throbber
The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-023-00826-1
`
`RESEARCH ARTICLE
`
`Integration of Biorelevant Pediatric Dissolution Methodology
`into PBPK Modeling to Predict In Vivo Performance and Bioequivalence
`of Generic Drugs in Pediatric Populations: a Carbamazepine
`Case Study
`
`Gopal Pawar1 · Fang Wu2 · Liang Zhao2 · Lanyan Fang2 · Gilbert J. Burckart3 · Kairui Feng2 · Youssef M. Mousa2 ·
`Abdullah Al Shoyaib2 · Marie-Christine Jones1 · Hannah K. Batchelor4
`
`Received: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 May 2023 / Published online: 29 June 2023
`© The Author(s) 2023
`
`Abstract
`This study investigated the impact of gastro-intestinal fluid volume and bile salt (BS) concentration on the dissolution of car-
`bamazepine (CBZ) immediate release (IR) 100 mg tablets and to integrate these in vitro biorelevant dissolution profiles into
`physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling (PBPK) in pediatric and adult populations to determine the biopredictive
`dissolution profile. Dissolution profiles of CBZ IR tablets (100 mg) were generated in 50–900 mL biorelevant adult fasted
`state simulated gastric and intestinal fluid (Ad-FaSSGF and Ad-FaSSIF), also in three alternative compositions of biorelevant
`pediatric FaSSGF and FaSSIF medias at 200 mL. This study found that CBZ dissolution was poorly sensitive to changes in the
`composition of the biorelevant media, where dissimilar dissolution (F2 = 46.2) was only observed when the BS concentration
`was changed from 3000 to 89 μM (Ad-FaSSIF vs Ped-FaSSIF 50% 14 BS). PBPK modeling demonstrated the most predictive
`dissolution volume and media composition to forecast the PK was 500 mL of Ad-FaSSGF/Ad-FaSSIF media for adults and
`200 mL Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF media for pediatrics. A virtual bioequivalence simulation was conducted by using Ad-FaSSGF
`and/or Ad-FaSSIF 500 mL or Ped-FaSSGF and/or Ped-FaSSIF 200 mL dissolution data for CBZ 100 mg (reference and generic
`test) IR product. The CBZ PBPK models showed bioequivalence of the product. This study demonstrates that the integration
`of biorelevant dissolution data can predict the PK profile of a poorly soluble drug in both populations. Further work using
`more pediatric drug products is needed to verify biorelevant dissolution data to predict the in vivo performance in pediatrics.
`
`Keywords carbamazepine tablets · in vitro dissolution · PBPK · pediatric biorelevant dissolution media ·
`virtual bioequivalence
`
`Introduction
`
`Dissolution is commonly used as an in vitro testing
`method for orally administered drug products, such as
`tablets. Typically, biopredictive dissolution methods can
`
`use biorelevant media that is designed to simulate the
`composition of gastrointestinal (GI) fluids, such as fasted
`state simulated gastric fluid (FaSSGF) and fasted state
`simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF) which are both derived
`from the  characterization of healthy adults GI media
`
` * Gopal Pawar
`G.Pawar@bham.ac.uk
` * Fang Wu
`Fang.Wu@fda.hhs.gov
` * Hannah K. Batchelor
`Hannah.batchelor@strath.ac.uk
`
`1 School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences,
`University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
`2 Division of Quantitative Methods and Modelling, Office
`of Research and Standard, Office of Generic Drug Products,
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food
`and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993,
`USA
`3 Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational
`Science, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United
`States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring,
`Maryland 20993, USA
`Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical
`Sciences, University of Strathclyde, 161 Cathedral Street,
`Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
`
`4
`
`CELGENE 2048
`1 3
`Vol.:(0123456789)
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`IPR2023-00512
`
`

`

`
`
` 67 Page 2 of 18
`
`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`composition (1, 2). However, the solubility of drug sub-
`stances (and hence dissolution profiles of oral drug products)
`in pediatric GI fluid may be different from those in adults due
`to inherent differences in GI fluid volume (3) and composi-
`tion, for example in terms of bile salt (BS) concentrations (4).
`Biorelevant pediatric Ped-FaSSGF media has been
`proposed previously, based on literature-reported BS
`concentration (5, 6), where values were lower in neonates
`(20  μM) and infants (60  μM) in comparison to adults
`(80 μM). Moreover, due to the lack of accurate data on
`pediatric BS concentrations, simulated Ped-FaSSIF media
`with BS concentrations corresponding to 50 and 150% (1.5
`and 4.5 mM) of adult content (3 mM) were proposed as
`an alternative media for exploratory studies (5). Recent
`studies that characterized pediatric gastric and intestinal
`fluids measured a lower BS concentration in pediatric
`fasted state intestinal fluids compared to adults (0.18 mM
`vs 3 mM) (4, 7–9) providing new data on which pediatric
`simulated media can be developed.
`The volume of dissolution media is a critical factor in
`designing the in vitro dissolution method for poorly solu-
`ble drug substances. Generally, the recommended dissolu-
`tion volume in USP I/II apparatus is 500 mL, which more
`closely resembles the GI volume in adults (10). The vol-
`ume of fluids in pediatric populations has been reported
`in two recent studies where the fasted gastric volume was
`reported to be a maximum of 8 mL in a population from 0
`to 16 years (n = 32) (3) although an alternative study sug-
`gested a median volume of 5.0 mL in infants and 26.6 mL in
`adolescents (11). The corresponding fasted state intestinal
`fluids were reported to reach a maximum of 51 mL in a
`population from 0 to 16 years (n = 32) (3) or have a median
`volume of 23.9 mL in infants and 62.9 mL in adolescents
`(11). When considering the dissolution volume to use, an
`important consideration is the fluid volume administered
`with a tablet which is typically 240 mL in adults whereas
`previous data on relative bioavailability studies suggest a
`volume of 120 mL in children (12, 13).
`Physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) mode-
`ling uses mathematical models and simulations to combine
`animal or human physiological data with drug character-
`istics to mechanistically describe the PK behaviors of a
`drug (14). PBPK has been particularly useful in pediatric
`drug development as it can factor ontogeny into relevant
`predictions (15–17), making quantitative predictions in
`pregnancy and in the fetus (18, 19), and in examining
`pediatric predictions in drug absorption in varying age
`groups (20). PBPK models can also incorporate in vitro
`dissolution data to predict the in vivo performance of oral
`formulations and to verify the clinical relevance of in vitro
`dissolution data (21–23). The identification of a biopredic-
`tive dissolution method for pediatric populations and sub-
`sequent integration of the generated dissolution data into
`
`1 3
`
`PBPK modeling would aid in de-risking pediatric clinical
`programs, specifically with reference to relative bioavail-
`ability studies or bioequivalence (BE) studies for generic
`drug products. Furthermore, virtual bioequivalence (VBE)
`trials using PBPK modeling could provide a powerful tool
`to predict and compare the in vivo performance of test
`drug products and reference listed drug (RLD) products
`by integrating the dissolution data generated by using
`the biorelevant medias and the inclusion of inter-subject
`variabilities.
`Carbamazepine (CBZ) is an anti-convulsant drug used
`in adults/pediatric populations to control seizures and as a
`mood-stabilizing drug in patients suffering from bipolar dis-
`order (trigeminal neuralgia), attention-deficit hyperactivity
`disorder (ADHD) and schizophrenia (24, 25). The solubil-
`ity of CBZ in water was measured to range from 0.14 to
`0.27 mg/L at 25°C (26) According to the Biopharmaceutics
`Classification System (BCS), CBZ is a BCS class II (poorly
`soluble; highly permeable) compound where dissolution is
`the rate limiting factor for its absorption (27). Due to its
`high pKa (11.8 or 14), no ionization of CBZ is expected
`within the physiological pH range (28). A previous study (5)
`showed that CBZ solubility in neonatal or infant FaSSGF,
`where the BS concentration was, respectively, 25% (20 μM)
`or 75% (60 μM) of adult values (80 μM), was significantly
`reduced at the lower BS concentrations. However, the impact
`on solubility of CBZ upon varying the BS concentration
`in FaSSIF media from 50 to 150% (1.5–4.5 mM) was not
`significant (29). The impact of gastric fluid volume (135 mL
`in neonates, 120 mL in infants) on the dissolution of the
`reference product, Tegretol© (carbamazepine) 200 mg tab-
`lets, was reported using the USP4 Flow-through-apparatus
`and media volumes selected to match those in neonates
`and infants. In all cases, dissolution was incomplete due to
`volume-limited dissolution (29). No data is available on dis-
`solution of CBZ pediatric suspensions which may be the
`more commonly used dosage form for such young patients.
`To better understand the impact of biorelevant dissolution
`conditions on the release of CBZ from a tablet formulation
`and to integrate these dissolution profiles into PBPK soft-
`ware to evaluate the impact on the predicted PK profile in
`pediatric and adult populations, this work seeks to explore
`the following objectives:
`
`• To compare in vitro dissolution profiles of CBZ IR tab-
`lets using industry recommended USP media as well as
`biorelevant simulated adult and pediatric medias.
`• To explore the impact of dissolution media volume on
`the dissolution profiles of CBZ tablet.
`• To compare the dissolution profiles of the RLD and
`generic CBZ 100 mg IR tablets using USP media, adult
`biorelevant, and our new proposed pediatric biorelevant
`media for PBPK-based virtual BE testing.
`
`

`

`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`Page 3 of 18 67
`
`• PBPK model development and validation for CBZ
`to identify the absorption factors that could result in
`bioinequivalence between pediatric and adult populations
`or between branded or generic CBZ product by integrat-
`ing the biorelevant dissolution data into a CBZ PBPK
`model.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Chemicals
`
`Bile Salts Cholic acid (CA); glycocholic acid (GC); glyc-
`ochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDC); glycodeoxycholic acid
`(GDC); glycoursodeoxycholic acid (GUDC); taurocholic
`acid (TC); taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDC); taurode-
`oxycholic acid (TDC); tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDC);
`taurolithocholic acid (TLC); deoxycholic acid (DC), litho-
`cholic acid (LC), and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDC) were
`purchased from either Sigma Aldrich (Gillingham, UK) or
`Acros Organics (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK).
`
`CBZ powder, sodium-lauryl-sulfate (SLS), lecithin, pep-
`sin, acetonitrile HPLC grade, sodium hydroxide (NaOH),
`and hydrochloric acid (HCL) were purchased from Sigma
`Aldrich (Gillingham, UK). Biorelevant powder (Ad-
`FaSSGF/Ad-FaSSIF) was purchased from Biorelevant
`(https:// biore levant. com/; London, UK).
`Tegretol© 100 mg tablets (Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK
`Limited, Batch No-B00964; Exp-07/2023) were used as
`RLD and Carbamazepine Medreich 100 mg tablets (Medre-
`ich PLC, Feltham, UK) as a generic product. Tegretol©
`was purchased from Queen Elizabeth Hospital Pharmacy
`(Birmingham, UK) and generic product from New Castle
`Healthcare NHS pharmacy.
`
`Preparation of Dissolution Media
`
`USP Media SLS (1% w/v) was added to Milli-Q Type-1
`(18.2 MΩ cm–1) water and stirred at 40°C for 2 h. The pH
`was adjusted to enable comparison with biorelevant dissolu-
`tion media. The pH of the USP media was adjusted (but not
`buffered) to either 1.2 (to mimic gastric pH) by adding 0.1
`N HCl or to 6.5 (to mimic intestinal pH) by adding 0.1 M
`NaOH before use. All pH-adjusted USP dissolution media
`were prepared on the day of the experiment and used within
`4 h of preparation (30, 31).
`
`Adult Biorelevant Media Ad-FaSSGF.V2 (pH 1.2) and Ad-
`FaSSIF.V2 (pH 6.5) (9, 32) were prepared according to the
`protocol provided by the supplier, Biorelevant (London, UK).
`The pH of the media Ad-FaSSGF.V2 was adjusted (but not
`
`buffered) to either 1.2 by adding 0.1 N HCl or to 6.5 by add-
`ing 0.1 M NaOH before use. Media was used within 48 h of
`preparation. FaSSIF V2 media is the most widely used simu-
`lated intestinal fluid despite more recent versions and reviews
`of further characterization of adult intestinal fluids (8, 32, 33).
`
`In the literature, FaSSGF-V2 has a pH value of 1.6, but we
`modified it to pH 1.2 for this study as described above. The
`traditional medium to simulate gastric conditions in the
`fasted state was USP simulated gastric fluid (SGF) which has
`a pH of 1.2. Note that due to the pH independent solubility
`of CBZ, this slight difference in pH would not have a sig-
`nificant impact on this study (34). In addition to this, a range
`of ~ 1 to 3 has been reported for gastric pH in fasted healthy
`humans after they have ingested a glass of water (35).
`In this study, Ad-FaSSGF contained taurocholate to represent
`the bile salt concentration (0.08 mM), phospholipids (0.02 mM),
`sodium (34 mM), and chloride (59 mM). The Ad-FaSSIF media
`contained taurocholate (3 mM), phospholipids (0.75 mM),
`sodium (148 mM), chloride (106 mM), and phosphate (29 mM).
`
`Pediatric Biorelevant Media
`
`Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF (14BS) Media Ped-FaSSGF containing
`14 bile salts (14BS) and Ped-FaSSIF (14BS) were prepared
`based on the median concentrations (mM) (0.016 mM for
`Ped-FaSSGF and 0.178 mM for Ped-FaSSIF) of bile acids
`present in the gastric or intestinal fluid samples aspirated
`from children reported previously (4). All the ingredients
`listed in Supplementary Table S1 were added to Milli-Q
`Type-1 (18.2 MΩ cm–1) water and stirred for 2 h until com-
`pletely dissolved; the pH of each media was then adjusted to
`either 1.2 by adding 0.1 N HCL or to 6.5 by adding NaOH
`before use. Ped-FaSSGF and Ped-FaSSIF were stored at 8°C
`and used within 48 h of preparation.
`
`Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF (50% 14BS) Media This media was pre-
`pared to contain 50% of the concentration of each BS reported
`previously (4) by diluting the Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF media
`containing the 14 BS with Milli-Q Type-1 water. As a result
`of dilution, the concentration of other components such as
`sodium chloride, lecithin, and pepsin was also reduced to 50%
`of the originally reported concentration. Finally, the pH of the
`prepared 50% 14BS media was adjusted to either pH 1.2 or
`6.5 by adding 0.1 N HCL or NaOH, respectively. This 50%
`version was included to provide a “worst-case” scenario as
`there was large variability in the measured bile salt concentra-
`tions from the GI fluids of pediatric participants (4).
`
`Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF (Na TCA) Media Ad-FaSSGF and Ad-
`FaSSIF contained only a single bile salt, Na TCA (3 mM
`in Ad-FaSSIF; 0.08  mM in Ad-FaSSGF); therefore,
`
`1 3
`
`

`

`
`
` 67 Page 4 of 18
`
`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`Ped-FaSSGF/FaSSIF media containing only Na TCA were
`also prepared. Na TCA concentrations mimicked the total
`bile acid concentration found in the 14 BS pediatric media.
`
`High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
`Method Development
`
`HPLC methodology was based on previous methods (36, 37)
`where the accuracy and specificity were previously reported.
`In brief, HPLC analysis of CBZ was carried out using an
`Agilent (1260 infinity 2) HPLC equipped with binary pump,
`DAD detector UV at 285 nm, and C18 column (Ascentis:
`25 cm, 5 μm, 4.6 mm). The mobile phase was water and
`acetonitrile at a ratio of 6:4 (v/v) which ran in isocratic mode
`at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 5
`μL, and the run time was 10 min (min), followed by 1-min
`post run to avoid any co-elution or carry-over of the analyte.
`
`Calibration Standards CBZ Calibration standards
`(0.002–1 mg/mL) were prepared in all the different adult/
`pediatric FaSSGF/FaSSIF media to exclude any interference
`or matrix effect (CBZ HPLC peak and calibration standards
`provided in Supplementary Figures S1A to S1K).
`
`In Vitro Dissolution Study
`
`Dissolution studies were conducted in accordance with USP
`dissolution (General chapter 711) guidelines (38) using USP
`apparatus 2 (Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK). The tem-
`perature of dissolution medium in vessels was maintained
`at 37.0°C ± 0.5°C. Six replicates/units were used for each
`experiment. The size of the dissolution vessel was changed
`for smaller volumes (200 mL, 100 mL, and 50 mL) to match
`the hydrodynamics of the standard vessels. To scale down
`the volumes, low-volume conversion kits (Copley, UK)
`comprising vessels of either 100- or 200-mL capacity with
`appropriate mini-paddles, vessel cover, and centering ring
`assemblies were used. One mL of dissolution medium was
`withdrawn without replacement at each pre-specified time
`point (15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min) and filtered using
`Agilent’s 13-mm syringe filters (polypropylene 0.45 μm pore
`size) before analysis using the validated HPLC method. A
`summary of the dissolution conditions is presented in Sup-
`plementary Table S2. The dissolution studies were all con-
`ducted using a 100 mg CBZ tablet. This tablet strength is not
`available in the USA but is available in the UK (25). This
`strength was selected to use the lowest dose to be applicable
`to pediatric populations and also to minimize the solubil-
`ity effects when evaluating the dissolution conditions (30);
`the lower strength enabled the maximum discrimination
`between the dissolution conditions and also accounts for the
`high permeability of CBZ to best enable integration into the
`PBPK modeling software.
`
`1 3
`
`Dissolution Data Analysis
`
`Similarity between two dissolution profiles was determined
`by the difference factor (F1) and similarity factor (F2) (39)
`calculated as follows:
`∑t=n
`||Rt − Tt
`||
`∑ t = n
`
`F1 =
`
`t=1
`
`× 100
`
`Rt
`
`t = 1
`
`(1)
`
`F2 = 50 × log[
`
`√
`1 +
`
`100
`
`∑ t = n
`
`]
`
`t)2
`
`(R
`t − T
`t = 1
`where Rt = Dissolution (% label claim) for reference (R) for-
`mulation at time t
`
`(2)
`
`Tt
`n
`
` Dissolution (% label claim) for test (T) formulation at
`time t.
` number of time points
`
`Generally, three or more dissolution sampling timepoints
`with one measurement after 85% dissolution are required to
`calculate F1 and F2. The compared dissolution profiles are
`considered similar when F1 ≤ 15 and F2 ≥ than 50.
`
`CBZ PBPK Model
`
`A PBPK model for CBZ was developed using SimCyp®
`Simulator (Version 21, Release 1; Certara UK Limited, Shef-
`field, UK) that incorporated drug-dependent and system-
`related input parameters obtained from SimCyp’s internal
`compound library (Supplementary Table S4). The in vitro
`dissolution datasets generated in the “In Vitro Dissolution
`Study” section were incorporated into SimCyp® Simula-
`tor Advanced Dissolution, Absorption and Metabolism
`(ADAM) model; full details of the dissolution data that was
`integrated are provided in Supplementary Table S3.
`The dissolution profiles using various BS concentrations
`and dissolution volumes were integrated into SimCYP
`according to the methods previously described by Guimaraes
`(2002) (40). In brief, a single-stage fasted intestinal profile
`(FaSSIF dissolution conditions as an intestinal profile) was
`integrated as the “intestinal profile.” Using this approach,
`the software considers the same dissolution profile for the
`stomach and intestinal compartments (FaSSIF dissolution
`conditions). A second scenario was also included where
`both the single-stage fasted gastric and intestinal profiles
`(input of the CBZ single-stage dissolution profile in fasted
`state simulated gastric fluids (FaSSGF) entered as “stomach
`profile” and single-stage dissolution profile in fasted state
`simulated intestinal fluids entered as “intestinal profile” thus
`incorporating both FaSSGF + FaSSIF dissolution conditions.
`
`

`

`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`Page 5 of 18 67
`
`Model prediction was validated using published clinical
`PK studies with CBZ (Tegretol© IR 100 or 200 mg) con-
`ducted in an adult population (41–44). Note that, here, the
`term validation is used as defined by Kuemmel 2019, “Process
`of determining the degree to which a model or simulation is
`an accurate representation of the real world.” In other terms,
`“validation relates to model (model form, model inputs),
`comparator (test samples, test conditions), and assessment
`(equivalency of input parameters, output comparisons)” (45).
`SimCyp Pediatric Version 21 (Release 1) was used as
`the pediatric PBPK (ped-PBPK) modeling platform. CBZ
`specific properties (including its metabolic clearance)
`used in the adult PBPK model (Supplementary Table S4)
`were transferred into the pediatric model (Supplementary
`Table S5). The metabolic clearance of CBZ is mediated by
`CYP3A4, CYP 3A5, and CYP2C8; hence, the ontogeny of
`CBZ-metabolizing enzymes in pediatric populations was
`expressed according to the following sigmoidal function
`(Eq. 3) which is a default equation used in SimCyp (46, 47).
`
`+ (F
`Fraction of adult = F
`− F
`max
`Birth
`Birth
`× Agen∕(Age50
`n + Agen)
`
`)
`
`(3)
`
`where Fmax is the maximum adult relative expression, Fbirth
`is the relative expression of enzyme at birth, Age50 is the age
`at which the fractional expression (/activity) is in the middle
`of the birth and adult values, and n is the exponent related to
`the sigmoidicity of the developmental curve or analogous to
`the Hill coefficient.
`In order to incorporate the age-dependent expression pat-
`tern of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2C8 in the pediatric
`PBPK model, the time to reach 50% maturation (Age50) for
`each enzyme was used. The Age50 of hepatic and intestinal
`CYP3A4 maturation was 0.64 and 2.36 years, respectively
`(47–49). For CYP3A5, since no age-dependent change in
`hepatic expression was noted (50), no ontogeny for hepatic
`CYP3A5 was assumed in this study but for intestinal ontog-
`eny, similar Age50 value (i.e., 2.36) of CYP3A4 was consid-
`ered. For CYP2C8 ontogeny, Age50 of hepatic maturation
`was 0.366 years (51). A zero value was used for intestinal
`CYP2C8 ontogeny due to lack of abundance data (52).
`Generally, young children have lower volume of distri-
`bution (Vss) for lipophilic drugs due to reduced body fat
`compared to adults. Due to lack of a volume of distribution
`(Vd) values in children, a Vd of 0.3 L/kg in young children
`(compared to 0.78–1.9 L/kg in adults) was estimated by our
`visual trial and error simulations in order to fit the pediatric
`PBPK model to the observed data (53). Moreover, the vol-
`ume of fluid intake with CBZ tablet was changed to 120 mL
`for pediatric populations compared to 240 mL for adult pop-
`ulations in line with reported clinical protocols (13).
`The CBZ model was validated in adults by calculating the
`prediction error percentage (PE%) fold error (FE), average
`
`fold error (AFE), and absolute average fold error (AAFE) for
`Cmax and AUC. The adult model was subsequently updated
`and applied to children (6–15 years) and further verified and
`validated using clinical PK data conducted in children on
`20 mg/kg dose (n = 12) by Hartley (1991) (54) and 9.3 mg/
`kg dose (n = 6) by Bano (1986) (55) (Table III).
`This PBPK model was also used to predict the plasma con-
`centration profile of CBZ in pediatric populations younger
`than 6 years to better understand the potential differences
`in CBZ exposure between children younger and older than
`6 years old when CBZ was administered as an IR suspension
`(prepared from crushed Tegretol© tablets) (56). CBZ doses
`of 17 and 19 mg/kg suspension were tested in 20.9 days new-
`born (n = 7; 3.2 kg; 25 mL water) and 5.1-year-old children
`(1.25–8 years; n = 5; 120 mL water), respectively (56). Based
`on the fraction absorbed (66%) from the IR suspension (42),
`the 66% was assumed to be dissolved for an IR suspension to
`run the simulations in younger (< 6 years) pediatric popula-
`tion. This assumption would be a limitation of model simula-
`tions, and any future dissolution work would help to further
`improve the model prediction.
`Due to higher clearance values in younger children (57), a
`clearance value of 3.18 L/h (42) was used to run the model;
`the volume of distribution (Vss) was fitted (by visual obser-
`vation of the superimposed predicted and observed data-
`sets) (2.6 L/kg for 20.9 days new-born and or 2.850 L/kg
`for 5.1 years child) to capture the observed clinical datasets
`published in Rey (1979) study (56).
`
`Virtual Bioequivalence (VBE) Studies
`
`Preliminary exposure simulations were performed using the
`dissolution data generated in Ad-FaSSGF and Ad-FaSSIF
`500 mL media for Tegretol© 100 mg IR tablets and the pre-
`dicted PK profile was validated using literature data (Kohl-
`man study (42); 200 mg IR tablet). Although the dissolution
`data was generated using 100 mg tablet, previous literature
`has reported that the dissolution of these IR tablets is similar
`to the 200 mg product used in the clinical study (54). So, the
`assumption of similar dissolution profiles for both 100 mg
`and 200 mg tablets was used for the simulation purposes.
`VBE simulations were performed in a fully replicated, two
`treatment, multiple trials (N = 10) in a cross-over design with
`a sample size of n = 12,16, 24, 36, and 48 in healthy adults
`(18–45 years) (58). The number trials (N = 10) were fixed as
`per the SimCyp VBE protocol (23, 58). A single dose of CBZ
`IR tablets 100 mg was administered with 240 mL of fluids.
`For VBE simulation, the dissolution profiles for Tegretol©
`100 mg and generic product 100 mg (Medreich) generated
`in Ad-FaSSGF and FaSSIF 500 mL were incorporated into
`the adult PBPK model. The default coefficients of variation
`(%CV) for accounting the inter-subject variability of the
`physiological parameters provided in the SimCyp database
`
`1 3
`
`

`

`
`
` 67 Page 6 of 18
`
`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`for the North European Caucasian healthy adult volunteers
`population were applied for each parameter.
`For pediatrics, VBE simulations were performed with
`a sample size of 12, 16, 24, 36, and 48 healthy subjects
`(6.5–15 years, to match existing published clinical data sets)
`and a single dose of CBZ IR tablets 100 mg administered
`with 120 mL of fluids. Furthermore, the pediatric simulation
`outputs were validated using literature data (Hartley (1991);
`20 mg/kg/day given as 100 or 200 mg tablets twice daily and
`Bano (1986); 9.3 mg/kg per day).
`The input dissolution profile from the full suite of
`in vitro dissolution tests (Ad-FaSSGF and FaSSIF at
`500/200/100/50 mL; Ped-FaSSGF and FaSSIF-14 BS at
`200 mL or Ped-FaSSGF and FaSSIF-50% 14 BS at 200 mL or
`Ped-FaSSGF and FaSSIF-Na TCA at 200 mL) was integrated
`into the PBPK model to identify which profile gave the best
`match to the existing clinical data set from Hartley study (54).
`
`Evaluation of Predictability of the PBPK Model
`
`Results
`
`In Vitro Dissolution Data
`
`The dissolution profiles of CBZ 100 mg tablets obtained using
`the pH-adjusted USP media (30) were compared with those
`obtained using biorelevant adult FaSSGF and FaSSIF media
`with a dissolution volume of 900 mL (Supplementary Figure S2).
`When the dissolution profile from USP dissolution media
`1% SLS (pH 1.2 and 6.5) was compared to Adult FaSSGF/
`FaSSIF profiles, a decrease in % of release for Tegretol©
`100 mg tablets was observed. The major difference in these
`media is the surfactant type and concentration used; a 1%
`SLS media is a high surfactant concentration and perhaps it
`is unsurprising that such raid dissolution is observed com-
`pared to the biorelevant media. The results indicated that the
`pH of the media did not affect the overall dissolution.
`The impact of media volume on dissolution was evalu-
`ated using both Ad-FaSSGF and Ad- FaSSIF media and the
`results are shown in Fig. 1a and b, respectively.
`As expected for a poorly soluble drug like CBZ, reduc-
`ing the volume of dissolution media resulted in decreased
`% drug release from the tablet formulation. However, the
`decrease in % release was not significant according to the
`F1/F2 statistic when the volume was reduced from 900 to
`500 mL and from 100 to 50 mL. For both Ad-FaSSGF and
`Ad-FaSSIF media, the F1/F2 values are shown in Table I.
`The impact of media composition on the dissolution of
` Tegretol© 100 mg tablets was further assessed in a 200 mL
`volume of both simulated pediatric gastric and intestinal
`media to mimic the pediatric GI fluid volume (Fig. 2a and b).
`When 200 mL of media was used, based on F1 and F2
`comparison, dissimilarity was observed between Ad-FaS-
`SIF and Ped-FaSSIF 50% 14BS (Table II). This is likely
`resulting from the large differences in the BS concentra-
`tion (3000 vs 89 μM).
`
`In Vitro Dissolution Comparison Between Generic
`and RLD Product
`
`Adult FaSSGF/FaSSIF (500 mL)
`
`Dissolution of the RLD and generic product was compared
`in simulated adult GI media using a volume of 500 mL. The
`volume of 500 mL is consistent with in vivo studies where it
`is known that by ingesting 250 mL of water with the dosage
`form, plus the residual water in the adult GI tract that a maxi-
`mum total volume of about 300–500 mL will be available in the
`proximal small intestine (1, 63, 64). Based on the F1/F2 criteria,
`the dissolution profiles of the two products were similar in Ad-
`FaSSIF (F1 = 6.5, F2 = 64.2), but not in Ad-FaSSGF (F1 = 21.7,
`F2 = 43.1) (Fig. 3). A similar conclusion was reached when the
`test was repeated in 200 mL simulated pediatric media (Fig. 4).
`
`Prediction error for AUC and Cmax were evaluated by the
`following formula (14, 59, 60):
`|Predicted parameter − Observed parameter|
`
`% Prediction Error =
`
`× 100
`
`Observed parameter
`
`(4)
`In this study, we considered a PE value of < 20% confirm-
`ing the good predictability of the model. In addition, Fold
`error (FE) for AUC and Cmax were evaluated by the follow-
`ing equation (40, 59–61):
`
`Fold Error =
`
`Predicted
`Observed
`
`(5)
`
`Furthermore, the mean predicted plasma concentra-
`tion–time profiles were also assessed by the average fold
`error (AFE) and validated by the absolute average fold error
`(AAFE) (Eqs. 6 and 7 respectively) (40, 61).
`∑
`,log (Predicted)i
`(Observed)i
`
`1 n
`
`AFE = 10
`
`(6)
`
`(Observed)i
`
`∑|||,log (Predicted)i
`|||
`(7)
`AAFE = 10
`where n denotes the number of observed PK sampling
`points, Predictedi is the predicted concentration at time point
`i, Observedi is the observed concentration at time point i.
`The FE indicates the predictive accuracy of each data point
`as shown in equation (62). The AFE indicates whether the
`predicted profile underestimates (AFE < 1) or overestimates
`(AFE > 1) the observed values, as shown in Eq. 6, whereas the
`AAFE quantifies the absolute error from the observed values,
`as shown in Eq. 7. An AAFE value close to unity represents
`the precision of the simulations (62). When comparing the
`simulated data to clinical data, the populations were matched
`in terms of age range and sample size for each study.
`
`1 n
`
`1 3
`
`

`

`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`Fig. 1 Dissolution profiles of
`100 mg CBZ tablets (Tegretol©)
`in Ad-FaSSGF a and Ad-
`FaSSIF b media as a function of
`dissolution media volume. The
`data points show the mean of 6
`values and the error bars show
`the % CV
`
`Page 7 of 18 67
`
`Pediatric FaSSGF/FaSSIF (200 mL)
`
`Comparison of % of release between reference CBZ
` (Tegretol©) and generic (Medreich) 100 mg tablets in Ped-
`FaSSIF media containing 14 BS showed dissolution simi-
`larity between the two products (Fig. 4). At pH 1.2, com-
`parison of both the reference and generic profiles showed
`differences (F1 = 34.8 and F2 = 43.0). It appears that CBZ
`
`generic has higher % release at gastric pH as compared to
`the reference drug.
`
`Validation of Adult and Pediatric PBPK Model
`
`Simulations conducted using the adult PBPK model cap-
`tured the observed plasma time-concentration profiles for
`CBZ given as a single oral dose of 100 mg (41), 200 mg (41,
`
`Table I The F1/F2 Values for the Dissolution Profiles that Use an Alternative Volume of Media. Note that F1 Values ≤ 15 and F2 Values ≥ 50
`Indicate Similarity Between Profiles, Where Similarity Is Shown the Numbers Are Highlighted in Green
`Ad-FaSSGF
`Ad-FaSSIF
`500 mL
`500 mL
`9.1
`12.5
`58.8
`52.9
`
`900 mL
`
`500 mL
`
`200 mL
`
`100 mL
`
`200 mL
`42.4
`25
`36.6
`29.8
`
`100 mL
`79.7
`12.6
`77.7
`15.3
`64.8
`29.6
`
`50 mL
`87.1
`F1
`10.4
`F2
`85.8
`F1
`12.7
`F2
`77.6
`F1
`25.4
`F2
`45.1
`F1
`57.6
`F2
`Ad-FaSSGF adult-fasted state simulated gastric fluid, Ad-FaSSIF adult-fasted state simulated intestinal fluid
`
`200 mL
`45.2
`24.0
`37.3
`30.5
`
`100 mL
`78.6
`12.9
`75.5
`16.7
`61
`32.3
`
`50 mL
`87.7
`10.7
`85.9
`14.0
`77.5
`27.0
`42.4
`59.4
`
`1 3
`
`

`

`
`
` 67 Page 8 of 18
`
`Fig. 2 Comparison of the
`dissolution profiles of 100 mg
`CBZ tablets (Tegretol©) in
`200 mL simulated gastric fluid
`(a) and intestinal fluids (b). The
`data points show the mean of 6
`values and the error bars show
`the % CV
`
`The AAPS Journal (2023) 25:67
`
`42), and 400 mg (as 2 × 200 mg)

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket