throbber
Molecular and Cellular Pathobiology
`
`Cancer
`Research
`
`Gender-Specific Molecular and Clinical Features
`Underlie Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
`Assunta De Rienzo1, Michael A. Archer1, Beow Y.Yeap2, Nhien Dao1, Daniele Sciaranghella1,
`Antonios C. Sideris1,Yifan Zheng1, Alexander G. Holman3,Yaoyu E.Wang3, Paola S. Dal Cin4,
`Jonathan A. Fletcher4, Renee Rubio3, Larry Croft5, John Quackenbush3,
`Peter E. Sugarbaker1, Kiara J. Munir1, Jesse R. Battilana1, Corinne E. Gustafson1,
`Lucian R. Chirieac4, Soo Meng Ching5, James Wong5, Liang Chung Tay5, Stephen Rudd5,
`Robert Hercus5, David J. Sugarbaker6, William G. Richards1, and Raphael Bueno1
`
`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`Abstract
`
`Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive
`cancer that occurs more frequently in men, but is associated
`with longer survival in women. Insight into the survival advan-
`tage of female patients may advance the molecular understand-
`ing of MPM and identify therapeutic interventions that will
`improve the prognosis for all MPM patients. In this study, we
`performed whole-genome sequencing of
`tumor specimens
`from 10 MPM patients and matched control samples to identify
`potential driver mutations underlying MPM. We identified
`molecular differences associated with gender and histology.
`Specifically, single-nucleotide variants of BAP1 were observed
`in 21% of cases, with lower mutation rates observed in sarco-
`matoid MPM (P < 0.001). Chromosome 22q loss was more
`frequently associated with the epithelioid than that nonepithe-
`
`liod histology (P ¼ 0.037), whereas CDKN2A deletions
`occurred more frequently in nonepithelioid subtypes among
`men (P ¼ 0.021) and were correlated with shorter overall
`survival for the entire cohort (P ¼ 0.002) and for men (P ¼
`0.012). Furthermore, women were more likely to harbor TP53
`mutations (P ¼ 0.004). Novel mutations were found in genes
`associated with the integrin-linked kinase pathway, including
`MYH9 and RHOA. Moreover, expression levels of BAP1, MYH9,
`and RHOA were significantly higher in nonepithelioid tumors,
`and were associated with significant reduction in survival of the
`entire cohort and across gender subgroups. Collectively, our
`findings indicate that diverse mechanisms highly related to
`gender and histology appear to drive MPM. Cancer Res; 76(2);
`319–28. Ó2015 AACR.
`
`Introduction
`Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare, aggressive
`cancer, associated with prior exposure to asbestos (1). Approxi-
`mately 3,200 new cases are diagnosed in United States annually,
`and the incidence worldwide is estimated to rise during the next
`two decades (2). Prognosis is poor for most patients with a
`
`1The Thoracic Surgery Oncology laboratory and the International
`Mesothelioma Program, Division of Thoracic Surgery and the Lung
`Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School,
`Boston, Massachusetts. 2Department of Medicine, Massachusetts
`General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
`3Center for Cancer Computational Biology, Department of Biostatis-
`tics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and
`Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4Depart-
`ments of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard
`5Malaysian Genomics
`Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
`Resource Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 6Debakey Department of
`Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
`
`Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research
`Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
`
`M.A. Archer and B.Y. Yeap contributed equally to this article.
`
`Corresponding Author: Assunta De Rienzo, Division of Thoracic Surgery,
`Brigham and Women's Hospital 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. Phone:
`(617) 732-6526; Fax: (617) 566-3441; E-mail: aderienzo@partners.org.
`
`doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0751
`Ó2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
`
`reported median survival between 4 and 12 months because
`there are few effective systemic treatments for this malignancy
`(3). Three major histologic types are recognized in MPM: epithe-
`lioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic (4). The incidence of MPM is
`higher in men than women, likely because of the more common
`occupational asbestos exposure in men, whereas women are
`usually subject to secondary exposure through spouses' clothing,
`low-level environmental exposure, and other sources (5, 6). A
`recent study suggests that female patients with MPM live signif-
`icantly longer compared with men even after adjustment for
`potential confounders such as age, stage, and treatment (5).
`High-throughput sequencing techniques have revealed that
`each cancer genome appears to have a unique genetic profile
`acquired through cumulative genetic alterations, including driver
`mutations, that may confer advantageous survival phenotypes on
`the cancerous cells and represent precise therapeutic targets (7).
`To date, the genetic landscape of MPM has been primarily
`described in terms of chromosomal rearrangement events inves-
`tigated mostly in epithelioid and biphasic human specimens
`and cell lines (8). The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A
`(CDKN2A),
`the neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and the
`BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) genes have been shown to
`be the most frequently mutated tumor suppressor genes in MPM
`(9–12). Recently, two independent investigations have identified
`BAP1 as frequently mutated in the chromosomal region 3p21.1 in
`sporadic and familial MPM, indicating the importance of genetic
`factors in MPM susceptibility (10, 12, 13). Although BAP1
`
`www.aacrjournals.org
`
`319
`
`Personalis EX2157
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`De Rienzo et al.
`
`mutations have been associated with age (10) and with the
`epithelioid subtype (14), no other significant correlation of these
`genes to demographic, clinical, or pathologic variables has so far
`been identified.
`In the current study, a comprehensive genome-wide approach
`was applied to discover novel genetic alterations in MPM. Whole-
`genome sequencing data of tumor specimens from 10 MPM
`patients and their matched normal tissue were analyzed to iden-
`tify novel somatic point mutations. A bioinformatic approach was
`employed to prioritize genes to further analyze by focused
`sequencing in close to three hundred additional MPM tumor
`samples.
`
`Materials and Methods
`Specimens and cell lines
`All tumor and normal lung specimens were collected at surgery
`with patient consent, freshly frozen, stored, and annotated by the
`institutional tumor bank with Institutional Review Board approv-
`al at Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH; Boston, MA). High
`quality, tumor enriched (15) samples were prepared as previously
`described (16). Tumor cell enrichment (>83% for whole-genome
`sequencing experiments; >40% for targeted resequencing experi-
`ments) was confirmed by reviewing hematoxylin and eosin
`(H&E)-stained frozen sections. Eleven mesothelioma cell lines
`(H2052, MSTO-211H, H2452, H28, and the epithelial virus
`transformed MET5A from the (ATCC), JMN and JMN1B from
`Cell Culture Core (BWH), and MESO257, MESO428, MESO589,
`MS924 from the laboratory of J.A. Fletcher] were cultured in RPMI
`(Invitrogen Corporation) containing 10% FBS (ATCC) and main-
`
`tained at 37
`C in 5% CO2. Cells were collected at 70% confluence
`and frozen for DNA extraction or placed in RNA extraction
`buffer (TRIzol reagent, Invitrogen) for RNA extraction. DNA was
`isolated using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and RNA using the
`TRIzol (Thermo Fisher) method in combination with RNeasy kit
`(Qiagen). RNase or DNase I (Qiagen) treatments were conducted
`according to the manufacturer's instructions. Matched normal
`DNA was prepared from peripheral blood or lung tissue. Nucleic
`acids were quantified using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer
`(Thermo Fisher). The integrity of the DNA and RNA were deter-
`mined using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher) and Agilent
`2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent), respectively.
`
`Whole-genome sequencing
`Whole-genome sequencing of 10 tumor and 10 matched
`normal genomic DNA (obtained from blood) samples (3 mg)
`was accomplished using a Complete Genomics platform (17).
`Mean coverage of tumor and normal genomes were 187 and
`188, respectively (Supplementary Table S1). All the pair-end
`reads were filtered on the basis of average read quality score  20.
`Candidate somatic mutations were detected using the SynaAlign
`program (Synamatix). Briefly, sequencing reads were first aligned
`to the human reference genome (hg19) using short read mapper
`SXmapper (Synamatix) with default parameter settings. The
`numbers of reads containing single nucleotide variants (SNV)
`and indels in both tumor and germline samples were counted and
`the quality score of each base and the read direction information
`were collected. This information and the mapping statistics for
`each read across the genome (reads in repeat regions etc.) were
`used to call SNVs and indels. The null hypothesis of equal allele
`frequencies in tumor and germline samples was tested using the
`
`two-tailed Fisher exact test on quality-filtered SNVs and indels.
`Data were also collected for each sample on larger scale structural
`variations, loss of heterozygosity, and copy number variations.
`
`Validation of SNV by Sanger sequencing
`Selected candidate SNVs were further characterized using PCR
`and conventional Sanger sequencing to confirm tumor-specific
`single-nucleotide mutations. Gene-specific primer pairs were used
`to PCR amplify genomic DNA from tumor and normal specimens
`(Supplementary Table S2) as previously described (16). For TP53
`analysis, primers were chosen in the flanking intronic region of
`each exon. Twenty-two samples were analyzed using both rese-
`quencing and Sanger methods. Discordant results were found in
`six cases, probably due to tissue heterogeneity. In discordant cases,
`the mutation was called as present for each sample.
`
`Karyotype and FISH analysis
`Metaphase chromosome spreads from diagnostic MPM sam-
`ples were prepared and G-banded according to standard proce-
`dures as part of the routine BWH pathologic evaluation of all
`MPM cases. Additional FISH analyses were performed in those
`samples either with no metaphases or normal karyotype in the
`context of pathologic mesothelioma positive report. FISH analysis
`was performed using the Vysis LSICDKN2A/CEP9 Dual Color
`Probe Set (Abbott Molecular) for the CDKN2A locus at 9p21,
`CEP9 at the chromosome 9 centromeric region, and Vysis TUPLE
`1/LSI ARSA Dual Color Probe Set (Abbott) for TUPLE 1 at 22q11.2
`and ARSA at 22q13. Observed aberration in  2% of observed
`nuclei (minimum 50 per case) was reported as consistent with a
`clonal, neoplastic, and cellular proliferation.
`
`Additional dual-color FISH analysis
`For a subset of cases, dual-color FISH analysis was performed
`on frozen sections (5 mm) to assess two distinct regions of
`chromosome 22. The sections were fixed at room temperature
`for two hours in freshly prepared 3:1 methanol:acetic acid, then
`air-dried.
`Bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) DNA probes (CHORI,
`BAC PAC Resource) containing most or all of the coding sequence
`for NF2 (RP11-155B12, 159 kb) and MYH9 (RP11-105I18,
`161 kb) were selected and labeled by nick translation (Abbott),
`NF2 with Orange dUTP, and MYH9 with Green dUTP. Slides were
`pretreated with pepsin (Digest-All 3, Invitrogen) 5 to 15 minutes
`
`at 37
`C, rinsed in PBS for 5 minutes at room temperature, post-
`fixed 1 minute in 10% formalin, rinsed in PBS, dehydrated in
`ethanol series, and air-dried. FISH procedure followed standard
`protocols. Scoring was performed by two technologists, each
`scoring Orange (O, NF2) and Green (G, MYH9) signals present
`on 50 nuclei, for 100 nuclei total per specimen in an area
`determined by a pathologist in parallel H&E-stained sections to
`have a minimum tumor involvement of 40%. Negative controls
`were a normal lymphoblast line with metaphases to confirm
`localization, and sections from four tumors with no histologically
`apparent tumor in the scored areas. Each deletion signal pattern
`(1O1G, 1O2G, 2O1G) was determined to be present if its fre-
`quency exceeded the mean plus 3 SDs of the same pattern in the
`normal sections.
`
`Target capture, sequencing, and data analysis
`Library preparation, custom exome capture, and next-genera-
`tion sequencing were performed at
`the Center for Cancer
`
`320
`
`Cancer Res; 76(2) January 15, 2016
`
`Cancer Research
`
`Personalis EX2157
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`Computational Biology. Library construction and custom exome
`capture were performed using the SureSelect XT2 for Illumina
`protocol (Agilent) according to the manufacturer's instructions
`Libraries were combined to 3 library pools, diluted to a 2 nmol/L
`working stock and sequenced at a final concentration of 12 pmol/
`L on a paired end flowcell with 50 cycles in each direction.
`Sequencing was done on a HiSeq 2000 (Illumina) according to
`the manufacturer's protocols. Sequencing reads were demulti-
`plexed using the Illumina CASAVA package and aligned to the
`hg19 assembly of the human genome using BWA aln with default
`parameters and a mismatch penalty of 1 (18). SNV and indel
`discovery was performed using HaplotypeCaller within the GATK
`package with default parameters (19). Variants with a minimum
`phred-scaled confidence threshold under 10 were excluded, and
`those under 30 were flagged as low quality. Resulting variant calls
`were annotated for potential genetic impact using the SnpEff
`package (20).
`
`Microarray analysis
`Expression levels of specific genes were explored using micro-
`array data from a parallel project. Epithelioid samples (N ¼ 129)
`were selected from the International Mesothelioma Program
`Tumor Bank (Supplementary Fig. S1). This sample set consisted
`of male and female samples matched by age and nodal status
`(Coleman MH, and Bueno R; personal communication). In
`addition, 19 sarcomatoid and 3 biphasic MPM samples were
`included in the analysis. To determine the levels of transcripts in
`each sample, 0.25 mg of total RNA was amplified using the
`Ambion WT Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher). The cRNA was
`hybridized to Affymetrix Human Gene 1.1 ST Array (Thermo
`Fisher), subsequently labeled with GeneChip WT Terminal Label-
`ing Kit (Thermo Fisher), and scanned with a GeneAtlas Worksta-
`tion (Thermo Fisher). Hybridization, washing, staining, and
`scanner procedures were performed per manufacturer's recom-
`mendations. For quality control across platforms, two MAQC
`samples were included in the analysis (21). A blind control was
`also added to check the variability of the expression values across
`the chips. The probe intensity distribution was examined for
`quality control and outliers were removed. Expression levels for
`BAP1, NF2, TP53, MYH9, MYH6, MYH10, PIK3C2A, RHOA, and
`TNFRSF1A for
`this cohort are included in Supplementary
`Table S3.
`
`Statistical analysis of mutation status and gene expression
`versus clinicopathologic variables
`Asbestos exposure was analyzed as a binary covariate with
`background exposure defined as asbestos body counts in lung
`
`Novel Molecular and Gender-Specific Features in Mesothelioma
`
`tissue  50 fibers per gram of wet lung tissue. Fisher exact test
`was used to compare histology, gender, and asbestos exposure
`between mutation and wild-type groups, whereas Wilcoxon
`rank sum test was used to analyze age as a continuous covariate.
`Overall survival was defined from the date of definitive surgery
`until the date of death or was censored at the date of last follow-
`up for patients who had not died at their latest contact. Overall
`survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, with
`group differences assessed by the log-rank test. The normalized
`expression level of each candidate gene was initially grouped
`into quartiles for exploratory survival analysis. Patient sub-
`groups with comparable survival were combined for further
`analysis to estimate the meaningful differences. Proportional
`hazards regression was used to estimate the HR for reporting a
`survival difference, including adjusting for the gender effect. All
`P values are based on a two-sided hypothesis, with P < 0.01
`used to identify potentially significant results to be conservative
`on false positives. Data analysis was performed using SAS 9.4
`(SAS Institute).
`
`Results
`Experimental subjects
`Ten MPM tumor and matched normal DNA samples were
`analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (Table 1). Matched MPM
`and normal DNA from 283 additional patients was subjected
`to focused sequencing (Table 2).
`
`Tumor somatic DNA variants
`Point mutations, small (<30 bp) structural variations, and
`copy number alterations were discovered in 10 pairs of whole-
`genome sequencing MPM tumor and germline DNA samples
`using computational approaches. Single nucleotide variants
`(N ¼ 146; SNVs) mapping in the amino acid coding regions
`of annotated exons and generating nonsynonymous amino
`acid changes were further resequenced in the tumor and normal
`DNA by Sanger methodology. Eighty-five were confirmed to
`be tumor-specific (Supplementary Table S2). Each patient's
`sample pair displayed a unique small number of point muta-
`tions ranging from three to 20 per tumor. Seventy-eight SNVs
`were missense and seven were nonsense mutations. TP53 was
`found mutated in 2 of 10 tumors (20%). In both cases, the
`tumors came from female patients with asbestos body counts in
`the background range as measured in resected lung tissue (data
`not shown). Three of the mutated genes (RNF43, TP53 and
`MYH9) were listed in the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutation In
`Cancer (COSMIC, Release v69) database (22).
`
`Table 1. Clinical and molecular characteristics of the 10 MPM samples included in the whole-genome sequencing analysis
`Tumor sample
`Histology
`Gender
`Asbestos body counts
`CG3
`Biphasic
`M
`N/A
`CG5
`Biphasic
`M
`87
`CG4
`Epithelial
`M
`25
`CG10
`Biphasic
`M
`N/A
`CG9
`Epithelial
`M
`934
`CG12
`Biphasic
`M
`1,382
`CG14
`Epithelial
`F
`6
`CG16
`Epithelial
`F
`3
`CG18
`Epithelial
`F
`0
`CG20
`Epithelial
`M
`25
`Abbreviation: N/A, not available.
`
`9p (FISH)
`N/A
`Abnormal
`Abnormal
`Normal
`Normal
`Normal
`Abnormal
`Abnormal
`Normal
`Normal
`
`22q (FISH)
`N/A
`Abnormal
`N/A
`Normal
`Abnormal
`Abnormal
`Abnormal
`Abnormal
`N/A
`Abnormal
`
`www.aacrjournals.org
`
`Cancer Res; 76(2) January 15, 2016
`
`321
`
`Personalis EX2157
`
`

`

`De Rienzo et al.
`
`Table 2. Clinical and histopathologic characteristics of patients in mutational
`and expression analyses
`
`Mutational
`283
`34 (12%)
`
`45 (2–106)
`
`61 (17–84)
`
`195 (69%)
`88 (31%)
`
`Evaluable for analysis
`Alive at last follow-up
`Follow-up from surgery, months
`Median (range)
`Age, years
`Median (range)
`Gender
`Male
`Female
`Histologic subtype
`205 (72%)
`Epithelioid
`52 (18%)
`Biphasic
`25 (9%)
`Sarcomatoid
`1 (<1%)
`Desmoplastic
`Asbestos body counts per gram wet lung tissuea
`50 fibers
`31 (37%)
`67 (45%)
`>50 fibers
`53 (63%)
`81 (55%)
`aAsbestos data missing for 135 patients in mutational analysis and for 67 patients
`in expression analysis.
`
`Expression
`151
`6 (4%)
`
`59 (4–99)
`
`59 (17–75)
`
`85 (56%)
`66 (44%)
`
`129 (85%)
`3 (2%)
`19 (13%)
`0
`
`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`correlation was found between mutation in BAP1 and gender,
`exposure to asbestos, or survival. BAP1 mutations were associated
`with marginally older age compared with wild-type tumors
`(median 67 vs. 64 years; P ¼ 0.050). BAP1 mutations were also
`observed in cell lines H2452 and H28. Table 3 describes the cases
`carrying BAP1 germline mutations.
`NF2 point mutations occurred in 21 (14%) of 147 analyzed
`samples (Supplementary Table S5A). In addition, karyotype, and/
`or FISH analyses available for 133 of these 147 samples showed
`that 75 samples (56%) had loss of chromosome 22q. Eleven of
`133 (8%) had both NF2 point mutation and 22q deletion.
`Compared with the cases with two copies of 22q, the deletion
`of 22q was more frequently associated with the epithelioid than
`nonepithelioid histology (P ¼ 0.037). The difference was greater
`in women but did not reach strict statistical significance due to low
`power (P¼ 0.141). Mutations in NF2 were not correlated with any
`of the other clinical or pathologic variables examined. NF2
`mutation was found in H2052.
`Karyotyping and/or FISH analyses of CDKN2A were available
`for 133 of 147 samples. Eighty-two (62%) of 133 samples had
`deletion of the CDKN2A region on 9p (determined by karyotyp-
`ing) and/or confirmed CDKN2A deletion (as determined by FISH
`with a CDKN2A probe). Forty-one of 74 (55%) epithelioid, 29 of
`41 (71%) biphasic, 11 of 17 (65%) sarcomatoid, and one of one
`desmoplastic samples had CDKN2A deletion. Compared with the
`cases with two copies of CDKN2A, cases with CDKN2A deletion
`appeared to be more frequently associated with the nonepithe-
`lioid histology (P ¼ 0.117). When this analysis was repeated for
`gender, the association between histology and CDKN2A loss was
`statistically significant only for the men (P ¼ 0.021). Interestingly,
`deletions in CDKN2A were correlated with shorter overall survival
`in the whole cohort (P¼ 0.002), but the difference was statistically
`significant only in the men (P ¼ 0.012).
`TP53 was mutated in 22 cases (15%) in this sample set
`(Supplementary Table S5B). Three mutations (D49N, C176F,
`A86T) were present in both the tumor and the normal DNA
`(Table 3). Notably, one sample showed only one germline TP53
`mutation (D49N) and no mutation in any of the other genes
`investigated herein. None of the cell lines examined exhibited
`TP53 mutations.
`No difference was observed in overall survival between the
`group of 62 patients with point mutation in at least one of the
`established MPM-related genes (BAP1, NF2, TP53) and the group
`wild-type for these genes (P ¼ 0.646).
`Forty SNVs in 31 samples (21%) occurred in ILK pathway–
`associated genes (TNFRSF1A, PIK3C2A, MYH10, MYH6, MYH9,
`and RHOA; Supplementary Table S5C), of which 35 (88%) were
`germline. Fifteen patients (43%) carrying a germline mutation in
`one or more of these genes had familial history of cancer. Only
`one SNV, in TNFRSF1A, is known to occur frequently (>1%–2%)
`in the general population (23). This SNV occurred in 5 patients
`and was predicted to have a "probably damaging" effect
`(PolyPhen: http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) on the
`corresponding protein. Seven germline mutations were identified
`in PIK3C2A. Five were predicted to be benign and two "possibly
`damaging", one of which resides in the PI3K C2 domain. Twenty-
`six SNVs resided in three myosin heavy chain genes. Two samples
`displayed germline mutation of MYH10. Although functional
`analyses predict a benign effect, these mutations occur near
`mutations identified in other cancers (24). Nine germline muta-
`tions were detected in MYH6, two of which had a predicted
`
`Functional analysis of point mutations
`To identify clusters of genes associated with known pathways,
`functional enrichments of genes affected by point mutations were
`performed utilizing Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Qiagen) using
`Biological Process Gene Ontology terms and canonical pathways.
`Among 216 canonical pathways identified, 51 were significantly
`enriched (P < 0.05) for the mutated genes (Supplementary
`Table S4). Mutations affecting genes involved in the integrin-
`linked kinase (ILK) pathway were the most significantly (P ¼
`4.9e5) enriched. Specifically, 5 of the 10 sequenced MPM
`samples showed point mutations in at least one of 6 identified
`genes associated with this pathway (MYH9, MYH6, MYH10,
`PIK3C2A, RHOA, and TNFRSF1A; Fig. 1A).
`
`Validation of the candidate driver genes in an independent
`cohort
`To further assess the prevalence of mutations observed herein
`and in previous studies (9–12), a panel of 147 MPM tumors
`(including 81 epithelioid, 41 biphasic, 24 sarcomatoid, and 1
`desmoplastic) and 11 previously established MPM cell lines were
`further analyzed using targeted resequencing of BAP1, NF2, TP53,
`MYH9, MYH6, MYH10, PIK3C2A, RHOA, and TNFRSF1A. This
`cohort included tumor samples from women (n ¼ 30) to evaluate
`the frequency of mutations with respect to gender. In addition,
`clinical karyotype analysis and FISH data for CDKN2A and
`22q were available for most of the patients. Targeted resequen-
`cing revealed 116 nonsynonymous SNVs and/or INDELs (Sup-
`plementary Table S5A–S5C). Seven of these were confirmed to
`be single-nucleotide polymorphisms occurring at high frequen-
`cy (>1%–2%) in the normal population. The remaining 109
`occurring in 86 samples were further examined in normal and
`tumor DNA pairs by Sanger sequencing. One or more somatic
`mutations were confirmed in 81 of 147 samples (55%).
`BAP1 was mutated in 31 of 147 (21%) samples (Supplemen-
`tary Table S5A). Twenty-six tumor-specific variants and 5 germline
`variants (present in tumor and normal matching DNA) were
`observed. In six samples, multiple BAP1 mutations were identi-
`fied. The mutations occurred mostly in epithelioid (23%) and
`biphasic (24%) samples, whereas only two of 24 sarcomatoid
`(8%) samples had tumor-specific BAP1 mutations. No significant
`
`322
`
`Cancer Res; 76(2) January 15, 2016
`
`Cancer Research
`
`Personalis EX2157
`
`

`

`Novel Molecular and Gender-Specific Features in Mesothelioma
`
`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`Figure 1.
`A, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to connect a subset of six genes (MYH9, MYH6, MYH10, PIK3C2A, RHOA, and TNFRSF1A), with tumor specific mutations in
`five MPM samples, mapping in the integrin-linked kinase pathway. Four genes (UBC, MDM2, CLTC, and SRC) were added to show the indirect relationship. The
`connectivity map was generated from available published data (Ingenuity Systems). Each symbol for gene denotes the function of the interacting protein.
`Symbols representing specific categories of cellular molecules as well as interactive relationships are depicted in the legend. B, schematic representation of the SNVs
`identified in MYH9, MYH10, MYH6, and RHOA. Nucleotide-binding domains and protein domains are included. C, dual color FISH analysis of MYH9 and
`NF2 in MPM samples. Negative control (normal lymphoblast line with metaphases to confirm localization) is in the top left. The orange probe is specific for NF2, the
`green for MYH9.
`
`"probably damaging" effect and one caused a reading frame
`shift. Twelve samples exhibited germline mutations in MYH9;
`seven had a predicted "possibly or probably damaging" effect.
`Although many mutations of MYH9 have been identified in
`several other cancers, only R1576Q identified in our series has
`been previously described (24).
`In 4 patients, tumor-specific mutations of ILK pathway–asso-
`
`ciated genes were identified: 3 in MYH9 (1.4%; Q738
`, K737N,
`A1197fs) and 2 in RHOA (1.4%; Y66N, A161V). One patient had
`in MYH9 one germline and two tumor-specific mutations. No
`significant correlation was found between the mutations in the
`ILK pathway–associated genes and clinical or pathologic vari-
`ables. No cell line exhibited mutations in these genes. Figure 1B
`depicts the mutations found in the myosin heavy chain genes and
`RHOA. Aberrations identified in BAP1, NF2, TP53, MYH9, MYH6,
`
`MYH10, PIK3C2A, RHOA, TNFRSF1A, 9p/CDKN2A, and 22q are
`illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S2.
`
`Assessment of NF2 and MYH9 copy number status
`Given the proximity of NF2 and MYH9 on the chromosome,
`22q copy number status was explored. Although allelic loss in this
`region is common in MPM, the probes used for standard clinical
`FISH analysis do not distinguish copy number independently
`for these two genes. Dual-color FISH analysis using MYH9- and
`NF2-specific probes was undertaken for the 13 cases carrying
`MYH9 mutation. Of the 13 primary tumors in which the two
`markers could be assessed, 2 (15%) exhibited no aberrations
`involving NF2 or MYH9; 1 (8%) was abnormal by losing NF2
`only; 7 (54%) had loss of both markers; and 3 (23%) samples
`exhibited extra copies of both markers likely due to polyploidy
`
`www.aacrjournals.org
`
`Cancer Res; 76(2) January 15, 2016
`
`323
`
`Personalis EX2157
`
`

`

`Downloaded from http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/76/2/319/2741046/319.pdf by guest on 29 September 2023
`
`De Rienzo et al.
`
`Table 3. Protein alteration and clinical information of the cases carrying BAP1 and TP53 germline mutations
`Functional classification
`Gene
`Protein alteration
`Gender
`Other cancer (self)
`W196
`BAP1
`Male
`No
`BAP1
`W202C
`Male
`No
`V171
`BAP1
`Male
`No
`
`Probably damaging (score 1)a
`
`BAP1
`BAP1
`
`TP53
`
`TP53
`TP53
`
`TP53
`
`G41S
`Splice site acceptor
`
`Benign (score 0.078)a
`
`R248W
`
`Deleteriousb
`
`D49N
`C176F
`
`A86T
`
`Neutralb
`Deleteriousb
`
`Neutralb
`
`aPolyphen (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/).
`bhttp://p53.iarc.fr/.
`
`Male
`Female
`
`Female
`
`Male
`Female
`
`Male
`
`No
`No
`
`No
`
`Skin cancer
`Myelodysplasia, Acute myeloid
`leukemia
`No
`
`Other cancer in the family
`No
`Nasal (father), Breast (sister)
`Renal and gastric (mother), lung
`(grandfather)
`Lung (father)
`Prostate (father), Meningioma
`(mother), Bladder (sister)
`Prostate (father),
`Rhabdomyosarcoma
`(grandmother)
`No
`No
`
`Unknown (two sisters and
`grandparents)
`
`(Supplementary Table S5D; ref. 25). Two of the 7 cases displaying
`loss of both markers had tumor-specific mutation in both MYH9
`and NF2, whereas 5 had tumor-specific mutation of MYH9 only.
`Furthermore, the case exhibiting NF2 loss only presented two
`tumor-specific mutations in addition to one germline mutation in
`MYH9. Examples of FISH analysis are shown in Fig. 1C.
`
`Mutual exclusivity
`In MPM, tumor-specific mutations in RHOA, MYH9 and TP53
`were mutually exclusive events that occurred more frequently in
`women (30%) than in men (12%) (P ¼ 0.023). We examined the
`relationship between RHOA and MYH9 in other cancers using the
`cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics (accessed July 13, 2015; ref. 24).
`Notably, in 26 of 31 (84%) tumor types that had mutations in
`both genes, RHOA and MYH9 mutations had a strong tendency
`toward mutual exclusivity (Supplementary Table S6).
`
`Analysis of TP53 in additional MPM cases
`Given that mutations of TP53 were found more commonly in
`women, and that women with MPM generally have lower levels of
`asbestos exposure than men, we expanded our validation cohort
`to power exploration of these associations. Mutational status of
`TP53 was analyzed by Sanger sequencing in 136 additional MPM
`samples. Asbestos counts were available for 148 of 283 cases in the
`combined cohort, including tumors from 88 women and 67
`patients with asbestos body counts in lung tissue consistent with
`background exposure ( 50 fibers/g lung tissue; ref. 26). Thirty-
`eight of 283 patients (13%) had TP53 point mutations, including
`18 men (9%) and 20 women (23%), (P ¼ 0.004; Supplementary
`Table S5B). Expanding the cohort added one case (total 4/283)
`with germline TP53 mutation (R248W; Table 3). Although TP53
`mutations were found more frequently in tumors with back-
`ground versus higher asbestos exposure, the analysis did not have
`sufficient power to exclude exposure level as a risk factor in either
`the whole cohort (P ¼ 0.068) or among women (P ¼ 0.498). No
`significant correlation of mutations in TP53 was found to either
`survival, or histologic subtype.
`
`Expression analysis of the candidate genes
`A comparative exploratory analysis of MPM transcriptomic
`profiles was conducted to determine whether histologic subtype,
`survival, or gender are correlated with specific expression patterns
`in BAP1, NF2, TP53, MYH9, MYH6, MYH10, PIK3C2A, RHOA,
`
`CDKN2A, and TNFRSF1A (Supplementary Fig. S1; Supplemen-
`tary Table S3). This cohort comprised 85 men and 66 women. Ten
`samples were also included in the sequencing analysis; these were
`pure epithelioid tumors showing no mutation in BAP1, MYH9, or
`RHOA.
`Nonepithelioid (versus epithelioid) tumors expressed signif-
`icantly higher levels of BAP1 (P < 0.001), MYH9 (P < 0.001),
`RHOA (P < 0.001), and MYH10 (P ¼ 0.001). RHOA was more
`highly expressed in men than women (P ¼ 0.001). Expression
`levels of other genes examined were not correlated with gender
`or histology.
`Patients with lower BAP1 expression had improved overall
`survival (P < 0.001; Fig. 2A). The highest quartiles of BAP1
`expression were associated with twice the risk of death (HR ¼
`2.31) compared with the lowest quartile, after adjusting for the
`independent effect of gender. The survival difference was similar
`across gender subgroups (male: HR¼ 2.20; P¼ 0.005; and female:
`HR ¼ 2.38; P ¼ 0.004; Fig. 2B). Similarly, the highest quartile of
`MYH9 expression was associated with increased gender-adjusted
`risk of death (HR ¼ 2.23) compared with the lower three quartiles
`(P < 0.001; Fig. 2C). MYH9 expression was associated with twice
`the risk of death in both males (HR¼ 2.26; P¼ 0.001) and females
`(HR ¼ 2.17; P ¼ 0.022; Fig. 2D). In the entire cohort, lower RHOA
`express

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket