throbber

`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TOGAIL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`Issue Date: September 29, 2020
`
`Title: ON-DEMAND SYSTEM INFORMATION REQUEST
`PROCEDURE AND ERROR HANDLING
`
`_____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No.: 2023-00338
`_____________________
`
`PETITION FOR INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD”
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`
`OVERVIEW ....................................................................................... 1
`I.
`II. GROUNDS FOR STANDING .............................................................. 1
`III. U.S. PATENT 10,791,502 .................................................................... 2
`A.
`Summary ...................................................................................2
`B.
`Prosecution History.....................................................................4
`C. Claim Construction .....................................................................5
`D.
`Priority of the Challenged Claims .................................................6
`E.
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA) ....................................6
`F.
`State of the Art ...........................................................................6
`1.
`3GPP ...............................................................................7
`2. Well Known 3GPP Concepts...............................................8
`IV. THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE ...................... 15
`A. Ground 1: Claims 1, 4-7, 11, 14-17 Are Obvious Over Lee ............ 15
`1.
`Lee................................................................................. 15
`2.
`Detailed Application to the Challenged Claims .................... 18
`B. Grounds 2 and 3: Claims 1, 4-7, 11, 14-17 Are Obvious Over
`Oppo; and Claim 1 Is Anticipated by Oppo .................................. 49
`1.
`Oppo .............................................................................. 49
`2.
`Detailed Application to the Challenged Claims .................... 53
`THE BOARD SHOULD NOT EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO
`DENY INSTITUTION UNDER §314 .................................................. 72
`VI. MANDATORY NOTICES UNDER 37 C.F.R. §42.8 ............................. 73
`
`V.
`
`
`
`
`
`ii
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`A. Real Party-in-Interest (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(1))............................... 73
`B. Related Matters (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(2))....................................... 73
`1.
`Judicial Matters ............................................................... 73
`2.
`Administrative Matters: .................................................... 74
`Lead/Back-up Counsel (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3)): ............................ 75
`C.
`D. Notice of Service Information (37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(4)): .................. 76
`
`
`
`iii
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Cases
`AC Techs., S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 912 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2019) ........... 34, 61
`Cradlepoint, Inc. v. Sisvel Int’l S.A., IPR2020-01103, Paper 46, 10
`(Jan. 18, 2022) ....................................................................................... 50
`Flex Logix Techs Inc. v Venkat Konda, PGR2019-00042, Paper 35
`(Mar. 16, 2021) ...................................................................................... 16
`Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Mustek Sys., Inc., 340 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir.
`2003) ............................................................................................... 34, 61
`Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Google LLC, 948 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir.
`2020) ............................................................................................. Passim
`M & K Holdings, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd., 985 F.3d 1376
`(Fed. Cir. 2021) ..................................................................................... 51
`Sud-Chemie, Inc. v. Multisorb Techs., Inc., 554 F.3d 1001 (Fed. Cir.
`2009) ............................................................................................... 34, 61
`Venkat Konda v. Flex Logix Techs., Inc., No. 2022-1162, 2022 U.S.
`App. LEXIS 12248 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2022) .............................................. 16
`Worlds Inc. v. Bungie, Inc., 903 F.3d 1237 (Fed. Cir. 2018).............................. 73
`Statutes
`35 U.S.C. §102 ...................................................................................1, 15-16
`35 U.S.C. §103 ............................................................................................. 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Exhibit #
`
`Petitioner’s Exhibit List
`Description
`
`1001
`1002
`1003
`1004
`1005
`
`1006
`1007
`1008
`1009
`
`1010
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502 (“the ’502 Patent”)
`Prosecution history of the ’502 Patent (“File History”)
`Declaration of Petitioner’s Expert, Dr. Zygmunt J. Haas
`U.S. Provisional Application 62/334,418 to Lee (“Lee”)
`OPPO, Discussion on SI Request Prohibit Timer, 3GPP TSG-RAN
`WG2#101, R2-1801795, Athens, Greece, (Feb. 26 – Mar. 2, 2018),
`(“Oppo”)
`U.S. Publication No. 2017/0332372 (“the ’372 Pub.”)
`U.S. Patent 9,832,686 to Belghoul
`Declaration of Friedhelm Rodermund
`3GPP Partners, available at https://www.3gpp.org/about-us/partners
`
`3GPP Working Procedures, 20 October 2016
`Introducing 3GPP, available at https://www.3gpp.org/about-
`us/introducing-3gpp
`
`3GPP Membership database, identifying individual members from “all
`partners”, report available at
`https://webapp.etsi.org/3gppmembership/Results.asp?Member=ALL_P
`ARTNERS&SortMember=Name&DirMember=ASC&SortPartner=Na
`me&DirPartner=ASC&SortMarket=Name&DirMarket=ASC&SortOb
`server=Name&DirObserver=ASC&SortGuest=Name&DirGuest=ASC
`&Name=&search=Search
`
`3GPP RAN2 – Radio Layer 2 and Radio Layer 3 RRC, available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/3gpp-groups/radio-access-networks-ran/ran-
`wg2
`3GPP Specifications for Working Group RAN2, available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport?code=TSG-WG--R2.htm
`
`
`
`
`
`v
`
`

`

`Exhibit #
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`1017
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Description
`
`Ericsson Post, LTE-NR tight-interworking and the first steps to 5G
`(Nov. 21, 2017), available at
`https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2017/11/lte-nr-tight-interworking-
`and-the-first-steps-to-5g
`
`3GPP 4th Generation (LTE), available at
`https://www.etsi.org/technologies/mobile/4G
`
`3GPP 5th Generation, available at
`https://www.etsi.org/technologies/mobile/5g
`
`J. Baron, Unpacking 3GPP standards, March 24, 2015, available at
`https://wwws.law.northwestern.edu/research-
`faculty/clbe/innovationeconomics/documents/baron_gupta_unpacking
`_3gpp_standards.pdf
`5G NR RRC Procedure and Its States (Nov. 19, 2017), available at
`https://www.techplayon.com/5g-nr-rrc-procedure-states/
`
`3GPP TR 21.905 v15.0.0 (2018-03), Vocabulary for 3GPP
`Specifications (Release 15), available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=558 (“Versions” tab, link “15.0.0” uploaded
`April 1, 2018)
`
`3GPP TS 23.501 v15.1.0 (2018-03), System Architecture for the 5G
`System; Stage 2 (Release 15), available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=3144 (“Versions” tab, link “15.1.0”
`uploaded March 28, 2018)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vi
`
`

`

`Exhibit #
`
`1022
`
`1023
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Description
`
`3GPP TS 36.300 v15.0.0 (2017-12), Evolved Universal Terrestrial
`Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio
`Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; Stage 2 (Release
`15), available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=2430 (“Versions” tab, link “15.0.0”
`uploaded January 7, 2018)
`
`3GPP TS 36.304 v14.5.0 (2017-12), Evolved Universal Terrestrial
`Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) procedures in idle
`mode, available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=2432 (“Versions” tab, link “14.5.0”
`uploaded January 7, 2018)
`
`3GPP TS 36.331 v14.5.1 (2018-01), Evolved Universal Terrestrial
`Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC) Protocol
`Specification (Release 14), (“4G RRC Specification”), available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=2440 (“Versions” tab, link “14.5.1”
`uploaded January 9, 2018)
`
`3GPP TS 38.300 v15.0.0 (2017-12), NR; NR and NG-RAN Overall
`description; Stage 2 (Release 15), available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=3191 (“Versions” tab, link “15.0.0”
`uploaded January 4, 2018)
`
`3GPP TS 38.331 v15.0.0 (2017-12), NR Radio Resource Control
`(RRC) protocol specification (Release 15), (“5G RRC Specification”),
`available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=3197 (“Versions” tab, link “15.0.0”
`uploaded January 4, 2018)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vii
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Description
`
`3GPP TS 38.401 v15.0.0 (2017-12), NG-RAN; Architecture
`description,” available at
`https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDe
`tails.aspx?specificationId=3219 (“Versions” tab, link “15.0.0”
`uploaded January 19, 2018)
`
`3GPP Meetings for Group RAN2
`
`https://www.3gpp.org/dynareport?code=Meetings-R2.htm#R2-101
`
`3GPP FTP page for the 101st meeting of RAN2 WG, held Feb. 26-
`2018 to March 2, 2018, available at
`
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/
`3GPP RAN2#101 Meeting Information page, available at
`
`https://portal.3gpp.org/Meetings.aspx#/meeting?MtgId=18770
`3GPP FTP page publishing each technical contribution associated with
`the RAN2#101 meeting of RAN2 WG, held Feb. 26-2018 to March 2,
`2018, available at
`
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Docs
`RAN2#101 Documents Index - 3GPP index of the technical
`contributions associated with the RAN2#101 meeting of RAN2 WG
`(last modified March 2, 2018), available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Tdoclis
`ts (uploaded March 2, 2018).
`Filtered RAN2#101 Documents Index – Filtered version of 3GPP index
`of the technical contributions associated with the RAN2#101 meeting
`of RAN2 WG (last modified March 2, 2018), available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Tdoclis
`ts (uploaded March 2, 2018) (filtered to documents indexed to “On
`demand system information”).
`RAN2#101 Agenda - 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #101 Agenda
`(R2-1801700), available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Docs
`(link “R2-1801700.zip”)
`
`viii
`
`Exhibit #
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`1034
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Description
`
`RAN2#101 Report - Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG2 meeting #101
`Athens, Greece, 26 February - 2 March, 2018, available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Report
`
`RAN2#101 Report TDoc_List - TDoc-list attached to RAN2#101
`Report, available at
`https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/TSG_RAN/WG2_RL2/TSGR2_101/Report
`
`Docket excerpts showing dismissals in Togail Technologies Ltd.
`litigations against Motorola Mobility LLC, N.D. Ill. Case No. 1:22-cv-
`02176; Google LLC, W.D. Tex. Case No. 6:22-cv-00327; and
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., W.D. Tex. Case No. 6:22-cv-00328.
`Docket for Togail Technologies Ltd. v. Apple Inc., W.D. Tex. Case No.
`6:22-cv-00326 (“Apple case”).
`Scheduling Order, Dkt. 33 in Apple case
`First Amended Complaint in Apple case
`Median Time to Trial Statistics - Judicial Caseload Profile –Western
`District of Texas, Northern District of California, and Eastern District
`of Texas excerpted from:
`https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/fcms_na_distprofile0630.2
`022_0.pdf
`
`Decl. of K. Jakel
`ETSI 3GPP page, available at https://www.etsi.org/committee/3gpp
`Complaint in Togail Technologies Ltd. v. TCL Technology Group,
`Corp. et al., ED. Tex. Case No. 2:23-cv-00039 (“TCL case”).
`
`ix
`
`Exhibit #
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`1040
`1041
`
`1042
`1043
`1044
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`I.
`
`OVERVIEW
`Unified Patents, LLC (“Unified” or “Petitioner”) requests inter partes review
`
`of Claims 1, 4-7, 11, 14-17 (the “Challenged Claims”) of U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`(“the ’502 Patent, Ex-1001) under AIA 35 U.S.C. §103 and §102 based on the
`
`following grounds:1
`
`Ground
`
`Claims
`
`Challenge
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`
`
`1, 4-7, 11, 14-17
`1, 4-7, 11, 14-17
`1
`
`Obvious over Lee (Ex-1004)
`Obvious over Oppo (Ex-1005)
`Anticipated by Oppo
`
`On information and belief, the ’502 Patent is owned by Togail Technologies,
`
`Ltd. (“Togail” or “Patent Owner”).
`
`
`
`II. GROUNDS FOR STANDING
`Petitioner certifies that the Challenged Patent is available for inter partes
`
`review and that Petitioner is not barred or estopped from requesting this review. 37
`
`C.F.R. §42.104(a). This Petition is filed under 37 C.F.R. §42.106(a).
`
`
`1 Lee and Oppo each qualify as prior art to the ’502 Patent under at least AIA 35
`
`U.S.C. §102(a). Neither was cited nor discussed during examination. Ex-1001 (56);
`
`Ex-1002 (generally).
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`III. U.S. PATENT 10,791,502
`Summary
`A.
`The ’502 Patent discloses an “on-demand system information request
`
`procedure and the corresponding error handling procedure for the next generation
`
`wireless communication networks.” Ex-1001 1:40-43. While the ’502 Patent
`
`acknowledges that the pre-existing 5G new radio (NR) network had “on-demand
`
`system information (SI) request” procedures, the applicant believed that the
`
`procedures lacked “an efficient mechanism for error handling associated with the
`
`on-demand SI request procedure.” Ex-1001 1:23-36.
`
`The purportedly inventive error handling procedure involved storing failure
`
`information for an SI request: “The error handling procedure includes storing SI
`
`request failure information.” Ex-1001 Abstract; see also Ex-1001 1:40-62. 2 This
`
`purported invention, however, is not recited in the Challenged Claims, which are
`
`instead directed to an optional “prohibit timer” that prevents the user equipment
`
`(“UE”) from resending an SI request for a period of time:
`
`In one implementation, the error handling procedure may further
`include at least one of following: a prohibit timer activation, a cell
`re-selection procedure, and a re-establishment procedure.
`
`Ex-1001 15:51-62, see also 8:12-22 (similar).
`
`
`2 Unless otherwise stated, Petitioner added the bold font for emphasis.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`The specification states that the prohibit timer can be used in an “unconnected
`
`state” (Ex-1001 6:47-49, 7:50-60) and a “connected state” (id., 7:61-62, 8:12-22).
`
`While the specification does not explain what these states are, a POSA would have
`
`known them as the particular states of radio interface connectivity specified by the
`
`3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) standards body, as discussed below. Ex-
`
`1003 ¶37; Infra §III.F. Generally, UEs in an unconnected state had more limited
`
`radio resources established for communication, whereas the connected state
`
`established specific bi-directional, point-to-point bearer channels between the UE
`
`and the network. Id.
`
`Although
`
`the specification references a few differences in optional
`
`implementation details for the prohibit timer in the two states, the differences are not
`
`described as being particularly important. Compare Ex-1001 6:47-49, 7:7-26, 7:50-
`
`60 (prohibit timer in the unconnected state) with id. 7:61-62, 8:12-22 (prohibit timer
`
`in the connected state). The prohibit timer is not shown in the ’502 Patent’s figures,
`
`which are instead directed to the storing of failure information:
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`
`
`Ex-1001 Fig. 6.
`
`Prosecution History
`B.
`The ’502 Patent issued from U.S. Application 16/372,389, filed on April 1,
`
`2019, and claims priority to Provisional Application 62/651,312, filed on April 2,
`
`2018. Ex-1001 Cover, 1:8-14. The Examiner allowed the application after the
`
`applicant amended the claims to replace the failure storage feature with the prohibit
`
`timer:
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Ex-1002 244.
`
`The applicant argued that the art of record did not disclose a prohibit timer or
`
`the connected state (Ex-1002 251), and the Examiner allowed the claims (Ex-1002
`
`
`
`221).
`
`As explained below, the references of the Grounds of this Petition––which
`
`were not cited or relied upon during prosecution of the ’502 Patent––disclosed the
`
`limitations allegedly missing from the art.
`
`C. Claim Construction
`Each claim term in the Challenged Claims should be given its plain and
`
`ordinary meaning. No specific construction of any claim term is required, because
`
`the prior art herein meets each of the claim terms under any reasonable construction.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`Priority of the Challenged Claims
`D.
`This Petition relies on prior art as of the earliest claimed priority date of the
`
`’502 Patent (April 2, 2018), hereafter “Priority Date.” Ex-1001 Cover; §III.B.
`
`Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art (POSA)
`E.
`A POSA in April 2018 would have had at least (1) a Bachelor’s degree in
`
`electrical engineering or a similar degree and (2) at least two years of professional
`
`experience with cellular wireless communications, including the 3GPP radio
`
`interface architecture and protocols for 4th and 5th Generation cellular wireless
`
`systems. Ex-1003 ¶48. More experience can supplement for less education and vice
`
`versa. Id. The level of skill in the art is further demonstrated by the references cited
`
`herein, including the Grounds’ references and the background references discussed
`
`in the State of the Art section below. While this petition or accompanying expert
`
`testimony may occasionally use the present tense, the analysis is from the
`
`perspective of a POSA as of the Priority Date.
`
`State of the Art
`F.
`This section describes and informs the general knowledge, skill, common
`
`sense, and creativity possessed by a POSA as of the Priority Date. Ex-1003 ¶¶50-
`
`67.
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`3GPP
`1.
`A POSA was well aware of standards development of cellular technology by
`
`the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), including 3GPP’s Technical
`
`Specifications (TS’s, e.g., TS-38.331 (Ex-1026)) and technical contributions (e.g.,
`
`Oppo (Ex-1005)). Ex-1003 ¶51; Ex-1009. 3GPP is responsible for the 4th
`
`Generation (4G) (e.g., Evolved-Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA)/Long
`
`Term Evolution (LTE)) and 5th Generation (5G) (e.g., the New Radio (NR))
`
`standards. Ex-1015; Ex-1017; Ex-1011 (e.g., “With LTE and 5G work, 3GPP has
`
`become the focal point for the vast majority of mobile systems beyond 3G.”); Ex-
`
`1043 (3GPP coordinates “some 140 meetings per year handling 100,000
`
`contribution documents.”); Ex-1012 (over 800 individual members, including the
`
`likes of Apple, Samsung, Ericsson, Nokia). Ex-1003 ¶¶51-55.
`
`A POSA was well aware that 3GPP develops its Technical Specifications (TS)
`
`in working groups (WG) organized by subject matter, in which delegates from
`
`industry members are tasked with preparing and considering proposals for the next
`
`version of a TS, including technological proposals for the information, discussion
`
`and approval of the WG. Ex-1010; Baron (Ex-1018) 014; Ex-1003 ¶53.
`
`The general knowledge of a POSA included the 4G and 5G radio access
`
`technologies in 3GPP technical specifications. See, e.g., Ex-1020 to Ex-1027; Ex-
`
`1003 ¶55. Of particular importance here were the specifications directed to Radio
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`Resource Control (RRC) (Ex-1024, Ex-1026) in the context of other RAN
`
`specifications (e.g., Ex-1022, Ex-1025, Ex-1023). Ex-1003 ¶55.
`
`The technical specifications were known and publicly accessible. Ex-1008
`
`¶¶21, 58-61. 3GPP maintained a database accessible via its 3GPP portal website,
`
`where current and historical versions of the 3GPP technical specifications were
`
`organized and available for download by anyone with access to the Internet.
`
`Rodermund
`
`Decl.
`
`(Ex-1008)
`
`¶¶36,
`
`58-61
`
`(explaining
`
`https://portal.3gpp.org/Specifications.aspx). For example, Ex-1024 to 1026 were
`
`publicly available on the 3GPP portal just before the Priority Date (Ex-1024 by
`
`January 9, 2018; Ex-1025 and 1026 by January 4, 2018). Ex-1008 ¶¶21, 58-61.
`
`2. Well Known 3GPP Concepts
`Radio Access Network
`a.
`It was well known to a POSA that user equipment (UE) (e.g., a mobile phone)
`
`communicated with the network via the Radio Access Network (RAN), specifically
`
`with base stations (BS) of the RAN. Ex-1003 ¶56.
`
`For example, the architecture of the 4G RAN (also called E-UTRAN or LTE)
`
`was well known to a POSA:
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`
`
`Ex-1022 Fig. 4-1, 27. A 4G base station is referred to as an “E-UTRAN NodeB” or
`
`simply “eNB.” Ex-1022 23, 27; Ex-1003 ¶57.
`
`The 5G RAN architecture was also well known, including that it was specified
`
`to use both New Radio (NR), i.e., 5G, and E-UTRA, i.e., 4G, technology:
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`
`Ex-1025 Fig. 4.1-1, 10; Ex-1003 ¶58. In the 5G RAN, a “gNB” base station
`
`provided a UE with 5G wireless connectivity, and an “ng-eNB” base station
`
`provided the UE with 4G wireless connectivity, to the 5G core network (“5GC”).
`
`Ex-1003 ¶59; Ex-1025 9-10, 16. Thus, it was well known to a POSA that some
`
`aspects of 4G would continue to be relied upon in 5G. Id. Id.
`
`b. Radio Resource Control (RRC)
`It was well known to a POSA that the UE-to-RAN radio interface was
`
`governed by 3GPP’s Radio Resource Control (RRC) protocols. Ex-1003 ¶60; Ex-
`
`1024; Ex-1026 §§1, 4.1; Ex-1015 (“RRC refers to the signaling language spoken
`
`and associated behaviors undertaken between the network and a mobile device.”).
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`RRC STATES – IDLE, INACTIVE, CONNECTED
`c.
`It was well known to a POSA that 3GPP specified an RRC state machine for
`
`UEs that depended on the UE’s state of radio interface connectivity with the RAN.
`
`Ex-1003 ¶61; Ex-1024 30-31; Ex-1026 12-14; Ex-1019. For example, a UE
`
`operating 4G (E-UTRA) was either in an “RRC_ IDLE” or “RRC_CONNECTED”
`
`state, depending on whether an “RRC connection” with the RAN was established:
`
`
`Ex-1024 31 Fig. 4.2.1-1 (reproduced in part). Ex-1003 ¶61.
`
`In RRC_IDLE, the UE had limited radio resources established for
`
`communicating with
`
`the RAN.
`
` Ex-1003 ¶62; Ex-1024 30.
`
` In
`
`the
`
`RRC_CONNECTED state, the RRC connection supported bidirectional, point-to-
`
`point communication between the UE and RAN. Ex-1003 ¶62; Ex-1024 30-31.
`
`5G added a third state, RRC_INACTIVE:
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`
`
`Ex-1026 Fig. 4.2.2-1, 13. The RRC_IDLE and RRC_CONNECTED states are
`
`similar to 4G. Ex-1003 ¶63; Ex-1026 12-13.
`
`d. RRC’s System Information Acquisition
`It was well known to a POSA that 3GPP UEs acquired specific system
`
`information (“SI”) necessary for connectivity. Ex-1024 §5.2.2 (“System
`
`Information Acquisition”); Ex-1026 16-21, §5.2.2; Ex-1003 ¶64.
`
`
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`
`
`
`Ex-1024 41 (Fig. 5.2.2.1-1); see also Ex-1026 17, Fig. 5.2.2.1-1. As part of SI
`
`acquisition, the UE monitored SI messages broadcast from the network. Id. For
`
`example, in RRC_CONNECTED, the UE “shall ensure having a valid version of (at
`
`least) the MasterInformationBlock, SystemInformationBlockType1 as well as
`
`SystemInformationBlockTypeX (depending on support of mobility towards the
`
`concerned RATs).” Ex-1026 17. 4G defined some 22 different SIBs,
`
`SystemInformationBlockType1 to SystemInformationBlockType22-NB. Ex-1024 46-
`
`56, 261-262, 321-355; Ex-1026 16, §5.2.1, 64-65 (SIB1); Ex-1025 31-32.
`
`“On-demand” System Information
`e.
`It was well known to a POSA that the SI acquisition procedures of 4G were
`
`being augmented in 5G with an “on-demand” option, in which the UE sent a “system
`
`information request” to ask the network for SI when needed. Ex-1003 ¶65; Ex-1001
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`Abstract; Ex-1026 17, 20; Ex-1025 31-32. The new SI requests were reflected in
`
`3GPP specifications before the Priority Date, e.g.:
`
`
`
`
`
`TS 38.331 (Ex-1026) 17, Fig. 5.2.2.1-1 (annotated).
`
`TS 38.300 (Ex-1025) Fig. 7.3-1, 31-32 (annotated). Ex-1003 ¶65.
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`The 5G RRC Specification included a section titled “Request for on demand
`
`system information,” detailing how SI would be “provided upon UE request.” Ex-
`
`1026 20. The on-demand SI procedures applied to all RRC states. Ex-1025 32.
`
`Further details were reflected in publicly available technical contributions, such as
`
`Oppo (Ex-1005) of Grounds 2 and 3, in connection with 3GPP work leading up to
`
`the Priority Date. Ex-1005; Ex-1013; Ex-1014; Ex-1029; Ex-1032; Ex-1033; Ex-
`
`1003 ¶67; see also Rodermund Decl. (Ex-1008) ¶¶20, 44-57. Thus, on-demand SI
`
`acquisition was well known to a POSA due to 3GPP standardization. Ex-1025; Ex-
`
`1026; Ex-1033; Ex-1003 ¶67.
`
`IV. THE CHALLENGED CLAIMS ARE UNPATENTABLE
`A. Ground 1: Claims 1, 4-7, 11, 14-17 Are Obvious Over Lee
`Lee
`1.
`Lee Is Pertinent, Analogous Prior Art
`a.
`U.S. provisional application 62/334,418 to Lee (“Lee”) was filed on May 10,
`
`2016, describing an “On-Demand Delivery of System Information with RAN [Radio
`
`Access Network] Based Polling.” Ex-1004 001-002. 3 Lee is prior art under AIA 35
`
`
`3 Citations herein to Lee begin with the three digit pagination of Petitioner’s exhibit
`
`label, followed by Lee’s specific identifiers (e.g. section or paragraph numbers), if
`
`present.
`
`
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as of the publication on November 16, 2017 of U.S. patent
`
`application publication 2017/0332372 (“the ’372 Pub.”), which claimed priority to
`
`Lee and incorporated it by reference in its entirety. Ex-1006 [0001]; MPEP §901.02
`
`(Subject matter ... available to the public under 37 C.F.R. 1.14 may be used as prior
`
`art ... under ... 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as of the date the subject matter became publicly
`
`available.”); 37 C.F.R. §1.14(a)(1)(iv); Venkat Konda v. Flex Logix Techs., Inc., No.
`
`2022-1162, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 12248, at *9 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2022) (affirming
`
`Board and holding provisional application became printed publication reference as
`
`of date of publication of incorporating PCT); Flex Logix Techs Inc. v Venkat Konda,
`
`PGR2019-00042, Paper 35 (Final Written Decision), (Mar. 16, 2021), at 17-18, 18
`
`n.7, 29. Here, because the entirety of the Lee provisional became accessible to any
`
`interested member of the public on November 16, 2017, Lee became a printed
`
`publication as of that date. Id.; 37 CFR §1.14(a)(1)(iv).
`
`Lee is analogous art to the ’502 Patent. Ex-1003 ¶69. For example, the field
`
`of endeavor of the ’502 Patent “generally relates to wireless communication, and
`
`more particularly, to the on-demand system information (SI) request procedure for
`
`the next generation wireless communication networks.” Ex-1001 1:17-20. Lee is in
`
`the same field of endeavor, “on-demand delivery of system information” (Ex-1004
`
`013), for not only 4G radio access technology (i.e., “LTE”, “eNB”), but also
`
`subsequent generations, i.e., 5G radio access technology (RAT): “In the inventions,
`
`
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`RAN is LTE base station i.e. eNB or replaced by a New RAT.” Ex-1004 046; Ex-
`
`1003 ¶69. Lee is also reasonably pertinent to at least one problem addressed by the
`
`’502 Patent, namely “that when UE frequently requests system information, uplink
`
`is congested.” Ex-1004 045; Ex-1003 ¶69. Indeed, as discussed below, Lee
`
`described the same solution––a prohibit timer. Ex-1003 ¶69.
`
`b. Overview of Lee
`Lee taught on-demand SI acquisition improvements to 3GPP’s Radio
`
`Resource Control (RRC) protocols. Ex-1003 ¶70. As background on “Prior Art,”
`
`Lee reproduced extensive material from TS 36.331, the 4G RRC Protocol
`
`Specification. Compare Ex-1004 014-45 with Ex-1024 35-84.
`
`Lee taught using a prohibit timer as part of an on-demand SI procedure:
`
`Prohibit Timer
`
`Ex-1004 049 (annotated), Title (“On-Demand Delivery of System Information”).
`
`Lee’s prohibit timer limited the UE’s ability to send repeated on-demand SI
`
`
`
`requests:
`
`
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`SI request when UE detects that any essential (i.e. required) SIB
`[System Information Block] is missing at a cell
`
`If a cell does not broadcast essential SIBs which UE needs to acquire
`at a cell, the SI request from a UE may alternatively indicate to RAN
`that essential SIBs are missing...
`
`After sending the SI request at a cell, UE starts a timer. If UE does
`not receive the essential SIBs at the cell until the timer expires, UE
`considers the cell as barred, or UE re-sends the SI request to RAN at
`the cell after the timer expires.
`
`Ex-1004 049. The timer prevented uplink congestion by prohibiting frequent UE SI
`
`requests. Ex-1004 045.
`
`Because a POSA would have understood Lee’s invention was disclosed with
`
`reference to the 3GPP 4G and 5G standards (Ex-1004 e.g. 014-45, 051-60, 046 “In
`
`the inventions, RAN is LTE base station i.e. eNB or replaced by a New RAT.”), a
`
`POSA would have understood the terms, phrases and natural consequences of Lee’s
`
`disclosure in the context of those 3GPP standards, as detailed below. Ex-1003 ¶70.
`
`2.
`
`Detailed Application to the Challenged Claims
`Claim 1
`a.
`[1Pre] A method of an on-demand system information (SI) request procedure
`performed by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising:
`To the extent limiting, Lee disclosed or at least rendered obvious the preamble,
`
`[Pre], as explained below. Ex-1003 ¶¶73-76.
`
`
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`First, Lee taught a method of an on-demand system information (SI) request
`
`procedure. For example, Lee taught that a UE may request SI information if the
`
`“UE detects that any essential (i.e., required) SIB [System Information Block] is
`
`missing at a cell,” explaining:
`
`If a cell does not broadcast essential SIBs which UE needs to acquire
`at a cell, the SI request from a UE may alternatively indicate to RAN
`[i.e., Radio Access Network] that essential SIBs are missing. Upon
`receiving the SI request, RAN sends the essential SIBs that are not
`broadcast to the UE.
`
`Ex-1004 049. Lee illustrated the SI request procedure:
`
`
`
`Ex-1004 049.
`
`Lee’s procedure was on-demand because the UE was permitted to ask the
`
`network for particular SI, when needed. Ex-1004 045-046, 049-050; Ex-1003 ¶75.
`
`For example, Lee disclosed that a “UE may request system information at a cell.
`
`Then, when the network receives this request, the network sends system information
`
`
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`IPR2023-00338, Petition
`U.S. Patent 10,791,502
`to the UE.” Ex-1004 045. Indeed, Lee was expressly directed to “On-Demand
`
`Delivery of System Information.” Ex-1004 Title, see also 014, 045-046, 049-059;
`
`Ex-1003 ¶75. In fact, by the Priority Date, a POSA would have recognized that
`
`Lee’s disclosure was directed to “on demand system information acquisition”––a
`
`3GPP concept known from development of the 5G standard. Ex-1003 ¶75;
`
`§III.F.2.d-e, supra (discussing TS 38.331 (Ex-1026) 20 (“§5.2.2.3.3 Request for on
`
`demand system information”), TS 38.300 (Ex-1025) 31-32 (discussing on-demand
`
`SI request procedures for 5G)); cf. Ex-1001 1:23-34 (admi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket