throbber
Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 1 of 37 PageID #: 440
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 22-677-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`)))))))))
`
`EQUIL IP HOLDINGS LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff Equil IP Holdings LLC
`
`(“Equil IP”) files this First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement against Akamai
`
`Technologies, Inc. (“Akamai”). This First Amended Complaint supersedes the initial complaint
`
`filed on May 24, 2022 (D.I. 1). Equil IP states the following:
`
`NATURE OF THIS ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a civil action for the infringement of the following United States patents
`
`(the “Asserted Patents”) as described herein:
`
` U.S. Patent No. 8,495,242 (“Automated media delivery system”), issued on July 23,
`
`2013 (the “’242 Patent”);
`
` U.S. Patent No. 9,158,745 (“Optimization of media content using generated
`
`intermediate media content”), issued on October 13, 2015 (the “’745 Patent”); and
`
` U.S. Patent No. 6,792,575 (“Automated processing and delivery of media to web
`
`servers”), issued on September 14, 2004 (the “’575 Patent”).
`
`2.
`
`The Asserted Patents are members of a family that also includes U.S. Patent
`
`No. 6,964,009 (“Automated media delivery system”), issued on November 8, 2005 (the “’009
`
`Patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 8,381,110 (“Automated media delivery system”), issued on
`
`Akamai Ex. 1016
`Akamai Techs. v. Equil IP Holdings
`IPR2023-00330
`Page 00001
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 2 of 37 PageID #: 441
`
`February 19, 2013 (the “’110 Patent”) (collectively with the Asserted Patents, the “Equilibrium
`
`Patents”).
`
`3.
`
`The Equilibrium Patents disclose revolutionary innovations regarding how rich-
`
`media content such as images and videos can be optimized and rapidly delivered to Internet-
`
`connected devices such as phones and computers.
`
`PARTIES
`
`4.
`
`Plaintiff Equil IP is a limited liability company duly organized and existing under
`
`the laws of Delaware having its principal place of business at 500 Tamal Plaza, Suite 528, Corte
`
`Madera, CA 94925. Equil IP is the owner by assignment of the Equilibrium Patents.
`
`5.
`
`With respect to the Equilibrium Patents, Equil IP is the successor-in-interest to
`
`Automated Media Processing Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Equilibrium (“Equilibrium”), a corporation
`
`duly organized and existing under the laws of Delaware having its principal place of business at
`
`500 Tamal Plaza, Suite 528, Corte Madera, CA 94925.
`
`6.
`
`Equilibrium is an industry pioneer and leader in developing patented automated
`
`media processing solutions to help its customers manage, modify, and efficiently deploy media-
`
`rich content such as images, video, and sound optimized for delivery over the Internet and
`
`customized for use on Internet-connected end-user devices such as desktop and laptop computers
`
`and mobile phones.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, Akamai is a corporation organized and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware, with its corporate headquarters and a principal place of
`
`business at 145 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142.
`
`- 2 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00002
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 3 of 37 PageID #: 442
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`8.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1 et seq. Accordingly, this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`1338(a).
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Akamai, as Delaware is Akamai’s state
`
`of incorporation, and Akamai therefore resides in Delaware. Akamai has also derived revenue
`
`from its infringing acts within this District.
`
`10.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(b), as
`
`Delaware is Akamai’s state of incorporation, and Akamai therefore resides in Delaware.
`
`THE EQUILIBRIUM PATENTS AND “MEDIARICH SERVER”
`
`11.
`
`The technology at issue in this suit traces its roots to the early 1990s when
`
`Equilibrium, founded by Sean Barger,1 acquired and further developed a software product called
`
`“DeBabelizer.” Sold starting in the early 1990s to industry power-users and consumers alike,
`
`DeBabelizer enabled users to automatically edit (“batch process”) collections of graphic images,
`
`animation, and video across over fifty different file types. It was powerful software, the full
`
`version of which sold for hundreds of dollars. The name “DeBabelizer” referred to the program’s
`
`ability to import and normalize any format, then systematically edit a wide variety of otherwise
`
`incompatible media file types and then export them to any format automatically. After selling
`
`over 1 million copies of DeBabelizer Lite and DeBabelizer Pro for Macintosh, Windows OS’s
`
`and Silicon Graphics, Equilibrium believed a logical expansion of the franchise was to develop a
`
`way to deliver high-speed, dynamic content through a system tied directly into web servers. The
`
`1 Equilibrium was originally formed to develop computer games.
`
`- 3 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00003
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 4 of 37 PageID #: 443
`
`team set out to build a next-generation technology which solved the automatic rendition
`
`management problem to enable Web 2.0 for scaling any size website while providing unique
`
`device support without having to pre-process content for all viewing scenarios. They called the
`
`project “Freeride.”
`
`12. With the growth of the web in the late 1990s, Equilibrium foresaw the Freeride
`
`project developing a new kind of Internet-based service that web developers could use to
`
`simplify the process of optimizing and maintaining rich media content automatically on
`
`websites. Equilibrium envisioned a system that would enable next-generation ecommerce and
`
`other applications.
`
`13.
`
`On October 21, 1999, in order to protect this system, Equilibrium filed the first in
`
`a series of U.S. patent applications that would ultimately issue as the Equilibrium Patents. All
`
`the Equilibrium Patents are members of the same family and share substantially similar
`
`disclosures.
`
`14.
`
`That first application (Application No. 09/425,326) issued as the ’575 Patent on
`
`September 14, 2004. A copy of the ’575 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`15.
`
`On August 16, 2000, Equilibrium filed Provisional Application No. 60/226,043,
`
`and on August 14, 2001, it filed Continuation-in-Part Application No. 09/929,904, which issued
`
`as the ’009 Patent on November 8, 2005. A copy of the ’009 Patent is attached as Exhibit B.
`
`16.
`
`On September 26, 2008, Equilibrium filed Divisional Application No.
`
`12/238,842, which issued as the ’110 Patent on February 19, 2013. A copy of the ’110 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit C.
`
`- 4 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00004
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 5 of 37 PageID #: 444
`
`17.
`
`On February 26, 2010, Equilibrium filed Divisional Application No. 12/713,637,
`
`which issued as the ’242 Patent on July 23, 2013. A copy of the ’242 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit D.
`
`18.
`
`On July 15, 2008, Equilibrium filed Divisional Application No. 12/173,747,
`
`which issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,656,046 on February 18, 2014. A copy of the ’046 Patent is
`
`attached as Exhibit E.
`
`19.
`
`On January 28, 2013, Equilibrium filed Continuation Application No. 13/752,110,
`
`which issued as the ’745 Patent on October 13, 2015. A copy of the ’745 Patent is attached as
`
`Exhibit F.
`
`20.
`
`On December 17, 2021, Equilibrium assigned the Equilibrium Patents to Equil IP
`
`Holdings LLC.
`
`21.
`
`The Equilibrium Patents individually and collectively disclose substantial
`
`improvements to then-existing systems of Internet media delivery. Existing systems did not
`
`enable on-the-fly rich media generation and caching of rich media that was optimized for each
`
`user. In the novel methods described in the Equilibrium Patents, each user’s request contains
`
`information identifying the requested media and further indicating incremental optimizations that
`
`are performed prior to delivery to the user. The incrementally optimized media is cached for
`
`future delivery if another user request is received containing information requesting the same
`
`media and indicating the same incremental optimizations.
`
`22.
`
`The technology disclosed in the Equilibrium Patents is widely used today to
`
`power the intelligent edge networks that content providers rely on to deliver media-rich Internet
`
`web pages and videos quickly and with very high quality. Without the innovations of the
`
`Equilibrium Patents, media-rich Internet content would be much slower to deliver and of lower
`
`- 5 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00005
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 6 of 37 PageID #: 445
`
`quality and/or would require expensive investments in computing and network infrastructure.
`
`The Equilibrium Patents therefore disclose substantial improvements to computer and network
`
`technology. Those improvements were not well-understood, routine, or conventional in the
`
`“Web 1.0” computing and network environment that existed at the time they were filed.
`
`23.
`
`The Equilibrium Patents have been widely cited, including by Akamai.
`
`According to Google Patents, the ’575 Patent has been cited more than 200 times by other U.S.
`
`patents and patent applications. Among those citations to the Equilibrium Patents are more than
`
`twenty patents and patent applications — from multiple patent families directed to numerous
`
`aspects of a content delivery network — that are identified as assigned to Akamai. (See, e.g.,
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 7,653,706 (“Dynamic image delivery system”); 7,725,602 (“Domain name
`
`resolution using a distributed DNS network”); 7,912,978 (“Method for determining metrics of a
`
`content delivery and global traffic management network”); 7,996,533 (“HTML delivery from
`
`edge-of-network servers in a content delivery network (CDN)”); 8,805,965 (“Methods and
`
`apparatus for image delivery”); 9,418,353 (“Methods and systems for delivering content to
`
`differentiated client devices”); 9,419,852 (“Systems and methods for identifying and
`
`characterizing client devices”); 9,509,804 (“Scalable content delivery network request handling
`
`mechanism to support a request processing layer”); 9,544,183 (“Methods and apparatus for
`
`providing content delivery instructions to a content server”); 9,654,579 (“Scalable content
`
`delivery network request handling mechanism”); 9,742,858 (“Assessment of content delivery
`
`services using performance measurements from within an end user client application”); and
`
`9,817,916 (“Methods and apparatus for accelerating content authored for multiple devices”).) In
`
`several cases, the ’575 Patent was the basis for a rejection by an examiner. (See, e.g., U.S.
`
`Application Nos. 11/009,273; 11/768,935; and 12/693,413.)
`
`- 6 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00006
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 7 of 37 PageID #: 446
`
`24.
`
`The technology disclosed and claimed in the Equilibrium Patents was released by
`
`Equilibrium in 2000 as the “MediaRich Server.” Since that time, Equilibrium has continuously
`
`offered MediaRich Server services in the business-to-business market. Recent clients include
`
`Walmart, the Walt Disney Company, Sony Pictures, Warner Bros., The Metropolitan Museum of
`
`Art, the U.S. Department of Energy, and E. T. Browne Drug Co. These companies use services
`
`powered by Equilibrium technology to automatically process, manage, and serve rich media
`
`content to websites and mobile devices.
`
`25.
`
`The current version of one of the Equilibrium services that practice inventions
`
`disclosed in the Equilibrium Patents is MediaRich 6. (See, e.g., Ex. G (“MediaRich 6
`
`Brochure”).)
`
`26.
`
`One aspect of the MediaRich Server — and the Equilibrium Patents that claim the
`
`technology that powers it — is the ability to optimize rich media on-the-fly and cache what
`
`Equilibrium calls media “renditions” in real time in response to Internet user requests. (See id.
`
`at 3.) As illustrated in the graphic below, users of a wide variety of devices (from web browsers
`
`on desktop computers to apps on mobile devices) send requests for media content to websites
`
`- 7 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00007
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 8 of 37 PageID #: 447
`
`and other network-hosted sources. Equilibrium’s service sits between those two parts of the
`
`network:
`
`27. MediaRich solves technical problems associated with delivering rich media
`
`content over the Internet that arise from the fact that each type of user device has different
`
`parameters that can be used to optimize media for viewing. Parameters like image size and
`
`resolution, compression type, compression level, frame rate, and many others can be used to
`
`optimize Internet media to make the most of each user’s type of device, specific application,
`
`quality, and quality of Internet service available at the moment, and other attributes. The
`
`MediaRich Server detects or is sent optimization parameters and optimizes the requested media
`
`on the fly before sending it on to the user.
`
`28.
`
`Once an optimized rendition is created, moreover, it is cached in the MediaRich
`
`Server. The next time any user is determined to have a need or request for the same media, the
`
`server checks the cache to see if a previously optimized rendition already exists. If it does, the
`
`pre-existing rendition is further optimized, if necessary, and sent. If not, a rendition can be made
`
`- 8 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00008
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 9 of 37 PageID #: 448
`
`from the original media, sent, and cached to be used as intermediate or final media for the next
`
`request. Over time, the library of renditions in the cache builds up, further improving the
`
`responsiveness of the system and thus improving user experience.
`
`THE AKAMAI “INTELLIGENT EDGE” NETWORK
`
`29. Mr. Barger has been an evangelist for the Equilibrium technology for many years.
`
`Equilibrium has partnered with industry-leading Internet companies to enhance their services
`
`with Equilibrium technology. Among them is Akamai, a leading Internet platform provider.
`
`Unfortunately, Akamai has elected over the years to become an “efficient infringer” by
`
`recreating Equilibrium’s patented service rather than continuing to partner with Equilibrium or
`
`licensing Equilibrium’s technology.
`
`30.
`
`On information and belief, Akamai was founded in the late 1990s to help solve
`
`the growing problem of Internet latency by offering Content Delivery Network (CDN) services.
`
`A CDN is a network of computers located at geographically dispersed data centers. The CDN
`
`network computers replicate and store website information so that it is available at physical
`
`locations closer to users who might access the website. On information and belief, at the time of
`
`its founding, Akamai’s network replicated website data and distributed it throughout the network
`
`to pre-position it closer to users, rather than generate optimized content on the fly.
`
`31.
`
`In February 2000, Equilibrium reached out to Akamai to explore options for
`
`integrating Equilibrium’s MediaRich technology with Akamai’s CDN service. Equilibrium
`
`explained:
`
`Equilibrium’s next generation product building on our 10 years of automated
`media processing experience, patent pending, is something that is a natural
`extension to the Akamai network . . . . It is aimed at content and media servers,
`integrates with existing server/database environments and dynamically generates
`media and content to the webserver cache on-the-fly. The system handles images,
`animation, digital video and sound currently, and has been architected to handle
`
`- 9 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00009
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 10 of 37 PageID #: 449
`
`any media type . . . . It . . . handles media cache management for web servers and
`creation/delivery of media to handheld/wireless devices automatically so that the
`web designer doesn’t have to integrate with proxy server systems or create
`multiple sites.
`
`32.
`
`Akamai’s then Chief Operating Officer (and future Chief Executive Officer) Paul
`
`Segan responded, directing his staff to reach out to Equilibrium “to learn more about Equilibrium
`
`and to assess how Akamai might become involved with [Equilibrium].”
`
`33. Mr. Barger and others from Equilibrium met with three Akamai Director-level
`
`executives and its principal engineer four days later. Contemporaneous memoranda indicate that
`
`Akamai “saw a clear synergy between Equilibrium’s media serving technology and Akamai’s
`
`data distribution system and expressed interest in further exploring possibilities for integration of
`
`the two technologies.”
`
`34.
`
`Akamai’s Principal Engineer James Kistler expressed skepticism about whether
`
`original media could be brought to the edge of the network for dynamic image generation.
`
`Akamai’s Director of Business Development Ravi Sundararajan suggested that the Equilibrium
`
`technology could be a good fit for a new initiative Akamai was then architecting called
`
`“EdgeAdvantage.” In this new system, Akamai suggested that Equilibrium’s media server could
`
`connect directly to Akamai’s caching servers closer to the edge of the network. Mr. Barger
`
`agreed that this would be a good approach.
`
`35.
`
`The parties also agreed to include Equilibrium in Akamai’s “Technology Partner
`
`Program.” The Akamai website described the “Technology Partner Program” as follows:
`
`Akamai Technology Partners work with Akamai to utilize Internet edge
`technology to create feature-enhanced products that enable customers to quickly
`and easily leverage Akamai's e-business infrastructure services and provide joint,
`industry-leading solutions for distributed content and application delivery.
`
`- 10 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00010
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 11 of 37 PageID #: 450
`
`Other partners included IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle. Equilibrium’s inclusion in this program
`
`made it easy for Akamai’s customers to use Equilibrium MediaRich services through the Akamai
`
`Content Delivery Network.
`
`36.
`
`Equilibrium’s inclusion in the Akamai “Technology Partner Program” was
`
`documented on the Akamai website, including, for example, in these December 9, 2004, Internet
`
`Archive captures:
`
`- 11 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00011
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 12 of 37 PageID #: 451
`
`Akamai stated that Equilibrium was a “recognized leader in automated imaging solutions.”
`
`Akamai further stated: “Equilibrium’s MediaRich is server-based software that automates image
`
`production and enables dynamic delivery of images anywhere. MediaRich brings true state-of-
`
`the-art automation tools to the Enterprise, allowing companies to create more engaging customer
`
`experiences while reducing production time and costs.”
`
`37.
`
`However, Akamai resisted Equilibrium’s offers to establish a more extensive
`
`partnership or more complete integration of Equilibrium’s technology into Akamai’s edge
`
`network.
`
`38.
`
`Over the years, from time-to-time, Equilibrium and Akamai would discuss
`
`whether an integrated product offering would be appropriate. For example, when John Bishop
`
`joined Akamai from Cisco in 2014 to become Akamai’s Chief Technology Officer, Mr. Barger
`
`met with him at an industry conference in Las Vegas. The pair later exchanged messages.
`
`Mr. Barger proposed that they should discuss opportunities for further integration of the two
`
`- 12 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00012
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 13 of 37 PageID #: 452
`
`companies’ products. Mr. Bishop told Mr. Barger that he was just settling in and wanted to get
`
`the “lay of the land” before continuing discussions. The discussions never resumed, however.
`
`39.
`
`A little over two years later, Akamai announced it had developed a “new image
`
`management service” that it called “Image Manager.” Just like Equilibrium’s MediaRich
`
`service, Akamai’s Image Manager promised to “engage online audiences with attractive images
`
`that are automatically optimized for both maximum visual quality and performance while
`
`reducing the cost and effort to transform and deliver web-ready images.” Image Manager
`
`promised “[f]aster sites and apps on any device, anywhere by reducing bytes delivered to web
`
`and mobile users.”
`
`40.
`
`Image Manager was one of Akamai’s “key offerings.” In its 2016 Annual Report,
`
`in a section entitled “Web and Mobile Performance Solutions,” Akamai stated:
`
`The ultimate goal of our web and mobile performance business is to make
`dynamic websites and applications have instant response times, no matter where
`the user is, what device or browser they are using, or how they are connected to
`the Internet. This is accomplished through a variety of advanced technologies
`embedded into our platform, which can be thought of as a virtual Internet
`overlaying the real Internet.
`
`The report then identified several “key offerings” of its “virtual Internet,” including: “Image
`
`Manager – To help our customers cope with the multitude of devices used by their consumers
`
`and varying connection quality, Image Manager automatically optimizes online images for the
`
`best combination of size, quality, and file format suited for each image and device and offloads
`
`the artistic transformation of derivative assets to the cloud.”
`
`41.
`
`Just like MediaRich, Akamai’s Image Manager (today called “Image and Video
`
`Manager” or “IVM”) stores “one high-quality, pristine file” in a media repository as a “Non-
`
`Optimized” Asset. Data from the asset is transmitted to “Edge Nodes” of an “Edge Cach[e].”
`
`The cached data is transmitted for “Image and Video Optimization” that automatically adjusts
`
`- 13 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00013
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 14 of 37 PageID #: 453
`
`factors such as quality, compression, and dimension resizing, based on information received
`
`about the “user context, including browser, device types, and the quality level of the end user’s
`
`current network connection.” The optimized media is cached at the Edge Node and served as an
`
`“Optimized Asset” to end users.
`
`42.
`
`According to Akamai:
`
`[IVM] means developers no longer need to worry about setting image-level
`quality. By automatically optimizing images for maximum perceived quality with
`minimum image weight, the algorithm lets developers relax knowing that images
`will be delivered at a specified quality that’s optimal for end users.
`
`43.
`
`As a result, Akamai boasts that rich media content is “[o]ptimized for every
`
`visitor” and “simplified for developers.”
`
`44.
`
`IVM is just one example of an infringing Akamai service that replicates the
`
`features of Equilibrium’s MediaRich Server service. Other features of services that grew out of
`
`Akamai’s “EdgeAdvantage” to be part of Akamai’s “Intelligent Edge Platform” employ image
`
`- 14 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00014
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 15 of 37 PageID #: 454
`
`and video optimization methodologies infringing one or more of the method claims of the
`
`Equilibrium Patents. For the avoidance of doubt, Equil IP asserts that Akamai infringes only
`
`method claims of the Equilibrium Patents.
`
`EQUILIBRIUM’S PATENTED INVENTIONS
`
`45.
`
`In this First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Equil IP asserts three
`
`related patents. Generally speaking, the ’745 and ’242 Patents claim methods by which rich
`
`media content is optimized and delivered to users in response to user requests. The ’575 Patent,
`
`which was the first in the family to issue, relates to the process by which the rich media
`
`optimization system interacts with the HTML or other browser language code in which a website
`
`containing rich media is written and which the user’s browser decodes when viewing the
`
`website.
`
`46.
`
`The ’745 Patent is titled “Optimization of Media Content Using Generated
`
`Intermediate Media Content” and it issued on October 13, 2015. It claims priority to an
`
`application filed on October 21, 1999.
`
`47.
`
`The ’745 Patent claims an “automated graphics delivery system.” (Ex. F (’745
`
`Patent) at 5:1-5.) The disclosed invention improves on prior art web media delivery systems by
`
`providing media “[a]sset management, automatic image manipulation, automatic image
`
`conversion, automatic image upload, and automatic disk management.” (Id. at 8:8-13.) The
`
`automatic image optimization, delivery, and caching is done on demand and in real time in
`
`response to user requests. “Web media is generated only if requested by a client browser.” (Id.
`
`at 5:35.) This results in a “dynamic Web site wherein images are generated on demand from
`
`original assets, wherein only the original assets need to be updated.” (Id. at 5:11-14.)
`
`- 15 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00015
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 16 of 37 PageID #: 455
`
`48.
`
`Because images are optimized on demand in response to specific user requests,
`
`the media can be optimized to fit the specific needs of the individual user. For example, the
`
`system can optimize media throughput based on “current Web server traffic.” (Id. at 5:15-17.)
`
`Similarly, the system can factor “client connection speed” to determine “optimum quality and
`
`file size.” (Id. at 5:19-20.)
`
`49.
`
`In the Equilibrium System, once media has been optimized in response to a user
`
`request, it is stored in a cache. A “media creation subsystem” is employed to create the
`
`optimized image and then “store the results in the media cache database.” (Id. at 8:57-60.) Since
`
`this optimized media is automatically cached, “identical requests can be handled without
`
`regeneration of images.” (Id. at 5:24-25.)
`
`MARKING
`
`50.
`
`Equilibrium was not required to mark under 35 U.S.C. § 287 because its
`
`MediaRich service is a software system implementing patented methods that lacks a tangible
`
`item to mark.
`
`51.
`
`Additionally, claim 1 of the ’745 Patent, claim 9 of the ’242 Patent, and claim 1
`
`of the ’575 Patent are method claims which do not give rise to an obligation to mark under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 287.
`
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS
`
`52.
`
`On information and belief, Akamai offers a variety of Internet content delivery
`
`services that it packages and repackages under a variety of trade names. Many of these are
`
`offered as part of what it calls the “Akamai Intelligent Edge.” On information and belief,
`
`Akamai pervasively uses Equilibrium’s patented inventions in its Intelligent Edge and related
`
`services. A few specific examples are set forth below.
`
`- 16 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00016
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 17 of 37 PageID #: 456
`
`Image and Video Manager
`
`53.
`
`Akamai’s Image and Video Manager feature of its Intelligent Edge is one
`
`example of how Akamai’s services infringe. IVM practices all the limitations of one or more of
`
`the Equilibrium Patent method claims, including at least exemplary independent claim 1 of the
`
`’745 Patent.
`
`54.
`
`Claim 1 of the ’745 Patent recites:
`
`[Preamble] A method in a host computer for developing transformation
`processing operations to optimize media content playback to a plurality of
`playback devices connected with the host computer in a network, the method
`comprising:
`
`[1a.] receiving a first request from a first playback device for media content;
`
`[1b.] wherein the first request contains information, the information indicating a
`first original media content, first content generation operations, and first
`transformation operations;
`
`[1c.] determining whether a previously-generated first intermediate media content
`is available for reuse, the previously-generated first intermediate media content
`having been created using the first original media content and the first set of
`content generation operations; and
`
`[1d.] responsive to determining that a previously-generated first intermediate
`media content is available, creating a first optimized media content for the first
`playback device by performing the first set of transformation operations on the
`previously-generated first intermediate media content; and
`
`[1e.] responsive to determining that a previously-generated first intermediate
`media content is not available, creating a first optimized media content for the
`first playback device by creating a first intermediate content using the first
`original media content and the first set of content generation operations, and
`performing the first set of transformation operations on the first intermediate
`media content; and
`
`[1f.] sending the first optimized media content to the first playback device.
`
`(Ex. F at 23:9-39.)
`
`- 17 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00017
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 18 of 37 PageID #: 457
`
`55.
`
`Akamai’s Image and Video Manager employs “a method in a host computer for
`
`developing transformation processing operations to optimize media content playback to a
`
`plurality of playback devices connected with the host computer in a network.” (Id. at 23:9-12.)
`
`It employs a method in Akamai host edge network computers that develops transformation
`
`processing operations to optimize media content playback to a plurality of playback devices,
`
`such as computers and mobile phones, which are connected to the Akamai edge network via the
`
`Internet. Thus, the preamble, if limiting, is satisfied.
`
`56.
`
`According to Akamai, “Image & Video Manager is a software as a service (SaaS)
`
`solution that automatically optimizes and enhances images and videos for every user on the fly.
`
`It provides each user the ideal combination of quality, format, and size that is best suited for that
`
`user’s browser, device, and network connection at the very moment they access a website or
`
`mobile app.” (Ex. H (“Reference Architecture”) at Overview.)
`
`57.
`
`Akamai publishes the following “Reference Architecture” to describe the methods
`
`employed in IVM:
`
`- 18 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00018
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 19 of 37 PageID #: 458
`
`(Id.)
`
`58.
`
`According to Akamai, IVM “comes out of the box ready to help developers
`
`optimize images, videos, and animated GIFs to deliver great web experiences.” (Ex. I (Akamai
`
`Image and Video Manager Free Developer Trial Brochure) at 1.)
`
`59.
`
`IVM employs a step of “receiving a first request from a first playback device for
`
`media content.” (Ex. F at 23:13-14.) Step 3 of the Akamai IVM workflow depicted in the
`
`Reference Architecture above is: “The Akamai Intelligent Edge Platform receives a user request
`
`and obtains detailed information about the user context, including the browser, device types, and
`
`the quality level of the end user’s current networking connection.” (Ex. H, Step 3.) According
`
`to Akamai, “all [I]mage [M]anager transformations whether they are image optimizations[,]
`
`image transformations or . . . video transformations . . . all happen at the time of the request . . .
`
`- 19 -
`
`IPR2023-00330 Page 00019
`
`

`

`Case 1:22-cv-00677-RGA Document 13 Filed 08/03/22 Page 20 of 37 PageID #: 459
`
`so if we don’t have the variant video asset inside of cache then that very first request for that
`
`video asset would mean that we have to go and that’s when we will kick off that very first
`
`encoding that occurs.” (Ex. J (“Webinar - Image Manager 4.0”) at 1.)
`
`60.
`
`IVM employs a step “wherein the first request contains information, the
`
`information indicating a first original media content, first content generation operations, and first
`
`transformation operations.” (Ex. F at 23:15-18.) The Akamai IVM workflow depicted in the
`
`Reference Architecture above demonstrates that in the IVM system, the workflow is directed to
`
`accessing and optimizing a “one high-quality, pristine file” referred to as an “Original Media
`
`File.” (Ex. H, Step 1.) The first request that IVM receives has information containing, for
`
`example, “browser, device types, and the quality level of the end user’s current networking
`
`connection.” (Id., Step 3.) IVM uses this information as indications from which it determines
`
`which “image transformations” and “image optimizations” to perform on which original media
`
`content. (Ex. J at 4.) The

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket