throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`20-541/S-006
`
`FINAL PRINTED LABELING ©
`
`(cid:38)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:20)(cid:22)(cid:23)
`CELGENE 2134
`(cid:36)(cid:51)(cid:50)(cid:55)(cid:40)(cid:59)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:40)(cid:47)(cid:42)(cid:40)(cid:49)(cid:40)
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:21)(cid:22)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:20)(cid:21)
`IPR2023-00512
`
`

`

`PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION "2OCHURE
`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`APPROVED
`SEP
`1 2000
`
`Rev H-6 05/00
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`SIC No. XXXXX-XX
`
`ARIMIDEX® (anastrozole) tablets for oral administration contain | mg of anastrozole, a non-steroidal
`aromataseinhibitor.
`It is chemically described as 1,3-Benzenediacetonitrile, a, a, a", a!-tetramethyl-5-(1H-1,2,4-
`triazol-|-ylmethyl).
`Its molecular formulais C17H)9Ns andits structural formula is:
`
`
`
`Anastrozole is an off-white powder with a molecular weight of293.4. Anastrozole has moderate aqueous
`solubility (0.5 mg/mLat 25°C); solubility is independentofpH in the physiological range. Anastrozole is freely
`soluble in methanol, acetone, ethanol, and tetrahydrofuran, and very soluble in acetonitrile.
`
`lactose, magnesium stearate, hydroxypropylmethyicellulose,
`Eachtablet contains as inactive ingredients:
`polyethylene glycol, povidone, sodium starch glycolate, and titanium dioxide.
`
`CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
`
`Mechanism of Action
`
`In
`Manybreast cancers have estrogen receptors and growth ofthese tumors can be stimulated by estrogen.
`post-menopausal women,
`the principal source of circulating estrogen (primarily estradiol)
`is conversion of
`adrenally-generated androstenedione to estrone by aromatase in peripherel tissues, such as adipose tissue, with
`further conversion of estroneto estradiol.Many breast cancers also contain aromatase; the importance oftumor-
`
`generated estrogensis uncertain.
`
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofAstraZeneca Group.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`Page 2
`
`Treatmentofbreast cancerhas inc!nded efforts to decrease estrogen levels, by ovariectomy premenopausal]y
`and Ly use of anti-estrogens and Progestational agents both pre- and post-menopausally; and these interventions
`lead tdecreased tumor mass or delayed progression oftumorgrowth in some women.
`
`It significantly lowers serum
`Anastrozole is a potent and Selective non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor.
`estradiol concentrations and has no detectable effect on formation ofadrenal Corticosteriods oraldosterone.
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`Inhibition ofaromataseActivity is primarily due to anastrozole, the parent drug. Studies with radiolabeled
`drug have demonstrated that orally administered anastrozole is well absorbed into the Systemiccirculation with 83
`to 85% ofthe radiolabel recovered in urine and feces. Food does not affectthe extent ofabsorption. Elimination of
`anastrozole is primarily via hepatic metabolism (approximately 85%) and to a lesser extent, renal excretion
`(approximately 11%), and anastrozole has a mean terminal elimination half-life of approximately 50 hours in
`postmenopausal women. The major circulating metabolite ofanastrozole, triazole, lacks pharmacologic activity,
`The pharmacokinetic parameters are similar, in patients and in healthy postmenopausal volunteers.
`The
`pharmacokinetics of anastrozole are linear over the dose range of | to 20 mg and do not change with repeated
`dosing. Consistent with the approximately 2-day terminal elimination half-life, plasma concentrations approach
`Steady-state levels at about 7 days of once daily dosing and steady-state levels are approximatelythree- to four-fold
`higher than levels observed aftera single dose ofARIMIDEX. Anastrozole is 40% bound to plasma proteins in the
`therapeutic range.
`
`Metabolism and Excretion: Studies in Postmenopausal women demonstrated that anastrozole is extensively
`metabolized with about 10% ofthe dose excreted in the urine as unchanged drug within 72 hours ofdosing, and the
`remainder (about 60% of‘the dose) is excreted in urine as metabolites. Metabolism ofanastrozole occurs by N-
`dealkylation, hydroxylation and glucuronidation. Three metabolites ofanastrozole have been identified in -human
`plasma and urine. The known metabolites are triazole, a glucuronide conjugate of hydroxy-anastrozole, and a
`glucuronide ofanastrozole itself. Several minor (less than 5% ofthe radioactive dose) metabolites have not been:
`
`identified.
`
`Because renal elimination is not a significant pathwayofelimination, total body clearance ofanastrozole is
`unchanged even in severe (creatinine cléarance less than 30 mL/min/1.73m’) renal impairment, dosing adjustment
`in
`patients with renal dysfuncticn is not necessary (see Special Populations
`and DOSAGE AND -
`ADMINISTRATION sections). Dosage adjustmentis also unnecessary in patients with stable hepatic cirrhosis (see
`Special Populations and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION sections).
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`Page 3
`
`-‘pecial Populations:
`Geriatric: Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in postmenopausal female volunteers and
`patients with breast cancer. No age related effects were seen over the range <50 to >80 years.
`
`Race:_Estradiol and estrone sulfate levels were similar between Japanese and Caucasian post-menopausal
`women who received 1 mg of anastrozole daily for 16 days. Anastrozole mean Steady state minimum plasma
`concentrationsin Caucasian and Japanese post-menopausal women were 25.7 and 30.4 ng/mLrespectively.
`
`investigated in subjects with renal
`Renal Iasufficiency: Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been
`insufficiency.
`Anastrozole renal clearance decreased Proportionally with creatinine clearance and was
`approximately 50% lower in volunteers with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min/1.73m?)
`compared to controls. Since only about 10% of anastrozole is excreted unchanged in the urine, the reduction in
`renal clearance did notinfluence the
`total body clearance. (see DOSAGEAND ADMINISTRATION).
`
`Hepatic Insufficiency: Hepatic metabolism accounts for approximately 85% of anastrozole elimination.
`Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in subjects with hepatic cirrhosis related to alcohol abuse.
`The apparent oral clearance (CL/F) ofanastrozole was approximately 30% lower in subjects with stable hepatic
`curthosis than in control subjects with normal liver function. However, plasma anastrozole concentrations in the
`Subjects with hepatic cirrhosis were within the range of concentrations seen in normal subjects across all clinica]
`trials (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION),so that no dosage adjustment is needed.
`
`Drug-Drug Interactions: Anastrozoleinhibited reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 1A2, 2C8/9, and
`3A4 in vitro with Ki values which were approximately 30 times higher than the mean Steady-state C,,. values
`observed following a 1 mg daily dose. Anastrozole had no inhibitory effect on reactionscatalyzed by cytochrome
`P450 2A6 or 2D6 in vitro, Administration of a single 30 mg/kg or multiple 10 mg/kg doses of anastrozole to
`subjects had no effect on theclearanceofantipyrineorurinary recoveryofantipyrinemetabolites. Basedon these in .
`vitro and in vivo resuits,it is unlikely that co-administration of ARIMIDEX I mg with other drugs will result in
`clinically significant inhibition ofcytochrome P450 mediated metabolism.
`
`In a study conducted in 16 male volunteers, anastrozoledid notalter the pharmacokinetics as measured by C,,, and
`AUC,and anticoagulant activity as measured by prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and
`thrombin time of both R- and S-warfarin.
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`.
`
`Page 4
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`
`Effect on Estradiol: Mean serum concentrations of estradiol were evalua‘ed in multiple daily dosing trials
`with 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 mg of ARIMIDEXin postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Clinically
`Significant suppression ofserum estradiol was seen with all doses. Doses of1 mgand higherresulted in suppression
`of mean serum concentrations of estradiol to the lower limit of detection (3.7 pmol/L). The recommended daily
`dose, ARIMIDEX I mg,reduced estradiol by approximately 70% within 24 hours and by approximately 80% after
`14 days of daily dosing. Suppression of serum estradiol! was maintained for up to 6 days after cessation of daily
`dosing with ARIMIDEX 1 mg.
`
`Effect on Corticosteroids: In multiple daily dosing trials with 3, 5, and 10 mg,the selectivity ofanastrozole
`was assessed by examining effects on corticosteriod synthesis. Forall doses, anastrozole did not affect cortisol or
`aldosterone secretion at baseline.or in response to ACTH. No glucocorticoid or mineralccorticoid replacement
`therapy is necessary with anastrozole.
`
`Other Endocrine Effects: In multiple daily dosing trials with 5 and 10 mg, thyroid stimulating hormone
`(TSH) was measured; there was No increase in TSH during the administration of ARIMIDEX. ARIMIDEX does
`not possess direct progestogenic, androgenic, or estrogenic activity in animals, but does perturb the circulating
`levels of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens.
`
`Clinical Studies - First Line Therapyin Postmenopausal Womenwith Advanced Breast Cancer: Two
`double-blind well-controlled clinical studies of similar design (0030, a North American study and 0027, a
`predominately European study) were conducted to assess the efficacy of ARIMIDEX compared with tamoxifen as
`first-line therapy for hormone receptor
`positive or hormonereceptor unknownlocally advanced or metastatic breast
`¢ancer_in postmenopausal women. A total of 1021 patients between the ages of 30 and 92 years old _were
`randomized to receive trial treatment. Patients were randomizedto receive I_me of ARIMIDEX once daily or 20
`me oftamoxifen once daily. The primary end points for both trials were time to tumor progression, objective tumor
`response rate, andsafety.
`
`Demographics and otherbaseline characteristics, including patients who had measurable and no measurable
`patients who were
`piven
`revious adjuvant therapy,
`the site of metastatic disease and ethnic origin were
`disease,
`
`
`
`simiar for the two treatment groups for both trials. The following table summarizes the hormone receptorstatus at
`entryfor all randomized patients in trials 0030 and 0027,
`
`_
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property of Zeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`(
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`(
`
`.
`
`Page 5
`
`Receptorstatus
`
`Table t
`Number(%) ofsubjects
`Trial 0030
`Trial 0027
`ARIMIDEX
`Tamoxifen
`ARIMIDEX Tamoxifen
`! mg
`20 mg
`Img
`20 mg
`(n=171)
`(n=182)
`(n=340)
`(n=328)
`151 (88.3)
`162 (89.0)
`154 (45.3)
`144 (43.9)
`19 (11.1)
`20 (11.0)
`185 (54.4)
`183 (55.8)
`
`ER+ and/or PR+
`ER unknown, PR unknown
`ER = Estrogen receptor
`PR = Progesterone Teceptor
`trial 0030 showed ARIMIDEX wasat least as effective as tamoxifen for objective
`For the primary
`endpoints.
`fumor response rate. ARIMIDEX had a Statistically
`significant advantage over tamoxifen
`(p=0.006)
`for time to
`tumor progression (see Table 2 and Fi ure 1). Trial 0027 showed ARIMIDEX was at least as effective as tamoxifen
`for objective tumor response rate and time to tumor progression (See Table 2 and Figure 2).
`
`Table 2 below summarizes the results oftrial 0030 andtrial 0027 forthe primary efficacy endpoints.
`
`End point
`
`Timeto progression (TTP)
`Median TTP (months)
`Number(%)ofsubjects
`whoprogressed
`Hazard ratio (LCL)!
`2-sided 95% Cl
`p-value?
`Best objective responserate
`Number(%) of subjects
`with CR + PR
`Odds Ratio (LCL)?
`
`CR = Complete Response
`PR = Partial Response
`Cl = ConfidenceInterval
`LCL = Lower Confidence Limit
`! Tamoxifen:ARIMIDEX
`2Two-Sided Log Rank
`3ARIMIDEX: Tamoxifen
`
`Table 2
`Trial 0027
`Trial 0030
`ARIMIDEX Tamoxifen
`| mg
`20 mg
`(n=171)
`(n=182)
`U1
`5.6
`114 (67%)
`138 (76%)
`1.42 (1.15)
`(1.11, 1.82)
`0.006
`
`ARIMIDEX Tamoxifen
`Img
`20 mg
`(n=340)
`(n=328)
`8.2
`8.3
`249 (73%) 247 (75%)
`1.01 (0.87)
`(0.85, 1.20)
`0.920
`
`36 (21.1%)
`1.30 (0.83)
`
`31 (17.0%)
`
`112 (32.9%)
`1.01 (0.77)
`
`107 (32.6%)
`
`.
`
`vee
`
`ceeeeeteee
`
`en bee be eee ee ee
`
`
`
`Figure ! - Kaplan-Meier cobabili
`treat) in Trial 0030
`
`
`
`of time to disease
`
`
`progression for all randomized patients (intent-to-
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`Page 6
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`
`PROPORTIONNOTPROGRESSING
`
`
`
`i ili -to-treat)Figure 2 Ka in Trial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FROPORTIONNOTPROGRESSING o uw
`
`6
`
`6
`
`10
`
`
`12 4 «606
`hte
`ee
`22
`24
`26
`26
`30
`32
`34
`3¢
`36
`«640
`42
`TIME TO PROGRESSION CHONTHS )
`
`RANDOMISED TREATMENT
`ANASTROZOLE
`— —- TANOKIFEN
`40
`38
`36
`34
`32
`06
`14
`2
`4
`6
`@
`to
`t2
`10
`20
`22
`24
`26
`26
`30
`6
`;
`MONTHS
`a
`2
`3
`s
`s
`668 S@2 440 359 322 249 108 1S@ (IT 6 6S Ss 4s
`35
`24
`Ie
`AT RISK :
`Results from the secondary endpoints oftime to treatment failure, duration of tumor response, and duration
`of clinical benefit were supportive of the results of the
`prim
`Ppo'
`pnmary efficacy endpoints. “There were too few deaths
`occurring across treatment groups ofboth trials to draw conclusions on overall survival differences.
`,
`
`.
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the Property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`Page 7
`
`Clinical Studies - Second Line Therapy in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer whooeeeeipyinLostmenopausalWomenwithAdvancedBreastCancerwho
`
`
`
`
`had Disease Progression following Tamoxifen Therapy:
`Anastrozole was studied in two well-controlled clinical trials (0004, a North American Study; 0005, a
`predominately European study) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease
`Progression following tamoxifen therapy for either advanced or early breast cancer. Someofthe patients had also
`received previous cytotoxic treatment. Most patients were ER-positive; a smaller fraction were ER-unknown or ER-
`negative; the ER-negative Patients were eligible only ifthey had had a positive response to tamoxifen. Eligible
`patients with measurable and non-measurable disease were randomized to receive either a single daily dose of| mg
`or 10mg of ARIMIDEX or megestrol acetate 40 mg four times a day. The studies were double-blinded with
`_ Fespect to ARIMIDEX. Time to progression and objective response (only patients with measurable disease could be
`considered partial responders) rates were the primary efficacy variables. Objective response rates were calculated
`based on the Union Intemationale Contre le Cancer (UICC)criteria. Therate ofprolonged (more than 24 weeks)
`Stable disease, the rate ofprogression, and surviyal were also calculated.
`
`Both trials included over 375 patients; demographics and other baseline characteristics were similar for the
`three treatment groupsin eachtrial. Patients in the 0005 trial had responded better to prior tamoxifen treatment. Of
`the patients entered who had prior tamoxifen therapy for advanced disease (58% in Trial 0004; $7% in Trial 0005),
`18% ofthese patients in Trial 0004 and 42% in Trial 0005 were reported by the primary investigator to have
`responded.
`In Trial 0004, 81% of patients were ER-positive, 13% were ER-unknown, and 6% were ER-negative.
`In Trial 0005, 58% ofpatients were ER-positive, 37% were ER-unknown, and 5% were ER-negative. In Trial 0604,
`62% ofpatients had measurable disease compared to 79% in Trial 0005. Thesites ofmetastatic disease were similar
`among treatment groupsfor each trial. On average, 40% of the patients had soft tissue metastases; 60% had bone
`metastases; and 40% hadvisceral (15% liver) metastases.
`
`As shownin the table below, similar results were observed amongtreatment groups and between the two
`trials. Noneofthe within trialdifferences were statistically significant.
`
`Add:Table3
`
`ARIMIDEX ARIMIDEX
`Meeestro}
`.
`Acetate
`
`160 mg
`(n=128)
`32.9
`26.7
`
`Trial 0004
`
`CN. America)
`Median Follow-up (months)*
`Median Timeto Death (mionths)
`
`I meg
`(n=128)
`31.3
`29.6
`
`10 me
`(n=130)
`30.9
`25.7
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`
`
`(
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`(
`
`:
`
`Page 8
`
`2 Year Survival Probability (%)
`Median Timeto Progression (months)
`Objective Response
`(all patients) (%)
`Stable Disease for >24 weeks (%)
`Progression (%)
`
`Trial 0005
`
`(n=135)
`
`(Europe, Australia, S. Africa)
`Median Follow-up (months)*
`Median Timeto Death (months)
`2 Year Survival Probability (%)
`Median Timeto Progression (months)
`Objective Response
`(all patients) (%)
`Stable Disease for >24 weeks (%)
`Progression (%)
`*Surviving Patients
`
`62.0
`5.7
`12.5
`35.2
`86.7
`
`(n=118)
`31.0
`24.3
`50.5
`44
`12.6
`24.4
`91.9
`
`58.0
`$.3
`10.0
`29.2
`85.4
`
`(n=125)
`30.9
`24.8
`50.9
`5.3
`15.3
`25.4
`89.8
`
`53.1
`5.1
`10.2
`32.8
`90.6
`
`31.5
`19.8
`39.1
`3.9
`144
`23.2
`“92.0
`
`More than 1/3 ofthe patients in each treatment group in both studies hadeither an objective response or
`Stabilization of their disease for greater than 24 weeks. Amongthe 263 patients who received ARIMIDEX | mg,
`there were 1! complete responders and 22 partial responders. In patients who had an objective response, more than
`80% werestill responding at 6 months from randomization and more than 45% were still responding at 12 months
`
`from randomization.
`
`When data from the two controlled trials are pooled, the objective response rates and median times to
`Progression and death were similar for patients randomized to ARIMIDEX 1 mg and megestrol acetate. Thereis, in
`this data, no indication that ARIMIDEX 10 mgis superior to ARIMIDEX I mg.
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`
`
`(
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`(
`
`Page 9
`
`Add:
`
`Table4Trials 0004 & 0005 ARIMIDEX Img ARIMIDEX 10 mg Megestrol Acetate
`
`
`(Pooled Data)
`N=263
`N=248
`160 mg
`Median Timeto
`26.7
`25.5
`22.5
`Death (months)
`2 Year Survival
`56.1
`54.6
`46.3
`Probability (%)
`Median Timeto
`4.8
`5.3
`4.6
`Progression
`(months)
`Objective Response
`(all patients) (%)
`
`N=253
`
`12.3
`
`12.5
`
`,
`
`12.5
`
`Objective response rates and median times to progression and death for ARIMIDEX | mg were similar to
`megestrol acetate for women overor under 65. There were too few non-white patients studied to draw conclusions
`about racial differences in response.
`
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE
`ARIMIDEX is indicated for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor
`Positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
`
`ARIMIDEXis indicated for the treatment ofadvanced breast cancer in postmenopausal womenwith disease
`Progression following tamoxifen therapy.
`
`Patients with ER-negative disease and patients who did not respond to previous tamoxifen therapy rarely
`
`responded to ARIMIDEX.
`
`CONTRAINDICATIONS
`
`None known.
`
`WARNINGS
`
`ARIMIDEX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Anastrozole has been found to
`cross the placenta following oral administration-of-0.4-mg/kg inrats and rabbits(about 3/4 and 1.5times the
`recommended human dose, respectively, on a mg/m’ basis). Studies in both rats and rabbits at doses equal to or
`greater than 0.1 and 0.02 mg/kg/day, respectively (about 3/4 and 1/3, respectively, the recommended human dose
`on a me/n.* basis), administered during the period of organogenesis showed that anastrozole increased pregnancy ©
`loss (increased pre- and/or post-implantation loss, increased resorption, and decreased numbers oflive fetuses);
`
`ARIMIDEX H~ 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property of Zeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`Page 10
`
`effects were dose related in rats. Placental Weights weresignificantly increased in rats at doses of ~.2 mg/kg/day or
`
`more.
`
`Evidence offetotoxicity, including delayed fetal development(i.¢., incomplete ossification and depressed
`fetal body weights), was observed in rats administered doses of 1 mg/kg/day (which produced plasma anastrozole
`Comex and AUC, nw that were 19 times and 9 times higher than the respective values found in healthy post-
`menopausal humansatthe recommended dose). There was no evidence ofteratogenicity in rats administered doses
`up to 1.0 mg/kg/day.
`In rabbits, anastrozole caused pregnancy failureat doses equal to or greater than 1.0
`mg/kg/day (about 16 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m? basis);
`there was no evidence of
`teratogenicity in rabbits administered 0.2 mg/kg/day (about 3 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m?
`
`basis).
`
`There are no adequate andwell-controlled Studies in pregnant women using ARIMIDEX. IfARIMIDEXis
`used during pregnancy,orifthe patient becomespregnantwhile receiving this drug, the patient should be apprised
`ofthe potential! hazard to the fetus or potential risk for loss ofthe pregnancy.
`
`PRECAUTIONS
`
`General: Before starting treatment with ARIMIDEX, pregnancy must be excluded (see WARNINGS).
`
`ARIMIDEXshould be administered under the supervision ofa qualified physician experienced in the use of
`anticanceragents.
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`Page 11
`
`Three-foid elevations of mean serun. $mma glutamyltransferase (GT) levels have
`Laboratory Tests:
`been ¢ bserved among patients with liver metastases receiving ARIMIDEX or megestrolacetate. These changes
`werelikely related to the progression ofliver metastases in these patients, although other contributing factors could
`
`not be ruled out.
`
`(See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY) Anastrozole inhibited in vitro metabolic
`Drug Interactions:
`reactions catalyzed by cytochromes P450 1A2, 2C8/9, and 3A4 but only at relatively high concentrations.
`Anastrozole did not inhibit P450 2A6or the polymorphic P4S0 2D6 in human liver microsomes. Anastrozole did
`not alter the pharmacokinetics ofantipyrine. Although there have been no formal interaction studies other than with
`antipyrine, based on these in vivo and in vitro studies, it is unlikely that co-administration of a I mg dose of
`ARIMIDEX with other drugs will result in clinically significant drug inhibition of cytochrome P450-mediated
`metabolism ofthe other drugs.
`:
`-
`
`An_interaction study with warfarin showed no clinically significant effect of anastrozole on_warfarin
`pharmacokinetics or anticoagulant activity.
`
`Drug/Laboratory Test Interactions: No clinically significant changes in the results ofclinical laboratory
`
`tests have been observed.
`
` Carcinogenesis: Neteng-term-animal-studies-have-beer cendusted-te-assess_the-_carcinesenic-—potenti
`ARIMIDEX. A conventional carcinogenesis study in rats at doses of1.0 to 25 mg/kg/day (about8 to 200 times the
`daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m? basis) administered by oral gavage for up to 2 years
`revealed an increase in the incidence of hepatocellular adenoma and carcinoma and uterine stromal polyps in
`females and thyroid adenomain males at the high dose. A dose related increase was observedin the incidence of
`ovarian anduterine hyperplasia in females. At 25 mg/kg/day, plasma AUC,4, levels in rats were 110 to 125 times
`higher than the level exhibited in post-menopausal volunteers at the recommended dose. A Separate carcinogenicity
`Study in mice atoral doses of 5 to 50 mg/kg/day (about 20 to 200 times thé daily maximum recommended human
`dose on a mg/m’basis) for up to 2 years produced an increase in the incidence ofbenign ovarian stromal, epithelial
`and granulosa cell tumors at all dose levels. A doserelated increase in the incidence ofovarian hyperplasia was also
`observed in female mice. These ovarian changes are consideredtobe rodent-specific effectsofaromatase inhibition~~
`and are of questionable significance to humans. The incidence of lymphosarcoma. was- increased-in- mates -and-
`females at the high dose. At 50 me/kg/day, plasma AUClevels in mice were 35 to 40 times higher than the level
`exhibited in post-menopausal volunteers at the recommended dose. :
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`Page 12
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`rr
`
`(
`
`\
`
`Mutagenesis: ARIMIDEX has not been shown to be mutagenic in in vitro tests (Ames and E.coli bacterial
`tests, CHO-KI gene mutation assay) or clastogeniceither in vitro (chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes)
`or in vivo (micronucleus test in Fats).
`
`Impairment of Fertility: Studies to investigate the effect of ARIMIDEX on fertility have not been
`conducted; however, chronic studies indicated hypertrophyofthe ovaries and the presence offollicular cysts in rats
`administered doses equalto or greater than | mg/kg/day (which produced plasma anastrozole C,,,,,, and AUC, bs
`that were 19 and 9 times higher than the respective values found in healthy post-menopausal humans at the
`recommended dose).
`In addition, hyperplastic uteri were observed in chronic studies of female dogs administered
`doses equal to or greater than | mg/kg/day (which produced plasmaanastrozole C..., and AUC,,,,,, that were 22
`times and 16 times higher than the respective values found in post-menopausal humans at the recommended dose).
`It is not known whetherthese effects on the reproductive organsofanimals are associated with impaired fertility in
`
`humans.
`
`Pregnancy: Pregnancy Category D: (See WARNINGS).
`
`It is not known if anastrozole is excreted in human milk. Because many drugs are
`Nursing Mothers:
`excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when ARIMIDEX is administered to a hursing woman.
`(See
`WARNINGSand PRECAUTIONS.)
`
`Pediatric Use: The safety and efficacy ofARIMIDEXin pediatric patients have not been established.
`
`Geriatric Use: In studies 0027 and 0030 about 50% ofpatients were 65 or older. Patients > 65 years ofage
`had moderately better tumor response and timeto tumorprogression than patients < 65 years of age regardless of
`randomized treatment. In studies 0004 and 0005, fifty percent ofpatients were65 or older. Response rates and time .
`to progression were similar for the over 65 and younger patients.
`
`ADVERSE REACTIONS
`First Line Therapy: ARIMIDEX was generally well tolerated in two well-controlled clinical trials (i.e,
`Trials 0030 and 0027). Adverse events occurrin.
`‘with anincidenceofat-teast5% ineither treatment
`
`
`
`
`proup offrials
`0030 and 0027 during or within 2 weeks of the end of treatmentare shown in Table 5.
`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`C
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`(
`
`Page 13
`
`APMt ans wre ag
`gait
`oa
`cs - ve - od
`
`PRON a te es ut
`t.
`aed
`cc
`:
`hogs
`he
`
`a
`

`
`ARIMIDEX H-6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEX is a trademark, the property of Zenecz Limited.
`
`

`

`(
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`(
`
`.
`
`Page 14
`
`Body system
`Adverse event*
`
`Table 5
`
`Number(%) ofsubjects
`ARIMIDEX
`Tamoxifen
`(n=506)
`(n=S11)
`
`_
`
`Musculoskeletal
`
`Nervous .
`
`Whole body
`83 (16.4)
`Asthenia
`70 (13.8)
`Pain ©
`60 (11.9)
`- Back pain
`47
`(9.3)
`Headache
`40
`(7.9)
`Abdominalpain
`37
`(7.3)
`Chest pain
`35
`(6.9)
`Flu syndrome
`23
`(4.5)
`Pelvic pain
`Cardiovascular
`128 (25.3)
`Vasodilation
`25°
`(4.9)
`Hypertension
`Digestive
`94
`(18.6)
`Nausea
`47
`(9.3)
`Constipation
`40
`(7.9)
`Diarrhea
`38
`(7.5)
`Vomiting
`26
`(5.1)
`Anorexia
`Metabolic and nutritional
`51
`(10.1)
`Peripheral edema
`54 (10.7)
`Bonepain
`30
`(5.9)
`Dizziness
`30
`(5.9)
`Insomnia
`23
`(4.5)
`Depression
`16
`(3.2)
`Hypertonia
`Respiratory
`55 (10.9)
`Cough increased
`51
`(10.1)
`Dyspnea
`49
`(9.7)
`Pharyngitis
`Skin and appendages
`38
`(7.5)
`Rash
`Urogenital
`9
`(1.8)
`Leukorrhea
`* A patient may have had morethan 1 adverse event.
`Less frequent adverse experiences reported in patients receiving ARIMIDEX | mg in either Trial 0030 or
`
`Trial 0027 were similar to those reported for second-line th fe . .NOtoseJL Cie
`
`
`
`reportedforsecond-linetherapy.
`
`.
`
`81 (15.9)
`73 (14.3)
`68 (13.3)
`40 (7.8)
`38 (7.4)
`37 (7.2)
`30 (5.9)
`30 (5.9)
`106 (20.7)
`36 (7.0)
`106 (20.7)
`66 (12.9)
`33
`(6.5)
`36 (7.0)
`46 (9.0)
`41
`(8.0)
`52 (10.2)
`22 (4.3)
`38 (5.5)
`32
`(6.3)
`26 (5.1)
`52 (10.2)
`47 (9.2)
`68 (13.3)
`34 (7.6)
`3I
`(6.1)
`
`.
`
`,
`
`:
`

`
`ARIMIDEX H-4 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark. the property of Zeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`C
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`
`(anastrozole) Fablets
`
`(
`
`:
`
`Page 15
`
`Based on results from second-line therapy and the established safety profile oftamoxifen, the incidences of
`9 prespecified adverse event categories
`potentially
`causally
`related to one or both ofthe therapies because of their
`pharmacology werestatistically analyzed. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups.
`
`Table 6
`Number (n) and Percentage of Patients
`ARIMIDEX
`NOLVADEX
`1 mg
`20 mg
`(n = 506)
`(n= 511)
`n
`n
`(%)
`(%)
`Adverse Event Group*
`23
`(4.5)
`32
`(6.3)
`Depression
`15
`(3.0)
`18
`(3.5)
`TumorFlare
`18
`(3.5)
`33
`(6.5)
`Thromboembolic Disease"
`5
`15
`Venous®
`13
`19
`Coronary and Cerebral‘
`(33.6)
`170
`196
`Gastrointestinal Disturbance
`(26.5)
`134
`118
`Hot Flushes
`(1.7)
`9
`3
`Vaginal Dryness
`(1.2)
`6
`15
`Lethargy
`(1.0)
`5
`1]
`Vaginal Bleeding
`(2.2)
`Il
`8
`Weight Gain
`*A patient may have had more than | adverse event
`"Includes pulmonary embolus, thrombophlebitis, retinal vein thrombosis
`‘Includes myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, anginapectoris, cerebrovascular accident, cerebral ischemia
`and cerebral infarct
`
`(38.4)
`(23.1)
`(0.6)
`(2.9)
`(2.2)
`(1.6)
`
`<
`
`Despite the lack ofestrogenic activity for Arimidex,there was no increase in myocardial infarction or fracture when
`
`compared with tamoxifen.
`
`Second Line Therapy: ARIMIDEX was generally well tolerated in two well-controlled clinicaltrials (i.c.,
`Trials 0004 and 0005), with less than 3.3% ofthe ARIMIDEX-treated patients and 4.0% ofthe megestrol acetate-
`treated patients withdrawing dueto an adverse event.
`
`The principal adverse event more common with ARIMIDEX than megestrol! acetate was diarrhea. Adverse
`events reported in greater than 5% ofthe patients in any ofthe treatment groups in these two well-controlled clinical
`trials, regardless of Causality, are presented below:
`
`"Add: Table70
`Number(n) and Percentage ofPatients with Adverse Event!
`7
`
`ARIMIDEX
`
`ARIMIDEX
`
`_ Megestrol
`Acetate
`
`ARIMIDEX H-~6 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`ARIMIDEX®
`(
`Page 16eeee
`I mg
`10 mg
`-160 mg
`(n = 262)
`(n = 246)
`(n= 253)
`n
`n
`a
`%
`%
`%
`Adverse Event
`42
`(16.0)
`33
`(13.4)
`47
`(18.6)
`Asthenia
`41
`(15.6)
`48
`(19.5)
`28
`(11D)
`Nausea
`34
`(13.0)
`44
`(17.9)
`24
`(9.5)
`Headache
`32
`(12.2)
`29
`(10.6)
`21
`(8.3)
`Hot Flushes
`28
`(10.7)
`38
`(15.4)
`29°
`(11.5)
`Pain
`
`
`Back Pain 28=(10.7) 26 (10.6) 19 (7.5)
`
`
`
`Dyspnea
`24
`(9.2)
`27
`(11.0)
`53
`(20.9)
`Vomiting
`24
`(9.2)
`26
`(10.6)
`16
`(6.3)
`Cough Increased
`22
`(8.4)
`18
`(7.3)
`19
`(7.5)
`Diarrhea
`22
`(8.4)
`18
`(7.3)
`7
`(2.8)
`Constipation
`18
`(6.9)
`18
`(7.3)
`21°
`(8.3)
`Abdominal Pain
`18
`(6.9)
`14
`(5.7)
`18
`(7.1)
`Anorexia
`18
`(6.9)
`19
`(7.7)
`Th
`(4.3)
`Bone Pain
`17
`(6.5)
`26
`(11.8)
`19
`(7.5)
`Pharyngitis
`16
`(6.1)
`23
`(9.3)
`1S
`(5.9)
`Dizziness
`16
`(6.1)
`12)
`(4.9)
`15
`(5.9)
`Rash
`1S
`(5.7)
`15
`(6.1)
`19
`(7.5)
`Dry Mouth
`15
`(5.7)
`YW
`(4.5)
`13
`(5.1)
`Peripheral Edema
`14
`(5.3)
`21
`(8.5)
`28
`(11.1)
`Pelvic Pain
`‘14°
`(5.3)
`17
`(6.9)
`13
`(5.1)
`Depression
`14
`(5.3)
`6
`(2.4)
`3
`(2.0)
`Chest Pain
`13
`(5.0)
`18
`(7.3)
`13
`(5.1)
`Paresthesia
`12
`(4.6)
`AS
`(6.1)
`9
`(3.6)
`Vaginal Hemorrhage
`6
`(2.3)
`4
`(1.6)
`3)
`(5.1)
`Weight Gain
`4
`(1.5)
`9
`(3.7)
`30
`(11.9)
`Sweating
`4
`(1.5)
`3
`(1.2)
`16
`(6.3)
`Increased Appetite
`0
`(0)
`I
`(0.4)
`3 (5.1)
`"A patient may have more than one adverse event.
`Otherless frequent (2% to 5%)adverse experiences reported in patients receiving ARIMIDEX | ing in either
`Trial 0004 or Trial 0005 are listed below. These adverse experiences are listed by body system and are in order of
`decreasing frequency within each body system regardless ofassessed causality.
`
`Body as a Whole: Flu syndrome;fever; neck pain; malaise; accidental injury; infection
`
`Cardiovascular: Hypertension; thrombophlebitis
`
`Hepatic: Gamma GTincreased: SGOTincreased: SGPTincreased
`
`Hematologic: Anemia; leukopenia
`
`ARIMIDEX H-4 05-00.doc
`ARIMIDEXis a trademark, the property ofZeneca Limited.
`
`

`

`ARIMIDEX®
`
`(anastrozole) Tablets
`
`'
`
`Page 17
`
`Metabolic and Nutritional: Alkaline phosphatase increased: weight| ss
`
`levels increased by 0.5 mmol/L among patients receiving ARIMIDEX.
`Mean serum total cholesterol
`Increases in LDL cholesterol have been shown to contribute to these changes.
`
`Musculoskeletal: Myalgia; arthralgia: pathological fracture
`
`Nervous: Somnolence; confusion; insomnia; anxiety; nervousness
`
`Respiratory: Sinusitis; bronchitis: rhinitis
`
`Skin and Appendages: Hair thinning; pruritus
`
`Urogenital: Urinary tract infection; breast pain
`
`Vaginalbleeding has been reported infrequently, mainly in patients during the first few weeks after changing
`from existing hormonal therapy to treatment with ARIMIDEX.
`If bleeding persists, further evaluation should be
`
`considered.
`
`Duringclinical trials and bostmarketing experience joint pain/stiffness has been reported in association with
`the use of ARIMIDEX.
`.
`——a
`
`The incidences of the following adverse

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket