throbber
John West
`Carol Tillis; Eliane Sousa
`Richard Chen; Christian Haudenschild
`John West"s Board Slides
`Wednesday, September 5, 2012 7:10:37 AM
`CEO Overview JW 5Sept2012.ppt
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Eliane,
`
`These are ready to print.
`
`Thank you.
`
`John
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Personalis Board of Directors Meeting
`CEO Overview
`
`John West
`Sept 5th, 2012
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`1
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Personalis Overview
`
`• R&D achieved target: prototype ready for beta testing at end of August
`•
`First purchase order imminent ($100k, rare brain disease research)
`– Exome sequencing, pipeline, annotation & case/control analysis
`– Example of rapid potential revenue & transaction size in research market
`• New labs operational (HiSeq & MiSeq; Whole genomes & now exomes)
`Increasing attraction of in-house sequencing combined with analysis
`•
`– Implement proprietary content in lab assays, 1st: Exome-plus
`– Turnaround time & CLIA attractive to customers
`– Achieve margin from the lab assay and informatics
`– Positioning towards whole-genome diagnostics, not bioinformatics
`– Proposal to move forward CapEx for 2nd HiSeq (from early 2013)
`Formal Applications submitted for CLIA & CAP accreditation
`•
`Invited presentation : NIST meeting, co-funded by FDA
`•
`• Recruiting transitioning to commercial roles
`• Cash at 8/31 $500k above newest budget
`•
`Prepared to discuss Series B scenarios & potential new investors
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`2
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Exomes Approach 50% of All New Human SRA Entries
`Whole Genome (including skim-coverage) 20%
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/3/2012
`
`3
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Exome Issues
`
`• Amount of sequencing & cost issues:
`– Exons are < 3% of the genome
`– Technology for pullout is non-uniform; draws some off target DNA too
`– Compensated by higher average coverage
`– Sample prep prior to exome sequencing is more complex, costly
`– Illumina vs Complete Genomics price war has not touched exomes
`– Net, exome pricing is about 50% of whole genome
`
`• Technical performance :
`– Little content outside the exons
`– Coverage non-uniformity due to pullout and PCR-based GC-bias
`– Worse alignment due to short molecules used to match short exons
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`4
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Exome Issues
`
`• Personalis Perspectives :
`– 10x sample throughput per sequencer CapEx investment
`• 48 exomes / HiSeq run vs 5 whole genomes
`• More practical for Personalis to leverage turnaround time
`
`– Room for reasonable margins
`
`– Technical challenges are an opportunity to differentiate
`• Ensure forward applicable to whole genome
`
`– Lower price point assay & higher sample throughput increase the
`sample volume accessible to our content & bioinformatics offerings
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`5
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Differentiation of Personalis “Exome-Plus” Service
`
`• Premium delivery of otherwise full-coverage exome sequencing:
`– Turn-around time; prep & pullout optimization
`
`• Custom pullout #1, from standard (short molecule) library prep :
`– Personalis content outside the exons
`• Proprietary: PharmGKB, VariMed, Regulome
`• Deep intronic splice sites & SV junction sequences
`– Supplementary coverage to fill in the valleys of the standard exome
`– Run on the HiSeq with the normal pullout, at standard read lengths
`
`• Custom pullout #2, from long molecule (1-2 kbp) library prep :
`– Run multiplexed on MiSeq, with longer reads
`– Focus on content with alignment-related accuracy problems
`– HLA, Segmental duplications, Expanding repeat diseases, etc
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`6
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Key Gross Margin Inputs
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`7
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Appendix
`
`Slides from July meeting related to revenue plan
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`8
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Revenue Plan
`
`• Personalis plan changed to begin with Pipeline product vs comprehensive
`genome interpretation:
`– 100% research market, but accuracy a key requirement for clinical
`products
`– Headline application, Case / Control studies, inherently require larger
`#’s of genomes
`
`•
`
`Lab as an expanding part of our plan:
`– Direct relationship with the customer
`– Position towards whole-genome molecular diagnostics, vs “a
`bioinformatics company”
`– Opportunity to implement our IP in physical assays
`– Capture margin of the assay by leveraging our informatics
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`9
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Revenue Planning
`
`• Multiple assay scales:
`– Whole genome + Personalis “Exome-plus”
`– Just Personalis “Exome-plus”
`– Just a “standard” Exome
`– User provides data
`• Revenue Components:
`– Whole genome is 3rd party pass-through, so not in revenue or COGS
`– Base of in-house capacity to generate exomes with/without Personalis content &
`Personalis Pipeline analysis (linearly scalable with moderate CapEx)
`– Professional services overlay for Rare-Variant-Discovery-Service and Genome-
`Interpretation-Service products (Experience curve & automation are key to
`scalability)
`• Customer interaction model:
`– Pipeline : Case vs Control, chunks of 48 genomes, > $100k / transaction
`– RVDS & GIS : Genomes typically in trio or solo units, but customer relationship is
`to establish a flow, which we aggregate into 48-genome chunks internally
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`10
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Pricing Ranges of Components in Current Model
`
`• Whole genome sequencing (pass-through) :
`– 20 units, research only, 30x coverage : $3,400 mid-2012
`– Price of reagents alone to Personalis : $4,000 – Non-competitive
`– Multiple premium offerings seeking higher unit pricing:
`• 60x coverage : $6,100
`• CLIA single unit : $ 7,500 – 9,500
`• Rapid turn-around : $ 9,500
`• Exomes :
`– Not offered by Illumina or Complete Genomics
`– Multiple services, e.g. BGI : $1,800 – Prices firming
`– Personalis standard exome with Pipeline analysis : $2,500 / unit (Quantity 48)
`– Personalis “Exome-plus” with Pipeline analysis : $3,500 / unit (Quantity 48)
`• Professional services:
`– Unit = 8 hours genetic counselor + 1 hour MD : $3,500
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`11
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Example Pricing, Combining Components
`
`• Case / Control research service:
`– 24 cases + 24 controls
`– Personalis “Exome-Plus” with Pipeline Analysis only
`– 48 x $3,500 = $168k / project
`
`• Rare Variant Discovery Service:
`– Unit is for one trio (parents + child) but contract sought is for flow (N trios per time period)
`– 3 x “Exome-Plus” with 1 day RUO Professional Services
`– (3 x $3,500) + $3,500 = $14,000 (i.e. above Ambry)
`
`• Premium Genome Interpretation Service:
`– Unit is for one genome, but contract sought is for a flow
`– Pass-through Illumina 30x genome + Personalis “Exome-plus” + 2 days Professional
`Services
`– $ 3,400 + $3,500 + $7,000 = $13,900 ($10,500 is recognized as Personalis revenue)
`– Multiple price points with different combinations of components, to address differing customer
`needs & compete
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`12
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Top Level Revenue Breakdown by Product
`
`One product intro / quarter
`RVDS & GIS (35% of 2013 plan) could slip, depending on Pipeline feedback
`
`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`13
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

`

`Personalis Confidential 9/5/2012
`
`14
`
`Personalis EX2086
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket