throbber
Robert Stillerman
`1636 Madrono Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94306
`
`Cell phone: 209-483-4800
`Email: bob@rsic.biz
`
`Litigation Support and Related Experience
`
`Type of Matter:
`IPR
`Kramer Alberti
`Law Firm:
`Petitioner: Google LLC; Patent Owner: Wildseed Mobile LLC
`Case Name:
`Retained by Patent Owner to respond to IPR.
`Services:
`Ongoing
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Jul 2023
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Technology Dispute
`Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP
`Yuzz Buzz v. SpringBig, 50-2022-CA-005163-XXXX- MB,15th Judicial Circuit Court of
`Palm Beach County, Florida
`Retained by defendant to assess costs of providing licensed technology.
`Services:
`Ongoing
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Jun 2023
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Patent Infringement
`Bragalone Olejko Saad PC
`Stingray IP Solutions v. Amazon, 2:21-cv-00201-JRG, E. District of Texas
`Retained by Plaintiff to assess possible infringement by Defendant’s use of 802.11,
`Zigbee, Z-Wave.
`Settled
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Apr 2022
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Patent Infringement
`Kramer Alberti
`Wildseed Mobile LLC v. Google and Youtube, 6:22-cv-00357-ADA, W. District of Texas
`Retained by Plaintiff to assess possible infringement regarding internet advertising,
`recommendations and “hot links.” Deposed for claim construction opinions.
`Ongoing
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Mar 2022
`
`Type of Matter:
`Patent Infringement
`Kramer Alberti
`Law Firm:
`AudienceScience v. Google and Youtube, 6:21-cv-1209, W. District of Texas
`Case Name:
`Retained by Plaintiff to assess possible infringement regarding internet advertising
`Services:
`Ongoing
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Mar 2022
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
`DLA Piper LLP
`Century Interactive v. Reid Wakefield and Tone Systems, DC-21-03702, Dallas County
`District Court
`Retained by Plaintiff to assess possible trade secret misappropriation involving call
`management software.
`Settled
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Mar 2022
`
`Services:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`
`Patent Infringement
`Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
`WSOU Investments v Salesforce, 6:20-cv-1163 through 1172-ADA, W. District of Texas
`Retained by patent holder to assess possible infringement by the Defendant through
`their cloud-based software.
`Ongoing
`
`Wildseed Mobile EX2008
`Google v. Wildseed Mobile
`IPR2023-00244
`
`

`

`Date (of retention): Dec 2021
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Patent Infringement
`DiNovo Price LLP
`KlausTech v Google, 4:20-CV-04459-JSW, N. District of California
`Retained by patent holder to assess possible infringement by the Defendant through
`their advertising software.
`Settled
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Aug 2021
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Trade Secrets Misappropriation
`Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP
`Sprint v Charter, 2:20-CV-02161-JWB-TJJ, District Of Kansas
`Retained to investigate Charter’s use of Sprint’s Trade Secrets with respect to its Voice
`over IP implementation, on behalf of Sprint.
`Settled
`Disposition:
`Date (of retention): Apr 2021
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`IPR Petition
`Edmonds & Schlather PLLC
`Petition for Inter Partes Review
`Rebuttal of Apple’s petition to institute a review of three patents related to Portable
`electronic devices and switching devices
`IPR instituted
`Feb 2021
`
`Breach of Contract, Negligent Misrepresentation
`Brown Rudnick LLP
`Alorica v Fortinet, 19CV344971, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
`Analysis of Call Center and Data Center technologies and practices
`In litigation
`Dec 2020
`
`Patent infringement
`confidential
`confidential
`Analysis of mobile device accessories
`Unknown
`Mar 2020
`
`Contract dispute
`Ropes & Gray
`TA v. COMDATA et al, 12954-CB, Chancery of the State of Delaware
`Analysis of an RFID System installation on behalf of plaintiff.
`Verdict in favor of plaintiff
`Feb 2017
`
`Contract dispute
`Witten Law
`Ampro Computers v. LXE, 1:13-CV-01937-LPS, Northern District of Delaware
`Requirements analysis, fulfillment of contractual obligations relating to a tablet computer.
`Settled
`Aug 2016
`
`Patent infringement
`Alston & Bird
`Verint v. Red Box Recorders, 1:14-cv-05403-KBF-GWG, Southern District of New York
`Invalidity analysis of patents relating to call monitoring and recording. Deposed.
`Settled
`Aug 2015
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Page 2 of 13
`
`

`

`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Patent infringement
`DLA Piper LLP
`Fortinet v. Sophos, 14-cv-00100-GMS, District of Delaware
`Infringement and validity analysis of patents relating to network management on behalf
`of Sophos. Deposed.
`Settled
`Aug 2015
`
`Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Hacking
`Foley Hoag LLP
`Telesocial v. Orange, 3:14-CV-03985-JD, Northern District of California
`Analysis of software, log files and system architectures and operation on behalf of
`defendant. Deposed; testified at trial.
`Jury verdict favorable to defendant
`Aug 2015
`
`Patent infringement
`Baker Botts
`Metaswitch Networks v GENBAND, 2:14-cv-744-JRG-RSP, Eastern District of Texas,
`Marshall Division
`Non-Infringement and invalidity analysis of patents relating to communications systems
`and networks on behalf of defendant. Deposed, testified at trial.
`Defendant was found not to infringe; patents were found to be invalid. Court cited my
`testimony in upholding the jury verdict upon appeal.
`May 2015
`
`Patent infringement
`DLA Piper LLP
`Fortinet v. Sophos, 3:13-cv-05831-EMC, Northern District of California, San Francisco
`Division
`Infringement and validity analysis of patents relating to security systems on behalf of
`Sophos in counterclaim. Deposed.
`Settled
`May 2015
`
`Copyright, infringement, unfair competition, CFAA violations
`Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
`Craigslist v 3TAPS, CV-12-03816 CRB, Northern District of California, San Francisco
`Division
`Analyzed alleged “web scraping” activities by 3TAPS.
`Settled
`Apr 2015
`
`Inter Partes Review of Patent
`Ropes & Gray LLP
`Confidential client
`Analyzed and wrote report on the patentability of an issued patent relating to message
`notification.
`Settled
`Jan 2015
`
`Patent infringement
`Greenberg Traurig LLP
`MTEL v. Amazon, 2:13-CV-883-JRG-RSP, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`Non infringement and invalidity analysis of patents relating to tracking on behalf of
`defendant. Deposed.
`Settled
`Dec 2014
`
`Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
`Carr & Ferrell LLP
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 13
`
`

`

`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`Robert Stillerman
`
`AgJunction v. Agrian et al, 2:14-CV-2069, District of Kansas
`Source code analysis, hard drive forensic analysis on behalf of Plaintiff, deposed,
`testified at preliminary injunction hearing before the judge.
`Court ruling did not extend injunction.
`May 2014
`
`Negligence
`Lombardi, Loper & Conant
`National Railroad Passenger Corporation v John Davis Trucking, Case No. 3:11-CV-
`00461-HDM-VPC, District of Nevada
`Analysis of file metadata on behalf of NPRC to demonstrate the accuracy of a video file
`in evidence
`Jury found in favor of NPRC, based on the accuracy of the video file in evidence.
`Mar 2014
`
`Patent infringement
`Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
`MTEL v. Apple, 2:13-CV-258-JRG-RSP, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
`Non infringement and invalidity analysis of two patents relating to tracking and
`messaging on behalf of defendant. Deposed, testified at trial.
`Jury found that Apple did not infringe the patent I testified to at trial.
`Nov 2013
`
`Patent infringement
`Alston & Bird
`MTEL v. UPS, 1:12-CV-03222-AT, Northern District of Georgia
`Non infringement and invalidity analysis of a patent relating to tracking technology on
`behalf of defendant. Deposed
`Unknown
`Oct 2013
`
`Wrongful Termination
`Mesirow and Fink
`Zhu v. Intel. 112-CV-219940, Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
`Analysis of thermal and performance characteristics of microprocessors on behalf of
`Plaintiff
`Settled
`Sep 2013
`
`Patent infringement
`Bunsow & DeMory LLP
`NXP v. Research in Motion. 6:12-CV-498-ACC-TBS, Middle District of Florida
`Validity analysis of a patent relating to 802.11 technology on behalf of Plaintiff
`Judgment in favor of defendant
`Aug 2013
`
`Patent infringement
`Bunsow & DeMory LLP
`Cassidian v. MicroData et al. 2:12-CV-162-JRG, Eastern District of Texas
`Validity analysis of an emergency services call routing patent on behalf of Plaintiff.
`Deposed, testified at trial.
`Jury verdict in favor of defendant
`Dec 2012
`
`Product Defect
`Affeld Grivakes Zucker LLP
`Flextronics et al v. US Merchants Financial, 72 117 Y 00973 11 American Arbitration
`Association
`Evaluate tablet computer for product defects on behalf of defendant.
`Settled
`Oct 2012
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 13
`
`

`

`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Breach of contract
`Greenberg Traurig, LLP
`Intralot v Gibson Technical Services, 30 494 Y 00429 11 American Arbitration
`Association
`Analyze WiMax installation in light of contract obligations on behalf of defendant..
`Deposed.
`Settled
`May 2012
`
`Negligence
`Attorney, City of Los Angeles
`Sprint Communications v City of Los Angeles, PC 050518, CA Superior Court, Los
`Angeles-North Valley District
`Assess damages in Optical Fiber loss of service on behalf of defendant.
`Settled
`May 2012
`
`Patent infringement
`Bunsow & DeMory LLP
`Plant v Intrado 2:09-CV-395, Eastern District of Texas
`Infringement and validity analysis of an emergency services call routing patent on behalf
`of Plaintiff. Deposed.
`Settled
`Apr 2012
`
`Legal Malpractice
`Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
`Muench v McQuiller, CGC-11-515544, San Francisco Superior Court
`Fax transmission investigation on behalf of defendant. Deposed.
`Settled
`Apr 2012
`
`Trade Secrets
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`Brocade v. A10 Networks 5:10-CV-03428-LHK, Northern District of California
`Forensic examination of hard drive images on behalf of defendant.. Deposed.
`Settled
`Apr 2012
`
`Patent infringement
`Law offices of Stafford Davis
`Pre-litigation
`Investigate possible infringers of a web site technology
`Unknown
`Apr 2012
`
`Trade Secrets
`Morgan Lewis Bockius
`Ajaxo v Etrade 1-00DV-793529, Santa Clara Country Superior Court
`Forensic examination. Testified at trial regarding hard drive examination.
`Unknown
`Feb 2012
`
`Patent infringement
`Cantor Colburn LLP
`multiple cases and defendants
`Examine possible infringement of email related patent
`Settled
`2011 – 2014
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 13
`
`

`

`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Patent Infringement
`Quinn Emanuel
`Tarkus Imaging v. Adobe. C.A. No. 1: 10-CV-00063-JJF, US District Court, District of
`Delaware
`Source code examination of imaging technologies and algorithms on behalf of Plaintiff
`Unknown
`Jul 2011
`
`Wrongful Death
`Ericksen Arbuthnot LLP
`confidential client
`Examination of cellular devices and records on behalf of defendant.
`Settled
`Nov 2010
`
`Dispute
`Terra Law LLP
`confidential client
`Investigate cable system installation against standards on behalf of Plaintiff.
`Settled
`Oct 2010
`
`Theft of confidential information
`The Law Offices of Michael Ackerman
`Worldwide Transportation v. Restivo Enterprises, 107-CV-09-7723, California Superior
`Court, Santa Clara County
`Investigate customer data on server on behalf of defendant. Provided deposition
`testimony.
`Favorable settlement to defendant reached, citing my testimony as key factor
`May 2010
`
`Corporate client
`Cooley Godward Kronish
`Corporate client
`Perform forensic backup of computer hard drives
`Backups completed, pending analysis as required.
`Feb 2010
`
`Criminal
`Bragg, Perlman, Russ, Stunich & Eads LLP
`People v. Belles
`Forensic analysis of cell phone data on behalf of defendant.
`Plea agreement reached prior to trial
`Apr 2009
`
`Patent Infringement
`Hosie Rice LLP
`Confidential Client
`Investigate potential infringement of client’s patent by other software companies, on
`behalf of Plaintiff
`Unknown
`Mar 2009
`
`Theft of Trade Secret
`The Law Offices of Christopher W. Sweeney
`Martone and Martone Radio Technology v. Burgess et al, C-08-02379 CW, N. District of
`California, Oakland Division
`Investigate alleged theft of trade secrets in computer source code on behalf of defendant
`Settled
`Dec 2008
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 13
`
`

`

`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Patent Infringement
`Carr & Ferrell LLP and Hosie Rice LLP
`Cloakworks, Inc. v. Cloakware, Inc., 08-CV-0244-WHA, N. District of California, San
`Francisco Division
`Investigate Cloakware applications for alleged infringement of Cloakworks patent on
`behalf of Plaintiff
`Settled
`Aug 2008
`
`Audit of Settlement Agreement
`Hogan Holmes & Usoz LLP
`Fitech Laboratories v. GridGain Systems LLC. 1-08-CV-116843, Superior Court of the
`State of California
`Audit of computer systems and telephone records for compliance with settlement
`agreement between the parties. Provided deposition and Court testimony.
`Settled
`
`May 2008
`
`Patent infringement
`Leydig, Voit & Mayer
`Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation, 07-CV-2213 RGK (FFMx) and 2:07-
`ML-01816 B RGK (FFMx), US District Court, Central District of California
`Non-infringement reports on behalf of defendants and multiple accused systems
`One case – patent claims found invalid; two cases – settled.
`Jan 2008
`
`Patent infringement
`Mintz Levin
`Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation, CV 2:07-ML-01816-C-RGK (FFMx),
`CV 2:07-3002 RGK (FFMx), CV 2:07-2213-RGK (FFMx), US District Court, Central
`District of California (MDL) & Eastern District of Texas
`Invalidity report regarding asserted patent claims on behalf of defendants.
`Settled
`Jan 2008
`
`Patent infringement
`Foley Lardner
`Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation, CV 2:07-ML-01816-C-RGK (FFMx),
`CV 2:07-2360-RGK (FFMx), US District Court, Central District of California (MDL) &
`Eastern District of Texas
`Invalidity report and testimony in deposition regarding asserted patent claims on behalf
`of defendant.
`Patent claims found to be invalid.
`Jan 2008
`
`Legal Separation/With Minor
`McManis, Faulkner and Morgan
`Diana Q. Dong And Olivier Garbe, 6-08-FL-000101, State of California Superior Court,
`Country of Santa Clara
`Forensic capture of computer system’s hard drives
`Unknown
`Jan 2008
`
`Theft of Confidential Information
`Ackerman and Kevorkian LLP
`Bellotti v. Brenner Financial Group, 1-07-CV-100934 State of California Superior Court,
`Country of Santa Clara
`Forensic investigation of computer systems' hard drives for confidential information
`Settled
`Dec 2007
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 13
`
`

`

`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Robert Stillerman
`
`Theft of Confidential Information
`Ackerman and Kevorkian LLP
`Evans Analytical Group Llc Vs J. Traub, Et Al., 1-07-CV-097010, State of California
`Superior Court, Country of Santa Clara,
`Forensic investigation of computer systems' hard drives for confidential information
`Unknown
`Dec 2007
`
`Theft of Trade Secrets
`Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLP
`Block Financial Corporation v. Inisoft Corporation, 03C-04-010, Delaware Superior
`Court, New Castle County, CA 19232
`Investigated publicly available source code and supported expert report and rebuttal on
`behalf of Plaintiff’s action for declaratory judgment
`Unknown
`May 2007
`
`Fraud
`Ackerman and Kevorkian LLP
`SLC Motoring LLC v. Autosource Motoring, Inc. State of California Superior Court,
`Country of Santa Clara, 107-CV-083464
`Conducted forensic analysis of hard drives for passwords and server access dates.
`Settled
`May 2007
`
`Theft of trade secrets
`Hogan Holmes & Usoz LLP
`Confidential client
`Examined client's and other party's source code for possible theft of trade secrets
`Settled
`Mar 2007
`
`Copyright Infringement
`Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP
`Telemaster, Inc. v. The Vintage Club Master Association, US District Court, Central
`District of California, CV 05-05139 FMC(VBKx)
`Provided expert report and testimony in deposition on the installation, cabling,
`configuration and alleged proprietary customer data of a PBX installation on behalf of
`defendant
`Jury awarded reduced damages to Plaintiff – under appeal
`Mar 2007
`
`Patent Infringement
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, Chicago, IL
`Trading Technologies International Inc. v. eSpeed Corp., US District Court, N. District of
`Illinois, Eastern Division, CV 04C-5312
`Investigated defendant’s source code for alleged patent infringement on behalf of
`plaintiff. Conducted forensic analysis of hard drives for evidence regarding accused
`products.
`Jury found in favor of Trading Technologies on all counts
`Mar 2007
`
`Patent Infringement
`Howrey LLP, Washington, DC
`Cisco Corp v. Teles AG; Teles AG v. Cisco Corp (counterclaim) US District Court –
`District of Columbia, 1:05-CV-02048 (RBW)
`Investigated Cisco’s source code for alleged patent infringement on behalf of Teles AG.
`Provided expert reports and deposition testimony on infringement, rebuttal on validity
`and supplemental.
`Summary judgment of non-infringement, case has been stayed.
`
`
`Page 8 of 13
`
`

`

`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Jan 2007
`
`Patent Infringement
`Rohde & Van Kampen, Seattle, WA
`Timeline, Inc., v. Proclarity Corporation, US District Court – Western District of
`Washington, CV05-1013JLR
`Investigated defendant’s source code for alleged patent infringement involving data
`bases on behalf of the plaintiff
`Settled
`Dec 2006
`
`Patent Infringement
`Quinn Emanuel Urquart Oliver & Hodges, San Francisco, CA
`Bancorp Services LLP v Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, US District Court –
`Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division, 4:00-CV01073(CEJ)
`Investigated defendant’s source code for alleged patent infringement on behalf of the
`plaintiff
`Unknown
`Jun 2006
`
`Patent Infringement
`Kirkland & Ellis, San Francisco, CA
`Rackable Systems v. Supermicro Computer , US District Court, Northern District of
`California, San Francisco Division, C 05-03561 PJH
`Investigated patent infringement of server architecture on behalf of the plaintiff. Provided
`expert infringement and rebuttal reports and testimony in deposition.
`Settled, with favorable settlement to plaintiff
`Mar 2006
`
`Theft of Trade Secret
`McManis Faulkner & Morgan San Jose, CA
`Braden Partners v. Pina, Vay, Northern District, California, 1-05-CV-052203
`Performed forensic laptop computer hard drive capture on behalf of defendant.
`Dismissed
`Jan 2006
`
`Theft of Trade Secrets
`Fenwick & West, Mountain View, CA
`Advante International Corp v. Mintel Learning Technology, US District Court, Northern
`District of California, San Jose Division, C 05-01022 JW
`Investigated publicly available source code in support of plaintiff’s declaratory relief
`action
`Unknown
`Jan 2006
`
`Patent Infringement
`Quinn Emanuel Urquart Oliver & Hodges, San Francisco, CA
`Bancorp Services LLP v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, US District Court –
`Eastern District of Michigan, Eastern Division, 4:00-CV-1927(CEJ)
`Investigated defendant’s source code for alleged patent infringement on behalf of the
`plaintiff
`Unknown
`Jan 2006
`
`Patent Infringement
`Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Palo Alto, CA
`McKesson Information Solutions LLC v. The Trizetto Group, Inc., CA 04-1258 (SLR)
`Investigated defendant’s source code for alleged patent infringement on behalf of the
`plaintiff
`Unknown
`Oct 2005
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 13
`
`

`

`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`
`Theft of Trade Secrets
`Ruby & Schofield, San Jose, CA
`K. C. Multimedia v Bank of America Technology and Operations, Superior Court,
`California, 1-01-CV-798875
`Investigated prior sources of alleged trade secret information on behalf of the defendant
`Jury found in favor of the defendant, judgment upheld in appellate court
`Jun 2005
`
`Theft of Trade Secrets
`Ackerman and Kevorkian Law Offices, Santa Clara, CA
`Yield Dynamics Inc v. TEA Systems Corporation, Superior Court, California, 1-03-CV-
`000690
`Prepared expert report and deposition testimony on alleged theft of code and trade
`secret infringement on behalf of defendant
`Judgment in favor of the defendant
`Mar 2005
`
`Theft of confidential information
`Law Offices of Dan Price, Palo Alto, CA
`Credence Systems v. Peter Hancock, Northern District California, 1-05-CV-033775
`Performed forensic search of client’s laptop computer hard drive on behalf of defendant
`Settled with no harm to defendant
`Feb 2005
`
`Illegal sale of products
`Greenberg Traurig, Palo Alto, CA
`Cartier v. S. Merritt, Eastern District of California, Civ S-04-2279 GEB DAD
`Performed forensic search of hard drives for evidence of illegal sales on behalf of plaintiff
`Settled
`Nov 2004
`
`Theft of confidential information
`Bingham, McCutchen, San Francisco, CA
`The Benton v. Durran, California Labor Commission Case No. 07-52911-GH
`Performed forensic search of PC storage for deleted files
`Unknown
`Oct 2004
`
`Patent infringement
`Michael, Best & Friedrich, Milwaukee, WI
`Sybron v. Align, Federal, Central District of California, Southern Division, Case No. 02-
`05016 RGK (RNBx).
`Performed searches of files and emails for discovery
`Patent ruled invalid
`Aug 2004
`
`Patent infringement
`McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, Chicago, IL
`Symantec v. Computer Associates, Federal, Eastern District of Michigan, Southern
`Division, Case No. 02-CV-73740-DT
`Code analysis, product analysis, claim infringement analysis for the plaintiff
`Settled
`July 2004
`
`Copyright and patent infringement
`Thompson Coburn, St. Louis, MO
`Storage Technology Corporation v. Custom Hardware Engineering, Federal, District of
`Massachusetts, Boston, Case No. 02-12102 RWZ
`Code flow and analysis, data structure analysis for the defendant
`Settled
`April 2004
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 13
`
`

`

`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Type of Matter:
`Law Firm:
`Case Name:
`
`Services:
`Disposition:
`Date:
`
`Other
`
`
`
`Copyright infringement and trade secret
`JAMS, Los Angeles, CA
`Vanguard v Tone, Federal, Central District of California, Southern Division, Case No.
`SAC V03-87 DOC (Anx)
`Code analysis and report
`Settled
`April 2003
`
`Insurance Claim
`Sudekum & Shulruff, Chicago, IL
`Confidential client
`Analyzed value and marketability of specific cellular telephone handsets which had been
`stolen on behalf of a large insurance company. Advised on likelihood of internal theft by
`the insurance claimant.
`Loss claim was settled, where my analysis offered potential savings of more than
`$500,000 to the client
`January 2003
`
`Class action Y2K –product defect
`Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein
`Medimatch v AT&T, Federal, No. C99-3198-CAL, N.D. California.
`Analysis, expert report and deposition testimony on behalf of plaintiff regarding alleged
`Y2K failures in business communications systems
`Class action was granted, my testimony cited in the order; suit eventually settled
`Sep 2002
`
`Theft of trade secret
`Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Menlo Park, CA
`Harris Corporation v. Caly Networks, Western District, Wash. 2001, 2:00-01920-JCC
`Advisor to Harris’ counsel
`Settled
`Sep 2000
`
`Trademark infringement
`Rogers & Killeen
`Megastar Inc v Harris Corporation, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Cancellation No.
`26,056 (October 18, 2000)
`Deposed as fact witness for the defendant
`Judgment in favor of Harris Corporation
`April 1998
`
`Worked extensively with legal staff at Harris in preparing legal agreements which formed
`the basis for numerous partnerships, acquisitions and attempted acquisitions with
`Raytheon, Lucent Technologies, Wavtrace, Nortel – 1998-2001
`
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 13
`
`

`

`2001-present
`
`Chronological Summary of Professional Experience
`RS International Consulting Inc (formerly RS International), Palo Alto, CA, President
`Expert witness – investigations, analyses, reports, depositions and court testimony
`Software development in a cloud computing environment for mobile and web applications, and backend
`Consulting advisor to a software as a service company offering virtual event platforms
`Website and web application development (workflow)
`International business development, distribution and partnerships
`Advisor to small companies on strategy and tactics
`Technical sales training, including VoIP equipment
`Project and team management
`Mergers and Acquisitions consulting specifically related to post-merger integration
`2005-2007
`VoiceTip, Palo Alto, CA, CEO
`Introduced voice conferencing and webcasting services targeted at small to medium-sized enterprises.
`Wireless Dynamics, Palo Alto, CA, CEO
`2003-2005
`Developed a product targeted at manufacturing and process industries to collect and deliver sensor data for
`customers’ enterprise software applications using Zigbee wireless technology
`1995-2001
`Harris, Redwood Shores, CA, Vice President, Marketing, Business Development
`While primarily responsible for market and business development, I also led teams in technical marketing,
`regulatory affairs and product management for microwave radio products
`Developed a radio and network management tool that became a standard in the microwave industry.
`Developed complex tools for signal path analysis and planning
`Evaluated and architechted for new radio products.
`Led Harris into the Broadband Wireless Access business, including the acquisition of Wavtrace Corporation
`and the launch of an internally developed product. Oversaw the architecture and cost/performance tradeoffs
`First Pacific Networks, San Jose, CA, Director of Marketing
`1992-1995
`Responsible for overall marketing, product management, product requirements and communications activities
`within the company for the cable telephony product line
`Wrote product requirement documents, specifications and marketing plans for the FPN system, including
`network management, subscriber equipment and the overall system
`Repositioned FPN’s cable-telephony product line to the residential market, expanding FPN’s addressable
`market multifold
`RS Consulting, Palo Alto, CA, Marketing Consultant
`Provided marketing and technical services
`Assisted a variety of clients with business planning, channel strategy, competitive analysis, market analysis
`such as Xerox’s Palo Alto Research Center (PARC), Performance Processors, Inc., and First Pacific
`Networks
`Assisted a start up with C-language programming
`Taught software courses in an adult education program
`1989-1991
`UNISYS Europe-Africa Limited, Slough, England, Manager, Product Programs
`Responsible for industrial applications of products such as CAD/CAM, MRP, shop floor management and
`electronic document management solutions
`Developed OEM agreements with strategic partners to complement product weaknesses
`Led a team of professionals in the Industrial and Commercial line of business for the company responsible for
`selecting, introducing and promoting products throughout Europe
`
`
`1991-1992
`
`
`
`Robert Stillerman
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 13
`
`

`

`1979-1989
`
`
`IBM, ROLM Systems, Santa Clara, CA, Manager Product Planning
`Led Engineering, Product Development and Product Marketing functions for ROLM’s PBX
`Developed telephone line circuits, controllers and software on a standalone product for defense applications
`Managed automated testing of ROLM’s voicemail system and accelerated life cycle testing of hard disk drives
`Led the development of hard disk driver software, diagnostic tools and power on startup test routines
`Organized and led field trials for product introduction
`Led an engineering team developing products for applications of the CBX to the defense, hospitality, health
`care, financial services industr

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket