3475.
`mun.
`(19) Holy, A. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1977, 42, 902.
`(20) Neidballa, V.; Vorbruggen, H. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3668.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0004
`
`

`

`Furanose-Pyranose Isomerization
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 11
`
`2355
`
`Table III.
`
`13C NMR Spectra of Ribofuranoside (6) and Ribopyranoside (7) Nucleosides of Hexahydropyrimidin-2-one
`4
`4
`
`carbons, ppm
`2'
`3'
`2“
`1'
`compd
`6
`5
`87.69, d
`22.03, t
`70.48, d
`69.90, d
`b
`155.27, a
`b
`6
`71.82, d
`79.53, d
`22.07, t
`67.30, d
`b
`7
`b
`156, s
`“Multiplicity indicated below the value for 13C chemical shifts. 6Obscured by solvent (Me2SO-d6).
`
`4
`
`4'
`82.71, d
`66.53, d
`
`5'
`62.00, t
`64.73, t
`
`Table IV. Major Ions from Trimethylsilyated
`l-(/3-D-Ribopyranosyl)hexahydropyrimidin-2-one (7)
`
`ions
`
`M-+
`m-ch3
`M - Me3SiOH

`- Me3SiOCHCH2OH
`S-H
`M - C2H402(Me3Si)2
`C3H302(Me3Si)2
`C2H202(Me3Si)2
`b + H - CH3
`Me3SiO+=Si(CH3)2
`(CH3)3Si
`
`mass,
`Me3Si-d„
`520
`505
`430
`387
`348
`314
`217
`204
`157
`147
`73
`
`m/z
`Me3Si-d9
`556
`538
`457
`414
`375
`332
`235
`222
`163
`162
`82
`
`no. Si
`4
`4
`3
`3
`3
`2
`2
`2
`1
`2
`1
`
`obsd
`mass,
`m/z
`520.260
`505.232
`430.209
`387.191
`348.157
`314.145
`217.099
`204.091
`157.074
`147.057
`73.050
`
`unequivocal chemical proof of the ß configuration for this
`compound, however, was performed earlier in this labo-
`ratory.13
`The 13C NMR spectral assignments listed in Table III
`for carbons 5 and 5' were based on the observed off-reso-
`nance coupling patterns. The assignments for C-T were
`based on literature data for similar compounds, which
`predicts that the anomeric carbon is the lowest field carbon
`in the sugar group.21 Carbon 2 was distinguished by its
`intensity, indicative of the low nuclear Overhauser effect
`on the carbonyl carbon. Carbons 2' and 3' were assigned
`by comparison with the data of Gorin who used specifically
`labeled deuterated sugars.22 The C-l/ carbon resonance
`was shifted upfield 8.16 ppm in ribopyranose 7, relative
`to ribofuranose 6. Likewise, the upfield shift (16.18 ppm)
`of the C-4' absorbance in 7, as compared to that in 6, is
`another consequence of the sugar ring expansion, which
`the cyclic ether oxygen away from this carbon atom.
`moves
`These upfield shifts appear to be the salient characteristics
`in the transformation of 6 to 7 as observed in the 13C NMR
`spectrum.
`Additional mass spectral studies were also undertaken
`in order to characterize further the M - 133 and M - 206
`fragment ions and to confirm assignments based on nom-
`inal mass data. Trimethylsilylation with bis(trimethyl-
`silyl)acetamide-dlg was used to determine the extent of
`silylation and the number of Me3Si groups in each frag-
`ion (Table IV). Accurate mass measurement was
`ment
`also employed to check the tentative structural assign-
`ments for the major fragment ions observed in the mass
`
`(21) Jones, A. J.; Grant, D. M.; Winkely, M. W.; Robins, R. K. J.
`Phys. Chem. 1970, 74, 2684.
`(22) Gorin, P. A. J.; Mazurek, M. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 1212.
`
`Table V.
`Isomerization Kinetics of Ribofuranose 6
`apparent ty3,a h
`apparent pH
`temp, 0 C
`fi*,6
`<0.2
`0.12
`1.0
`25
`2.23 ± 0.05
`2.0
`0.11
`25
`0.63
`2.0
`0.18
`37
`5.2 ± 0.3
`0.16
`37
`2.8°
`the initial pseudo-first-order
`0 Half-life of
`isomerization.
`6 Apparent ratio of 6 to 7 at equilibrium.
`“0.1 M acetic acid.
`
`Time (h)
`Figure 2. The furanose-pyranose isomerization of model com-
`pound 6 in pH 1 HC1 buffer at 25 °C. Mixture components were
`separated by reverse-phase HPLC and monitored at 215 nm (see
`(O) ribofuranoside 6, ( ) ribo-
`Experimental Section). Key:
`pyranoside 7, (A) ribopyranoside 16a.
`spectrum of silylated ribopyranose 7 (Figure lb, Table IV).
`The M - 133 fragment (m/z 387) represents the loss of
`C2H302SiMe3 from the molecular ion, while M - 206 (m/z
`314) is an odd-electron ion resulting from the formal loss
`of C2H402(SiMe3)2. Both of these ions apparently arise
`by fragmentation of the silylated pyranose ring and they
`are, for all intents and purposes, absent (relative abun-
`dances less than 0.2% and not the most
`intense peak in
`a cluster) in silylated furanose isomer 6. Similar frag-
`mentation patterns are observed in the mass spectra of the
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0005
`
`

`

`2356 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1986, Vol. 29, No. 11
`
`Table VI. CDA Inhibitory Activity of Ribofuranoside and
`Ribopyranoside Forms of Various Cyclic Urea Nucleoside
`Inhibitors
`
`K¡, M, mouse kidney CDA
`1.5 x 10"7
`2 X 10"5
`4 X 10-*
`>5 X 10-5
`3 X 10"7
`6.6 x 10"*
`ribofuranose and ribopyranose
`
`compd pairs
`2 (ribofuranose)
`3“ (ribopyranose)
`6 (ribofuranose)
`7 (ribopyranose)
`8 (ribofuranose)
`9“ (ribopyranose)
`“Results from a mixture of
`formed after acid treatment.
`trimethylsilyl derivatives of pyranoses 3, 5, 9, and 11.
`Kinetics. The rate of isomerization of ribofuranose 6
`to ribopyranose 7 as a function of pH was determined by
`HPLC analysis of solutions of 6 buffered in the pH 1-3
`range and maintained at either 25 or 37 °C. As expected,
`lowering the pH or raising the temperature accelerated the
`rate of isomerization (Table V). At pH 1 and 25 °C the
`so rapid that
`rate of isomerization was
`the apparent
`half-life for 6 could not be accurately determined (Figure
`2). However, at pH 2 and 25 °C the disapperance of 6
`with respect to time initially followed pseudo-first- order
`In all
`kinetics with an apparent half-life of 2.23 ± 0.05 h.
`cases a constant ratio of 6 to 7 was eventually reached with
`the ribopyranose form predominating by factors of 6-9.
`That this isomerization results in an equilibrium was
`further demonstrated by facile conversion of synthetic 7
`to 6 at pH 1 and 25 °C to give an identical ratio of 6 to
`7 as that observed in Figure 2.
`The slow increase of an additional, longer retained peak
`with a k' = 5.16 was observed during HPLC analysis of 6
`and 7 in acid buffer (dashed line, Figure 2). The formation
`of this material may account for the gradual and parallel
`decrease in both 6 and 7; however, nothing can be said
`about the relative amount of this compound since its ex-
`tinction coefficient at 215 nm is not known. Semiprepa-
`rative HPLC was used to isolate this material for further
`characterization by NMR and mass spectrometry. Proton
`NMR indicated a nucleoside with the anomeric proton
`being a doublet centered at 5.55   and with Jv¡2> equal to
`10 Hz. The positive ion FAB mass spectrum showed an
`apparent protonated molecular ion at m/z 263, indicating
`an increase of 30 daltons over either 6 or 7. GC/MS
`analysis of this material after trimethylsilylation was es-
`pecially revealing. A ribopyranose sugar was clearly in-
`dicated by the m/z 204 base peak and other diagnostic ions
`(e.g., M - 133, M - 206, S - H at m/z 348) in the electron
`impact spectrum. The site of modification was identified
`as the nucleoside base, which now possessed a moiety that
`could be readily trimethylsilylated and was 30 daltons
`than the base in 6 or 7. Based on this evidence, this
`more
`derivative was
`tenatively assigned structure 16b. Thus,
`compound 16a probably arises from reductive N-
`formylation of 7 because of the 200 ppm formaldehyde that
`is added to the commerical buffer as a preservative.
`
`^^*<^   -  2  
`
`RO
`
`16a, R = H
`b, R = Si(CH3)3
`Biology. As observed in Table VI, CDA inhibitory
`activity was dramatically reduced for the ribopyranoside
`nucleosides. This was particulary noteworthy in the case
`In the
`of compound 7, which was studied in its pure form.
`
`Kelley et al.
`other cases
`(i.e., compounds 3 and 9) the assay mixtures
`obtained after acid treatment contained greater than 90%
`of the ribopyranoside form as evidenced from NMR.
`These samples were obtained from the aqueous solutions
`of the pure ribofuranosides after treatment with excess
`acidic resin for 15 min and subsequent lyophilization.
`It
`is possible that the residual ribofuranoside contributed a
`significant portion of the activity seen in these equilibrium
`mixtures.
`Discussion
`Ribofuranoside to ribopyranoside rearrangements have
`been described previously. The very simple l-(/3-D-ribo-
`furanosyl)urea has been reported to convert slowly to the
`ribopyranoside form in aqueous solution at room tem-
`perature.23,24 Likewise, a furanoid glycosyl derivative of
`5,5-dibromo-5,6-dihydro-6-hydroxyuracil underwent
`anomerization as well as ring expansion of the sugar moiety
`to give the corresponding pyranoside form.25 Some ami-
`nopyrimidine nucleosides, derived from the opening of the
`imidazole ring in certain purines, also underwent rear-
`rangement to the more stable ribopyranoside form after
`acid treatment.26 Finally, the deblocking of N-(2',3',5'-
`tri-O-acetylribofuranosyl) anthranilonitrile with methanolic
`ammonia resulted in the formation of the more
`thermo-
`dynamically favored ß-pyranoside isomer.27
`The THU literature does not address the problem of
`ribofuranose to ribopyranose rearrangement in the cases
`Information re-
`where this drug has been given orally.
`garding the acid stability of THU, however, was reported
`by chemists at Stanford Research Institute who analyzed
`different lots of THU for the NCI. They considered the
`material to be highly unstable under acidic conditions as
`judged by NMR and optical rotation measurements.28 At
`that time, however, it was not realized that there was a
`concomitant loss of biological potency associated with the
`acid instability of the drug. This finding is of particular
`importance when one observes that patients who received
`oral THU had fasted for 12-18 h and that the solution of
`the drug was often given with an equal volume of orange
`juice. Human gastric fluid has a pH of 1.2-1.7s9 and orange
`juice can be as low as pH 3.30 This combination of cir-
`cumstances makes it very likely that THU was being
`rapidly inactivated and therefore rendered ineffective in
`protecting ara-C from deamination. This would also ex-
`plain the discrepancy between the radioactive and enzy-
`matic assays in determining THU plasma levels.12 Since
`the study of Neil et al.9 showed a definite advantage with
`orally administered THU in mice, while the work of Kreis10
`in humans and El Dareer6 in monkeys did not, it is possible
`in light of the present discussion that this is simply the
`result of pH differences between the stomachs of the ex-
`In agreement with this suggestion,
`perimental subjects.
`the reported values for the pH of the stomach contents in
`
`(23) Ukita, T.; Hamada, A.; Yoshida, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1964,
`12, 454.
`(24) Naito, T.; Kawakami, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1962, 10, 627.
`(25) Cadet, J. In Nucleic Acid Chemistry; Townsend, L. B., Tipson,
`R. S., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1978; Part I, pp 311-315.
`(26) Montgomery, J. A.; Thomas, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36,
`1962.
`(27) Ferris, J. P.; Singh, S.; Newton, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44,
`173.
`(28) Giampietro, S.; Cheung, A.; Lim, P. Stanford Research Insti-
`tute Report, Contract NOl-CM-33723, Dec. 3, 1975.
`(29) Documenta Geigy, 6th ed.; Diem, K., Ed.; Geigy Pharmaceu-
`ticals: Ardsley, NY, 1962; pp 520-523.
`(30) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 62nd ed.; Weast, R. C.,
`Astle, M. J., Eds.; CRC:Boca Raton, FL, 1981; p D-127.
`
`Apotex v. Cellgene - IPR2023-00512
`Petitioner Apotex Exhibit 1015-0006
`
`

`

`Furanose-Pyranose Isomerization
`mice fluctuates between 2.2 and 4.8.31 Since the acid
`stability and the kinetics of isomerization of THU are
`similar to 6,32 THU in its active ribofuranose form would
`have been inactivated to a great extent during oral ad-
`ministration to humans.
`It can be concluded, therefore, that stomach acidity
`might be a determining factor in controlling the concen-
`tration of THU that is available to block deamination of
`ara-C in the GI tract. As discussed earlier, inhibition of
`the deamination reaction is an important prerequisite for
`a gradual absorption of ara-C. This situation has probably
`never been achieved in the animal experiments or during
`the THU clinical trials where ara-C and THU were used
`concomitantly in species with an acidic stomach content.
`Experimental Section
`General Methods.   NMR spectra for routine samples were
`recorded on Varían T-60 instrument. For high resolution, a
`Brucher WM 250 model was used. High-resolution 1H NMR and
`IR
`13C NMR studies were performed using Me2SO-d6 as solvent.
`spectra were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer 727B infrared spec-
`trophotometer with the samples as Nujol mulls. Melting points
`were determined on a Thomas-Hoover apparatus and are un-
`corrected. Elemental analyses were performed by Galbraith
`Inc., Knoxville, TN. Cytidine deaminase was
`Laboratories,
`kidney preparation with the same
`measured by using a mouse
`methodology as reported previously by us.13
`Microscale trimethylsilylation of nucleosides (1-2 mg) and the
`corresponding isomerized mixtures was conducted at room tem-
`perature with 0.45 mL of a 1:2 (v/v) solution of bis(trimethyl-
`silyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and redistilled acetonitrile. The
`trimethylsilyl-dg derivatives of compounds 6 and 7 were also
`prepared. About 1 mg of each isomer was individually reacted
`with 0.15 mL of a 1:2 (v/v) mixture of bis(trimethylsilyl-d9)-
`acetamide and redistille

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket