IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`CLOUDOFCHANGE, LLC,
`
`Civil Action No. 6:22-cv-00634-ADA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CLOVER NETWORK, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DEFENDANT CLOVER NETWORK, INC.’S
`PRELIMINARY INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`
`I.
`
`II.
`
`III.
`
`IV.
`
`INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1
`
`RESERVATIONS................................................................................................................2
`
`GENERAL COMMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL ASSERTED PATENTS ...................3
`
`IDENTIFICATION OF PRIOR ART ..................................................................................4
`
`A.
`
`The ’640 Patent ........................................................................................................5
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Prior Art Patents / Patent Applications ........................................................5
`
`Non-Patent Literature...................................................................................6
`
`Additional Prior Art References ..................................................................6
`
`Product Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and (b) ...............................10
`
`B.
`
`The ’012 Patent ......................................................................................................12
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Prior Art Patents / Patent Applications ......................................................12
`
`Non-Patent Literature.................................................................................13
`
`Additional Prior Art References ................................................................14
`
`Product Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and (b) ...............................18
`
`C.
`
`The ’793 Patent ......................................................................................................19
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Prior Art Patents / Patent Applications ......................................................19
`
`Non-Patent Literature.................................................................................21
`
`Additional Prior Art References ................................................................21
`
`Product Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and (b) ...............................25
`
`V.
`
`VI.
`
`CLAIM CHARTS ..............................................................................................................27
`
`DISCLOSURE OF INVALIDITY DUE TO ANTICIPATION AND/OR
`OBVIOUSNESS ................................................................................................................27
`
`A.
`
`The Claimed Concepts Were Known ....................................................................28
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Software as a Subscription / Software as a Service (SaaS) (“SaaS
`References”) ...............................................................................................30
`
`Point of Sale Builder Tool POS Builder (“POS Builder References”) ......43
`
`Point of Sale Graphical User Interface (“POS GUI References”) .............81
`
`Remote Web Server (“Remote Web Server References”) .......................101
`
`Remote Manager that Can Access the Remote Web Server From
`Anywhere (“Remote Manager References”) ...........................................130
`
`Browser Access to Point of Sale Screens (“Browser References”) .........148
`
`Operating Point of Sale Terminals Independent of Remote Server
`(“Independent Terminals References”) ....................................................159
`
`

`

`B.
`
`Obviousness Combinations ..................................................................................167
`
`1.
`
`’640 Patent ...............................................................................................167
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`Woycik Alone or in Combination With One or More SaaS
`References ....................................................................................168
`
`Manno alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References ....................................................................................172
`
`Tengler alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References and one or more SaaS References .............................176
`
`Cusack alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References and one or more SaaS References .............................183
`
`Olson alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References ....................................................................................191
`
`Lukkari alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References and one or more SaaS References .............................195
`
`Flashpoint alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References and one or more POS Builder References and
`one or more SaaS References and one or more Browser References
`......................................................................................................202
`
`Halo alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References ....................................................................................213
`
`InfoGenesis alone or in combination with one or more POS
`Builder References and one or more Browser References ..........217
`
`Simphony alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References ....................................................................................223
`
`Squirrel alone or in combination with one or more Remote
`Manager References and one or more SaaS References and one or
`more POS Builder References and one or more Browser
`References ....................................................................................227
`
`2.
`
`’012 Patent ...............................................................................................238
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`Manno alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References ....................................................................................240
`
`Tengler alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References and one or more Browser References .......................245
`
`Cusack alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References ....................................................................................251
`
`Cusack alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References and one or more Independent Terminals References 256
`
`Olson alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References ....................................................................................264
`
`

`

`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`k.
`
`l.
`
`Lukkari alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References and one or more Independent Terminals References 269
`
`Flashpoint alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References and one or more Browser References ............276
`
`Halo alone or in combination with one or more Independent
`Terminals References...................................................................281
`
`NextPOS alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References and one or more Browser References and one or
`more Independent Terminals References .....................................285
`
`Point of Success alone or in combination with one or more Remote
`Web Server References and one or more Browser References and
`one or more Independent Terminals References .........................294
`
`InfoGenesis alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References ....................................................................................303
`
`Squirrel alone or in combination with one or more POS GUI
`References and one or more Remote Web Server References and
`one or more Browser References and one or more Independent
`Terminals References...................................................................307
`
`3.
`
`’793 Patent ...............................................................................................320
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`Tengler alone or in combination with one or more Browser
`References ....................................................................................321
`
`Olson alone or in combination with one or more Browser
`References ....................................................................................323
`
`Flashpoint alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References and one or more Browser References ............326
`
`Halo alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References ........................................................................333
`
`Phoenix alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References and one or more Remote Web Server References ....337
`
`InfoGenesis alone or in combination with one or more Remote
`Web Server References and one or more Browser References ...344
`
`Simphony alone or in combination with one or more POS Builder
`References and one or more Remote Web Server References and
`one or more Browser References .................................................350
`
`Squirrel alone or in combination with one or more Remote Web
`Server References and one or more Browser References ............360
`
`VII.
`
`SECONDARY CONSIDERATIONS .............................................................................366
`
`VIII. ON-SALE BAR ...............................................................................................................368
`
`IX.
`
`CONTENTIONS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 112 ....................................................................368
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard .....................................................................................................369
`
`

`

`1.
`
`2.
`
`Written Description and Enablement .......................................................369
`
`Indefiniteness ...........................................................................................371
`
`B.
`
`The Asserted Claims ............................................................................................372
`
`1.
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’640 Patent Lack Written Description and/or
`Enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 ...................................................372
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`Claim 1 .........................................................................................372
`
`Claim 3 .........................................................................................373
`
`Claim 5 .........................................................................................374
`
`Claim 6 .........................................................................................376
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’012 Patent Lack Written Description and/or
`Enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 ...................................................376
`
`a.
`
`Claim 1 .........................................................................................376
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’793 Patent Lack Written Description and/or
`Enablement under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1 ...................................................377
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Claim 1 .........................................................................................377
`
`Claim 4 .........................................................................................378
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’640 Patent are Indefinite under 35 U.S.C. §
`112, ¶ 2 .....................................................................................................378
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`Claim 1 .........................................................................................379
`
`Claim 3 .........................................................................................380
`
`Claim 5 .........................................................................................381
`
`Claim 6 .........................................................................................382
`
`Claim 8 .........................................................................................382
`
`Claim 9 .........................................................................................383
`
`Claim 10 .......................................................................................383
`
`Claim 11 .......................................................................................383
`
`Claim 12 .......................................................................................383
`
`5.
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’012 Patent are Indefinite under 35 U.S.C. §
`112, ¶ 2 .....................................................................................................384
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`Claim 1 .........................................................................................384
`
`Claim 2 .........................................................................................385
`
`Claim 4 .........................................................................................386
`
`6.
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’793 Patent are Indefinite under 35 U.S.C. §
`112, ¶ 2 .....................................................................................................386
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`Claims 1, 42, 44 ...........................................................................386
`
`Claim 3 .........................................................................................387
`
`

`

`X.
`
`CONTENTIONS UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101 ....................................................................388
`
`A.
`
`B.
`
`The Asserted Claims Are Abstract Ideas Under Alice Step One .........................390
`
`The Asserted Claims, Alone or In Combination, Do Not Include An Inventive
`Concept Sufficient to Transform the Claimed Abstract Idea Into a Patent-Eligible
`Application Under Alice Step Two ......................................................................392
`
`
`
`

`

`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s October 24, 2022 Scheduling Order (D.I. 17), Defendant Clover
`
`Network, LLC1 (“Clover” or “Defendant”) hereby serves its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions
`
`(“Preliminary Invalidity Contentions”) with respect to the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No.
`
`9,400,640 (“the ’640 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 10,083,012 (“the ’012 patent”), and U.S. Patent
`
`No. 11,226,793 (“the ’793 patent”) (the “Asserted Patents”), identified by CloudofChange, LLC
`
`(“CloudofChange”) in CloudofChange’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions, served on
`
`September 30, 2022 (“Preliminary Infringement Contentions”).
`
`In its Preliminary Infringement Contentions, CloudofChange has asserted the following
`
`claims (the “Asserted Claims”) against Clover:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`’640 patent: Claims 1, 3, 5-6, and 8-14
`
`’012 patent: Claims 1-2, 4, and 6-13
`
`’793 patent: Claims 1-4, 9, 11, 42, and 44
`
`With respect to each asserted claim and based on its investigation to date, Clover:
`
`(a) identifies each item of prior art that anticipates each asserted claim or renders it obvious;
`
`(b) explains why the prior art anticipates and/or renders obvious each asserted claim, and
`
`identifies any combinations of prior art showing obviousness; (c) submits charts specifically
`
`identifying where and how in each item of prior art each limitation of each asserted claim is
`
`found;2 (d) identifies the grounds of invalidity based on indefiniteness or lacking written
`
`1 Clover Network, Inc. converted to Clover Network, LLC in 2021.
`2 These Preliminary Invalidity Contentions cite to the pre-AIA versions of 35 U.S.C. §§ 101,
`102, 103, and 112.
`
`

`

`description under 35 U.S.C. § 112; and (e) identifies the grounds of invalidity based on 35
`
`U.S.C. § 101.3
`
`II.
`
`RESERVATIONS
`
`Clover reserves the right to revise its contentions depending upon the Court’s
`
`constructions of the asserted claims. Clover reserves to revise its contentions depending upon
`
`CloudofChange’s final infringement contentions, and/or any subsequent infringement
`
`contentions CloudofChange is allowed to serve in this case. Clover notes that discovery has not
`
`yet commenced in this case, and reserves the right to supplement its Preliminary Invalidity
`
`Contentions based on any information identified during discovery. Clover also expressly
`
`reserves the right to supplement its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions with third-party
`
`documents produced after the Preliminary Invalidity Contentions deadline. Clover further
`
`reserves the right to supplement its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions with third-party
`
`deposition testimony taken and third-party declarations provided after the Preliminary Invalidity
`
`Contentions deadline.
`
`The aforementioned reservations and general comments apply to all charts referenced in
`
`Clover’s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, including the attached Exhibits.
`
`
`
`
`
`3 The Asserted Patents all share the same specification. A citation to one Asserted Patent should
`be understood as also including a citation to the analogous portion of any other Asserted Patent.
`
`

`

`III. GENERAL COMMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL ASSERTED PATENTS
`
`The Supreme Court has held that “[t]he combination of familiar elements according to
`
`known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results.”
`
`KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 416 (2007). “When a work is available in one field
`
`of endeavor, design incentives and other market forces can prompt variations of it, either in the
`
`same field or a different one.” Id. at 417. As the Supreme Court made clear, “[f]or the same
`
`reason, if a technique has been used to improve one device, and a POSITA would have
`
`recognized that it would improve similar devices in the same way, using the technique is obvious
`
`unless its actual application is beyond his or her skill.” Id.
`
`To determine whether there is an apparent reason to combine the known elements in the
`
`fashion claimed by the patent at issue, a court can “look to interrelated teachings of multiple
`
`patents; the effects of demands known to the design community or present in the marketplace;
`
`and the background knowledge possessed by a person having ordinary skill in the art.” Id. at
`
`418. For example, obviousness can be demonstrated by showing “there existed at the time of
`
`invention a known problem for which there was an obvious solution encompassed by the patent’s
`
`claims.” Id. at 420. “[A]ny need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of
`
`invention and addressed by the patent can provide a reason for combining the elements in the
`
`manner claimed.” Id. Common sense also teaches that “familiar items may have obvious uses
`
`beyond their primary purposes, and in many cases a person of ordinary skill will be able to fit the
`
`teachings of multiple patents together like pieces of a puzzle.” Id.
`
`Thus, the motivation to combine the teachings of the prior art references disclosed herein
`
`is found in the references themselves and/or: (1) the nature of the problem being solved; (2) the
`
`express, implied and inherent teachings of the prior art; (3) the knowledge of persons of ordinary
`
`skill in the art; (4) the fact that the prior art is generally directed towards the same or similar
`
`

`

`problems; and/or (5) the predictable results obtained in combining the different elements of the
`
`prior art.
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`The foregoing general comments are relevant to how a person of ordinary skill in the art
`
`(“POSITA”) at the time of the alleged invention of the Asserted Patents would have understood
`
`prior art references in the field of the Asserted Patents, and also relevant to which concepts a
`
`POSITA would have deemed obvious—both for single-reference obviousness and obviousness
`
`combinations.
`
`IV. IDENTIFICATION OF PRIOR ART
`
`In addition to the disclosures provided below, Clover attaches separate charts detailing its
`
`invalidity contentions on a claim-by-claim basis. (See Exs. A-’640-01 through A-’640-21, B-
`
`’012-01 through B-’012-21, and C-’793-01 through C-’793-21). Moreover, Clover hereby
`
`discloses and reserves the right to rely upon all references incorporated by reference into the
`
`references disclosed below and in the accompanying charts.4 For the avoidance of doubt (where
`
`not separately identified), identification of a granted patent by patent number also identifies the
`
`corresponding publication numbers and provisional application numbers.
`
`
`
`
`
`4 To the extent a cited reference is found not to predate the Asserted Patents for which it is cited,
`it remains relevant, for example, to show the technological background and/or objective indicia
`of obviousness and/or obviousness based on simultaneous/contemporaneous invention by others.
`
`

`

`A.
`
`The ’640 Patent
`
`1.
`
`Prior Art Patents / Patent Applications
`
`The following prior art patents and patent applications, including those references listed
`
`in Exs. A-’640-01 through A-’640-10, anticipate and/or render obvious the asserted claims of the
`
`’640 patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`No. Patent No. / Application No.
`
`1. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2004/0128199 (“Cusack”)
`2. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2004/0181454 (“Manno”)
`3. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2005/0021409 (“Michaud”)
`4. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2005/0049921 (“Tengler”)
`5. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2005/0182680 (“Jones”)
`6. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2007/0038727 (“Bailey”)
`7. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2007/0175992 (“Brown”)
`8. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2007/0265935 (“Woycik”)
`9. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2007/0276763 (“Kleinman”)
`10. U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2008/0208696 (“Olson”)
`11. U.S. Patent No. 5,897,622
`(“Blinn I”)
`12. U.S. Patent No. 6,058,373
`(“Blinn II”)
`13. U.S. Patent No. 6,920,431
`(“Showghi”)
`14. U.S. Patent No. 6,982,733
`(“McNally”)
`
`Country of
`Origin
`United States
`
`United States
`
`United States
`
`United States
`
`United States
`
`United States
`
`Date Issued
`/ Published
`July 1, 2004 CLOVER
`000203
`CLOVER
`Sept. 16,
`000221
`2004
`CLOVER
`Jan. 27,
`000237
`2005
`United States Mar. 3, 2005 CLOVER
`000248
`CLOVER
`United States Aug. 18,
`000285
`2005
`CLOVER
`Feb. 15,
`000321
`2007
`United States Aug. 2, 2007 CLOVER
`000351
`CLOVER
`United States Nov. 15,
`000410
`2007
`CLOVER
`United States Nov. 29,
`000448
`2007
`CLOVER
`United States Aug. 28,
`000460
`2008
`CLOVER
`United States Apr. 27,
`000468
`1999
`United States May 2, 2000 CLOVER
`000501
`CLOVER
`July 19,
`000542
`2005
`Jan. 3, 2006 CLOVER
`000563
`
`Bates No. Chart
`
`A-’640-
`01
`A-’640-
`02
`A-’640-
`03
`A-’640-
`04
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`06
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`07
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`08
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`05
`A-’640-
`09
`
`

`

`No. Patent No. / Application No.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`International Application
`Publication WO 01/065427
`(“Costello”)
`International Application
`Publication WO 02/039226
`(“Thompson”)
`International Application
`Publication WO 03/065178
`(“Redmond”)
`JP 2004-164194A
`(“Nakamura”)
`
`Country of
`Origin
`WIPO
`(Australia)
`
`WIPO
`(United
`States)
`WIPO
`(United
`States)
`Japan
`
`Bates No. Chart
`
`Date Issued
`/ Published
`Sept. 7, 2001 CLOVER
`000583
`
`A-’640-
`05
`
`May 16,
`2002
`
`CLOVER
`000617
`
`A-’640-
`05
`
`Aug. 2, 2003 CLOVER
`000668
`
`A-’640-
`05
`
`June 10,
`2004
`
`A-’640-
`10
`
`CLOVER
`000697;
`CLOVER
`000727
`
`2.
`
`Non-Patent Literature
`
`The following prior art publication(s), including those publications listed in Ex. A-’640-
`
`11 anticipate and/or render obvious the asserted claims of the ’640 patent.
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Mar. 25,
`2004
`
`Author or
`Publisher
`Lukkari
`
`Bates
`No.
`CLOVE
`R
`000752
`
`Chart
`
`A-’640-
`11
`
`No.
`
`Title
`
`Lukkari et
`al.,SmartRestaurant-Mobile
`Payments in Context-Aware
`Environment, Proceedings of
`the 6th International
`Conference on Electronic
`Commerce, ICEC 2004, Delft,
`The Netherlands, October 25-
`27, 2004,
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1052
`220.1052293 (Mar. 25, 2004)
`(“Lukkari”)
`
`1.
`
`
`
`3.
`
`Additional Prior Art References
`
`The following references may be relied upon to demonstrate the state of the art and/or the
`
`knowledge of a POSITA as it relates to the ’640 patent in the relevant timeframe:
`
`All documents cited on the face of the ’640 patent and related patents, patent
`
`publications, file histories, and applications, as well as:
`
`

`

`No.
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`14.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Title
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Oct. 19,
`U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2006
`2006/0235755 (“Mueller”)
`May 22,
`United Kingdom Patent Application
`2002
`GB2369201 (“Tomlinson”)
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,818,428 (“Eisenbrandt”) Oct. 6, 1998 n/a
`
`Author or
`Publisher
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2002/0194074 (“Jacobs”)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,051,091 (“Cohen”)
`
`Dec. 19,
`2002
`May 23,
`2006
`U.S. Patent No. 6,384,850 (“McNally”) May 7, 2002 n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,002,395 (“Wagner”)
`
`U.S. Patent Publication No.
`2007/0175992 (“Brown”)
`U.S. Patent No. 6,247,032 (“Bernardo”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,364,845 (“Richter”)
`
`Chieh-Chou Chou, Morder-Server Food
`Service, Cal. State U.
`Sam Chung, et al., Service-Oriented
`Software Reengineering: SoSR,
`Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii
`International Conference on System
`Sciences
`Crystal Point Restaurant Technology
`Unleashed,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2007122308
`4216/http://crystalpointpos.com:80/
`DiamondTouch,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2007011319
`5521/http://www.diamondtouchpos.com/
`Hospitality Technology, Pilot Issue
`
`John Jesitus, Wireless Technology Keeps
`Customers In Order, Hospitality
`Technology
`JP 2004-234394A
`
`JP 2004-310679
`
`Bates No.
`
`CLOVER
`004570
`CLOVER
`004771
`CLOVER
`004791
`CLOVER
`004319
`CLOVER
`004202
`CLOVER
`000563
`CLOVER
`004808
`CLOVER
`000351
`CLOVER
`003726
`CLOVER
`003950
`CLOVER
`003273
`CLOVER
`003396
`
`Dec. 14,
`1999
`Aug. 2,
`2007
`June 12,
`2001
`Jan. 29,
`2013
`Mar. 2004
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`Cal. State U.
`
`2007
`
`IEEE
`
`Dec. 23,
`2007
`
`Crystal Point
`
`CLOVER
`003406
`
`Jan. 13,
`2007
`
`DiamondTouch CLOVER
`003408
`
`Jan. 1997
`
`Jan. 1997
`
`Hospitality
`Technology
`Hospitality
`Technology
`
`Aug. 19,
`2004
`Nov. 4,
`2004
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`CLOVER
`002082
`CLOVER
`003409
`
`CLOVER
`003417
`CLOVER
`003467
`
`

`

`No.
`
`19.
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Title
`
`JP 2009-075745
`
`T. Ojala, SmartRotuaari – Context-aware
`Mobile Multimedia Services
`KR 2003-0088637A
`
`LivePOS,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2008101109
`0143/http://www.livepos.com/
`LivePOS Cloud Point of Sale Solutions -
`About LivePOS,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2012022211
`3856/http://www.livepos.com:80/2012/li
`nks/aboutus.aspx
`LivePOS Cloud Point of Sale Solutions -
`Features,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2012022223
`1941/http://www.livepos.com:80/2012/Li
`nks/features.aspx
`POS Software Showcase ’07
`
`pcAmerica,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2007020214
`5449/http://www.pcamerica.com:80/resta
`urant_pos_systems.html
`pcAmerica,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2007020214
`5412/http://www.pcamerica.com:80/resta
`urant_POS_screen_shots.htm
`pcAmerica,
`https://web.archive.org/web/2007021200
`4913/http://www.pcamerica.com:80/pos_
`products_features_restaurant_features.ht
`ml
`Norshahril Bin Abu Talib, Executive
`Restaurant Order System, University
`College of Engineering and Technology
`U.S. Patent No. 5,696,909
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,912,743
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,937,041
`
`Date of
`Publication
`April 9,
`2009
`2003
`
`Nov. 20,
`2003
`Oct. 11,
`2008
`
`
`
`
`
`Author or
`Publisher
`n/a
`
`ACM
`
`n/a
`
`LivePOS
`
`LivePOS
`
`Bates No.
`
`CLOVER
`003475
`CLOVER
`003492
`CLOVER
`003502
`CLOVER
`003536
`
`CLOVER
`003533
`
`LivePOS
`
`CLOVER
`003534
`
`2007
`
`Hospitality
`Technology
`Feb. 2, 2007 pcAmerica
`
`Feb. 2, 2007 pcAmerica
`
`CLOVER
`002061
`CLOVER
`002073
`
`CLOVER
`002075
`
`Feb. 12,
`2007
`
`pcAmerica
`
`CLOVER
`002073
`
`Nov. 2005
`
`Dec. 9,
`1997
`June 15,
`1999
`Aug. 10,
`1999
`
`Universiti
`Malaysia
`Pahang
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`CLOVER
`003632
`
`CLOVER
`003656
`CLOVER
`003668
`CLOVER
`003709
`
`

`

`No.
`
`Title
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,401,074
`
`Author or
`Date of
`Publisher
`Publication
`June 4, 2002 n/a
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`37.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`42.
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,174,312
`
`Feb. 6, 2007 n/a
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,472,394
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,711,100
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,721,969
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,810,723
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,841,514
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,845,554
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,032,414
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,146,077
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,595,061
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,009,060
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,131,012
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,269,082
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,679,320
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,747,651
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,664,826
`
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2001/0037206A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2001/0037245A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2001/0047302A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2002/0059405A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2002/0095342A1
`
`n/a
`
`Dec. 30,
`2008
`May 4, 2010 n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`May 25,
`2010
`Oct. 12,
`2010
`Nov. 30,
`2010
`Dec. 7,
`2010
`Oct. 4, 2011 n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`Mar. 27,
`2012
`Nov. 26,
`2013
`Apr. 14,
`2015
`Sept. 8,
`2015
`Feb. 23,
`2016
`June 13,
`2017
`Aug. 29,
`2017
`May 26,
`2020
`Nov. 1,
`2001
`Nov. 1,
`2001
`Nov. 29,
`2001
`May 16,
`2002
`July 18,
`2002
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`Bates No.
`
`CLOVER
`003785
`CLOVER
`003815
`CLOVER
`003854
`CLOVER
`003869
`CLOVER
`003880
`CLOVER
`003900
`CLOVER
`003914
`CLOVER
`003950
`CLOVER
`003914
`CLOVER
`004018
`CLOVER
`004040
`CLOVER
`004060
`CLOVER
`004085
`CLOVER
`004107
`CLOVER
`004121
`CLOVER
`004159
`CLOVER
`004182
`CLOVER
`004216
`CLOVER
`004232
`CLOVER
`004248
`CLOVER
`004290
`CLOVER
`004305
`
`

`

`No.
`
`Title
`
`55.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`58.
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`61.
`
`62.
`
`63.
`
`64.
`
`65.
`
`66.
`
`67.
`
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2003/0078843A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2003/0120546A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2003/0220841A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2004/0205023A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2006/0085265A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2006/0111983A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2006/0235755A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2007/0005685A1
`U.S. Patent App. Pub. No.
`2013/0110656A1
`P.L. Venetianer, et al., Video Verification
`of Point of Sale Transactions,
`ObjectVideo, Inc.
`Norbert Weibenberg, et al., Using
`Ontologies in Personalized Mobile
`Applications, GIS’04 (Nov. 12-13, 2004)
`Joyce A. Young, The Web as an E-
`Commerce Medium, Indiana State
`University,
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J049v14n01_02
`International App. Pub.
`WO2005/115074A2
`
`Author or
`Publisher
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`Date of
`Publication
`Apr. 24,
`2003
`June 26,
`2003
`Nov. 27,
`2003
`Oct. 14,
`2004
`Apr. 20,
`2006
`May 25,
`2006
`Oct. 19,
`2006
`Jan. 4, 2007 n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`n/a
`
`May 2, 2013 n/a
`
`2007
`
`IEEE
`
`2004
`
`ACM
`
`Dec. 2006
`
`Journal of
`Marketing
`Channels
`
`Dec. 8,
`2005
`
`n/a
`
`Bates No.
`
`CLOVER
`004350
`CLOVER
`004383
`CLOVER
`004401
`CLOVER
`004449
`CLOVER
`004487
`CLOVER
`004517
`CLOVER
`004570
`CLOVER
`004604
`CLOVER
`004631
`CLOVER
`004654
`
`CLOVER
`004660
`
`CLOVER
`004719
`
`CLOVER
`004670
`
`4.
`
`Product Prior Art Under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(a) and (b)
`
`Clover also contends that the ’640 patent is invalid in view of public knowledge and uses
`
`and/or offers for sale or sales of products and services that are prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)
`
`or (b) that anticipate and/or render obvious the asserted claims at least when applying
`
`CloudofChange’s apparent interpretation of the claims in its Initial Infringement Contentions.
`
`Clover’s investigation of these sources of prior art is ongoing. The following lists each item of
`
`prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a), and/or (b), by the name of the item and, to the extent now
`
`

`

`known, when the item became publicly known or was used, offered for sale, or sold. Clover
`
`contends that the below are stated on information and belief, and are supported by the
`
`information and documents that will be produced by Clover and/or third parties. Clover
`
`continues to investigate these events and reserves the right to add additional prior art products
`
`and services and/or to rely on additional documents or portions of documents describing the
`
`products and services below.
`
`• The 21st Century Restaurant system, which was used, offered for sale, or sold before Feb.
`
`5, 2008, Ex. A-’640-12.
`
`• The Flashpoint POS system, which was used, offered for sale, or sold before Feb. 5,
`
`2008, Ex. A-’640-13.
`
`• The Halo system, which was us