throbber

`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`APOTEX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`CELGENE CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2023-00512
`Patent 8,846,628
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ANDREW J. DANFORD IN SUPPORT OF
`UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CELGENE 2152
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`IPR2023-00512
`
`

`

`I, Andrew J. Danford, declare as follows:
`1.
`I obtained a S.B. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
`
`IPR2023-00512
`Patent No. 8,846,628
`
`
`2005 and a J.D. from the Stanford Law School in 2008.
`
`2.
`
`I am currently a partner in the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering
`
`Hale and Dorr LLP. I was admitted to the Massachusetts Bar in January of 2009
`
`and the New York Bar in August of 2010 and have been practicing law for over 13
`
`years. During the entire time that I have been practicing law, my practice has
`
`focused on the field of intellectual property, and particularly, patent litigation.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Massachusetts and New York
`
`Bars and am admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the
`
`District of Massachusetts, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit,
`
`and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`4. My New York Bar membership numbers is 4855318. My
`
`Massachusetts Bar membership number is 672342.
`
`5.
`
`Over the course of my career, I have been counsel in numerous patent
`
`litigations. Several of these cases have concerned Patent Office rules and
`
`regulations. For example, I represented Cephalon, Inc. in Apotex Inc. v. Cephalon,
`
`Inc., No. 12-1417 (Fed. Cir.).
`
`6.
`
`I have appeared pro hac vice before the Office in the following
`
`proceedings: Hospira Inc. et al. v. Genentech Inc., IPR2017-00737 (pro hac vice
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`granted); Hospira Inc. et al. v. Genentech Inc., IPR2017-00739 (pro hac vice
`
`IPR2023-00512
`Patent No. 8,846,628
`
`
`granted); Hospira Inc. et al. v. Genentech Inc., IPR2017-00805 (pro hac vice
`
`granted); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Genentech Inc., IPR2017-
`
`02031 (pro hac vice granted); Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. v.
`
`Genentech Inc., IPR2017-02032 (pro hac vice granted); Pfizer Inc. et al. v.
`
`Genentech Inc., IPR2017-01488 (pro hac vice granted); Pfizer Inc. et al. v.
`
`Genentech Inc., IPR2017-01489 (pro hac vice granted); Celltrion Inc. v.
`
`Genentech Inc., IPR2017-01373 (pro hac vice granted); Celltrion Inc. v.
`
`Genentech Inc., IPR2017-01374 (pro hac vice granted); PNC Bank N.A. v. United
`
`Services Automobile Association, IPR2021-01077 (pro hac vice granted).
`
`7.
`
`I have an established familiarity with the subject matter of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 8,846,628 (the ’628 patent), the ’628 patent’s file history, and the prior art at
`
`issue in this proceeding. I am familiar with pharmaceutical technologies as a
`
`result of participation as counsel in related district court litigations on the ’628
`
`patent as well as many prior pharmaceutical-related intellectual property cases. I
`
`have also recently represented other pharmaceutical companies, including, among
`
`others, Genentech, AbbVie, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and Cephalon
`
`in patent litigation matters before federal district courts and the Federal Circuit.
`
`The technology involved in these disputes includes drug formulation technology.
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`IPR2023-00512
`Patent No. 8,846,628
`
`
`8.
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`9.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application
`
`for admission to practice.
`
`10.
`
`I have never had any sanctions or contempt citations imposed on me
`
`by any court or administrative body.
`
`11.
`
`I attest to each of the listed items required by the Order – Notice of
`
`Filing Date Accorded to Petition And Time For Filing Patent Owner Preliminary
`
`Response in IPR2023-00512.
`
`12.
`
`I have read and will comply with Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in 37 C.F.R. Part 42.
`
`13.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under
`
`Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00512
`Patent No. 8,846,628
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Andrew J. Danford/
`Andrew J. Danford
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
` HALE AND DORR LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Andrew.Danford@wilmerhale.com
`Tel.: 617-526-6806
`Fax: 617-526-5000
`
`
`Dated: October 18, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket