`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia Technology Holdings, Ltd.
`TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.
`TCL Industries Holdings (H.K.) Limited
`TTE Technology, Inc. (d/b/a TCL North America)
`TTE Corporation
`TCL Moka International Limited
`TCL Moka Manufacturing S.A. de C.V.
`TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.
`Manufacturas Avanzadas S.A. de C.V.
`TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd
`Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.
`TCL Optoelectronics Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.
`TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.
`TCL Technology Group Corporation (f/k/a TCL Corp.),
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`LG Electronics Inc.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`Patent No. 7,982,803
`
`
`PETITIONERS’ REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEE
`
`
`
`300059-2067523275-836
`
`
`
`Petitioners TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (f/k/a TCL Multimedia
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`Technology Holdings, Ltd.); TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.; TCL Industries
`
`Holdings (H.K.) Limited; TTE Technology, Inc. (d/b/a TCL North America); TTE
`
`Corporation; TCL Moka International Limited; TCL Moka Manufactruing S.A. de
`
`C.V.; TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd.; Manufacturas
`
`Avanzadas S.A. de C.V.; TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen TCL
`
`New Technology Co., Ltd.; TCL Optoelectronics Technology (Huizhou) Co., Ltd.;
`
`TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.; TCL Technology Group Corporation (f/k/a TCL
`
`Corp.), (collectively “Petitioners”) hereby requests a refund of the $22,500 post-
`
`institution fee.
`
`On November 29, 2022, Petitioners filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803 (Paper 1) and paid the USPTO a total of $41,500,
`
`which included a $19,000 request fee and a $22,500 post-institution fee. On May
`
`22, 2023, the Board denied institution of inter partes review in this proceeding.
`
`See Paper 10.
`
`Accordingly, Petitioners hereby request a refund of the $22,500 post-
`
`institution fee that it previously paid with the Petition. Petitioners respectfully
`
`request that the refunded post-institution fees be credited to Deposit Account No.
`
`603815.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Bradford A. Cangro/
`Bradford A. Cangro
`Reg. No. 58,478
`PV Law LLP
`5335 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
`Suite 440
`Washington, DC 20015
`(202) 371-6861
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`Dated: June 23, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,982,803
`PTAB Case No. IPR2023-00240
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PETITIONERS’
`
`REQUEST FOR REFUND OF POST-INSTITUTION FEE was served on June 23,
`
`2023, by filing this document through the Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking
`
`System (P-TACTS) and providing a providing a copy via email to the following
`
`attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`Mark A. Speegle
`Reg. No. 77,512
`Sean Lee
`Reg. No. 77,322
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`401 South First Street
`Suite 1300
`Austin, TX 78704
`
`Brianna L. Potter
`Reg. No. 76,748
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1001 Page Mill Road
`Building One, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`
`
`Eliot D. Williams
`Reg. No. 50,822
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20001-5692
`
`Theodore W. Chandler
`Reg. No. 50,319
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`1801 Century Park East
`Suite 2400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`
`Ferenc Pazmandi
`Reg. No. 66,216
`Lute Yang
`Reg. No. 79,253
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`101 California Street
`Suite 3200
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`DLLGE-TCL@BakerBotts.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bradford A. Cangro/
`
`Bradford A. Cangro, Reg. No. 58,478
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
