`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`HOPEWELL PHARMA VENTURES, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`MERCK SERONO SA,
`Patent Owner.
`____________________________________________
`Case IPR2023-00480
`U.S. Patent No. 7,713,947
`____________________________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64, Patent Owner submits the following
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`objections to evidence served with the Petition for inter partes review (“Petition”).
`
`Patent Owner’s objections apply equally to Petitioner’s reliance on these exhibits
`
`in any subsequently filed documents. These objections are timely, having been
`
`filed within ten business days of the Institution Decision (September 22, 2023).
`
`Exhibit 1002 (Declaration of Aaron Miller, Ph.D.).
`
`Patent Owner objects to exhibit 1002 as misleading, incomplete, and lacking
`
`relevance and because any probative value is substantially outweighed by the
`
`danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the fact finder, undue
`
`delay, and/or wasting time. See Fed. R. Evid. 106, 401, 402, and 403. In
`
`particular, Patent Owner objects to:
`
` ¶¶ 14-16, 19-30, 32-38, 43-49, 51-59, 61-63, 71, 77, 92, 96, 104, 106,
`
`109, 115, 119-120, 122-123, 125-126, 129-130, 133-134, 136-137,
`
`and 139-141 as misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant because they
`
`lack support for the contentions for which they are cited;
`
` ¶¶ 64-66 and 68-70 as misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant because
`
`they lack support for the contentions for which they are cited and
`
`improperly characterize the teachings of the ’947 patent;
`
` ¶¶ 17-18, 31, 39-42, 50, 60, 78-91, 93-95, 97-103, 105, 107-108, 110-
`
`114, 116-118, 121, 124, 127-128, 131-132, 135, and 138 as
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`misleading, incomplete, and irrelevant because they lack support for
`
`the contentions for which they are cited and improperly characterize
`
`the teachings of Bodor and Stelmasiak.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to ¶¶ 20-66, 68-71, and 77-141 as not being
`
`based on sufficient facts or data, the product of reliable principles and methods,
`
`and/or does not reflect a reliable application of the principles and methods to the
`
`facts. See Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to ¶¶ 1-13, 19, 23, 25, 29, 50-52, 62-63, 67-68,
`
`and 71-76 because these paragraphs are not directly cited in the Petition and the
`
`relevance of these paragraphs is not apparent. See Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to pages 91-93 because the chart therein is not
`
`directly cited in the Petition and the relevance of these pages is not apparent. See
`
`Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to ¶¶ 4, 15, 17, 25, 26, 34, 38, 57, 59, 93, 95,
`
`100, and 104, which contain citations to exhibits that are not cited in the Petition,
`
`as irrelevant. See Fed. R. Evid. 402.
`
`Exhibits 1003, 1017, 1038, 1042, 1043, 1045, 1046, and 1049.
`
`Patent Owner objects to exhibits 1003, 1017, 1038, 1042, 1043, 1045, 1046,
`
`and 1049 under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402, and 403 as lacking relevance and because
`
`their probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice,
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`confusing the issues, misleading the fact finder, undue delay, and/or wasting time.
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`Patent Owner further objects to these exhibits under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402
`
`because the exhibits are not cited in the Petition.
`
`To the extent exhibits 1003, 1017, 1038, 1042, 1043, 1045, 1046, and 1049
`
`are being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, the exhibits constitute
`
`inadmissible hearsay.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to exhibits 1003, 1017, 1038, 1042, 1043,
`
`1045, 1046, and 1049 under Fed. R. Evid. 901 because the documents lack
`
`authentication.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to any paragraph of exhibit 1002 to the extent it
`
`relies on exhibits 1003, 1017, 1038, 1042, 1043, 1045, 1046, or 1049 for at least
`
`the reasons identified here.
`
`Exhibits 1030, 1033, and 1039.
`
`Patent Owner objects to exhibits 1030, 1033, and 1039 under Fed. R. Evid.
`
`401, 402, and 403 as lacking relevance and because their probative value is
`
`substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues,
`
`misleading the fact finder, undue delay, and/or wasting time. Patent Owner further
`
`objects to these exhibits under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402 because the exhibits are not
`
`cited in the Petition. Moreover, Patent Owner objects to these exhibits under Fed.
`
`R. Evid. 401, 402 because the exhibits are not cited in the Miller Declaration.
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`To the extent exhibits 1030, 1033, and 1039 are being offered to prove the
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`truth of the matter asserted, the exhibits constitute inadmissible hearsay.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to exhibits 1030 and 1039 under Fed. R. Evid.
`
`901 because the documents lack authentication.
`
`Exhibits 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1018,
`
`1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1032, 1036,
`
`1040, 1044, 1047, 1048, 1050, and 1051.
`
`Patent Owner objects to exhibits 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012,
`
`1013, 1014, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029,
`
`1032, 1036, 1040, 1044, 1047, 1048, 1050, and 1051 under Fed. R. Evid. 401, 402,
`
`and 403 as lacking relevance and because their probative value is substantially
`
`outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the
`
`fact finder, undue delay, and/or wasting time.
`
`To the extent exhibits 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014,
`
`1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1024, 1026, 1036, 1040, 1044, 1047, 1048, and
`
`1050 are being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, the exhibits
`
`constitute inadmissible hearsay.
`
`Patent Owner further objects to exhibits 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010,
`
`1012, 1013, 1014, 1018, 1019, 1020, 1021, 1036, 1040, 1044, 1047, 1048, and
`
`1050 under Fed. R. Evid. 901 because the documents lack authentication.
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`Patent Owner further objects to exhibit 1044 as incomplete.
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`Patent Owner further objects to any paragraph of exhibit 1002 to the extent it
`
`relies on exhibit 1004, 1006, 1007, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1012, 1013, 1014, 1018,
`
`1019, 1020, 1021, 1022, 1024, 1025, 1026, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1032, 1036, 1040,
`
`1044, 1047, 1048, 1050, or 1051 for at least the reasons identified here.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 6, 2023
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Emily R. Whelan/
`Emily R. Whelan (Reg. No. 50,391)
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`60 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel. (617) 526-6567
`Email: Emily.Whelan@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`IPR2023-00480
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`I hereby certify that, on October 6, 2023, I caused a true and correct copy of
`
`the following document:
`
`
`
`Patent Owner’s Objections to Evidence Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64
`
`to be served via e-mail, as consented to by Petitioner, on the following attorneys of
`
`record:
`
`
`
`
`
`eellison-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`opartington-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`cvira-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`jcrozendaal-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`PTAB@sternekessler.com
`
`By: /Cindy Kan/
`Cindy Kan (Reg. No. 76,385)
`Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
`7 World Trade Center
`250 Greenwich Street
`New York, NY 10007
`Tel: 212-295-6470
`Email: cindy.kan@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`