throbber
Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 9
`FILED
`May20, 2021
`WESTERNDISTRICTOFTEXAS
`BW DEPUTY
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERNDISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`BY:
`
`xX
`
`))
`
`) )
`
`) 6:19-CV-00513-ADA
`)
`
`))
`
`) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`)
`xX
`
`mananasennanccwwenenneeennncencecncecnnwaece“==neeseameenconee
`
`CloudofChange, LLC,
`
`v.
`
`NCR Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`serenemannannmnsecccnensscncnsesescsceensennancensennnesenssasee
`
`JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please follow
`
`the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous.
`
`Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Jury
`
`Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of
`
`any legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 1 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 9
`
`As used herein, “CloudofChange” means CloudofChange, LLC, and “NCR” means ‘NCR
`
`Corporation.” Asused herein, “the '640 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,400,640 and “the '012
`
`Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 10,083,012.
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 2 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 3 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 3 of 9
`
`We,the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return
`them as our verdictin this case:
`
`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`Directions - Questions Nos. 1 & 2
`
`In answering the Questions below, please check “Yes” or “No”for each listed asserted claim
`in the space provided,
`
`Question No. 1: Has CloudofChange proven bya preponderance of the evidence
`
`that NCR has infringed the following asserted claims ofthe 640 Patent? “Yes”is in favor
`
`of CloudofChange and “No”is in favor of NCR.
`
`If your answer belowto Claim1 is “No”then do not answerthis question as to the
`
`remaining claims fromthe “640 patent but go on to Question No.2.
`
`°640 Patent
`
`Claim 1:
`Claim 3:
`Claim 4:
`Claim5:
`Claim 6:
`Claim11:
`Claim 12:
`Claim 13:
`
`ves%_ No
`vesK No
`YesW No
`Yes No
`Yes__ No
`Yes_ A No
`Yes x No
`Yes XL no
`
`91624453v,1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 3 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 4 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 4 of 9
`
`Question No. 2: Has CloudofChange proven bya preponderance of the evidence
`
`that NCR hasinfringed the following asserted claims of the ’012 Patent? “Yes” is in favor
`
`vesA No
`
`of CloudofChange and “No”is in favor of NCR.
`
`If your answer belowto Claim | is “No” then do not answerthis question as to the
`remaining claims fromthe ‘012 patent but go on to Question No, 3.
`
`°012 Patent
`
`ve, No
`Claim 1:
`Claim 2: a No
`Claim 3:
`fh No
`Claim4:
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 4 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 5 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 5 of 9
`
`IL VALIDITY
`
`Directions - Questions Nos. 3&4
`
`In answering the Questions below, please check “Yes” or “No”for each listed asserted claim
`in the space provided.
`
`Question No. 3: Has NCR provenby clear and convincing evidence that the
`
`following asserted claims ofthe °640 Patent are invalid? “No”is in favor of
`
`CloudofChange and “Yes”is in favor of NCR.
`
`640 Patent
`
`Claim 13:
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 3:
`
`Claim 4:
`
`Claim 5:
`
`Claim 6:
`
`Claim 11:
`
`Claim 12:
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 5 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 6 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 6 of 9
`
`Question No. 4: Has NCR proven byclear and convincing evidence that the
`
`following asserted claimsof the °012 Patent are invalid? “No” is in favor of CloudofChange
`
`and “Yes” is in favor of NCR.
`
`Claim 9:
`
`7012Patent
`
`Claim 1:
`
`Claim 2:
`
`Claim 3:
`
`Claim 4:
`
`If you foundat least one claim of any asserted patentto be infringed and not invalid, proceed to
`answerthe following questionfor such patent(s). IF YOU FOUND THAT BOTH PATENTS
`WERENOT INFRINGED OR THAT ANY CLAIMS WERE INFRINGED BUT YOUR
`FOUND SUCH INFRINGED CLAIMS TO BE INVALID, YOU DO NOT NEED TO
`ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS AND CAN PROCEED TO THE LAST PAGE
`AND HAVE YOUR JURY FOREPERSON SIGN AND DATE THIS VERDICT FORM AND
`THEN DELIVER IT TO THE COURT SECURITY OFFICER. YOU SHOULD NOTPAY
`ATTENTION TO ANY OTHER INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THIS POINT AND THE
`SIGNATURE PAGE FOUND AT THE END OF THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`91624453v.1
`
`6
`
`CloudofChange 2012 6 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 7 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 7 of 9
`
`III. DAMAGES
`
`Directions — Question Nos. 5 and 6
`
`In answering Question No. 5 below, provide a dollar amount in the blank space.
`
`Question No. 5: Answerthe following question if there is at least one claim of the
`
`'640 Patent for which you answered “Yes” in Question No. | orat least one claim ofthe ‘O12
`
`Patent for which you answered “Yes” in Question No.2.
`
`What
`
`is the amount of damages you find CloudofChange has proven from a
`
`preponderance of the evidence for NCR’s infringement of the '640 Patent and/or the '012
`
`¢13 £00 G60.00
`
`Patent?
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 7 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 8 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 8 of 9
`
`Question No. 6: Answer the following question for the amount if any you found
`
`above as damages.
`
`Is the amount a reasonable royalty for infringement damagesup to the
`
`present or does it represent the amount of a lump sum amountfor the life ofthe patents.
`
`Yes_ XK _
`'012 Patent:
`
`Running Royalty
`
`OR
`
`Lump Sum
`
`IV. WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
`
`Directions — Question No. 7
`
`In answering the Questions below, please check “Yes” or “No” for eachlisted asserted patent in
`the space provided.
`
`Question No. 7: Answer the following question for eachpatent for which you found
`
`at least one claim infringed in Questions | and/or 2 above. Has CloudofChange proven by
`
`a preponderance ofthe evidence that NCR’s infringement was willful? “Yes” is in favor of
`
`CloudofChange and “No”is in favor of NCR.
`
`‘640 Patent:
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 8 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

`

`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 9 of 9
`Case 6:19-cv-00513-ADA Document 159 Filed 05/20/21 Page 9 of 9
`
`You have nowreached the end of the Verdict Form and should reviewit to ensure it
`
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. After youare satisfied that your unanimous
`
`answersare correctly reflected above, your Jury Foreperson should then sign and date this Verdict
`
`Form in the spaces below. Once that is done, notify the Court Security Officer that you have
`
`reached a verdict. The jury foreperson should retain possession ofthe verdict form and bring it
`
`whenthe jury is brought back into the courtroom.
`
`I certify that the jury unanimouslyconcurs in every element ofthe aboveverdict.
`
`Jury Foreperson
`
`91624453v.1
`
`CloudofChange 2012 9 of 9
`Clover Network, LLC v. CloudofChange, LLC
`IPR2023-00287
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket