throbber
' Mm
`
`3 2 4
`
`
`
`|
`
`HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY
`UNIVERSITYOFWISCONSIN
`
`SIKTY-SIKTA
`annual meeting
`of the
`American Association
`for Cancer Research
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`ELEVENTH
`annual meeting
`of the
`American Society
`ot Clinical Oncology
`MAY ZIl, IGA
`San Diego, Calfornio
`
`
`
`Volume 16: March 1975
`
`CELGENE 2126
`CELGENE 2126
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`“APOTEX v. CELGENE
`IPR2023-00512
`IPR2023-00512
`
`

`

`Proceedings of the
`American Association for Cancer Research
`and
`American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`Sidney Weinhouse, Editor
`
`Margaret Foti, Managing Editor
`
`
`AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, INC.
`
`OFFICERS
`
`(1974-1975)
`
`President, Van R. Potter
`
`Vice President, Charlotte Friend
`
`Secretary-Treasurer, Hugh J. Creech
`
`BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`
`Term Expiring May 1975
`
`ThomasC, Hall
`G. A. LePage
`
`Carl G. Baker
`Paul Calabresi
`
`Term Expiring May 1976
`
`Van R., Potter
`Frank M. Schabel, Jr.
`
`Charlotte Friend
`Ludwik Gross
`
`Term Expiring May 1977
`
`Seymour S. Cohen
`George H. Hitchings
`
`Mortimer L. Mendelsohn
`Elizabeth C. Miller
`
`Ex Officio
`
`Sidney Weinhouse
`Hugh J. Creech
`
`
`AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, INC.
`
`OFFICERS
`
`(1974-1975)
`
`President, Rose Ruth Ellison
`
`President Elect, Joseph R. Bertino
`
`Immediate Past President, Bayard D. Clarkson
`
`Secretary-Treasurer, Audrey E. Evans
`
`BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`
`Daniel Bergsagel
`
`Vincent T. DeVita
`
`Albert H. Owens, Jr.
`
`
`Copyright 1975 by Cancer Research, Inc. Published for Cancer Research, Inc., and the
`American Association for Cancer Research, Inc., by The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore,
`Md. 21202, and included in subscriptions to the journal CANCER RESEARCH.
`
`

`

`617 REMISSION INDUCTION IN REFRACTORY MYELO-
`BLASTIC LEUKEMIA WITH CONTINUOUS INFU-
`SION OF 5-AZACYTIDINE. W.R. Vogler, D. Miller
`and J.W. Keller. Emory Univ., Atlanta, Ga.
`30322 and Duke Univ., Durham, N.C. 27710
`(For Southeastern Cancer Study Group)
`Rapid infusions of 5-azacytidine in
`doses of 100mg/M2 or greater produce severe
`nausea, vomiting and occasional diarrhea,
`thus limiting its therapeutic use.
`In this
`study doses of 50-400mg/M2/day were infused
`continuously for 5-day courses at intervals
`of 14-25 days. The use of Ringer's lactate
`and frequent (q3-I2hr) changes of solutions
`insured drug stability. The majority of
`patients, all with refractory myeloblastic
`Jeukemia, received 150mg/M2/day. Doses were
`escalated by 50mg/M2 increments in 6 of 22
`patients. All 22 patients received at least
`2 courses of treatment. Complete remissions
`occurred in 7(32%) and partial remissions in
`3(14%).
`In general
`the drug was well
`toler-
`ated, however, nauSea and vomiting became
`troublesome at doses of 200mg/M2 or more.
`The results indicate that 5-azacytidine
`given by continuous infusion is an active
`agent in the treatment of refractory myelo-
`blastic leukemia and worthy of further in-
`vestigation.
`
`61
`
`CYLINDROID LAMELLA-PARTICLE COMPLEXES IN
`MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA OF NORTHERN PIKE (E.
`lucius). Clyde J. Dawe, William G. Banfield,
`Cecil W. Lee, Herman J. Michelitch, and Ron
`Sonstegard. National Institutes of Health,
`Bethesda, Md. 20014 and Univ. of Guelph,
`Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
`Malignant lymphoma in northern pike is
`enzootic in North America, Ireland, and Sweden.
`Experimental and field studies have indicated
`the disease is transmissible. We report intra-
`cytoplasmic cylindroid structures visualized by
`transmission electron microscopy in pike lymph-
`oma cells. Cylindroid bodies range from 2 to
`4 um.
`in length. and 0.8 to 1.0 pm.
`in diameter.
`Their walls are composed of alternating layers
`of dense lamellae and dense particles.
`The
`dense lamellae average about 90 A° in thickness
`and the particles about 260 A? in diameter.
`Often the inner and outer surfaces of the walls
`of the cylindroids are covered by two wavy
`membranes enclosing a space similar to the
`perinuclear cisterna.
`The cylindroids in pike
`lymphoma cells resemble those described in
`human "hairy cell" leukemia and in EB virus-
`transformed human embryo cells. Their sig-
`nificance and manner of development are not
`understood.
`One concept is that the particles
`are RNA and the membranes are part of the
`endoplasmic reticulum: Another possibility is
`that the particles are DNA and the membranes
`are derived from nuclear membrane.
`
`AACR Abstracts, 1975
`
`IMPROVEMENT
`619 MULTIPLE LEUKOCYTE WASHING:
`IN CELL~MEDIATED IMMUNITY IN LUNG CAN-
`CER. Patrick C. Marabella, Hiroshi Takita,
`Mitsuru Takada and Jun Minowada. Roswell
`Park Memorial
`Institute, Buffalo, N.Y. 14203
`This study was undertaken to investigate
`the possibility of a "blocking factor"! adhe-
`rent
`to leukocytes in lung cancer.
`The leukocyte migration inhibition test
`using leukocytes isolated from heparinized
`peripheral blood of 28 previously untreated
`lung cancer patients was employed.
`The leu-
`kocytes were washed comparatively three and
`six times.
`The antigen used was a tumor
`extract of a cultured cell
`line of lung car-
`cinoma. Twenty-five of the 28 cases had im-
`proved percent
`inhibition with six times
`wash.
`The overall percent migration inhi-
`bition of the three times washed group was
`-1.3 + 4.4% and that of the six times washed
`group being 13.9 + 4.6%.
`The 11
`localized
`cases had percentinhibitions of 14.3 + 4.5
`and 26.4 + 7.1% for three and six times
`washed groups respectively.
`The 17 dissem-
`inated cases had percent
`inhibition of -12.5
`+ 6.8% and 4.5 + 3.9% for three and six times
`washed.
`~
`It appears that multiple washing of
`leukocytes improves in vitro cellular immunity
`in lung cancer patients and moreso in dissem-
`inated localized cases.
`Impaired cellular
`immunity in lung cancer may be due to some
`"blocking factor’! adherent
`to the leukocytes.
`
`620 PATTERNS OF SPLEEN CELL (SC) MIGRATION
`IN VITRO IN SPONTANEOUSLY METASTASIZING
`AND NON-METASTASTZING MAMMARY TUMOR (MT) HOSTS:
`POSSIBLE IMMUNE ESCAPE MECHANISM. U. Kim and
`G. Montessori. Roswell Park Memorial Institute,
`Buffalo, N. Y. 14203
`In vitro demonstration of positive lym
`phocyte cytotoxicity in patients with a rapidly
`growing or widely disseminated cancer is one of
`the most puzzling phenomena in tumor immunology.
`To gain a better understanding of this immune
`response in a well defined experimental systen,
`the patterns of SC migration and migration in-
`hibition were studied by the standard MIF test
`procedure with 4 spontaneonsly metastasizing,
`antigen-shedding and in 3 non-metastasizing,
`non-shedding rat MT.
`The SC from non-metasta-
`sizing MT hosts migrated as well as normal SC
`or was often slightly stinmmlated in the blank
`culture media. However, SC migration from: the
`metastasizing MT hosts was markedly inhibited
`(40-60%) in the media indicating that their
`physical capacity to migrate was impaired. By
`incubating the SC from the former group with
`their respective MT extract, their migration
`was inhibited by 30-40%. On the other hand,
`the inhibited SC migration in the latter group
`was usually restored to normal levels or even
`stimulated upon exposure to their own MT ex-
`tract. This inhibition or stimulation was
`tumor specific.
`The significance of "blocking" and "un-
`blocking" effects of specific MT antigens will
`be discussed in terms of both antigen-antibody
`on the lymphocyte surface and the relative mi-
`gration patterns between SC and thymus cells.
`
`MARCH 1975
`
`155
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket