throbber

`A mM | Ze 3
`;
`
`HEALTH SCIENCES LIBRARY
`
`UNIVERSITYOFWISCONSIN
`SIXTY-SIXTH
`annual meeting
`of the
`American Association
`for Cancer Research
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`ELEVENTH
`annual meeting
`of the
`American Society
`of Clinical Cheoay
`MAY AIT, IG/
`San Diego, California
`
`
`
`Volume 16: March 19/5
`
`CELGENE 2096
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`IPR2023-00512
`
`

`

`Proceedings of the
`American Association for Cancer Research
`and
`American Society of Clinical Oncology
`
`Sidney Weinhouse, Editor
`
`Margaret Foti, Managing Editor
`
`
`AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH, INC.
`
`OFFICERS
`
`(1974-1975)
`
`President, Van R. Potter
`
`Vice President, Charlotte Friend
`
`Secretary-Treasurer, Hugh J. Creech
`
`BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`
`Term Expiring May 1975
`
`ThomasC. Hall
`G. A. LePage
`
`Carl G. Baker
`Paul Calabresi
`
`Term Expiring May 1976
`
`Van R. Potter
`Frank M. Schabel, Jr.
`
`Charlotte Friend
`Ludwik Gross
`
`Term Expiring May 1977
`
`SeymourS. Cohen
`George H. Hitchings
`
`Mortimer L. Mendelsohn
`Elizabeth C. Miller
`
`Hugh J. Creech
`
`Sidney Weinhouse
`
`Ex Officio
`
`AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, INC.
`
`OFFICERS
`
`(1974-1975)
`
`President, Rose Ruth Ellison
`
`President Elect, Joseph R. Bertino
`
`Immediate Past President, Bayard D. Clarkson
`
`Secretary-Treasurer, Audrey E. Evans
`
`BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`
`Daniel Bergsagel
`
`Vincent T. DeVita
`
`Albert H. Owens,Jr.
`
`
`Copyright 1975 by Cancer Research, Inc. Published for Cancer Research, Inc., and the
`American Association for Cancer Research, Inc., by The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore,
`Md. 21202, and included in subscriptions to the journal CANCER RESEARCH.
`
`

`

`AACR Abstracts, 1975
`
`205 CYTOTOXICITY OF COPPER AND IRON
`COMPLEXES OF 5-SUBSTITUTED-2-
`FORMYLPYRIDINE THIOSEMICARBAZONES (HL).
`D. H. Petering, W. Antholine, J. M.
`Knight, and H. G. Petering, Department
`of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-
`Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201 and
`Department of Environmental Health,
`University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
`OH 45219.
`The cytotoxicity of metal com-
`plexes of HL against Ehrlich ascites
`tumor cells has been examined. Short
`in vitro incubation of cells and drugs
`followed by implantation of cells into
`mice and observations of tumor growth
`was used to assess cytotoxic effects.
`Using 5x10% cells/ml and 2 mg/ml of the
`iron complexes,
`the following order of
`activities was observed, beginning with
`the least active complex, OH < -OCOCH;
`~ -N(CH3)2 < H < -CH3 ~ -Cl
`~
`-CF3.
`The
`last two complexes completely prevent
`tumor development over long periods.
`At 0.1 mg/ml copper complexes of 5-H
`and 5-CH; completely inhibit trans-
`plantation.
`In contrast,
`2 mg/ml of
`the 5-H ligand has less effect than
`either its iron or copper complex.
`These results indicate that metal com-
`plexes of HL as well as parent ligands
`need to be examined for their anti-
`tumor properties.
`(Supported by NCI
`CA 16156.)
`
`206 MORPHOLOGICAL MODIFICATION OF A VIRUS-
`INDUCED LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA BY THYMECTOMY
`AND ANTILYMPHOCYTE SERUM.
`Steven L. Dresler,
`Peter J. Dawson, and A. Howard Fieldsteel.
`Univ. Oregon Med. Sch., Portland, Ore. 97201
`and Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park,
`Ca. 94025.
`Since most human lymphocytic leukemias in
`contrast to murine leukemias possess B-cell
`markers, we attempted to induce with virus a
`murine leukemia of B-cell origin. Groups of
`BALB/c mice were thymectomized at 5-7 days of
`age,
`treated with antilymphocyte serum (ALS) on
`days 7, 8 and 9 and inoculated on day 8 with
`lymphatic leukemia virus (LLV-F)
`isolated from
`Friend virus. Control animals were either thy-
`mectomized and given ALS (and no virus) or were
`sham-thymectomized and inoculated with virus.
`Control animals developed lymphocytic leukemia
`involving thymus, periarteriolar sheaths of
`spleen, portal areas of liver,
`lymph nodes and
`bone marrow.
`Immunofluorescence showed 6 anti-
`gen on leukemic lymphocytes and absence of
`immunoglobulins.
`In thymectomized mice,
`leu-
`kemia developed later and involved the splenic
`red pulp, hepatic sinusoids and bone marrow.
`Lymph nodes and periarteriolar sheaths of the
`spleen were spared. Cytologically the cells
`were different and lacked both T and B cell
`determinants. Possible explanations are the
`transformation of a different clone of lympho-
`cytes by LLV-F,
`the unmasking of trace amounts
`of Friend virus or the presence of another leu-
`kemia virus.
`Supported by grants CA-15072 and CA-07868
`from the National Cancer Institute.
`
`207 PHASE I STUDY OF 5-AZACYTIDINE USING 24 HRS
`CONTINUOUS INFUSION FOR 5 DAYS. Pavel L.
`Lomen, V. K. Vaitkevicius, and Michael K. Samson.
`Dept. of Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit,
`Mich. 48201
`The biological and antitumor activity of
`5-azacytidine (5-azaCR) has been well demon-—
`strated in the past. The drug at present is
`thought by most to be primarily cell cycle phase
`specific. This study was designed to eliminate
`undesirable side effects occurring with a bolus
`dose and to confirm the recent findings of rela-
`tive stability of 5-azaCR's solution with pre-
`served biological and antitumor activity.
`In
`the study we determined that 150 ng/m2/day given
`as a 120 hr continuous intravenous infusion, re-
`peated at 28 day intervals produced safe, man-
`ageable, and reproducible toxicity.
`The drug
`was freshly prepared at 4 hr intervals. Eleven
`courses were administered to 6 patients at this
`dose level. No patient experienced nausea or
`vomiting, Leukopenia was the major toxicity.
`Mean nadir of WBC was 2.6 x 103 (range 0:7-6.1).
`Day 17 was the mean day to nadir with recovery
`occurring within 2-13 days.
`In only 3 courses
`was thrombocytopenia (7-92 x 10%) produced.
`In
`two patients multiple samples of plasma and
`urine were analyzed by microbiologic assay.
`There was no 5-azaCR detected in the plasma sam-
`ples.
`In 24 hr urine collections,
`there was
`0.89% and 0.74% of free azacytidine detected.
`Antitumor activity was demonstrated in one pa-
`tient with colon cancer and another with Ameri-
`can Burkitt's lymphoma. Analysis of this study
`confirmed our expectations and pointed out some
`new aspects of 5-azaCR metabolism.
`
`208 MECHANISM OF 5-FLUOROURIDINE TOXICITY IN
`NOVIKOFF HEPATOMA CELLS. David §.
`Wilkinson and Jeanne Crumley. University of
`South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620.
`Several of the fluorinated pyrimidines
`have the ability to inhibit rRNA maturation.
`This effect appears to be a significant factor
`in the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouridine (FUrd)
`in Novikoff hepatoma cells.
`The incorporation
`of labeled precursors into mature 18S and 28S
`rRNA is completely inhibited by the simulta-
`neous addition of 1xl074M FUrd, whereas the
`cells must be preincubated with this drug for
`2 hrs before comparable inhibition of DNA
`synthesis occurs. When cells are incubated
`with 1xl0-5M FUrd for one hr, washed, resus-
`pended in fresh medium for 1 hr and then
`exposed to [3H] guanosine for 90 min, one finds
`little or no incorporation of precursor into
`mature 18S or 28S rRNA. Under similar condi-
`tions,
`there is very little inhibition of DNA
`synthesis. Cells exposed to 1x10-5M FUrd for
`one hr and then allowed to incubate for one
`hr in analog-free media do not grow when sub-
`cultured into Standard media.
`The addition of
`1x1074M uridine (Urd) during analog exposure
`prevents most of the growth inhibition,
`whereas the addition of 1x10~4M thymidine (Thd)
`has little effect.
`Thd, which can prevent the
`inhibition of DNA synthesis by FUrd, does not
`prevent the inhibition of rRNA maturation.
`However, Urd, which blocks the growth inhibi-
`tory effects of FUrd, also blocks the inhibi-
`tion of rRNA maturation.
`(Supported by DRG-
`1220 and ACS F73FS-2).
`
`52
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF AACR AND ASCO
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket