506148180
`
`07/10/2020
`
`PATENT ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET
`
`EPAS ID: PAT6194912
`
`Electronic Version v1.1
`Stylesheet Version v1.2
`
`SUBMISSION TYPE:
`
`NEW ASSIGNMENT
`
`NATURE OF CONVEYANCE:
`
`CHANGE OF NAME
`
`CONVEYING PARTY DATA
`
`VPN MULTICAST TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`Execution Date
`
`08/31/2016
`
`RECEIVING PARTY DATA
`
`Name:«(MEST
`
`PROPERTY NUMBERS Total: 7
`
`Patent Number:
`
`Patent Number:
`
`7444425
`
`7664056
`
`CORRESPONDENCE DATA
`
`AddressLine 4:
`
`SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118
`
`
`
`Fax Number:
`Correspondencewill be sent to the e-mail addressfirst; if that is unsuccessful, it will be sent
`using a fax number,if provided; if that is unsuccessful, it will be sent via US Mail.
`Email:
`mcatelani@anixa.com
`Correspondent Name:
`MIKE CATELANI
`AddressLine1:
`3150 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAYSUITE 250
`
`
`
`
`
`P|fisdocumentseesasanOathiDeclaralon@7OFR163.
`
`Total Attachments: 3
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 001
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 001
`
`

`

`source=Change_Name_Meetrix_IP#page1.tif
`
`source=Change_Name_Meetrix_IP#page2.tif source=Change_Name_Meetrix_IP#page3.tif
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 002
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 002
`
`

`

`
` This space reserved for office use,
`Form 424
`
`(Revised 05/11)
`
`
`
`Certificate of Amendment
`
`
`
`Submit in duplicate to:
`Secretary of State
`P.O. Box 13697
`Austin, TX 78711-3697
`512 463-5555
`FAX: 512/463-5709
`Filing Fee: See instructions
`
`FILED
`In the
`Secratary atffes0ft Texan
`SEP 01 2016
`
`Corporations Section
`
`Entity Information
`
`The nameofthe filing entity is:
`
`VPN Multicast Technologies, LLC
`
`State the nameof the entity as currently shown in the records of the secretary of state. If the amendment changes the name
`of the entity, state the old name and not the new name.
`
`The filing entity isa: (Select the appropriate entity type below.)
`_} For-profit Corporation
`J Professional Corporation
`[_] Nonprofit Corporation
`] Professional Limited Liability Company
`| Cooperative Association
`[_] Professional Association
`Limited Liability Company
`(-) Limited Partnership
`
`~
`
`The file numberissuedto the filing entity by the secretary of state is: 802075884
`The date of formation of the entity is:
`10/03/2014
`
`Amendments
`
`1. Amended Name
`(If the purpose ofthe certificate of amendmentis to change the name ofthe entity, use the following statement}
`The amendment changesthe certificate of formation to changethe article or provision that names the
`filing entity. The article or provision is amended to read as follows:
`The nameofthe filing entity is: (state the new nameofthe entity below)
`
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`The name ofthe entity must contain an organizational designation or accepted abbreviation ofsuch term, as applicable.
`
`2. Amended Registered Agent/Registered Office
`
`The amendment changesthe certificate of formation to change the article or provision stating the
`name of the registered agent and the registered office address of the filing entity. The article or
`provision is amendedto read as follows:
`RECEIVED
`
`SEP 0 1 2016
`
`Form 424
`
`Secretary of State
`
`6
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 003
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 003
`
`

`

`Registered Agent
`(Complete either A or B, but not beth. Also complete C.)
`A. The registered agent is an organization (cannot be entity named above) by the name of:
`
`Capitol Corporate Services
`OR
`[| B. The registeredagentis an individual resident of the state whose nameis:
`
`First Name
`MA.
`Last Name
`,
`Suffix
`The person executing this instrument affirms that the person designated as the new registered agent
`has consented to serve as registered agent.
`
`C. The business address of the registered agent and the registered office addressis:
`206 E 9th Street, Suite 1360
`Austin
`,
`TX 78701-4411
`Street Address (No P.O. Box)
`City
`State
`Zip Code
`
`>
`
`-
`3. Other Added, Altered, or Deleted Provisions
`Other changes or additions to the certificate of formation may be madein the space provided below. If the space provided
`is insufficient, incorporate the additional text by providing an attachmentto this form. Please read the instructionsto this
`form for further information on format.
`.
`
`[_] Delete each of the provisions identified below from thecertificate of formation.
`
`Text Area (The attached addendum, if any, is incorporated herein byreference.)
`
`[_] Add eachofthe followingprovisionsto the certificate of formation. The identification or
`reference ofthe added provision andthe full text are as follows:
`
`[_] Alter eachofthe following provisionsofthe certificate of formation. The identification or
`reference of the altered provision and the full text of the provision as amended are as follows:
`.
`
`Statement of Approval
`
`The amendments to the certificate of formation have been approved in the manner required by the
`Texas Business Organizations Code and by the governing documentsoftheentity.
`
`Form 424
`
`.
`
`7
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 004
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 004
`
`

`

`Effectiveness of Filing(Select cither A. B, or C.)
`
`A.|v]This document becomeseffective when the documentis filed by the secretary ofstate.
`B. [_] This document becomes effective at a later date, which is not more than ninety (90) days from
`the date of signing. The delayed effective date is:
`C. [_] This documenttakes effect upon the occurrence of a future event or fact, other than the
`passage of time. The 90" dayafter the date of signingis:
`The following event or fact will cause the documentto take effect in the manner described below:
`
`
`
`The undersigned signs this document subject to the penalties imposed by law for the submission of a
`materially false or fraudulent instrument and certifies under penalty of perjury that the undersignedis
`authorized under the provisions of law governing the entity to execute the filing instrument.
`
`Execution
`
`Date:
`
`8/31/16
`
`By: Henky f Herns
`
`Henry P Herms (Aug 31, 2016}
`
`Signature of authorized person
`
`Henry P Herms
`Printed or typed name of authorized person (see instructions)
`
`Form 424
`
`,
`
`g
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 005
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 005
`
`

`

`Case No: 1:18cv309
`
`Filed: 04/22/19
`Doc. #40
`
`AO 120 (Rev, 08/10
`
`TO:
`°
`
`Mail Stop 8
`.
`Director of the U.S, Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`on the following
`Ci) Trademarksor
`[4 Patents.
`( LJ the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`
`
`
`DATE FILED
`DOCKET NO.
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`1:18-CV-309-RP
`4/13/2018
`
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`
`PLAINTIFF
`DEFENDANT
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`
`
`
`gaan |SSCS
`
`
`Pqoaisas||
`
`
`
`3995 3330
`Pastauie|
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`[1 Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`CL] Answer
`
`CI Cross Bill
`
`LC Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`Final Judgment Attached
`
`* Jeannette J. Clack
`
`oF
`
`WA
`
`a
`
`Mies
`
`DATE
`
`04/22/2019
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—-Upon terminationof action, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Case file copy
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 006
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 006
`
`

`

`Case No: 1:18cv309
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`AUSTIN DIVISION
`
`Filed: 04/22/19
`Doc. #39
`
`F | L Ec 3)
`
`2OI9APR 22 PM 2: SW
`
`CLERK USis
`WESTERN GISTi
`
`
`
`MEETRIX IP, LLC,
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`_
`
`V.
`
`.
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS,INC.,
`DEFENDANT.
`
`§
`g
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`CAUSE NO.1:18-CV-309-LY
`
`FINALJUDGMENT
`
`Before the court is the aboveentitled cause ofaction. On April 19, 2019, the parties filed an
`
`Agreed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. #36), which the court granted by separate order.
`
`Accordingly, the court renders the following Final Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`Procedure 58.
`|
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDEREDthat the case hereby CLOSED.
`SIGNEDthiskk day ofApril, 2019.
`
`
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 007
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 007
`
`

`

`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`on the following
`(J Trademarks or
`[Mf Patents.
`¢ [1 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO,
`1:18-CV-310-RP
`PLAINTIFF
`
`DATE FILED
`4/13/2018
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO,
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`Microsoft Corporation
`
`
`
`
`
`
`peff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`— I
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`n the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`CI Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`C] Answer
`
`(1 Cross Bill
`
`C] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`In the above—entitied case, the following decision has been rendered or judgement issued:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`Copy2—Uponfilingdocumentaddingpatent(s),mailthis teDirector—‘asefilecopy tupy
`
`
`
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation ofaction, mailthis copyto Deuorcse4g pyXurAtilgation ofaction, mailthis copyto Director
`
`
`
`
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 008
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 008
`
`

`

`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S, Patent and TrademarkOffice
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`filed in the U-S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`on the following
`CTrademarks or
`Gf Patents.
`( 0 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1:18-CV-309-RP
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`4/13/2018
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`4339097 |__«(|
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`79
`
`PATENT OR
`
`DATE OF PATENT
`
`074 a |_Sid|
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—-entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`(J Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`LJ Answer
`
`C] Cross Bill
`
`(] Other Pleading
`
`-
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`Copy —Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mailth
`
`JeannetteJ. Clack Sy“DPR13-2018joJeannetteJ.Clack({\\A
`x
`QMiofaction,mailthiscopyto Directorcopy-+t6 Director A4#—-Casefilecopy
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation ofaction, mail this copy to Rirector CopysyponAN
`
`CLERK
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 009
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 009
`
`

`

`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 8
`Entered: May 7, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`Vv.
`
`MEETRIXIP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`Case IPR2019-00539 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00540 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00541 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00542 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00543 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00544 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)!
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, GREGG I. ANDERSON,and
`SCOTT B. HOWARD,Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`ANDERSON,Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Terminate
`37 CER. § 42.72
`
`' The parties are not authorized to use this caption. The parties should use the
`caption applicable to the specific case.
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 010
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 010
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00539 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00540 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00541 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case. IPR2019-00542 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00543 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00544 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Per our email dated April 19, 2019, we authorized the filing of a motion
`
`to terminate the above identified proceedings (“539 IPR,” °°540 IPR,” “541
`
`IPR,” “°542 IPR,”“?543 IPR,” and “544 IPR”respectively, collectively
`“Settled IPRs’). Settled IPRs, Ex. 3001. The ’539 and ’540 IPRs challenge
`
`claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,253,332. The ’541 and °542 IPRs challenge claims
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 9,094,525. The ’543 and 544 IPRschallenge claims of U.S.
`
`Patent No. 9,843,612. Per our authorization, on May 3, 2019, Cisco Systems,
`
`Inc. (“Petitioner”) and Meetrix IP LLC. (“Patent Owner”) filed a Joint Motion
`
`to Dismiss the Petition (“Joint Motion”) for each proceeding. Settled IPRs,
`
`Paper 6. Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Motion, the parties filed a
`
`Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential
`Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) (“Joint Request”). Settled IPRs,
`Paper 7; see also Ex. 1048 (Settlement and License Agreement(“Settlement
`
`Agreement”), Section 7. Confidentiality).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The Joint Motion in the Settle IPRs sets forth the parties’ agreement that
`
`they have settled their dispute with respect to the challenged patents and have
`
`reached agreementto seek termination the Settled IPRs. Settled IPRs, Paper 6,
`2. A true andcorrect copy ofthe Settlement Agreement wasfiled with the Joint
`Motion as business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`Id.; see Exhibit 1048. Theparties assert that there “are no collateral agreements
`or understandings madein connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 011
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 011
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00539 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00540 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00541 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00542 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00543 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00544 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`
`termination” of the proceedings. Settled IPRs, Paper 6, 2. The parties request
`
`dismissal of the Settled IPRs. Id.
`
`These proceedingsare at a very early stage, no preliminary response has
`been filed, no institution decision has been entered, andtrial has not
`commenced. Weare persuadedthat, under these circumstances, it is
`appropriate to dismiss all pending proceedings betweenthe parties as identified
`
`above. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`ORDER
`
`Accordingly,it is:
`
`ORDEREDthatthe joint motion to terminate the proceedingsis
`GRANTED,andthe 539, ’540, 541, °542, °543, and ’544 IPR proceedingsare
`
`hereby DISMISSEDasto all parties;
`
`FURTHER ORDEREDthatthe parties’ joint request to treat the
`
`Settlement Agreement confidential is GRANTED,andthe specified exhibits
`
`shall be: (i) treated as business confidential information;(ii) kept separate from
`the files of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,253,332; 9,094,525; and 9,843,612; (iii) kept
`
`confidential from any third party; (iv) filed as “BOARD AND PARTIES
`
`ONLY”as accessible only to the Board and the parties to this proceeding; and
`
`(v) made available only to Federal Government agencies on written request, or
`
`to any person on a showingof good cause, under the provisions of 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c); and
`FURTHER ORDEREDthat a copy of this Order will be filed in the ’539,
`
`’540, °541, °542, °543, and °544 IPR.
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 012
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 012
`
`

`

`Case IPR2019-00539 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00540 (Patent 9,253,332 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00541 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00542 (Patent 9,094,525 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00543 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`Case IPR2019-00544 (Patent 9,843,612 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David L. McCombs
`Theodore M. Foster
`Gregory P. Huh
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`ipr.theo.foster@haynesboone.com
`gregory.huh.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Gilbert A. Greene
`DUANE MORRIS, LLP
`bgreene@duanemorris.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Gregory S. Donahue
`Andrew G. DiNovo
`DINOVO PRICE LLP
`gdonahue@dinovoprice.com
`adinovo@dinovoprice.com
`docketing@dinovoprice.com
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 013
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 013
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01034-RP Document6 Filed 09/06/16 Page 2 of 2
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S.District Court
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`on the following
`Trademarksor
`K] Patents.
`( (7 the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1:16-CV-1034-RP
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`9/2/2016
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`LogMeIn, Inc.
`
`
`
`*~DATE OF PATENT
`PATENT OR
`eT_|SnD
`GIS3 33.
`2 GOGY SPS pt
`£33499 pe
`
`po
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO
`
`O Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`(C1 Answer
`
`0 CrossBill
`
`C] Other Pleading
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`1 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pt
`‘ eeee
`
`aee
`DECISION/JUDGEMENT
`
`
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`
`CLERK
`Jeannette J. Clack
`
`(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
`
`DATE
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation of action, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Uponterminationofaction, mail this copy to Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`a cc
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zo
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 014
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01933-RP Document 4 Filed 09/06/16 Page 1 of 2
`
`TRADEMARK
`
`Mail Stop 8
`Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`REPORT ON THE
`FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN
`ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR
`
`In Compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 you are hereby advised that a court action has been
`
`filed in the U.S. District Court
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`on the following
`(J Trademarks or
`#7Patents,
`(oO ‘the patent action involves 35 U.S.C, § 292.):
`
`DOCKET NO.
`1:16-CV-1033-RP
`PLAINTIFF
`
`Meetrix IP, LLC
`
`DATE FILED
`9/2/2016
`
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`Western District of Texas, Austin Division
`DEFENDANT
`
`Citrix Systems, Inc.
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`DATEOFPATENT
`
`Format mid/yyyy
`
`
`i
`
`DATE INCLUDED
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following patent(s)/ trademark(s) have been included:
`INCLUDED BY
`
`([] Answer
`
`CJ Cross Bill
`
`
`(] Other Pleading
`
`PATENT OR
`TRADEMARK NO.
`
`(J Amendment
`DATE OF PATENT
`OR TRADEMARK
`
`
`9/6/2016
`
`HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK
`
`4 .
`
`In the above—entitled case, the following decision has been rendered or judgementissued:
`DECISIONJUDGEMENT
`
`CLERK
`Jeannette J. Clack
`
`(BY) DEPUTY ALERK
`ye
`
`é
`
`Copy 1—Uponinitiation ofaction, mail this copy to Director Copy 3—Upon termination of action, mail this copyto Director
`Copy 2—Uponfiling document adding patent(s), mail this copy to Director Copy 4—Casefile copy
`
`a acc
`
`Zoho Corp. and
`
`.
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 015
`
`

`

`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`PATENT NO.
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`: 9,253,332 B2
`: 13/674227
`
`DATED
`INVENTOR(S)
`
`: February 2, 2016
`: Thomas Dyeetal.
`
`Page | of 1
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below:
`
`Title Page 2, Item (56) References Cited, Other Publications:
`Column 2, line 53: change “Architecure” to -- Architecture --; and
`Column 2, line 67: change “vol. 8”to -- vol. 6 --.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`Second Day of August, 2016
`
`Wwiebtle Ko Lea
`
`Michelle K. Lee
`
`Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 016
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 016
`
`

`

`PATENT
`Attorney Docket No. 207.0002-02000
`Customer No. 22882
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE
`
`In re U.S. Patentof:
`Thomas Dyeet al.
`Patent No.: 9,253,332
`Issue Date: February 2, 2016
`For: VOICE CONFERENCE CALL
`USING PSTN AND INTERNET
`NETWORKS
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Confirmation No.: 1951
`
`(Serial No.: 13/674,227)
`(Filed: November12, 2013)
`
`Certificate of Correction Branch
`Commissionerfor Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`Sir:
`
`REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 254 and 37 C.F.R. § 1.322, this is a request for the
`issuance of a Certificate of Correction in the above-identified patent. A copy of Form
`PTO/SB/44is appended; the complete Certificate of Correction involves one page.
`The mistakesidentified in the appended Form occurred through the fault of the
`Patent Office, as clearly disclosed by the records of the application which maturedinto
`this patent, and as evidenced in the attached copy of page 2 of Form PTO/SB/08
`
`submitted with the Information Disclosure Statement on May 18, 2015.
`Issuance of the Certificate of Correction containing the correction is earnestly
`requested.
`
`Dated: May 31, 2016
`
`5151 Headquarters Drive, Suite 170
`Plano, Texas 75024
`Telephone: (972) 668-3050
`Facsimile: (972) 668-3056
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP
`
`By:__/Brent D. Martin/
`Brent D. Martin
`Registration No. 62,717
`
`Zoho Corp. and ZohoCorp.Pvt., Ltd.
`
`Exhibit 1005 — 017
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 017
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/44 (09-07)
`Approved for use through 08/31/2013. OMB 0651-0033
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respondto a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
`(Also Form PTO-1050)
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`
`:
`PATENT NO.
`APPLICATION NO. :
`ISSUE DATE
`:
`INVENTOR(S)
`:
`
`9,253,332
`13/674,227
`February 2, 2016
`Thomas Dyeetal.
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`It is certified that an error appears or errors appearin the above-identified patent and that said Letters
`Patent is hereby corrected as shownbelow:
`
`Title Page 2, Section (56) References Cited, Other Publications:
`Column 2, line 53: change “Architecure” to -- Architecture --; and
`Column 2, line 67: change “vol. 8” to -- vol. 6 --.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAILING ADDRESS OF SENDER:
`Martin & Ferraro, LLP
`1557 Lake O’Pines Street, NE
`Hartville, Ohio 44632
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 018
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 018
`
`

`

`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`Application Number: 13/674,227
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VPN Multicast Technologies LLC v. AT&T Corp.; VPN Multicast Technologies LLC v. Dimension Data North
`America, Inc., et al.; Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions including Appendix A and Claim Charts, Case Nos.
`2:14-cv-1013 and 2:14-cv-1014; April 16, 2015; 2,274 pages.
`
`VPN Multicast Technologies LLC v. AT&T Corp.; VPN Multicast Technologies LLC v. Dimension Data North
`
`America, Inc., et al.; AT&T's Objections and Responses to VPN's First Set of CommonInterrogatories; Case
`Nos. 2:14-cv-1013 and 2:14-cv-1014; April 23, 2015; 20 pages.
`
`
`Alchaal et al., "Offering a Multicast Delivery Service in a Programmable Secure IP VPN Environment," Fourth
`
`
`
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`International Workshop on Networked Group Communication (NGC '02), 2002, 6 pgs.
`
`
`Bokun et al., “The MECCANOInternet Multimedia Conferencing Architecture,” Multimedia Education and
`
`
`
`Conferencing Collaboration over ATM Networks and Others (MECCANO), Ver. 3.1.2, December 1999, 67 pgs.
`Cisco Systems, Inc., “Multicast VPN Design Guide — Cisco Systems,” August 9, 2003, 25 pgs.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., “Multicast VPN — IP Multicast Support for MPLS VPNs,” 2002, 86 pgs.
`
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., “Networkers: Multicast Support for MPLS/BGP VPNs: RST-322,” cisco.com, 2001, 89 pgs.
`
`Comer,“Internetworking with TCP/IP VolI: Principles, Protocols, and Architecture,” Third Edition, March 1995,
`628 pgs.
`
`
`Costa et al., “An Introduction to Virtual Private Networks: Towards D-VPNs,” Network and Information Systems
`Journal, Vol. 2, June 2000, 20 pgs.
`
`Eriksson, “MBONE: The Multicast Backbone,” ACM Communications of the ACM 37, 8, August 1994, Pages
`
`54-60, 11 pgs.
`
`Finlayson, “The UDP Multicast Tunneling Protocol,” Network Working Group, Internet Draft, November 19,
`1997, 6 pgs.
`Higgins, L. et al. "Tunneling Multicast Traffic Through Non-Multicast A ware Networks and Encryption Devices.”
`MILCOM 2001. Proceedings. Communications for Network-Centric Operations: Creating the Information Force.
`McLean, VA Oct.28-30, 2001: IEEE Military Communications Conference. New York, NY: IEEE, US. vol. 1 of 2,
`Oct. 28, 2001. pp296-300...
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Lit. += Lit. 2eeecoleteCoreaoe or the Internet Protocol,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments:
`
`2401, Obsoletes: 1825, Category: Standards Track, November 1998, 61 pgs.
`St
`
`Lit. 1: Lit. 2
`Kirsteinet al., “The RadioActive Networking Architecture,” IEEE, DARPA Active Networks Conference and
`
`a Exposition, 2002. Proceedings, May 2002, 16 pgs.
`
`Lit. 1; Lit 2.|Kumar, “MBone: Interactive Multimedia on the Internet,” New Riders Publishing, 1996, 242 pgs.
`
`
`
`Labonte et al., “Group ManagementStrategies for Secure Multicasting on Active Virtual Private Networks,”
`
`IEEE, 25th annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks, Pages 213-222, November 2000, 10 pgs.
`
`
`Lamasteret al., “Internet
`teehralogies and requirements for telemedicine,” Minimally Invasive Therapy and
`
`
`Allied Technologies 199A Vol. 6,JNo. 5-6, Pages 436-443, 1997, 8 pgs.
`
`Macedonia et al., “MBone Provides Audio and Video Acrossthe Internet,” U.S. Naval Post Graduate School
`
`
`
`Website, available at http:/Avww.nps.edu/library, April 1994, 8 pgs.
`
`
`Rosenet al., “Multicast in MPLS/BGP VPNs,” Network Working Group, Internet Draft, November 2000, 17 pgs.
`
`
`
`Savetz et al., “MBONE: Multicasting Tomorrow'sInternet,” IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1996, 259 pgs.
`
`
`Waitzmanet al., “Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol,” Networks Working Group, Request For
`
`
`Comments: 1075, November 1988, 24 pgs.
`
`
`Wittmann et al., “Multicast Communication: Protocols and Applications,” Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1999,
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`362 pgs.
`
`
`
`
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`
`
`WopLit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`Lit. 1; Lit. 2
`
`
`
`
`
`DATE CONSIDERED
`EXAMINER
`EXAMINER:Initial if citation considered, whether ornotcitation is in conformance with MPEP § 609; Draw line through citation if not in
`Include copyof this form with next communication to the applicant.
`conformance and not considered.
`
`PTO/SB/08 (10-92)
`
`2
`
`Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 019
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 019
`
`

`

`Title of Invention:
`
`VOICE CONFERENCE CALL USING PSTN AND INTERNET NETWORKS
`
`Electronic AcknowledgementReceipt
`
`Application Number:
`
`13674227
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`1951
`
`
`
`eC
`
`Paymentinformation:
`
`File Listing:
`
`Information:
`
`Pages
`Multi
`File Size(Bytes)/
`DocumentDescription
`Document
`
`
`
`Number Message Digest|Part/.zip|P (if appl.)
`480057
`
`Requestfor Certificate of Correction
`
`COC_Request.pdf
`
`893 1ba425ec10cObaSd208c1 3bb367e71c5}
`
`Exhibit 1005 — 020
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 020
`
`

`

`This AcknowledgementReceipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO ofthe indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable.It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`Total Files Size (in bytes)
`
`480057
`
`the application.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105)will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shownon this AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the international filing date of
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary componentsfora filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shownonthis
`AcknowledgementReceiptwill establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903indicating acceptanceof the application as a
`national stage submission under35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 021
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 021
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Vatent and TrademarkOffice
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`www.uspto.g:
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`13/674,227
`
`ISSUE DATE
`
`02/02/2016
`
`22882
`
`7590
`
`01/13/2016
`
`MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP
`1557 LAKE O'PINES STREET, NE
`HARTVILLE,OH 44632
`
`PATENT NO.
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKETNO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`9253332
`
`207.0002-02000
`
`1951
`
`The projected patent numberandissue date are specified above.
`
`ISSUE NOTIFICATION
`
`Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b)
`(application filed on or after May 29, 2000)
`
`The Patent Term Adjustment is 166 day(s). Any patent to issue from the above-identified application will
`include an indication of the adjustment on the front page.
`
`If a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) wasfiled in the above-identified application, the filing date that
`determines Patent Term Adjustmentis the filing date of the most recent CPA.
`
`Applicant will be able to obtain more detailed information by accessing the Patent Application Information
`Retrieval (PAIR) WEBsite (http://pair-uspto. gov).
`
`Any questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the
`Office of Patent Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee
`payments should be directed to the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Data Management
`(ODM)at (571)-272-4200.
`
`APPLICANT(s)(Please see PAIR WEBsite http://pair.uspto.gov for additional applicants):
`
`Thomas Dye, Austin, TX;
`VPN Multicast Technologies LLC, Plano, TX
`Thomas Dundon, San Marcos, TX;
`
`The United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world andis an unparalleled location
`for business investment, innovation, and commercialization of new technologies. The USA offers tremendous
`resources and advantages for those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation
`worksto encourage andfacilitate business investment. To learn more about why the USAis the best country in
`the world to develop technology, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA. gov.
`
`IR103 (Rev. 10/09)
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 — 022
`
`Zoho Corp. and Zoho Corp. Pvt., Ltd.
`Exhibit 1005 – 022
`
`

`

`PART B - FRE(S) TRANSMITTAL
`
`Complete and send this form, together with applicable [ce(s), to: Mal Mail Stop ISSUE PER
`Commissioner for Patents
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1456
`or Fax (871)-273-2885
`
`
`
`
`through 5 should be completed where
`JCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION PEE Gfr