throbber
John West
`Carol Tillis
`Eliane Sousa; Richard Chen; Christian Haudenschild
`JW Board slides for printing
`Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:54:46 AM
`CEO Overview JW 18July2012.ppt
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Hi Carol,
`
`My slides are attached. You will see I have focused on the model underlying the revenue of
`the budget, which should lead into your presentation.
`This version can be printed for the Board books.
`I will be leaving Cupertino in a few minutes and will see you soon.
`
`John West
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Personalis Board of Directors Meeting
`CEO Overview
`
`John West
`July 18, 2012
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`1
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Personalis Overview
`
`• Executing as planned, perhaps a little slower than we would like
`• Hiring competitive, but hires are almost to our “slow” budget of 2/month
`• Cash at 6/30 $400k above budget
`•
`Internal testing of Pipeline product : early but encouraging (Rich to discuss)
`• All staff moved to new office (great job by Carol):
`– New server room is a big help
`– New labs on schedule for end of July
`• Sequencers delivered (Hi-Seq & Mi-Seq)
`– Mi-Seq passed qualification run, starting to explore accuracy improvement assays
`– Hi-Seq install requires stable permanent location for optical alignment (Aug, in our new lab)
`Invited presentations :
`– Clinical Genomes meeting in San Francisco
`– Institute of Medicine in Washington DC
`– FDA rep requested our participation in an August meeting
`• Complete Genomics update (financing, long fragment read, staffing, IP)
`• ONT & Life / Ion Proton updates
`• Focus today on budget
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`•
`
`2
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Budget Guidance
`
`• Keep headcount growth to approx. “slow” plan of our Feb 2012 budget
`– Has been mostly R&D, now transition to 50% commercial & IP
`– Growth to continue in 2013, but most is contingent on revenue ramp
`
`• Market model revisited from July 26, 2011 (most recent version):
`– Worldwide capacity to sequence > 2x our mid-2011 estimate
`• Much faster adoption of Hi-Seq instrument
`• Significantly faster ramp in Hi-Seq data delivered per run
`• Much more sustained use of exomes
`• Cancer a larger share of whole genome than mid-2011 projection
`• Modest offset: Service business moderately below forecast & ILMN
`much higher market share
`• Focus on costs through 2012.
`• Revisit 2013, particularly revenue plan, in December for 2013 budget
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`3
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Revenue Plan
`Also vs 7/26/2011 Plan – Our most recent
`
`• Personalis plan changed to begin with Pipeline product vs comprehensive
`genome interpretation:
`– 100% research market, but accuracy a key requirement for clinical
`products
`– Headline application, Case / Control studies, inherently require larger
`#’s of genomes
`
`•
`
`Lab as an expanding part of our plan:
`– Direct relationship with the customer
`– Position towards whole-genome molecular diagnostics, vs “a
`bioinformatics company”
`– Opportunity to implement our IP in physical assays
`– Capture margin of the assay by leveraging our informatics
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`4
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Revenue Planning
`
`• Multiple assay scales:
`– Whole genome + Personalis “Exome-plus”
`– Just Personalis “Exome-plus”
`– Just a “standard” Exome
`– User provides data
`• Revenue Components:
`– Whole genome is 3rd party pass-through, so not in revenue or COGS
`– Base of in-house capacity to generate exomes with/without Personalis content &
`Personalis Pipeline analysis (linearly scalable with moderate CapEx)
`– Professional services overlay for Rare-Variant-Discovery-Service and Genome-
`Interpretation-Service products (Experience curve & automation are key to
`scalability)
`• Customer interaction model:
`– Pipeline : Case vs Control, chunks of 48 genomes, > $100k / transaction
`– RVDS & GIS : Genomes typically in trio or solo units, but customer relationship is
`to establish a flow, which we aggregate into 48-genome chunks internally
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`5
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Pricing Ranges of Components in Current Model
`
`• Whole genome sequencing (pass-through) :
`– 20 units, research only, 30x coverage : $3,400 mid-2012
`– Price of reagents alone to Personalis : $4,000 – Non-competitive
`– Multiple premium offerings seeking higher unit pricing:
`• 60x coverage : $6,100
`• CLIA single unit : $ 7,500 – 9,500
`• Rapid turn-around : $ 9,500
`• Exomes :
`– Not offered by Illumina or Complete Genomics
`– Multiple services, e.g. BGI : $1,800 – Prices firming
`– Personalis standard exome with Pipeline analysis : $2,500 / unit (Quantity 48)
`– Personalis “Exome-plus” with Pipeline analysis : $3,500 / unit (Quantity 48)
`• Professional services:
`– Unit = 8 hours genetic counselor + 1 hour MD : $3,500
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`6
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Example Pricing, Combining Components
`
`• Case / Control research service:
`– 24 cases + 24 controls
`– Personalis “Exome-Plus” with Pipeline Analysis only
`– 48 x $3,500 = $168k / project
`
`• Rare Variant Discovery Service:
`– Unit is for one trio (parents + child) but contract sought is for flow (N trios per time period)
`– 3 x “Exome-Plus” with 1 day RUO Professional Services
`– (3 x $3,500) + $3,500 = $14,000 (i.e. above Ambry)
`
`• Premium Genome Interpretation Service:
`– Unit is for one genome, but contract sought is for a flow
`– Pass-through Illumina 30x genome + Personalis “Exome-plus” + 2 days Professional
`Services
`– $ 3,400 + $3,500 + $7,000 = $13,900 ($10,500 is recognized as Personalis revenue)
`– Multiple price points with different combinations of components, to address differing customer
`needs & compete
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`7
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Top Level Revenue Breakdown by Product
`
`One product intro / quarter
`RVDS & GIS (35% of 2013 plan) could slip, depending on Pipeline feedback
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`8
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`9
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Comparison of Revenue Model vs 1 Year Ago:
`
`Approx. 3 month delay in getting the company started
`
`Pipeline as initial product vs full genome interpretation
`
`
`Larger individual projects (e.g. 24 cases & 24 controls)
`
`
`Initial linear ramp (capacity) vs exponential (experience curve)
`Company spending also slower (see next slide for comparison)
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`10
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Once the curves are normalized to cumulative cash used, they are fairly similar
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`11
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

`

`Discussion & Transition to Finance Presentation
`
`Personalis Confidential 7/18/2012
`
`12
`
`Personalis EX2071
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket