throbber
Drug
`
`
`
`
`For reprint orders, please contact reprints@future -drugs.com
`
`Natalizumab: o4-integrin
`antagonist selective adhesion
`molecule inhibitors for MS
`Richard A Rudick! and Alfred Sandrock
`
`Natalizumab (Antegren™, Elan Corp.plc.; Biogen Idec.)is thefirst @4-integrin antagonist in
`the class of selective adhesion molecule inhibitors and is in PhaseIII clinical trials for the
`
` Profile
`
`treatment of multiple sclerosis. After a 300 mg intravenousinfusion, natalizumab has an
`elimination half-life of 6 to 9 days, but a4-integrin receptors expressed on the surface of
`peripheral blood leukocytes are more than 80% saturated approximately 1 month
`postinfusion. Therefore, natalizumab is given as a 300 mg dose administered monthly.
`Preliminary efficacy results showed a marked reduction (~90%)in the formation of new
`gadolinium-enhancing lesions and reduced the numberof patients with relapse by 50% in
`patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis receiving
`natalizumab versus those receiving placebo over a 6-month period. In clinical studies,
`natalizumab has demonstrated a favorable safety profile. Pivotal PhaseIII studies of
`natalizumab as monotherapy and in combination with intramuscularinterteron-B-1a are
`underway in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Natalizumab may be an
`important addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for multiple sclerosis.
`
`Expert Rev. Neurotherapeutics 4(4\, 571-580 (2004)
`
`Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease of
`the CNS which causes various
`symptoms
`including
`sensory
`disturbances,
`unilateral
`optic neuritis, diplopia, limb weakness, clum-
`siness and gait ataxia [1]. Eventually, more trou-
`such
`as
`blesome
`complications
`cognitive
`dysphagia,
`impairment,
`spasticity,
`vertigo,
`pain, sensory lass and sexual dysfunction may
`also appear. The pathological hallmark of MS
`is multiple foci of inflammation accompanied
`by demyelination and varying degrees of
`axonal transection. The presence of gadolin-
`ium-enhancing (Gd+} lesions on magnetic res-
`onance imaging (MRI) indicates current sites
`of presumed inflammatory demyelination [1].
`Goals of pharmacotherapy in MS include
`symptom relief during acute relapses, and the
`prevention of future relapses and disease pro-
`gression. Since a
`first clinical demyelinating
`event is associated with the developmentofclin-
`ically definite MS when MS-like lesions are
`present on brain MERI scans [2], early interven-
`tion is important and should be considered at
`the time of the first neurological event, especially
`
`© Future Drugs Ltd. All rights reserved. ISSN 1473-7175
`
`in patients with an unfavorable prognosis [3].
`Corticosteroids are standard therapy for
`the
`treatment of acute relapses due to their immu-
`nomodulatory and anti-inflammiatory effects.
`They shorten the duration of the relapse and
`allow for faster recovery [3]. In the Optic Neuri-
`tis Treatment ‘Trial, treatment with intravenous
`methylprednisolone
`(Medrone®, Pfizer
`Inc.)
`1000 mg/day for 3 days followed by 1 mg/kg of
`oral prednisone for 11 days was associated with a
`significantly faster recovery compared with oral
`prednisone alone or placebo for 14 days [4,5].
`After 2 years of follow-up, patients treated with
`intravenous methylprednisolone demonstrated a
`decreased risk of subsequent attacks compared
`with patients treated with prednisone alone [6].
`However, it is unknown whether corticosteroids
`affect the long-term course of the disease [3].
`Disease-modifying agents
`(DMAs)
`include
`interferon
`(NF)-B-la
`(Avonex™,
`Biogen;
`Rebif®, Serono), IFIN-B-1b (Betaseron®, Scher-
`ing-Plough), glatiramer acetate (Copaxone®,
`Teva Pharmaceutical
`Industries) and mitox-
`antrone (Novantrone®, Lederle), These agents
`
`MERCK2020
`HOPEWELL v MERCK
`IPR2023-00481
`
`571
`
`MERCK 2020
`HOPEWELL v MERCK
`IPR2023-00481
`
`

`

`Rudick & Sandrock
`
`act to prevent or slow the primary events of MS [1,3], with varied
`effects on exacerbation rates, progression of disability, and
`inflammation in the brain as seen on brain MRIscans [7]. In the
`USA and Europe, IFN-B is used as first-line standard clinical
`therapy for relapsing—-remitting MS, galatiramer acetate is also
`used, although not always as first-line therapy [1,8]. These agents
`have been shown to reduce the development of new Gd+lesions
`on MRI and reduce the frequency of new relapses, and IFN-B
`has been shown to decrease the progression of disability [9-14].
`Additional treatment options include immunoglobulin,azathi-
`oprine (Imurek®, GlaxoSmithKline), methotrexate, cyclosporin
`and
`cyclophosphamide
`(Endoxana®,
`Baxter Oncology),
`although none of these agents have received marketing approval
`for the treatment of MS from regulatory agencies. These drugs
`are generally considered for patients with relapsing—remitting
`disease who have not responded to IFN-B or glatirarner acetate
`therapy [3]. Many compoundsare in development for MStreat-
`ment, including natalizumab (Antegren™, Elan Corp. ple. Bio-
`gen Idec.; @4-integrin antibody), alemtuzumab (MabCampath®,
`Schering-Plough; antileukocyte antibody), statins (currently used
`in lipid lowering) and extraneous estrogen [15].
`There is little evidence on which to base treatment deci-
`sions for patients with continued MSdisease activity despite
`the use of currently available DMAs. Although new therapies
`have been introduced in the last 10 years, additional effective
`treatments are needed to slow disease progression, reduce dis-
`ability, and limit
`lesion evolution and irreversible tissue
`destruction [16].
`
`Introduction to natalizumab
`
`Adhesion molecules are involved in the inflammatory demyeli-
`nation process in the CNS. Adhesion molecules and ligands
`expressed on endothelial cells and leukocytes (under the control
`of proinflammatory cytokines) mediate the entry of activated
`T- and B-lymphocytes and monocytes into the CNS [iz]. The
`glycoprotein o4B, integrin (also known as very late antigen 4) is
`one such adhesion molecule and is expressed on lymphocytes,
`monocytes, mast cells, macrophages, basophils and eosinophils
`but not neutrophils [16]. The expression of 4B, integrin has
`been shown to be increased after T-cell activation [18]. The
`expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, the
`major ligand for 048,
`integrin,
`is increased in active CNS
`plaques [18].
`Natalizumab is a recombinant humanized o4-integrin anti-
`body derived from a murine monoclonal antibody (mAb) to
`human o¢gB, integrin [19]. The murine mAb was humanized by
`complimentarity determining region grafting of the hypervaria-
`ble region of the gene encoding the murine antibody onto a
`human immunoglobulin G4 framework (FIGURE 1)
`[19]. Natali-
`zumab is the first &4-integrin antagonist in the class of selective
`adhesion molecule (SAM) inhibitors.
`Natalizumab binds to Cty-integrin on the surface of activated
`T-cells and other mononuclear leukocytes, preventing cellular
`adhesion between the T-cell and the endothelial cell. The disrup-
`tion of cell adhesion molecule interactions
`results
`in the
`
`the
`leukocyte migration across
`prevention of mononuclear
`endothelium and into the parenchyma, with a subsequent reduc-
`tion in proinflammatory cytokines [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. A
`further mechanism of natalizumab may be the suppression of
`ongoing inflammatory reactions in diseased tissues by inhibiting
`the binding of G@y-positive leukocytes with osteopontin and
`fibronectin. There are three potential modesof action:
`* Blockade of migration by blocking adhesion to endothelial
`cells and interaction with extracellular matric proteins
`(eg., fibronectin)
`* Blockade of priming by interaction with osteapontin and
`VCAM expressed on microglial cells and monocytes #7 stfu
`* Induction of apoptosis by blocking interaction of ot4-inte-
`gren bearing leukocytes with extracellualr matrix proteins
`(eg., fibronectin)
`Thus, natalizumab may have dual anti-inflammatoryeffects:
`inhibition of recruitment of immunecells into inflamed tissue
`
`and suppression of existing inflammatory activity at the disease
`site. Since natalizumab inhibits the migration of leukocytes
`into gut tissue [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE], it is also being inves-
`tigated in inflammatory gastrointestinal conditions such as
`Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis [20-22].
`
`Pharmacokinetic & pharmacodynamic profile
`Natalizumab consists of recombinant humanized ot4-integrin
`antibody and excipient materials (ie, sodium chloride, sodium
`dibasic phosphate heptahydrate, sodium monobasic phosphate
`monohydrate and polysorbate 80), The current formulation of
`natalizumab is provided in a buffered solution at a concentra-
`tion of 20 mg/ml. The product is stable for 30 months when
`stored at 28°C [BIOGEN IDEC, DATAON FILE).
`
`Pharmacokinetics
`
`The pharmacokinetics of natalizumab were evaluated in a PhaseI,
`randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial
`involving
`28 patients 19 to 55 years of age with stable relapsing—remitting
`or secondary progressive MS [19]. Patients were randomized to
`
`
`
`ff CDRs .
`
`¢ CDR grafted from Ab
`¢ Human IgG4 framework
`« Retains full potency
`
`Human IgG4
`framework
`
`Figure 1. Protein structure of natalizumab.
`Ab: Antibody; CDRs: Complementary-determining regions;
`lg: Immunoglobulin.
`
`572
`
`Expert Rev. Neurotherapeutics 4(4) , (2004)
`
`

`

`natalizumab 0.03 mg/kg (n = 3), 0.1 mg/kg (n = 3}, 0.3 mg/kg
`(n= 3),
`1 mg/kg (n = 6), 3mg/kg (n = 5) or placebo (n
`= 7).
`Maximum serum concentrations and area under the curve (AUC)
`values for natalizumab were generally proportional to the admin-
`istered dose, although there was sore indication of greater than
`proportional increases at the higher doses. At the lowest dose lev-
`els (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg), serum natalizumab concentrations rap-
`idly fell below detectable levels after the completion of the infu-
`sion. In contrast, patients receiving natalizumab | and 3 mg/kg
`had detectable concentrations for 3 to 8 weeks. At the 3 mg/kg
`dose, mean maximal drug concentrations (C
`tnax)
`of 52.5 jig/ml
`were observed approximately 2h after the dose. The drug con-
`centration time curve was biphasic with a rapid distribution phase
`followed by a prolonged terminal phase. The elimination half-life
`of the 3 mg/kg dose was 4 to 5 days (108.0 + 30.1 h) ig). The
`pharmacokinetic parameters for the six patients receiving the
`highest natalizumab dose level are surmmarized in TABLE 1.
`Similar results were obtained in another Phase I trial evaluat-
`ing single doses of natalizumab 1, 3 and 6 mg/kg or placebo in
`39 patients with relapsing—remitting or secondary progressive
`MS [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE). Natalizumab concentrations
`increased proportionally with the administered dose. Mean
`©ax concentrations were 22, 71 and 152 ig/ml for the 1, 3
`and 6 mg/kg doses, respectively.
`In a Phase II trial, 72 patients with relapsing—rernitting or
`secondary progressive MS received two intravenous infusions of
`natalizumab 3 mg/kg or placebo 28 days apart [17, BIOGEN IDEC,
`DATA ON FILE]. There were no significant differences between the
`first and second doses with respect to pharmacokinetic pararne-
`ters, indicating no significant accumulation of the drug. Simi-
`larly, in another Phase IT study in which patients received natal-
`izumab 3 or 6 mg/kg every 28 days for 6 months, there was
`minimal accumulation of the drug with multiple dosing as
`assessed by C..,, and AUC values. However, the mean half-life
`was slightly higher for the 6 mg/kg dose (262 h) than for the
`3 mg/kg dose (202 h) after multiple dose administrations.
`Theeffect of coadministration of natalizumab and intramuscu-
`lar IFIN-B-la on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of
`both drugs was evaluated in an oper+label study of 38 patients
`with relapsing—remitting MS [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Patients
`were required to have received intramuscular [FN-B-1a for at least
`3months and to be negative for antilFN-B-la antibodies.
`Patients received a single intravenous infusion of natalizurnab
`3 mg/kg (n = 15) or 6 mg/kg (n= 23). After coadministration of
`natalizumab and intramuscular
`IFN-B-la, pharmacokinetic
`parameters (e.g, AUC, C,,,, and half-life) for natalizurnab were
`similar to those observed in other pharmacokinetic analyses of
`natalizumab monotherapy. In addition, pharmacokinetic (AUC
`and C,,,.) and pharmacodynamic (f-2 microglobulin and neop-
`terin) parameters for intramuscular [FN-B-la before and after
`administration of natalizumab were not significantly different.
`These results suggest that the pharmacokinetics of natalizumab
`are not altered in the presence of intramuscular IFN-B-la and
`that natalizumab does not
`affect
`the pharmacokinetics or
`pharmacodynamics of intramuscular IFN-B-la.
`
`Natalizumab
`
`Table 1. Pharmacokinetic parameters of natalizumab
`after a single intravenous 3 mg/kg dosein six patients
`with relapsing—remitting or secondary progressive
`multiple sclerosis (19).
`
`Parameter
`
`AUC, (lg*h/ml)
`
`AUCact(lige him)
`
`Corey (g/mL)
`
`Tenax (1)
`
`Clearance (ml/kg)
`
`Vs (ml/kg)
`
`Value (mean + standard deviation)
`
`9899.00 + 1285.00
`
`9778.00 + 1380.00
`
`52.50 + 12.00
`
`2.07 £1.25
`
`0.30 + 0.00
`
`67.10 £17.10
`
`
`
`Half-life (h) 108.00 + 30.10
`
`AUC: Area under the curve; C...,: Maximum plasrna concentration,
`Trax. Hine to maximum plasma concentration;
`Vag ¥olume of distribution at steady state.
`
`
`
`Pharmacodynamics
`Single natalizumab doses of 1 to 6 mg/kg produce maximal
`saturation (defined as 80% saturation) of cg-integrin recep-
`tors on the surface of lymphocytes 24 h after administration
`[BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Approximately 90% of patients
`achieve over 80% saturation of Gty-integrin receptors after
`natalizumab doses of 3 and § mg/kg. Receptor saturation is
`maintained for 1, 3-4 and 6 weeks with natalizumab 1, 3 and
`6 mg/kg, respectively.
`against natalizumab was
`Development of antibodies
`observed in both Phase I and II studies, as may be expected
`with a monoclonal antibody product
`[16,19 Among the
`21 patients receiving natalizumab in a dose-ranging study,
`none of the patients in the lowest dose levels (0.03, 0.1, 0.3,
`1 mg/kg) developed antinatalizumab antibodies [19]. In con-
`trast, three out of six patients receiving natalizumab 3 mg/kg
`developed low and transient antibody levels. In a Phase II
`trial, antibodies against natalizumab were detected in 15 out
`of 142 patients (11%) receiving natalizumab 3 or 6 mg/kg
`[is]. The clinical impact of binding or blocking antibodies
`against natalizumab is currently not known.
`Natalizumab produced increased levels of circulating white
`blood cells
`(ie.,
`lymphocytes, monocytes and eosinophils)
`although the mean values did not exceed the normal range [16].
`The increase began within the first month of treatment, persisted
`throughout the treatment period and subsided after treatment was
`discontinued. This effect
`is consistent with the mechanism of
`
`action of natalizumab-inhibition of the migration of leukocytes to
`areas of inflammation by binding to Gy-integrin receptors. The
`increase in white blood cells did not exceed the upper limit of the
`normal range and does not appear to adversely affect safety.
`
`Pharmacokinetic modeling
`A population pharmacokinetic modeling assessment deter-
`mined that
`the clearance of natalizumab was only weakly
`
`www.future-drugs.com
`
`573
`
`

`

`Rudick & Sandrock
`
`related to body weight over the range of 40 to 100 kg [BlocEN
`IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Pharmacodynamic data also indicate that
`the 3 and 6 mg/kg monthly doses maintain adequate saturation
`of the o4-integrin receptor in approximately 90% of patients
`with MS. In addition, this analysis found that there is a plateau
`effect for efficacy at total doses of 300 mg or more. Based on
`these data, the mg/kg dosing schedules usedin early clinicaltri-
`als were considered unnecessary. Therefore, ongoing Phase III
`trials use a fixed S300 mg dose. In a pharmacokinetic study of a
`single dose of natalizumab 300 mg administered by intravenous
`infusion over 60 min in healthy volunteers (n = 65), mean con-
`centration of natalizumab and cy-integrin receptor saturation
`aver time were similar to those observed with mg/kg dosing
`(FIGURE 2) [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE],
`
`Clinical trials
`Phase | studies
`
`Four dose-ranging Phase I studies were completed as part of the
`natalizumab MS clinical development program to gather data
`on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety profile
`of the drug. One study was conducted in healthy volunteers
`while the other three evaluated natalizumab in patients with
`either relapsing—remitting or secondary progressive MS. Intra-
`venous doses of natalizumab 0.03-6 mg/kg were assessed. A
`published Phase I study reported that natalizurnab was well-tol-
`erated, with no serious adverse events reported during the study
`[ig]. Although the study was not designed to assess efficacy,
`there were no in-study disease exacerbations or any increase in
`disease activity as assessed by MRI.
`
`
`
`Meanconcentration
`
`wn oO
`
`he a
`
`(ug/ml)
`
`
`
`Overall, Phase I trials found that natalizumab was very well-
`tolerated, with an overall adverse event profile that did not dif-
`fer significantly from placebo. Pharmacokinetic and pharmaco-
`dynamic results from these studies also helped to identify the
`most appropriate natalizumab doses for use in subsequent
`Phase I and II MS trials.
`
`Phase It studies
`
`Overall, Phase H studies have demonstrated significant reduc-
`tions in inflammatory lesions, as visualized by MRI, and fewer
`patients with relapse during natalizumab treatment compared
`with placebo. The results of the published PhaseII trials are
`summarized in TABLE 2 [16,17].
`Tn the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, par-
`allel-group, Phase IT study, the safety and efficacy of natalizumab
`was evaluated in 180 patients with relapsing—-remitting or sec-
`ondary progressive MS [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Patients were
`randomized to a single intravenous infusion of natalizumab
`| mg/kg (n = 57), 3 mg/kg (n = 60) or placebo (n = 63) during
`the early phase of an acute exacerbation (within 96 h of onset)
`and observed for 14 weeks post treatment. There was no signifi-
`cant difference in the rate or degree of recovery from the exacer-
`bation, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale
`(EDSS). This finding is not unexpected due to the short treat-
`ment period and is consistent with other studies showing that.
`natalizumab does not affect the duration of enhancementin pre-
`existing lesions. A past hoc analysis showed a significant reduction
`in the volume of Gd+ lesions in the natalizumab 3 mg/kg group
`and the combined 1 and 3 mg/kg group compared with placebo.
`Given the role of G4 integrins in T-cell
`migration and lesion formation and the
`MRI changes produced by natalizumab in
`this trial, further clinical studies evaluating
`multiple
`doses
`of natalizumab were
`considered warranted.
`
`
`
`
`
`Meanpercentagesaturation
`
`7
`
`0
`
`7
`
`14
`
`21
`
`28
`
`Days post infusion
`
`100
`90
`80
`70
`60
`50
`40
`30
`20
`10
`
`=
`
`0
`
`7
`
`14
`
`Days post infusion
`
`=
`
`Zz
`
`Figure 2. Mean serum concentration (A) and mean percentage saturation of c4-integin
`receptors (B}) over time in healthy volunteers (n = 65) after a single 60 min intravenous
`infusion of natalizumab 300 mg.
`
`Tubridy and colleagues conducted a
`randomized, double-blind, placebo-con-
`trolled, parallel-group, Phase II study of
`the effect of natalizumab on brain lesion
`
`activity as detected by MRI in 72 subjects
`with active relapsing—remitting or second-
`ary progressive MS. This
`study was
`described in the pharmacokinetics sec-
`tion [17, BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Inclu-
`sion criteria included EDSS scores of 2.0
`to 7.0,
`inclusive,
`two or more clinical
`exacerbations within the past 18 months
`and more than 4 weeks since onset of last
`exacerbation. Patients were excluded if
`
`they had used immunomodulating drugs
`within the past 6 months, used corticos-
`teroids within the past 4 weeks or had a
`normal T2-weighted MRI scan at base-
`line. Patients were randomized to natali-
`zumab 3mg/kg (n = 37) or placebo
`
`574
`
`Expert Rev. Neurotherapeutics 4(4), (2004)
`
`

`

`Table 2. Summary of randomizied, double-blind, placebo-controlled, PhaseII clinical trials evaluating natalizumab in
`multiple sclerosis [16,17].
`
`
`Study
`duration
`
`Drug/dose
`
`Efficacy
`
`
`Ref.
`
`Natalizumab
`
`24.weeks
`
`Placebo (n = 35)
`Natalizumab 3 mg/kg every 28 days x2 (n = 37)
`
`12 weeks
`12 weeks
`
`
`
`Patients Patients
`Mean
`Mean
`Timepoint
`
`number of—qurnber of wilh no new with
`new active
`new Gd+
`Gadlesions relapses
`
`lesions
`lesions
`(%)}
`(%)
`3.6
`3.3
`73.1
`NR
`“1.8
`“16
`"83.6
`NR
`
`[17]
`
`24weeks
`
`Placebo (n = 71)
`Matalizumab 3 mg/kg every 28 days x6 (n = 68)
`Matalizumab 6 mg/kg every 28 days x6 (n = 74)
`
`24 weeks
`24 weeks
`24 weeks
`
`Q7
`380.8
`334]
`
`9.6
`3807
`37]
`
`32.0
`75.0
`65.0
`
`[16]
`
`38
`519
`519
`
`55 < 0.05,
`Sip < 0.001.
`GD+: Gadelinium-enhancing; NR: Not reported.
`
`(n = 35), administered as two intravenous infusions 28 days
`entry. A total of 213 patients with relapsing-remitting or
`secondary progressive MS were randomized to monthly
`apart and were observed for 24 weeks [i7]. During the first
`intravenous infusions of natalizumab 3 mg/kg (n = 68),
`12 weeks post-treatment, the mean cumulative number of new
`natalizumab 6 mg/kg (n = 74), or placebo (n= 71)
`for
`active lesions (ie., the number of new Gd+ lesions plus the
`6 months. Patients were monitored for adverse events
`number or new or newly enlarging T2 lesions — the primary
`outcome measure) was significantly reduced in patients receiv-
`throughout the study and for 6 months after cessation of
`ing natalizumab versus those receiving placebo (1.8 vs. 3.6;
`study therapy. There were no significant differences in base-
`p = 0.042), The mean number of new Gd+ lesions during the
`line patient demographics or MRI parameters among the
`first 12 weeks was also lower in the natalizumab group than in
`three treatment groups.
`The mean number of new Gd+ lesions (the primary out-
`the placebo group (1.6 vs. 3.3: p = 0.017). In addition, more
`come measure) was 9.6, 0.7 and 1.1 in the placebo and
`natalizumab-treated patients experienced no new Gd+ lesions
`natalizumab 3 and 6 mg/kg groups, respectively, over the
`during the first 12 weeks of therapy compared with the placebo
`6 months of treatment
`(p < 0.001 for both natalizumab
`group (83.6 vs. 73.19%; p = 0.037). However, natalizumab did
`doses vs. placebo) [16]. This represented reductions in new
`not appear to affect the duration of enhancementof lesions that
`lesions of 93% with natalizumab 3 mg/kg and 88% with
`existed prior to treatment.
`natalizumab 6 mg/kg compared with placebo. The differ-
`There was no statistically significant difference between
`natalizumab and placebo groups in the incidence of MS exacer-
`ence between natalizumab groups was not statistically sig-
`nificant. The decrease in new Gd+ lesions was evident both
`bations in the first 12 weeks of the study. However there was a
`difference in the latter 12 weeks of the study (weeks 12-24) in
`in patients with relapsing-remitting MS and in those with
`
`favor of placebo [BIOGEN IDEC, DATAON FILE]. The discrepancy in secondary progressive MS. Natalizumab also producedasig-
`nificant reduction in the number of new active lesions (0.8
`the numberof patients with relapse in the 12-week post-treat-
`and 1.1 for natalizumab 3 and 6 mg/kg, respectively, vs. 9.7
`ment phase was due to a reduction in relapses in the placebo
`group rather than a true increase in relapses in the Antegren
`for placebo; p < 0.001 for both natalizumab doses vs. pla-
`ceho).
`In addition, both dose levels of natalizumab pro-
`group. Disability scales did not show consistent or marked dif-
`ferences for patients receiving natalizumab versus placebo.
`duced substantial reductions in total volume of enhancing
`the
`However, this is not surprising, as improvement in disability
`
`
`lesions and=in percentage of scans showing
`
`
`
`has generally not been observed in trials of DMAsafter such a
`inflammatory activity compared with placebo.
`Although the study was not powered to detect statistically
`short treatment period [9-11].
`Another
`randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
`significant differences in clinical pararneters, natalizumab
`Phase II(b) study was conducted in 26 clinical centers in the
`demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes.
`In the
`USA, Canada and the UK [16]. Inclusion criteria included
`natalizumab groups, there was a reduction of approximately
`EDSSscores of 2.0 to 6.5, inclusive, two or more relapses
`50% in the number of patients experiencing a relapse com-
`pared with placebo (relapse experienced by 38% of patients in
`within the past 2 years and three or more T?2 lesions on
`MRI. Patients were excluded if they had used immunomod-
`the placebo group and 19% in each treatment group, p = 0.02
`for both natalizumab doses vs. placebo) [16]. Natalizumab 3
`ulating drugs within the past 3 months or had an MS
`and 6 mg/kg also significantly improved patients’ sense of
`relapse, or used corticosteroids within 30 days of study
`
`www.future-drugs.com
`
`575
`
`

`

`Rudick & Sandrock
`
`well-being (as measured by a visual analog scale) compared
`with placebo (p= 0.04 and 0.03, respectively}. In addition,
`more patients receiving placebo (819%) required intravenous
`methylprednisolone for the treatment of relapse than those
`receiving natalizumab 3 mg/kg (38%: p < 0.001) or 6 mg/kg
`(50%: p = 0.002).
`Additional analyses of these data [16] showed that natalizu-
`mabsignificantly suppresses the evolution of new Gd+ lesions
`to Tl-hypointense lesions [23]. Specifically, compared with
`placebo, natalizumab (3 or 6 mg/kg) significantly decreased
`the proportion of patients with new Gd+ lesions that evolved
`to Tl-hypointense lesions (p = 0.01), the proportion of new
`Gd+ lesions that became T1 hypointense (p = 0.045) and the
`odds ratio of converting from Gd+ into T1-hypointense
`lesions (p = 0.031),
`
`Phase Ili studies
`
`There are two ongoing Phase IIIclinical trials - AFFIRM and
`SENTINEL — designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of
`natalizumab alone (AFFIRM) or in combination with intra-
`muscular IFN-B-la (SENTINEL)
`in patients with relaps-
`ing-remitting MS. These 2-year trials are scheduled to be
`completed in late 2004 andearly 2005, respectively.
`AFFIRM is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel
`group, global study designed to evaluate the efficacy and
`safety profile of natalizumab over 2 years in patients with
`relapsing—-remitting MS [24]. Patients 18 to 50 years of age
`with a diagnosis of MS (McDonald criteria, 1-4) [25], a base-
`line EDSS score 0.0-5.0 (inclusive), one or more relapse
`within the past 12 months and MRI lesions consistent with
`MS were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included
`primary progressive, secondary progressive or progressive
`relapsing MS, relapse within 50 days of randomization or
`unstable from prior relapse; treatment with IFN-B or glati-
`ramer acetate for 6 months or more, treatment with IFN-B,
`glatiramer acetate, cyclosporin, azathioprine, methotrexate,
`or immunoglobulin within the past 6 months; and treat-
`ment with cyclophosphamide or mitoxantrone within the
`last year. A total of $42 patients were randomized (2:1) to
`natalizumab 300 mg or placebo intravenous infusion every
`4 weeks for up to 116 weeks [24].
`The primary efficacy outcomes of AFFIRM are the rate of
`clinical relapse at year 1 and sustained disability progression
`as assessed with the EDSS at year 2 [24]. Secondary measures
`at year 1 are the number of Gd+ lesions, the number of new
`or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions and the proportion of
`relapse-free subjects. Secondary measures at year 2 are the rate
`of relapse, the number of T1 hypointense lesions, the volume
`of T2 hyperintense lesions and the progression of disability
`assessed with the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite
`(MSFC)
`scale [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Additional end
`points include the assessment of quality of life, cognitive
`changes and brain parenchymal fraction. Safety assessments
`include laboratory testing, physical examinations and adverse
`event monitoring.
`
`SENTINEL is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-
`group, multicenter global study designed to determine the effi-
`cacy and safety of natalizumab when added to a standard regi-
`men of intramuscular IFN-B-la in a relapsing—-remitting MS
`patient population that experienced breakthrough disease
`(defined as 21 relapse within 12 months of study enrollment)
`while on intramuscular
`IFN-B-la therapy for
`at
`least
`12 months [26]. A total of 1196 patients were randomized 1:1
`to natalizumab 300 mg or placebo intravenous infusions every
`4 weeks in addition to their current IFN-B-la regimen (30 pig
`intramuscular weekly) for up to 116 weeks. Inclusion criteria
`included 18 to 55 years of age, an MS diagnosis (McDonald
`criteria,
`types 1-4)
`[25],
`a baseline EDSS score 0.0-5.0
`(inclusive),
`treatment with
`intramuscular
`for
`IFIN-B-la
`12 months or longer prior to randomization and MRIlesions
`consistent with MS. Patients with primary progressive, second-
`ary progressive or progressive relapsing M5, those with relapse
`within 50 days of randomization or unstable from priorrelapse
`and those receiving treatment with any IFN productaside from
`intramuscular IFN-B-la within 12 months of randomization or
`treatment with oral glatiramer acetate within 3 months of
`randomization were excluded [26, BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE].
`The primary efficacy outcomes of SENTINELarethe rate of
`clinical relapse at year 1 and sustained disability progression as
`assessed with the EDSS at year 2. Secondary measures at year 1
`are the number of new or enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions,
`the number of Gd+ lesions and the proportion of relapse-free
`subjects. Secondary measures at year 2 are the rate of relapse,
`the volume of T2 hyperintense lesions,
`the number of T1
`hypointense lesions and the progression of disability assessed
`with the MSFC scale [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE]. Additional
`end points include the assessment of quality of life, cognitive
`changes and brain parenchymal fraction. Safety assessments
`include laboratory testing, physical examinations and adverse
`event monitoring.
`
`Postmarketing surveillance, safety & tolerability
`Natalizumab is not currently approved by any regulatory
`agency for human use. Therefore, it’s use is restricted to clinical
`trials and no postmarketing data are available.
`Currently, natalizumab has been administered to over
`2800 patients, including healthy volunteers, patients with MS
`and those with inflammatory bowel disease [BIOGEN IDEC, DATA
`ON FILE]. In Phase I trials evaluating single intravenous doses of
`natalizumab, treatment was well-tolerated. ‘There were no clini-
`cally apparent changesin vital signs, laboratory values, or elec-
`trocardiograph measurements. Most of the adverse events were
`mild in severity with headache and fatigue being the most fre-
`quently reported events. Only one serious adverse event was
`reported in Phase | trials (ie., MS exacerbation and depression
`requiring hospitalization), although this event was considered
`unrelated to natalizumab. In Phase I trials with a placebo com-
`parator, no differences were noted between placebo and natali-
`zumab in the proportion of patients with an adverse event or a
`laboratory abnormality [19, BIOGEN IDEC, DATA ON FILE].
`
`576
`
`Expert Rev. Neurotherapeutics 4(4), (2004)
`
`

`

`
`
`Table 3. Adverse events reported among patients with
`relapsing-remitting or relapsing secondary progressive
`multiple sclerosis receiving natalizumab 3, 6 mg/kg or
`placebo every 28 days for 6 months [16].
`
`Adverse event
`
`Placebo Natalizumab Natalizumab
`(n = 71)
`3 mg/kg
`6 mg/kg
`(n = 68)
`(n = 74)
`Headache
`
`
`
`nfection
`
`Urinary tract infection
`
`Accidental injury
`
`Pharyngitis
`
`yasthenia
`Paresthesia
`
`Rash
`
`Pruritis
`
`Back pain
`Diarrhea
`
`Sinusitis
`
`
`
`1
`
`3
`
`5
`
`i
`
`4
`3
`
`3
`
`0
`
`8
`6
`
`4
`
`22
`
`22
`
`
`
`6
`
`4
`
`8
`3
`
`0
`
`2
`
`4
`0
`
`0
`
`19
`
`16
`
`18
`
`22
`
`g
`16
`
`1
`
`5
`
`12
`3
`
`4
`
`Natalizumab
`
`ranged from mild, nonserious allergic reactions to more seri-
`ous events (e.g., anaphylactoid). Most of these events have
`occurred during the second infusion of the drug, typically
`within 60 min of administration. These resolved rapidly after
`discontinuation of natalizumab and appropriate treatment
`(e.g.
`antihistamine
`and
`corticosteroids). Delayed-type
`immune reactions (ie., serum sickness) have been reported
`in two patients, accompanied by symptoms such as urticaria,
`erythema, cough, bronchospasm,
`sore throat,
`fever and
`The
`treated with
`sweats.
`patients were
`intravenous
`corticosteroids and/or antihistamines.
`
`Regulatory affairs
`Natalizumab has not been approved by the US Food and Drug
`Administration. The company submitted a Biologics Licensing
`Application on 24th May 2004 using the first year results from
`ongoing PhaseI] trials. This will allow the regulatory process
`to advance while the clinical trials continue.
`
`Conclusions
`
`Natalizumab is the first c.g-integrin antagonist in the new class
`of SAM inhibitors,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket