`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Friday, March 1, 2024 10:23 AM
`Mark McCarthy; Trials
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com; jordan@unifiedpatents.com;
`acheung@unifiedpatents.com; aliou@jonesday.com; vkhatri@jonesday.com;
`mwjohnson@jonesday.com; etassis@jonesday.com; tj@unifiedpatents.com; John
`Wittenzellner; IPR Dynapass WSL; afawzy@unifiedpatents.com
`RE: IPR2023-00425: Request to withdraw Ex. 2007 and refile Patent Owner's Sur-Reply
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
`
`Counsel,
`
`The panel authorizes Patent Owner to withdraw the supplemental expert declara(cid:415)on (Ex. 2007), and refile Patent
`Owner’s Sur-Reply without any cita(cid:415)ons to the supplemental expert declara(cid:415)on. The panel notes that Pe(cid:415)(cid:415)oner does
`not oppose Patent Owner’s request.
`
`Patent Owner should file a copy of this email as an exhibit to document the panel’s authoriza(cid:415)on.
`
`Regards,
`
`Esther Goldschlager
`Supervisory Paralegal Specialist
`Patent Trial & Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`From: Mark McCarthy <mmccarthy@wsltrial.com>
`Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 8:55 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: roshan@unifiedpatents.com; jordan@unifiedpatents.com; acheung@unifiedpatents.com; aliou@jonesday.com;
`vkhatri@jonesday.com; mwjohnson@jonesday.com; etassis@jonesday.com; tj@unifiedpatents.com; John Wittenzellner
`<johnw@wsltrial.com>; IPR Dynapass WSL <iprdynapasswsl@wsltrial.com>; afawzy@unifiedpatents.com
`Subject: IPR2023-00425: Request to withdraw Ex. 2007 and refile Patent Owner's Sur-Reply
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on
`links, or opening attachments.
`
`Honorable Board:
`
`
`On Feb. 20, Patent Owner filed a Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s Reply (Paper 18) accompanied by a supplemental expert
`declaration (Ex. 2007). To comply with Rule 42.23(b), Patent Owner requests permission to both withdraw the
`supplemental expert declaration (Ex. 2007), and refile Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply without any citations to the
`supplemental expert declaration.
`
`Patent Owner has conferred with Petitioner. Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s request.
`
`
`Best Regards,
`
`
`1
`
`Ex. 2008
`Unified Patents, LLC v. Dynapass IP Holdings LLC, IPR2023-00425
`
`
`
`Mark McCarthy | Associate | Counsel for Patent Owner
`Williams Simons & Landis PLLC
`The Littlefield Building
`601 Congress Avenue, Suite 600
`Austin, Texas 78701
`Direct: 512.717.6583
`Main: 512.543.1354
`Fax: 512.793.9575
`
`
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to
`be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
`representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email
`and any attachments or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
`immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank You.
`
`2
`
`Ex. 2008
`Unified Patents, LLC v. Dynapass IP Holdings LLC, IPR2023-00425
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
