`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd.
`TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.
`TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.) Limited
`TTE Technology, Inc. (d/b/a TCL North America)
`TTE Corporation
`TCL Moka International Limited
`TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. de C.V.
`TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.
`Manufacturas Avanzadas S.A. de C.V.
`TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd
`Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.
`TCL Optoelectronics Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.
`TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.
`TCL Technology Group Corporation (f/k/a TCL Corp.),
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LG Electronics Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`Patent No. 7,982,803
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`
`
`
`300059-2067523275-836
`
`
`
`Petitioners TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`Technology Holdings, Ltd.); TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.; TCL Industries
`
`Holdings (H.K.) Limited; TTE Technology, Inc. (d/b/a TCL North America); TTE
`
`Corporation; TCL Moka International Limited; TCL Moka Manufactruing S.A. de
`
`C.V.; TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.; Manufacturas
`
`Avanzadas S.A. de C.V.; TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen TCL
`
`New Technology Co., Ltd.; TCL Optoelectronics Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.;
`
`TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.; TCL Technology Group Corporation (f/k/a TCL
`
`Corp.), (collectively “Petitioners”) hereby requests a refund of the $22,500 post-
`
`institution fee.
`
`On November 29, 2022, Petitioners filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803 (Paper 1) and paid the USPTO a total of $41,500,
`
`which included a $19,000 request fee and a $22,500 post-institution fee. On May
`
`22, 2023, the Board denied institution of inter partes review in this proceeding.
`
`See Paper 10.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners hereby request a refund of the $22,500 post-
`
`institution fee that it previously paid with the Petition. Petitioners respectfully
`
`request that the refunded post-institution fees be credited to Deposit Account No.
`
`603815.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Bradford A. Cangro/
`Bradford A. Cangro
`Reg. No. 58,478
`PV Law LLP
`5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
`Suite 440
`Washington, DC 20015
`(202) 371-6861
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`Dated: June 23, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEE was served on June 23,
`
`2023, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking
`
`System (P-TACTS) and providing a providing a copy via email to the following
`
`attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Mark A. Speegle
`Reg. No. 77,512
`Sean Lee
`Reg. No. 77,322
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`401 South First Street
`Suite 1300
`Austin, TX 78704
`
`Brianna L. Potter
`Reg. No. 76,748
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`Reg. No. 50,822
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001-5692
`
`Theodore W. Chandler
`Reg. No. 50,319
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1801 Century Park East
`Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`
`Ferenc Pazmandi
`Reg. No. 66,216
`Lute Yang
`Reg. No. 79,253
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California Street
`Suite 3200
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`DLLGE-TCL@BakerBotts.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bradford A. Cangro/
`
`Bradford A. Cangro, Reg. No. 58,478
`
`