throbber
Journal o_f Chromatography, 353 (1986) 309- 318
`Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. , Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands
`
`CHROMSYMP. 742
`
`DETERMINATION OF THE ANTILEUKEMIA AGENTS CYTARABINE
`AND AZACITIDINE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE DEGRADATION PROD(cid:173)
`UCTS BY HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY
`
`LARRY D. KISSINGER* and NICKL. STEMM
`Control Research and Development, The Upjohn Company. Kalamazoo, MI 49001 ( U.S.A .)
`
`SUMMARY
`
`A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system
`was developed for the determination of the antineoplastic agents cytarabine and
`azacitidine. Separations were performed on an octadecylsilane column with a mobile
`phase of methanol-phosphate buffer pH 7.0 (5:95). The assay methods are suitable
`for bulk drugs and sterile powder formulations of the agents. Specificity in the pres(cid:173)
`ence of analogues and decomposition products was demonstrated. UV spectra of the
`components of interest were obtained in the HPLC effluent, and appropriate wave(cid:173)
`lengths were employed for the various analytes. Samples of azacitidine in various
`solutions were analyzed as a function of time by HPLC to determine the three
`first-order rate constants associated with its decomposition.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Cytarabine (Ara-C; cytosine arabinoside; 1-P-o-arabinofuranosyl cytosine)
`and azaci ti dine ( 5-AC; 5-azacytidine; 4-amino- l-/J-o-ribofuranosyl-s-triazin-2( 1 H)(cid:173)
`one) are nucleoside analogues which have antitumor activity. Cytarabine is formu(cid:173)
`lated as a freeze-dried powder and is marketed for induction and maintenance of
`remission in acute mye1ocytic leukemia (Cytosar-U®, The Upjohn Company). A new
`drug application was made in the U.S.A. for a freeze-dried powder containing equal
`amounts of 5-AC and mannitol (Mylosar®, The Upjohn Company) for induction of
`remission in acute non-lymphocytic leukemia.
`This report describes a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromato(cid:173)
`graphic (HPLC) method for quantitative determination of these antineoplastic agents
`in bulk drugs and pharmaceutical formulations. The sample preparations and chro(cid:173)
`matographic conditions are simple and rapid. The determinations are specific for
`these agents in the presence of analogues and products of hydrolytic decomposition.
`Although Ara-C and 5-AC are stable in the solid state, they are degraded by
`hydrolysis in aqueous solutions. Hydrolytic deamination of Ara-C (I) results in the
`elimination of ammonia and the formation of uracil arabinoside (II), as shown in
`Fig. 11 •2 . In common infusion solutions of Ara-C, degradation is less than 1 % in five
`days 3 • In neutral and basic solution, the hydrolysis of 5-AC (III) occurs via nucleo-
`CELGENE 2019
`APOTEX v. CELGENE
`IPR2023-00512
`
`© 1986 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
`
`0021-9673/86/$03 .50
`
`

`

`310
`
`.;; ~N)
`
`HOCa•o
`H HO
`H
`H
`OH H
`
`L. D. KISSINGER, N. L. STEMM
`
`-
`
`--½
`
`O~N)J
`2
`
`HOC~O ·
`H H
`H
`
`
`
`H
`
`OH H
`II
`Fig. I. Hydrolytic deamination of cytarabine (I) to uracil arabinoside (II).
`
`philic attack, opening the triazine ring at the 5,6-position to form N-(formylamini(cid:173)
`ne)-N'-P-o-ribofuranosylurea (IV), as shown in Fig. 24 • 5 . The N-formyl group of IV
`is eliminated to form 1-P-o-ribofuranosyl-3-guanylurea (V). In strongly acidic solu(cid:173)
`tions, the glycoside bond is hydrolyzed to produce 5-azacytosine and o-ribose. Hy(cid:173)
`drolysis of 5-AC in infusion solutions is much more rapid than that of cytarabine.
`Over 10% of 5-AC is degraded in common infusion solutions within 4 h 6
`• The ki(cid:173)
`netics of 5-AC decomposition have been studied previously by UV spectroscopy4,
`HPLC6 , and NMR spectroscopy 7 .
`
`NH2
`
`NH,
`
`NH2
`
`HNAN
`
`Hto Ao
`
`HOCH 2 HN
`
`H2N~N
`
`Ao
`
`N~N
`
`l..NAo
`HOQ
`
`HO OH
`
`Ill
`
`k12
`
`k,, o~
`HOQ
`
`HO OH
`
`HO OH
`
`IV
`
`V
`
`Fig. 2. Stepwise hydrolysis of azacitidine (III) to N-(formylaminine)-N'-2P-ribofuranosylurea (IV), then
`I -{1-o-ribofuranosyl-3-guanylurea (V).
`
`EXPERIMENT AL
`
`Chromatographic system
`The mobile phase was delivered by an Altex Model ll0A pump (Altex Scien(cid:173)
`tific, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A.). Sample injection was performed with a WISP 710B
`autosampler (Waters Assoc., Milford, MA, U.S.A.) or a manual Model 7010 loop
`injector (Rheodyne, Cotati, CA, U.S.A.). Detection was generally performed at 254
`nm with a LDC Model 1203 detector (Laboratory Data Control, Riviera Beach, FL,
`U.S.A.). A Tracor (Austin, TX, U .S.A.) Model 970A variable-wavelength detector
`was also employed. Some full UV chromatograms were obtained with HP Model
`1040A diode-array detector (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.). Separations
`were performed on a 30 cm x 3.9 mm I.D. µBondapak C 18 column (Waters Assoc).
`The mobile phase, water-methanol (95:5) containing 1.34 g disodium hydrogen phos(cid:173)
`phate heptahydrate, 0. 71 g sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate per liter, was
`pumped at a rate of 1 ml/min. The apparent pH of the mobile phase was 7.0.
`
`

`

`HPLC OF CYTARABINE AND AZACTTJDINE
`
`311
`
`Reagents
`Methanol was distilled-in-glass grade (Burdick & Jackson, Muskegon, MI,
`U.S.A.). Disodium hydrogen phosphate heptahydrate and sodium dihydrogen phos(cid:173)
`phate monohydrate were analytical-reagent grade. The p-toluic acid was obtained
`from Crescent Chemical (Hauppauge, NY, U.S.A.). Cytosine, D-( - )-ribose, and D(cid:173)
`( - )-arabinose were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). A sample of 5-
`azacytosine was provided by Ash-Stevens (Detroit, MI, U.S.A.).
`
`Cytarabine preparations and procedure
`Internal standard solution. A 1.4-mg/ml solution of p-toluic acid was prepared
`in methanol.
`Standard preparation. A 0.02-mg/ml solution of uracil arabinoside in water
`was prepared. Approximately 3 mg of Ara-C was accurately weighed and 5.0 ml of
`the uracil arabinoside solution, 5.0 ml of internal standard solution, and 20 ml of
`mobile phase were added.
`Bulk drug preparation. Cytarabine (3 mg) was accurately weighed and 5.0 ml
`of internal standard solution and 25 ml of mobile phase were added.
`CYTOSAR- U® sterile powder preparation. The contents of the vial were quan(cid:173)
`titatively diluted with water to prepare a 1-mg/ml solution of Ara-C. A 3.0-ml portion
`of this Ara-C solution was combined with 5.0 ml of internal standard solution and
`20 ml of mobile phase.
`Procedure. Portions of 10 µ1 of the preparations were injected. The cytarabine
`and uracil arabinoside content of the samples were calculated by comparing the ratio
`of the peak response relative to the internal standard to the ratio of the standards.
`
`Azacitidine preparations and procedure
`Internal standard solution. A 2-mg/ml solution of p-toluic acid was prepared
`in water-methanol (20:80).
`Standard and bulk drug preparations. A 1-mg/ml solution of 5-AC was prepared
`in internal standard solution.
`MYLOSAR® sterile powder preparation. The contents of the vial were quan(cid:173)
`titatively diluted with internal standard solution to prepare a 1-mg/ml solution of
`5-AC.
`Procedure. Exactly 15 min after addition of the internal standard solution to
`the 5-AC, a 2-µl portion of the preparation was chromatographed. The 5-AC content
`of the sample was calculated by comparing the ratio of the peak responses to the
`internal standard to the ratio of the standards.
`
`Azacitidine decomposition
`Decomposition of 5-AC in several solutions was monitored by performing
`from 50-120 HPLC assays as a function of time. Large•volume parenteral (L VP)
`solutions in 1-1 glass bottles and plastic bags were obtained from Travenol Labs.
`(Deerfield, IL, U.S.A.) and Abbott Labs. (Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). The pH of the so(cid:173)
`lutions was adiusted to the desired value with hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide.
`Solution admmistration sets with particulate filters were obtained from Travenol
`Labs. Direct injection with a 50-µl injection loop and no internal standard was used
`to analyze the dilute solutions. The time range monitored was two to three days,
`except for at 4°C, where the samp]e was monitored for 3 weeks.
`
`

`

`312
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`L. D. KISSINGER, N. L. STEMM
`
`Since Ara-C and 5-AC are polar molecules, reversed-phase HPLC must be
`performed with a mobile phase containing a low concentration of organic modifier.
`Although 5-AC has been assayed by reverse-phase HPLC without any organic mod(cid:173)
`ifier in the mobile phase 5 , the addition of 5% methanol to the aqueous mobile phase
`improved the reproducibility of retention times.
`Tailing of some of the peaks, e.g. of 5-AC, was observed with unbuffered and
`acidic mobile phases. The irreversible adsorption which resulted in peak tailing is
`assumed to be the result of bonding of the primary amines of the analytes with
`residual silanol group on the surface of the stationary phase. The neutral pH of the
`phosphate buffer in the mobile phase was an effective compromise to assure sym(cid:173)
`metrical peaks and resonable column life. Retention times of the analytes varied from
`column to column and slowly decreased with time. Relative retention behavior of the
`components of interest were reproducible on all columns. With this mobile phase, a
`small, approximately 2 mm, void would form at the head of the column and result
`in reduced chromatographic efficiency. To maintain acceptable chromatographic per(cid:173)
`formance, it was necessary to repack the head of the column after ca. 40 h of opera(cid:173)
`tion. The mobile phase was not bacteriostatic, and the column would be ruined if
`stored with the mobile phase for extended time periods.
`
`Chromatographic specficity
`Selectivity of the chromatographic system is demonstrated for Ara-C, 5-AC,
`
`D
`
`254nm
`
`E
`
`200nm
`
`2 mAU
`
`A
`
`C
`
`8
`
`F
`
`0
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`Time (min)
`Fig. 3. Chromatograms recorded at 200 and 254 nm for cytarabine, azacitidine, and their analogues.
`Peaks: A = 0.45 µg V; B = 0.20 µg cyclocytidine; C = 0.90 µg IV; D = 2.6 µg azacitidine; E = 2.0 Jig
`cytarabine; F = 0.20 µg uracil arabinoside. See Figs. 1 and 2 for full names and structures.
`
`

`

`HPLC OF CYT A RABINE AND AZACITIDINE
`
`313
`
`and their analogues in Fig. 3. A pro-drug, cyclocytidine, which is hydrolyzed to form
`Ara-C 8 , is separated from Ara-C and uracil arabinoside. Cleavage of the glycosidic
`bond in Ara-C and 5-AC would result in the formation of o~arabinose and o-ribose,
`respectively. These sugars elute at the column void volume. The bases which result
`from cleavage of the glycosidic bond elute earlier than the corresponding nucleoside
`analogues, with retention times of 4.1 and 3.6 min for cytosine and 5-azacytosine,
`respectively. None of the analogues or products of decomposition interfered with the
`peaks for Ara-C or 5-AC.
`A chromatogram of the analysis of a Cytosar-U sterile powder sample is shown
`in Fig. 4. Although Ara-Chas an absorbance maximum at wavelengths higher than
`254 nm, the common HPLC detection wavelength of 254 nm was employed. The
`additional sensitivity which could be obtained at the wavelength of maximum ab(cid:173)
`sorbance was not necessary for pharmaceutical samples. Extrapolation from elevated
`temperatures yields a decomposition rate constant at 25°C of 2.2 - 10- 5 h - i (ref. 9).
`Thus, only 0.05% of the Ara-C will be degraded in the sample preparation in one
`day. A small amount of uracil arabinoside is expected to form in the product during
`the freeze-drying process. A small peak for uracil arabinoside is present in the chro(cid:173)
`matogram of Cytosar-U sterile powder that corresponds to 0.05% of the Ara-C
`content.
`Chromatograms at 230 and 254 nm are shown in Fig. 5 for a sample prepared
`from Mylosar sterile powder. No detector response is observed for mannitol, which
`is present at an amount equal to the 5-AC in Mylosar, because it does not absorb
`UV radiation at these wavelengths. Small amounts of the primary decomposition
`
`A
`
`B
`
`254nm
`
`i
`50mAU l
`
`D 254nm
`
`C
`
`50mAU
`
`l
`l
`
`B
`
`~ l )~
`
`0
`
`10
`
`0
`
`10
`
`Time (min)
`Time (min)
`Fig. 4. Chromatogram recorded at 254 nm of a 100-mg Cytosar-U sterile powder sample. Peaks: A =
`cytarabine; B = p-toluic acid.
`Fig. 5. Chromatograms recorded at 230 and 254 nm of a 100-mg Mylosar sterile powder sample. Peaks:
`A = V; B = IV; C = azacitidine; D = p-toluic acid.
`
`

`

`314
`
`L. D. KISSINGER, N . L. STEMM
`
`product (IV, Fig. 2) and the secondary decomposition product (V, Fig. 2) can be
`detected in the Mylosar sample. The decomposition products of 5-AC are formed
`during the freeze-drying process and in the sample preparation, prior to injection.
`The peak for the primary decomposition product corresponds to 2.1 % of the 5-AC
`content, of which 1.7% is present in the freeze-dried cake and 0.4% formed in the
`sample preparation. To minimize decomposition of 5-AC in the sample and standard
`preparations, methanol- water (80:20) is used as a solvent for dilution of the prepa(cid:173)
`rations. Hydrolysis rates in the aqueous alcohol are much slower than in purely
`aqueous solution. The preparations are injected 15 min after addition of the alcoholic
`internal standard solution to reproduce the extent of decomposition. Use of the lower
`wavelength (230 nm) was necessary to obtain a response for the secondary decom(cid:173)
`position product.
`
`UV spectra
`UV spectra obtained with the diode-array detector for Ara-C, 5~AC, and their
`analogues are shown in Fig. 6. The spectra were obtained as the analytes eluted from
`the chromatograph. In the neutral pH of the mobile phase,,Ara-C absorbs light from
`200 through 300 nm with a small maximum at about 275 nm. Cytosine, the base
`portion of Ara-C, has an absorbance spectra that closely parallels Ara-C. The sugar
`
`90%
`(mAU)
`
`(a )
`
`0
`
`- 10L.....L---L......L....L--'--L.....1.---L......L..,-J---'--L.....1.---L......L....L-......... L.....L~,....._ ......... .L-'
`200
`250
`300
`
`90%
`(mAU)
`
`Wavelength (nm)
`
`(b)
`
`0
`-10'--'___.___._.......__.__..._..___.___._.......__.__ .......... ___.__._...__.__ ........... _,,....._._...__
`200
`250
`300
`
`Wavelength (nm}
`Fig. 6. Spectra of (a) cytarabine and analogues, and (b) azacitidine and analogues. (a)--, D-arabinose
`(Amax = 200 nm, max. abs. = 30 mAU); ---, cytosine (A.max = 200 nm, max. abs. = 137 mAU); ---;
`cytarabine (Amax = 200 nm, max. abs. = 314 mAU); - • - •-, uracil arabinoside (Amax = 262 nm, max.
`- , V (,l,mu = 200 run, max. abs. = 115 mAU); ----, 5-azacytosine (Amax = 200
`abs. = 12 mAU). (b) -
`nm, max. abs. = 321 mAU); ----, IV (Amax = 242 nm, max. abs. = 216 mAU); - . - . - . -, azacitidine
`0-max = 202 nm, max. abs. = 506 mAU).
`
`

`

`HPLC OF CYTARABINE AND AZACITIDINE
`
`315
`
`portion of the molecule, o-( - )-arabinose, only shows a weak end absorbance above
`200 nm. The primary decomposition product of Ara-C, uracil arabinoside, has a
`broad peak with a maximum at 270 nm. Except for the sugar, the common 254 nm
`HPLC detectors provide good sensitivity for the analysis of these components.
`The UV spectra of 5-AC and 5-azacytosine have broad bands, which are sim(cid:173)
`ilar to those of Ara-C and cytosine. The primary decomposition product of 5-AC
`has a maximum at ca. 254 nm. Maximal absorptivity for the second decomposition
`product of 5-AC (V) is at lower wavelengths, and sensitivity for it can be increased
`by changing from the normal analytical wavelength of 254 nm to 230 run. Ribose,
`the sugar portion of the 5-AC molecule, and mannitol, the sugar which is present in
`an amount equal to the 5-AC in the Mylosar formulation, are analogous to o-( - )(cid:173)
`arabinose in that they contain no significant ultraviolet chromophore.
`
`Linearity and precision
`Linearity of response was investigated by injecting nine samples of Ara-C,
`ranging from 0.3 to 1.5 µg. These amounts correspond to 30-150% of the amount
`specified in the assay procedure. Linear regression analysis of the aµiount determined
`by peak height and peak area versus the amount added resulted in slopes of 1.006
`and 1.012, respectively, and intercepts which were less than the assay variation. Cor(cid:173)
`relation coefficients (r) for these lines were greater than 0.9999. An Ara-C sample
`was assayed a total of eight times on six different days with a relative standard
`deviation (R.S.D.) of 1.1 and 0.9% by peak height and peak area, respectively.
`Nineteen spiked sample preparations of Ara-C were prepared with 0-15% of
`its decomposition product, uracil arabinoside. Regression analysis of the uracil ar(cid:173)
`abinoside amount determined by peak height versus the amount added resulted in a
`slope of 0.975 with r > 0.99. The amounts of uracil arabinoside determined in the
`presence of large amounts of Ara-Care slightly below theory (2.5%), because of the
`limited resolution from the major component. Peak-area quantitation tended to be
`less accurate than peak-height quantitation of uracil arabinoside on the tailing side
`of the Ara-C peak. A total of eight assays on six different days were performed on
`a sample that contained 0.5% uracil arabinoside with a resulting R.S.D. of 3.7% by
`peak height.
`Linearity for 5-AC was established by injecting seven samples ranging from
`0.8 to 2.8 µg. These amounts correspond to 40-140% of amount specified in the
`assay procedure. Peak-height and peak-area responses were linear over this range
`with r > 0.999 and intercepts which were less than the assay variation. Precision of
`the procedure has been established by a relative standard deviation of 1.0% for
`twenty determinations performed on a solid sample over a period of a year.
`
`Azacitidine decomposition kinetics
`The kinetics of the two-step decomposition route of 5-AC can be fit to the
`following equation: [III] = Ae - a1 + Be-Pt (refs. 7 and 9). Iterative best-fit calcula(cid:173)
`tions were performed on [III] versus time (t) profiles to determine the coefficients (A,
`B) and exponential terms (a, (3). From the terms of the biexponential equation, the
`respective first-order kinetic rate constants were calculated10.
`The values for the three first-order rate constants associated with the decom(cid:173)
`position of 5-AC are listed in Tables I and II. Kinetic rate constants were not sig-
`
`

`

`316
`
`L. D. KISSINGER, N. L. STEMM
`
`TABLE I
`FIRST-ORDER DECOMPOSITION RATE CONSTANTS FOR 0.1 mg/ml AZACITIDINE SOLU(cid:173)
`TIONS
`
`Solvent
`
`Temperature
`(° C)
`
`Water
`Water
`Phosphate (0.0067 M)
`Phosphate (0.067 M)
`Phosphate (0.2 M)
`
`25
`30
`30
`30
`30
`
`k11
`(min- 1 )
`
`0.000692
`0.00120
`0.00135
`0.00214
`0.00562
`
`k12
`(min- 1 )
`
`0.00180
`0.00312
`0.00333
`0.00558
`0.0139
`
`k13
`(min- 1 )
`
`0.000336
`0.000542
`0.000842
`0.00185
`0.00366
`
`nificantly different for solutions made from the b"ulk drug and Mylosar formulation,
`indicating that the small amount of mannitol does not affect the solution stability of
`5-AC.
`An example of the profiles of 5-AC and its two decomposition products as a
`function of time in a lactated Ringer's injection solution USP is shown in Fig. 7.
`These profiles were calculated from the values of the biexponential equation which
`was fit to the experimental data for 5-AC. Within the 1 % R.S.D. of the HPLC assay,
`values for 5-AC which were calculated in an iterative fashion from the first-order
`kinetic rate constants equaled the experimental values.
`The thermal dependence of the three first-order rate constants fit the Arrhenius
`
`TABLE II
`FIRST-ORDER DECOMPOSITION RATE CONSTANTS FOR AZACITIDINE (0.1 mg/ml) IN VARIOUS
`THERAPEUTIC SOLUTIONS OF MYLOSAR
`Solvents: water = purified water USP; BWFI = bacteriostatic water for injection; LRI = lactated Ringer's injection
`USP; dextrose = 5% dextrose injection USP; saline = 0.9% sodium chloride injection USP. Suppliers of solvents:
`A = laboratory purified water USP; B = The Upjohn Company, C = Travenol Labs., D = Abbott Labs.
`
`Solvent
`
`Solvent
`supplier
`
`pH
`
`Temperature Container
`r·cJ
`type
`
`k11
`(min - 1 )
`
`k12
`(min- 1 )
`
`k13
`( min- 1)
`
`IV
`set
`
`Water
`A
`Water
`A
`BWFI
`B
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`C
`LRI
`D
`LRI
`C
`Dextrose D
`Dextrose C
`Saline
`C
`Saline
`C
`Saline
`D
`
`7.0
`7.0
`5.7
`7.0
`6.0
`6.5
`7.0
`7.0
`7.0
`7.0
`7.5
`4.0
`6.0
`4.5
`4.5
`5.8
`
`30
`40
`25
`4
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`25
`
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass
`Glass
`Plastic
`Plastic
`Plastic
`Glass
`Plastic
`Glass
`Glass
`Plastic
`Plastic
`
`0.00121
`0.00343
`0.000526
`0.0000619
`0.00149
`0.00100
`0.000878
`0.000769
`0.000897
`0.000730
`0.000991
`0.00304
`0.000608
`0.00296
`0.00296
`0.00172
`
`0.00334
`0.00938
`0.00170
`0. 000 13 6
`0.00413
`0.00258
`0.002501
`· 0.00178
`0.00224
`0.00181
`0.00268
`0.00829
`0.00115
`0.0106
`0.00810
`0.00451
`
`0.000498
`0.00157
`0.000385
`0.0000158
`0.000355
`0.000341
`0.000462
`0.000348
`0.000370
`0.000354
`0.000428
`0.00131
`0.00147
`0.00168
`0.000436
`0.00332
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`Yes
`
`

`

`HPLC OF CYTARABINE AND AZACITIDINE
`
`317
`
`120
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`'-.... ------
`"
`
`20
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------
`
`0 o
`
`1000
`
`2000
`
`Minutes
`
`3000
`
`4000
`
`Fig. 7. Calculated profiles for azacitidine and its decomposition products in a solution of Lactated Ringer's
`injection USP, pH 6.5, 25°C.
`
`equation for neutral solutions (pH 7) over the temperature range of 4-40°C. The
`calculated activation energies for k 11 , k 12 , and k 13 were 8.33, 8.76, and 9.58 kcal/mol,
`respectively. For pharmaceutical preparations of 5-AC, the stability is greatly en(cid:173)
`hanced by reducing the temperature. After IO h, ca. 20% decomposition occurs at
`25°C, while ca. 4% decomposition occurs at 4°C.
`The rate constants in Table I show the decrease in stability of 5-AC with
`increasing ionic strength of pH 7 phosphate buffered solutions. The negative effect
`of ionic strength on the stability of 5-AC has been observed by other researchers4 .
`Infusion solutions of low ionic strength provide optimal stability for administration
`of Mylosar®. Of the pharmaceutical solutions, degradation of 5-AC is slowest in the
`bacteriostatic water for injection USP solution. Electrolytes in each of the L VP sol(cid:173)
`vents have a destabilizing effect on the 5-AC. Because of the lower pH of the saline
`a· i dextrose solutions, the decomposition of the drug is much more rapid than the
`nearly neutral lactated Ringer's injection USP solution. Even within the specified
`range of 6.0- 7.5 for the pH of lactated Ringer's injection USP, differences in the
`decomposition rates are detectable. The maxiµmm for stability in this infusion so(cid:173)
`lution is obtained at pH 7.0. Use of an intravenous (i.v.)-solution-administration set
`with particulate filter did not affect the decomposition kinetics.
`Without isolating the decomposition products of 5-AC, IV and V, their re(cid:173)
`sponse factors can be calculated from the observed responses and the kinetic factors.
`Responses for the decomposition products in solution are a result of the initial level
`of the component and the amount formed as a function of time. After subtracting
`the initial response, the response factor can be calculated from the amount predicted
`from the kinetic factors. Reproducible values for the response factors were observed
`for the time window from 700 to 4200 min. Response factors calculated from early
`time points were not reproducible because only a small amount of the decomposition
`products had formed. For data from three different solutions using the 254-nm mer(cid:173)
`cury line source detector, an average response factor for IV versus 5-AC on a mass
`basis was 2.14, with an R.S.D. of 3%. For data from three different solutions using
`a variable-wavelength detector set at 254 nm, the factor was 2.20, with an R.S.D. of
`
`

`

`318
`
`L. D. KISSINGER, N. L. STEMM
`
`15%. Better precision for the relative response factor is expected with the line source
`detector, because of the reproducibility of the source wavelength. With the photo(cid:173)
`diode-array detector, a relative response factor for V versus 5-AC on a mass basis at
`230 nm was found to be 0.56, with an R.S.D. of 7%.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1 R. E. Notari, J. Pharm. Sci., 56 (1967) 804-809.
`2 R. E. Notari, M. L. Chin and A. Cardoni, J. Pharm. Sci., 59 (1970) 28-32.
`3 Y. Cheung, B. R. Vishnuvajjala and K. P. Flora, Am. J. Hos. Pharm., 41 (1984) 1802-1806.
`4 R. E. Notari and J. L. DeYoung, J. Pharm. Sci., 64 (1975) 1148-1157.
`5 J. A. Beisler, J. Med. Chem., 21 (1978) 204-208.
`6 Y. Cheung, B. R. Vishnuvajjala, N. L. Morris and K. L. Flora, Am. J. Hos. Pharm., 41 (1984)
`1156-1159.
`7 K. K. Chan, D. D. Giannini, J. A. Staroscik and W. Sadee, J. Pharm. Sci., 68 (1979) 807-812.
`8 L. E. Kirsch and R. E. Notari, J. Pharm. Sci. , 73 (1984) 896--902.
`9 R. E. Notari, M . L. 'Chin and R . Wittebort, J. Pharm. Sci., 61 (1972) 1189-1196.
`IO M. Gibaldi and D. Perrier, Pharmacokinetics, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1975, p. 88.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket